Charles Schwab (SCHW) Competitors

Charles Schwab has a beta of 0.76, meaning that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Interactive Brokers Group has a beta of 1.34, meaning that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the broader market.

84.4% of Charles Schwab shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.8% of Interactive Brokers Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.3% of Charles Schwab shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Interactive Brokers Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Charles Schwab has a net margin of 38.79% compared to Interactive Brokers Group's net margin of 9.94%. Charles Schwab's return on equity of 24.53% beat Interactive Brokers Group's return on equity.

Charles Schwab has higher revenue and earnings than Interactive Brokers Group. Charles Schwab is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Interactive Brokers Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Charles Schwab had 29 more articles in the media than Interactive Brokers Group. MarketBeat recorded 37 mentions for Charles Schwab and 8 mentions for Interactive Brokers Group. Interactive Brokers Group's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Charles Schwab's score of 0.71 indicating that Interactive Brokers Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Charles Schwab pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Interactive Brokers Group pays an annual dividend of $0.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Charles Schwab pays out 23.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Interactive Brokers Group pays out 14.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Charles Schwab has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Interactive Brokers Group has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Charles Schwab currently has a consensus price target of $121.17, indicating a potential upside of 7.84%. Interactive Brokers Group has a consensus price target of $96.89, indicating a potential upside of 3.22%. Given Charles Schwab's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Charles Schwab is more favorable than Interactive Brokers Group.

Charles Schwab pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. LPL Financial pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Charles Schwab pays out 23.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. LPL Financial pays out 9.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Charles Schwab has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Charles Schwab is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Charles Schwab has a net margin of 38.79% compared to LPL Financial's net margin of 5.13%. LPL Financial's return on equity of 32.20% beat Charles Schwab's return on equity.

Charles Schwab has a beta of 0.76, meaning that its share price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, LPL Financial has a beta of 0.48, meaning that its share price is 52% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Charles Schwab had 12 more articles in the media than LPL Financial. MarketBeat recorded 37 mentions for Charles Schwab and 25 mentions for LPL Financial. LPL Financial's average media sentiment score of 1.34 beat Charles Schwab's score of 0.71 indicating that LPL Financial is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Charles Schwab presently has a consensus target price of $121.17, suggesting a potential upside of 7.84%. LPL Financial has a consensus target price of $406.69, suggesting a potential upside of 12.55%. Given LPL Financial's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe LPL Financial is more favorable than Charles Schwab.

Charles Schwab has higher revenue and earnings than LPL Financial. Charles Schwab is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than LPL Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

84.4% of Charles Schwab shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.7% of LPL Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.3% of Charles Schwab shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of LPL Financial shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

84.4% of Charles Schwab shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.5% of Tradeweb Markets shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.3% of Charles Schwab shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Tradeweb Markets shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Tradeweb Markets has a net margin of 40.66% compared to Charles Schwab's net margin of 38.79%. Charles Schwab's return on equity of 24.53% beat Tradeweb Markets' return on equity.

In the previous week, Charles Schwab had 34 more articles in the media than Tradeweb Markets. MarketBeat recorded 37 mentions for Charles Schwab and 3 mentions for Tradeweb Markets. Charles Schwab's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Tradeweb Markets' score of -0.86 indicating that Charles Schwab is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Charles Schwab has higher revenue and earnings than Tradeweb Markets. Charles Schwab is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tradeweb Markets, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Charles Schwab presently has a consensus price target of $121.17, indicating a potential upside of 7.84%. Tradeweb Markets has a consensus price target of $133.42, indicating a potential upside of 24.64%. Given Tradeweb Markets' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Tradeweb Markets is more favorable than Charles Schwab.

Charles Schwab has a beta of 0.76, indicating that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tradeweb Markets has a beta of 0.62, indicating that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

Charles Schwab pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Tradeweb Markets pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Charles Schwab pays out 23.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Tradeweb Markets pays out 13.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Charles Schwab has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Tradeweb Markets has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

Bank of America pays an annual dividend of $1.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Charles Schwab pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Bank of America pays out 25.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Charles Schwab pays out 23.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Bank of America has increased its dividend for 11 consecutive years and Charles Schwab has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Bank of America is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Bank of America has a beta of 1.17, suggesting that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Charles Schwab has a beta of 0.76, suggesting that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

Bank of America has higher revenue and earnings than Charles Schwab. Bank of America is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Charles Schwab, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

70.7% of Bank of America shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.4% of Charles Schwab shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Bank of America shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.3% of Charles Schwab shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Charles Schwab has a net margin of 38.79% compared to Bank of America's net margin of 17.56%. Charles Schwab's return on equity of 24.53% beat Bank of America's return on equity.

In the previous week, Bank of America had 120 more articles in the media than Charles Schwab. MarketBeat recorded 157 mentions for Bank of America and 37 mentions for Charles Schwab. Bank of America's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Charles Schwab's score of 0.71 indicating that Bank of America is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Bank of America presently has a consensus price target of $64.08, suggesting a potential upside of 3.81%. Charles Schwab has a consensus price target of $121.17, suggesting a potential upside of 7.84%. Given Charles Schwab's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Charles Schwab is more favorable than Bank of America.