BT Brands (BTBD) Competitors

BT Brands logo
$1.07 +0.02 (+1.90%)
As of 10:31 AM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

BTBD vs. MRNO, ARKR, PC, FATBB, and GTIM

Should you buy BT Brands stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares BT Brands with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with BT Brands include Murano Global BV (MRNO), Ark Restaurants (ARKR), Premium Catering (PC), FAT Brands (FATBB), and Good Times Restaurants (GTIM). These companies are all part of the "restaurants, hotels, motels" industry.

How does BT Brands compare to Murano Global BV?

BT Brands (NASDAQ:BTBD) and Murano Global BV (NASDAQ:MRNO) are both small-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends and valuation.

BT Brands has a beta of 0.51, meaning that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Murano Global BV has a beta of 0.45, meaning that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the broader market.

0.4% of BT Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.8% of Murano Global BV shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.6% of BT Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 71.2% of Murano Global BV shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

BT Brands has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Murano Global BV.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BT Brands$13.10M0.51-$690K-$0.17N/A
Murano Global BV$1.14B0.02-$14.74MN/AN/A

In the previous week, BT Brands had 1 more articles in the media than Murano Global BV. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for BT Brands and 0 mentions for Murano Global BV. BT Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Murano Global BV's score of 0.00 indicating that BT Brands is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
BT Brands Positive
Murano Global BV Neutral

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
BT Brands
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Murano Global BV
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Murano Global BV has a net margin of 0.00% compared to BT Brands' net margin of -8.47%. Murano Global BV's return on equity of 0.00% beat BT Brands' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BT Brands-8.47% -16.67% -10.11%
Murano Global BV N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Murano Global BV beats BT Brands on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does BT Brands compare to Ark Restaurants?

BT Brands (NASDAQ:BTBD) and Ark Restaurants (NASDAQ:ARKR) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations and earnings.

0.4% of BT Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.0% of Ark Restaurants shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.6% of BT Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 37.5% of Ark Restaurants shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

BT Brands has a beta of 0.51, meaning that its share price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ark Restaurants has a beta of 0.32, meaning that its share price is 68% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, BT Brands and BT Brands both had 1 articles in the media. BT Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Ark Restaurants' score of 0.00 indicating that BT Brands is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
BT Brands
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Ark Restaurants
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
BT Brands
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Ark Restaurants
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

BT Brands has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Ark Restaurants. BT Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ark Restaurants, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BT Brands$13.10M0.51-$690K-$0.17N/A
Ark Restaurants$158.37M0.14-$11.47M-$1.74N/A

Ark Restaurants has a net margin of -3.97% compared to BT Brands' net margin of -8.47%. Ark Restaurants' return on equity of -8.49% beat BT Brands' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BT Brands-8.47% -16.67% -10.11%
Ark Restaurants -3.97%-8.49%-2.09%

Summary

Ark Restaurants beats BT Brands on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does BT Brands compare to Premium Catering?

Premium Catering (NASDAQ:PC) and BT Brands (NASDAQ:BTBD) are both small-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Premium Catering has a beta of 0.58, meaning that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BT Brands has a beta of 0.51, meaning that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Premium Catering
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
BT Brands
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, Premium Catering and Premium Catering both had 1 articles in the media. BT Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Premium Catering's score of 0.00 indicating that BT Brands is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Premium Catering
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
BT Brands
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

BT Brands has higher revenue and earnings than Premium Catering.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Premium Catering$3.35M5.81-$4.24MN/AN/A
BT Brands$13.10M0.51-$690K-$0.17N/A

0.4% of BT Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.6% of BT Brands shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Premium Catering has a net margin of 0.00% compared to BT Brands' net margin of -8.47%. Premium Catering's return on equity of 0.00% beat BT Brands' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Premium CateringN/A N/A N/A
BT Brands -8.47%-16.67%-10.11%

Summary

Premium Catering and BT Brands tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does BT Brands compare to FAT Brands?

FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FATBB) and BT Brands (NASDAQ:BTBD) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk and earnings.

0.4% of BT Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 59.9% of FAT Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.6% of BT Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FAT Brands
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
BT Brands
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

BT Brands has lower revenue, but higher earnings than FAT Brands. BT Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FAT Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FAT Brands$574.14M0.03-$189.85M-$13.35N/A
BT Brands$13.10M0.51-$690K-$0.17N/A

In the previous week, BT Brands had 1 more articles in the media than FAT Brands. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for BT Brands and 0 mentions for FAT Brands. BT Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat FAT Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that BT Brands is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
FAT Brands Neutral
BT Brands Positive

BT Brands has a net margin of -8.47% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%. FAT Brands' return on equity of 0.00% beat BT Brands' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FAT Brands-39.33% N/A -17.57%
BT Brands -8.47%-16.67%-10.11%

FAT Brands has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BT Brands has a beta of 0.51, meaning that its share price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

BT Brands beats FAT Brands on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does BT Brands compare to Good Times Restaurants?

Good Times Restaurants (NASDAQ:GTIM) and BT Brands (NASDAQ:BTBD) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings and profitability.

In the previous week, BT Brands had 1 more articles in the media than Good Times Restaurants. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for BT Brands and 0 mentions for Good Times Restaurants. BT Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Good Times Restaurants' score of 0.00 indicating that BT Brands is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Good Times Restaurants Neutral
BT Brands Positive

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Good Times Restaurants
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
BT Brands
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Good Times Restaurants has a net margin of 1.32% compared to BT Brands' net margin of -8.47%. Good Times Restaurants' return on equity of 5.34% beat BT Brands' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Good Times Restaurants1.32% 5.34% 2.18%
BT Brands -8.47%-16.67%-10.11%

12.1% of Good Times Restaurants shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.4% of BT Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 26.5% of Good Times Restaurants shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 19.6% of BT Brands shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Good Times Restaurants has a beta of 0.64, indicating that its stock price is 36% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BT Brands has a beta of 0.51, indicating that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

Good Times Restaurants has higher revenue and earnings than BT Brands. BT Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Good Times Restaurants, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Good Times Restaurants$141.63M0.10$1.02M$0.177.96
BT Brands$13.10M0.51-$690K-$0.17N/A

Summary

Good Times Restaurants beats BT Brands on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get BT Brands News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BTBD and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BTBD and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BTBD vs. The Competition

MetricBT BrandsRETAIL IndustryRetail SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$6.62M$11.01B$26.53B$12.14B
Dividend YieldN/A2.69%175.39%5.83%
P/E Ratio-6.2927.9420.3124.06
Price / Sales0.511.662.18123.81
Price / CashN/A15.0814.6754.51
Price / Book1.034.816.226.51
Net Income-$690K$385.35M$962.92M$337.03M
7 Day Performance-6.14%0.06%1.35%0.10%
1 Month Performance-8.55%5.46%2.37%1.07%
1 Year Performance-11.28%-10.68%0.70%28.66%

BT Brands Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BTBD
BT Brands
0.7462 of 5 stars
$1.07
+1.9%
N/A-14.7%$6.62M$13.10MN/A110
MRNO
Murano Global BV
0.7026 of 5 stars
$0.29
-1.4%
N/A-97.4%$22.92M$59.49MN/A1,016
ARKR
Ark Restaurants
0.4923 of 5 stars
$6.20
-2.1%
N/A-33.8%$22.83M$165.75MN/A1,566
PC
Premium Catering
0.1029 of 5 stars
$9.40
flat
N/AN/A$19.48M$3.35MN/A45
FATBB
FAT Brands
N/A$0.89
flat
N/AN/A$15.91M$574.14MN/A7,131

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:BTBD) was last updated on 6/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners