United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) Competitors

United States Lime & Minerals pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Eagle Materials pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. United States Lime & Minerals pays out 5.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Eagle Materials pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. United States Lime & Minerals has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Eagle Materials had 1 more articles in the media than United States Lime & Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Eagle Materials and 1 mentions for United States Lime & Minerals. United States Lime & Minerals' average media sentiment score of 1.91 beat Eagle Materials' score of 0.00 indicating that United States Lime & Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

United States Lime & Minerals has a net margin of 35.40% compared to Eagle Materials' net margin of 18.36%. Eagle Materials' return on equity of 28.27% beat United States Lime & Minerals' return on equity.

Eagle Materials has a consensus target price of $224.30, suggesting a potential downside of 4.04%. Given Eagle Materials' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Eagle Materials is more favorable than United States Lime & Minerals.

United States Lime & Minerals has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Eagle Materials has a beta of 1.37, indicating that its share price is 37% more volatile than the broader market.

27.1% of United States Lime & Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.1% of Eagle Materials shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of United States Lime & Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Eagle Materials shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Eagle Materials has higher revenue and earnings than United States Lime & Minerals. Eagle Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than United States Lime & Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

United States Lime & Minerals pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. West Fraser Timber pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. United States Lime & Minerals pays out 5.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. West Fraser Timber pays out -8.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. United States Lime & Minerals has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and West Fraser Timber has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. West Fraser Timber is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, United States Lime & Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than West Fraser Timber. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for United States Lime & Minerals and 0 mentions for West Fraser Timber. United States Lime & Minerals' average media sentiment score of 1.91 beat West Fraser Timber's score of 0.00 indicating that United States Lime & Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

United States Lime & Minerals has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, West Fraser Timber has a beta of 0.99, indicating that its share price is 1% less volatile than the broader market.

27.1% of United States Lime & Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.2% of West Fraser Timber shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of United States Lime & Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of West Fraser Timber shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

United States Lime & Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than West Fraser Timber. West Fraser Timber is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than United States Lime & Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

United States Lime & Minerals has a net margin of 35.40% compared to West Fraser Timber's net margin of -21.86%. United States Lime & Minerals' return on equity of 21.28% beat West Fraser Timber's return on equity.

West Fraser Timber has a consensus price target of $82.60, suggesting a potential upside of 19.14%. Given West Fraser Timber's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe West Fraser Timber is more favorable than United States Lime & Minerals.

In the previous week, Fortune Brands Innovations had 1 more articles in the media than United States Lime & Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Fortune Brands Innovations and 1 mentions for United States Lime & Minerals. United States Lime & Minerals' average media sentiment score of 1.91 beat Fortune Brands Innovations' score of 1.25 indicating that United States Lime & Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Fortune Brands Innovations pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. United States Lime & Minerals pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Fortune Brands Innovations pays out 46.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. United States Lime & Minerals pays out 5.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Fortune Brands Innovations has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and United States Lime & Minerals has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Fortune Brands Innovations has higher revenue and earnings than United States Lime & Minerals. Fortune Brands Innovations is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than United States Lime & Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Fortune Brands Innovations presently has a consensus target price of $51.31, indicating a potential upside of 11.48%. Given Fortune Brands Innovations' higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Fortune Brands Innovations is more favorable than United States Lime & Minerals.

United States Lime & Minerals has a net margin of 35.40% compared to Fortune Brands Innovations' net margin of 6.12%. United States Lime & Minerals' return on equity of 21.28% beat Fortune Brands Innovations' return on equity.

87.6% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.1% of United States Lime & Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of United States Lime & Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.37, suggesting that its share price is 37% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, United States Lime & Minerals has a beta of 0.7, suggesting that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Champion Homes has higher revenue and earnings than United States Lime & Minerals. United States Lime & Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Champion Homes, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, United States Lime & Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than Champion Homes. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for United States Lime & Minerals and 0 mentions for Champion Homes. United States Lime & Minerals' average media sentiment score of 1.91 beat Champion Homes' score of 0.00 indicating that United States Lime & Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

27.1% of United States Lime & Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of United States Lime & Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Champion Homes shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Champion Homes has a consensus target price of $93.00, suggesting a potential upside of 4.74%. Given Champion Homes' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Champion Homes is more favorable than United States Lime & Minerals.

United States Lime & Minerals has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Champion Homes has a beta of 1.04, indicating that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

United States Lime & Minerals has a net margin of 35.40% compared to Champion Homes' net margin of 7.77%. United States Lime & Minerals' return on equity of 21.28% beat Champion Homes' return on equity.