Do analysts prefer ATLX or FATBB?

Atlas Lithium presently has a consensus price target of $11.50, indicating a potential upside of 483.76%. Given Atlas Lithium's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Atlas Lithium is more favorable than FAT Brands. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Atlas Lithium 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 FAT Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Is ATLX or FATBB more profitable?

Atlas Lithium has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%. FAT Brands' return on equity of 0.00% beat Atlas Lithium's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Atlas Lithium N/A -76.72% -44.33% FAT Brands -39.33% N/A -17.57%

Does the media favor ATLX or FATBB?

In the previous week, Atlas Lithium had 3 more articles in the media than FAT Brands. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Atlas Lithium and 1 mentions for FAT Brands. FAT Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Atlas Lithium's score of -0.03 indicating that FAT Brands is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Atlas Lithium 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 3 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral FAT Brands 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts recommend FATBB or NEXM?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score FAT Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 NexMetals Mining 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Do analysts recommend FATBB or NAMM?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score FAT Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Namib Minerals 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50

Is FATBB or NAMM more profitable?

Namib Minerals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets FAT Brands -39.33% N/A -17.57% Namib Minerals N/A N/A N/A

Does the media prefer FATBB or NAMM?

In the previous week, Namib Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than FAT Brands. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Namib Minerals and 1 mentions for FAT Brands. Namib Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat FAT Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Namib Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment FAT Brands 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Namib Minerals 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer LGO or FATBB?

Largo presently has a consensus price target of $2.10, suggesting a potential upside of 404.81%. Given Largo's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Largo is more favorable than FAT Brands. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Largo 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 FAT Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, LGO or FATBB?

Largo has higher earnings, but lower revenue than FAT Brands. Largo is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FAT Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Largo $127.06M 0.37 -$30.34M -$1.07 N/A FAT Brands $574.14M 0.03 -$189.85M -$13.35 N/A

Is LGO or FATBB more profitable?

Largo has a net margin of -35.10% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%. FAT Brands' return on equity of 0.00% beat Largo's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Largo -35.10% -22.61% -14.29% FAT Brands -39.33% N/A -17.57%

Does the media refer more to LGO or FATBB?

In the previous week, Largo and Largo both had 1 articles in the media. Largo's average media sentiment score of 0.36 beat FAT Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Largo is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Largo 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral FAT Brands 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts rate ELBM or FATBB?

Electra Battery Materials presently has a consensus target price of $2.00, indicating a potential upside of 354.44%. Given Electra Battery Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Electra Battery Materials is more favorable than FAT Brands. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Electra Battery Materials 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.25 FAT Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Does the media favor ELBM or FATBB?

In the previous week, Electra Battery Materials had 4 more articles in the media than FAT Brands. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Electra Battery Materials and 1 mentions for FAT Brands. Electra Battery Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.30 beat FAT Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Electra Battery Materials is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Electra Battery Materials 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral FAT Brands 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

FAT Brands (FATBB) Competitors

$0.89 0.00 (0.00%)

As of 10/13/2026

Compare

FATBB vs. ATLX, NEXM, NAMM, LGO, and ELBM

Should you buy FAT Brands stock or one of its competitors? FAT Brands's main competitors and comparable companies include Atlas Lithium (ATLX), NexMetals Mining (NEXM), Namib Minerals (NAMM), Largo (LGO), and Electra Battery Materials (ELBM). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "metals & mining" industry.

How does FAT Brands compare to Atlas Lithium?

Atlas Lithium (NASDAQ:ATLX) and FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FATBB) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, risk, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

Atlas Lithium presently has a consensus price target of $11.50, indicating a potential upside of 483.76%. Given Atlas Lithium's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Atlas Lithium is more favorable than FAT Brands.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Atlas Lithium	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
FAT Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Atlas Lithium has a beta of 0.13, meaning that its share price is 87% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FAT Brands has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.

Atlas Lithium has higher earnings, but lower revenue than FAT Brands. Atlas Lithium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FAT Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Atlas Lithium	$90K	645.50	-$28.11M	-$1.56	N/A
FAT Brands	$574.14M	0.03	-$189.85M	-$13.35	N/A

Atlas Lithium has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%. FAT Brands' return on equity of 0.00% beat Atlas Lithium's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Atlas Lithium	N/A	-76.72%	-44.33%
FAT Brands	-39.33%	N/A	-17.57%

In the previous week, Atlas Lithium had 3 more articles in the media than FAT Brands. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Atlas Lithium and 1 mentions for FAT Brands. FAT Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Atlas Lithium's score of -0.03 indicating that FAT Brands is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Atlas Lithium	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
FAT Brands	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

18.4% of Atlas Lithium shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.8% of Atlas Lithium shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 59.9% of FAT Brands shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Atlas Lithium beats FAT Brands on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FAT Brands compare to NexMetals Mining?

FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FATBB) and NexMetals Mining (NASDAQ:NEXM) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, risk, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
FAT Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
NexMetals Mining	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

FAT Brands has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NexMetals Mining has a beta of 2.8, meaning that its share price is 180% more volatile than the broader market.

NexMetals Mining has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%. FAT Brands' return on equity of 0.00% beat NexMetals Mining's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
FAT Brands	-39.33%	N/A	-17.57%
NexMetals Mining	N/A	-50.29%	-42.07%

In the previous week, FAT Brands and FAT Brands both had 1 articles in the media. NexMetals Mining's average media sentiment score of 1.18 beat FAT Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that NexMetals Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
FAT Brands	Neutral
NexMetals Mining	Positive

NexMetals Mining has lower revenue, but higher earnings than FAT Brands. NexMetals Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FAT Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
FAT Brands	$574.14M	0.03	-$189.85M	-$13.35	N/A
NexMetals Mining	N/A	N/A	-$42.29M	-$0.78	N/A

Summary

NexMetals Mining beats FAT Brands on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FAT Brands compare to Namib Minerals?

FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FATBB) and Namib Minerals (NASDAQ:NAMM) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

59.5% of Namib Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 59.9% of FAT Brands shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 30.5% of Namib Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Namib Minerals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than FAT Brands. Namib Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FAT Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
FAT Brands	$574.14M	0.03	-$189.85M	-$13.35	N/A
Namib Minerals	$82.60M	0.65	$101.18M	-$0.96	N/A

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
FAT Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Namib Minerals	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50

In the previous week, Namib Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than FAT Brands. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Namib Minerals and 1 mentions for FAT Brands. Namib Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat FAT Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Namib Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
FAT Brands	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Namib Minerals	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

FAT Brands has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Namib Minerals has a beta of 0.01, indicating that its stock price is 99% less volatile than the broader market.

Namib Minerals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
FAT Brands	-39.33%	N/A	-17.57%
Namib Minerals	N/A	N/A	N/A

Summary

Namib Minerals beats FAT Brands on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FAT Brands compare to Largo?

Largo (NYSE:LGO) and FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FATBB) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, risk, dividends, media sentiment and earnings.

Largo has a net margin of -35.10% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%. FAT Brands' return on equity of 0.00% beat Largo's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Largo	-35.10%	-22.61%	-14.29%
FAT Brands	-39.33%	N/A	-17.57%

Largo has a beta of 1.5, meaning that its stock price is 50% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FAT Brands has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Largo and Largo both had 1 articles in the media. Largo's average media sentiment score of 0.36 beat FAT Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Largo is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Largo	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
FAT Brands	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Largo has higher earnings, but lower revenue than FAT Brands. Largo is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FAT Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Largo	$127.06M	0.37	-$30.34M	-$1.07	N/A
FAT Brands	$574.14M	0.03	-$189.85M	-$13.35	N/A

Largo presently has a consensus price target of $2.10, suggesting a potential upside of 404.81%. Given Largo's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Largo is more favorable than FAT Brands.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Largo	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
FAT Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

64.1% of Largo shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Largo shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 59.9% of FAT Brands shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Largo beats FAT Brands on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FAT Brands compare to Electra Battery Materials?

Electra Battery Materials (NASDAQ:ELBM) and FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FATBB) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Electra Battery Materials had 4 more articles in the media than FAT Brands. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Electra Battery Materials and 1 mentions for FAT Brands. Electra Battery Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.30 beat FAT Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Electra Battery Materials is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Electra Battery Materials	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
FAT Brands	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Electra Battery Materials has higher earnings, but lower revenue than FAT Brands. Electra Battery Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FAT Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Electra Battery Materials	N/A	N/A	-$95.52M	-$1.08	N/A
FAT Brands	$574.14M	0.03	-$189.85M	-$13.35	N/A

32.9% of Electra Battery Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.7% of Electra Battery Materials shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 59.9% of FAT Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Electra Battery Materials has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%. Electra Battery Materials' return on equity of 18.21% beat FAT Brands' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Electra Battery Materials	N/A	18.21%	6.93%
FAT Brands	-39.33%	N/A	-17.57%

Electra Battery Materials has a beta of 2.56, indicating that its stock price is 156% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FAT Brands has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.

Electra Battery Materials presently has a consensus target price of $2.00, indicating a potential upside of 354.44%. Given Electra Battery Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Electra Battery Materials is more favorable than FAT Brands.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Electra Battery Materials	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
FAT Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Summary

Electra Battery Materials beats FAT Brands on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get FAT Brands News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FATBB and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

FATBB vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	FAT Brands	Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$15.91M	$3.64B	$4.64B	$12.75B
Dividend Yield	N/A	5.25%	4.78%	19.59%
P/E Ratio	-0.07	23.34	23.25	25.07
Price / Sales	0.03	26,771.60	15,944.31	74.22
Price / Cash	N/A	26.94	24.84	52.75
Price / Book	-0.03	11.59	9.64	5.90
Net Income	-$189.85M	$127.18M	$159.17M	$380.43M
7 Day Performance	N/A	-3.29%	-2.70%	-4.14%
1 Month Performance	N/A	-6.57%	-5.88%	-6.70%
1 Year Performance	-65.48%	8.73%	8.80%	-6.43%

FAT Brands Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
FATBB FAT Brands	0.0105 of 5 stars	$0.89 flat	N/A	N/A	$15.91M	$574.14M	N/A	5,200
ATLX Atlas Lithium	2.2197 of 5 stars	$2.03 -1.9%	$11.50 +466.5%	-73.6%	$59.87M	$90K	N/A	64
NEXM NexMetals Mining	1.2472 of 5 stars	$1.63 -2.5%	N/A	-73.3%	$57.79M	N/A	N/A	204	Positive News
NAMM Namib Minerals	0.6912 of 5 stars	$1.01 -6.9%	N/A	-68.9%	$54.89M	$82.60M	N/A	1,500	Gap Down
LGO Largo	2.7231 of 5 stars	$0.44 -3.3%	$2.10 +382.8%	-83.5%	$49.89M	$127.06M	N/A	500

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:FATBB) was last updated on 10/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

FAT Brands (FATBB) Competitors

FATBB vs. ATLX, NEXM, NAMM, LGO, and ELBM

How does FAT Brands compare to Atlas Lithium?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to NexMetals Mining?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Namib Minerals?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Largo?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Electra Battery Materials?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FATBB vs. The Competition

FAT Brands Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

FAT Brands (FATBB) Competitors

FATBB vs. ATLX, NEXM, NAMM, LGO, and ELBM

How does FAT Brands compare to Atlas Lithium?

Do analysts prefer ATLX or FATBB?

Which has more risk & volatility, ATLX or FATBB?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, ATLX or FATBB?

Is ATLX or FATBB more profitable?

Does the media favor ATLX or FATBB?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in ATLX or FATBB?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to NexMetals Mining?

Do analysts recommend FATBB or NEXM?

Which has more risk and volatility, FATBB or NEXM?

Is FATBB or NEXM more profitable?

Does the media refer more to FATBB or NEXM?

Which has better earnings and valuation, FATBB or NEXM?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Namib Minerals?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in FATBB or NAMM?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, FATBB or NAMM?

Do analysts recommend FATBB or NAMM?

Does the media prefer FATBB or NAMM?

Which has more volatility & risk, FATBB or NAMM?

Is FATBB or NAMM more profitable?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Largo?

Is LGO or FATBB more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, LGO or FATBB?

Does the media refer more to LGO or FATBB?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, LGO or FATBB?

Do analysts prefer LGO or FATBB?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in LGO or FATBB?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Electra Battery Materials?

Does the media favor ELBM or FATBB?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, ELBM or FATBB?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in ELBM or FATBB?

Is ELBM or FATBB more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, ELBM or FATBB?

Do analysts rate ELBM or FATBB?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FATBB vs. The Competition

FAT Brands Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools