Go Pro
→ Porter flew 3,300 miles to investigate this system (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free IBKR Stock Alerts

Interactive Brokers Group (IBKR) Competitors

Interactive Brokers Group logo
$91.74 0.00 (0.00%)
Closing price 07/24/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$90.85 -0.89 (-0.97%)
As of 07/24/2026 07:34 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.
Compare

IBKR vs. COIN, HOOD, LPLA, NVDA, and TW

Should you buy Interactive Brokers Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Interactive Brokers Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Interactive Brokers Group include Coinbase Global (COIN), Robinhood Markets (HOOD), LPL Financial (LPLA), NVIDIA (NVDA), and Tradeweb Markets (TW).

How does Interactive Brokers Group compare to Coinbase Global?

Coinbase Global (NASDAQ:COIN) and Interactive Brokers Group (NASDAQ:IBKR) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Coinbase Global currently has a consensus target price of $239.14, indicating a potential upside of 51.07%. Interactive Brokers Group has a consensus target price of $96.89, indicating a potential upside of 5.61%. Given Coinbase Global's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Coinbase Global is more favorable than Interactive Brokers Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Coinbase Global
3 Sell rating(s)
12 Hold rating(s)
18 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.45
Interactive Brokers Group
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.92

Coinbase Global has a beta of 3.35, suggesting that its stock price is 235% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Interactive Brokers Group has a beta of 1.33, suggesting that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Coinbase Global had 51 more articles in the media than Interactive Brokers Group. MarketBeat recorded 76 mentions for Coinbase Global and 25 mentions for Interactive Brokers Group. Interactive Brokers Group's average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat Coinbase Global's score of 0.65 indicating that Interactive Brokers Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Coinbase Global
34 Very Positive mention(s)
13 Positive mention(s)
10 Neutral mention(s)
13 Negative mention(s)
3 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Interactive Brokers Group
12 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

68.8% of Coinbase Global shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.8% of Interactive Brokers Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.7% of Coinbase Global shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Interactive Brokers Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Coinbase Global has a net margin of 12.20% compared to Interactive Brokers Group's net margin of 9.94%. Interactive Brokers Group's return on equity of 5.37% beat Coinbase Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Coinbase Global12.20% 4.16% 2.07%
Interactive Brokers Group 9.94%5.37%0.52%

Coinbase Global has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Interactive Brokers Group. Interactive Brokers Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Coinbase Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Coinbase Global$7.18B5.81$1.26B$2.6659.51
Interactive Brokers Group$10.42B14.93$984M$2.5036.70

Summary

Coinbase Global beats Interactive Brokers Group on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Interactive Brokers Group compare to Robinhood Markets?

Robinhood Markets (NASDAQ:HOOD) and Interactive Brokers Group (NASDAQ:IBKR) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings and profitability.

Robinhood Markets has a beta of 2.33, indicating that its stock price is 133% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Interactive Brokers Group has a beta of 1.33, indicating that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Robinhood Markets had 39 more articles in the media than Interactive Brokers Group. MarketBeat recorded 64 mentions for Robinhood Markets and 25 mentions for Interactive Brokers Group. Interactive Brokers Group's average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat Robinhood Markets' score of 0.70 indicating that Interactive Brokers Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Robinhood Markets
29 Very Positive mention(s)
10 Positive mention(s)
15 Neutral mention(s)
4 Negative mention(s)
2 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Interactive Brokers Group
12 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Robinhood Markets currently has a consensus target price of $122.22, suggesting a potential upside of 28.77%. Interactive Brokers Group has a consensus target price of $96.89, suggesting a potential upside of 5.61%. Given Robinhood Markets' higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Robinhood Markets is more favorable than Interactive Brokers Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Robinhood Markets
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
21 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.81
Interactive Brokers Group
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.92

93.3% of Robinhood Markets shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.8% of Interactive Brokers Group shares are held by institutional investors. 13.5% of Robinhood Markets shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Interactive Brokers Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Robinhood Markets has a net margin of 41.12% compared to Interactive Brokers Group's net margin of 9.94%. Robinhood Markets' return on equity of 21.39% beat Interactive Brokers Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Robinhood Markets41.12% 21.39% 4.73%
Interactive Brokers Group 9.94%5.37%0.52%

Robinhood Markets has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Interactive Brokers Group. Interactive Brokers Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Robinhood Markets, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Robinhood Markets$4.47B19.11$1.88B$2.0745.85
Interactive Brokers Group$10.42B14.93$984M$2.5036.70

Summary

Robinhood Markets beats Interactive Brokers Group on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Interactive Brokers Group compare to LPL Financial?

Interactive Brokers Group (NASDAQ:IBKR) and LPL Financial (NASDAQ:LPLA) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends and valuation.

Interactive Brokers Group has a net margin of 9.94% compared to LPL Financial's net margin of 4.93%. LPL Financial's return on equity of 31.26% beat Interactive Brokers Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Interactive Brokers Group9.94% 5.37% 0.52%
LPL Financial 4.93%31.26%9.08%

Interactive Brokers Group presently has a consensus target price of $96.89, indicating a potential upside of 5.61%. LPL Financial has a consensus target price of $397.92, indicating a potential upside of 21.11%. Given LPL Financial's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe LPL Financial is more favorable than Interactive Brokers Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Interactive Brokers Group
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.92
LPL Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80

23.8% of Interactive Brokers Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.7% of LPL Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of Interactive Brokers Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of LPL Financial shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Interactive Brokers Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than LPL Financial. LPL Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Interactive Brokers Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Interactive Brokers Group$10.42B14.93$984M$2.5036.70
LPL Financial$16.99B1.55$863.02M$11.2029.33

Interactive Brokers Group pays an annual dividend of $0.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. LPL Financial pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Interactive Brokers Group pays out 14.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. LPL Financial pays out 10.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Interactive Brokers Group has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Interactive Brokers Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Interactive Brokers Group had 7 more articles in the media than LPL Financial. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Interactive Brokers Group and 18 mentions for LPL Financial. LPL Financial's average media sentiment score of 1.37 beat Interactive Brokers Group's score of 1.09 indicating that LPL Financial is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Interactive Brokers Group
12 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
LPL Financial
14 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Interactive Brokers Group has a beta of 1.33, suggesting that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, LPL Financial has a beta of 0.5, suggesting that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Interactive Brokers Group beats LPL Financial on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Interactive Brokers Group compare to NVIDIA?

Interactive Brokers Group (NASDAQ:IBKR) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) are related large-cap companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings, profitability, risk, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

In the previous week, NVIDIA had 303 more articles in the media than Interactive Brokers Group. MarketBeat recorded 328 mentions for NVIDIA and 25 mentions for Interactive Brokers Group. Interactive Brokers Group's average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat NVIDIA's score of 0.82 indicating that Interactive Brokers Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Interactive Brokers Group
12 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
NVIDIA
199 Very Positive mention(s)
46 Positive mention(s)
46 Neutral mention(s)
26 Negative mention(s)
9 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Interactive Brokers Group pays an annual dividend of $0.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. NVIDIA pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Interactive Brokers Group pays out 14.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 15.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Interactive Brokers Group has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and NVIDIA has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

NVIDIA has higher revenue and earnings than Interactive Brokers Group. NVIDIA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Interactive Brokers Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Interactive Brokers Group$10.42B14.93$984M$2.5036.70
NVIDIA$215.94B23.18$120.07B$6.5331.68

NVIDIA has a net margin of 62.97% compared to Interactive Brokers Group's net margin of 9.94%. NVIDIA's return on equity of 96.94% beat Interactive Brokers Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Interactive Brokers Group9.94% 5.37% 0.52%
NVIDIA 62.97%96.94%72.16%

Interactive Brokers Group has a beta of 1.33, meaning that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NVIDIA has a beta of 2.21, meaning that its stock price is 121% more volatile than the broader market.

23.8% of Interactive Brokers Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.3% of NVIDIA shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of Interactive Brokers Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of NVIDIA shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Interactive Brokers Group presently has a consensus target price of $96.89, suggesting a potential upside of 5.61%. NVIDIA has a consensus target price of $304.26, suggesting a potential upside of 47.10%. Given NVIDIA's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe NVIDIA is more favorable than Interactive Brokers Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Interactive Brokers Group
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.92
NVIDIA
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
48 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.02

Summary

NVIDIA beats Interactive Brokers Group on 16 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Interactive Brokers Group compare to Tradeweb Markets?

Tradeweb Markets (NASDAQ:TW) and Interactive Brokers Group (NASDAQ:IBKR) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Tradeweb Markets has a net margin of 40.25% compared to Interactive Brokers Group's net margin of 9.94%. Tradeweb Markets' return on equity of 12.43% beat Interactive Brokers Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tradeweb Markets40.25% 12.43% 10.75%
Interactive Brokers Group 9.94%5.37%0.52%

Tradeweb Markets has a beta of 0.62, indicating that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Interactive Brokers Group has a beta of 1.33, indicating that its share price is 33% more volatile than the broader market.

Tradeweb Markets pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Interactive Brokers Group pays an annual dividend of $0.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Tradeweb Markets pays out 13.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Interactive Brokers Group pays out 14.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Tradeweb Markets has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Interactive Brokers Group has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Tradeweb Markets is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Interactive Brokers Group has higher revenue and earnings than Tradeweb Markets. Tradeweb Markets is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Interactive Brokers Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tradeweb Markets$2.05B11.46$812.79M$4.0424.71
Interactive Brokers Group$10.42B14.93$984M$2.5036.70

In the previous week, Interactive Brokers Group had 22 more articles in the media than Tradeweb Markets. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Interactive Brokers Group and 3 mentions for Tradeweb Markets. Interactive Brokers Group's average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat Tradeweb Markets' score of 0.72 indicating that Interactive Brokers Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Tradeweb Markets
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Interactive Brokers Group
12 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

99.5% of Tradeweb Markets shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.8% of Interactive Brokers Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Tradeweb Markets shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Interactive Brokers Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Tradeweb Markets presently has a consensus price target of $130.58, indicating a potential upside of 30.81%. Interactive Brokers Group has a consensus price target of $96.89, indicating a potential upside of 5.61%. Given Tradeweb Markets' higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Tradeweb Markets is more favorable than Interactive Brokers Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Tradeweb Markets
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.54
Interactive Brokers Group
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.92

Summary

Interactive Brokers Group beats Tradeweb Markets on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Interactive Brokers Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for IBKR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding IBKR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

IBKR vs. The Competition

Export
MetricInteractive Brokers GroupFIN IndustryFinance SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$155.62B$124.14B$14.42B$12.20B
Dividend Yield0.38%1.63%5.71%9.80%
P/E Ratio36.7015.3320.6723.63
Price / Sales14.934.7145.7689.15
Price / Cash145.9919.9319.2546.67
Price / Book7.603.352.256.08
Net Income$984M$7.51B$1.14B$331.70M
7 Day Performance0.07%1.09%-0.08%-0.02%
1 Month Performance2.06%6.50%0.41%-2.60%
1 Year Performance40.06%6.56%12.27%13.91%

Interactive Brokers Group Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
IBKR
Interactive Brokers Group
4.6735 of 5 stars		$91.74
flat		$96.89
+5.6%		+40.1%$155.62B$10.42B36.703,182
COIN
Coinbase Global
4.1303 of 5 stars		$161.50
+2.6%		$246.36
+52.5%		-59.6%$41.46B$7.18B60.714,951
HOOD
Robinhood Markets
4.3861 of 5 stars		$113.45
+3.3%		$118.00
+4.0%		-9.5%$98.93B$4.47B54.812,900
LPLA
LPL Financial
4.7945 of 5 stars		$321.35
+0.1%		$397.92
+23.8%		-13.5%$25.68B$16.99B28.6910,000
NVDA
NVIDIA
4.9777 of 5 stars		$211.80
+4.1%		$304.26
+43.7%		+19.2%$4.93T$215.94B32.4342,000

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:IBKR) was last updated on 7/27/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your $29.97 book is free today
Why Some Traders Skip Stocks Entirely You don't need a big account to trade options. In fact, options ca...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
SPCX Warning - and Worst News for Stocks in 50 Years
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are now predicting what could be the worst news for the U.S. stock market in ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
BofA: Digital Dollar Coming 2025-2030
Bank of America just revealed your expiration date. In their Bloomberg interview, they didn't just predict the...
Decentralized Masters | Sponsoredtc pixel
Three oil giants buried the same discovery for 50 years
In 1976, Chevron tapped an energy source with no fuel costs, no carbon, and no supply chain - then killed the ...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel