Which has stronger earnings & valuation, TKR or HLIO?

Timken has higher revenue and earnings than Helios Technologies. Timken is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Helios Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Timken $4.67B 2.10 $288.40M $4.40 32.10 Helios Technologies $839M 3.55 $48.40M $1.82 49.58

Does the media prefer TKR or HLIO?

In the previous week, Timken had 3 more articles in the media than Helios Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Timken and 11 mentions for Helios Technologies. Timken's average media sentiment score of 1.22 beat Helios Technologies' score of 0.61 indicating that Timken is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Timken 4 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Helios Technologies 7 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor EXP or HLIO?

In the previous week, Helios Technologies had 9 more articles in the media than Eagle Materials. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Helios Technologies and 2 mentions for Eagle Materials. Helios Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.61 beat Eagle Materials' score of 0.00 indicating that Helios Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Eagle Materials 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Helios Technologies 7 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has better earnings and valuation, ACA or HLIO?

Arcosa has higher revenue and earnings than Helios Technologies. Arcosa is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Helios Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Arcosa $2.88B 2.47 $208.40M $4.53 31.97 Helios Technologies $839M 3.55 $48.40M $1.82 49.58

Does the media favor ACA or HLIO?

In the previous week, Arcosa had 4 more articles in the media than Helios Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Arcosa and 11 mentions for Helios Technologies. Helios Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.61 beat Arcosa's score of 0.31 indicating that Helios Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Arcosa 3 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Helios Technologies 7 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to HLIO or FBIN?

In the previous week, Helios Technologies had 8 more articles in the media than Fortune Brands Innovations. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Helios Technologies and 3 mentions for Fortune Brands Innovations. Fortune Brands Innovations' average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Helios Technologies' score of 0.61 indicating that Fortune Brands Innovations is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Helios Technologies 7 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Fortune Brands Innovations 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Helios Technologies (HLIO) Competitors

$90.24 -2.64 (-2.84%)

Closing price 06/26/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$85.28 -4.96 (-5.50%)

As of 06/26/2026 06:10 PM Eastern

Compare

HLIO vs. TKR, EXP, ACA, WFG, and FBIN

Should you buy Helios Technologies stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Helios Technologies with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Helios Technologies include Timken (TKR), Eagle Materials (EXP), Arcosa (ACA), West Fraser Timber (WFG), and Fortune Brands Innovations (FBIN).

How does Helios Technologies compare to Timken?

Timken (NYSE:TKR) and Helios Technologies (NYSE:HLIO) are related companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

Timken has a beta of 1.21, indicating that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Helios Technologies has a beta of 1.28, indicating that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the broader market.

Helios Technologies has a net margin of 6.98% compared to Timken's net margin of 6.60%. Timken's return on equity of 11.84% beat Helios Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Timken	6.60%	11.84%	5.79%
Helios Technologies	6.98%	10.49%	6.29%

89.1% of Timken shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.7% of Helios Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 8.1% of Timken shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Helios Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Timken presently has a consensus price target of $141.63, suggesting a potential upside of 0.28%. Helios Technologies has a consensus price target of $89.75, suggesting a potential downside of 0.55%. Given Timken's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Timken is more favorable than Helios Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Timken	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Helios Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.14

Timken pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Helios Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Timken pays out 32.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Helios Technologies pays out 26.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Timken has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years. Timken is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Timken has higher revenue and earnings than Helios Technologies. Timken is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Helios Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Timken	$4.67B	2.10	$288.40M	$4.40	32.10
Helios Technologies	$839M	3.55	$48.40M	$1.82	49.58

In the previous week, Timken had 3 more articles in the media than Helios Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Timken and 11 mentions for Helios Technologies. Timken's average media sentiment score of 1.22 beat Helios Technologies' score of 0.61 indicating that Timken is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Timken	4 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Helios Technologies	7 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Timken beats Helios Technologies on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Helios Technologies compare to Eagle Materials?

Eagle Materials (NYSE:EXP) and Helios Technologies (NYSE:HLIO) are both mid-cap construction companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, profitability, valuation and risk.

Eagle Materials presently has a consensus price target of $224.30, indicating a potential downside of 4.04%. Helios Technologies has a consensus price target of $89.75, indicating a potential downside of 0.55%. Given Helios Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Helios Technologies is more favorable than Eagle Materials.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Eagle Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	10 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.09
Helios Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.14

In the previous week, Helios Technologies had 9 more articles in the media than Eagle Materials. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Helios Technologies and 2 mentions for Eagle Materials. Helios Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.61 beat Eagle Materials' score of 0.00 indicating that Helios Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Eagle Materials	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Helios Technologies	7 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Eagle Materials pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Helios Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Eagle Materials pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Helios Technologies pays out 26.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

96.1% of Eagle Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.7% of Helios Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.7% of Eagle Materials shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Helios Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Eagle Materials has a beta of 1.37, indicating that its share price is 37% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Helios Technologies has a beta of 1.28, indicating that its share price is 28% more volatile than the broader market.

Eagle Materials has a net margin of 18.36% compared to Helios Technologies' net margin of 6.98%. Eagle Materials' return on equity of 28.27% beat Helios Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Eagle Materials	18.36%	28.27%	11.70%
Helios Technologies	6.98%	10.49%	6.29%

Eagle Materials has higher revenue and earnings than Helios Technologies. Eagle Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Helios Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Eagle Materials	$2.31B	3.13	$423.81M	$13.12	17.82
Helios Technologies	$839M	3.55	$48.40M	$1.82	49.58

Summary

Eagle Materials beats Helios Technologies on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Helios Technologies compare to Arcosa?

Arcosa (NYSE:ACA) and Helios Technologies (NYSE:HLIO) are both mid-cap construction companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, valuation and risk.

Arcosa currently has a consensus price target of $138.33, indicating a potential downside of 4.48%. Helios Technologies has a consensus price target of $89.75, indicating a potential downside of 0.55%. Given Helios Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Helios Technologies is more favorable than Arcosa.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Arcosa	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.29
Helios Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.14

Arcosa pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Helios Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Arcosa pays out 4.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Helios Technologies pays out 26.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Arcosa has a net margin of 7.88% compared to Helios Technologies' net margin of 6.98%. Helios Technologies' return on equity of 10.49% beat Arcosa's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Arcosa	7.88%	8.52%	4.41%
Helios Technologies	6.98%	10.49%	6.29%

Arcosa has a beta of 1.06, indicating that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Helios Technologies has a beta of 1.28, indicating that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Arcosa had 4 more articles in the media than Helios Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Arcosa and 11 mentions for Helios Technologies. Helios Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.61 beat Arcosa's score of 0.31 indicating that Helios Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Arcosa	3 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Helios Technologies	7 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

90.7% of Arcosa shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.7% of Helios Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Arcosa shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Helios Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Arcosa has higher revenue and earnings than Helios Technologies. Arcosa is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Helios Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Arcosa	$2.88B	2.47	$208.40M	$4.53	31.97
Helios Technologies	$839M	3.55	$48.40M	$1.82	49.58

Summary

Helios Technologies beats Arcosa on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Helios Technologies compare to West Fraser Timber?

Helios Technologies (NYSE:HLIO) and West Fraser Timber (NYSE:WFG) are both mid-cap construction companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends and profitability.

94.7% of Helios Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.2% of West Fraser Timber shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Helios Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of West Fraser Timber shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Helios Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. West Fraser Timber pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Helios Technologies pays out 26.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. West Fraser Timber pays out -8.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. West Fraser Timber has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. West Fraser Timber is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Helios Technologies has a net margin of 6.98% compared to West Fraser Timber's net margin of -21.86%. Helios Technologies' return on equity of 10.49% beat West Fraser Timber's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Helios Technologies	6.98%	10.49%	6.29%
West Fraser Timber	-21.86%	-9.67%	-7.41%

Helios Technologies has a beta of 1.28, suggesting that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, West Fraser Timber has a beta of 0.99, suggesting that its stock price is 1% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Helios Technologies had 11 more articles in the media than West Fraser Timber. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Helios Technologies and 0 mentions for West Fraser Timber. Helios Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.61 beat West Fraser Timber's score of 0.00 indicating that Helios Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Helios Technologies	Positive
West Fraser Timber	Neutral

Helios Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than West Fraser Timber. West Fraser Timber is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Helios Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Helios Technologies	$839M	3.55	$48.40M	$1.82	49.58
West Fraser Timber	$5.46B	0.99	-$937M	-$15.04	N/A

Helios Technologies presently has a consensus price target of $89.75, indicating a potential downside of 0.55%. West Fraser Timber has a consensus price target of $82.60, indicating a potential upside of 19.14%. Given West Fraser Timber's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe West Fraser Timber is more favorable than Helios Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Helios Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.14
West Fraser Timber	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.38

Summary

Helios Technologies beats West Fraser Timber on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Helios Technologies compare to Fortune Brands Innovations?

Helios Technologies (NYSE:HLIO) and Fortune Brands Innovations (NYSE:FBIN) are both mid-cap construction materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, earnings and risk.

94.7% of Helios Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.6% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Helios Technologies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Helios Technologies currently has a consensus price target of $89.75, indicating a potential downside of 0.55%. Fortune Brands Innovations has a consensus price target of $51.31, indicating a potential upside of 11.48%. Given Fortune Brands Innovations' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Fortune Brands Innovations is more favorable than Helios Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Helios Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.14
Fortune Brands Innovations	3 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.06

Helios Technologies has a net margin of 6.98% compared to Fortune Brands Innovations' net margin of 6.12%. Fortune Brands Innovations' return on equity of 17.72% beat Helios Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Helios Technologies	6.98%	10.49%	6.29%
Fortune Brands Innovations	6.12%	17.72%	6.40%

In the previous week, Helios Technologies had 8 more articles in the media than Fortune Brands Innovations. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Helios Technologies and 3 mentions for Fortune Brands Innovations. Fortune Brands Innovations' average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Helios Technologies' score of 0.61 indicating that Fortune Brands Innovations is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Helios Technologies	7 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Fortune Brands Innovations	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Fortune Brands Innovations has higher revenue and earnings than Helios Technologies. Fortune Brands Innovations is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Helios Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Helios Technologies	$839M	3.55	$48.40M	$1.82	49.58
Fortune Brands Innovations	$4.44B	1.24	$298.80M	$2.25	20.46

Helios Technologies has a beta of 1.28, indicating that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.37, indicating that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the broader market.

Helios Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Fortune Brands Innovations pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Helios Technologies pays out 26.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fortune Brands Innovations pays out 46.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Fortune Brands Innovations has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Fortune Brands Innovations is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Fortune Brands Innovations beats Helios Technologies on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Helios Technologies News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding HLIO and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

HLIO vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Helios Technologies	Misc. Fabricated Metal Products Industry	Construction Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$3.07B	$1.36B	$10.31B	$23.20B
Dividend Yield	0.52%	0.52%	1.89%	4.10%
P/E Ratio	49.58	14.85	19.26	31.64
Price / Sales	3.55	66.68	4.21	109.21
Price / Cash	17.59	17.59	18.11	24.58
Price / Book	3.21	1.96	5.51	4.74
Net Income	$48.40M	-$86.26M	$567.71M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-0.27%	1.91%	1.74%	0.99%
1 Month Performance	9.40%	8.37%	21.72%	0.86%
1 Year Performance	N/A	N/A	13.81%	25.18%

Helios Technologies Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
HLIO Helios Technologies	3.752 of 5 stars	$90.24 -2.8%	$89.75 -0.5%	N/A	$3.07B	$839M	49.58	2,300	Positive News Insider Trade High Trading Volume
TKR Timken	4.5664 of 5 stars	$141.71 +1.7%	$141.63 -0.1%	+90.3%	$9.69B	$4.58B	32.21	19,000	Positive News Analyst Revision
EXP Eagle Materials	1.7532 of 5 stars	$224.86 +5.4%	$224.30 -0.2%	+15.2%	$6.59B	$2.31B	17.14	2,800	High Trading Volume
ACA Arcosa	2.6964 of 5 stars	$135.76 +2.0%	$138.33 +1.9%	+65.0%	$6.54B	$2.88B	29.97	6,390	Analyst Downgrade High Trading Volume
WFG West Fraser Timber	2.5923 of 5 stars	$70.20 -0.3%	$82.60 +17.7%	-6.6%	$5.51B	$5.46B	N/A	9,600	Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:HLIO) was last updated on 6/27/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Helios Technologies (HLIO) Competitors

HLIO vs. TKR, EXP, ACA, WFG, and FBIN

How does Helios Technologies compare to Timken?

Summary

How does Helios Technologies compare to Eagle Materials?

Summary

How does Helios Technologies compare to Arcosa?

Summary

How does Helios Technologies compare to West Fraser Timber?

Summary

How does Helios Technologies compare to Fortune Brands Innovations?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

HLIO vs. The Competition

Helios Technologies Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Helios Technologies (HLIO) Competitors

HLIO vs. TKR, EXP, ACA, WFG, and FBIN

How does Helios Technologies compare to Timken?

Which has more volatility & risk, TKR or HLIO?

Is TKR or HLIO more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in TKR or HLIO?

Do analysts rate TKR or HLIO?

Is TKR or HLIO a better dividend stock?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, TKR or HLIO?

Does the media prefer TKR or HLIO?

Summary

How does Helios Technologies compare to Eagle Materials?

Do analysts rate EXP or HLIO?

Does the media favor EXP or HLIO?

Is EXP or HLIO a better dividend stock?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in EXP or HLIO?

Which has more risk & volatility, EXP or HLIO?

Is EXP or HLIO more profitable?

Which has better earnings and valuation, EXP or HLIO?

Summary

How does Helios Technologies compare to Arcosa?

Do analysts recommend ACA or HLIO?

Is ACA or HLIO a better dividend stock?

Is ACA or HLIO more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, ACA or HLIO?

Does the media favor ACA or HLIO?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in ACA or HLIO?

Which has better earnings and valuation, ACA or HLIO?

Summary

How does Helios Technologies compare to West Fraser Timber?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in HLIO or WFG?

Is HLIO or WFG a better dividend stock?

Is HLIO or WFG more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, HLIO or WFG?

Does the media prefer HLIO or WFG?

Which has better earnings & valuation, HLIO or WFG?

Do analysts rate HLIO or WFG?

Summary

How does Helios Technologies compare to Fortune Brands Innovations?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in HLIO or FBIN?

Do analysts recommend HLIO or FBIN?

Is HLIO or FBIN more profitable?

Does the media refer more to HLIO or FBIN?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, HLIO or FBIN?

Which has more volatility & risk, HLIO or FBIN?

Is HLIO or FBIN a better dividend stock?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

HLIO vs. The Competition

Helios Technologies Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools