Charles Schwab (SCHW) Competitors

Charles Schwab has a net margin of 37.99% compared to Interactive Brokers Group's net margin of 9.65%. Charles Schwab's return on equity of 23.05% beat Interactive Brokers Group's return on equity.

In the previous week, Charles Schwab had 31 more articles in the media than Interactive Brokers Group. MarketBeat recorded 41 mentions for Charles Schwab and 10 mentions for Interactive Brokers Group. Charles Schwab's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Interactive Brokers Group's score of 0.93 indicating that Charles Schwab is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Charles Schwab has higher revenue and earnings than Interactive Brokers Group. Charles Schwab is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Interactive Brokers Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

23.8% of Interactive Brokers Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.4% of Charles Schwab shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of Interactive Brokers Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.3% of Charles Schwab shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Interactive Brokers Group has a beta of 1.33, suggesting that its share price is 33% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Charles Schwab has a beta of 0.77, suggesting that its share price is 23% less volatile than the broader market.

Interactive Brokers Group currently has a consensus price target of $90.25, suggesting a potential downside of 3.54%. Charles Schwab has a consensus price target of $116.32, suggesting a potential upside of 13.53%. Given Charles Schwab's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Charles Schwab is more favorable than Interactive Brokers Group.

Interactive Brokers Group pays an annual dividend of $0.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Charles Schwab pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Interactive Brokers Group pays out 15.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Charles Schwab pays out 25.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Interactive Brokers Group has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Charles Schwab has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Charles Schwab has a beta of 0.77, indicating that its share price is 23% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, LPL Financial has a beta of 0.5, indicating that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

Charles Schwab has higher revenue and earnings than LPL Financial. Charles Schwab is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than LPL Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Charles Schwab pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. LPL Financial pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Charles Schwab pays out 25.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. LPL Financial pays out 10.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Charles Schwab has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Charles Schwab is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Charles Schwab had 8 more articles in the media than LPL Financial. MarketBeat recorded 41 mentions for Charles Schwab and 33 mentions for LPL Financial. Charles Schwab's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat LPL Financial's score of 0.78 indicating that Charles Schwab is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Charles Schwab has a net margin of 37.99% compared to LPL Financial's net margin of 4.93%. LPL Financial's return on equity of 31.26% beat Charles Schwab's return on equity.

84.4% of Charles Schwab shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.7% of LPL Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.3% of Charles Schwab shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of LPL Financial shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Charles Schwab currently has a consensus price target of $116.32, indicating a potential upside of 13.53%. LPL Financial has a consensus price target of $397.92, indicating a potential upside of 23.94%. Given LPL Financial's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe LPL Financial is more favorable than Charles Schwab.

Tradeweb Markets pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Charles Schwab pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Tradeweb Markets pays out 13.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Charles Schwab pays out 25.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Tradeweb Markets has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Charles Schwab has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Charles Schwab had 39 more articles in the media than Tradeweb Markets. MarketBeat recorded 41 mentions for Charles Schwab and 2 mentions for Tradeweb Markets. Charles Schwab's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Tradeweb Markets' score of 0.93 indicating that Charles Schwab is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

99.5% of Tradeweb Markets shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.4% of Charles Schwab shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Tradeweb Markets shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.3% of Charles Schwab shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Tradeweb Markets has a net margin of 40.25% compared to Charles Schwab's net margin of 37.99%. Charles Schwab's return on equity of 23.05% beat Tradeweb Markets' return on equity.

Charles Schwab has higher revenue and earnings than Tradeweb Markets. Charles Schwab is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tradeweb Markets, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Tradeweb Markets currently has a consensus price target of $132.08, suggesting a potential upside of 32.51%. Charles Schwab has a consensus price target of $116.32, suggesting a potential upside of 13.53%. Given Tradeweb Markets' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Tradeweb Markets is more favorable than Charles Schwab.

Tradeweb Markets has a beta of 0.62, suggesting that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Charles Schwab has a beta of 0.77, suggesting that its stock price is 23% less volatile than the broader market.

Bank of America presently has a consensus price target of $62.19, indicating a potential upside of 4.53%. Charles Schwab has a consensus price target of $116.32, indicating a potential upside of 13.53%. Given Charles Schwab's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Charles Schwab is more favorable than Bank of America.

Bank of America has higher revenue and earnings than Charles Schwab. Bank of America is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Charles Schwab, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

70.7% of Bank of America shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.4% of Charles Schwab shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Bank of America shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.3% of Charles Schwab shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Bank of America had 92 more articles in the media than Charles Schwab. MarketBeat recorded 133 mentions for Bank of America and 41 mentions for Charles Schwab. Charles Schwab's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Bank of America's score of 0.73 indicating that Charles Schwab is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Bank of America has a beta of 1.17, suggesting that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Charles Schwab has a beta of 0.77, suggesting that its stock price is 23% less volatile than the broader market.

Bank of America pays an annual dividend of $1.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Charles Schwab pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Bank of America pays out 27.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Charles Schwab pays out 25.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Bank of America has increased its dividend for 11 consecutive years and Charles Schwab has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Bank of America is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Charles Schwab has a net margin of 37.99% compared to Bank of America's net margin of 16.78%. Charles Schwab's return on equity of 23.05% beat Bank of America's return on equity.