Manhattan Bridge Capital Competitors

Manhattan Bridge Capital (NASDAQ:LOAN) and Cedar Realty Trust (NYSE:CDR) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

Dividends

Manhattan Bridge Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.9%. Cedar Realty Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Cedar Realty Trust pays out 8.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Manhattan Bridge Capital has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Cedar Realty Trust has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Manhattan Bridge Capital and Cedar Realty Trust's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Manhattan Bridge Capital has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Cedar Realty Trust.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Manhattan Bridge Capital and Cedar Realty Trust, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Manhattan Bridge Capital presently has a consensus price target of $6.00, suggesting a potential downside of 5.66%. Cedar Realty Trust has a consensus price target of $19.00, suggesting a potential upside of 28.38%. Given Cedar Realty Trust's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Cedar Realty Trust is more favorable than Manhattan Bridge Capital.

Profitability

This table compares Manhattan Bridge Capital and Cedar Realty Trust's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk & Volatility

Manhattan Bridge Capital has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its share price is 29% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cedar Realty Trust has a beta of 1.49, meaning that its share price is 49% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

14.4% of Manhattan Bridge Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 28.7% of Manhattan Bridge Capital shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.7% of Cedar Realty Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Manhattan Bridge Capital beats Cedar Realty Trust on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Manhattan Bridge Capital (NASDAQ:LOAN) and Western Asset Mortgage Capital (NYSE:WMC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Dividends

Manhattan Bridge Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.9%. Western Asset Mortgage Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.6%. Western Asset Mortgage Capital pays out 19.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Manhattan Bridge Capital has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Western Asset Mortgage Capital has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Manhattan Bridge Capital and Western Asset Mortgage Capital's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Western Asset Mortgage Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Manhattan Bridge Capital.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Manhattan Bridge Capital and Western Asset Mortgage Capital, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Manhattan Bridge Capital currently has a consensus target price of $6.00, indicating a potential downside of 5.66%. Western Asset Mortgage Capital has a consensus target price of $2.00, indicating a potential downside of 36.51%. Given Manhattan Bridge Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Manhattan Bridge Capital is more favorable than Western Asset Mortgage Capital.

Profitability

This table compares Manhattan Bridge Capital and Western Asset Mortgage Capital's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

Manhattan Bridge Capital has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Western Asset Mortgage Capital has a beta of 1.62, meaning that its stock price is 62% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

14.4% of Manhattan Bridge Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.3% of Western Asset Mortgage Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 28.7% of Manhattan Bridge Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Western Asset Mortgage Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Manhattan Bridge Capital beats Western Asset Mortgage Capital on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Manhattan Bridge Capital (NASDAQ:LOAN) and Transcontinental Realty Investors (NYSE:TCI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Manhattan Bridge Capital and Transcontinental Realty Investors' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Manhattan Bridge Capital has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Transcontinental Realty Investors.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Manhattan Bridge Capital and Transcontinental Realty Investors, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Manhattan Bridge Capital currently has a consensus target price of $6.00, indicating a potential downside of 5.66%. Given Manhattan Bridge Capital's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Manhattan Bridge Capital is more favorable than Transcontinental Realty Investors.

Profitability

This table compares Manhattan Bridge Capital and Transcontinental Realty Investors' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

Manhattan Bridge Capital has a beta of 0.71, suggesting that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Transcontinental Realty Investors has a beta of 0.79, suggesting that its stock price is 21% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

14.4% of Manhattan Bridge Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.1% of Transcontinental Realty Investors shares are held by institutional investors. 28.7% of Manhattan Bridge Capital shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 84.8% of Transcontinental Realty Investors shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Manhattan Bridge Capital beats Transcontinental Realty Investors on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Manhattan Bridge Capital (NASDAQ:LOAN) and AG Mortgage Investment Trust (NYSE:MITT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Dividends

Manhattan Bridge Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.9%. AG Mortgage Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. Manhattan Bridge Capital has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and AG Mortgage Investment Trust has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Manhattan Bridge Capital and AG Mortgage Investment Trust's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

AG Mortgage Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Manhattan Bridge Capital.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Manhattan Bridge Capital and AG Mortgage Investment Trust, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Manhattan Bridge Capital currently has a consensus target price of $6.00, indicating a potential downside of 5.66%. AG Mortgage Investment Trust has a consensus target price of $2.75, indicating a potential downside of 32.10%. Given Manhattan Bridge Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Manhattan Bridge Capital is more favorable than AG Mortgage Investment Trust.

Profitability

This table compares Manhattan Bridge Capital and AG Mortgage Investment Trust's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

Manhattan Bridge Capital has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, AG Mortgage Investment Trust has a beta of 1.68, meaning that its stock price is 68% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

14.4% of Manhattan Bridge Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.3% of AG Mortgage Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 28.7% of Manhattan Bridge Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of AG Mortgage Investment Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Manhattan Bridge Capital beats AG Mortgage Investment Trust on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Manhattan Bridge Capital (NASDAQ:LOAN) and CIM Commercial Trust (NASDAQ:CMCT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Dividends

Manhattan Bridge Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.9%. CIM Commercial Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. CIM Commercial Trust pays out -60.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Manhattan Bridge Capital has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and CIM Commercial Trust has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Manhattan Bridge Capital and CIM Commercial Trust's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

CIM Commercial Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Manhattan Bridge Capital.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Manhattan Bridge Capital and CIM Commercial Trust, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Manhattan Bridge Capital currently has a consensus target price of $6.00, indicating a potential downside of 5.66%. Given Manhattan Bridge Capital's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Manhattan Bridge Capital is more favorable than CIM Commercial Trust.

Profitability

This table compares Manhattan Bridge Capital and CIM Commercial Trust's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

Manhattan Bridge Capital has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CIM Commercial Trust has a beta of 0.84, meaning that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

14.4% of Manhattan Bridge Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.3% of CIM Commercial Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 28.7% of Manhattan Bridge Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.4% of CIM Commercial Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Manhattan Bridge Capital beats CIM Commercial Trust on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Manhattan Bridge Capital (NASDAQ:LOAN) and Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment (NYSE:CHMI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Dividends

Manhattan Bridge Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.9%. Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.3%. Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment pays out 53.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Manhattan Bridge Capital has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Manhattan Bridge Capital and Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Manhattan Bridge Capital has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Manhattan Bridge Capital and Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Manhattan Bridge Capital currently has a consensus target price of $6.00, indicating a potential downside of 5.66%. Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment has a consensus target price of $11.1250, indicating a potential upside of 16.74%. Given Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment is more favorable than Manhattan Bridge Capital.

Profitability

This table compares Manhattan Bridge Capital and Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

Manhattan Bridge Capital has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment has a beta of 1.14, meaning that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

14.4% of Manhattan Bridge Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.7% of Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. 28.7% of Manhattan Bridge Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Manhattan Bridge Capital beats Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.