FAT Brands Competitors

FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FAT) and Fiesta Restaurant Group (NASDAQ:FRGI) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, risk and profitability.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for FAT Brands and Fiesta Restaurant Group, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

FAT Brands currently has a consensus price target of $8.00, indicating a potential downside of 6.32%. Fiesta Restaurant Group has a consensus price target of $14.00, indicating a potential downside of 8.26%. Given FAT Brands' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe FAT Brands is more favorable than Fiesta Restaurant Group.

Volatility & Risk

FAT Brands has a beta of 2.08, indicating that its stock price is 108% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Fiesta Restaurant Group has a beta of 2.16, indicating that its stock price is 116% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

1.6% of FAT Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 4.3% of FAT Brands shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Fiesta Restaurant Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares FAT Brands and Fiesta Restaurant Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares FAT Brands and Fiesta Restaurant Group's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

FAT Brands has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Fiesta Restaurant Group. FAT Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fiesta Restaurant Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Fiesta Restaurant Group beats FAT Brands on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FAT) and Del Taco Restaurants (NASDAQ:TACO) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, risk and profitability.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for FAT Brands and Del Taco Restaurants, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

FAT Brands currently has a consensus price target of $8.00, indicating a potential downside of 6.32%. Del Taco Restaurants has a consensus price target of $11.00, indicating a potential upside of 9.56%. Given Del Taco Restaurants' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Del Taco Restaurants is more favorable than FAT Brands.

Volatility & Risk

FAT Brands has a beta of 2.08, indicating that its stock price is 108% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Del Taco Restaurants has a beta of 1.99, indicating that its stock price is 99% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

1.6% of FAT Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.8% of Del Taco Restaurants shares are held by institutional investors. 4.3% of FAT Brands shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 16.5% of Del Taco Restaurants shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares FAT Brands and Del Taco Restaurants' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares FAT Brands and Del Taco Restaurants' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

FAT Brands has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Del Taco Restaurants. FAT Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Del Taco Restaurants, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Del Taco Restaurants beats FAT Brands on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FAT) and Carrols Restaurant Group (NASDAQ:TAST) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, risk and profitability.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for FAT Brands and Carrols Restaurant Group, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

FAT Brands currently has a consensus price target of $8.00, indicating a potential downside of 6.32%. Carrols Restaurant Group has a consensus price target of $7.5833, indicating a potential upside of 22.71%. Given Carrols Restaurant Group's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Carrols Restaurant Group is more favorable than FAT Brands.

Volatility & Risk

FAT Brands has a beta of 2.08, indicating that its stock price is 108% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Carrols Restaurant Group has a beta of 2.61, indicating that its stock price is 161% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

1.6% of FAT Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 49.7% of Carrols Restaurant Group shares are held by institutional investors. 4.3% of FAT Brands shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 22.0% of Carrols Restaurant Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares FAT Brands and Carrols Restaurant Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares FAT Brands and Carrols Restaurant Group's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

FAT Brands has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Carrols Restaurant Group. FAT Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Carrols Restaurant Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Carrols Restaurant Group beats FAT Brands on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FAT) and LiveXLive Media (NASDAQ:LIVX) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, risk and profitability.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for FAT Brands and LiveXLive Media, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

FAT Brands currently has a consensus price target of $8.00, indicating a potential downside of 6.32%. LiveXLive Media has a consensus price target of $6.2917, indicating a potential upside of 58.48%. Given LiveXLive Media's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe LiveXLive Media is more favorable than FAT Brands.

Volatility & Risk

FAT Brands has a beta of 2.08, indicating that its stock price is 108% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, LiveXLive Media has a beta of 1.35, indicating that its stock price is 35% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

1.6% of FAT Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.1% of LiveXLive Media shares are held by institutional investors. 4.3% of FAT Brands shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 29.6% of LiveXLive Media shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares FAT Brands and LiveXLive Media's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares FAT Brands and LiveXLive Media's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

FAT Brands has higher earnings, but lower revenue than LiveXLive Media. FAT Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than LiveXLive Media, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

LiveXLive Media beats FAT Brands on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FAT) and Biglari (NYSE:BH) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, risk and profitability.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for FAT Brands and Biglari, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

FAT Brands currently has a consensus price target of $8.00, indicating a potential downside of 6.32%. Given FAT Brands' higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe FAT Brands is more favorable than Biglari.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

1.6% of FAT Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 4.3% of FAT Brands shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 58.8% of Biglari shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares FAT Brands and Biglari's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares FAT Brands and Biglari's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Biglari has higher revenue and earnings than FAT Brands.

Summary

Biglari beats FAT Brands on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FAT) and Kura Sushi USA (NASDAQ:KRUS) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, risk and profitability.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for FAT Brands and Kura Sushi USA, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

FAT Brands currently has a consensus price target of $8.00, indicating a potential downside of 6.32%. Kura Sushi USA has a consensus price target of $22.40, indicating a potential downside of 25.06%. Given FAT Brands' higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe FAT Brands is more favorable than Kura Sushi USA.

Volatility & Risk

FAT Brands has a beta of 2.08, indicating that its stock price is 108% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Kura Sushi USA has a beta of 2.3, indicating that its stock price is 130% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

1.6% of FAT Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.3% of Kura Sushi USA shares are held by institutional investors. 4.3% of FAT Brands shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Kura Sushi USA shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares FAT Brands and Kura Sushi USA's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares FAT Brands and Kura Sushi USA's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

FAT Brands has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Kura Sushi USA. FAT Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kura Sushi USA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Kura Sushi USA beats FAT Brands on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.