Free Trial

Frequency Electronics (FEIM) Competitors

Frequency Electronics logo
$69.16 -3.00 (-4.16%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$68.46 -0.70 (-1.01%)
As of 07:43 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

FEIM vs. ALMR, ALNT, EYPT, TRNS, and CTKB

Should you buy Frequency Electronics stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Frequency Electronics with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Frequency Electronics include Alamar Biosciences (ALMR), Allient (ALNT), Eyepoint Pharmaceuticals (EYPT), Transcat (TRNS), and Cytek Biosciences (CTKB). These companies are all part of the "measuring and control equipment" industry.

How does Frequency Electronics compare to Alamar Biosciences?

Frequency Electronics (NASDAQ:FEIM) and Alamar Biosciences (NASDAQ:ALMR) are both small-cap measuring and control equipment companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.

58.6% of Frequency Electronics shares are owned by institutional investors. 28.0% of Frequency Electronics shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Frequency Electronics has a net margin of 10.78% compared to Alamar Biosciences' net margin of 0.00%. Frequency Electronics' return on equity of 12.69% beat Alamar Biosciences' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Frequency Electronics10.78% 12.69% 7.84%
Alamar Biosciences N/A N/A N/A

Frequency Electronics currently has a consensus price target of $43.67, suggesting a potential downside of 36.86%. Alamar Biosciences has a consensus price target of $30.00, suggesting a potential upside of 43.27%. Given Alamar Biosciences' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Alamar Biosciences is more favorable than Frequency Electronics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Frequency Electronics
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Alamar Biosciences
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Frequency Electronics has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Alamar Biosciences.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Frequency Electronics$69.81M9.75$23.69M$0.7592.21
Alamar Biosciences$87.16M16.65N/AN/AN/A

In the previous week, Frequency Electronics and Frequency Electronics both had 3 articles in the media. Frequency Electronics' average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Alamar Biosciences' score of 0.74 indicating that Frequency Electronics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Frequency Electronics
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Alamar Biosciences
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Frequency Electronics beats Alamar Biosciences on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Frequency Electronics compare to Allient?

Allient (NASDAQ:ALNT) and Frequency Electronics (NASDAQ:FEIM) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership and profitability.

Frequency Electronics has a net margin of 10.78% compared to Allient's net margin of 4.25%. Frequency Electronics' return on equity of 12.69% beat Allient's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Allient4.25% 12.47% 6.37%
Frequency Electronics 10.78%12.69%7.84%

Allient currently has a consensus price target of $77.33, suggesting a potential downside of 10.90%. Frequency Electronics has a consensus price target of $43.67, suggesting a potential downside of 36.86%. Given Allient's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Allient is more favorable than Frequency Electronics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Allient
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Frequency Electronics
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Allient has a beta of 1.63, suggesting that its stock price is 63% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Frequency Electronics has a beta of 0.67, suggesting that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Allient had 3 more articles in the media than Frequency Electronics. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Allient and 3 mentions for Frequency Electronics. Frequency Electronics' average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Allient's score of 0.65 indicating that Frequency Electronics is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Allient
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Frequency Electronics
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Frequency Electronics has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Allient. Allient is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Frequency Electronics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Allient$554.48M2.66$22.03M$1.4360.69
Frequency Electronics$69.81M9.75$23.69M$0.7592.21

61.6% of Allient shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.6% of Frequency Electronics shares are held by institutional investors. 15.0% of Allient shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 28.0% of Frequency Electronics shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Frequency Electronics beats Allient on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Frequency Electronics compare to Eyepoint Pharmaceuticals?

Frequency Electronics (NASDAQ:FEIM) and Eyepoint Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:EYPT) are both small-cap measuring and control equipment companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings and profitability.

58.6% of Frequency Electronics shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.4% of Eyepoint Pharmaceuticals shares are held by institutional investors. 28.0% of Frequency Electronics shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.1% of Eyepoint Pharmaceuticals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Frequency Electronics currently has a consensus price target of $43.67, indicating a potential downside of 36.86%. Eyepoint Pharmaceuticals has a consensus price target of $31.80, indicating a potential upside of 157.70%. Given Eyepoint Pharmaceuticals' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Eyepoint Pharmaceuticals is more favorable than Frequency Electronics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Frequency Electronics
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Eyepoint Pharmaceuticals
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Frequency Electronics has higher revenue and earnings than Eyepoint Pharmaceuticals. Eyepoint Pharmaceuticals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Frequency Electronics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Frequency Electronics$69.81M9.75$23.69M$0.7592.21
Eyepoint Pharmaceuticals$31.37M32.98-$231.96M-$3.50N/A

In the previous week, Frequency Electronics had 2 more articles in the media than Eyepoint Pharmaceuticals. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Frequency Electronics and 1 mentions for Eyepoint Pharmaceuticals. Frequency Electronics' average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Eyepoint Pharmaceuticals' score of 0.94 indicating that Frequency Electronics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Frequency Electronics Positive
Eyepoint Pharmaceuticals Positive

Frequency Electronics has a net margin of 10.78% compared to Eyepoint Pharmaceuticals' net margin of -3,566.63%. Frequency Electronics' return on equity of 12.69% beat Eyepoint Pharmaceuticals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Frequency Electronics10.78% 12.69% 7.84%
Eyepoint Pharmaceuticals -3,566.63%-110.54%-90.15%

Frequency Electronics has a beta of 0.67, indicating that its share price is 33% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Eyepoint Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 1.72, indicating that its share price is 72% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Frequency Electronics beats Eyepoint Pharmaceuticals on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Frequency Electronics compare to Transcat?

Transcat (NASDAQ:TRNS) and Frequency Electronics (NASDAQ:FEIM) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings and profitability.

Frequency Electronics has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Transcat. Frequency Electronics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Transcat, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Transcat$331.88M2.54$5.38M$0.58155.52
Frequency Electronics$69.81M9.75$23.69M$0.7592.21

Transcat currently has a consensus target price of $105.33, suggesting a potential upside of 16.78%. Frequency Electronics has a consensus target price of $43.67, suggesting a potential downside of 36.86%. Given Transcat's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Transcat is more favorable than Frequency Electronics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Transcat
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60
Frequency Electronics
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Transcat had 9 more articles in the media than Frequency Electronics. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Transcat and 3 mentions for Frequency Electronics. Transcat's average media sentiment score of 1.31 beat Frequency Electronics' score of 0.99 indicating that Transcat is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Transcat
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Frequency Electronics
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Transcat has a beta of 0.71, indicating that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Frequency Electronics has a beta of 0.67, indicating that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

Frequency Electronics has a net margin of 10.78% compared to Transcat's net margin of 1.62%. Frequency Electronics' return on equity of 12.69% beat Transcat's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Transcat1.62% 5.84% 3.78%
Frequency Electronics 10.78%12.69%7.84%

98.3% of Transcat shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.6% of Frequency Electronics shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of Transcat shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 28.0% of Frequency Electronics shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Transcat and Frequency Electronics tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Frequency Electronics compare to Cytek Biosciences?

Cytek Biosciences (NASDAQ:CTKB) and Frequency Electronics (NASDAQ:FEIM) are both small-cap measuring and control equipment companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings and profitability.

In the previous week, Cytek Biosciences had 1 more articles in the media than Frequency Electronics. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Cytek Biosciences and 3 mentions for Frequency Electronics. Frequency Electronics' average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Cytek Biosciences' score of 0.30 indicating that Frequency Electronics is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Cytek Biosciences
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Frequency Electronics
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Frequency Electronics has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cytek Biosciences. Cytek Biosciences is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Frequency Electronics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cytek Biosciences$201.49M2.60-$66.54M-$0.57N/A
Frequency Electronics$69.81M9.75$23.69M$0.7592.21

Frequency Electronics has a net margin of 10.78% compared to Cytek Biosciences' net margin of -36.25%. Frequency Electronics' return on equity of 12.69% beat Cytek Biosciences' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cytek Biosciences-36.25% -10.07% -7.56%
Frequency Electronics 10.78%12.69%7.84%

Cytek Biosciences has a beta of 1.18, indicating that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Frequency Electronics has a beta of 0.67, indicating that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

69.5% of Cytek Biosciences shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.6% of Frequency Electronics shares are held by institutional investors. 10.4% of Cytek Biosciences shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 28.0% of Frequency Electronics shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Cytek Biosciences currently has a consensus target price of $5.69, suggesting a potential upside of 40.43%. Frequency Electronics has a consensus target price of $43.67, suggesting a potential downside of 36.86%. Given Cytek Biosciences' higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Cytek Biosciences is more favorable than Frequency Electronics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cytek Biosciences
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Frequency Electronics
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Frequency Electronics beats Cytek Biosciences on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Frequency Electronics News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FEIM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FEIM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FEIM vs. The Competition

MetricFrequency ElectronicsINSTRU IndustryComputer SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$710.19M$3.17B$41.29B$12.54B
Dividend YieldN/A0.99%3.06%5.22%
P/E Ratio92.2177.46173.0224.18
Price / Sales9.753.78622.02112.26
Price / Cash27.0027.0653.0357.13
Price / Book12.034.2610.096.72
Net Income$23.69M$73.46M$1.06B$337.19M
7 Day Performance-2.76%0.97%3.81%0.48%
1 Month Performance20.22%12.35%10.98%5.07%
1 Year Performance270.83%81.71%170.16%34.25%

Frequency Electronics Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FEIM
Frequency Electronics
1.5488 of 5 stars
$69.16
-4.2%
$43.67
-36.9%
+295.2%$710.19M$69.81M92.21200
ALMR
Alamar Biosciences
4.5635 of 5 stars
$20.34
+1.4%
$30.00
+47.5%
N/A$1.41B$87.16MN/A222
ALNT
Allient
4.1951 of 5 stars
$70.26
+10.9%
$77.33
+10.1%
+181.5%$1.19B$554.48M49.132,478
EYPT
Eyepoint Pharmaceuticals
3.5056 of 5 stars
$12.80
-1.0%
$31.80
+148.4%
+68.9%$1.07B$31.37MN/A120
TRNS
Transcat
3.9266 of 5 stars
$74.60
+2.2%
$105.33
+41.2%
+6.0%$696.02M$278.42M87.761,245

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:FEIM) was last updated on 6/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners