Free Trial

FAT Brands (FAT) Competitors

FAT Brands logo
$0.16 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 05/26/2026

FAT vs. YOSH, CCHH, BTBD, PNST, and SDOT

Should you buy FAT Brands stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares FAT Brands with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with FAT Brands include Yoshiharu Global (YOSH), CCH (CCHH), BT Brands (BTBD), Pinstripes (PNST), and Sadot Group (SDOT). These companies are all part of the "restaurants, hotels, motels" industry.

How does FAT Brands compare to Yoshiharu Global?

FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FAT) and Yoshiharu Global (NASDAQ:YOSH) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Yoshiharu Global has lower revenue, but higher earnings than FAT Brands. Yoshiharu Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FAT Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FAT Brands$574.14M0.01-$189.85M-$13.35N/A
Yoshiharu Global$13.90M0.48-$2.67M-$1.37N/A

In the previous week, FAT Brands and FAT Brands both had 2 articles in the media. FAT Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Yoshiharu Global'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
FAT Brands
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Yoshiharu Global
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

FAT Brands has a beta of 1.34, suggesting that its share price is 34% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Yoshiharu Global has a beta of 0.25, suggesting that its share price is 75% less volatile than the broader market.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FAT Brands
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67
Yoshiharu Global
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

6.9% of FAT Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 15.7% of FAT Brands shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 42.6% of Yoshiharu Global shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Yoshiharu Global has a net margin of -23.83% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%. FAT Brands' return on equity of 0.00% beat Yoshiharu Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FAT Brands-39.33% N/A -17.99%
Yoshiharu Global -23.83%-152.58%-18.17%

Summary

FAT Brands beats Yoshiharu Global on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FAT Brands compare to CCH?

FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FAT) and CCH (NASDAQ:CCHH) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, FAT Brands had 1 more articles in the media than CCH. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for FAT Brands and 1 mentions for CCH. FAT Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat CCH's score of -0.15 indicating that FAT Brands is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
FAT Brands
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
CCH
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FAT Brands
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67
CCH
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

CCH has lower revenue, but higher earnings than FAT Brands.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FAT Brands$574.14M0.01-$189.85M-$13.35N/A
CCH$9.59M0.95N/AN/AN/A

6.9% of FAT Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 15.7% of FAT Brands shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

CCH has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FAT Brands-39.33% N/A -17.99%
CCH N/A N/A N/A

Summary

FAT Brands beats CCH on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FAT Brands compare to BT Brands?

FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FAT) and BT Brands (NASDAQ:BTBD) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

BT Brands has a net margin of -8.47% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%. FAT Brands' return on equity of 0.00% beat BT Brands' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FAT Brands-39.33% N/A -17.99%
BT Brands -8.47%-16.67%-10.11%

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FAT Brands
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67
BT Brands
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

FAT Brands has a beta of 1.34, suggesting that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BT Brands has a beta of 0.66, suggesting that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, FAT Brands had 1 more articles in the media than BT Brands. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for FAT Brands and 1 mentions for BT Brands. BT Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat FAT Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that BT Brands is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
FAT Brands
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
BT Brands
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

6.9% of FAT Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.4% of BT Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 15.7% of FAT Brands shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.6% of BT Brands shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

BT Brands has lower revenue, but higher earnings than FAT Brands. BT Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FAT Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FAT Brands$574.14M0.01-$189.85M-$13.35N/A
BT Brands$13.49M0.51-$690K-$0.17N/A

Summary

FAT Brands and BT Brands tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FAT Brands compare to Pinstripes?

FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FAT) and Pinstripes (NYSE:PNST) are both small-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, profitability and media sentiment.

Pinstripes has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FAT Brands-39.33% N/A -17.99%
Pinstripes N/A N/A N/A

Given Pinstripes' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Pinstripes is more favorable than FAT Brands.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FAT Brands
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67
Pinstripes
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

FAT Brands has a beta of 1.34, indicating that its share price is 34% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pinstripes has a beta of 0.84, indicating that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

6.9% of FAT Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 56.8% of Pinstripes shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.7% of FAT Brands shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 32.4% of Pinstripes shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, FAT Brands had 2 more articles in the media than Pinstripes. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for FAT Brands and 0 mentions for Pinstripes. FAT Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Pinstripes'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
FAT Brands Neutral
Pinstripes Neutral

Pinstripes has lower revenue, but higher earnings than FAT Brands. FAT Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pinstripes, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FAT Brands$574.14M0.01-$189.85M-$13.35N/A
Pinstripes$128.79M0.00-$6.79M-$0.63N/A

Summary

Pinstripes beats FAT Brands on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FAT Brands compare to Sadot Group?

FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FAT) and Sadot Group (NASDAQ:SDOT) are both small-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, risk, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Sadot Group had 1 more articles in the media than FAT Brands. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Sadot Group and 2 mentions for FAT Brands. FAT Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Sadot Group's score of -0.50 indicating that FAT Brands is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
FAT Brands
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Sadot Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative

FAT Brands has a beta of 1.34, indicating that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sadot Group has a beta of 0.75, indicating that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market.

Sadot Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than FAT Brands. Sadot Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FAT Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FAT Brands$574.14M0.01-$189.85M-$13.35N/A
Sadot Group$114.80M0.05-$93.39M-$14.98N/A

6.9% of FAT Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.3% of Sadot Group shares are held by institutional investors. 15.7% of FAT Brands shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Sadot Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FAT Brands
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67
Sadot Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Sadot Group has a net margin of -37.82% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%. FAT Brands' return on equity of 0.00% beat Sadot Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FAT Brands-39.33% N/A -17.99%
Sadot Group -37.82%-963.54%-188.85%

Summary

FAT Brands beats Sadot Group on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get FAT Brands News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FAT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FAT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FAT vs. The Competition

MetricFAT BrandsRETAIL IndustryRetail SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$2.92M$11.10B$27.14B$12.47B
Dividend YieldN/A2.71%178.40%5.27%
P/E Ratio-0.0127.3720.5525.88
Price / Sales0.011.633.8969.69
Price / CashN/A14.7014.9556.67
Price / Book-0.014.745.327.15
Net Income-$189.85M$392.93M$962.00M$337.22M
7 Day PerformanceN/A1.93%2.97%3.40%
1 Month PerformanceN/A0.05%1.71%3.51%
1 Year Performance-93.20%-9.97%1.47%36.52%

FAT Brands Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FAT
FAT Brands
0.1336 of 5 stars
$0.16
flat
N/AN/A$2.92M$574.14MN/A7,131
YOSH
Yoshiharu Global
N/A$0.59
+18.2%
N/A-89.0%$8.39M$13.90MN/A130
CCHH
CCH
N/A$0.41
+6.6%
N/AN/A$7.80M$9.77MN/A190
BTBD
BT Brands
0.9082 of 5 stars
$1.13
+3.7%
N/A-14.5%$6.96M$13.49MN/A110
PNST
Pinstripes
N/AN/AN/AN/A$1.70M$128.79MN/A1,200

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:FAT) was last updated on 5/27/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners