Free Trial

Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. (CPAC) Competitors

Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. logo
$10.62 +0.11 (+1.00%)
As of 01:04 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

CPAC vs. USLM, BW, HLIO, CXT, and TGLS

Should you buy Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. include United States Lime & Minerals (USLM), Babcock (BW), Helios Technologies (HLIO), Crane NXT (CXT), and Tecnoglass (TGLS). These companies are all part of the "construction materials" industry.

How does Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. compare to United States Lime & Minerals?

United States Lime & Minerals (NASDAQ:USLM) and Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. (NYSE:CPAC) are both construction companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and earnings.

United States Lime & Minerals has a net margin of 35.40% compared to Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A.'s net margin of 8.37%. United States Lime & Minerals' return on equity of 21.28% beat Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A.'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
United States Lime & Minerals35.40% 21.28% 19.70%
Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. 8.37%14.30%5.79%

United States Lime & Minerals pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.3%. United States Lime & Minerals pays out 5.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. pays out 91.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. United States Lime & Minerals has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

27.1% of United States Lime & Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of United States Lime & Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

United States Lime & Minerals has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. has a beta of 0.75, indicating that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market.

United States Lime & Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A.. Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than United States Lime & Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
United States Lime & Minerals$369.31M8.54$134.27M$4.5424.22
Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A.$593.95M1.52$43.27M$0.6117.42

In the previous week, United States Lime & Minerals and United States Lime & Minerals both had 1 articles in the media. United States Lime & Minerals' average media sentiment score of 1.90 beat Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A.'s score of -1.00 indicating that United States Lime & Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
United States Lime & Minerals Very Positive
Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. Negative

Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. has a consensus target price of $12.90, indicating a potential upside of 21.41%. Given Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A.'s higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. is more favorable than United States Lime & Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
United States Lime & Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A.
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

United States Lime & Minerals beats Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. compare to Babcock?

Babcock (NYSE:BW) and Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. (NYSE:CPAC) are both construction materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, dividends and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Babcock had 17 more articles in the media than Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A.. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Babcock and 1 mentions for Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A.. Babcock's average media sentiment score of 0.05 beat Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A.'s score of -1.00 indicating that Babcock is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Babcock Neutral
Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. Negative

Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Babcock. Babcock is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Babcock$653.49M4.17-$36.16M-$0.88N/A
Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A.$593.95M1.52$43.27M$0.6117.42

Babcock presently has a consensus target price of $14.25, suggesting a potential downside of 22.16%. Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. has a consensus target price of $12.90, suggesting a potential upside of 21.41%. Given Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A.'s higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. is more favorable than Babcock.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Babcock
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A.
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Babcock has a beta of 1.08, suggesting that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. has a beta of 0.75, suggesting that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market.

Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. has a net margin of 8.37% compared to Babcock's net margin of -13.63%. Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A.'s return on equity of 14.30% beat Babcock's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Babcock-13.63% N/A -1.41%
Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. 8.37%14.30%5.79%

83.2% of Babcock shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of Babcock shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Babcock beats Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. compare to Helios Technologies?

Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. (NYSE:CPAC) and Helios Technologies (NYSE:HLIO) are both construction companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership and valuation.

94.7% of Helios Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Helios Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. has a net margin of 8.37% compared to Helios Technologies' net margin of 6.98%. Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A.'s return on equity of 14.30% beat Helios Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A.8.37% 14.30% 5.79%
Helios Technologies 6.98%10.49%6.29%

Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. has a beta of 0.75, suggesting that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Helios Technologies has a beta of 1.23, suggesting that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the broader market.

Helios Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A.. Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Helios Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A.$593.95M1.52$43.27M$0.6117.42
Helios Technologies$871.90M3.16$48.40M$1.8245.83

Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.3%. Helios Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. pays out 91.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Helios Technologies pays out 26.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

In the previous week, Helios Technologies had 4 more articles in the media than Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A.. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Helios Technologies and 1 mentions for Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A.. Helios Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A.'s score of -1.00 indicating that Helios Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. Negative
Helios Technologies Positive

Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. presently has a consensus price target of $12.90, indicating a potential upside of 21.41%. Helios Technologies has a consensus price target of $89.75, indicating a potential upside of 7.60%. Given Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A.'s higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. is more favorable than Helios Technologies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A.
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Helios Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.14

Summary

Helios Technologies beats Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. on 15 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. compare to Crane NXT?

Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. (NYSE:CPAC) and Crane NXT (NYSE:CXT) are both construction materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. has a beta of 0.75, suggesting that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Crane NXT has a beta of 1.21, suggesting that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the broader market.

Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.3%. Crane NXT pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. pays out 91.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Crane NXT pays out 32.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Crane NXT has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. has a net margin of 8.37% compared to Crane NXT's net margin of 7.57%. Crane NXT's return on equity of 19.59% beat Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A.'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A.8.37% 14.30% 5.79%
Crane NXT 7.57%19.59%7.59%

Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. presently has a consensus target price of $12.90, suggesting a potential upside of 21.41%. Crane NXT has a consensus target price of $65.40, suggesting a potential upside of 81.57%. Given Crane NXT's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Crane NXT is more favorable than Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A..

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A.
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Crane NXT
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86

Crane NXT has higher revenue and earnings than Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A.. Crane NXT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A.$593.95M1.52$43.27M$0.6117.42
Crane NXT$1.71B1.21$145.10M$2.2416.08

In the previous week, Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. had 1 more articles in the media than Crane NXT. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. and 0 mentions for Crane NXT. Crane NXT's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A.'s score of -1.00 indicating that Crane NXT is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. Negative
Crane NXT Neutral

77.5% of Crane NXT shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Crane NXT shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Crane NXT beats Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. on 15 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. compare to Tecnoglass?

Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. (NYSE:CPAC) and Tecnoglass (NYSE:TGLS) are both small-cap construction companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.3%. Tecnoglass pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. pays out 91.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Tecnoglass pays out 18.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Tecnoglass has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

Tecnoglass has higher revenue and earnings than Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A.. Tecnoglass is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A.$593.95M1.52$43.27M$0.6117.42
Tecnoglass$983.61M1.95$159.57M$3.2313.38

Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. has a beta of 0.75, suggesting that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tecnoglass has a beta of 1.42, suggesting that its stock price is 42% more volatile than the broader market.

Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. currently has a consensus price target of $12.90, suggesting a potential upside of 21.41%. Tecnoglass has a consensus price target of $63.33, suggesting a potential upside of 46.50%. Given Tecnoglass' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Tecnoglass is more favorable than Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A..

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A.
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Tecnoglass
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

Tecnoglass has a net margin of 14.77% compared to Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A.'s net margin of 8.37%. Tecnoglass' return on equity of 21.51% beat Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A.'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A.8.37% 14.30% 5.79%
Tecnoglass 14.77%21.51%12.61%

37.4% of Tecnoglass shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Tecnoglass shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. and Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. both had 1 articles in the media. Tecnoglass' average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A.'s score of -1.00 indicating that Tecnoglass is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. Negative
Tecnoglass Positive

Summary

Tecnoglass beats Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. on 15 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CPAC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CPAC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CPAC vs. The Competition

MetricCementos Pacasmayo S.A.A.BLDG IndustryConstruction SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$891.82M$8.37B$9.59B$23.16B
Dividend Yield5.30%1.61%1.86%4.07%
P/E Ratio17.3617.6218.2430.85
Price / Sales1.528.173.9281.51
Price / Cash10.1312.8817.7919.43
Price / Book2.703.235.124.74
Net Income$43.27M$422.65M$560.55M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-0.42%1.53%0.33%0.69%
1 Month Performance-0.69%-1.55%0.26%1.52%
1 Year Performance78.57%26.89%15.01%28.72%

Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CPAC
Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A.
2.4893 of 5 stars
$10.63
+1.0%
$12.90
+21.4%
+79.3%$891.82M$593.95M17.361,975
USLM
United States Lime & Minerals
1.6235 of 5 stars
$109.41
+3.2%
N/A+8.6%$3.04B$369.31M24.10340
BW
Babcock
2.2036 of 5 stars
$19.68
+3.4%
$14.25
-27.6%
+2,363.3%$2.93B$587.70MN/A1,650
HLIO
Helios Technologies
3.8947 of 5 stars
$82.25
+4.0%
$89.75
+9.1%
N/A$2.61B$871.90M45.192,300
CXT
Crane NXT
3.7234 of 5 stars
$40.86
-0.6%
$65.40
+60.1%
-32.4%$2.35B$1.66B18.244,800

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:CPAC) was last updated on 6/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners