Host Hotels & Resorts (HST) Competitors

Host Hotels & Resorts currently has a consensus target price of $24.27, suggesting a potential upside of 3.79%. Extra Space Storage has a consensus target price of $147.73, suggesting a potential downside of 1.28%. Given Host Hotels & Resorts' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Host Hotels & Resorts is more favorable than Extra Space Storage.

Extra Space Storage has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Host Hotels & Resorts. Host Hotels & Resorts is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Extra Space Storage, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Host Hotels & Resorts had 12 more articles in the media than Extra Space Storage. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Host Hotels & Resorts and 11 mentions for Extra Space Storage. Extra Space Storage's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Host Hotels & Resorts' score of 0.98 indicating that Extra Space Storage is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Host Hotels & Resorts has a beta of 1.1, suggesting that its share price is 10% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Extra Space Storage has a beta of 1.18, suggesting that its share price is 18% more volatile than the broader market.

98.5% of Host Hotels & Resorts shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.1% of Extra Space Storage shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Host Hotels & Resorts shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Extra Space Storage shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Extra Space Storage has a net margin of 27.80% compared to Host Hotels & Resorts' net margin of 16.51%. Host Hotels & Resorts' return on equity of 15.36% beat Extra Space Storage's return on equity.

Host Hotels & Resorts pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Extra Space Storage pays an annual dividend of $6.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Host Hotels & Resorts pays out 54.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Extra Space Storage pays out 143.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Host Hotels & Resorts has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Extra Space Storage has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Host Hotels & Resorts has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Iron Mountain. Host Hotels & Resorts is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Iron Mountain, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

80.1% of Iron Mountain shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.5% of Host Hotels & Resorts shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.7% of Iron Mountain shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Host Hotels & Resorts shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Host Hotels & Resorts has a net margin of 16.51% compared to Iron Mountain's net margin of 5.54%. Host Hotels & Resorts' return on equity of 15.36% beat Iron Mountain's return on equity.

Iron Mountain pays an annual dividend of $3.46 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Host Hotels & Resorts pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Iron Mountain pays out 380.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Host Hotels & Resorts pays out 54.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Iron Mountain has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Host Hotels & Resorts has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Host Hotels & Resorts is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Iron Mountain has a beta of 1.2, meaning that its share price is 20% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Host Hotels & Resorts has a beta of 1.1, meaning that its share price is 10% more volatile than the broader market.

Iron Mountain currently has a consensus target price of $135.17, indicating a potential upside of 10.66%. Host Hotels & Resorts has a consensus target price of $24.27, indicating a potential upside of 3.79%. Given Iron Mountain's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Iron Mountain is more favorable than Host Hotels & Resorts.

In the previous week, Iron Mountain had 7 more articles in the media than Host Hotels & Resorts. MarketBeat recorded 30 mentions for Iron Mountain and 23 mentions for Host Hotels & Resorts. Host Hotels & Resorts' average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Iron Mountain's score of 0.76 indicating that Host Hotels & Resorts is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Host Hotels & Resorts pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Park Hotels & Resorts pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.0%. Host Hotels & Resorts pays out 54.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Park Hotels & Resorts pays out -91.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Host Hotels & Resorts has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Park Hotels & Resorts has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Park Hotels & Resorts is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Host Hotels & Resorts has a net margin of 16.51% compared to Park Hotels & Resorts' net margin of -8.49%. Host Hotels & Resorts' return on equity of 15.36% beat Park Hotels & Resorts' return on equity.

98.5% of Host Hotels & Resorts shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.7% of Park Hotels & Resorts shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Host Hotels & Resorts shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of Park Hotels & Resorts shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Host Hotels & Resorts has higher revenue and earnings than Park Hotels & Resorts. Park Hotels & Resorts is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Host Hotels & Resorts, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Host Hotels & Resorts had 15 more articles in the media than Park Hotels & Resorts. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Host Hotels & Resorts and 8 mentions for Park Hotels & Resorts. Park Hotels & Resorts' average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Host Hotels & Resorts' score of 0.98 indicating that Park Hotels & Resorts is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Host Hotels & Resorts presently has a consensus target price of $24.27, suggesting a potential upside of 3.79%. Park Hotels & Resorts has a consensus target price of $13.18, suggesting a potential downside of 8.31%. Given Host Hotels & Resorts' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Host Hotels & Resorts is more favorable than Park Hotels & Resorts.

Host Hotels & Resorts has a beta of 1.1, suggesting that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Park Hotels & Resorts has a beta of 1.34, suggesting that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the broader market.

98.5% of Host Hotels & Resorts shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.5% of Prologis shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Host Hotels & Resorts shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Prologis shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Prologis has a net margin of 45.79% compared to Host Hotels & Resorts' net margin of 16.51%. Host Hotels & Resorts' return on equity of 15.36% beat Prologis' return on equity.

Host Hotels & Resorts currently has a consensus price target of $24.27, indicating a potential upside of 3.79%. Prologis has a consensus price target of $154.57, indicating a potential upside of 11.16%. Given Prologis' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Prologis is more favorable than Host Hotels & Resorts.

Host Hotels & Resorts has a beta of 1.1, meaning that its share price is 10% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Prologis has a beta of 1.31, meaning that its share price is 31% more volatile than the broader market.

Host Hotels & Resorts pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Prologis pays an annual dividend of $4.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Host Hotels & Resorts pays out 54.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Prologis pays out 95.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Host Hotels & Resorts has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Prologis has increased its dividend for 12 consecutive years. Host Hotels & Resorts is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Prologis had 12 more articles in the media than Host Hotels & Resorts. MarketBeat recorded 35 mentions for Prologis and 23 mentions for Host Hotels & Resorts. Prologis' average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat Host Hotels & Resorts' score of 0.98 indicating that Prologis is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Prologis has higher revenue and earnings than Host Hotels & Resorts. Host Hotels & Resorts is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Prologis, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.