Do analysts prefer FAT or HUDI?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score FAT Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.67 Huadi International Group 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has better valuation & earnings, FAT or HUDI?

Huadi International Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than FAT Brands. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio FAT Brands $574.14M 0.01 -$189.85M -$13.35 N/A Huadi International Group $62.49M 0.18 -$1.40M N/A N/A

Is FAT or HUDI more profitable?

Huadi International Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets FAT Brands -39.33% N/A -17.99% Huadi International Group N/A N/A N/A

Do analysts prefer FAT or ZKIN?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score FAT Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.67 ZK International Group 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has better valuation & earnings, FAT or ZKIN?

ZK International Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than FAT Brands. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio FAT Brands $574.14M 0.01 -$189.85M -$13.35 N/A ZK International Group $71.24M 0.11 -$3.98M N/A N/A

Is FAT or ZKIN more profitable?

ZK International Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets FAT Brands -39.33% N/A -17.99% ZK International Group N/A N/A N/A

Do analysts prefer FAT or BGL?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score FAT Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.67 Blue Gold 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, FAT or BGL?

Blue Gold has lower revenue, but higher earnings than FAT Brands. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio FAT Brands $574.14M 0.01 -$189.85M -$13.35 N/A Blue Gold N/A N/A -$21.91M N/A N/A

Is FAT or BGL more profitable?

Blue Gold has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets FAT Brands -39.33% N/A -17.99% Blue Gold N/A N/A N/A

Do analysts rate FAT or CHNR?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score FAT Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.67 China Natural Resources 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, FAT or CHNR?

China Natural Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than FAT Brands. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio FAT Brands $574.14M 0.01 -$189.85M -$13.35 N/A China Natural Resources N/A N/A -$180K N/A N/A

Is FAT or CHNR more profitable?

China Natural Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets FAT Brands -39.33% N/A -17.99% China Natural Resources N/A N/A N/A

Do analysts recommend AUMN or FAT?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Golden Minerals 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 FAT Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.67

Is AUMN or FAT more profitable?

Golden Minerals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%. FAT Brands' return on equity of 0.00% beat Golden Minerals' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Golden Minerals N/A -1,051.75% -57.22% FAT Brands -39.33% N/A -17.99%

FAT Brands (FAT) Competitors

$0.16 0.00 (0.00%)

As of 09/4/2026

Compare

FAT vs. HUDI, ZKIN, BGL, CHNR, and AUMN

Should you buy FAT Brands stock or one of its competitors? FAT Brands's main competitors and comparable companies include Huadi International Group (HUDI), ZK International Group (ZKIN), Blue Gold (BGL), China Natural Resources (CHNR), and Golden Minerals (AUMN). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "metals & mining" industry.

How does FAT Brands compare to Huadi International Group?

FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FAT) and Huadi International Group (NASDAQ:HUDI) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Huadi International Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
FAT Brands	-39.33%	N/A	-17.99%
Huadi International Group	N/A	N/A	N/A

FAT Brands has a beta of 1.34, indicating that its share price is 34% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Huadi International Group has a beta of 1.98, indicating that its share price is 98% more volatile than the broader market.

6.9% of FAT Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of Huadi International Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.7% of FAT Brands shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, FAT Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Huadi International Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
FAT Brands	Neutral
Huadi International Group	Neutral

Huadi International Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than FAT Brands.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
FAT Brands	$574.14M	0.01	-$189.85M	-$13.35	N/A
Huadi International Group	$62.49M	0.18	-$1.40M	N/A	N/A

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
FAT Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.67
Huadi International Group	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Summary

Huadi International Group beats FAT Brands on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FAT Brands compare to ZK International Group?

FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FAT) and ZK International Group (NASDAQ:ZKIN) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, FAT Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled ZK International Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
FAT Brands	Neutral
ZK International Group	Neutral

ZK International Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than FAT Brands.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
FAT Brands	$574.14M	0.01	-$189.85M	-$13.35	N/A
ZK International Group	$71.24M	0.11	-$3.98M	N/A	N/A

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
FAT Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.67
ZK International Group	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

6.9% of FAT Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of ZK International Group shares are held by institutional investors. 15.7% of FAT Brands shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 29.8% of ZK International Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

FAT Brands has a beta of 1.34, suggesting that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ZK International Group has a beta of 2.23, suggesting that its stock price is 123% more volatile than the broader market.

ZK International Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
FAT Brands	-39.33%	N/A	-17.99%
ZK International Group	N/A	N/A	N/A

Summary

ZK International Group beats FAT Brands on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FAT Brands compare to Blue Gold?

FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FAT) and Blue Gold (NASDAQ:BGL) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, valuation and media sentiment.

Blue Gold has lower revenue, but higher earnings than FAT Brands.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
FAT Brands	$574.14M	0.01	-$189.85M	-$13.35	N/A
Blue Gold	N/A	N/A	-$21.91M	N/A	N/A

FAT Brands has a beta of 1.34, indicating that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Blue Gold has a beta of 3.44, indicating that its stock price is 244% more volatile than the broader market.

Blue Gold has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
FAT Brands	-39.33%	N/A	-17.99%
Blue Gold	N/A	N/A	N/A

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
FAT Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.67
Blue Gold	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

In the previous week, Blue Gold had 1 more articles in the media than FAT Brands. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Blue Gold and 0 mentions for FAT Brands. FAT Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Blue Gold'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
FAT Brands	Neutral
Blue Gold	Neutral

6.9% of FAT Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.6% of Blue Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.7% of FAT Brands shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 19.9% of Blue Gold shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Blue Gold beats FAT Brands on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FAT Brands compare to China Natural Resources?

FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FAT) and China Natural Resources (NASDAQ:CHNR) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and earnings.

China Natural Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
FAT Brands	-39.33%	N/A	-17.99%
China Natural Resources	N/A	N/A	N/A

FAT Brands has a beta of 1.34, meaning that its share price is 34% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, China Natural Resources has a beta of 0.12, meaning that its share price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, FAT Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled China Natural Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
FAT Brands	Neutral
China Natural Resources	Neutral

6.9% of FAT Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of China Natural Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 15.7% of FAT Brands shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.2% of China Natural Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

China Natural Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than FAT Brands.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
FAT Brands	$574.14M	0.01	-$189.85M	-$13.35	N/A
China Natural Resources	N/A	N/A	-$180K	N/A	N/A

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
FAT Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.67
China Natural Resources	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Summary

FAT Brands and China Natural Resources tied by winning 4 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FAT Brands compare to Golden Minerals?

Golden Minerals (NYSE:AUMN) and FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FAT) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, dividends, earnings and media sentiment.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Golden Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
FAT Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.67

Golden Minerals has a beta of -0.75, indicating that its share price is 175% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FAT Brands has a beta of 1.34, indicating that its share price is 34% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Golden Minerals had 2 more articles in the media than FAT Brands. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Golden Minerals and 0 mentions for FAT Brands. Golden Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.18 beat FAT Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Golden Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Golden Minerals	Neutral
FAT Brands	Neutral

Golden Minerals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%. FAT Brands' return on equity of 0.00% beat Golden Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Golden Minerals	N/A	-1,051.75%	-57.22%
FAT Brands	-39.33%	N/A	-17.99%

13.4% of Golden Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.9% of FAT Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.8% of Golden Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.7% of FAT Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Golden Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than FAT Brands. Golden Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FAT Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Golden Minerals	$300K	11.81	-$9.23M	-$0.12	N/A
FAT Brands	$574.14M	0.01	-$189.85M	-$13.35	N/A

Summary

Golden Minerals and FAT Brands tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get FAT Brands News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FAT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

FAT vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	FAT Brands	Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$2.92M	$4.08B	$5.07B	$12.90B
Dividend Yield	N/A	5.16%	4.67%	9.14%
P/E Ratio	-0.01	25.85	26.19	25.42
Price / Sales	0.01	8,183.75	4,869.27	93.88
Price / Cash	N/A	26.67	24.69	35.62
Price / Book	-0.01	12.91	10.70	6.44
Net Income	-$189.85M	$127.55M	$158.16M	$358.18M
7 Day Performance	N/A	2.31%	1.80%	1.10%
1 Month Performance	N/A	13.39%	10.01%	-0.41%
1 Year Performance	-91.28%	53.87%	42.32%	13.98%

FAT Brands Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
FAT FAT Brands	N/A	$0.16 flat	N/A	N/A	$2.92M	$574.14M	N/A	7,131
HUDI Huadi International Group	0.274 of 5 stars	$0.76 -1.3%	N/A	-35.4%	$10.80M	$62.49M	N/A	390	Gap Down
ZKIN ZK International Group	0.6867 of 5 stars	$1.24 -3.9%	N/A	-37.4%	$8.20M	$71.24M	N/A	270	Gap Up High Trading Volume
BGL Blue Gold	0.934 of 5 stars	$0.19 -8.2%	N/A	-97.7%	$6.52M	N/A	N/A	N/A	Gap Up
CHNR China Natural Resources	0.757 of 5 stars	$3.94 -2.8%	N/A	+0.9%	$4.96M	N/A	N/A	80

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:FAT) was last updated on 9/8/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

FAT Brands (FAT) Competitors

FAT vs. HUDI, ZKIN, BGL, CHNR, and AUMN

How does FAT Brands compare to Huadi International Group?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to ZK International Group?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Blue Gold?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to China Natural Resources?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Golden Minerals?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FAT vs. The Competition

FAT Brands Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

FAT Brands (FAT) Competitors

FAT vs. HUDI, ZKIN, BGL, CHNR, and AUMN

How does FAT Brands compare to Huadi International Group?

Is FAT or HUDI more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, FAT or HUDI?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in FAT or HUDI?

Does the media prefer FAT or HUDI?

Which has better valuation & earnings, FAT or HUDI?

Do analysts prefer FAT or HUDI?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to ZK International Group?

Does the media prefer FAT or ZKIN?

Which has better valuation & earnings, FAT or ZKIN?

Do analysts prefer FAT or ZKIN?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in FAT or ZKIN?

Which has more risk and volatility, FAT or ZKIN?

Is FAT or ZKIN more profitable?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Blue Gold?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, FAT or BGL?

Which has more volatility and risk, FAT or BGL?

Is FAT or BGL more profitable?

Do analysts prefer FAT or BGL?

Does the media refer more to FAT or BGL?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in FAT or BGL?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to China Natural Resources?

Is FAT or CHNR more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, FAT or CHNR?

Does the media refer more to FAT or CHNR?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in FAT or CHNR?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, FAT or CHNR?

Do analysts rate FAT or CHNR?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Golden Minerals?

Do analysts recommend AUMN or FAT?

Which has more volatility & risk, AUMN or FAT?

Does the media favor AUMN or FAT?

Is AUMN or FAT more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in AUMN or FAT?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, AUMN or FAT?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FAT vs. The Competition

FAT Brands Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools