Skip to main content
NASDAQ:FPAY

FlexShopper Competitors

$2.79
+0.07 (+2.57 %)
(As of 05/18/2021 03:59 PM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$2.79
$2.88
50-Day Range
$2.16
$2.75
52-Week Range
$1.25
$3.95
Volume813 shs
Average Volume215,759 shs
Market Capitalization$59.65 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta1.2

Competitors

FlexShopper (NASDAQ:FPAY) Vs. URI, AER, AL, RCII, PRG, and TRTN

Should you be buying FPAY stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "equipment rental & leasing, not elsewhere classified" are considered alternatives and competitors to FlexShopper, including United Rentals (URI), AerCap (AER), Air Lease (AL), Rent-A-Center (RCII), PROG (PRG), and Triton International (TRTN).

FlexShopper (NASDAQ:FPAY) and United Rentals (NYSE:URI) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, risk, earnings and dividends.

Risk & Volatility

FlexShopper has a beta of 1.2, suggesting that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, United Rentals has a beta of 2.25, suggesting that its stock price is 125% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares FlexShopper and United Rentals' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FlexShopper$88.79 million0.67$580,000.00($0.11)-25.36
United Rentals$9.35 billion2.56$1.17 billion$19.5216.96

United Rentals has higher revenue and earnings than FlexShopper. FlexShopper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than United Rentals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares FlexShopper and United Rentals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
FlexShopper-0.96%-1.40%-1.81%
United Rentals10.69%34.19%7.21%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for FlexShopper and United Rentals, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
FlexShopper01202.67
United Rentals281002.40

FlexShopper presently has a consensus target price of $4.1667, indicating a potential upside of 49.34%. United Rentals has a consensus target price of $279.00, indicating a potential downside of 15.95%. Given FlexShopper's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe FlexShopper is more favorable than United Rentals.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

16.8% of FlexShopper shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.1% of United Rentals shares are held by institutional investors. 37.4% of FlexShopper shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of United Rentals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

United Rentals beats FlexShopper on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

FlexShopper (NASDAQ:FPAY) and AerCap (NYSE:AER) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, risk, earnings and dividends.

Risk & Volatility

FlexShopper has a beta of 1.2, suggesting that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, AerCap has a beta of 2.42, suggesting that its stock price is 142% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares FlexShopper and AerCap's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FlexShopper$88.79 million0.67$580,000.00($0.11)-25.36
AerCap$4.94 billion1.49$1.15 billion$8.436.70

AerCap has higher revenue and earnings than FlexShopper. FlexShopper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AerCap, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares FlexShopper and AerCap's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
FlexShopper-0.96%-1.40%-1.81%
AerCap-0.37%10.59%2.20%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for FlexShopper and AerCap, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
FlexShopper01202.67
AerCap00603.00

FlexShopper presently has a consensus target price of $4.1667, indicating a potential upside of 49.34%. AerCap has a consensus target price of $69.00, indicating a potential upside of 20.78%. Given FlexShopper's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe FlexShopper is more favorable than AerCap.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

16.8% of FlexShopper shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.7% of AerCap shares are held by institutional investors. 37.4% of FlexShopper shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

AerCap beats FlexShopper on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

FlexShopper (NASDAQ:FPAY) and Air Lease (NYSE:AL) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, risk, earnings and dividends.

Risk & Volatility

FlexShopper has a beta of 1.2, suggesting that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Air Lease has a beta of 2.2, suggesting that its stock price is 120% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares FlexShopper and Air Lease's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FlexShopper$88.79 million0.67$580,000.00($0.11)-25.36
Air Lease$2.02 billion2.58$587.12 million$5.098.96

Air Lease has higher revenue and earnings than FlexShopper. FlexShopper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Air Lease, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares FlexShopper and Air Lease's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
FlexShopper-0.96%-1.40%-1.81%
Air Lease27.48%9.83%2.51%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for FlexShopper and Air Lease, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
FlexShopper01202.67
Air Lease00303.00

FlexShopper presently has a consensus target price of $4.1667, indicating a potential upside of 49.34%. Air Lease has a consensus target price of $49.3333, indicating a potential upside of 8.16%. Given FlexShopper's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe FlexShopper is more favorable than Air Lease.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

16.8% of FlexShopper shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.8% of Air Lease shares are held by institutional investors. 37.4% of FlexShopper shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.9% of Air Lease shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Air Lease beats FlexShopper on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

FlexShopper (NASDAQ:FPAY) and Rent-A-Center (NASDAQ:RCII) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, risk, earnings and dividends.

Risk & Volatility

FlexShopper has a beta of 1.2, suggesting that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Rent-A-Center has a beta of 1.68, suggesting that its stock price is 68% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares FlexShopper and Rent-A-Center's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
FlexShopper-0.96%-1.40%-1.81%
Rent-A-Center6.95%35.08%10.71%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares FlexShopper and Rent-A-Center's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FlexShopper$88.79 million0.67$580,000.00($0.11)-25.36
Rent-A-Center$2.67 billion1.41$173.55 million$2.2425.43

Rent-A-Center has higher revenue and earnings than FlexShopper. FlexShopper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Rent-A-Center, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for FlexShopper and Rent-A-Center, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
FlexShopper01202.67
Rent-A-Center01413.00

FlexShopper presently has a consensus target price of $4.1667, indicating a potential upside of 49.34%. Rent-A-Center has a consensus target price of $59.40, indicating a potential upside of 4.27%. Given FlexShopper's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe FlexShopper is more favorable than Rent-A-Center.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

16.8% of FlexShopper shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.9% of Rent-A-Center shares are held by institutional investors. 37.4% of FlexShopper shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Rent-A-Center shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Rent-A-Center beats FlexShopper on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

FlexShopper (NASDAQ:FPAY) and PROG (NYSE:PRG) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends and earnings.

Risk and Volatility

FlexShopper has a beta of 1.2, meaning that its share price is 20% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, PROG has a beta of 1.95, meaning that its share price is 95% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares FlexShopper and PROG's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
FlexShopper-0.96%-1.40%-1.81%
PROG-5.00%21.39%11.26%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares FlexShopper and PROG's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FlexShopper$88.79 million0.67$580,000.00($0.11)-25.36
PROG$3.95 billion0.93$31.47 million$3.8913.95

PROG has higher revenue and earnings than FlexShopper. FlexShopper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PROG, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for FlexShopper and PROG, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
FlexShopper01202.67
PROG01602.86

FlexShopper currently has a consensus price target of $4.1667, suggesting a potential upside of 49.34%. PROG has a consensus price target of $59.60, suggesting a potential upside of 8.66%. Given FlexShopper's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe FlexShopper is more favorable than PROG.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

16.8% of FlexShopper shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.5% of PROG shares are held by institutional investors. 37.4% of FlexShopper shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of PROG shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

PROG beats FlexShopper on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

FlexShopper (NASDAQ:FPAY) and Triton International (NYSE:TRTN) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends and earnings.

Risk and Volatility

FlexShopper has a beta of 1.2, meaning that its share price is 20% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Triton International has a beta of 1.85, meaning that its share price is 85% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares FlexShopper and Triton International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
FlexShopper-0.96%-1.40%-1.81%
Triton International22.11%15.93%3.30%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares FlexShopper and Triton International's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FlexShopper$88.79 million0.67$580,000.00($0.11)-25.36
Triton International$1.35 billion2.64$352.69 million$4.5711.55

Triton International has higher revenue and earnings than FlexShopper. FlexShopper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Triton International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for FlexShopper and Triton International, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
FlexShopper01202.67
Triton International00303.00

FlexShopper currently has a consensus price target of $4.1667, suggesting a potential upside of 49.34%. Triton International has a consensus price target of $58.00, suggesting a potential upside of 9.89%. Given FlexShopper's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe FlexShopper is more favorable than Triton International.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

16.8% of FlexShopper shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.2% of Triton International shares are held by institutional investors. 37.4% of FlexShopper shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Triton International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Triton International beats FlexShopper on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.


FlexShopper Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
United Rentals logo
URI
United Rentals
1.5$331.01+3.0%$24.68 billion$9.35 billion26.23
AerCap logo
AER
AerCap
1.8$56.50+2.7%$7.56 billion$4.94 billion-217.31
Air Lease logo
AL
Air Lease
2.4$45.61+1.4%$5.28 billion$2.02 billion9.37
Rent-A-Center logo
RCII
Rent-A-Center
2.1$56.97+0.7%$3.75 billion$2.67 billion16.51
PROG logo
PRG
PROG
2.1$54.28+1.2%$3.70 billion$3.95 billion-17.07News Coverage
Triton International logo
TRTN
Triton International
2.6$52.78+2.3%$3.64 billion$1.35 billion14.91
McGrath RentCorp logo
MGRC
McGrath RentCorp
2.0$84.26+0.9%$2.06 billion$570.23 million21.33
Textainer Group logo
TGH
Textainer Group
1.2$27.72+2.5%$1.44 billion$619.76 million26.65Earnings Announcement
Analyst Upgrade
The Aaron's logo
AAN
The Aaron's
1.8$32.43+0.9%$1.12 billion$1.78 billion16.38
CAI International logo
CAI
CAI International
1.9$41.97+2.8%$746.67 million$416.54 million42.39News Coverage
General Finance logo
GFN
General Finance
1.1$18.97+0.1%$573.37 million$356.48 million316.17
Exterran logo
EXTN
Exterran
2.1$5.12+0.2%$170.76 million$1.32 billion-1.14
Quest Resource logo
QRHC
Quest Resource
1.8$4.00+12.8%$64.26 million$98.98 million100.03Earnings Announcement
News Coverage
Gap Up
This page was last updated on 5/18/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more about MarketBeat.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.