FAT vs. RRGB, STKS, NDLS, THCH, ARKR, GTIM, LOCO, NATH, GENK, and PBPB
Should you be buying FAT Brands stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of FAT Brands include Red Robin Gourmet Burgers (RRGB), ONE Group Hospitality (STKS), Noodles & Company (NDLS), TH International (THCH), Ark Restaurants (ARKR), Good Times Restaurants (GTIM), El Pollo Loco (LOCO), Nathan's Famous (NATH), GEN Restaurant Group (GENK), and Potbelly (PBPB). These companies are all part of the "eating places" industry.
FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FAT) and Red Robin Gourmet Burgers (NASDAQ:RRGB) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and community ranking.
FAT Brands has a beta of 1.81, meaning that its share price is 81% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has a beta of 2.83, meaning that its share price is 183% more volatile than the S&P 500.
In the previous week, Red Robin Gourmet Burgers had 1 more articles in the media than FAT Brands. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers and 4 mentions for FAT Brands. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers' average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat FAT Brands' score of 0.46 indicating that Red Robin Gourmet Burgers is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has a net margin of -1.61% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -18.75%. FAT Brands' return on equity of 0.00% beat Red Robin Gourmet Burgers' return on equity.
6.9% of FAT Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.0% of Red Robin Gourmet Burgers shares are held by institutional investors. 11.8% of FAT Brands shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.2% of Red Robin Gourmet Burgers shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.
FAT Brands currently has a consensus target price of $15.00, suggesting a potential upside of 100.00%. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has a consensus target price of $15.67, suggesting a potential upside of 124.77%. Given Red Robin Gourmet Burgers' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Red Robin Gourmet Burgers is more favorable than FAT Brands.
Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has higher revenue and earnings than FAT Brands. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FAT Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Red Robin Gourmet Burgers received 450 more outperform votes than FAT Brands when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 67.99% of users gave Red Robin Gourmet Burgers an outperform vote while only 61.31% of users gave FAT Brands an outperform vote.
Summary
Red Robin Gourmet Burgers beats FAT Brands on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get FAT Brands News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FAT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FAT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
FAT Brands Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
