Free Trial

Full House Resorts (FLL) Competitors

Full House Resorts logo
$2.67 +0.02 (+0.75%)
As of 10:28 AM Eastern

FLL vs. LOCO, CVEO, BRCB, PLAY, and PTLO

Should you buy Full House Resorts stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Full House Resorts with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Full House Resorts include El Pollo Loco (LOCO), Civeo (CVEO), Black Rock Coffee Bar (BRCB), Dave & Buster's Entertainment (PLAY), and Portillo's (PTLO). These companies are all part of the "restaurants, hotels, motels" industry.

How does Full House Resorts compare to El Pollo Loco?

Full House Resorts (NASDAQ:FLL) and El Pollo Loco (NASDAQ:LOCO) are both small-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends and risk.

El Pollo Loco has higher revenue and earnings than Full House Resorts. Full House Resorts is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than El Pollo Loco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Full House Resorts$302.38M0.32-$40.20M-$1.07N/A
El Pollo Loco$490.05M0.87$26.49M$0.9814.31

Full House Resorts currently has a consensus target price of $4.00, indicating a potential upside of 49.81%. El Pollo Loco has a consensus target price of $14.88, indicating a potential upside of 6.10%. Given Full House Resorts' higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Full House Resorts is more favorable than El Pollo Loco.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Full House Resorts
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
El Pollo Loco
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

Full House Resorts has a beta of 1.21, suggesting that its share price is 21% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, El Pollo Loco has a beta of 0.79, suggesting that its share price is 21% less volatile than the broader market.

37.7% of Full House Resorts shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.3% of El Pollo Loco shares are held by institutional investors. 10.6% of Full House Resorts shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of El Pollo Loco shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

El Pollo Loco has a net margin of 5.87% compared to Full House Resorts' net margin of -12.79%. El Pollo Loco's return on equity of 11.04% beat Full House Resorts' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Full House Resorts-12.79% -473.31% -5.99%
El Pollo Loco 5.87%11.04%5.26%

In the previous week, Full House Resorts and Full House Resorts both had 1 articles in the media. Full House Resorts' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled El Pollo Loco'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Full House Resorts
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
El Pollo Loco
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

El Pollo Loco beats Full House Resorts on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Full House Resorts compare to Civeo?

Full House Resorts (NASDAQ:FLL) and Civeo (NYSE:CVEO) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, valuation, earnings and dividends.

In the previous week, Full House Resorts and Full House Resorts both had 1 articles in the media. Civeo's average media sentiment score of 0.39 beat Full House Resorts' score of 0.00 indicating that Civeo is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Full House Resorts
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Civeo
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

37.7% of Full House Resorts shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.4% of Civeo shares are held by institutional investors. 10.6% of Full House Resorts shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.5% of Civeo shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Full House Resorts has a beta of 1.21, meaning that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Civeo has a beta of 0.73, meaning that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

Civeo has higher revenue and earnings than Full House Resorts. Civeo is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Full House Resorts, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Full House Resorts$302.38M0.32-$40.20M-$1.07N/A
Civeo$638.85M0.59-$20.07M-$1.19N/A

Civeo has a net margin of -2.10% compared to Full House Resorts' net margin of -12.79%. Civeo's return on equity of -7.72% beat Full House Resorts' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Full House Resorts-12.79% -473.31% -5.99%
Civeo -2.10%-7.72%-2.85%

Full House Resorts currently has a consensus price target of $4.00, indicating a potential upside of 49.81%. Civeo has a consensus price target of $37.00, indicating a potential upside of 6.91%. Given Full House Resorts' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Full House Resorts is more favorable than Civeo.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Full House Resorts
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
Civeo
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

Civeo beats Full House Resorts on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Full House Resorts compare to Black Rock Coffee Bar?

Full House Resorts (NASDAQ:FLL) and Black Rock Coffee Bar (NASDAQ:BRCB) are both small-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk and analyst recommendations.

37.7% of Full House Resorts shares are held by institutional investors. 10.6% of Full House Resorts shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 32.0% of Black Rock Coffee Bar shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Full House Resorts currently has a consensus price target of $4.00, suggesting a potential upside of 49.81%. Black Rock Coffee Bar has a consensus price target of $18.75, suggesting a potential upside of 159.70%. Given Black Rock Coffee Bar's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Black Rock Coffee Bar is more favorable than Full House Resorts.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Full House Resorts
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
Black Rock Coffee Bar
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Black Rock Coffee Bar has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Full House Resorts. Full House Resorts is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Black Rock Coffee Bar, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Full House Resorts$302.38M0.32-$40.20M-$1.07N/A
Black Rock Coffee Bar$200.32M1.80-$16.44M$0.01722.00

Black Rock Coffee Bar has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Full House Resorts' net margin of -12.79%. Black Rock Coffee Bar's return on equity of 0.00% beat Full House Resorts' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Full House Resorts-12.79% -473.31% -5.99%
Black Rock Coffee Bar N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Black Rock Coffee Bar had 20 more articles in the media than Full House Resorts. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for Black Rock Coffee Bar and 1 mentions for Full House Resorts. Black Rock Coffee Bar's average media sentiment score of 0.41 beat Full House Resorts' score of 0.00 indicating that Black Rock Coffee Bar is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Full House Resorts
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Black Rock Coffee Bar
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
9 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
2 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Black Rock Coffee Bar beats Full House Resorts on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Full House Resorts compare to Dave & Buster's Entertainment?

Full House Resorts (NASDAQ:FLL) and Dave & Buster's Entertainment (NASDAQ:PLAY) are both small-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk and dividends.

Full House Resorts has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Dave & Buster's Entertainment. Dave & Buster's Entertainment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Full House Resorts, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Full House Resorts$302.38M0.32-$40.20M-$1.07N/A
Dave & Buster's Entertainment$2.10B0.21-$48.70M-$1.43N/A

Full House Resorts has a beta of 1.21, indicating that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Dave & Buster's Entertainment has a beta of 1.78, indicating that its stock price is 78% more volatile than the broader market.

Full House Resorts presently has a consensus target price of $4.00, indicating a potential upside of 49.81%. Dave & Buster's Entertainment has a consensus target price of $21.83, indicating a potential upside of 73.56%. Given Dave & Buster's Entertainment's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Dave & Buster's Entertainment is more favorable than Full House Resorts.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Full House Resorts
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
Dave & Buster's Entertainment
2 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.13

Dave & Buster's Entertainment has a net margin of -2.32% compared to Full House Resorts' net margin of -12.79%. Dave & Buster's Entertainment's return on equity of -7.93% beat Full House Resorts' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Full House Resorts-12.79% -473.31% -5.99%
Dave & Buster's Entertainment -2.32%-7.93%-0.26%

In the previous week, Dave & Buster's Entertainment had 1 more articles in the media than Full House Resorts. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Dave & Buster's Entertainment and 1 mentions for Full House Resorts. Full House Resorts' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Dave & Buster's Entertainment's score of -0.04 indicating that Full House Resorts is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Full House Resorts
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Dave & Buster's Entertainment
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

37.7% of Full House Resorts shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.5% of Dave & Buster's Entertainment shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.6% of Full House Resorts shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Dave & Buster's Entertainment shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Dave & Buster's Entertainment beats Full House Resorts on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Full House Resorts compare to Portillo's?

Portillo's (NASDAQ:PTLO) and Full House Resorts (NASDAQ:FLL) are both small-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

Portillo's presently has a consensus price target of $7.02, indicating a potential upside of 72.13%. Full House Resorts has a consensus price target of $4.00, indicating a potential upside of 49.81%. Given Portillo's' higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Portillo's is more favorable than Full House Resorts.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Portillo's
1 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.14
Full House Resorts
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

98.3% of Portillo's shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.7% of Full House Resorts shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.3% of Portillo's shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.6% of Full House Resorts shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Portillo's has a beta of 1.72, meaning that its share price is 72% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Full House Resorts has a beta of 1.21, meaning that its share price is 21% more volatile than the broader market.

Portillo's has a net margin of 2.12% compared to Full House Resorts' net margin of -12.79%. Portillo's' return on equity of 3.17% beat Full House Resorts' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Portillo's2.12% 3.17% 0.98%
Full House Resorts -12.79%-473.31%-5.99%

In the previous week, Portillo's had 1 more articles in the media than Full House Resorts. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Portillo's and 1 mentions for Full House Resorts. Portillo's' average media sentiment score of 0.25 beat Full House Resorts' score of 0.00 indicating that Portillo's is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Portillo's
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Full House Resorts
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Portillo's has higher revenue and earnings than Full House Resorts. Full House Resorts is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Portillo's, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Portillo's$732.07M0.42$19.34M$0.2119.43
Full House Resorts$302.38M0.32-$40.20M-$1.07N/A

Summary

Portillo's beats Full House Resorts on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Full House Resorts News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FLL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FLL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FLL vs. The Competition

MetricFull House ResortsGAMING IndustryDiscretionary SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$96.81M$6.21B$7.26B$12.44B
Dividend YieldN/A1.18%2.94%5.28%
P/E Ratio-2.5027.3318.5825.77
Price / Sales0.322.713.4187.38
Price / Cash17.8420.5114.7756.67
Price / Book-17.806.383.717.20
Net Income-$40.20M-$17.83M$238.79M$335.78M
7 Day Performance-1.84%2.07%2.59%4.04%
1 Month Performance7.23%0.42%14.89%2.70%
1 Year Performance-21.01%-11.28%18.99%36.92%

Full House Resorts Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FLL
Full House Resorts
1.8424 of 5 stars
$2.67
+0.8%
$4.00
+49.8%
-21.6%$96.81M$302.38MN/A1,847
LOCO
El Pollo Loco
2.6184 of 5 stars
$13.44
-0.3%
$14.88
+10.7%
+54.1%$410.54M$490.05M13.714,034
CVEO
Civeo
1.4331 of 5 stars
$34.03
-4.3%
$37.00
+8.7%
+61.5%$389.14M$638.85MN/A2,700
BRCB
Black Rock Coffee Bar
4.7122 of 5 stars
$7.01
-2.1%
$18.75
+167.5%
N/A$358.40M$200.32MN/A2,800
PLAY
Dave & Buster's Entertainment
1.7693 of 5 stars
$10.11
-1.2%
$21.83
+116.0%
-42.8%$355.38M$2.10BN/A23,610

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:FLL) was last updated on 5/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners