Do analysts recommend FLL or CPHC?

Full House Resorts currently has a consensus price target of $3.50, indicating a potential upside of 100.00%. Given Full House Resorts' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Full House Resorts is more favorable than Canterbury Park. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Full House Resorts 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50 Canterbury Park 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Full House Resorts (FLL) Competitors

$1.75 -0.03 (-1.69%)

Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$1.76 +0.00 (+0.29%)

As of 07:30 PM Eastern

Compare

FLL vs. MRDN, INSE, CPHC, BRAG, and CNTY

Should you buy Full House Resorts stock or one of its competitors? Full House Resorts's main competitors and comparable companies include Meridian (MRDN), Inspired Entertainment (INSE), Canterbury Park (CPHC), Bragg Gaming Group (BRAG), and Century Casinos (CNTY). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "casinos & gaming" industry.

How does Full House Resorts compare to Meridian?

Meridian (NASDAQ:MRDN) and Full House Resorts (NASDAQ:FLL) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Full House Resorts has a net margin of -12.06% compared to Meridian's net margin of -41.41%. Meridian's return on equity of -117.87% beat Full House Resorts' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Meridian	-41.41%	-117.87%	-58.87%
Full House Resorts	-12.06%	-473.31%	-5.78%

Meridian presently has a consensus price target of $21.60, suggesting a potential upside of 63.27%. Full House Resorts has a consensus price target of $3.50, suggesting a potential upside of 100.00%. Given Full House Resorts' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Full House Resorts is more favorable than Meridian.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Meridian	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Full House Resorts	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Meridian has a beta of 0.68, meaning that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Full House Resorts has a beta of 1.22, meaning that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the broader market.

Full House Resorts has higher revenue and earnings than Meridian. Meridian is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Full House Resorts, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Meridian	$182.86M	0.92	-$89.90M	-$6.74	N/A
Full House Resorts	$302.38M	0.21	-$40.20M	-$1.02	N/A

In the previous week, Meridian had 1 more articles in the media than Full House Resorts. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Meridian and 1 mentions for Full House Resorts. Full House Resorts' average media sentiment score of 0.21 beat Meridian's score of 0.00 indicating that Full House Resorts is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Meridian	Neutral
Full House Resorts	Neutral

2.7% of Meridian shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.7% of Full House Resorts shares are held by institutional investors. 9.4% of Meridian shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 10.6% of Full House Resorts shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Full House Resorts beats Meridian on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Full House Resorts compare to Inspired Entertainment?

Inspired Entertainment (NASDAQ:INSE) and Full House Resorts (NASDAQ:FLL) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, valuation, dividends and profitability.

Inspired Entertainment has higher revenue and earnings than Full House Resorts. Inspired Entertainment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Full House Resorts, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Inspired Entertainment	$304.10M	0.40	-$17M	-$0.33	N/A
Full House Resorts	$302.38M	0.21	-$40.20M	-$1.02	N/A

In the previous week, Inspired Entertainment had 3 more articles in the media than Full House Resorts. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Inspired Entertainment and 1 mentions for Full House Resorts. Inspired Entertainment's average media sentiment score of 1.24 beat Full House Resorts' score of 0.21 indicating that Inspired Entertainment is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Inspired Entertainment	Positive
Full House Resorts	Neutral

Inspired Entertainment currently has a consensus price target of $20.00, suggesting a potential upside of 333.84%. Full House Resorts has a consensus price target of $3.50, suggesting a potential upside of 100.00%. Given Inspired Entertainment's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Inspired Entertainment is more favorable than Full House Resorts.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Inspired Entertainment	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Full House Resorts	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Inspired Entertainment has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Full House Resorts has a beta of 1.22, suggesting that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the broader market.

Inspired Entertainment has a net margin of -3.34% compared to Full House Resorts' net margin of -12.06%. Inspired Entertainment's return on equity of -30.08% beat Full House Resorts' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Inspired Entertainment	-3.34%	-30.08%	0.92%
Full House Resorts	-12.06%	-473.31%	-5.78%

77.4% of Inspired Entertainment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.7% of Full House Resorts shares are held by institutional investors. 14.4% of Inspired Entertainment shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.6% of Full House Resorts shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Inspired Entertainment beats Full House Resorts on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Full House Resorts compare to Canterbury Park?

Full House Resorts (NASDAQ:FLL) and Canterbury Park (NASDAQ:CPHC) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, dividends, profitability and institutional ownership.

Canterbury Park has a net margin of 0.20% compared to Full House Resorts' net margin of -12.06%. Canterbury Park's return on equity of 0.14% beat Full House Resorts' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Full House Resorts	-12.06%	-473.31%	-5.78%
Canterbury Park	0.20%	0.14%	0.10%

Full House Resorts has a beta of 1.22, suggesting that its share price is 22% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Canterbury Park has a beta of -0.39, suggesting that its share price is 139% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Full House Resorts and Full House Resorts both had 1 articles in the media. Full House Resorts' average media sentiment score of 0.21 beat Canterbury Park's score of 0.00 indicating that Full House Resorts is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Full House Resorts	Neutral
Canterbury Park	Neutral

Full House Resorts currently has a consensus price target of $3.50, indicating a potential upside of 100.00%. Given Full House Resorts' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Full House Resorts is more favorable than Canterbury Park.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Full House Resorts	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Canterbury Park	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Canterbury Park has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Full House Resorts. Full House Resorts is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Canterbury Park, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Full House Resorts	$302.38M	0.21	-$40.20M	-$1.02	N/A
Canterbury Park	$59.57M	1.36	-$530K	$0.02	782.50

37.7% of Full House Resorts shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.4% of Canterbury Park shares are held by institutional investors. 10.6% of Full House Resorts shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 23.7% of Canterbury Park shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Canterbury Park beats Full House Resorts on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Full House Resorts compare to Bragg Gaming Group?

Bragg Gaming Group (NASDAQ:BRAG) and Full House Resorts (NASDAQ:FLL) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, institutional ownership and profitability.

Bragg Gaming Group currently has a consensus target price of $5.00, suggesting a potential upside of 262.06%. Full House Resorts has a consensus target price of $3.50, suggesting a potential upside of 100.00%. Given Bragg Gaming Group's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Bragg Gaming Group is more favorable than Full House Resorts.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Bragg Gaming Group	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Full House Resorts	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Bragg Gaming Group has a net margin of -7.48% compared to Full House Resorts' net margin of -12.06%. Bragg Gaming Group's return on equity of -12.70% beat Full House Resorts' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Bragg Gaming Group	-7.48%	-12.70%	-8.22%
Full House Resorts	-12.06%	-473.31%	-5.78%

In the previous week, Bragg Gaming Group had 1 more articles in the media than Full House Resorts. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Bragg Gaming Group and 1 mentions for Full House Resorts. Full House Resorts' average media sentiment score of 0.21 beat Bragg Gaming Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Full House Resorts is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Bragg Gaming Group	Neutral
Full House Resorts	Neutral

4.0% of Bragg Gaming Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.7% of Full House Resorts shares are held by institutional investors. 26.4% of Bragg Gaming Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 10.6% of Full House Resorts shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Bragg Gaming Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Full House Resorts. Bragg Gaming Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Full House Resorts, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Bragg Gaming Group	$119.98M	0.35	-$9.18M	-$0.36	N/A
Full House Resorts	$302.38M	0.21	-$40.20M	-$1.02	N/A

Bragg Gaming Group has a beta of 0.84, indicating that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Full House Resorts has a beta of 1.22, indicating that its share price is 22% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Bragg Gaming Group and Full House Resorts tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Full House Resorts compare to Century Casinos?

Full House Resorts (NASDAQ:FLL) and Century Casinos (NASDAQ:CNTY) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability and dividends.

In the previous week, Full House Resorts and Full House Resorts both had 1 articles in the media. Full House Resorts' average media sentiment score of 0.21 beat Century Casinos' score of 0.15 indicating that Full House Resorts is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Full House Resorts	Neutral
Century Casinos	Neutral

37.7% of Full House Resorts shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.4% of Century Casinos shares are held by institutional investors. 10.6% of Full House Resorts shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.0% of Century Casinos shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Full House Resorts has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Century Casinos. Full House Resorts is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Century Casinos, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Full House Resorts	$302.38M	0.21	-$40.20M	-$1.02	N/A
Century Casinos	$572.97M	0.05	-$61.42M	-$1.93	N/A

Full House Resorts has a beta of 1.22, indicating that its share price is 22% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Century Casinos has a beta of 1.66, indicating that its share price is 66% more volatile than the broader market.

Full House Resorts presently has a consensus price target of $3.50, suggesting a potential upside of 100.00%. Century Casinos has a consensus price target of $3.00, suggesting a potential upside of 170.27%. Given Century Casinos' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Century Casinos is more favorable than Full House Resorts.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Full House Resorts	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Century Casinos	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Century Casinos has a net margin of -9.62% compared to Full House Resorts' net margin of -12.06%. Full House Resorts' return on equity of -473.31% beat Century Casinos' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Full House Resorts	-12.06%	-473.31%	-5.78%
Century Casinos	-9.62%	-3,789.52%	-4.93%

Summary

Century Casinos beats Full House Resorts on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Full House Resorts News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FLL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

FLL vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Full House Resorts	Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry	Consumer Discretionary Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$69.99M	$7.34B	$12.62B	$13.29B
Dividend Yield	N/A	3.94%	60.55%	12.57%
P/E Ratio	-1.72	19.96	42.17	21.27
Price / Sales	0.21	339.45	93.35	87.10
Price / Cash	12.97	21.22	28.52	52.76
Price / Book	25.00	4.37	3.89	6.34
Net Income	-$40.20M	$262.26M	$445.57M	$360.00M
7 Day Performance	-6.42%	-1.65%	-1.10%	-0.11%
1 Month Performance	-18.22%	-8.46%	-5.44%	-3.42%
1 Year Performance	-48.68%	-8.25%	-7.99%	5.46%

Full House Resorts Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
FLL Full House Resorts	2.444 of 5 stars	$1.75 -1.7%	$3.50 +100.0%	-48.6%	$69.99M	$302.38M	N/A	1,847
MRDN Meridian	1.2739 of 5 stars	$13.71 flat	$21.60 +57.5%	N/A	$173.69M	$197.19M	N/A	1,200
INSE Inspired Entertainment	3.4125 of 5 stars	$5.10 -3.2%	$20.00 +292.2%	-53.3%	$138.91M	$304.10M	N/A	1,020	News Coverage Positive News High Trading Volume
CPHC Canterbury Park	0.4315 of 5 stars	$15.85 -0.9%	N/A	-4.1%	$82.88M	$60.44M	792.50	1,096	Gap Down
BRAG Bragg Gaming Group	1.7234 of 5 stars	$1.34 +2.3%	$5.00 +273.1%	-47.6%	$39.92M	$119.98M	N/A	290

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:FLL) was last updated on 9/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Full House Resorts (FLL) Competitors

FLL vs. MRDN, INSE, CPHC, BRAG, and CNTY

How does Full House Resorts compare to Meridian?

Summary

How does Full House Resorts compare to Inspired Entertainment?

Summary

How does Full House Resorts compare to Canterbury Park?

Summary

How does Full House Resorts compare to Bragg Gaming Group?

Summary

How does Full House Resorts compare to Century Casinos?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FLL vs. The Competition

Full House Resorts Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Full House Resorts (FLL) Competitors

FLL vs. MRDN, INSE, CPHC, BRAG, and CNTY

How does Full House Resorts compare to Meridian?

Is MRDN or FLL more profitable?

Do analysts prefer MRDN or FLL?

Which has more volatility & risk, MRDN or FLL?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, MRDN or FLL?

Does the media favor MRDN or FLL?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in MRDN or FLL?

Summary

How does Full House Resorts compare to Inspired Entertainment?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, INSE or FLL?

Does the media refer more to INSE or FLL?

Do analysts rate INSE or FLL?

Which has more volatility and risk, INSE or FLL?

Is INSE or FLL more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in INSE or FLL?

Summary

How does Full House Resorts compare to Canterbury Park?

Is FLL or CPHC more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, FLL or CPHC?

Does the media refer more to FLL or CPHC?

Do analysts recommend FLL or CPHC?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, FLL or CPHC?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in FLL or CPHC?

Summary

How does Full House Resorts compare to Bragg Gaming Group?

Do analysts prefer BRAG or FLL?

Is BRAG or FLL more profitable?

Does the media favor BRAG or FLL?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of BRAG or FLL?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, BRAG or FLL?

Which has more risk and volatility, BRAG or FLL?

Summary

How does Full House Resorts compare to Century Casinos?

Does the media refer more to FLL or CNTY?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of FLL or CNTY?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, FLL or CNTY?

Which has more volatility and risk, FLL or CNTY?

Do analysts prefer FLL or CNTY?

Is FLL or CNTY more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FLL vs. The Competition

Full House Resorts Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools