Free Trial
The Market Does Not Wait. MarketBeat All Access for Just $149
  • 0Days
  • 0Hours
  • 0Minutes
  • 0Seconds
Get the Deal
Claim MarketBeat All Access Sale Promotion

FAT Brands (FATBB) Competitors

FAT Brands logo
$0.89 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 05/22/2026

FATBB vs. HCHL, CNTY, ARKR, MRNO, and PC

Should you buy FAT Brands stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares FAT Brands with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with FAT Brands include Happy City (HCHL), Century Casinos (CNTY), Ark Restaurants (ARKR), Murano Global BV (MRNO), and Premium Catering (PC). These companies are all part of the "restaurants, hotels, motels" industry.

How does FAT Brands compare to Happy City?

FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FATBB) and Happy City (NASDAQ:HCHL) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, risk and institutional ownership.

Happy City has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FAT Brands-39.33% N/A -17.57%
Happy City N/A N/A N/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FAT Brands
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Happy City
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Happy City has lower revenue, but higher earnings than FAT Brands.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FAT Brands$574.14M0.03-$189.85M-$13.35N/A
Happy City$6.80M9.72N/AN/AN/A

In the previous week, Happy City had 1 more articles in the media than FAT Brands. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Happy City and 0 mentions for FAT Brands. Happy City's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat FAT Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Happy City is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
FAT Brands Neutral
Happy City Positive

Summary

Happy City beats FAT Brands on 5 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FAT Brands compare to Century Casinos?

Century Casinos (NASDAQ:CNTY) and FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FATBB) are both small-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk and earnings.

66.4% of Century Casinos shares are held by institutional investors. 13.0% of Century Casinos shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 59.9% of FAT Brands shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Century Casinos has a beta of 1.69, indicating that its share price is 69% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FAT Brands has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.

Century Casinos presently has a consensus price target of $3.00, suggesting a potential upside of 129.01%. Given Century Casinos' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Century Casinos is more favorable than FAT Brands.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Century Casinos
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
FAT Brands
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, Century Casinos' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled FAT Brands'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Century Casinos Neutral
FAT Brands Neutral

Century Casinos has a net margin of -9.88% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%. FAT Brands' return on equity of 0.00% beat Century Casinos' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Century Casinos-9.88% -3,789.52% -4.97%
FAT Brands -39.33%N/A -17.57%

Century Casinos has higher revenue and earnings than FAT Brands. Century Casinos is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FAT Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Century Casinos$579.77M0.06-$61.42M-$1.94N/A
FAT Brands$574.14M0.03-$189.85M-$13.35N/A

Summary

Century Casinos beats FAT Brands on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FAT Brands compare to Ark Restaurants?

Ark Restaurants (NASDAQ:ARKR) and FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FATBB) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability, risk, valuation, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Ark Restaurants has a beta of 0.34, suggesting that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FAT Brands has a beta of 1.03, suggesting that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, FAT Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Ark Restaurants' score of -1.00 indicating that FAT Brands is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ark Restaurants Negative
FAT Brands Neutral

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ark Restaurants
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
FAT Brands
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Ark Restaurants has a net margin of -3.97% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%. FAT Brands' return on equity of 0.00% beat Ark Restaurants' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ark Restaurants-3.97% -8.49% -2.09%
FAT Brands -39.33%N/A -17.57%

Ark Restaurants has higher earnings, but lower revenue than FAT Brands. Ark Restaurants is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FAT Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ark Restaurants$165.75M0.14-$11.47M-$1.74N/A
FAT Brands$574.14M0.03-$189.85M-$13.35N/A

32.0% of Ark Restaurants shares are owned by institutional investors. 37.5% of Ark Restaurants shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 59.9% of FAT Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Ark Restaurants and FAT Brands tied by winning 6 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FAT Brands compare to Murano Global BV?

FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FATBB) and Murano Global BV (NASDAQ:MRNO) are both small-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings and media sentiment.

Murano Global BV has lower revenue, but higher earnings than FAT Brands.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FAT Brands$574.14M0.03-$189.85M-$13.35N/A
Murano Global BV$59.49M0.47-$14.73MN/AN/A

In the previous week, Murano Global BV had 1 more articles in the media than FAT Brands. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Murano Global BV and 0 mentions for FAT Brands. Murano Global BV's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat FAT Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Murano Global BV is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
FAT Brands Neutral
Murano Global BV Positive

FAT Brands has a beta of 1.03, suggesting that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Murano Global BV has a beta of 0.37, suggesting that its share price is 63% less volatile than the broader market.

Murano Global BV has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FAT Brands-39.33% N/A -17.57%
Murano Global BV N/A N/A N/A

11.8% of Murano Global BV shares are owned by institutional investors. 59.9% of FAT Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 71.2% of Murano Global BV shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FAT Brands
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Murano Global BV
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Summary

Murano Global BV beats FAT Brands on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FAT Brands compare to Premium Catering?

FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FATBB) and Premium Catering (NASDAQ:PC) are both small-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, earnings, profitability, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, FAT Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Premium Catering'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
FAT Brands Neutral
Premium Catering Neutral

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FAT Brands
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Premium Catering
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Premium Catering has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FAT Brands-39.33% N/A -17.57%
Premium Catering N/A N/A N/A

FAT Brands has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Premium Catering has a beta of 0.6, indicating that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

Premium Catering has lower revenue, but higher earnings than FAT Brands.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FAT Brands$574.14M0.03-$189.85M-$13.35N/A
Premium Catering$3.35M5.81-$4.24MN/AN/A

Summary

Premium Catering beats FAT Brands on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get FAT Brands News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FATBB and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FATBB and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FATBB vs. The Competition

MetricFAT BrandsRETAIL IndustryRetail SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$15.91M$11.14B$27.40B$12.31B
Dividend YieldN/A2.77%178.41%5.31%
P/E Ratio-0.0726.6619.7425.66
Price / Sales0.031.634.1083.69
Price / CashN/A14.7614.9056.72
Price / Book-0.034.285.197.14
Net Income-$189.85M$392.93M$957.86M$335.72M
7 Day PerformanceN/A1.29%2.02%3.03%
1 Month PerformanceN/A-1.71%-0.30%2.88%
1 Year Performance-66.14%-8.71%2.05%35.20%

FAT Brands Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FATBB
FAT Brands
N/A$0.89
flat
N/AN/A$15.91M$574.14MN/A7,131
HCHL
Happy City
N/A$2.90
+16.0%
N/AN/A$48.03MN/AN/A104
CNTY
Century Casinos
2.7017 of 5 stars
$1.39
-1.4%
$3.00
+115.8%
-34.2%$39.72M$572.97MN/A3,756
ARKR
Ark Restaurants
0.4706 of 5 stars
$6.47
-7.7%
N/A-44.7%$25.28M$165.75MN/A1,566
MRNO
Murano Global BV
1.2376 of 5 stars
$0.28
-6.9%
N/A-96.5%$23.56M$1.20BN/A1,088

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:FATBB) was last updated on 5/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners