Free Trial

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service (CTNT) Competitors

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service logo
$1.81 +0.03 (+1.74%)
As of 09:46 AM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

CTNT vs. NHTC, UUU, SCNX, COSM, and TLIH

Should you buy Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service include Natural Health Trends (NHTC), Universal Security Instruments (UUU), Scienture (SCNX), Cosmos Health (COSM), and Ten-League International (TLIH). These companies are all part of the "wholesale" industry.

How does Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service compare to Natural Health Trends?

Natural Health Trends (NASDAQ:NHTC) and Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service (NASDAQ:CTNT) are both small-cap wholesale companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, valuation and institutional ownership.

Natural Health Trends has a net margin of -3.03% compared to Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's net margin of -389.47%. Natural Health Trends' return on equity of -4.88% beat Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Natural Health Trends-3.03% -4.88% -2.94%
Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service -389.47%-17.62%-15.69%

Natural Health Trends has a beta of 0.86, meaning that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has a beta of -0.88, meaning that its stock price is 188% less volatile than the broader market.

10.1% of Natural Health Trends shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.9% of Natural Health Trends shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 24.5% of Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Natural Health Trends and Natural Health Trends both had 1 articles in the media. Natural Health Trends' average media sentiment score of 1.91 beat Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's score of 1.89 indicating that Natural Health Trends is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Natural Health Trends Very Positive
Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service Very Positive

Natural Health Trends has higher revenue and earnings than Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service. Natural Health Trends is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Natural Health Trends$39.78M0.44-$880K-$0.11N/A
Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service$1.29M4.16-$3.65M-$182.53N/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Natural Health Trends
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Summary

Natural Health Trends beats Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service compare to Universal Security Instruments?

Universal Security Instruments (NYSE:UUU) and Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service (NASDAQ:CTNT) are both small-cap wholesale companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability and media sentiment.

0.0% of Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service shares are held by institutional investors. 9.1% of Universal Security Instruments shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 24.5% of Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Universal Security Instruments has a net margin of -5.77% compared to Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's net margin of -389.47%. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's return on equity of -17.62% beat Universal Security Instruments' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Universal Security Instruments-5.77% -27.30% -12.88%
Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service -389.47%-17.62%-15.69%

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Universal Security Instruments
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, Universal Security Instruments and Universal Security Instruments both had 1 articles in the media. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Universal Security Instruments' score of 0.83 indicating that Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Universal Security Instruments Positive
Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service Very Positive

Universal Security Instruments has a beta of -0.03, meaning that its share price is 103% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has a beta of -0.88, meaning that its share price is 188% less volatile than the broader market.

Universal Security Instruments has higher revenue and earnings than Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service. Universal Security Instruments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Universal Security Instruments$10.83M1.46-$400K-$0.08N/A
Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service$1.29M4.16-$3.65M-$182.53N/A

Summary

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service beats Universal Security Instruments on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service compare to Scienture?

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service (NASDAQ:CTNT) and Scienture (NASDAQ:SCNX) are both small-cap wholesale companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, valuation and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Scienture had 1 more articles in the media than Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Scienture and 1 mentions for Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Scienture's score of 0.93 indicating that Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service Very Positive
Scienture Positive

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has a beta of -0.88, indicating that its stock price is 188% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Scienture has a beta of 3.29, indicating that its stock price is 229% more volatile than the broader market.

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has higher revenue and earnings than Scienture. Scienture is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service$1.29M4.16-$3.65M-$182.53N/A
Scienture$430K36.19-$41.51M-$2.51N/A

0.0% of Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.7% of Scienture shares are owned by institutional investors. 24.5% of Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 21.4% of Scienture shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Scienture has a consensus target price of $1.50, indicating a potential upside of 291.64%. Given Scienture's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Scienture is more favorable than Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Scienture
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Scienture has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's net margin of -389.47%. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's return on equity of -17.62% beat Scienture's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service-389.47% -17.62% -15.69%
Scienture N/A -56.28%-44.76%

Summary

Scienture beats Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service compare to Cosmos Health?

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service (NASDAQ:CTNT) and Cosmos Health (NASDAQ:COSM) are both small-cap wholesale companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, risk, dividends, earnings and institutional ownership.

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Cosmos Health. Cosmos Health is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service$1.29M4.16-$3.65M-$182.53N/A
Cosmos Health$65.27M0.20-$19.15M-$0.64N/A

0.0% of Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.6% of Cosmos Health shares are held by institutional investors. 24.5% of Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 26.2% of Cosmos Health shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Cosmos Health has a net margin of -30.41% compared to Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's net margin of -389.47%. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's return on equity of -17.62% beat Cosmos Health's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service-389.47% -17.62% -15.69%
Cosmos Health -30.41%-52.85%-17.87%

In the previous week, Cosmos Health had 22 more articles in the media than Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Cosmos Health and 1 mentions for Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Cosmos Health's score of 0.92 indicating that Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service Very Positive
Cosmos Health Positive

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has a beta of -0.88, indicating that its share price is 188% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cosmos Health has a beta of 4.8, indicating that its share price is 380% more volatile than the broader market.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Cosmos Health
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Summary

Cosmos Health beats Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service compare to Ten-League International?

Ten-League International (NASDAQ:TLIH) and Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service (NASDAQ:CTNT) are both small-cap wholesale companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, risk and media sentiment.

Ten-League International has higher revenue and earnings than Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ten-League International$59.24M0.21$4.34MN/AN/A
Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service$1.29M4.16-$3.65M-$182.53N/A

Ten-League International has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's net margin of -389.47%. Ten-League International's return on equity of 0.00% beat Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ten-League InternationalN/A N/A N/A
Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service -389.47%-17.62%-15.69%

In the previous week, Ten-League International had 1 more articles in the media than Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Ten-League International and 1 mentions for Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Ten-League International's score of 1.44 indicating that Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ten-League International Positive
Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service Very Positive

0.0% of Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service shares are held by institutional investors. 24.5% of Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ten-League International
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Summary

Ten-League International beats Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CTNT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CTNT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CTNT vs. The Competition

MetricCheetah Net Supply Chain ServiceAUTO IndustryAuto SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$5.37M$70.50B$21.73B$12.05B
Dividend YieldN/A2.59%2.48%5.66%
P/E Ratio-0.0151.4519.4324.42
Price / Sales4.1627.1818.11123.88
Price / CashN/A23.4611.9437.92
Price / Book0.003.083.456.82
Net Income-$3.65M-$498.73M$335.50M$337.56M
7 Day Performance0.61%-1.88%0.75%1.16%
1 Month Performance-1.04%-1.22%2.35%3.16%
1 Year Performance-99.32%-19.12%3.98%30.60%

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CTNT
Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service
1.0536 of 5 stars
$1.81
+1.7%
N/A-99.3%$5.37M$1.29MN/A18
NHTC
Natural Health Trends
1.2313 of 5 stars
$2.32
+1.3%
N/A-56.4%$19.85M$39.78MN/A140
UUU
Universal Security Instruments
N/A$6.33
-1.6%
N/A+97.1%$17.18M$10.83MN/A10
SCNX
Scienture
3.0382 of 5 stars
$0.36
-2.5%
$1.50
+320.2%
-64.7%$14.51M$430KN/AN/A
COSM
Cosmos Health
2.1874 of 5 stars
$0.23
+2.1%
N/A-53.4%$13.91M$65.27MN/A100

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:CTNT) was last updated on 6/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners