Free Trial

InflaRx (IFRX) Competitors

InflaRx logo
$1.62 -0.04 (-2.41%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$1.63 +0.01 (+0.62%)
As of 07:25 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

IFRX vs. CABA, ALT, DNA, ZSQR, and VALN

Should you buy InflaRx stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares InflaRx with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with InflaRx include Cabaletta Bio (CABA), Altimmune (ALT), Ginkgo Bioworks (DNA), Coeptis Therapeutics (ZSQR), and Valneva (VALN). These companies are all part of the "pharmaceutical products" industry.

How does InflaRx compare to Cabaletta Bio?

Cabaletta Bio (NASDAQ:CABA) and InflaRx (NASDAQ:IFRX) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Cabaletta Bio has a beta of 3.21, indicating that its stock price is 221% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, InflaRx has a beta of 2.42, indicating that its stock price is 142% more volatile than the broader market.

InflaRx's return on equity of -88.30% beat Cabaletta Bio's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cabaletta BioN/A -131.58% -96.46%
InflaRx N/A -88.30%-65.77%

InflaRx has higher revenue and earnings than Cabaletta Bio. InflaRx is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cabaletta Bio, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cabaletta BioN/AN/A-$167.86M-$1.96N/A
InflaRx$30K3,903.66-$51.63M-$0.71N/A

42.4% of InflaRx shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.4% of Cabaletta Bio shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.3% of InflaRx shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Cabaletta Bio presently has a consensus target price of $15.50, indicating a potential upside of 409.87%. InflaRx has a consensus target price of $7.00, indicating a potential upside of 332.10%. Given Cabaletta Bio's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Cabaletta Bio is more favorable than InflaRx.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cabaletta Bio
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57
InflaRx
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71

In the previous week, Cabaletta Bio had 5 more articles in the media than InflaRx. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Cabaletta Bio and 2 mentions for InflaRx. InflaRx's average media sentiment score of 1.79 beat Cabaletta Bio's score of 0.37 indicating that InflaRx is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Cabaletta Bio
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
InflaRx
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Summary

InflaRx beats Cabaletta Bio on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does InflaRx compare to Altimmune?

InflaRx (NASDAQ:IFRX) and Altimmune (NASDAQ:ALT) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Altimmune had 4 more articles in the media than InflaRx. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Altimmune and 2 mentions for InflaRx. InflaRx's average media sentiment score of 1.79 beat Altimmune's score of 0.56 indicating that InflaRx is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
InflaRx
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Altimmune
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

InflaRx has a beta of 2.42, suggesting that its stock price is 142% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Altimmune has a beta of 0.21, suggesting that its stock price is 79% less volatile than the broader market.

InflaRx has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Altimmune's net margin of -214,860.98%. Altimmune's return on equity of -42.57% beat InflaRx's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
InflaRxN/A -88.30% -65.77%
Altimmune -214,860.98%-42.57%-35.57%

InflaRx presently has a consensus price target of $7.00, indicating a potential upside of 332.10%. Altimmune has a consensus price target of $16.67, indicating a potential upside of 538.57%. Given Altimmune's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Altimmune is more favorable than InflaRx.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
InflaRx
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71
Altimmune
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

42.4% of InflaRx shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 78.1% of Altimmune shares are held by institutional investors. 16.3% of InflaRx shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Altimmune shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

InflaRx has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Altimmune. Altimmune is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than InflaRx, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
InflaRx$30K3,903.66-$51.63M-$0.71N/A
Altimmune$40K12,689.17-$88.09M-$0.93N/A

Summary

InflaRx and Altimmune tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does InflaRx compare to Ginkgo Bioworks?

Ginkgo Bioworks (NYSE:DNA) and InflaRx (NASDAQ:IFRX) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership and earnings.

Ginkgo Bioworks currently has a consensus price target of $8.50, suggesting a potential upside of 6.68%. InflaRx has a consensus price target of $7.00, suggesting a potential upside of 332.10%. Given InflaRx's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe InflaRx is more favorable than Ginkgo Bioworks.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ginkgo Bioworks
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67
InflaRx
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71

InflaRx has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Ginkgo Bioworks' net margin of -215.41%. Ginkgo Bioworks' return on equity of -56.08% beat InflaRx's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ginkgo Bioworks-215.41% -56.08% -26.06%
InflaRx N/A -88.30%-65.77%

InflaRx has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Ginkgo Bioworks. InflaRx is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ginkgo Bioworks, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ginkgo Bioworks$170.15M3.06-$312.76M-$5.36N/A
InflaRx$30K3,903.66-$51.63M-$0.71N/A

Ginkgo Bioworks has a beta of 1.79, suggesting that its stock price is 79% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, InflaRx has a beta of 2.42, suggesting that its stock price is 142% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Ginkgo Bioworks and Ginkgo Bioworks both had 2 articles in the media. InflaRx's average media sentiment score of 1.79 beat Ginkgo Bioworks' score of 0.83 indicating that InflaRx is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Ginkgo Bioworks
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
InflaRx
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

78.6% of Ginkgo Bioworks shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.4% of InflaRx shares are held by institutional investors. 12.7% of Ginkgo Bioworks shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 16.3% of InflaRx shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

InflaRx beats Ginkgo Bioworks on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does InflaRx compare to Coeptis Therapeutics?

Coeptis Therapeutics (NASDAQ:ZSQR) and InflaRx (NASDAQ:IFRX) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, dividends and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Coeptis Therapeutics had 1 more articles in the media than InflaRx. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Coeptis Therapeutics and 2 mentions for InflaRx. InflaRx's average media sentiment score of 1.79 beat Coeptis Therapeutics' score of 0.62 indicating that InflaRx is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Coeptis Therapeutics
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
InflaRx
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

13.9% of Coeptis Therapeutics shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.4% of InflaRx shares are held by institutional investors. 24.3% of Coeptis Therapeutics shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.3% of InflaRx shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Coeptis Therapeutics has higher revenue and earnings than InflaRx. Coeptis Therapeutics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than InflaRx, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Coeptis Therapeutics$1.36M392.91-$11.92M-$2.52N/A
InflaRx$30K3,903.66-$51.63M-$0.71N/A

InflaRx has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Coeptis Therapeutics' net margin of -810.04%. InflaRx's return on equity of -88.30% beat Coeptis Therapeutics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Coeptis Therapeutics-810.04% -92.29% -73.52%
InflaRx N/A -88.30%-65.77%

Coeptis Therapeutics has a beta of -0.22, suggesting that its share price is 122% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, InflaRx has a beta of 2.42, suggesting that its share price is 142% more volatile than the broader market.

InflaRx has a consensus target price of $7.00, suggesting a potential upside of 332.10%. Given InflaRx's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe InflaRx is more favorable than Coeptis Therapeutics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Coeptis Therapeutics
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
InflaRx
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71

Summary

InflaRx beats Coeptis Therapeutics on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does InflaRx compare to Valneva?

Valneva (NASDAQ:VALN) and InflaRx (NASDAQ:IFRX) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, risk and dividends.

InflaRx has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Valneva's net margin of -88.87%. InflaRx's return on equity of -88.30% beat Valneva's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Valneva-88.87% -107.63% -33.02%
InflaRx N/A -88.30%-65.77%

Valneva presently has a consensus price target of $11.98, indicating a potential upside of 127.66%. InflaRx has a consensus price target of $7.00, indicating a potential upside of 332.10%. Given InflaRx's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe InflaRx is more favorable than Valneva.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Valneva
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.20
InflaRx
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71

InflaRx has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Valneva. Valneva is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than InflaRx, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Valneva$197.56M2.53-$130.33M-$1.87N/A
InflaRx$30K3,903.66-$51.63M-$0.71N/A

In the previous week, Valneva and Valneva both had 2 articles in the media. InflaRx's average media sentiment score of 1.79 beat Valneva's score of 0.82 indicating that InflaRx is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Valneva
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
InflaRx
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

11.4% of Valneva shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.4% of InflaRx shares are held by institutional investors. 14.9% of Valneva shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.3% of InflaRx shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valneva has a beta of 1.75, indicating that its share price is 75% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, InflaRx has a beta of 2.42, indicating that its share price is 142% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

InflaRx beats Valneva on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get InflaRx News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for IFRX and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding IFRX and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

IFRX vs. The Competition

MetricInflaRxMED IndustryMedical SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$120.01M$3.28B$6.41B$11.71B
Dividend YieldN/A2.33%2.67%5.55%
P/E RatioN/A18.9924.4623.62
Price / Sales3,903.66290.48500.50105.26
Price / CashN/A118.2442.3656.09
Price / Book2.498.0010.436.70
Net Income-$51.63M$23.89M$3.56B$337.26M
7 Day Performance-21.36%-3.49%-1.39%-1.41%
1 Month Performance-37.21%1.03%0.86%1.15%
1 Year Performance92.86%34.39%19.42%22.61%

InflaRx Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
IFRX
InflaRx
2.8697 of 5 stars
$1.62
-2.4%
$7.00
+332.1%
+95.3%$120.01M$30KN/A60
CABA
Cabaletta Bio
2.6537 of 5 stars
$3.24
-7.8%
$15.50
+379.1%
+35.9%$527.48MN/AN/A50
ALT
Altimmune
2.0311 of 5 stars
$2.70
-7.7%
$16.67
+518.4%
-55.3%$524.11M$36KN/A50
DNA
Ginkgo Bioworks
0.9951 of 5 stars
$7.98
-11.8%
$8.50
+6.5%
+5.2%$522.53M$151.40MN/A640
ZSQR
Coeptis Therapeutics
0.3942 of 5 stars
$10.05
-7.7%
N/A+18.1%$516.87M$1.36MN/A2

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:IFRX) was last updated on 6/10/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners