Go Pro
→ The $15 Gold Fund That Pays Up to $1,152/Month (From Investors Alley) (Ad)tc pixel Free FLL Stock Alerts

Full House Resorts (FLL) Competitors

Full House Resorts logo
$2.23 -0.07 (-3.04%)
Closing price 08/14/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$2.24 +0.00 (+0.22%)
As of 08/14/2026 07:34 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.
Compare

FLL vs. INSE, MRDN, CPHC, BRAG, and CNTY

Should you buy Full House Resorts stock or one of its competitors? Full House Resorts's main competitors and comparable companies include Inspired Entertainment (INSE), Meridian (MRDN), Canterbury Park (CPHC), Bragg Gaming Group (BRAG), and Century Casinos (CNTY). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "casinos & gaming" industry.

How does Full House Resorts compare to Inspired Entertainment?

Full House Resorts (NASDAQ:FLL) and Inspired Entertainment (NASDAQ:INSE) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation and media sentiment.

37.7% of Full House Resorts shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.4% of Inspired Entertainment shares are held by institutional investors. 10.6% of Full House Resorts shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.4% of Inspired Entertainment shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Full House Resorts presently has a consensus price target of $3.50, indicating a potential upside of 56.95%. Inspired Entertainment has a consensus price target of $20.00, indicating a potential upside of 221.54%. Given Inspired Entertainment's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Inspired Entertainment is more favorable than Full House Resorts.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Full House Resorts
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Inspired Entertainment
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Inspired Entertainment has higher revenue and earnings than Full House Resorts. Inspired Entertainment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Full House Resorts, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Full House Resorts$302.38M0.27-$40.20M-$1.02N/A
Inspired Entertainment$304.10M0.54-$17M-$0.33N/A

Inspired Entertainment has a net margin of -3.34% compared to Full House Resorts' net margin of -12.06%. Inspired Entertainment's return on equity of -30.08% beat Full House Resorts' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Full House Resorts-12.06% -473.31% -5.78%
Inspired Entertainment -3.34%-30.08%0.92%

Full House Resorts has a beta of 1.24, suggesting that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Inspired Entertainment has a beta of 1.22, suggesting that its share price is 22% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Full House Resorts had 2 more articles in the media than Inspired Entertainment. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Full House Resorts and 2 mentions for Inspired Entertainment. Inspired Entertainment's average media sentiment score of 1.85 beat Full House Resorts' score of 0.04 indicating that Inspired Entertainment is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Full House Resorts
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Inspired Entertainment
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Summary

Inspired Entertainment beats Full House Resorts on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Full House Resorts compare to Meridian?

Meridian (NASDAQ:MRDN) and Full House Resorts (NASDAQ:FLL) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership and risk.

Full House Resorts has a net margin of -12.06% compared to Meridian's net margin of -41.41%. Meridian's return on equity of -117.87% beat Full House Resorts' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Meridian-41.41% -117.87% -58.87%
Full House Resorts -12.06%-473.31%-5.78%

Meridian has a beta of 0.65, suggesting that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Full House Resorts has a beta of 1.24, suggesting that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

Full House Resorts has higher revenue and earnings than Meridian. Full House Resorts is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Meridian, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Meridian$182.86M0.99-$89.90M-$6.74N/A
Full House Resorts$302.38M0.27-$40.20M-$1.02N/A

In the previous week, Full House Resorts had 2 more articles in the media than Meridian. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Full House Resorts and 2 mentions for Meridian. Meridian's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Full House Resorts' score of 0.04 indicating that Meridian is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Meridian
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Full House Resorts
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

2.7% of Meridian shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.7% of Full House Resorts shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.4% of Meridian shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 10.6% of Full House Resorts shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Meridian currently has a consensus target price of $21.60, suggesting a potential upside of 51.15%. Full House Resorts has a consensus target price of $3.50, suggesting a potential upside of 56.95%. Given Full House Resorts' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Full House Resorts is more favorable than Meridian.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Meridian
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Full House Resorts
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Summary

Full House Resorts beats Meridian on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Full House Resorts compare to Canterbury Park?

Full House Resorts (NASDAQ:FLL) and Canterbury Park (NASDAQ:CPHC) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and dividends.

Full House Resorts has a beta of 1.24, indicating that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Canterbury Park has a beta of -0.39, indicating that its stock price is 139% less volatile than the broader market.

Canterbury Park has a net margin of 0.20% compared to Full House Resorts' net margin of -12.06%. Canterbury Park's return on equity of 0.14% beat Full House Resorts' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Full House Resorts-12.06% -473.31% -5.78%
Canterbury Park 0.20%0.14%0.10%

In the previous week, Full House Resorts and Full House Resorts both had 4 articles in the media. Full House Resorts' average media sentiment score of 0.04 beat Canterbury Park's score of -0.08 indicating that Full House Resorts is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Full House Resorts
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Canterbury Park
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

37.7% of Full House Resorts shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.4% of Canterbury Park shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.6% of Full House Resorts shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 23.7% of Canterbury Park shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Canterbury Park has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Full House Resorts. Full House Resorts is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Canterbury Park, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Full House Resorts$302.38M0.27-$40.20M-$1.02N/A
Canterbury Park$59.57M1.36-$530K$0.02780.75

Full House Resorts currently has a consensus price target of $3.50, suggesting a potential upside of 56.95%. Given Full House Resorts' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Full House Resorts is more favorable than Canterbury Park.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Full House Resorts
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Canterbury Park
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Summary

Canterbury Park beats Full House Resorts on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Full House Resorts compare to Bragg Gaming Group?

Full House Resorts (NASDAQ:FLL) and Bragg Gaming Group (NASDAQ:BRAG) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.

In the previous week, Full House Resorts had 1 more articles in the media than Bragg Gaming Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Full House Resorts and 3 mentions for Bragg Gaming Group. Full House Resorts' average media sentiment score of 0.04 beat Bragg Gaming Group's score of -0.56 indicating that Full House Resorts is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Full House Resorts
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Bragg Gaming Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative

Full House Resorts has a beta of 1.24, indicating that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bragg Gaming Group has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

Bragg Gaming Group has a net margin of -7.48% compared to Full House Resorts' net margin of -12.06%. Bragg Gaming Group's return on equity of -12.60% beat Full House Resorts' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Full House Resorts-12.06% -473.31% -5.78%
Bragg Gaming Group -7.48%-12.60%-8.14%

Bragg Gaming Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Full House Resorts. Bragg Gaming Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Full House Resorts, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Full House Resorts$302.38M0.27-$40.20M-$1.02N/A
Bragg Gaming Group$119.98M0.39-$9.18M-$0.31N/A

37.7% of Full House Resorts shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.0% of Bragg Gaming Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.6% of Full House Resorts shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 26.4% of Bragg Gaming Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Full House Resorts presently has a consensus target price of $3.50, suggesting a potential upside of 56.95%. Bragg Gaming Group has a consensus target price of $5.33, suggesting a potential upside of 248.58%. Given Bragg Gaming Group's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Bragg Gaming Group is more favorable than Full House Resorts.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Full House Resorts
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Bragg Gaming Group
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

Full House Resorts beats Bragg Gaming Group on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Full House Resorts compare to Century Casinos?

Full House Resorts (NASDAQ:FLL) and Century Casinos (NASDAQ:CNTY) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings and risk.

Full House Resorts has a beta of 1.24, suggesting that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Century Casinos has a beta of 1.68, suggesting that its share price is 68% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Full House Resorts had 1 more articles in the media than Century Casinos. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Full House Resorts and 3 mentions for Century Casinos. Full House Resorts' average media sentiment score of 0.04 beat Century Casinos' score of -0.10 indicating that Full House Resorts is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Full House Resorts
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Century Casinos
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Full House Resorts currently has a consensus price target of $3.50, indicating a potential upside of 56.95%. Century Casinos has a consensus price target of $3.00, indicating a potential upside of 134.38%. Given Century Casinos' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Century Casinos is more favorable than Full House Resorts.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Full House Resorts
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Century Casinos
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Full House Resorts has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Century Casinos. Full House Resorts is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Century Casinos, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Full House Resorts$302.38M0.27-$40.20M-$1.02N/A
Century Casinos$572.97M0.06-$61.42M-$1.93N/A

Century Casinos has a net margin of -9.62% compared to Full House Resorts' net margin of -12.06%. Full House Resorts' return on equity of -473.31% beat Century Casinos' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Full House Resorts-12.06% -473.31% -5.78%
Century Casinos -9.62%-3,789.52%-4.93%

37.7% of Full House Resorts shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.4% of Century Casinos shares are held by institutional investors. 10.6% of Full House Resorts shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 15.0% of Century Casinos shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Full House Resorts and Century Casinos tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Full House Resorts News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FLL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FLL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FLL vs. The Competition

Export
MetricFull House ResortsHotels, Restaurants & Leisure IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$83.41M$8.29B$13.22B$13.10B
Dividend YieldN/A3.74%54.81%10.45%
P/E Ratio-2.1923.0546.7625.28
Price / Sales0.27338.7591.0491.83
Price / Cash15.4622.3426.4050.90
Price / Book-6.034.984.336.24
Net Income-$40.20M$260.07M$443.58M$347.60M
7 Day Performance-8.23%1.19%-0.42%1.06%
1 Month Performance-11.86%1.94%1.54%0.81%
1 Year Performance-37.18%-1.48%0.71%20.90%

Full House Resorts Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FLL
Full House Resorts
2.2151 of 5 stars		$2.23
-3.0%		$3.50
+57.0%		-38.1%$83.41M$302.38MN/A1,847
INSE
Inspired Entertainment
3.7108 of 5 stars		$6.65
+0.5%		$20.00
+200.8%		-25.3%$176.59M$304.10MN/A1,020
MRDN
Meridian
1.7899 of 5 stars		$14.42
+4.9%		$21.60
+49.8%		N/A$174.08M$182.86MN/A1,200
CPHC
Canterbury Park
0.6529 of 5 stars		$15.55
+1.9%		N/A-9.0%$78.61M$59.57MN/A1,096
BRAG
Bragg Gaming Group
2.0863 of 5 stars		$1.68
+3.1%		$5.33
+217.5%		-49.8%$49.67M$119.98MN/A290

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:FLL) was last updated on 8/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book is inside
The "Sucker's Bet" Most New Options Traders Fall For Most people who try options lose money the same way. ...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel