Go Pro

Full House Resorts (FLL) Competitors

Full House Resorts logo
$2.33 -0.06 (-2.51%)
Closing price 07/24/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$2.34 +0.00 (+0.21%)
As of 07/24/2026 04:14 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

FLL vs. PTLO, GHG, HCHL, NDLS, and LVO

Should you buy Full House Resorts stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Full House Resorts with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Full House Resorts include Portillo's (PTLO), GreenTree Hospitality Group (GHG), Happy City (HCHL), Noodles & Company (NDLS), and LiveOne (LVO). These companies are all part of the "restaurants, hotels, motels" industry.

How does Full House Resorts compare to Portillo's?

Portillo's (NASDAQ:PTLO) and Full House Resorts (NASDAQ:FLL) are both small-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and valuation.

Portillo's has higher revenue and earnings than Full House Resorts. Full House Resorts is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Portillo's, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Portillo's$732.07M0.45$19.34M$0.2120.71
Full House Resorts$302.38M0.28-$40.20M-$1.07N/A

Portillo's has a net margin of 2.12% compared to Full House Resorts' net margin of -12.79%. Portillo's' return on equity of 3.17% beat Full House Resorts' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Portillo's2.12% 3.17% 0.98%
Full House Resorts -12.79%-473.31%-5.99%

Portillo's has a beta of 1.56, indicating that its stock price is 56% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Full House Resorts has a beta of 1.2, indicating that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Portillo's had 3 more articles in the media than Full House Resorts. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Portillo's and 1 mentions for Full House Resorts. Full House Resorts' average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Portillo's' score of 0.47 indicating that Full House Resorts is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Portillo's Neutral
Full House Resorts Positive

Portillo's presently has a consensus price target of $5.93, indicating a potential upside of 36.21%. Full House Resorts has a consensus price target of $4.00, indicating a potential upside of 71.67%. Given Full House Resorts' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Full House Resorts is more favorable than Portillo's.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Portillo's
1 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.08
Full House Resorts
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

98.3% of Portillo's shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.7% of Full House Resorts shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.3% of Portillo's shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 10.6% of Full House Resorts shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Portillo's beats Full House Resorts on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Full House Resorts compare to GreenTree Hospitality Group?

GreenTree Hospitality Group (NYSE:GHG) and Full House Resorts (NASDAQ:FLL) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Full House Resorts has a consensus target price of $4.00, suggesting a potential upside of 71.67%. Given Full House Resorts' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Full House Resorts is more favorable than GreenTree Hospitality Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
GreenTree Hospitality Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Full House Resorts
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

8.1% of GreenTree Hospitality Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.7% of Full House Resorts shares are held by institutional investors. 88.7% of GreenTree Hospitality Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 10.6% of Full House Resorts shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

GreenTree Hospitality Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Full House Resorts' net margin of -12.79%. GreenTree Hospitality Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat Full House Resorts' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
GreenTree Hospitality GroupN/A N/A N/A
Full House Resorts -12.79%-473.31%-5.99%

GreenTree Hospitality Group has a beta of 0.65, meaning that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Full House Resorts has a beta of 1.2, meaning that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, GreenTree Hospitality Group had 1 more articles in the media than Full House Resorts. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for GreenTree Hospitality Group and 1 mentions for Full House Resorts. Full House Resorts' average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat GreenTree Hospitality Group's score of 0.84 indicating that Full House Resorts is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
GreenTree Hospitality Group Positive
Full House Resorts Positive

GreenTree Hospitality Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Full House Resorts. GreenTree Hospitality Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Full House Resorts, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GreenTree Hospitality Group$156.92M0.72$23.85M-$0.08N/A
Full House Resorts$302.38M0.28-$40.20M-$1.07N/A

Summary

GreenTree Hospitality Group and Full House Resorts tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Full House Resorts compare to Happy City?

Happy City (NASDAQ:HCHL) and Full House Resorts (NASDAQ:FLL) are both small-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership and earnings.

Happy City has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Full House Resorts' net margin of -12.79%. Happy City's return on equity of 0.00% beat Full House Resorts' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Happy CityN/A N/A N/A
Full House Resorts -12.79%-473.31%-5.99%

In the previous week, Happy City and Happy City both had 1 articles in the media. Happy City's average media sentiment score of 1.92 beat Full House Resorts' score of 1.04 indicating that Happy City is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Happy City Very Positive
Full House Resorts Positive

Full House Resorts has a consensus target price of $4.00, suggesting a potential upside of 71.67%. Given Full House Resorts' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Full House Resorts is more favorable than Happy City.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Happy City
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Full House Resorts
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

37.7% of Full House Resorts shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.6% of Full House Resorts shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Happy City has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Full House Resorts.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Happy City$6.80M17.34-$2.43MN/AN/A
Full House Resorts$302.38M0.28-$40.20M-$1.07N/A

Summary

Happy City and Full House Resorts tied by winning 6 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Full House Resorts compare to Noodles & Company?

Noodles & Company (NASDAQ:NDLS) and Full House Resorts (NASDAQ:FLL) are both small-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability and media sentiment.

Noodles & Company has a beta of 1.38, meaning that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Full House Resorts has a beta of 1.2, meaning that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the broader market.

Full House Resorts has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Noodles & Company. Noodles & Company is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Full House Resorts, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Noodles & Company$495.09M0.18-$42.57M-$6.38N/A
Full House Resorts$302.38M0.28-$40.20M-$1.07N/A

65.7% of Noodles & Company shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.7% of Full House Resorts shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of Noodles & Company shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.6% of Full House Resorts shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Noodles & Company had 8 more articles in the media than Full House Resorts. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Noodles & Company and 1 mentions for Full House Resorts. Full House Resorts' average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Noodles & Company's score of 0.70 indicating that Full House Resorts is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Noodles & Company Positive
Full House Resorts Positive

Noodles & Company has a net margin of -7.46% compared to Full House Resorts' net margin of -12.79%. Noodles & Company's return on equity of 0.00% beat Full House Resorts' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Noodles & Company-7.46% N/A -5.63%
Full House Resorts -12.79%-473.31%-5.99%

Full House Resorts has a consensus target price of $4.00, suggesting a potential upside of 71.67%. Given Full House Resorts' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Full House Resorts is more favorable than Noodles & Company.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Noodles & Company
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
Full House Resorts
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

Summary

Full House Resorts beats Noodles & Company on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Full House Resorts compare to LiveOne?

Full House Resorts (NASDAQ:FLL) and LiveOne (NASDAQ:LVO) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, earnings, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Full House Resorts has a net margin of -12.79% compared to LiveOne's net margin of -27.22%. LiveOne's return on equity of 0.00% beat Full House Resorts' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Full House Resorts-12.79% -473.31% -5.99%
LiveOne -27.22%N/A -41.60%

37.7% of Full House Resorts shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 21.3% of LiveOne shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.6% of Full House Resorts shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 24.6% of LiveOne shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Full House Resorts has a beta of 1.2, meaning that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, LiveOne has a beta of 1.6, meaning that its stock price is 60% more volatile than the broader market.

LiveOne has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Full House Resorts. LiveOne is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Full House Resorts, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Full House Resorts$302.38M0.28-$40.20M-$1.07N/A
LiveOne$77.14M0.86-$20.97M-$1.94N/A

Full House Resorts presently has a consensus price target of $4.00, indicating a potential upside of 71.67%. LiveOne has a consensus price target of $12.50, indicating a potential upside of 156.67%. Given LiveOne's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe LiveOne is more favorable than Full House Resorts.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Full House Resorts
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
LiveOne
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

In the previous week, LiveOne had 1 more articles in the media than Full House Resorts. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for LiveOne and 1 mentions for Full House Resorts. Full House Resorts' average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat LiveOne's score of 0.59 indicating that Full House Resorts is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Full House Resorts Positive
LiveOne Positive

Summary

LiveOne beats Full House Resorts on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Full House Resorts News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FLL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FLL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FLL vs. The Competition

MetricFull House ResortsGAMING IndustryDiscretionary SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$84.50M$6.33B$7.07B$12.20B
Dividend YieldN/A1.38%3.02%9.41%
P/E Ratio-2.1827.6719.7823.62
Price / Sales0.282.623.8389.60
Price / Cash15.6620.1415.0958.78
Price / Book33.296.903.636.01
Net Income-$40.20M$34.24M$247.04M$331.99M
7 Day Performance-2.92%2.37%-1.64%-0.63%
1 Month Performance-16.49%0.50%-2.09%-3.04%
1 Year Performance-51.66%-23.99%-4.07%13.30%

Full House Resorts Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FLL
Full House Resorts
1.95 of 5 stars
$2.33
-2.5%
$4.00
+71.7%
-51.7%$84.50M$302.38MN/A1,847
PTLO
Portillo's
4.9562 of 5 stars
$4.67
-0.8%
$6.03
+29.0%
-58.9%$357.04M$732.07M22.247,890
GHG
GreenTree Hospitality Group
1.3918 of 5 stars
$1.17
+0.1%
N/A-51.2%$118.05M$156.92MN/A2,287
HCHL
Happy City
0.8084 of 5 stars
$3.96
flat
N/AN/A$117.90M$6.80MN/A104
NDLS
Noodles & Company
0.7035 of 5 stars
$11.11
-3.4%
N/A+102.1%$67.76M$495.09MN/A6,500

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:FLL) was last updated on 7/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners