Do analysts recommend FATBB or GENK?

GEN Restaurant Group has a consensus price target of $4.50, suggesting a potential upside of 114.29%. Given GEN Restaurant Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe GEN Restaurant Group is more favorable than FAT Brands. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score FAT Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 GEN Restaurant Group 2 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.75

Do analysts rate FATBB or CNTY?

Century Casinos has a consensus price target of $3.00, suggesting a potential upside of 106.90%. Given Century Casinos' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Century Casinos is more favorable than FAT Brands. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score FAT Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Century Casinos 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33

Is FATBB or CNTY more profitable?

Century Casinos has a net margin of -9.88% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%. FAT Brands' return on equity of 0.00% beat Century Casinos' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets FAT Brands -39.33% N/A -17.57% Century Casinos -9.88% -3,789.52% -4.97%

Do analysts prefer MRNO or FATBB?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Murano Global BV 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 FAT Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, MRNO or FATBB?

Murano Global BV has higher revenue and earnings than FAT Brands. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Murano Global BV $1.14B 0.02 -$14.74M N/A N/A FAT Brands $574.14M 0.03 -$189.85M -$13.35 N/A

Is MRNO or FATBB more profitable?

Murano Global BV has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Murano Global BV N/A N/A N/A FAT Brands -39.33% N/A -17.57%

Do analysts rate FATBB or ARKR?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score FAT Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Ark Restaurants 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Do analysts recommend PC or FATBB?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Premium Catering 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 FAT Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, PC or FATBB?

Premium Catering has higher earnings, but lower revenue than FAT Brands. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Premium Catering $3.35M 5.81 -$4.24M N/A N/A FAT Brands $574.14M 0.03 -$189.85M -$13.35 N/A

Is PC or FATBB more profitable?

Premium Catering has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Premium Catering N/A N/A N/A FAT Brands -39.33% N/A -17.57%

FAT Brands (FATBB) Competitors

$0.89 0.00 (0.00%)

As of 06/12/2026

Compare

FATBB vs. GENK, CNTY, MRNO, ARKR, and PC

Should you buy FAT Brands stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares FAT Brands with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with FAT Brands include GEN Restaurant Group (GENK), Century Casinos (CNTY), Murano Global BV (MRNO), Ark Restaurants (ARKR), and Premium Catering (PC). These companies are all part of the "restaurants, hotels, motels" industry.

How does FAT Brands compare to GEN Restaurant Group?

FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FATBB) and GEN Restaurant Group (NASDAQ:GENK) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.

GEN Restaurant Group has a consensus price target of $4.50, suggesting a potential upside of 114.29%. Given GEN Restaurant Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe GEN Restaurant Group is more favorable than FAT Brands.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
FAT Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
GEN Restaurant Group	2 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.75

In the previous week, GEN Restaurant Group had 3 more articles in the media than FAT Brands. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for GEN Restaurant Group and 0 mentions for FAT Brands. GEN Restaurant Group's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat FAT Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that GEN Restaurant Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
FAT Brands	Neutral
GEN Restaurant Group	Positive

GEN Restaurant Group has a net margin of -1.86% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%. FAT Brands' return on equity of 0.00% beat GEN Restaurant Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
FAT Brands	-39.33%	N/A	-17.57%
GEN Restaurant Group	-1.86%	-4.50%	-0.56%

10.2% of GEN Restaurant Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 59.9% of FAT Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 59.1% of GEN Restaurant Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

GEN Restaurant Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than FAT Brands. GEN Restaurant Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FAT Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
FAT Brands	$574.14M	0.03	-$189.85M	-$13.35	N/A
GEN Restaurant Group	$212.54M	0.33	-$3.03M	-$0.74	N/A

FAT Brands has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GEN Restaurant Group has a beta of 0.99, meaning that its stock price is 1% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

GEN Restaurant Group beats FAT Brands on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FAT Brands compare to Century Casinos?

FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FATBB) and Century Casinos (NASDAQ:CNTY) are both small-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings and dividends.

66.4% of Century Casinos shares are owned by institutional investors. 59.9% of FAT Brands shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.0% of Century Casinos shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Century Casinos has lower revenue, but higher earnings than FAT Brands. Century Casinos is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FAT Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
FAT Brands	$574.14M	0.03	-$189.85M	-$13.35	N/A
Century Casinos	$572.97M	0.07	-$61.42M	-$1.94	N/A

Century Casinos has a consensus price target of $3.00, suggesting a potential upside of 106.90%. Given Century Casinos' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Century Casinos is more favorable than FAT Brands.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
FAT Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Century Casinos	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

Century Casinos has a net margin of -9.88% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%. FAT Brands' return on equity of 0.00% beat Century Casinos' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
FAT Brands	-39.33%	N/A	-17.57%
Century Casinos	-9.88%	-3,789.52%	-4.97%

FAT Brands has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Century Casinos has a beta of 1.66, indicating that its share price is 66% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Century Casinos had 2 more articles in the media than FAT Brands. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Century Casinos and 0 mentions for FAT Brands. Century Casinos' average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat FAT Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Century Casinos is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
FAT Brands	Neutral
Century Casinos	Positive

Summary

Century Casinos beats FAT Brands on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FAT Brands compare to Murano Global BV?

Murano Global BV (NASDAQ:MRNO) and FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FATBB) are both small-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Murano Global BV has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Murano Global BV	N/A	N/A	N/A
FAT Brands	-39.33%	N/A	-17.57%

Murano Global BV has higher revenue and earnings than FAT Brands.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Murano Global BV	$1.14B	0.02	-$14.74M	N/A	N/A
FAT Brands	$574.14M	0.03	-$189.85M	-$13.35	N/A

Murano Global BV has a beta of 0.45, suggesting that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FAT Brands has a beta of 1.03, suggesting that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Murano Global BV had 2 more articles in the media than FAT Brands. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Murano Global BV and 0 mentions for FAT Brands. Murano Global BV's average media sentiment score of 1.43 beat FAT Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Murano Global BV is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Murano Global BV	Positive
FAT Brands	Neutral

11.8% of Murano Global BV shares are owned by institutional investors. 71.2% of Murano Global BV shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 59.9% of FAT Brands shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Murano Global BV	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
FAT Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Summary

Murano Global BV beats FAT Brands on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FAT Brands compare to Ark Restaurants?

FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FATBB) and Ark Restaurants (NASDAQ:ARKR) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and earnings.

In the previous week, Ark Restaurants had 2 more articles in the media than FAT Brands. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Ark Restaurants and 0 mentions for FAT Brands. Ark Restaurants' average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat FAT Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Ark Restaurants is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
FAT Brands	Neutral
Ark Restaurants	Positive

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
FAT Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Ark Restaurants	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Ark Restaurants has a net margin of -3.97% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%. FAT Brands' return on equity of 0.00% beat Ark Restaurants' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
FAT Brands	-39.33%	N/A	-17.57%
Ark Restaurants	-3.97%	-8.49%	-2.09%

32.0% of Ark Restaurants shares are owned by institutional investors. 59.9% of FAT Brands shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 37.5% of Ark Restaurants shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

FAT Brands has a beta of 1.03, suggesting that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ark Restaurants has a beta of 0.32, suggesting that its share price is 68% less volatile than the broader market.

Ark Restaurants has lower revenue, but higher earnings than FAT Brands. Ark Restaurants is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FAT Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
FAT Brands	$574.14M	0.03	-$189.85M	-$13.35	N/A
Ark Restaurants	$165.75M	0.14	-$11.47M	-$1.74	N/A

Summary

Ark Restaurants beats FAT Brands on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FAT Brands compare to Premium Catering?

Premium Catering (NASDAQ:PC) and FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FATBB) are both small-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment and risk.

Premium Catering has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Premium Catering	N/A	N/A	N/A
FAT Brands	-39.33%	N/A	-17.57%

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Premium Catering	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
FAT Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Premium Catering has higher earnings, but lower revenue than FAT Brands.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Premium Catering	$3.35M	5.81	-$4.24M	N/A	N/A
FAT Brands	$574.14M	0.03	-$189.85M	-$13.35	N/A

Premium Catering has a beta of 0.58, meaning that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FAT Brands has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Premium Catering had 1 more articles in the media than FAT Brands. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Premium Catering and 0 mentions for FAT Brands. Premium Catering's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat FAT Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Premium Catering is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Premium Catering	Very Positive
FAT Brands	Neutral

Summary

Premium Catering beats FAT Brands on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get FAT Brands News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FATBB and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

FATBB vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	FAT Brands	RETAIL Industry	Retail Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$15.91M	$11.33B	$26.93B	$12.05B
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.68%	176.82%	5.66%
P/E Ratio	-0.07	28.62	20.49	24.42
Price / Sales	0.03	1.72	4.04	112.54
Price / Cash	N/A	15.57	15.21	37.92
Price / Book	-0.03	4.88	6.27	6.82
Net Income	-$189.85M	$385.35M	$961.79M	$337.56M
7 Day Performance	N/A	7.42%	3.63%	1.16%
1 Month Performance	N/A	7.39%	5.68%	3.16%
1 Year Performance	-65.21%	-8.45%	5.08%	30.60%

FAT Brands Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
FATBB FAT Brands	N/A	$0.89 flat	N/A	N/A	$15.91M	$574.14M	N/A	7,131
GENK GEN Restaurant Group	2.5775 of 5 stars	$2.09 +12.1%	$4.50 +115.3%	-47.9%	$61.40M	$212.54M	N/A	2,700	Gap Up
CNTY Century Casinos	2.6656 of 5 stars	$1.39 -0.7%	$3.00 +115.8%	-34.1%	$39.44M	$572.97M	N/A	3,756
MRNO Murano Global BV	1.4564 of 5 stars	$0.45 +17.1%	N/A	-96.6%	$30.41M	$1.14B	N/A	1,016	Positive News
ARKR Ark Restaurants	0.9636 of 5 stars	$6.22 -1.3%	N/A	-39.2%	$22.72M	$165.75M	N/A	1,566	Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:FATBB) was last updated on 6/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

FAT Brands (FATBB) Competitors

FATBB vs. GENK, CNTY, MRNO, ARKR, and PC

How does FAT Brands compare to GEN Restaurant Group?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Century Casinos?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Murano Global BV?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Ark Restaurants?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Premium Catering?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FATBB vs. The Competition

FAT Brands Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

FAT Brands (FATBB) Competitors

FATBB vs. GENK, CNTY, MRNO, ARKR, and PC

How does FAT Brands compare to GEN Restaurant Group?

Do analysts recommend FATBB or GENK?

Does the media refer more to FATBB or GENK?

Is FATBB or GENK more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of FATBB or GENK?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, FATBB or GENK?

Which has more risk & volatility, FATBB or GENK?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Century Casinos?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of FATBB or CNTY?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, FATBB or CNTY?

Do analysts rate FATBB or CNTY?

Is FATBB or CNTY more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, FATBB or CNTY?

Does the media favor FATBB or CNTY?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Murano Global BV?

Is MRNO or FATBB more profitable?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, MRNO or FATBB?

Which has more volatility and risk, MRNO or FATBB?

Does the media favor MRNO or FATBB?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in MRNO or FATBB?

Do analysts prefer MRNO or FATBB?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Ark Restaurants?

Does the media refer more to FATBB or ARKR?

Do analysts rate FATBB or ARKR?

Is FATBB or ARKR more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of FATBB or ARKR?

Which has more volatility and risk, FATBB or ARKR?

Which has better valuation & earnings, FATBB or ARKR?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Premium Catering?

Is PC or FATBB more profitable?

Do analysts recommend PC or FATBB?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, PC or FATBB?

Which has more risk & volatility, PC or FATBB?

Does the media favor PC or FATBB?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FATBB vs. The Competition

FAT Brands Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools