Do analysts recommend FATBB or ELBM?

Electra Battery Materials has a consensus target price of $2.00, suggesting a potential upside of 238.87%. Given Electra Battery Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Electra Battery Materials is more favorable than FAT Brands. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score FAT Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Electra Battery Materials 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.25

Do analysts rate FEAM or FATBB?

5E Advanced Materials presently has a consensus target price of $5.25, indicating a potential upside of 226.09%. Given 5E Advanced Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe 5E Advanced Materials is more favorable than FAT Brands. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score 5E Advanced Materials 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.25 FAT Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Do analysts rate FATBB or OMEX?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score FAT Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Odyssey Marine Exploration 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Is FATBB or OMEX more profitable?

FAT Brands has a net margin of -39.33% compared to Odyssey Marine Exploration's net margin of -21,320.00%. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets FAT Brands -39.33% N/A -17.57% Odyssey Marine Exploration -21,320.00% N/A -262.11%

Do analysts rate FATBB or GRML?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score FAT Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Do analysts rate FMST or FATBB?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Foremost Clean Energy 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 FAT Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

FAT Brands (FATBB) Competitors

$0.89 0.00 (0.00%)

As of 08/14/2026

Compare

FATBB vs. ELBM, FEAM, OMEX, GRML, and FMST

Should you buy FAT Brands stock or one of its competitors? FAT Brands's main competitors and comparable companies include Electra Battery Materials (ELBM), 5E Advanced Materials (FEAM), Odyssey Marine Exploration (OMEX), Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock (GRML), and Foremost Clean Energy (FMST). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "metals & mining" industry.

How does FAT Brands compare to Electra Battery Materials?

FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FATBB) and Electra Battery Materials (NASDAQ:ELBM) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and dividends.

FAT Brands has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Electra Battery Materials has a beta of 2.53, indicating that its stock price is 153% more volatile than the broader market.

Electra Battery Materials has a consensus target price of $2.00, suggesting a potential upside of 238.87%. Given Electra Battery Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Electra Battery Materials is more favorable than FAT Brands.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
FAT Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Electra Battery Materials	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

32.9% of Electra Battery Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 59.9% of FAT Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 22.7% of Electra Battery Materials shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Electra Battery Materials has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%. Electra Battery Materials' return on equity of 18.21% beat FAT Brands' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
FAT Brands	-39.33%	N/A	-17.57%
Electra Battery Materials	N/A	18.21%	6.93%

In the previous week, Electra Battery Materials had 6 more articles in the media than FAT Brands. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Electra Battery Materials and 0 mentions for FAT Brands. Electra Battery Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat FAT Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Electra Battery Materials is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
FAT Brands	Neutral
Electra Battery Materials	Positive

Electra Battery Materials has lower revenue, but higher earnings than FAT Brands. Electra Battery Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FAT Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
FAT Brands	$574.14M	0.03	-$189.85M	-$13.35	N/A
Electra Battery Materials	N/A	N/A	-$95.52M	-$1.16	N/A

Summary

Electra Battery Materials beats FAT Brands on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FAT Brands compare to 5E Advanced Materials?

5E Advanced Materials (NASDAQ:FEAM) and FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FATBB) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends and institutional ownership.

5E Advanced Materials has a beta of 1.9, indicating that its share price is 90% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FAT Brands has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, 5E Advanced Materials had 3 more articles in the media than FAT Brands. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for 5E Advanced Materials and 0 mentions for FAT Brands. 5E Advanced Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat FAT Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that 5E Advanced Materials is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
5E Advanced Materials	Positive
FAT Brands	Neutral

5E Advanced Materials has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%. FAT Brands' return on equity of 0.00% beat 5E Advanced Materials' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
5E Advanced Materials	N/A	-70.04%	-62.90%
FAT Brands	-39.33%	N/A	-17.57%

5E Advanced Materials has higher earnings, but lower revenue than FAT Brands. 5E Advanced Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FAT Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
5E Advanced Materials	N/A	N/A	-$31.56M	-$1.34	N/A
FAT Brands	$574.14M	0.03	-$189.85M	-$13.35	N/A

5E Advanced Materials presently has a consensus target price of $5.25, indicating a potential upside of 226.09%. Given 5E Advanced Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe 5E Advanced Materials is more favorable than FAT Brands.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
5E Advanced Materials	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
FAT Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Summary

5E Advanced Materials beats FAT Brands on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FAT Brands compare to Odyssey Marine Exploration?

FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FATBB) and Odyssey Marine Exploration (NASDAQ:OMEX) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

50.0% of Odyssey Marine Exploration shares are owned by institutional investors. 59.9% of FAT Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.2% of Odyssey Marine Exploration shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

FAT Brands has a beta of 1.03, suggesting that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Odyssey Marine Exploration has a beta of -0.15, suggesting that its share price is 115% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Odyssey Marine Exploration had 4 more articles in the media than FAT Brands. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Odyssey Marine Exploration and 0 mentions for FAT Brands. Odyssey Marine Exploration's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat FAT Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Odyssey Marine Exploration is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
FAT Brands	Neutral
Odyssey Marine Exploration	Positive

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
FAT Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Odyssey Marine Exploration	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Odyssey Marine Exploration has lower revenue, but higher earnings than FAT Brands. Odyssey Marine Exploration is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FAT Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
FAT Brands	$574.14M	0.03	-$189.85M	-$13.35	N/A
Odyssey Marine Exploration	$184.07K	287.22	-$43.08M	-$0.85	N/A

FAT Brands has a net margin of -39.33% compared to Odyssey Marine Exploration's net margin of -21,320.00%.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
FAT Brands	-39.33%	N/A	-17.57%
Odyssey Marine Exploration	-21,320.00%	N/A	-262.11%

Summary

FAT Brands and Odyssey Marine Exploration tied by winning 6 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FAT Brands compare to Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock?

FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FATBB) and Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock (NASDAQ:GRML) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership and risk.

Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%. FAT Brands' return on equity of 0.00% beat Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
FAT Brands	-39.33%	N/A	-17.57%
Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock	N/A	-109.40%	-98.80%

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
FAT Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

FAT Brands has a beta of 1.03, suggesting that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock has a beta of 7.13, suggesting that its share price is 613% more volatile than the broader market.

Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock has lower revenue, but higher earnings than FAT Brands. Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FAT Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
FAT Brands	$574.14M	0.03	-$189.85M	-$13.35	N/A
Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock	N/A	N/A	-$10.55M	-$0.32	N/A

In the previous week, Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock had 2 more articles in the media than FAT Brands. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock and 0 mentions for FAT Brands. Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat FAT Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
FAT Brands	Neutral
Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock	Positive

20.1% of Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock shares are owned by institutional investors. 59.9% of FAT Brands shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 11.3% of Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock beats FAT Brands on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FAT Brands compare to Foremost Clean Energy?

Foremost Clean Energy (NASDAQ:FMST) and FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FATBB) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Foremost Clean Energy	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
FAT Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Foremost Clean Energy has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%. FAT Brands' return on equity of 0.00% beat Foremost Clean Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Foremost Clean Energy	N/A	-24.40%	-22.63%
FAT Brands	-39.33%	N/A	-17.57%

0.1% of Foremost Clean Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 59.9% of FAT Brands shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Foremost Clean Energy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than FAT Brands. Foremost Clean Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FAT Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Foremost Clean Energy	N/A	N/A	-$4.99M	-$0.35	N/A
FAT Brands	$574.14M	0.03	-$189.85M	-$13.35	N/A

In the previous week, Foremost Clean Energy had 3 more articles in the media than FAT Brands. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Foremost Clean Energy and 0 mentions for FAT Brands. Foremost Clean Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat FAT Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Foremost Clean Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Foremost Clean Energy	Positive
FAT Brands	Neutral

Foremost Clean Energy has a beta of 4.62, suggesting that its share price is 362% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FAT Brands has a beta of 1.03, suggesting that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Foremost Clean Energy beats FAT Brands on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get FAT Brands News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FATBB and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

FATBB vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	FAT Brands	Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$15.91M	$3.76B	$4.82B	$13.06B
Dividend Yield	N/A	5.23%	4.71%	10.45%
P/E Ratio	-0.07	23.62	25.56	25.38
Price / Sales	0.03	7,622.58	4,528.61	77.95
Price / Cash	N/A	29.62	27.05	50.90
Price / Book	-0.03	10.38	8.82	6.25
Net Income	-$189.85M	$122.18M	$154.16M	$347.82M
7 Day Performance	N/A	1.28%	0.96%	1.08%
1 Month Performance	N/A	8.56%	7.10%	0.82%
1 Year Performance	-63.94%	54.92%	43.37%	20.99%

FAT Brands Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
FATBB FAT Brands	N/A	$0.89 flat	N/A	N/A	$15.91M	$574.14M	N/A	7,131
ELBM Electra Battery Materials	3.1421 of 5 stars	$0.54 -0.4%	$2.00 +269.0%	-47.8%	$57.89M	N/A	N/A	37	Earnings Report
FEAM 5E Advanced Materials	3.8618 of 5 stars	$1.29 -2.7%	$5.25 +308.6%	-66.0%	$53.34M	N/A	N/A	20
OMEX Odyssey Marine Exploration	0.2945 of 5 stars	$0.72 -1.7%	N/A	-97.8%	$42.35M	$350K	N/A	10	News Coverage Positive News Earnings Report Analyst Upgrade
GRML Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock	1.6056 of 5 stars	$0.19 -1.8%	N/A	-73.9%	$26.25M	N/A	N/A	5	Analyst Downgrade Gap Down

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:FATBB) was last updated on 8/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

FAT Brands (FATBB) Competitors

FATBB vs. ELBM, FEAM, OMEX, GRML, and FMST

How does FAT Brands compare to Electra Battery Materials?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to 5E Advanced Materials?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Odyssey Marine Exploration?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Foremost Clean Energy?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FATBB vs. The Competition

FAT Brands Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

FAT Brands (FATBB) Competitors

FATBB vs. ELBM, FEAM, OMEX, GRML, and FMST

How does FAT Brands compare to Electra Battery Materials?

Which has more risk and volatility, FATBB or ELBM?

Do analysts recommend FATBB or ELBM?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in FATBB or ELBM?

Is FATBB or ELBM more profitable?

Does the media favor FATBB or ELBM?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, FATBB or ELBM?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to 5E Advanced Materials?

Which has more volatility & risk, FEAM or FATBB?

Does the media refer more to FEAM or FATBB?

Is FEAM or FATBB more profitable?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, FEAM or FATBB?

Do analysts rate FEAM or FATBB?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Odyssey Marine Exploration?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in FATBB or OMEX?

Which has more volatility & risk, FATBB or OMEX?

Does the media prefer FATBB or OMEX?

Do analysts rate FATBB or OMEX?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, FATBB or OMEX?

Is FATBB or OMEX more profitable?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock?

Is FATBB or GRML more profitable?

Do analysts rate FATBB or GRML?

Which has more risk and volatility, FATBB or GRML?

Which has better valuation and earnings, FATBB or GRML?

Does the media prefer FATBB or GRML?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in FATBB or GRML?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Foremost Clean Energy?

Do analysts rate FMST or FATBB?

Is FMST or FATBB more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in FMST or FATBB?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, FMST or FATBB?

Does the media favor FMST or FATBB?

Which has more volatility & risk, FMST or FATBB?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FATBB vs. The Competition

FAT Brands Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools