Go Pro

Frequency Electronics (FEIM) Competitors

Frequency Electronics logo
$61.69 -3.85 (-5.87%)
As of 08/21/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

FEIM vs. LASR, OUST, ARLO, AEVA, and NSSC

Should you buy Frequency Electronics stock or one of its competitors? Frequency Electronics's main competitors and comparable companies include nLight (LASR), Ouster (OUST), Arlo Technologies (ARLO), Aeva Technologies (AEVA), and NAPCO Security Technologies (NSSC). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "electronic equipment & instruments" industry.

How does Frequency Electronics compare to nLight?

Frequency Electronics (NASDAQ:FEIM) and nLight (NASDAQ:LASR) are both technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, profitability and risk.

Frequency Electronics has a net margin of -1.43% compared to nLight's net margin of -4.02%. Frequency Electronics' return on equity of -1.56% beat nLight's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Frequency Electronics-1.43% -1.56% -0.98%
nLight -4.02%-2.83%-2.26%

In the previous week, nLight had 4 more articles in the media than Frequency Electronics. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for nLight and 2 mentions for Frequency Electronics. nLight's average media sentiment score of 1.15 beat Frequency Electronics' score of 0.84 indicating that nLight is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Frequency Electronics
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
nLight
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

58.6% of Frequency Electronics shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.9% of nLight shares are held by institutional investors. 28.0% of Frequency Electronics shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of nLight shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Frequency Electronics has a beta of 0.73, indicating that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, nLight has a beta of 2.31, indicating that its stock price is 131% more volatile than the broader market.

Frequency Electronics currently has a consensus price target of $43.67, suggesting a potential downside of 29.22%. nLight has a consensus price target of $87.94, suggesting a potential upside of 85.56%. Given nLight's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe nLight is more favorable than Frequency Electronics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Frequency Electronics
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
nLight
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.82

Frequency Electronics has higher earnings, but lower revenue than nLight. Frequency Electronics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than nLight, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Frequency Electronics$63.23M9.63-$900K-$0.09N/A
nLight$261.33M10.46-$23.47M-$0.25N/A

Summary

nLight beats Frequency Electronics on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Frequency Electronics compare to Ouster?

Ouster (NASDAQ:OUST) and Frequency Electronics (NASDAQ:FEIM) are both technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, earnings, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Ouster has a beta of 3.24, meaning that its stock price is 224% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Frequency Electronics has a beta of 0.73, meaning that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

Frequency Electronics has a net margin of -1.43% compared to Ouster's net margin of -26.02%. Frequency Electronics' return on equity of -1.56% beat Ouster's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ouster-26.02% -17.49% -12.97%
Frequency Electronics -1.43%-1.56%-0.98%

In the previous week, Ouster had 7 more articles in the media than Frequency Electronics. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Ouster and 2 mentions for Frequency Electronics. Frequency Electronics' average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Ouster's score of 0.66 indicating that Frequency Electronics is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Ouster
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Frequency Electronics
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

31.5% of Ouster shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.6% of Frequency Electronics shares are held by institutional investors. 5.7% of Ouster shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 28.0% of Frequency Electronics shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Frequency Electronics has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Ouster. Frequency Electronics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ouster, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ouster$169.38M16.36-$60.38M-$0.86N/A
Frequency Electronics$63.23M9.63-$900K-$0.09N/A

Ouster presently has a consensus target price of $54.67, indicating a potential upside of 42.29%. Frequency Electronics has a consensus target price of $43.67, indicating a potential downside of 29.22%. Given Ouster's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Ouster is more favorable than Frequency Electronics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ouster
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56
Frequency Electronics
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Frequency Electronics beats Ouster on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Frequency Electronics compare to Arlo Technologies?

Arlo Technologies (NYSE:ARLO) and Frequency Electronics (NASDAQ:FEIM) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and earnings.

Arlo Technologies currently has a consensus price target of $20.60, indicating a potential upside of 57.61%. Frequency Electronics has a consensus price target of $43.67, indicating a potential downside of 29.22%. Given Arlo Technologies' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Arlo Technologies is more favorable than Frequency Electronics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Arlo Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71
Frequency Electronics
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Arlo Technologies had 1 more articles in the media than Frequency Electronics. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Arlo Technologies and 2 mentions for Frequency Electronics. Arlo Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.85 beat Frequency Electronics' score of 0.84 indicating that Arlo Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Arlo Technologies
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Frequency Electronics
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Arlo Technologies has a net margin of 5.20% compared to Frequency Electronics' net margin of -1.43%. Arlo Technologies' return on equity of 17.29% beat Frequency Electronics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Arlo Technologies5.20% 17.29% 7.12%
Frequency Electronics -1.43%-1.56%-0.98%

Arlo Technologies has a beta of 1.56, indicating that its stock price is 56% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Frequency Electronics has a beta of 0.73, indicating that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

83.2% of Arlo Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.6% of Frequency Electronics shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.9% of Arlo Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 28.0% of Frequency Electronics shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Arlo Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Frequency Electronics. Frequency Electronics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Arlo Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Arlo Technologies$529.30M2.68$14.93M$0.2748.41
Frequency Electronics$63.23M9.63-$900K-$0.09N/A

Summary

Arlo Technologies beats Frequency Electronics on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Frequency Electronics compare to Aeva Technologies?

Frequency Electronics (NASDAQ:FEIM) and Aeva Technologies (NASDAQ:AEVA) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Frequency Electronics currently has a consensus target price of $43.67, indicating a potential downside of 29.22%. Aeva Technologies has a consensus target price of $31.67, indicating a potential upside of 73.14%. Given Aeva Technologies' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Aeva Technologies is more favorable than Frequency Electronics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Frequency Electronics
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Aeva Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

58.6% of Frequency Electronics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.9% of Aeva Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 28.0% of Frequency Electronics shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 36.7% of Aeva Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Frequency Electronics has a beta of 0.73, meaning that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aeva Technologies has a beta of 2.47, meaning that its stock price is 147% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Aeva Technologies had 4 more articles in the media than Frequency Electronics. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Aeva Technologies and 2 mentions for Frequency Electronics. Frequency Electronics' average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Aeva Technologies' score of 0.09 indicating that Frequency Electronics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Frequency Electronics
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Aeva Technologies
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Frequency Electronics has a net margin of -1.43% compared to Aeva Technologies' net margin of -150.12%. Frequency Electronics' return on equity of -1.56% beat Aeva Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Frequency Electronics-1.43% -1.56% -0.98%
Aeva Technologies -150.12%-859.37%-81.68%

Frequency Electronics has higher revenue and earnings than Aeva Technologies. Frequency Electronics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aeva Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Frequency Electronics$63.23M9.63-$900K-$0.09N/A
Aeva Technologies$18.08M63.77-$145.43M-$2.73N/A

Summary

Frequency Electronics beats Aeva Technologies on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Frequency Electronics compare to NAPCO Security Technologies?

Frequency Electronics (NASDAQ:FEIM) and NAPCO Security Technologies (NASDAQ:NSSC) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and valuation.

58.6% of Frequency Electronics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.1% of NAPCO Security Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 28.0% of Frequency Electronics shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.7% of NAPCO Security Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Frequency Electronics has a beta of 0.73, indicating that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NAPCO Security Technologies has a beta of 1.45, indicating that its share price is 45% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, NAPCO Security Technologies had 7 more articles in the media than Frequency Electronics. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for NAPCO Security Technologies and 2 mentions for Frequency Electronics. NAPCO Security Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat Frequency Electronics' score of 0.84 indicating that NAPCO Security Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Frequency Electronics
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
NAPCO Security Technologies
4 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

NAPCO Security Technologies has a net margin of 18.70% compared to Frequency Electronics' net margin of -1.43%. NAPCO Security Technologies' return on equity of 28.93% beat Frequency Electronics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Frequency Electronics-1.43% -1.56% -0.98%
NAPCO Security Technologies 18.70%28.93%24.39%

Frequency Electronics currently has a consensus target price of $43.67, indicating a potential downside of 29.22%. NAPCO Security Technologies has a consensus target price of $48.67, indicating a potential upside of 27.77%. Given NAPCO Security Technologies' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe NAPCO Security Technologies is more favorable than Frequency Electronics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Frequency Electronics
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
NAPCO Security Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

NAPCO Security Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Frequency Electronics. Frequency Electronics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NAPCO Security Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Frequency Electronics$63.23M9.63-$900K-$0.09N/A
NAPCO Security Technologies$181.62M7.49$43.41M$1.0436.63

Summary

NAPCO Security Technologies beats Frequency Electronics on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Frequency Electronics News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FEIM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FEIM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FEIM vs. The Competition

MetricFrequency ElectronicsElectronic Equipment, Instruments & Components IndustryTechnology SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$608.89M$8.81B$29.53B$12.85B
Dividend YieldN/A2.28%2.75%11.08%
P/E Ratio-685.4431.2273.3524.24
Price / Sales9.6346.42598.8499.81
Price / Cash157.9932.3450.3553.99
Price / Book10.775.439.446.20
Net Income-$900K$203.80M$679.74M$348.59M
7 Day Performance-21.64%-3.52%-1.29%0.08%
1 Month Performance-15.77%1.06%4.03%3.88%
1 Year Performance112.65%826.39%189.70%16.98%

Frequency Electronics Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FEIM
Frequency Electronics
1.1437 of 5 stars
$61.69
-5.9%
$43.67
-29.2%
+112.7%$608.89M$63.23MN/A200
LASR
nLight
3.8023 of 5 stars
$50.46
-1.1%
$87.94
+74.3%
+68.9%$2.83B$261.33MN/A1,100
OUST
Ouster
3.2754 of 5 stars
$45.05
+6.9%
$54.67
+21.3%
+25.4%$2.82B$169.38MN/A280
ARLO
Arlo Technologies
4.0571 of 5 stars
$14.73
flat
$20.60
+39.9%
-25.5%$1.60B$529.30M54.52350
AEVA
Aeva Technologies
3.2942 of 5 stars
$24.38
+2.9%
$31.67
+29.9%
+23.4%$1.54B$18.08MN/A230

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:FEIM) was last updated on 8/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners