Charles Schwab (SCHW) Competitors

In the previous week, Charles Schwab had 11 more articles in the media than Interactive Brokers Group. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Charles Schwab and 12 mentions for Interactive Brokers Group. Charles Schwab's average media sentiment score of 0.36 beat Interactive Brokers Group's score of 0.18 indicating that Charles Schwab is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Charles Schwab has a net margin of 38.79% compared to Interactive Brokers Group's net margin of 9.94%. Charles Schwab's return on equity of 24.53% beat Interactive Brokers Group's return on equity.

Charles Schwab has higher revenue and earnings than Interactive Brokers Group. Charles Schwab is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Interactive Brokers Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Interactive Brokers Group pays an annual dividend of $0.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Charles Schwab pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Interactive Brokers Group pays out 14.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Charles Schwab pays out 23.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Interactive Brokers Group has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Charles Schwab has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Interactive Brokers Group has a beta of 1.37, suggesting that its share price is 37% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Charles Schwab has a beta of 0.79, suggesting that its share price is 21% less volatile than the broader market.

Interactive Brokers Group presently has a consensus price target of $99.00, suggesting a potential upside of 12.28%. Charles Schwab has a consensus price target of $119.37, suggesting a potential upside of 23.30%. Given Charles Schwab's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Charles Schwab is more favorable than Interactive Brokers Group.

23.8% of Interactive Brokers Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.4% of Charles Schwab shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of Interactive Brokers Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.3% of Charles Schwab shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

LPL Financial has a beta of 0.54, meaning that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Charles Schwab has a beta of 0.79, meaning that its share price is 21% less volatile than the broader market.

LPL Financial pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Charles Schwab pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. LPL Financial pays out 9.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Charles Schwab pays out 23.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Charles Schwab has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Charles Schwab is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

95.7% of LPL Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.4% of Charles Schwab shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of LPL Financial shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.3% of Charles Schwab shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Charles Schwab has a net margin of 38.79% compared to LPL Financial's net margin of 5.13%. LPL Financial's return on equity of 32.20% beat Charles Schwab's return on equity.

Charles Schwab has higher revenue and earnings than LPL Financial. Charles Schwab is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than LPL Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

LPL Financial currently has a consensus price target of $403.79, indicating a potential upside of 28.77%. Charles Schwab has a consensus price target of $119.37, indicating a potential upside of 23.30%. Given LPL Financial's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe LPL Financial is more favorable than Charles Schwab.

In the previous week, Charles Schwab had 18 more articles in the media than LPL Financial. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Charles Schwab and 5 mentions for LPL Financial. LPL Financial's average media sentiment score of 0.39 beat Charles Schwab's score of 0.36 indicating that LPL Financial is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Tradeweb Markets presently has a consensus price target of $130.45, suggesting a potential upside of 26.18%. Charles Schwab has a consensus price target of $119.37, suggesting a potential upside of 23.30%. Given Tradeweb Markets' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Tradeweb Markets is more favorable than Charles Schwab.

Charles Schwab has higher revenue and earnings than Tradeweb Markets. Charles Schwab is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tradeweb Markets, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Charles Schwab had 22 more articles in the media than Tradeweb Markets. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Charles Schwab and 1 mentions for Tradeweb Markets. Tradeweb Markets' average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Charles Schwab's score of 0.36 indicating that Tradeweb Markets is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Tradeweb Markets has a net margin of 40.66% compared to Charles Schwab's net margin of 38.79%. Charles Schwab's return on equity of 24.53% beat Tradeweb Markets' return on equity.

Tradeweb Markets has a beta of 0.61, suggesting that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Charles Schwab has a beta of 0.79, suggesting that its share price is 21% less volatile than the broader market.

99.5% of Tradeweb Markets shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.4% of Charles Schwab shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Tradeweb Markets shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.3% of Charles Schwab shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Tradeweb Markets pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Charles Schwab pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Tradeweb Markets pays out 13.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Charles Schwab pays out 23.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Tradeweb Markets has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Charles Schwab has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Charles Schwab has a net margin of 38.79% compared to Bank of America's net margin of 17.56%. Charles Schwab's return on equity of 24.53% beat Bank of America's return on equity.

Charles Schwab presently has a consensus target price of $119.37, suggesting a potential upside of 23.30%. Bank of America has a consensus target price of $64.17, suggesting a potential upside of 20.09%. Given Charles Schwab's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Charles Schwab is more favorable than Bank of America.

84.4% of Charles Schwab shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.7% of Bank of America shares are held by institutional investors. 6.3% of Charles Schwab shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Bank of America shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Bank of America has higher revenue and earnings than Charles Schwab. Bank of America is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Charles Schwab, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Bank of America had 70 more articles in the media than Charles Schwab. MarketBeat recorded 93 mentions for Bank of America and 23 mentions for Charles Schwab. Bank of America's average media sentiment score of 0.41 beat Charles Schwab's score of 0.36 indicating that Bank of America is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Charles Schwab pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Bank of America pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Charles Schwab pays out 23.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Bank of America pays out 29.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Charles Schwab has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Bank of America has increased its dividend for 11 consecutive years. Bank of America is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Charles Schwab has a beta of 0.79, suggesting that its share price is 21% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bank of America has a beta of 1.21, suggesting that its share price is 21% more volatile than the broader market.