FlexShopper Competitors

FlexShopper (NASDAQ:FPAY) and United Rentals (NYSE:URI) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, risk, earnings and dividends.

Risk & Volatility

FlexShopper has a beta of 1.2, suggesting that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, United Rentals has a beta of 2.25, suggesting that its stock price is 125% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares FlexShopper and United Rentals' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

United Rentals has higher revenue and earnings than FlexShopper. FlexShopper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than United Rentals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares FlexShopper and United Rentals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for FlexShopper and United Rentals, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

FlexShopper presently has a consensus target price of $4.1667, indicating a potential upside of 49.34%. United Rentals has a consensus target price of $279.00, indicating a potential downside of 15.95%. Given FlexShopper's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe FlexShopper is more favorable than United Rentals.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

16.8% of FlexShopper shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.1% of United Rentals shares are held by institutional investors. 37.4% of FlexShopper shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of United Rentals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

United Rentals beats FlexShopper on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

FlexShopper (NASDAQ:FPAY) and AerCap (NYSE:AER) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, risk, earnings and dividends.

Risk & Volatility

FlexShopper has a beta of 1.2, suggesting that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, AerCap has a beta of 2.42, suggesting that its stock price is 142% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares FlexShopper and AerCap's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

AerCap has higher revenue and earnings than FlexShopper. FlexShopper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AerCap, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares FlexShopper and AerCap's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for FlexShopper and AerCap, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

FlexShopper presently has a consensus target price of $4.1667, indicating a potential upside of 49.34%. AerCap has a consensus target price of $69.00, indicating a potential upside of 20.78%. Given FlexShopper's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe FlexShopper is more favorable than AerCap.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

16.8% of FlexShopper shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.7% of AerCap shares are held by institutional investors. 37.4% of FlexShopper shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

AerCap beats FlexShopper on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

FlexShopper (NASDAQ:FPAY) and Air Lease (NYSE:AL) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, risk, earnings and dividends.

Risk & Volatility

FlexShopper has a beta of 1.2, suggesting that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Air Lease has a beta of 2.2, suggesting that its stock price is 120% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares FlexShopper and Air Lease's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Air Lease has higher revenue and earnings than FlexShopper. FlexShopper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Air Lease, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares FlexShopper and Air Lease's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for FlexShopper and Air Lease, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

FlexShopper presently has a consensus target price of $4.1667, indicating a potential upside of 49.34%. Air Lease has a consensus target price of $49.3333, indicating a potential upside of 8.16%. Given FlexShopper's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe FlexShopper is more favorable than Air Lease.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

16.8% of FlexShopper shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.8% of Air Lease shares are held by institutional investors. 37.4% of FlexShopper shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.9% of Air Lease shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Air Lease beats FlexShopper on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

FlexShopper (NASDAQ:FPAY) and Rent-A-Center (NASDAQ:RCII) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, risk, earnings and dividends.

Risk & Volatility

FlexShopper has a beta of 1.2, suggesting that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Rent-A-Center has a beta of 1.68, suggesting that its stock price is 68% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares FlexShopper and Rent-A-Center's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares FlexShopper and Rent-A-Center's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Rent-A-Center has higher revenue and earnings than FlexShopper. FlexShopper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Rent-A-Center, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for FlexShopper and Rent-A-Center, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

FlexShopper presently has a consensus target price of $4.1667, indicating a potential upside of 49.34%. Rent-A-Center has a consensus target price of $59.40, indicating a potential upside of 4.27%. Given FlexShopper's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe FlexShopper is more favorable than Rent-A-Center.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

16.8% of FlexShopper shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.9% of Rent-A-Center shares are held by institutional investors. 37.4% of FlexShopper shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Rent-A-Center shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Rent-A-Center beats FlexShopper on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

FlexShopper (NASDAQ:FPAY) and PROG (NYSE:PRG) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends and earnings.

Risk and Volatility

FlexShopper has a beta of 1.2, meaning that its share price is 20% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, PROG has a beta of 1.95, meaning that its share price is 95% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares FlexShopper and PROG's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares FlexShopper and PROG's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

PROG has higher revenue and earnings than FlexShopper. FlexShopper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PROG, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for FlexShopper and PROG, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

FlexShopper currently has a consensus price target of $4.1667, suggesting a potential upside of 49.34%. PROG has a consensus price target of $59.60, suggesting a potential upside of 8.66%. Given FlexShopper's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe FlexShopper is more favorable than PROG.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

16.8% of FlexShopper shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.5% of PROG shares are held by institutional investors. 37.4% of FlexShopper shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of PROG shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

PROG beats FlexShopper on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

FlexShopper (NASDAQ:FPAY) and Triton International (NYSE:TRTN) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends and earnings.

Risk and Volatility

FlexShopper has a beta of 1.2, meaning that its share price is 20% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Triton International has a beta of 1.85, meaning that its share price is 85% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares FlexShopper and Triton International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares FlexShopper and Triton International's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Triton International has higher revenue and earnings than FlexShopper. FlexShopper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Triton International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for FlexShopper and Triton International, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

FlexShopper currently has a consensus price target of $4.1667, suggesting a potential upside of 49.34%. Triton International has a consensus price target of $58.00, suggesting a potential upside of 9.89%. Given FlexShopper's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe FlexShopper is more favorable than Triton International.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

16.8% of FlexShopper shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.2% of Triton International shares are held by institutional investors. 37.4% of FlexShopper shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Triton International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Triton International beats FlexShopper on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.