Go Pro

Frequency Electronics (FEIM) Competitors

Frequency Electronics logo
$85.96 -2.42 (-2.74%)
As of 02:35 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

FEIM vs. ARLO, NSSC, AEVA, DAKT, and EVLV

Should you buy Frequency Electronics stock or one of its competitors? Frequency Electronics's main competitors and comparable companies include Arlo Technologies (ARLO), NAPCO Security Technologies (NSSC), Aeva Technologies (AEVA), Daktronics (DAKT), and Evolv Technologies (EVLV). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "electronic equipment & instruments" industry.

How does Frequency Electronics compare to Arlo Technologies?

Frequency Electronics (NASDAQ:FEIM) and Arlo Technologies (NYSE:ARLO) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, risk, profitability, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Arlo Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Frequency Electronics. Arlo Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Frequency Electronics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Frequency Electronics$63.23M15.20-$900K$0.25343.84
Arlo Technologies$529.30M2.79$14.93M$0.2750.39

Frequency Electronics has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Arlo Technologies has a beta of 1.54, meaning that its stock price is 54% more volatile than the broader market.

Frequency Electronics currently has a consensus target price of $43.67, indicating a potential downside of 49.20%. Arlo Technologies has a consensus target price of $20.60, indicating a potential upside of 51.41%. Given Arlo Technologies' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Arlo Technologies is more favorable than Frequency Electronics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Frequency Electronics
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Arlo Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71

58.6% of Frequency Electronics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.2% of Arlo Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.3% of Frequency Electronics shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Arlo Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Frequency Electronics had 14 more articles in the media than Arlo Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Frequency Electronics and 2 mentions for Arlo Technologies. Frequency Electronics' average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat Arlo Technologies' score of 0.00 indicating that Frequency Electronics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Frequency Electronics
5 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Arlo Technologies
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Arlo Technologies has a net margin of 5.20% compared to Frequency Electronics' net margin of 3.68%. Arlo Technologies' return on equity of 17.29% beat Frequency Electronics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Frequency Electronics3.68% 4.59% 2.90%
Arlo Technologies 5.20%17.29%7.12%

Summary

Arlo Technologies beats Frequency Electronics on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Frequency Electronics compare to NAPCO Security Technologies?

Frequency Electronics (NASDAQ:FEIM) and NAPCO Security Technologies (NASDAQ:NSSC) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment and risk.

NAPCO Security Technologies has a net margin of 21.27% compared to Frequency Electronics' net margin of 3.68%. NAPCO Security Technologies' return on equity of 31.41% beat Frequency Electronics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Frequency Electronics3.68% 4.59% 2.90%
NAPCO Security Technologies 21.27%31.41%26.06%

Frequency Electronics presently has a consensus target price of $43.67, suggesting a potential downside of 49.20%. NAPCO Security Technologies has a consensus target price of $50.40, suggesting a potential upside of 40.08%. Given NAPCO Security Technologies' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe NAPCO Security Technologies is more favorable than Frequency Electronics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Frequency Electronics
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
NAPCO Security Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

58.6% of Frequency Electronics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.1% of NAPCO Security Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.3% of Frequency Electronics shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.7% of NAPCO Security Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

NAPCO Security Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Frequency Electronics. NAPCO Security Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Frequency Electronics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Frequency Electronics$63.23M15.20-$900K$0.25343.84
NAPCO Security Technologies$202.32M6.36$43.03M$1.2129.73

In the previous week, Frequency Electronics had 11 more articles in the media than NAPCO Security Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Frequency Electronics and 5 mentions for NAPCO Security Technologies. NAPCO Security Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat Frequency Electronics' score of 0.64 indicating that NAPCO Security Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Frequency Electronics
5 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
NAPCO Security Technologies
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Frequency Electronics has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NAPCO Security Technologies has a beta of 1.43, meaning that its share price is 43% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

NAPCO Security Technologies beats Frequency Electronics on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Frequency Electronics compare to Aeva Technologies?

Frequency Electronics (NASDAQ:FEIM) and Aeva Technologies (NASDAQ:AEVA) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Frequency Electronics had 14 more articles in the media than Aeva Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Frequency Electronics and 2 mentions for Aeva Technologies. Aeva Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Frequency Electronics' score of 0.64 indicating that Aeva Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Frequency Electronics
5 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Aeva Technologies
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Frequency Electronics has a net margin of 3.68% compared to Aeva Technologies' net margin of -150.12%. Frequency Electronics' return on equity of 4.59% beat Aeva Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Frequency Electronics3.68% 4.59% 2.90%
Aeva Technologies -150.12%-859.37%-81.68%

Frequency Electronics currently has a consensus target price of $43.67, indicating a potential downside of 49.20%. Aeva Technologies has a consensus target price of $28.75, indicating a potential upside of 95.18%. Given Aeva Technologies' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Aeva Technologies is more favorable than Frequency Electronics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Frequency Electronics
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Aeva Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.20

Frequency Electronics has higher revenue and earnings than Aeva Technologies. Aeva Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Frequency Electronics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Frequency Electronics$63.23M15.20-$900K$0.25343.84
Aeva Technologies$18.08M51.36-$145.43M-$2.73N/A

58.6% of Frequency Electronics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.9% of Aeva Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.3% of Frequency Electronics shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 36.7% of Aeva Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Frequency Electronics has a beta of 0.72, indicating that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aeva Technologies has a beta of 2.44, indicating that its share price is 144% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Frequency Electronics beats Aeva Technologies on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Frequency Electronics compare to Daktronics?

Frequency Electronics (NASDAQ:FEIM) and Daktronics (NASDAQ:DAKT) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation and risk.

Daktronics has higher revenue and earnings than Frequency Electronics. Daktronics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Frequency Electronics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Frequency Electronics$63.23M15.20-$900K$0.25343.84
Daktronics$838.71M1.03$45.38M$0.9818.33

In the previous week, Frequency Electronics had 14 more articles in the media than Daktronics. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Frequency Electronics and 2 mentions for Daktronics. Daktronics' average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Frequency Electronics' score of 0.64 indicating that Daktronics is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Frequency Electronics
5 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Daktronics
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Frequency Electronics has a beta of 0.72, suggesting that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Daktronics has a beta of 1.68, suggesting that its share price is 68% more volatile than the broader market.

Frequency Electronics presently has a consensus target price of $43.67, suggesting a potential downside of 49.20%. Daktronics has a consensus target price of $31.00, suggesting a potential upside of 72.55%. Given Daktronics' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Daktronics is more favorable than Frequency Electronics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Frequency Electronics
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Daktronics
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Daktronics has a net margin of 5.66% compared to Frequency Electronics' net margin of 3.68%. Daktronics' return on equity of 18.05% beat Frequency Electronics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Frequency Electronics3.68% 4.59% 2.90%
Daktronics 5.66%18.05%9.68%

58.6% of Frequency Electronics shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.7% of Daktronics shares are held by institutional investors. 17.3% of Frequency Electronics shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.6% of Daktronics shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Daktronics beats Frequency Electronics on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Frequency Electronics compare to Evolv Technologies?

Evolv Technologies (NASDAQ:EVLV) and Frequency Electronics (NASDAQ:FEIM) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and dividends.

Frequency Electronics has a net margin of 3.68% compared to Evolv Technologies' net margin of -3.05%. Frequency Electronics' return on equity of 4.59% beat Evolv Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Evolv Technologies-3.05% -4.53% -1.72%
Frequency Electronics 3.68%4.59%2.90%

Evolv Technologies currently has a consensus price target of $9.81, indicating a potential upside of 91.09%. Frequency Electronics has a consensus price target of $43.67, indicating a potential downside of 49.20%. Given Evolv Technologies' higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Evolv Technologies is more favorable than Frequency Electronics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Evolv Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Frequency Electronics
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Frequency Electronics has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Evolv Technologies. Evolv Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Frequency Electronics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Evolv Technologies$145.90M6.37-$33.14M-$0.03N/A
Frequency Electronics$63.23M15.20-$900K$0.25343.84

66.7% of Evolv Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.6% of Frequency Electronics shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.2% of Evolv Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 17.3% of Frequency Electronics shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Evolv Technologies has a beta of 1.8, suggesting that its stock price is 80% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Frequency Electronics has a beta of 0.72, suggesting that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Frequency Electronics had 5 more articles in the media than Evolv Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Frequency Electronics and 11 mentions for Evolv Technologies. Evolv Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat Frequency Electronics' score of 0.64 indicating that Evolv Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Evolv Technologies
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Frequency Electronics
5 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Frequency Electronics beats Evolv Technologies on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Frequency Electronics News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FEIM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FEIM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FEIM vs. The Competition

MetricFrequency ElectronicsElectronic Equipment, Instruments & Components IndustryTechnology SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$965.53M$8.56B$29.49B$13.06B
Dividend YieldN/A2.24%2.74%11.71%
P/E Ratio345.4525.3976.8825.51
Price / Sales15.2039.51590.5188.64
Price / Cash226.3331.4646.5934.96
Price / Book15.004.647.786.26
Net Income-$900K$202.77M$703.70M$358.19M
7 Day Performance41.68%-2.23%-1.44%-1.27%
1 Month Performance9.18%-7.67%-4.13%-2.53%
1 Year Performance216.84%810.67%179.08%8.81%

Frequency Electronics Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FEIM
Frequency Electronics
0.8735 of 5 stars
$85.96
-2.7%
$43.67
-49.2%
+225.8%$965.53M$63.23M345.45242
ARLO
Arlo Technologies
2.6414 of 5 stars
$12.49
-5.0%
$20.60
+64.9%
-24.5%$1.36B$529.30M46.24350
NSSC
NAPCO Security Technologies
4.7742 of 5 stars
$35.85
-1.1%
$50.40
+40.6%
-13.5%$1.28B$202.32M29.571,049
AEVA
Aeva Technologies
3.1176 of 5 stars
$14.86
-5.1%
$28.75
+93.5%
-3.2%$936.77M$18.08MN/A230
DAKT
Daktronics
4.5887 of 5 stars
$19.45
-0.4%
$29.00
+49.1%
-23.5%$935.72M$838.71M21.302,693

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:FEIM) was last updated on 9/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners