Do analysts rate GRML or FATBB?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 FAT Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Do analysts rate OMEX or FATBB?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Odyssey Marine Exploration 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 FAT Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Is OMEX or FATBB more profitable?

FAT Brands has a net margin of -39.33% compared to Odyssey Marine Exploration's net margin of -21,320.00%. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Odyssey Marine Exploration -21,320.00% N/A -262.11% FAT Brands -39.33% N/A -17.57%

Do analysts prefer AUST or FATBB?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Austin Gold 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 FAT Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Is AUST or FATBB more profitable?

Austin Gold has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%. FAT Brands' return on equity of 0.00% beat Austin Gold's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Austin Gold N/A -37.85% -36.54% FAT Brands -39.33% N/A -17.57%

Do analysts prefer FMST or FATBB?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Foremost Clean Energy 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 FAT Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

FAT Brands (FATBB) Competitors

$0.89 0.00 (0.00%)

As of 09/23/2026

Compare

FATBB vs. ELBM, GRML, OMEX, AUST, and FMST

Should you buy FAT Brands stock or one of its competitors? FAT Brands's main competitors and comparable companies include Electra Battery Materials (ELBM), Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock (GRML), Odyssey Marine Exploration (OMEX), Austin Gold (AUST), and Foremost Clean Energy (FMST). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "metals & mining" industry.

How does FAT Brands compare to Electra Battery Materials?

Electra Battery Materials (NASDAQ:ELBM) and FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FATBB) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings and dividends.

32.9% of Electra Battery Materials shares are held by institutional investors. 22.7% of Electra Battery Materials shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 59.9% of FAT Brands shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Electra Battery Materials has higher earnings, but lower revenue than FAT Brands. Electra Battery Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FAT Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Electra Battery Materials	N/A	N/A	-$95.52M	-$1.08	N/A
FAT Brands	$574.14M	0.03	-$189.85M	-$13.35	N/A

In the previous week, Electra Battery Materials had 1 more articles in the media than FAT Brands. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Electra Battery Materials and 0 mentions for FAT Brands. Electra Battery Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat FAT Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Electra Battery Materials is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Electra Battery Materials	Positive
FAT Brands	Neutral

Electra Battery Materials has a beta of 2.55, indicating that its share price is 155% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FAT Brands has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.

Electra Battery Materials currently has a consensus target price of $2.00, suggesting a potential upside of 279.58%. Given Electra Battery Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Electra Battery Materials is more favorable than FAT Brands.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Electra Battery Materials	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
FAT Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Electra Battery Materials has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%. Electra Battery Materials' return on equity of 18.21% beat FAT Brands' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Electra Battery Materials	N/A	18.21%	6.93%
FAT Brands	-39.33%	N/A	-17.57%

Summary

Electra Battery Materials beats FAT Brands on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FAT Brands compare to Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock?

Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock (NASDAQ:GRML) and FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FATBB) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock has a beta of 6.91, meaning that its share price is 591% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FAT Brands has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock had 17 more articles in the media than FAT Brands. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock and 0 mentions for FAT Brands. Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock's average media sentiment score of 0.08 beat FAT Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock	Neutral
FAT Brands	Neutral

Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%. FAT Brands' return on equity of 0.00% beat Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock	N/A	-67.98%	-60.61%
FAT Brands	-39.33%	N/A	-17.57%

20.1% of Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock shares are owned by institutional investors. 11.3% of Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 59.9% of FAT Brands shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock has higher earnings, but lower revenue than FAT Brands. Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FAT Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock	N/A	N/A	-$10.55M	-$11.50	N/A
FAT Brands	$574.14M	0.03	-$189.85M	-$13.35	N/A

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
FAT Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Summary

Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock beats FAT Brands on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FAT Brands compare to Odyssey Marine Exploration?

Odyssey Marine Exploration (NASDAQ:OMEX) and FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FATBB) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk and earnings.

Odyssey Marine Exploration has a beta of -0.08, meaning that its stock price is 108% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FAT Brands has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Odyssey Marine Exploration had 1 more articles in the media than FAT Brands. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Odyssey Marine Exploration and 0 mentions for FAT Brands. Odyssey Marine Exploration's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat FAT Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Odyssey Marine Exploration is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Odyssey Marine Exploration	Positive
FAT Brands	Neutral

FAT Brands has a net margin of -39.33% compared to Odyssey Marine Exploration's net margin of -21,320.00%.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Odyssey Marine Exploration	-21,320.00%	N/A	-262.11%
FAT Brands	-39.33%	N/A	-17.57%

50.0% of Odyssey Marine Exploration shares are held by institutional investors. 5.2% of Odyssey Marine Exploration shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 59.9% of FAT Brands shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Odyssey Marine Exploration has higher earnings, but lower revenue than FAT Brands. Odyssey Marine Exploration is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FAT Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Odyssey Marine Exploration	$350K	117.65	-$43.08M	-$0.85	N/A
FAT Brands	$574.14M	0.03	-$189.85M	-$13.35	N/A

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Odyssey Marine Exploration	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
FAT Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Summary

Odyssey Marine Exploration and FAT Brands tied by winning 6 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FAT Brands compare to Austin Gold?

Austin Gold (NYSE:AUST) and FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FATBB) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

Austin Gold has higher earnings, but lower revenue than FAT Brands. Austin Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FAT Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Austin Gold	N/A	N/A	-$4M	-$0.18	N/A
FAT Brands	$574.14M	0.03	-$189.85M	-$13.35	N/A

62.1% of Austin Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. 70.7% of Austin Gold shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 59.9% of FAT Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Austin Gold has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%. FAT Brands' return on equity of 0.00% beat Austin Gold's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Austin Gold	N/A	-37.85%	-36.54%
FAT Brands	-39.33%	N/A	-17.57%

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Austin Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
FAT Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Austin Gold has a beta of 0.96, indicating that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FAT Brands has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Austin Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled FAT Brands'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Austin Gold	Neutral
FAT Brands	Neutral

Summary

FAT Brands beats Austin Gold on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FAT Brands compare to Foremost Clean Energy?

Foremost Clean Energy (NASDAQ:FMST) and FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FATBB) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, earnings, profitability and media sentiment.

0.1% of Foremost Clean Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 59.9% of FAT Brands shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Foremost Clean Energy	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
FAT Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Foremost Clean Energy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than FAT Brands. Foremost Clean Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FAT Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Foremost Clean Energy	N/A	N/A	-$4.99M	-$0.42	N/A
FAT Brands	$574.14M	0.03	-$189.85M	-$13.35	N/A

Foremost Clean Energy has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%. FAT Brands' return on equity of 0.00% beat Foremost Clean Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Foremost Clean Energy	N/A	-24.25%	-22.55%
FAT Brands	-39.33%	N/A	-17.57%

Foremost Clean Energy has a beta of 4.56, meaning that its stock price is 356% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FAT Brands has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Foremost Clean Energy had 1 more articles in the media than FAT Brands. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Foremost Clean Energy and 0 mentions for FAT Brands. Foremost Clean Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled FAT Brands'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Foremost Clean Energy	Neutral
FAT Brands	Neutral

Summary

Foremost Clean Energy beats FAT Brands on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get FAT Brands News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FATBB and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

FATBB vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	FAT Brands	Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$15.91M	$3.91B	$4.90B	$13.29B
Dividend Yield	N/A	5.21%	4.70%	12.57%
P/E Ratio	-0.07	25.55	25.87	25.76
Price / Sales	0.03	29,645.62	17,611.66	106.32
Price / Cash	N/A	29.47	26.89	52.76
Price / Book	-0.03	11.84	9.85	6.34
Net Income	-$189.85M	$127.53M	$158.14M	$360.00M
7 Day Performance	N/A	0.37%	0.03%	-0.16%
1 Month Performance	N/A	-2.99%	-3.00%	-4.07%
1 Year Performance	-65.28%	30.26%	25.25%	5.97%

FAT Brands Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
FATBB FAT Brands	N/A	$0.89 flat	N/A	N/A	$15.91M	$574.14M	N/A	5,200
ELBM Electra Battery Materials	2.6467 of 5 stars	$0.57 -1.8%	$2.00 +254.0%	-46.9%	$60.32M	N/A	N/A	24
GRML Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock	1.5469 of 5 stars	$15.94 +12.7%	N/A	-41.1%	$50.69M	N/A	N/A	5	Trending News Gap Up High Trading Volume
OMEX Odyssey Marine Exploration	0.118 of 5 stars	$0.74 -2.2%	N/A	-98.7%	$42.90M	$350K	N/A	12	Analyst Forecast
AUST Austin Gold	N/A	$1.12 -0.9%	N/A	-38.1%	$15.34M	N/A	N/A	3

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:FATBB) was last updated on 9/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

FAT Brands (FATBB) Competitors

FATBB vs. ELBM, GRML, OMEX, AUST, and FMST

How does FAT Brands compare to Electra Battery Materials?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Odyssey Marine Exploration?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Austin Gold?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Foremost Clean Energy?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FATBB vs. The Competition

FAT Brands Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

FAT Brands (FATBB) Competitors

FATBB vs. ELBM, GRML, OMEX, AUST, and FMST

How does FAT Brands compare to Electra Battery Materials?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in ELBM or FATBB?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, ELBM or FATBB?

Does the media prefer ELBM or FATBB?

Which has more volatility and risk, ELBM or FATBB?

Do analysts recommend ELBM or FATBB?

Is ELBM or FATBB more profitable?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock?

Which has more volatility & risk, GRML or FATBB?

Does the media prefer GRML or FATBB?

Is GRML or FATBB more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of GRML or FATBB?

Which has better earnings and valuation, GRML or FATBB?

Do analysts rate GRML or FATBB?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Odyssey Marine Exploration?

Which has more risk & volatility, OMEX or FATBB?

Does the media prefer OMEX or FATBB?

Is OMEX or FATBB more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in OMEX or FATBB?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, OMEX or FATBB?

Do analysts rate OMEX or FATBB?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Austin Gold?

Which has better valuation and earnings, AUST or FATBB?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in AUST or FATBB?

Is AUST or FATBB more profitable?

Do analysts prefer AUST or FATBB?

Which has more volatility & risk, AUST or FATBB?

Does the media prefer AUST or FATBB?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Foremost Clean Energy?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of FMST or FATBB?

Do analysts prefer FMST or FATBB?

Which has better earnings and valuation, FMST or FATBB?

Is FMST or FATBB more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, FMST or FATBB?

Does the media refer more to FMST or FATBB?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FATBB vs. The Competition

FAT Brands Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools