Allient (ALNT) Competitors

In the previous week, Enersys had 2 more articles in the media than Allient. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Enersys and 5 mentions for Allient. Enersys' average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat Allient's score of 0.20 indicating that Enersys is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Enersys has higher revenue and earnings than Allient. Enersys is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Allient, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

94.9% of Enersys shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.6% of Allient shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Enersys shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 15.0% of Allient shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Enersys presently has a consensus target price of $265.00, indicating a potential upside of 47.56%. Allient has a consensus target price of $84.00, indicating a potential downside of 22.67%. Given Enersys' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Enersys is more favorable than Allient.

Enersys has a net margin of 9.29% compared to Allient's net margin of 4.98%. Enersys' return on equity of 24.02% beat Allient's return on equity.

Enersys has a beta of 1.18, indicating that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Allient has a beta of 1.58, indicating that its stock price is 58% more volatile than the broader market.

Enersys pays an annual dividend of $1.15 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Allient pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Enersys pays out 12.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Allient pays out 9.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Enersys has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Enersys is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Sensata Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Allient pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Sensata Technologies pays out 80.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Allient pays out 9.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Sensata Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Allient. Allient is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sensata Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Sensata Technologies has a beta of 1.25, meaning that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Allient has a beta of 1.58, meaning that its stock price is 58% more volatile than the broader market.

Sensata Technologies presently has a consensus price target of $48.80, suggesting a potential upside of 15.71%. Allient has a consensus price target of $84.00, suggesting a potential downside of 22.67%. Given Sensata Technologies' higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Sensata Technologies is more favorable than Allient.

Allient has a net margin of 4.98% compared to Sensata Technologies' net margin of 2.37%. Sensata Technologies' return on equity of 18.68% beat Allient's return on equity.

99.4% of Sensata Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.6% of Allient shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Sensata Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.0% of Allient shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Sensata Technologies had 2 more articles in the media than Allient. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Sensata Technologies and 5 mentions for Allient. Allient's average media sentiment score of 0.20 beat Sensata Technologies' score of 0.13 indicating that Allient is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Allient presently has a consensus price target of $84.00, suggesting a potential downside of 22.67%. Atkore has a consensus price target of $143.33, suggesting a potential upside of 51.11%. Given Atkore's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Atkore is more favorable than Allient.

Allient has a beta of 1.58, suggesting that its stock price is 58% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Atkore has a beta of 1.69, suggesting that its stock price is 69% more volatile than the broader market.

Allient has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Atkore. Atkore is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Allient, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Allient has a net margin of 4.98% compared to Atkore's net margin of -5.55%. Allient's return on equity of 13.55% beat Atkore's return on equity.

Allient pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Atkore pays an annual dividend of $1.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Allient pays out 9.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Atkore pays out -27.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Atkore has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Atkore is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

61.6% of Allient shares are held by institutional investors. 15.0% of Allient shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Atkore shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Atkore had 2 more articles in the media than Allient. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Atkore and 5 mentions for Allient. Allient's average media sentiment score of 0.20 beat Atkore's score of 0.17 indicating that Allient is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Plug Power currently has a consensus price target of $3.59, indicating a potential upside of 107.37%. Allient has a consensus price target of $84.00, indicating a potential downside of 22.67%. Given Plug Power's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Plug Power is more favorable than Allient.

Plug Power has a beta of 2.28, indicating that its stock price is 128% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Allient has a beta of 1.58, indicating that its stock price is 58% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Plug Power had 10 more articles in the media than Allient. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Plug Power and 5 mentions for Allient. Plug Power's average media sentiment score of 0.58 beat Allient's score of 0.20 indicating that Plug Power is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Allient has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Plug Power. Plug Power is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Allient, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

43.5% of Plug Power shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.6% of Allient shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of Plug Power shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.0% of Allient shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Allient has a net margin of 4.98% compared to Plug Power's net margin of -220.59%. Allient's return on equity of 13.55% beat Plug Power's return on equity.