Do analysts prefer HUDI or FAT?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Huadi International Group 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 FAT Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50

Which has higher earnings and valuation, HUDI or FAT?

Huadi International Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than FAT Brands. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Huadi International Group $62.49M 0.17 -$1.40M N/A N/A FAT Brands $574.14M 0.01 -$189.85M -$13.35 N/A

Is HUDI or FAT more profitable?

Huadi International Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Huadi International Group N/A N/A N/A FAT Brands -39.33% N/A -17.99%

Do analysts rate FAT or ZKIN?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score FAT Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50 ZK International Group 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has better valuation and earnings, FAT or ZKIN?

ZK International Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than FAT Brands. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio FAT Brands $574.14M 0.01 -$189.85M -$13.35 N/A ZK International Group $71.24M 0.20 -$3.98M N/A N/A

Is FAT or ZKIN more profitable?

ZK International Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets FAT Brands -39.33% N/A -17.99% ZK International Group N/A N/A N/A

Does the media favor FAT or ZKIN?

In the previous week, ZK International Group had 2 more articles in the media than FAT Brands. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for ZK International Group and 1 mentions for FAT Brands. ZK International Group's average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat FAT Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that ZK International Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment FAT Brands 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral ZK International Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate BGL or FAT?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Blue Gold 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 FAT Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, BGL or FAT?

Blue Gold has higher earnings, but lower revenue than FAT Brands. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Blue Gold N/A N/A -$21.91M N/A N/A FAT Brands $574.14M 0.01 -$189.85M -$13.35 N/A

Is BGL or FAT more profitable?

Blue Gold has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Blue Gold N/A N/A N/A FAT Brands -39.33% N/A -17.99%

Does the media refer more to BGL or FAT?

In the previous week, Blue Gold had 2 more articles in the media than FAT Brands. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Blue Gold and 1 mentions for FAT Brands. Blue Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.39 beat FAT Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Blue Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Blue Gold 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral FAT Brands 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts prefer FAT or CHNR?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score FAT Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50 China Natural Resources 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, FAT or CHNR?

China Natural Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than FAT Brands. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio FAT Brands $574.14M 0.01 -$189.85M -$13.35 N/A China Natural Resources N/A N/A -$180K N/A N/A

Is FAT or CHNR more profitable?

China Natural Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets FAT Brands -39.33% N/A -17.99% China Natural Resources N/A N/A N/A

Does the media prefer FAT or CHNR?

In the previous week, China Natural Resources had 1 more articles in the media than FAT Brands. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for China Natural Resources and 1 mentions for FAT Brands. China Natural Resources' average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat FAT Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that China Natural Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment FAT Brands 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral China Natural Resources 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Do analysts prefer FAT or AUMN?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score FAT Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50 Golden Minerals 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Is FAT or AUMN more profitable?

Golden Minerals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%. FAT Brands' return on equity of 0.00% beat Golden Minerals' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets FAT Brands -39.33% N/A -17.99% Golden Minerals N/A -1,051.75% -57.22%

Does the media favor FAT or AUMN?

In the previous week, FAT Brands and FAT Brands both had 1 articles in the media. FAT Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Golden Minerals'average media sentiment score. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment FAT Brands 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Golden Minerals 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

FAT Brands (FAT) Competitors

$0.16 0.00 (0.00%)

As of 09/25/2026

Compare

FAT vs. HUDI, ZKIN, BGL, CHNR, and AUMN

Should you buy FAT Brands stock or one of its competitors? FAT Brands's main competitors and comparable companies include Huadi International Group (HUDI), ZK International Group (ZKIN), Blue Gold (BGL), China Natural Resources (CHNR), and Golden Minerals (AUMN). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "metals & mining" industry.

How does FAT Brands compare to Huadi International Group?

Huadi International Group (NASDAQ:HUDI) and FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FAT) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

Huadi International Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Huadi International Group	N/A	N/A	N/A
FAT Brands	-39.33%	N/A	-17.99%

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Huadi International Group	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
FAT Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50

0.2% of Huadi International Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.9% of FAT Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 15.7% of FAT Brands shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Huadi International Group has a beta of 1.98, meaning that its stock price is 98% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FAT Brands has a beta of 1.34, meaning that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the broader market.

Huadi International Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than FAT Brands.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Huadi International Group	$62.49M	0.17	-$1.40M	N/A	N/A
FAT Brands	$574.14M	0.01	-$189.85M	-$13.35	N/A

In the previous week, Huadi International Group and Huadi International Group both had 1 articles in the media. Huadi International Group's average media sentiment score of 1.82 beat FAT Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Huadi International Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Huadi International Group	Very Positive
FAT Brands	Neutral

Summary

Huadi International Group beats FAT Brands on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FAT Brands compare to ZK International Group?

FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FAT) and ZK International Group (NASDAQ:ZKIN) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, earnings, dividends and media sentiment.

ZK International Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than FAT Brands.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
FAT Brands	$574.14M	0.01	-$189.85M	-$13.35	N/A
ZK International Group	$71.24M	0.20	-$3.98M	N/A	N/A

In the previous week, ZK International Group had 2 more articles in the media than FAT Brands. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for ZK International Group and 1 mentions for FAT Brands. ZK International Group's average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat FAT Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that ZK International Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
FAT Brands	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
ZK International Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

FAT Brands has a beta of 1.34, indicating that its share price is 34% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ZK International Group has a beta of 2.23, indicating that its share price is 123% more volatile than the broader market.

ZK International Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
FAT Brands	-39.33%	N/A	-17.99%
ZK International Group	N/A	N/A	N/A

6.9% of FAT Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of ZK International Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.7% of FAT Brands shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 29.8% of ZK International Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
FAT Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50
ZK International Group	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Summary

ZK International Group beats FAT Brands on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FAT Brands compare to Blue Gold?

Blue Gold (NASDAQ:BGL) and FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FAT) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, risk, valuation, dividends and earnings.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Blue Gold	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
FAT Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50

24.6% of Blue Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.9% of FAT Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 19.9% of Blue Gold shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.7% of FAT Brands shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Blue Gold has higher earnings, but lower revenue than FAT Brands.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Blue Gold	N/A	N/A	-$21.91M	N/A	N/A
FAT Brands	$574.14M	0.01	-$189.85M	-$13.35	N/A

In the previous week, Blue Gold had 2 more articles in the media than FAT Brands. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Blue Gold and 1 mentions for FAT Brands. Blue Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.39 beat FAT Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Blue Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Blue Gold	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
FAT Brands	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Blue Gold has a beta of 3.44, suggesting that its stock price is 244% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FAT Brands has a beta of 1.34, suggesting that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the broader market.

Blue Gold has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Blue Gold	N/A	N/A	N/A
FAT Brands	-39.33%	N/A	-17.99%

Summary

Blue Gold beats FAT Brands on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FAT Brands compare to China Natural Resources?

FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FAT) and China Natural Resources (NASDAQ:CHNR) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations and dividends.

China Natural Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
FAT Brands	-39.33%	N/A	-17.99%
China Natural Resources	N/A	N/A	N/A

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
FAT Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50
China Natural Resources	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

In the previous week, China Natural Resources had 1 more articles in the media than FAT Brands. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for China Natural Resources and 1 mentions for FAT Brands. China Natural Resources' average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat FAT Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that China Natural Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
FAT Brands	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
China Natural Resources	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

China Natural Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than FAT Brands.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
FAT Brands	$574.14M	0.01	-$189.85M	-$13.35	N/A
China Natural Resources	N/A	N/A	-$180K	N/A	N/A

6.9% of FAT Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of China Natural Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 15.7% of FAT Brands shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.2% of China Natural Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

FAT Brands has a beta of 1.34, indicating that its share price is 34% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, China Natural Resources has a beta of 0.12, indicating that its share price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

China Natural Resources beats FAT Brands on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FAT Brands compare to Golden Minerals?

FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FAT) and Golden Minerals (NYSE:AUMN) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations and risk.

In the previous week, FAT Brands and FAT Brands both had 1 articles in the media. FAT Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Golden Minerals'average media sentiment score.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
FAT Brands	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Golden Minerals	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

FAT Brands has a beta of 1.34, meaning that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Golden Minerals has a beta of -0.75, meaning that its stock price is 175% less volatile than the broader market.

6.9% of FAT Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.4% of Golden Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.7% of FAT Brands shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.8% of Golden Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Golden Minerals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than FAT Brands. Golden Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FAT Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
FAT Brands	$574.14M	0.01	-$189.85M	-$13.35	N/A
Golden Minerals	$300K	11.66	-$9.23M	-$0.12	N/A

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
FAT Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50
Golden Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Golden Minerals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -39.33%. FAT Brands' return on equity of 0.00% beat Golden Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
FAT Brands	-39.33%	N/A	-17.99%
Golden Minerals	N/A	-1,051.75%	-57.22%

Summary

FAT Brands beats Golden Minerals on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get FAT Brands News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FAT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

FAT vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	FAT Brands	Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$2.92M	$3.81B	$4.80B	$13.18B
Dividend Yield	N/A	5.23%	4.73%	14.03%
P/E Ratio	-0.01	25.12	25.48	25.59
Price / Sales	0.01	27,834.71	16,536.70	83.42
Price / Cash	N/A	26.49	24.50	35.00
Price / Book	-0.01	12.11	10.06	6.44
Net Income	-$189.85M	$127.13M	$157.81M	$360.47M
7 Day Performance	N/A	-3.27%	-2.91%	-1.44%
1 Month Performance	N/A	-4.12%	-3.94%	-3.72%
1 Year Performance	-91.53%	24.74%	21.22%	3.91%

FAT Brands Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
FAT FAT Brands	0.1811 of 5 stars	$0.16 flat	N/A	N/A	$2.92M	$574.14M	N/A	7,131
HUDI Huadi International Group	0.2508 of 5 stars	$0.76 -2.4%	N/A	-47.5%	$10.87M	$62.49M	N/A	362	Positive News
ZKIN ZK International Group	1.3342 of 5 stars	$1.45 +35.5%	N/A	-18.1%	$9.58M	$71.24M	N/A	274	News Coverage Positive News Short Interest Decrease Gap Down High Trading Volume
BGL Blue Gold	0.652 of 5 stars	$0.23 -6.1%	N/A	-98.0%	$7.86M	N/A	N/A	10
CHNR China Natural Resources	1.356 of 5 stars	$3.95 +5.8%	N/A	-20.0%	$4.97M	N/A	N/A	9	Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:FAT) was last updated on 9/29/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

FAT Brands (FAT) Competitors

FAT vs. HUDI, ZKIN, BGL, CHNR, and AUMN

How does FAT Brands compare to Huadi International Group?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to ZK International Group?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Blue Gold?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to China Natural Resources?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Golden Minerals?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FAT vs. The Competition

FAT Brands Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

FAT Brands (FAT) Competitors

FAT vs. HUDI, ZKIN, BGL, CHNR, and AUMN

How does FAT Brands compare to Huadi International Group?

Is HUDI or FAT more profitable?

Do analysts prefer HUDI or FAT?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in HUDI or FAT?

Which has more volatility and risk, HUDI or FAT?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, HUDI or FAT?

Does the media prefer HUDI or FAT?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to ZK International Group?

Which has better valuation and earnings, FAT or ZKIN?

Does the media favor FAT or ZKIN?

Which has more risk and volatility, FAT or ZKIN?

Is FAT or ZKIN more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of FAT or ZKIN?

Do analysts rate FAT or ZKIN?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Blue Gold?

Do analysts rate BGL or FAT?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of BGL or FAT?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, BGL or FAT?

Does the media refer more to BGL or FAT?

Which has more volatility & risk, BGL or FAT?

Is BGL or FAT more profitable?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to China Natural Resources?

Is FAT or CHNR more profitable?

Do analysts prefer FAT or CHNR?

Does the media prefer FAT or CHNR?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, FAT or CHNR?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in FAT or CHNR?

Which has more risk & volatility, FAT or CHNR?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Golden Minerals?

Does the media favor FAT or AUMN?

Which has more volatility and risk, FAT or AUMN?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in FAT or AUMN?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, FAT or AUMN?

Do analysts prefer FAT or AUMN?

Is FAT or AUMN more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FAT vs. The Competition

FAT Brands Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools