United States Lime & Minerals Competitors

United States Lime & Minerals (NASDAQ:USLM) and Vulcan Materials (NYSE:VMC) are both construction companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Dividends

United States Lime & Minerals pays an annual dividend of $0.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Vulcan Materials pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Vulcan Materials pays out 31.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. United States Lime & Minerals has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Vulcan Materials has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares United States Lime & Minerals and Vulcan Materials' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Vulcan Materials has higher revenue and earnings than United States Lime & Minerals.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for United States Lime & Minerals and Vulcan Materials, as provided by MarketBeat.

Vulcan Materials has a consensus price target of $145.5789, indicating a potential downside of 15.94%. Given Vulcan Materials' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Vulcan Materials is more favorable than United States Lime & Minerals.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

27.4% of United States Lime & Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.8% of Vulcan Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of United States Lime & Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Vulcan Materials shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk and Volatility

United States Lime & Minerals has a beta of 0.68, indicating that its share price is 32% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Vulcan Materials has a beta of 0.6, indicating that its share price is 40% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares United States Lime & Minerals and Vulcan Materials' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

United States Lime & Minerals (NASDAQ:USLM) and Martin Marietta Materials (NYSE:MLM) are both construction companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Dividends

United States Lime & Minerals pays an annual dividend of $0.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Martin Marietta Materials pays an annual dividend of $2.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Martin Marietta Materials pays out 23.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. United States Lime & Minerals has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Martin Marietta Materials has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Martin Marietta Materials is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares United States Lime & Minerals and Martin Marietta Materials' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Martin Marietta Materials has higher revenue and earnings than United States Lime & Minerals.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for United States Lime & Minerals and Martin Marietta Materials, as provided by MarketBeat.

Martin Marietta Materials has a consensus price target of $277.3684, indicating a potential downside of 19.78%. Given Martin Marietta Materials' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Martin Marietta Materials is more favorable than United States Lime & Minerals.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

27.4% of United States Lime & Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.8% of Martin Marietta Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of United States Lime & Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Martin Marietta Materials shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk and Volatility

United States Lime & Minerals has a beta of 0.68, indicating that its share price is 32% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Martin Marietta Materials has a beta of 0.69, indicating that its share price is 31% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares United States Lime & Minerals and Martin Marietta Materials' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Martin Marietta Materials beats United States Lime & Minerals on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

United States Lime & Minerals (NASDAQ:USLM) and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile (NYSE:SQM) are both construction companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

27.4% of United States Lime & Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.8% of Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of United States Lime & Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares United States Lime & Minerals and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares United States Lime & Minerals and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile has higher revenue and earnings than United States Lime & Minerals.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for United States Lime & Minerals and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile has a consensus price target of $53.50, indicating a potential upside of 1.33%. Given Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile is more favorable than United States Lime & Minerals.

Risk and Volatility

United States Lime & Minerals has a beta of 0.68, indicating that its share price is 32% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile has a beta of 0.96, indicating that its share price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

United States Lime & Minerals pays an annual dividend of $0.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile pays an annual dividend of $0.29 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile pays out 27.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. United States Lime & Minerals has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Summary

Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile beats United States Lime & Minerals on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

United States Lime & Minerals (NASDAQ:USLM) and Teck Resources (NYSE:TECK) are both construction companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and risk.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

27.4% of United States Lime & Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.1% of Teck Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of United States Lime & Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares United States Lime & Minerals and Teck Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares United States Lime & Minerals and Teck Resources' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

United States Lime & Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Teck Resources.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for United States Lime & Minerals and Teck Resources, as provided by MarketBeat.

Teck Resources has a consensus target price of $25.5333, indicating a potential upside of 30.01%. Given Teck Resources' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Teck Resources is more favorable than United States Lime & Minerals.

Risk & Volatility

United States Lime & Minerals has a beta of 0.68, meaning that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Teck Resources has a beta of 1.27, meaning that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

United States Lime & Minerals pays an annual dividend of $0.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Teck Resources pays an annual dividend of $0.15 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Teck Resources pays out 6.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. United States Lime & Minerals has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Teck Resources has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Summary

United States Lime & Minerals beats Teck Resources on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

United States Lime & Minerals (NASDAQ:USLM) and MDU Resources Group (NYSE:MDU) are both construction companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and risk.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

27.4% of United States Lime & Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.4% of MDU Resources Group shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of United States Lime & Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of MDU Resources Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares United States Lime & Minerals and MDU Resources Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares United States Lime & Minerals and MDU Resources Group's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

MDU Resources Group has higher revenue and earnings than United States Lime & Minerals.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for United States Lime & Minerals and MDU Resources Group, as provided by MarketBeat.

MDU Resources Group has a consensus target price of $28.3333, indicating a potential downside of 11.57%. Given MDU Resources Group's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe MDU Resources Group is more favorable than United States Lime & Minerals.

Risk & Volatility

United States Lime & Minerals has a beta of 0.68, meaning that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, MDU Resources Group has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

United States Lime & Minerals pays an annual dividend of $0.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. MDU Resources Group pays an annual dividend of $0.85 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. MDU Resources Group pays out 50.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. United States Lime & Minerals has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and MDU Resources Group has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Summary

MDU Resources Group beats United States Lime & Minerals on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

United States Lime & Minerals (NASDAQ:USLM) and Summit Materials (NYSE:SUM) are both construction companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and risk.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

27.4% of United States Lime & Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of United States Lime & Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Summit Materials shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares United States Lime & Minerals and Summit Materials' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares United States Lime & Minerals and Summit Materials' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Summit Materials has higher revenue and earnings than United States Lime & Minerals.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for United States Lime & Minerals and Summit Materials, as provided by MarketBeat.

Summit Materials has a consensus target price of $22.00, indicating a potential downside of 25.20%. Given Summit Materials' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Summit Materials is more favorable than United States Lime & Minerals.

Risk & Volatility

United States Lime & Minerals has a beta of 0.68, meaning that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Summit Materials has a beta of 1.37, meaning that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

United States Lime & Minerals beats Summit Materials on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.