NASDAQ:FLL

Full House Resorts Competitors

$8.71
-0.68 (-7.24 %)
(As of 04/13/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$8.42
Now: $8.71
$9.36
50-Day Range
$6.68
MA: $8.05
$9.50
52-Week Range
$1.00
Now: $8.71
$10.07
Volume479,174 shs
Average Volume588,230 shs
Market Capitalization$296.51 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta2.07

Competitors

Full House Resorts (NASDAQ:FLL) Vs. MAR, LVS, HLT, MGM, CZR, and HTHT

Should you be buying FLL stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "hotels & motels" are considered alternatives and competitors to Full House Resorts, including Marriott International (MAR), Las Vegas Sands (LVS), Hilton Worldwide (HLT), MGM Resorts International (MGM), Caesars Entertainment (CZR), and Huazhu Group (HTHT).

Marriott International (NASDAQ:MAR) and Full House Resorts (NASDAQ:FLL) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, profitability and dividends.

Volatility & Risk

Marriott International has a beta of 1.83, indicating that its stock price is 83% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Full House Resorts has a beta of 2.07, indicating that its stock price is 107% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

57.7% of Marriott International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.6% of Full House Resorts shares are held by institutional investors. 12.8% of Marriott International shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.7% of Full House Resorts shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Marriott International and Full House Resorts, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Marriott International091002.53
Full House Resorts00303.00

Marriott International currently has a consensus target price of $123.4444, indicating a potential downside of 17.05%. Full House Resorts has a consensus target price of $10.75, indicating a potential upside of 23.42%. Given Full House Resorts' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Full House Resorts is more favorable than Marriott International.

Profitability

This table compares Marriott International and Full House Resorts' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Marriott International1.28%188.71%1.55%
Full House Resorts-5.93%-11.98%-2.99%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Marriott International and Full House Resorts' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Marriott International$20.97 billion2.30$1.27 billion$6.0024.80
Full House Resorts$165.43 million1.79$-5,820,000.00($0.22)-39.59

Marriott International has higher revenue and earnings than Full House Resorts. Full House Resorts is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marriott International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Marriott International beats Full House Resorts on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Las Vegas Sands (NYSE:LVS) and Full House Resorts (NASDAQ:FLL) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, risk, earnings and dividends.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

37.3% of Las Vegas Sands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.6% of Full House Resorts shares are held by institutional investors. 10.8% of Las Vegas Sands shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.7% of Full House Resorts shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility and Risk

Las Vegas Sands has a beta of 1.35, indicating that its share price is 35% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Full House Resorts has a beta of 2.07, indicating that its share price is 107% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Las Vegas Sands and Full House Resorts' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Las Vegas Sands-12.67%-12.97%-3.03%
Full House Resorts-5.93%-11.98%-2.99%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Las Vegas Sands and Full House Resorts' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Las Vegas Sands$13.74 billion3.39$2.70 billion$3.2618.71
Full House Resorts$165.43 million1.79$-5,820,000.00($0.22)-39.59

Las Vegas Sands has higher revenue and earnings than Full House Resorts. Full House Resorts is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Las Vegas Sands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Las Vegas Sands and Full House Resorts, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Las Vegas Sands071102.61
Full House Resorts00303.00

Las Vegas Sands currently has a consensus price target of $58.0938, suggesting a potential downside of 4.76%. Full House Resorts has a consensus price target of $10.75, suggesting a potential upside of 23.42%. Given Full House Resorts' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Full House Resorts is more favorable than Las Vegas Sands.

Summary

Full House Resorts beats Las Vegas Sands on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Hilton Worldwide (NYSE:HLT) and Full House Resorts (NASDAQ:FLL) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, risk and earnings.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Hilton Worldwide and Full House Resorts' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hilton Worldwide$9.45 billion3.70$881 million$3.9032.34
Full House Resorts$165.43 million1.79$-5,820,000.00($0.22)-39.59

Hilton Worldwide has higher revenue and earnings than Full House Resorts. Full House Resorts is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hilton Worldwide, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Hilton Worldwide and Full House Resorts, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Hilton Worldwide091002.53
Full House Resorts00303.00

Hilton Worldwide currently has a consensus target price of $108.6667, indicating a potential downside of 13.83%. Full House Resorts has a consensus target price of $10.75, indicating a potential upside of 23.42%. Given Full House Resorts' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Full House Resorts is more favorable than Hilton Worldwide.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

97.6% of Hilton Worldwide shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.6% of Full House Resorts shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.8% of Hilton Worldwide shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 16.7% of Full House Resorts shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Hilton Worldwide and Full House Resorts' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Hilton Worldwide-5.46%-34.02%2.09%
Full House Resorts-5.93%-11.98%-2.99%

Risk & Volatility

Hilton Worldwide has a beta of 1.33, suggesting that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Full House Resorts has a beta of 2.07, suggesting that its stock price is 107% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Hilton Worldwide beats Full House Resorts on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

MGM Resorts International (NYSE:MGM) and Full House Resorts (NASDAQ:FLL) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares MGM Resorts International and Full House Resorts' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MGM Resorts International$12.90 billion1.57$2.05 billion$0.7753.23
Full House Resorts$165.43 million1.79$-5,820,000.00($0.22)-39.59

MGM Resorts International has higher revenue and earnings than Full House Resorts. Full House Resorts is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MGM Resorts International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

63.4% of MGM Resorts International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.6% of Full House Resorts shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.1% of MGM Resorts International shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 16.7% of Full House Resorts shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for MGM Resorts International and Full House Resorts, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
MGM Resorts International311502.11
Full House Resorts00303.00

MGM Resorts International currently has a consensus price target of $29.5625, indicating a potential downside of 27.88%. Full House Resorts has a consensus price target of $10.75, indicating a potential upside of 23.42%. Given Full House Resorts' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Full House Resorts is more favorable than MGM Resorts International.

Risk and Volatility

MGM Resorts International has a beta of 2.42, indicating that its share price is 142% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Full House Resorts has a beta of 2.07, indicating that its share price is 107% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares MGM Resorts International and Full House Resorts' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
MGM Resorts International20.81%-12.08%-4.10%
Full House Resorts-5.93%-11.98%-2.99%

Summary

MGM Resorts International beats Full House Resorts on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Caesars Entertainment (NASDAQ:CZR) and Full House Resorts (NASDAQ:FLL) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, dividends and institutional ownership.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

90.7% of Caesars Entertainment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.6% of Full House Resorts shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Caesars Entertainment shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.7% of Full House Resorts shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Caesars Entertainment and Full House Resorts, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Caesars Entertainment031202.80
Full House Resorts00303.00

Caesars Entertainment currently has a consensus price target of $80.4688, suggesting a potential downside of 15.94%. Full House Resorts has a consensus price target of $10.75, suggesting a potential upside of 23.42%. Given Full House Resorts' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Full House Resorts is more favorable than Caesars Entertainment.

Risk and Volatility

Caesars Entertainment has a beta of 3.15, suggesting that its share price is 215% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Full House Resorts has a beta of 2.07, suggesting that its share price is 107% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Caesars Entertainment and Full House Resorts' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Caesars Entertainment$2.53 billion7.89$81 million$1.4765.12
Full House Resorts$165.43 million1.79$-5,820,000.00($0.22)-39.59

Caesars Entertainment has higher revenue and earnings than Full House Resorts. Full House Resorts is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Caesars Entertainment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Caesars Entertainment and Full House Resorts' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Caesars Entertainment-47.29%-56.40%-7.39%
Full House Resorts-5.93%-11.98%-2.99%

Summary

Caesars Entertainment beats Full House Resorts on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Full House Resorts (NASDAQ:FLL) and Huazhu Group (NASDAQ:HTHT) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, earnings and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares Full House Resorts and Huazhu Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Full House Resorts-5.93%-11.98%-2.99%
Huazhu Group-22.08%-32.15%-3.71%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Full House Resorts and Huazhu Group, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Full House Resorts00303.00
Huazhu Group01302.75

Full House Resorts currently has a consensus price target of $10.75, suggesting a potential upside of 23.42%. Huazhu Group has a consensus price target of $57.8333, suggesting a potential upside of 4.60%. Given Full House Resorts' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Full House Resorts is more favorable than Huazhu Group.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

41.6% of Full House Resorts shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.7% of Full House Resorts shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 49.4% of Huazhu Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Full House Resorts and Huazhu Group's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Full House Resorts$165.43 million1.79$-5,820,000.00($0.22)-39.59
Huazhu Group$1.61 billion11.00$254 million$0.8565.05

Huazhu Group has higher revenue and earnings than Full House Resorts. Full House Resorts is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Huazhu Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Full House Resorts has a beta of 2.07, indicating that its stock price is 107% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Huazhu Group has a beta of 1.77, indicating that its stock price is 77% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Full House Resorts beats Huazhu Group on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.


Full House Resorts Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Marriott International logo
MAR
Marriott International
1.0$148.81-0.4%$48.28 billion$20.97 billion280.78
Las Vegas Sands logo
LVS
Las Vegas Sands
1.3$61.00-1.0%$46.60 billion$13.74 billion-61.62
Hilton Worldwide logo
HLT
Hilton Worldwide
1.8$126.11-0.7%$35.01 billion$9.45 billion-108.72Unusual Options Activity
MGM Resorts International logo
MGM
MGM Resorts International
1.8$40.99-0.4%$20.29 billion$12.90 billion14.64
Caesars Entertainment logo
CZR
Caesars Entertainment
1.4$95.73-1.5%$19.94 billion$2.53 billion-9.81
Huazhu Group logo
HTHT
Huazhu Group
1.1$55.29-1.9%$17.72 billion$1.61 billion-48.93Unusual Options Activity
News Coverage
Penn National Gaming logo
PENN
Penn National Gaming
1.7$102.56-0.7%$16.05 billion$5.30 billion-15.04
Wynn Resorts logo
WYNN
Wynn Resorts
1.4$129.82-0.1%$15.01 billion$6.61 billion-12.42Analyst Upgrade
InterContinental Hotels Group logo
IHG
InterContinental Hotels Group
1.0$70.40-0.6%$12.90 billion$2.08 billion23.39Decrease in Short Interest
Gap Up
Melco Resorts & Entertainment logo
MLCO
Melco Resorts & Entertainment
1.0$19.62-1.7%$9.36 billion$5.74 billion-9.39
Hyatt Hotels logo
H
Hyatt Hotels
1.1$83.64-1.0%$8.47 billion$5.02 billion-44.97
Boyd Gaming logo
BYD
Boyd Gaming
1.4$63.57-0.3%$7.12 billion$3.33 billion-109.60
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts logo
WH
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts
1.9$73.09-0.9%$6.82 billion$2.05 billion-152.27
Choice Hotels International logo
CHH
Choice Hotels International
1.0$109.94-0.5%$6.11 billion$1.11 billion56.09
Wyndham Destinations logo
WYND
Wyndham Destinations
1.7$64.01-0.6%$5.50 billion$4.04 billion-533.37
Park Hotels & Resorts logo
PK
Park Hotels & Resorts
1.3$21.32-0.2%$5.04 billion$2.84 billion-4.58
Red Rock Resorts logo
RRR
Red Rock Resorts
1.2$34.36-0.6%$4.03 billion$1.86 billion-13.32Decrease in Short Interest
Extended Stay America logo
STAY
Extended Stay America
1.3$19.73-0.1%$3.61 billionN/A0.00
Extended Stay America logo
STAY
Extended Stay America
1.4$19.73-0.1%$3.61 billion$1.22 billion-123.31Increase in Short Interest
Sunstone Hotel Investors logo
SHO
Sunstone Hotel Investors
1.1$12.51-1.4%$2.70 billion$1.12 billion-8.07Decrease in Short Interest
Xenia Hotels & Resorts logo
XHR
Xenia Hotels & Resorts
1.2$18.71-0.9%$2.13 billion$1.15 billion-19.29
Bally's logo
BALY
Bally's
1.4$54.30-12.0%$1.68 billion$523.58 million-126.28News Coverage
Gap Up
GreenTree Hospitality Group logo
GHG
GreenTree Hospitality Group
1.7$12.87-1.3%$1.32 billion$156.83 million36.77Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
Playa Hotels & Resorts logo
PLYA
Playa Hotels & Resorts
1.1$7.47-4.1%$1.23 billion$636.48 million-4.79Analyst Report
News Coverage
Gap Down
Monarch Casino & Resort logo
MCRI
Monarch Casino & Resort
1.3$66.20-0.2%$1.22 billion$249.17 million85.98Decrease in Short Interest
Studio City International logo
MSC
Studio City International
0.5$13.34-1.2%$1.05 billion$626.73 million-3.75Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Gap Up
Century Casinos logo
CNTY
Century Casinos
1.1$10.67-1.6%$315.58 million$218.23 million-4.22
Red Lion Hotels logo
RLH
Red Lion Hotels
1.0$3.49-0.0%$88.87 million$114.29 million-3.79News Coverage
This page was last updated on 4/14/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.