Free Trial

Great Elm Capital Group (GECC) Competitors

Great Elm Capital Group logo
$6.08 -0.12 (-1.94%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$6.15 +0.07 (+1.15%)
As of 05:46 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

GECC vs. MXF, NCA, DSM, KF, and TDF

Should you buy Great Elm Capital Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Great Elm Capital Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Great Elm Capital Group include Mexico Fund (MXF), Nuveen California Municipal Va (NCA), BNY Mellon Strategic Municipal Bond Fund (DSM), The Korea Fund (KF), and Templeton Dragon Fund (TDF). These companies are all part of the "financial services" industry.

How does Great Elm Capital Group compare to Mexico Fund?

Mexico Fund (NYSE:MXF) and Great Elm Capital Group (NASDAQ:GECC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

38.8% of Great Elm Capital Group shares are held by institutional investors. 2.7% of Mexico Fund shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of Great Elm Capital Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Mexico Fund has a beta of 0.82, meaning that its share price is 18% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Great Elm Capital Group has a beta of 0.75, meaning that its share price is 25% less volatile than the broader market.

Mexico Fund has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Great Elm Capital Group's net margin of -70.13%. Great Elm Capital Group's return on equity of 14.16% beat Mexico Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mexico FundN/A N/A N/A
Great Elm Capital Group -70.13%14.16%4.88%

Mexico Fund has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Great Elm Capital Group.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mexico FundN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Great Elm Capital Group$49.99M1.69-$31.79M-$2.39N/A

In the previous week, Mexico Fund had 9 more articles in the media than Great Elm Capital Group. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Mexico Fund and 1 mentions for Great Elm Capital Group. Mexico Fund's average media sentiment score of 1.51 beat Great Elm Capital Group's score of 1.23 indicating that Mexico Fund is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Mexico Fund Very Positive
Great Elm Capital Group Positive

Great Elm Capital Group has a consensus price target of $10.50, indicating a potential upside of 72.70%. Given Great Elm Capital Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Great Elm Capital Group is more favorable than Mexico Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Mexico Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Great Elm Capital Group
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75

Mexico Fund pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.4%. Great Elm Capital Group pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 19.7%. Great Elm Capital Group pays out -50.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Great Elm Capital Group has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Great Elm Capital Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Great Elm Capital Group beats Mexico Fund on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Great Elm Capital Group compare to Nuveen California Municipal Va?

Nuveen California Municipal Va (NYSE:NCA) and Great Elm Capital Group (NASDAQ:GECC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment and dividends.

Nuveen California Municipal Va has a beta of 0.38, indicating that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Great Elm Capital Group has a beta of 0.75, indicating that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market.

Nuveen California Municipal Va has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Great Elm Capital Group's net margin of -70.13%. Great Elm Capital Group's return on equity of 14.16% beat Nuveen California Municipal Va's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Nuveen California Municipal VaN/A N/A N/A
Great Elm Capital Group -70.13%14.16%4.88%

In the previous week, Nuveen California Municipal Va had 1 more articles in the media than Great Elm Capital Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Nuveen California Municipal Va and 1 mentions for Great Elm Capital Group. Great Elm Capital Group's average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat Nuveen California Municipal Va's score of 0.91 indicating that Great Elm Capital Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Nuveen California Municipal Va Positive
Great Elm Capital Group Positive

Nuveen California Municipal Va has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Great Elm Capital Group.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nuveen California Municipal VaN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Great Elm Capital Group$49.99M1.69-$31.79M-$2.39N/A

Nuveen California Municipal Va pays an annual dividend of $0.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Great Elm Capital Group pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 19.7%. Great Elm Capital Group pays out -50.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Great Elm Capital Group has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Great Elm Capital Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

21.5% of Nuveen California Municipal Va shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.8% of Great Elm Capital Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Nuveen California Municipal Va shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of Great Elm Capital Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Great Elm Capital Group has a consensus target price of $10.50, indicating a potential upside of 72.70%. Given Great Elm Capital Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Great Elm Capital Group is more favorable than Nuveen California Municipal Va.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Nuveen California Municipal Va
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Great Elm Capital Group
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75

Summary

Great Elm Capital Group beats Nuveen California Municipal Va on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Great Elm Capital Group compare to BNY Mellon Strategic Municipal Bond Fund?

BNY Mellon Strategic Municipal Bond Fund (NYSE:DSM) and Great Elm Capital Group (NASDAQ:GECC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk and dividends.

38.8% of Great Elm Capital Group shares are held by institutional investors. 3.9% of Great Elm Capital Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Great Elm Capital Group has a consensus target price of $10.50, indicating a potential upside of 72.70%. Given Great Elm Capital Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Great Elm Capital Group is more favorable than BNY Mellon Strategic Municipal Bond Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
BNY Mellon Strategic Municipal Bond Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Great Elm Capital Group
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75

BNY Mellon Strategic Municipal Bond Fund has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Great Elm Capital Group.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BNY Mellon Strategic Municipal Bond Fund-$4.57M-65.93N/AN/AN/A
Great Elm Capital Group$49.99M1.69-$31.79M-$2.39N/A

BNY Mellon Strategic Municipal Bond Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Great Elm Capital Group pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 19.7%. Great Elm Capital Group pays out -50.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Great Elm Capital Group has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Great Elm Capital Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

BNY Mellon Strategic Municipal Bond Fund has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Great Elm Capital Group's net margin of -70.13%. Great Elm Capital Group's return on equity of 14.16% beat BNY Mellon Strategic Municipal Bond Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BNY Mellon Strategic Municipal Bond FundN/A N/A N/A
Great Elm Capital Group -70.13%14.16%4.88%

In the previous week, BNY Mellon Strategic Municipal Bond Fund and BNY Mellon Strategic Municipal Bond Fund both had 1 articles in the media. Great Elm Capital Group's average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat BNY Mellon Strategic Municipal Bond Fund's score of 0.50 indicating that Great Elm Capital Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
BNY Mellon Strategic Municipal Bond Fund Positive
Great Elm Capital Group Positive

BNY Mellon Strategic Municipal Bond Fund has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Great Elm Capital Group has a beta of 0.75, meaning that its share price is 25% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Great Elm Capital Group beats BNY Mellon Strategic Municipal Bond Fund on 13 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Great Elm Capital Group compare to The Korea Fund?

Great Elm Capital Group (NASDAQ:GECC) and The Korea Fund (NYSE:KF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, earnings, dividends and profitability.

The Korea Fund has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Great Elm Capital Group.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Great Elm Capital Group$49.99M1.69-$31.79M-$2.39N/A
The Korea FundN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

38.8% of Great Elm Capital Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.0% of The Korea Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.9% of Great Elm Capital Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 59.5% of The Korea Fund shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Great Elm Capital Group pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 19.7%. The Korea Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Great Elm Capital Group pays out -50.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Great Elm Capital Group has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Great Elm Capital Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

The Korea Fund has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Great Elm Capital Group's net margin of -70.13%. Great Elm Capital Group's return on equity of 14.16% beat The Korea Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Great Elm Capital Group-70.13% 14.16% 4.88%
The Korea Fund N/A N/A N/A

Great Elm Capital Group currently has a consensus price target of $10.50, indicating a potential upside of 72.70%. Given Great Elm Capital Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Great Elm Capital Group is more favorable than The Korea Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Great Elm Capital Group
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75
The Korea Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Great Elm Capital Group and Great Elm Capital Group both had 1 articles in the media. Great Elm Capital Group's average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat The Korea Fund's score of 1.00 indicating that Great Elm Capital Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Great Elm Capital Group Positive
The Korea Fund Positive

Great Elm Capital Group has a beta of 0.75, suggesting that its share price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, The Korea Fund has a beta of 1.55, suggesting that its share price is 55% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Great Elm Capital Group beats The Korea Fund on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Great Elm Capital Group compare to Templeton Dragon Fund?

Great Elm Capital Group (NASDAQ:GECC) and Templeton Dragon Fund (NYSE:TDF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings and institutional ownership.

Great Elm Capital Group pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 19.7%. Templeton Dragon Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Great Elm Capital Group pays out -50.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Great Elm Capital Group has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Great Elm Capital Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Great Elm Capital Group has a beta of 0.75, indicating that its share price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Templeton Dragon Fund has a beta of 0.4, indicating that its share price is 60% less volatile than the broader market.

Templeton Dragon Fund has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Great Elm Capital Group's net margin of -70.13%. Great Elm Capital Group's return on equity of 14.16% beat Templeton Dragon Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Great Elm Capital Group-70.13% 14.16% 4.88%
Templeton Dragon Fund N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Great Elm Capital Group had 1 more articles in the media than Templeton Dragon Fund. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Great Elm Capital Group and 0 mentions for Templeton Dragon Fund. Great Elm Capital Group's average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat Templeton Dragon Fund's score of 0.00 indicating that Great Elm Capital Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Great Elm Capital Group Positive
Templeton Dragon Fund Neutral

Great Elm Capital Group currently has a consensus price target of $10.50, suggesting a potential upside of 72.70%. Given Great Elm Capital Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Great Elm Capital Group is more favorable than Templeton Dragon Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Great Elm Capital Group
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75
Templeton Dragon Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

38.8% of Great Elm Capital Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.2% of Templeton Dragon Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.9% of Great Elm Capital Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Templeton Dragon Fund has higher revenue and earnings than Great Elm Capital Group.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Great Elm Capital Group$49.99M1.69-$31.79M-$2.39N/A
Templeton Dragon Fund$77.35M3.66N/AN/AN/A

Summary

Great Elm Capital Group beats Templeton Dragon Fund on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Great Elm Capital Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GECC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GECC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GECC vs. The Competition

MetricGreat Elm Capital GroupFIN IndustryFinance SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$84.45M$11.69B$13.40B$12.42B
Dividend Yield18.46%7.12%5.78%5.29%
P/E Ratio-2.5421.3319.6924.19
Price / Sales1.694.46138.00138.36
Price / Cash1.5012.9919.9357.88
Price / Book0.753.062.176.72
Net Income-$31.79M$553.89M$1.13B$337.19M
7 Day Performance1.33%-0.87%-0.69%0.48%
1 Month Performance9.35%-1.93%-0.44%5.07%
1 Year Performance-42.48%6.68%11.16%34.25%

Great Elm Capital Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GECC
Great Elm Capital Group
2.7458 of 5 stars
$6.08
-1.9%
$10.50
+72.7%
-41.4%$84.45M$49.99MN/AN/A
MXF
Mexico Fund
N/A$22.00
+1.4%
N/A+31.5%$317.24M$77.16MN/AN/A
NCA
Nuveen California Municipal Va
N/A$9.38
+1.1%
N/A+9.5%$310.59M$11.40MN/AN/A
DSM
BNY Mellon Strategic Municipal Bond Fund
N/A$6.08
+1.3%
N/A+10.5%$300.53MN/AN/A20,786
KF
The Korea Fund
N/A$71.61
+8.4%
N/A+240.8%$297.90MN/AN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:GECC) was last updated on 6/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners