Go Pro
→ Your money is changing (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free GECC Stock Alerts

Great Elm Capital Group (GECC) Competitors

Great Elm Capital Group logo
$5.46 +0.13 (+2.44%)
Closing price 07/15/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$5.34 -0.13 (-2.29%)
As of 07/15/2026 07:18 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.
Compare

GECC vs. KF, MIN, TDF, MMT, and MFM

Should you buy Great Elm Capital Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Great Elm Capital Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Great Elm Capital Group include The Korea Fund (KF), MFS Intermediate Income Trust (MIN), Templeton Dragon Fund (TDF), MFS Multimarket Income Trust (MMT), and Mfs Muni Inc Tr (MFM). These companies are all part of the "financial services" industry.

How does Great Elm Capital Group compare to The Korea Fund?

Great Elm Capital Group (NASDAQ:GECC) and The Korea Fund (NYSE:KF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

In the previous week, The Korea Fund had 1 more articles in the media than Great Elm Capital Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for The Korea Fund and 1 mentions for Great Elm Capital Group. The Korea Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.47 beat Great Elm Capital Group's score of -0.04 indicating that The Korea Fund is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Great Elm Capital Group Neutral
The Korea Fund Neutral

38.8% of Great Elm Capital Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.0% of The Korea Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.9% of Great Elm Capital Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 59.5% of The Korea Fund shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Great Elm Capital Group currently has a consensus price target of $10.50, indicating a potential upside of 92.31%. Given Great Elm Capital Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Great Elm Capital Group is more favorable than The Korea Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Great Elm Capital Group
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75
The Korea Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

The Korea Fund has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Great Elm Capital Group's net margin of -70.13%. Great Elm Capital Group's return on equity of 14.16% beat The Korea Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Great Elm Capital Group-70.13% 14.16% 4.88%
The Korea Fund N/A N/A N/A

Great Elm Capital Group has a beta of 0.76, indicating that its share price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, The Korea Fund has a beta of 1.55, indicating that its share price is 55% more volatile than the broader market.

The Korea Fund has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Great Elm Capital Group.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Great Elm Capital Group$49.99M1.52-$31.79M-$2.39N/A
The Korea FundN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Great Elm Capital Group pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 18.3%. The Korea Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Great Elm Capital Group pays out -41.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Great Elm Capital Group has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Great Elm Capital Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Great Elm Capital Group beats The Korea Fund on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Great Elm Capital Group compare to MFS Intermediate Income Trust?

Great Elm Capital Group (NASDAQ:GECC) and MFS Intermediate Income Trust (NYSE:MIN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment and valuation.

In the previous week, Great Elm Capital Group and Great Elm Capital Group both had 1 articles in the media. MFS Intermediate Income Trust's average media sentiment score of 2.00 beat Great Elm Capital Group's score of -0.04 indicating that MFS Intermediate Income Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Great Elm Capital Group Neutral
MFS Intermediate Income Trust Very Positive

Great Elm Capital Group presently has a consensus price target of $10.50, indicating a potential upside of 92.31%. Given Great Elm Capital Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Great Elm Capital Group is more favorable than MFS Intermediate Income Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Great Elm Capital Group
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75
MFS Intermediate Income Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Great Elm Capital Group has a beta of 0.76, indicating that its share price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MFS Intermediate Income Trust has a beta of 0.27, indicating that its share price is 73% less volatile than the broader market.

MFS Intermediate Income Trust has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Great Elm Capital Group.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Great Elm Capital Group$49.99M1.52-$31.79M-$2.39N/A
MFS Intermediate Income TrustN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

38.8% of Great Elm Capital Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.9% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 3.9% of Great Elm Capital Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Great Elm Capital Group pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 18.3%. MFS Intermediate Income Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.4%. Great Elm Capital Group pays out -41.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Great Elm Capital Group has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Great Elm Capital Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

MFS Intermediate Income Trust has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Great Elm Capital Group's net margin of -70.13%. Great Elm Capital Group's return on equity of 14.16% beat MFS Intermediate Income Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Great Elm Capital Group-70.13% 14.16% 4.88%
MFS Intermediate Income Trust N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Great Elm Capital Group beats MFS Intermediate Income Trust on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Great Elm Capital Group compare to Templeton Dragon Fund?

Great Elm Capital Group (NASDAQ:GECC) and Templeton Dragon Fund (NYSE:TDF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

38.8% of Great Elm Capital Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.2% of Templeton Dragon Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 3.9% of Great Elm Capital Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Templeton Dragon Fund has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Great Elm Capital Group's net margin of -70.13%. Great Elm Capital Group's return on equity of 14.16% beat Templeton Dragon Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Great Elm Capital Group-70.13% 14.16% 4.88%
Templeton Dragon Fund N/A N/A N/A

Great Elm Capital Group pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 18.3%. Templeton Dragon Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.45 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Great Elm Capital Group pays out -41.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Great Elm Capital Group has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Great Elm Capital Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Great Elm Capital Group currently has a consensus price target of $10.50, suggesting a potential upside of 92.31%. Given Great Elm Capital Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Great Elm Capital Group is more favorable than Templeton Dragon Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Great Elm Capital Group
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75
Templeton Dragon Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Great Elm Capital Group and Great Elm Capital Group both had 1 articles in the media. Templeton Dragon Fund's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Great Elm Capital Group's score of -0.04 indicating that Templeton Dragon Fund is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Great Elm Capital Group Neutral
Templeton Dragon Fund Positive

Great Elm Capital Group has a beta of 0.76, meaning that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Templeton Dragon Fund has a beta of 0.4, meaning that its stock price is 60% less volatile than the broader market.

Templeton Dragon Fund has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Great Elm Capital Group.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Great Elm Capital Group$49.99M1.52-$31.79M-$2.39N/A
Templeton Dragon FundN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Summary

Great Elm Capital Group beats Templeton Dragon Fund on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Great Elm Capital Group compare to MFS Multimarket Income Trust?

Great Elm Capital Group (NASDAQ:GECC) and MFS Multimarket Income Trust (NYSE:MMT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and risk.

MFS Multimarket Income Trust has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Great Elm Capital Group.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Great Elm Capital Group$49.99M1.52-$31.79M-$2.39N/A
MFS Multimarket Income TrustN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Great Elm Capital Group pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 18.3%. MFS Multimarket Income Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.0%. Great Elm Capital Group pays out -41.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Great Elm Capital Group has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Great Elm Capital Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

MFS Multimarket Income Trust has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Great Elm Capital Group's net margin of -70.13%. Great Elm Capital Group's return on equity of 14.16% beat MFS Multimarket Income Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Great Elm Capital Group-70.13% 14.16% 4.88%
MFS Multimarket Income Trust N/A N/A N/A

Great Elm Capital Group has a beta of 0.76, indicating that its share price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MFS Multimarket Income Trust has a beta of 0.53, indicating that its share price is 47% less volatile than the broader market.

Great Elm Capital Group currently has a consensus target price of $10.50, indicating a potential upside of 92.31%. Given Great Elm Capital Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Great Elm Capital Group is more favorable than MFS Multimarket Income Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Great Elm Capital Group
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75
MFS Multimarket Income Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, MFS Multimarket Income Trust had 4 more articles in the media than Great Elm Capital Group. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for MFS Multimarket Income Trust and 1 mentions for Great Elm Capital Group. MFS Multimarket Income Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.30 beat Great Elm Capital Group's score of -0.04 indicating that MFS Multimarket Income Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Great Elm Capital Group Neutral
MFS Multimarket Income Trust Positive

38.8% of Great Elm Capital Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.0% of MFS Multimarket Income Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 3.9% of Great Elm Capital Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Great Elm Capital Group beats MFS Multimarket Income Trust on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Great Elm Capital Group compare to Mfs Muni Inc Tr?

Mfs Muni Inc Tr (NYSE:MFM) and Great Elm Capital Group (NASDAQ:GECC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends and valuation.

Mfs Muni Inc Tr has a beta of 0.67, meaning that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Great Elm Capital Group has a beta of 0.76, meaning that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Mfs Muni Inc Tr had 3 more articles in the media than Great Elm Capital Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Mfs Muni Inc Tr and 1 mentions for Great Elm Capital Group. Mfs Muni Inc Tr's average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat Great Elm Capital Group's score of -0.04 indicating that Mfs Muni Inc Tr is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Mfs Muni Inc Tr Positive
Great Elm Capital Group Neutral

Great Elm Capital Group has a consensus target price of $10.50, suggesting a potential upside of 92.31%. Given Great Elm Capital Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Great Elm Capital Group is more favorable than Mfs Muni Inc Tr.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Mfs Muni Inc Tr
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Great Elm Capital Group
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75

38.8% of Great Elm Capital Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Mfs Muni Inc Tr shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of Great Elm Capital Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Mfs Muni Inc Tr has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Great Elm Capital Group's net margin of -70.13%. Great Elm Capital Group's return on equity of 14.16% beat Mfs Muni Inc Tr's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mfs Muni Inc TrN/A N/A N/A
Great Elm Capital Group -70.13%14.16%4.88%

Mfs Muni Inc Tr has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Great Elm Capital Group.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mfs Muni Inc TrN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Great Elm Capital Group$49.99M1.52-$31.79M-$2.39N/A

Summary

Great Elm Capital Group beats Mfs Muni Inc Tr on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Great Elm Capital Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GECC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GECC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GECC vs. The Competition

Export
MetricGreat Elm Capital GroupFIN IndustryFinance SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$74.04M$12.41B$14.37B$12.56B
Dividend Yield18.76%7.30%5.69%9.45%
P/E Ratio-2.2822.5820.6524.35
Price / Sales1.524.3845.6076.04
Price / Cash1.2313.1319.2560.00
Price / Book0.683.382.276.31
Net Income-$31.79M$553.89M$1.13B$331.55M
7 Day Performance3.61%1.77%0.53%-0.71%
1 Month Performance-1.27%0.74%1.15%0.16%
1 Year Performance-50.36%2.04%13.58%19.66%

Great Elm Capital Group Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GECC
Great Elm Capital Group
3.1309 of 5 stars		$5.46
+2.4%		$10.50
+92.3%		-50.1%$74.04M$49.99MN/AN/A
KF
The Korea Fund
N/A$68.08
-4.9%		N/A+128.5%$283.19MN/AN/AN/A
MIN
MFS Intermediate Income Trust
N/A$2.46
+0.2%		N/A-7.4%$279.38MN/AN/AN/A
TDF
Templeton Dragon Fund
N/A$10.71
-1.3%		N/A+7.3%$269.68MN/AN/A147,000
MMT
MFS Multimarket Income Trust
N/A$4.42
-0.1%		N/A-4.4%$242.47MN/AN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:GECC) was last updated on 7/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
The $15 Gold Fund That Pays Up to $1,152/Month
Gold is hitting record highs, but most investors are leaving income on the table. A $15 fund is quietly paying...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
URGENT Dollar Reset Warning for Monday
A 50-year U.S.-Saudi arrangement established under Henry Kissinger - one credited with anchoring the dollar in...
Golden Portfolio | Sponsoredtc pixel
What will Nvidia do next?
Wall Street spends millions on supercomputers and analyst teams to forecast stock prices. Now a new predictive...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting
You’re Being LIED To About The Iran War Forget EVERYTHING you’ve heard about the Iran war. Especially th...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
BlackRock just moved $150 billion into this "new internet"
BlackRock CEO Larry Fink's 2026 chairman's letter compared tokenization to the birth of the internet - and the...
Awesomely, LLC | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump’s $250 Bill – See Immediately
Former Goldman Sachs VP Dr. David Eifrig is warning that July 28 could trigger the biggest wealth reset in mod...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Jeff Brown and Marc Chaikin's latest AI prediction explained
Jeff Brown and Marc Chaikin - the duo who identified Nvidia a decade ago - are forecasting that Elon Musk's AI...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
The end may be near for these iconic stocks
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, says two forces - AI disruption and fracturing global trade - are ...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel