Go Pro
→ Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE (From Base Camp Trading) (Ad)tc pixel Free GECC Stock Alerts

Great Elm Capital Group (GECC) Competitors

Great Elm Capital Group logo
$5.29 +0.12 (+2.32%)
Closing price 08/4/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$5.32 +0.03 (+0.47%)
As of 04:00 AM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.
Compare

GECC vs. MIN, NSLR, TDF, MMT, and KF

Should you buy Great Elm Capital Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Great Elm Capital Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Great Elm Capital Group include MFS Intermediate Income Trust (MIN), Neostellar Capital (NSLR), Templeton Dragon Fund (TDF), MFS Multimarket Income Trust (MMT), and The Korea Fund (KF). These companies are all part of the "finance" sector.

How does Great Elm Capital Group compare to MFS Intermediate Income Trust?

MFS Intermediate Income Trust (NYSE:MIN) and Great Elm Capital Group (NASDAQ:GECC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and earnings.

MFS Intermediate Income Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.5%. Great Elm Capital Group pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 18.9%. Great Elm Capital Group pays out -41.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Great Elm Capital Group has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Great Elm Capital Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Great Elm Capital Group has a consensus target price of $10.50, suggesting a potential upside of 98.49%. Given Great Elm Capital Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Great Elm Capital Group is more favorable than MFS Intermediate Income Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
MFS Intermediate Income Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Great Elm Capital Group
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75

50.9% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.8% of Great Elm Capital Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of Great Elm Capital Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

MFS Intermediate Income Trust has a beta of 0.27, indicating that its stock price is 73% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Great Elm Capital Group has a beta of 0.77, indicating that its stock price is 23% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Great Elm Capital Group had 2 more articles in the media than MFS Intermediate Income Trust. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Great Elm Capital Group and 1 mentions for MFS Intermediate Income Trust. MFS Intermediate Income Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.96 beat Great Elm Capital Group's score of 0.44 indicating that MFS Intermediate Income Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
MFS Intermediate Income Trust
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Great Elm Capital Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

MFS Intermediate Income Trust has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Great Elm Capital Group's net margin of -70.13%. Great Elm Capital Group's return on equity of 14.16% beat MFS Intermediate Income Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MFS Intermediate Income TrustN/A N/A N/A
Great Elm Capital Group -70.13%14.16%4.88%

MFS Intermediate Income Trust has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Great Elm Capital Group.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MFS Intermediate Income TrustN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Great Elm Capital Group$49.99M1.47-$31.79M-$2.39N/A

Summary

Great Elm Capital Group beats MFS Intermediate Income Trust on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Great Elm Capital Group compare to Neostellar Capital?

Neostellar Capital (NASDAQ:NSLR) and Great Elm Capital Group (NASDAQ:GECC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, valuation, earnings, risk and institutional ownership.

13.0% of Neostellar Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.8% of Great Elm Capital Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.3% of Neostellar Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of Great Elm Capital Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Neostellar Capital presently has a consensus price target of $15.00, indicating a potential upside of 34.53%. Great Elm Capital Group has a consensus price target of $10.50, indicating a potential upside of 98.49%. Given Great Elm Capital Group's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Great Elm Capital Group is more favorable than Neostellar Capital.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Neostellar Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Great Elm Capital Group
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75

Neostellar Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Great Elm Capital Group pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 18.9%. Neostellar Capital pays out 3.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Great Elm Capital Group pays out -41.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Great Elm Capital Group has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Great Elm Capital Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Neostellar Capital has a beta of 1.44, suggesting that its share price is 44% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Great Elm Capital Group has a beta of 0.77, suggesting that its share price is 23% less volatile than the broader market.

Neostellar Capital has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Great Elm Capital Group. Great Elm Capital Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Neostellar Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Neostellar Capital$1.69M174.64$48.81M$6.981.60
Great Elm Capital Group$49.99M1.47-$31.79M-$2.39N/A

In the previous week, Great Elm Capital Group had 3 more articles in the media than Neostellar Capital. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Great Elm Capital Group and 0 mentions for Neostellar Capital. Great Elm Capital Group's average media sentiment score of 0.44 beat Neostellar Capital's score of 0.00 indicating that Great Elm Capital Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Neostellar Capital Neutral
Great Elm Capital Group Neutral

Neostellar Capital has a net margin of 10,695.73% compared to Great Elm Capital Group's net margin of -70.13%. Great Elm Capital Group's return on equity of 14.16% beat Neostellar Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Neostellar Capital10,695.73% -6.61% -5.13%
Great Elm Capital Group -70.13%14.16%4.88%

Summary

Great Elm Capital Group beats Neostellar Capital on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Great Elm Capital Group compare to Templeton Dragon Fund?

Great Elm Capital Group (NASDAQ:GECC) and Templeton Dragon Fund (NYSE:TDF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Great Elm Capital Group has a beta of 0.77, meaning that its share price is 23% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Templeton Dragon Fund has a beta of 0.41, meaning that its share price is 59% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Templeton Dragon Fund had 1 more articles in the media than Great Elm Capital Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Templeton Dragon Fund and 3 mentions for Great Elm Capital Group. Templeton Dragon Fund's average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat Great Elm Capital Group's score of 0.44 indicating that Templeton Dragon Fund is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Great Elm Capital Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Templeton Dragon Fund
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Templeton Dragon Fund has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Great Elm Capital Group's net margin of -70.13%. Great Elm Capital Group's return on equity of 14.16% beat Templeton Dragon Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Great Elm Capital Group-70.13% 14.16% 4.88%
Templeton Dragon Fund N/A N/A N/A

38.8% of Great Elm Capital Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.2% of Templeton Dragon Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 3.9% of Great Elm Capital Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Great Elm Capital Group currently has a consensus price target of $10.50, suggesting a potential upside of 98.49%. Given Great Elm Capital Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Great Elm Capital Group is more favorable than Templeton Dragon Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Great Elm Capital Group
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75
Templeton Dragon Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Templeton Dragon Fund has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Great Elm Capital Group.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Great Elm Capital Group$49.99M1.47-$31.79M-$2.39N/A
Templeton Dragon FundN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Great Elm Capital Group pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 18.9%. Templeton Dragon Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.45 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Great Elm Capital Group pays out -41.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Great Elm Capital Group has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Great Elm Capital Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Great Elm Capital Group beats Templeton Dragon Fund on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Great Elm Capital Group compare to MFS Multimarket Income Trust?

Great Elm Capital Group (NASDAQ:GECC) and MFS Multimarket Income Trust (NYSE:MMT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings and profitability.

Great Elm Capital Group has a beta of 0.77, meaning that its share price is 23% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MFS Multimarket Income Trust has a beta of 0.53, meaning that its share price is 47% less volatile than the broader market.

MFS Multimarket Income Trust has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Great Elm Capital Group.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Great Elm Capital Group$49.99M1.47-$31.79M-$2.39N/A
MFS Multimarket Income TrustN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

In the previous week, Great Elm Capital Group had 1 more articles in the media than MFS Multimarket Income Trust. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Great Elm Capital Group and 2 mentions for MFS Multimarket Income Trust. MFS Multimarket Income Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.91 beat Great Elm Capital Group's score of 0.44 indicating that MFS Multimarket Income Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Great Elm Capital Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
MFS Multimarket Income Trust
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Great Elm Capital Group presently has a consensus target price of $10.50, suggesting a potential upside of 98.49%. Given Great Elm Capital Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Great Elm Capital Group is more favorable than MFS Multimarket Income Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Great Elm Capital Group
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75
MFS Multimarket Income Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Great Elm Capital Group pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 18.9%. MFS Multimarket Income Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.41 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.4%. Great Elm Capital Group pays out -41.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Great Elm Capital Group has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Great Elm Capital Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

38.8% of Great Elm Capital Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.0% of MFS Multimarket Income Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 3.9% of Great Elm Capital Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

MFS Multimarket Income Trust has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Great Elm Capital Group's net margin of -70.13%. Great Elm Capital Group's return on equity of 14.16% beat MFS Multimarket Income Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Great Elm Capital Group-70.13% 14.16% 4.88%
MFS Multimarket Income Trust N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Great Elm Capital Group beats MFS Multimarket Income Trust on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Great Elm Capital Group compare to The Korea Fund?

The Korea Fund (NYSE:KF) and Great Elm Capital Group (NASDAQ:GECC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings and dividends.

Great Elm Capital Group has a consensus target price of $10.50, indicating a potential upside of 98.49%. Given Great Elm Capital Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Great Elm Capital Group is more favorable than The Korea Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
The Korea Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Great Elm Capital Group
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75

In the previous week, Great Elm Capital Group had 1 more articles in the media than The Korea Fund. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Great Elm Capital Group and 2 mentions for The Korea Fund. The Korea Fund's average media sentiment score of 1.77 beat Great Elm Capital Group's score of 0.44 indicating that The Korea Fund is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
The Korea Fund
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Great Elm Capital Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

The Korea Fund has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Great Elm Capital Group's net margin of -70.13%. Great Elm Capital Group's return on equity of 14.16% beat The Korea Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
The Korea FundN/A N/A N/A
Great Elm Capital Group -70.13%14.16%4.88%

The Korea Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Great Elm Capital Group pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 18.9%. Great Elm Capital Group pays out -41.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Great Elm Capital Group has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Great Elm Capital Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

70.0% of The Korea Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.8% of Great Elm Capital Group shares are held by institutional investors. 59.5% of The Korea Fund shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of Great Elm Capital Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

The Korea Fund has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Great Elm Capital Group.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Korea FundN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Great Elm Capital Group$49.99M1.47-$31.79M-$2.39N/A

The Korea Fund has a beta of 1.58, suggesting that its stock price is 58% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Great Elm Capital Group has a beta of 0.77, suggesting that its stock price is 23% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Great Elm Capital Group beats The Korea Fund on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Great Elm Capital Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GECC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GECC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GECC vs. The Competition

Export
MetricGreat Elm Capital GroupCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$71.82M$5.56B$14.05B$12.76B
Dividend Yield19.34%7.47%5.92%10.01%
P/E Ratio-2.2137.1728.9725.53
Price / Sales1.471,147.88474.3394.29
Price / Cash1.1948.2238.6149.39
Price / Book0.663.713.736.11
Net Income-$31.79M$417.17M$1.31B$347.58M
7 Day Performance3.52%1.58%1.46%4.91%
1 Month Performance-0.38%-0.15%1.29%-2.06%
1 Year Performance-51.91%7.11%13.60%21.03%

Great Elm Capital Group Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GECC
Great Elm Capital Group
2.3034 of 5 stars		$5.29
+2.3%		$10.50
+98.5%		-51.6%$71.82M$49.99MN/AN/A
MIN
MFS Intermediate Income Trust
N/A$2.40
+0.2%		N/A-10.0%$272.55M$11.49MN/AN/A
NSLR
Neostellar Capital
3.3658 of 5 stars		$10.16
-0.4%		$15.00
+47.6%		N/A$268.94M$1.69M1.469
TDF
Templeton Dragon Fund
N/A$10.61
-1.0%		N/A+6.5%$267.26MN/AN/A147,000
MMT
MFS Multimarket Income Trust
N/A$4.34
-0.3%		N/A-6.5%$238.08MN/AN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:GECC) was last updated on 8/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
They didn't warn anyone in 1971. This time someone is warning you.
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
The $15 Gold Fund That Pays Up to $1,152/Month
Gold is hitting record highs, but most investors are leaving income on the table. A $15 fund is quietly paying...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Where to Put $100 Before Trump's New Tech Law Rolls Out
The Financial Times says a new tech law puts America 'on the verge of a financial revolution.' Yahoo Finance e...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel