Do analysts rate AUST or FAT?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Austin Gold 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 FAT Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50

Is AUST or FAT more profitable?

Austin Gold has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%. FAT Brands' return on equity of 0.00% beat Austin Gold's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Austin Gold N/A -37.85% -36.54% FAT Brands -39.33% N/A -17.99%

Do analysts rate ZKIN or FAT?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score ZK International Group 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 FAT Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50

Which has higher earnings & valuation, ZKIN or FAT?

ZK International Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than FAT Brands. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio ZK International Group $71.24M 0.14 -$3.98M N/A N/A FAT Brands $574.14M 0.01 -$189.85M -$13.35 N/A

Is ZKIN or FAT more profitable?

ZK International Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets ZK International Group N/A N/A N/A FAT Brands -39.33% N/A -17.99%

Do analysts recommend HUDI or FAT?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Huadi International Group 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 FAT Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, HUDI or FAT?

Huadi International Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than FAT Brands. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Huadi International Group $62.49M 0.12 -$1.40M N/A N/A FAT Brands $574.14M 0.01 -$189.85M -$13.35 N/A

Is HUDI or FAT more profitable?

Huadi International Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Huadi International Group N/A N/A N/A FAT Brands -39.33% N/A -17.99%

Do analysts prefer FAT or CHNR?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score FAT Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50 China Natural Resources 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has better earnings & valuation, FAT or CHNR?

China Natural Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than FAT Brands. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio FAT Brands $574.14M 0.01 -$189.85M -$13.35 N/A China Natural Resources N/A N/A -$180K N/A N/A

Is FAT or CHNR more profitable?

China Natural Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets FAT Brands -39.33% N/A -17.99% China Natural Resources N/A N/A N/A

Do analysts prefer FAT or AUMN?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score FAT Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50 Golden Minerals 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Is FAT or AUMN more profitable?

Golden Minerals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%. FAT Brands' return on equity of 0.00% beat Golden Minerals' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets FAT Brands -39.33% N/A -17.99% Golden Minerals N/A -1,051.75% -57.22%

FAT Brands (FAT) Competitors

$0.16 0.00 (0.00%)

As of 11/6/2026

Compare

FAT vs. AUST, ZKIN, HUDI, CHNR, and AUMN

Should you buy FAT Brands stock or one of its competitors? FAT Brands's main competitors and comparable companies include Austin Gold (AUST), ZK International Group (ZKIN), Huadi International Group (HUDI), China Natural Resources (CHNR), and Golden Minerals (AUMN). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "metals & mining" industry.

How does FAT Brands compare to Austin Gold?

Austin Gold (NYSE:AUST) and FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FAT) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and profitability.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Austin Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
FAT Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50

Austin Gold has a beta of 1.04, suggesting that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FAT Brands has a beta of 1.34, suggesting that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the broader market.

Austin Gold has higher earnings, but lower revenue than FAT Brands. Austin Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FAT Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Austin Gold	N/A	N/A	-$4M	-$0.18	N/A
FAT Brands	$574.14M	0.01	-$189.85M	-$13.35	N/A

Austin Gold has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%. FAT Brands' return on equity of 0.00% beat Austin Gold's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Austin Gold	N/A	-37.85%	-36.54%
FAT Brands	-39.33%	N/A	-17.99%

In the previous week, Austin Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled FAT Brands'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Austin Gold	Neutral
FAT Brands	Neutral

62.1% of Austin Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.9% of FAT Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 70.7% of Austin Gold shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.7% of FAT Brands shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

FAT Brands beats Austin Gold on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FAT Brands compare to ZK International Group?

ZK International Group (NASDAQ:ZKIN) and FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FAT) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, risk, earnings, dividends and media sentiment.

ZK International Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than FAT Brands.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
ZK International Group	$71.24M	0.14	-$3.98M	N/A	N/A
FAT Brands	$574.14M	0.01	-$189.85M	-$13.35	N/A

In the previous week, ZK International Group had 1 more articles in the media than FAT Brands. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for ZK International Group and 0 mentions for FAT Brands. ZK International Group's average media sentiment score of 1.79 beat FAT Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that ZK International Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
ZK International Group	Very Positive
FAT Brands	Neutral

0.3% of ZK International Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.9% of FAT Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 29.8% of ZK International Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.7% of FAT Brands shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

ZK International Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
ZK International Group	N/A	N/A	N/A
FAT Brands	-39.33%	N/A	-17.99%

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
ZK International Group	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
FAT Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50

ZK International Group has a beta of 2.22, indicating that its stock price is 122% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FAT Brands has a beta of 1.34, indicating that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

ZK International Group beats FAT Brands on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FAT Brands compare to Huadi International Group?

Huadi International Group (NASDAQ:HUDI) and FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FAT) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, dividends, earnings, risk and media sentiment.

Huadi International Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Huadi International Group	N/A	N/A	N/A
FAT Brands	-39.33%	N/A	-17.99%

Huadi International Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than FAT Brands.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Huadi International Group	$62.49M	0.12	-$1.40M	N/A	N/A
FAT Brands	$574.14M	0.01	-$189.85M	-$13.35	N/A

0.2% of Huadi International Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.9% of FAT Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 75.6% of Huadi International Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.7% of FAT Brands shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Huadi International Group has a beta of 0.76, suggesting that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FAT Brands has a beta of 1.34, suggesting that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the broader market.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Huadi International Group	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
FAT Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50

In the previous week, Huadi International Group had 2 more articles in the media than FAT Brands. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Huadi International Group and 0 mentions for FAT Brands. Huadi International Group's average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat FAT Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Huadi International Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Huadi International Group	Positive
FAT Brands	Neutral

Summary

Huadi International Group beats FAT Brands on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FAT Brands compare to China Natural Resources?

FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FAT) and China Natural Resources (NASDAQ:CHNR) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability and earnings.

6.9% of FAT Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of China Natural Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 15.7% of FAT Brands shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.2% of China Natural Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

China Natural Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
FAT Brands	-39.33%	N/A	-17.99%
China Natural Resources	N/A	N/A	N/A

FAT Brands has a beta of 1.34, indicating that its share price is 34% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, China Natural Resources has a beta of 0.08, indicating that its share price is 92% less volatile than the broader market.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
FAT Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50
China Natural Resources	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

China Natural Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than FAT Brands.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
FAT Brands	$574.14M	0.01	-$189.85M	-$13.35	N/A
China Natural Resources	N/A	N/A	-$180K	N/A	N/A

In the previous week, China Natural Resources had 1 more articles in the media than FAT Brands. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for China Natural Resources and 0 mentions for FAT Brands. China Natural Resources' average media sentiment score of 1.84 beat FAT Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that China Natural Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
FAT Brands	Neutral
China Natural Resources	Very Positive

Summary

China Natural Resources beats FAT Brands on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FAT Brands compare to Golden Minerals?

FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FAT) and Golden Minerals (NYSE:AUMN) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, risk, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

Golden Minerals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%. FAT Brands' return on equity of 0.00% beat Golden Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
FAT Brands	-39.33%	N/A	-17.99%
Golden Minerals	N/A	-1,051.75%	-57.22%

6.9% of FAT Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.4% of Golden Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 15.7% of FAT Brands shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.8% of Golden Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

FAT Brands has a beta of 1.34, indicating that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Golden Minerals has a beta of -0.87, indicating that its stock price is 187% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Golden Minerals had 2 more articles in the media than FAT Brands. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Golden Minerals and 0 mentions for FAT Brands. FAT Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Golden Minerals'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
FAT Brands	Neutral
Golden Minerals	Neutral

Golden Minerals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than FAT Brands. Golden Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FAT Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
FAT Brands	$574.14M	0.01	-$189.85M	-$13.35	N/A
Golden Minerals	$300K	11.58	-$9.23M	-$0.12	N/A

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
FAT Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50
Golden Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Summary

FAT Brands beats Golden Minerals on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get FAT Brands News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FAT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

FAT vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	FAT Brands	Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$2.92M	$3.54B	$4.63B	$12.14B
Dividend Yield	N/A	5.00%	4.30%	4.51%
P/E Ratio	-0.01	27.96	28.05	30.54
Price / Sales	0.01	8.69	5.80	5.91
Price / Cash	N/A	22.88	20.89	22.80
Price / Book	-0.01	4.45	4.10	3.80
Net Income	-$189.85M	$127.64M	$159.56M	$390.69M
7 Day Performance	N/A	-1.45%	-1.09%	0.04%
1 Month Performance	N/A	-7.89%	-6.01%	-6.37%
1 Year Performance	-87.96%	8.43%	7.96%	-5.63%

FAT Brands Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
FAT FAT Brands	N/A	$0.16 flat	N/A	N/A	$2.92M	$574.14M	N/A	7,131
AUST Austin Gold	N/A	$0.79 -8.0%	N/A	-57.4%	$10.79M	N/A	N/A	3	Gap Up
ZKIN ZK International Group	0.9494 of 5 stars	$1.54 +1.1%	N/A	-46.0%	$10.15M	$71.24M	N/A	274	Positive News Gap Down
HUDI Huadi International Group	0.7061 of 5 stars	$0.49 -0.9%	N/A	-57.4%	$7.07M	$62.49M	N/A	362	Gap Down
CHNR China Natural Resources	1.28 of 5 stars	$3.93 -1.8%	N/A	-2.8%	$4.95M	N/A	N/A	9

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:FAT) was last updated on 11/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

FAT Brands (FAT) Competitors

FAT vs. AUST, ZKIN, HUDI, CHNR, and AUMN

How does FAT Brands compare to Austin Gold?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to ZK International Group?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Huadi International Group?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to China Natural Resources?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Golden Minerals?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FAT vs. The Competition

FAT Brands Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

FAT Brands (FAT) Competitors

FAT vs. AUST, ZKIN, HUDI, CHNR, and AUMN

How does FAT Brands compare to Austin Gold?

Do analysts rate AUST or FAT?

Which has more volatility and risk, AUST or FAT?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, AUST or FAT?

Is AUST or FAT more profitable?

Does the media refer more to AUST or FAT?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in AUST or FAT?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to ZK International Group?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, ZKIN or FAT?

Does the media refer more to ZKIN or FAT?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in ZKIN or FAT?

Is ZKIN or FAT more profitable?

Do analysts rate ZKIN or FAT?

Which has more volatility and risk, ZKIN or FAT?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Huadi International Group?

Is HUDI or FAT more profitable?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, HUDI or FAT?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in HUDI or FAT?

Which has more risk and volatility, HUDI or FAT?

Do analysts recommend HUDI or FAT?

Does the media favor HUDI or FAT?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to China Natural Resources?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in FAT or CHNR?

Is FAT or CHNR more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, FAT or CHNR?

Do analysts prefer FAT or CHNR?

Which has better earnings & valuation, FAT or CHNR?

Does the media prefer FAT or CHNR?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Golden Minerals?

Is FAT or AUMN more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of FAT or AUMN?

Which has more risk and volatility, FAT or AUMN?

Does the media refer more to FAT or AUMN?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, FAT or AUMN?

Do analysts prefer FAT or AUMN?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FAT vs. The Competition

FAT Brands Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools