Go Pro

BT Brands (BTBD) Competitors

BT Brands logo
$1.16 +0.05 (+4.88%)
As of 03:07 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

BTBD vs. ARKR, PC, MRNO, FATBB, and GTIM

Should you buy BT Brands stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares BT Brands with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with BT Brands include Ark Restaurants (ARKR), Premium Catering (PC), Murano Global BV (MRNO), FAT Brands (FATBB), and Good Times Restaurants (GTIM). These companies are all part of the "restaurants, hotels, motels" industry.

How does BT Brands compare to Ark Restaurants?

BT Brands (NASDAQ:BTBD) and Ark Restaurants (NASDAQ:ARKR) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
BT Brands
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Ark Restaurants
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, BT Brands had 2 more articles in the media than Ark Restaurants. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for BT Brands and 1 mentions for Ark Restaurants. Ark Restaurants' average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat BT Brands' score of 0.30 indicating that Ark Restaurants is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
BT Brands Neutral
Ark Restaurants Very Positive

Ark Restaurants has a net margin of -3.97% compared to BT Brands' net margin of -8.47%. Ark Restaurants' return on equity of -8.49% beat BT Brands' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BT Brands-8.47% -16.67% -10.11%
Ark Restaurants -3.97%-8.49%-2.09%

0.4% of BT Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.0% of Ark Restaurants shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.6% of BT Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 37.5% of Ark Restaurants shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

BT Brands has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Ark Restaurants. BT Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ark Restaurants, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BT Brands$13.49M0.53-$690K-$0.17N/A
Ark Restaurants$165.75M0.13-$11.47M-$1.74N/A

BT Brands has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ark Restaurants has a beta of 0.33, indicating that its share price is 67% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Ark Restaurants beats BT Brands on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does BT Brands compare to Premium Catering?

Premium Catering (NASDAQ:PC) and BT Brands (NASDAQ:BTBD) are both small-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

0.4% of BT Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.6% of BT Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Premium Catering has a net margin of 0.00% compared to BT Brands' net margin of -8.47%. Premium Catering's return on equity of 0.00% beat BT Brands' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Premium CateringN/A N/A N/A
BT Brands -8.47%-16.67%-10.11%

BT Brands has higher revenue and earnings than Premium Catering.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Premium Catering$4.29M4.54-$4.24MN/AN/A
BT Brands$13.49M0.53-$690K-$0.17N/A

In the previous week, BT Brands had 2 more articles in the media than Premium Catering. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for BT Brands and 1 mentions for Premium Catering. Premium Catering's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat BT Brands' score of 0.30 indicating that Premium Catering is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Premium Catering Very Positive
BT Brands Neutral

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Premium Catering
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
BT Brands
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Premium Catering has a beta of 0.56, indicating that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BT Brands has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Premium Catering beats BT Brands on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does BT Brands compare to Murano Global BV?

Murano Global BV (NASDAQ:MRNO) and BT Brands (NASDAQ:BTBD) are both small-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and dividends.

In the previous week, BT Brands had 2 more articles in the media than Murano Global BV. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for BT Brands and 1 mentions for Murano Global BV. Murano Global BV's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat BT Brands' score of 0.30 indicating that Murano Global BV is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Murano Global BV Very Positive
BT Brands Neutral

Murano Global BV has a beta of 0.51, meaning that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BT Brands has a beta of 0.52, meaning that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Murano Global BV
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
BT Brands
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

BT Brands has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Murano Global BV.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Murano Global BV$59.49M0.35-$14.74MN/AN/A
BT Brands$13.49M0.53-$690K-$0.17N/A

11.8% of Murano Global BV shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.4% of BT Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 71.2% of Murano Global BV shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 19.6% of BT Brands shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Murano Global BV has a net margin of 0.00% compared to BT Brands' net margin of -8.47%. Murano Global BV's return on equity of 0.00% beat BT Brands' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Murano Global BVN/A N/A N/A
BT Brands -8.47%-16.67%-10.11%

Summary

Murano Global BV beats BT Brands on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does BT Brands compare to FAT Brands?

FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FATBB) and BT Brands (NASDAQ:BTBD) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, risk and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, BT Brands had 3 more articles in the media than FAT Brands. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for BT Brands and 0 mentions for FAT Brands. BT Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.30 beat FAT Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that BT Brands is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
FAT Brands Neutral
BT Brands Neutral

0.4% of BT Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 59.9% of FAT Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.6% of BT Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

BT Brands has lower revenue, but higher earnings than FAT Brands. BT Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FAT Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FAT Brands$574.14M0.03-$189.85M-$13.35N/A
BT Brands$13.49M0.53-$690K-$0.17N/A

FAT Brands has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BT Brands has a beta of 0.52, meaning that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FAT Brands
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
BT Brands
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

BT Brands has a net margin of -8.47% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%. FAT Brands' return on equity of 0.00% beat BT Brands' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FAT Brands-39.33% N/A -17.57%
BT Brands -8.47%-16.67%-10.11%

Summary

BT Brands beats FAT Brands on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does BT Brands compare to Good Times Restaurants?

Good Times Restaurants (NASDAQ:GTIM) and BT Brands (NASDAQ:BTBD) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and earnings.

Good Times Restaurants has a net margin of 1.32% compared to BT Brands' net margin of -8.47%. Good Times Restaurants' return on equity of 5.34% beat BT Brands' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Good Times Restaurants1.32% 5.34% 2.18%
BT Brands -8.47%-16.67%-10.11%

Good Times Restaurants has higher revenue and earnings than BT Brands. BT Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Good Times Restaurants, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Good Times Restaurants$136.96M0.11$1.02M$0.178.26
BT Brands$13.49M0.53-$690K-$0.17N/A

Good Times Restaurants has a beta of 0.63, meaning that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BT Brands has a beta of 0.52, meaning that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Good Times Restaurants
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
BT Brands
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

12.1% of Good Times Restaurants shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.4% of BT Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 26.5% of Good Times Restaurants shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.6% of BT Brands shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Good Times Restaurants and Good Times Restaurants both had 3 articles in the media. Good Times Restaurants' average media sentiment score of 1.22 beat BT Brands' score of 0.30 indicating that Good Times Restaurants is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Good Times Restaurants
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
BT Brands
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Good Times Restaurants beats BT Brands on 11 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get BT Brands News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BTBD and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BTBD and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BTBD vs. The Competition

MetricBT BrandsRETAIL IndustryRetail SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$7.17M$11.20B$26.85B$12.55B
Dividend YieldN/A2.56%175.38%8.00%
P/E Ratio-6.8227.7520.8224.38
Price / Sales0.531.723.49117.90
Price / CashN/A14.9818.1849.36
Price / Book1.124.816.466.35
Net Income-$690K$388.37M$951.67M$330.89M
7 Day Performance8.41%-0.73%-0.51%-0.97%
1 Month PerformanceN/A0.02%-1.68%-0.36%
1 Year Performance-9.30%-9.65%-3.59%20.00%

BT Brands Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BTBD
BT Brands
0.2984 of 5 stars
$1.16
+4.9%
N/A-9.6%$7.17M$13.49MN/A110
ARKR
Ark Restaurants
1.2224 of 5 stars
$5.85
-2.2%
N/A-33.9%$21.57M$165.75MN/A1,566
PC
Premium Catering
0.3997 of 5 stars
$9.40
flat
N/AN/A$19.48M$3.35MN/A45
MRNO
Murano Global BV
1.4728 of 5 stars
$0.24
-0.3%
N/A-97.3%$19.35M$1.14BN/A1,016
FATBB
FAT Brands
N/A$0.89
flat
N/AN/A$15.91M$574.14MN/A7,131

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:BTBD) was last updated on 7/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners