Do analysts prefer ZKIN or FAT?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score ZK International Group 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 FAT Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.67

Which has better valuation and earnings, ZKIN or FAT?

ZK International Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than FAT Brands. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio ZK International Group $71.24M 0.09 -$3.98M N/A N/A FAT Brands $574.14M 0.01 -$189.85M -$13.35 N/A

Is ZKIN or FAT more profitable?

ZK International Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets ZK International Group N/A N/A N/A FAT Brands -39.33% N/A -17.99%

Do analysts prefer FAT or BGL?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score FAT Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.67 Blue Gold 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, FAT or BGL?

Blue Gold has lower revenue, but higher earnings than FAT Brands. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio FAT Brands $574.14M 0.01 -$189.85M -$13.35 N/A Blue Gold N/A N/A -$21.91M N/A N/A

Is FAT or BGL more profitable?

Blue Gold has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets FAT Brands -39.33% N/A -17.99% Blue Gold N/A N/A N/A

Do analysts rate FAT or CHNR?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score FAT Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.67 China Natural Resources 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has higher valuation and earnings, FAT or CHNR?

China Natural Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than FAT Brands. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio FAT Brands $574.14M 0.01 -$189.85M -$13.35 N/A China Natural Resources N/A N/A -$180K N/A N/A

Is FAT or CHNR more profitable?

China Natural Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets FAT Brands -39.33% N/A -17.99% China Natural Resources N/A N/A N/A

Do analysts recommend FAT or AUMN?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score FAT Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.67 Golden Minerals 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Is FAT or AUMN more profitable?

Golden Minerals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%. FAT Brands' return on equity of 0.00% beat Golden Minerals' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets FAT Brands -39.33% N/A -17.99% Golden Minerals N/A -1,051.75% -57.22%

Do analysts prefer FAT or ASTLW?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score FAT Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.67 Algoma Steel Group 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has better valuation & earnings, FAT or ASTLW?

Algoma Steel Group has higher revenue and earnings than FAT Brands. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio FAT Brands $574.14M 0.01 -$189.85M -$13.35 N/A Algoma Steel Group $1.54B N/A N/A N/A N/A

Is FAT or ASTLW more profitable?

Algoma Steel Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets FAT Brands -39.33% N/A -17.99% Algoma Steel Group N/A N/A N/A

FAT Brands (FAT) Competitors

$0.16 0.00 (0.00%)

As of 08/14/2026

Compare

FAT vs. ZKIN, BGL, CHNR, AUMN, and ASTLW

Should you buy FAT Brands stock or one of its competitors? FAT Brands's main competitors and comparable companies include ZK International Group (ZKIN), Blue Gold (BGL), China Natural Resources (CHNR), Golden Minerals (AUMN), and Algoma Steel Group (ASTLW). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "metals & mining" industry.

How does FAT Brands compare to ZK International Group?

ZK International Group (NASDAQ:ZKIN) and FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FAT) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership and risk.

In the previous week, ZK International Group had 1 more articles in the media than FAT Brands. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for ZK International Group and 0 mentions for FAT Brands. ZK International Group's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat FAT Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that ZK International Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
ZK International Group	Very Positive
FAT Brands	Neutral

0.3% of ZK International Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.9% of FAT Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 29.8% of ZK International Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.7% of FAT Brands shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

ZK International Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than FAT Brands.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
ZK International Group	$71.24M	0.09	-$3.98M	N/A	N/A
FAT Brands	$574.14M	0.01	-$189.85M	-$13.35	N/A

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
ZK International Group	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
FAT Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.67

ZK International Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
ZK International Group	N/A	N/A	N/A
FAT Brands	-39.33%	N/A	-17.99%

ZK International Group has a beta of 2.26, suggesting that its stock price is 126% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FAT Brands has a beta of 1.34, suggesting that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

ZK International Group beats FAT Brands on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FAT Brands compare to Blue Gold?

FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FAT) and Blue Gold (NASDAQ:BGL) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and dividends.

Blue Gold has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
FAT Brands	-39.33%	N/A	-17.99%
Blue Gold	N/A	N/A	N/A

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
FAT Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.67
Blue Gold	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

In the previous week, Blue Gold had 4 more articles in the media than FAT Brands. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Blue Gold and 0 mentions for FAT Brands. Blue Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat FAT Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Blue Gold is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
FAT Brands	Neutral
Blue Gold	Positive

Blue Gold has lower revenue, but higher earnings than FAT Brands.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
FAT Brands	$574.14M	0.01	-$189.85M	-$13.35	N/A
Blue Gold	N/A	N/A	-$21.91M	N/A	N/A

6.9% of FAT Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.6% of Blue Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.7% of FAT Brands shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 19.9% of Blue Gold shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

FAT Brands has a beta of 1.34, indicating that its share price is 34% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Blue Gold has a beta of 3.47, indicating that its share price is 247% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Blue Gold beats FAT Brands on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FAT Brands compare to China Natural Resources?

FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FAT) and China Natural Resources (NASDAQ:CHNR) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

6.9% of FAT Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of China Natural Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.7% of FAT Brands shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 23.2% of China Natural Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

China Natural Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
FAT Brands	-39.33%	N/A	-17.99%
China Natural Resources	N/A	N/A	N/A

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
FAT Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.67
China Natural Resources	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

In the previous week, China Natural Resources had 3 more articles in the media than FAT Brands. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for China Natural Resources and 0 mentions for FAT Brands. China Natural Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat FAT Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that China Natural Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
FAT Brands	Neutral
China Natural Resources	Positive

FAT Brands has a beta of 1.34, indicating that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, China Natural Resources has a beta of 0.09, indicating that its stock price is 91% less volatile than the broader market.

China Natural Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than FAT Brands.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
FAT Brands	$574.14M	0.01	-$189.85M	-$13.35	N/A
China Natural Resources	N/A	N/A	-$180K	N/A	N/A

Summary

China Natural Resources beats FAT Brands on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FAT Brands compare to Golden Minerals?

FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FAT) and Golden Minerals (NYSE:AUMN) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, profitability, earnings and risk.

6.9% of FAT Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.4% of Golden Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 15.7% of FAT Brands shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.8% of Golden Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Golden Minerals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than FAT Brands. Golden Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FAT Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
FAT Brands	$574.14M	0.01	-$189.85M	-$13.35	N/A
Golden Minerals	$300K	10.70	-$9.23M	-$0.12	N/A

Golden Minerals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%. FAT Brands' return on equity of 0.00% beat Golden Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
FAT Brands	-39.33%	N/A	-17.99%
Golden Minerals	N/A	-1,051.75%	-57.22%

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
FAT Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.67
Golden Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

FAT Brands has a beta of 1.34, suggesting that its share price is 34% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Golden Minerals has a beta of -0.77, suggesting that its share price is 177% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, FAT Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Golden Minerals'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
FAT Brands	Neutral
Golden Minerals	Neutral

Summary

FAT Brands beats Golden Minerals on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FAT Brands compare to Algoma Steel Group?

FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FAT) and Algoma Steel Group (NASDAQ:ASTLW) are both materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, earnings, dividends and risk.

FAT Brands pays an annual dividend of $0.14 per share and has a dividend yield of 86.1%. Algoma Steel Group pays an annual dividend of $0.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 724.6%. FAT Brands pays out -1.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

In the previous week, Algoma Steel Group had 3 more articles in the media than FAT Brands. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Algoma Steel Group and 0 mentions for FAT Brands. Algoma Steel Group's average media sentiment score of 0.44 beat FAT Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Algoma Steel Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
FAT Brands	Neutral
Algoma Steel Group	Neutral

Algoma Steel Group has higher revenue and earnings than FAT Brands.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
FAT Brands	$574.14M	0.01	-$189.85M	-$13.35	N/A
Algoma Steel Group	$1.54B	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
FAT Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.67
Algoma Steel Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

6.9% of FAT Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.7% of FAT Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Algoma Steel Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
FAT Brands	-39.33%	N/A	-17.99%
Algoma Steel Group	N/A	N/A	N/A

Summary

Algoma Steel Group beats FAT Brands on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get FAT Brands News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FAT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

FAT vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	FAT Brands	Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$2.92M	$3.79B	$4.86B	$13.06B
Dividend Yield	N/A	5.22%	4.71%	10.62%
P/E Ratio	-0.01	20.17	23.02	21.75
Price / Sales	0.01	7,931.68	4,718.53	94.07
Price / Cash	N/A	26.57	24.65	38.47
Price / Book	-0.01	10.50	8.86	6.51
Net Income	-$189.85M	$122.18M	$154.79M	$347.22M
7 Day Performance	N/A	0.76%	0.47%	1.51%
1 Month Performance	N/A	11.63%	9.14%	2.74%
1 Year Performance	-91.75%	56.08%	44.00%	21.07%

FAT Brands Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
FAT FAT Brands	0.1068 of 5 stars	$0.16 flat	N/A	N/A	$2.92M	$574.14M	N/A	7,131
ZKIN ZK International Group	1.4181 of 5 stars	$1.09 -1.4%	N/A	-44.8%	$7.17M	$71.24M	N/A	270	Positive News
BGL Blue Gold	1.2094 of 5 stars	$0.21 +9.5%	N/A	N/A	$7.13M	N/A	N/A	N/A	Short Interest Decrease
CHNR China Natural Resources	0.6821 of 5 stars	$4.06 +2.3%	N/A	+19.6%	$5.12M	N/A	N/A	80	Short Interest Increase Gap Up
AUMN Golden Minerals	N/A	$0.22 +0.5%	N/A	-6.7%	$3.35M	$300K	N/A	250	Gap Down

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:FAT) was last updated on 8/17/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

FAT Brands (FAT) Competitors

FAT vs. ZKIN, BGL, CHNR, AUMN, and ASTLW

How does FAT Brands compare to ZK International Group?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Blue Gold?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to China Natural Resources?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Golden Minerals?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Algoma Steel Group?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FAT vs. The Competition

FAT Brands Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

FAT Brands (FAT) Competitors

FAT vs. ZKIN, BGL, CHNR, AUMN, and ASTLW

How does FAT Brands compare to ZK International Group?

Does the media favor ZKIN or FAT?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of ZKIN or FAT?

Which has better valuation and earnings, ZKIN or FAT?

Do analysts prefer ZKIN or FAT?

Is ZKIN or FAT more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, ZKIN or FAT?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Blue Gold?

Is FAT or BGL more profitable?

Do analysts prefer FAT or BGL?

Does the media prefer FAT or BGL?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, FAT or BGL?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in FAT or BGL?

Which has more risk & volatility, FAT or BGL?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to China Natural Resources?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in FAT or CHNR?

Is FAT or CHNR more profitable?

Do analysts rate FAT or CHNR?

Does the media prefer FAT or CHNR?

Which has more volatility and risk, FAT or CHNR?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, FAT or CHNR?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Golden Minerals?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in FAT or AUMN?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, FAT or AUMN?

Is FAT or AUMN more profitable?

Do analysts recommend FAT or AUMN?

Which has more volatility and risk, FAT or AUMN?

Does the media prefer FAT or AUMN?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Algoma Steel Group?

Is FAT or ASTLW a better dividend stock?

Does the media favor FAT or ASTLW?

Which has better valuation & earnings, FAT or ASTLW?

Do analysts prefer FAT or ASTLW?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of FAT or ASTLW?

Is FAT or ASTLW more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FAT vs. The Competition

FAT Brands Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools