Do analysts prefer FSM or MAKO?

Fortuna Mining currently has a consensus target price of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 15.89%. Given Fortuna Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Fortuna Mining is more favorable than Mako Mining. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Fortuna Mining 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.60 Mako Mining 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50

Which has higher earnings & valuation, FSM or MAKO?

Fortuna Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Mako Mining. Fortuna Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mako Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Fortuna Mining $947.06M 3.78 $287.47M $1.18 10.24 Mako Mining $148.47M 6.22 $33.74M $0.41 25.71

Does the media refer more to FSM or MAKO?

In the previous week, Fortuna Mining had 4 more articles in the media than Mako Mining. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Fortuna Mining and 2 mentions for Mako Mining. Fortuna Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat Mako Mining's score of 0.63 indicating that Fortuna Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Fortuna Mining 4 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Mako Mining 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer SA or MAKO?

Seabridge Gold currently has a consensus target price of $40.00, suggesting a potential upside of 33.47%. Given Seabridge Gold's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Seabridge Gold is more favorable than Mako Mining. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Seabridge Gold 2 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.67 Mako Mining 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50

Does the media refer more to SA or MAKO?

In the previous week, Seabridge Gold had 4 more articles in the media than Mako Mining. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Seabridge Gold and 2 mentions for Mako Mining. Seabridge Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Mako Mining's score of 0.63 indicating that Seabridge Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Seabridge Gold 3 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Mako Mining 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate AAUC or MAKO?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Allied Gold 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50 Mako Mining 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50

Is AAUC or MAKO more profitable?

Mako Mining has a net margin of 25.11% compared to Allied Gold's net margin of -4.19%. Allied Gold's return on equity of 41.36% beat Mako Mining's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Allied Gold -4.19% 41.36% 10.00% Mako Mining 25.11% 34.25% 22.57%

Does the media prefer AAUC or MAKO?

In the previous week, Allied Gold had 7 more articles in the media than Mako Mining. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Allied Gold and 2 mentions for Mako Mining. Mako Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Allied Gold's score of 0.60 indicating that Mako Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Allied Gold 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Mako Mining 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate MAKO or PPTA?

Perpetua Resources has a consensus price target of $35.90, suggesting a potential upside of 39.69%. Given Perpetua Resources' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Perpetua Resources is more favorable than Mako Mining. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Mako Mining 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50 Perpetua Resources 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50

Does the media favor MAKO or PPTA?

In the previous week, Perpetua Resources had 12 more articles in the media than Mako Mining. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Perpetua Resources and 2 mentions for Mako Mining. Mako Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Perpetua Resources' score of 0.37 indicating that Mako Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Mako Mining 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Perpetua Resources 4 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts rate MAKO or DRD?

DRDGOLD has a consensus target price of $35.00, indicating a potential upside of 14.27%. Given DRDGOLD's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe DRDGOLD is more favorable than Mako Mining. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Mako Mining 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50 DRDGOLD 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, MAKO or DRD?

DRDGOLD has higher revenue and earnings than Mako Mining. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Mako Mining $148.47M 6.22 $33.74M $0.41 25.71 DRDGOLD $676.84M 3.91 $123.57M N/A N/A

Is MAKO or DRD more profitable?

Mako Mining has a net margin of 25.11% compared to DRDGOLD's net margin of 0.00%. Mako Mining's return on equity of 34.25% beat DRDGOLD's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Mako Mining 25.11% 34.25% 22.57% DRDGOLD N/A N/A N/A

Does the media prefer MAKO or DRD?

In the previous week, DRDGOLD had 9 more articles in the media than Mako Mining. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for DRDGOLD and 2 mentions for Mako Mining. Mako Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat DRDGOLD's score of 0.60 indicating that Mako Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Mako Mining 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive DRDGOLD 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 3 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Mako Mining (MAKO) Competitors

$10.54 +0.04 (+0.38%)

As of 08/21/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Compare

MAKO vs. FSM, SA, AAUC, PPTA, and DRD

Should you buy Mako Mining stock or one of its competitors? Mako Mining's main competitors and comparable companies include Fortuna Mining (FSM), Seabridge Gold (SA), Allied Gold (AAUC), Perpetua Resources (PPTA), and DRDGOLD (DRD). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "gold" industry.

How does Mako Mining compare to Fortuna Mining?

Fortuna Mining (NYSE:FSM) and Mako Mining (NASDAQ:MAKO) are both materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and profitability.

33.8% of Fortuna Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Fortuna Mining shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.1% of Mako Mining shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Fortuna Mining currently has a consensus target price of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 15.89%. Given Fortuna Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Fortuna Mining is more favorable than Mako Mining.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Fortuna Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.60
Mako Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Fortuna Mining has a net margin of 31.99% compared to Mako Mining's net margin of 25.11%. Mako Mining's return on equity of 34.25% beat Fortuna Mining's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Fortuna Mining	31.99%	17.48%	12.88%
Mako Mining	25.11%	34.25%	22.57%

Fortuna Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Mako Mining. Fortuna Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mako Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Fortuna Mining	$947.06M	3.78	$287.47M	$1.18	10.24
Mako Mining	$148.47M	6.22	$33.74M	$0.41	25.71

In the previous week, Fortuna Mining had 4 more articles in the media than Mako Mining. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Fortuna Mining and 2 mentions for Mako Mining. Fortuna Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat Mako Mining's score of 0.63 indicating that Fortuna Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Fortuna Mining	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Mako Mining	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Fortuna Mining beats Mako Mining on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mako Mining compare to Seabridge Gold?

Seabridge Gold (NYSE:SA) and Mako Mining (NASDAQ:MAKO) are both materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, institutional ownership and profitability.

Seabridge Gold currently has a consensus target price of $40.00, suggesting a potential upside of 33.47%. Given Seabridge Gold's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Seabridge Gold is more favorable than Mako Mining.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Seabridge Gold	2 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.67
Mako Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Mako Mining has a net margin of 25.11% compared to Seabridge Gold's net margin of 0.00%. Mako Mining's return on equity of 34.25% beat Seabridge Gold's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Seabridge Gold	N/A	-6.38%	-4.06%
Mako Mining	25.11%	34.25%	22.57%

In the previous week, Seabridge Gold had 4 more articles in the media than Mako Mining. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Seabridge Gold and 2 mentions for Mako Mining. Seabridge Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Mako Mining's score of 0.63 indicating that Seabridge Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Seabridge Gold	3 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Mako Mining	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Mako Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Seabridge Gold. Seabridge Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mako Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Seabridge Gold	N/A	N/A	-$38.06M	-$0.48	N/A
Mako Mining	$148.47M	6.22	$33.74M	$0.41	25.71

34.8% of Seabridge Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 12.8% of Seabridge Gold shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 15.1% of Mako Mining shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Mako Mining beats Seabridge Gold on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mako Mining compare to Allied Gold?

Allied Gold (NYSE:AAUC) and Mako Mining (NASDAQ:MAKO) are both materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, earnings and institutional ownership.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Allied Gold	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Mako Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Mako Mining has a net margin of 25.11% compared to Allied Gold's net margin of -4.19%. Allied Gold's return on equity of 41.36% beat Mako Mining's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Allied Gold	-4.19%	41.36%	10.00%
Mako Mining	25.11%	34.25%	22.57%

In the previous week, Allied Gold had 7 more articles in the media than Mako Mining. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Allied Gold and 2 mentions for Mako Mining. Mako Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Allied Gold's score of 0.60 indicating that Mako Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Allied Gold	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Mako Mining	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Mako Mining has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Allied Gold. Allied Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mako Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Allied Gold	$1.49B	2.20	-$51.85M	-$0.54	N/A
Mako Mining	$148.47M	6.22	$33.74M	$0.41	25.71

Summary

Mako Mining beats Allied Gold on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mako Mining compare to Perpetua Resources?

Mako Mining (NASDAQ:MAKO) and Perpetua Resources (NASDAQ:PPTA) are both materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and dividends.

In the previous week, Perpetua Resources had 12 more articles in the media than Mako Mining. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Perpetua Resources and 2 mentions for Mako Mining. Mako Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Perpetua Resources' score of 0.37 indicating that Mako Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Mako Mining	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Perpetua Resources	4 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Mako Mining has a net margin of 25.11% compared to Perpetua Resources' net margin of 0.00%. Mako Mining's return on equity of 34.25% beat Perpetua Resources' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Mako Mining	25.11%	34.25%	22.57%
Perpetua Resources	N/A	-31.73%	-30.46%

Perpetua Resources has a consensus price target of $35.90, suggesting a potential upside of 39.69%. Given Perpetua Resources' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Perpetua Resources is more favorable than Mako Mining.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Mako Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Perpetua Resources	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

70.1% of Perpetua Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.1% of Mako Mining shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Perpetua Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Mako Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Perpetua Resources. Perpetua Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mako Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Mako Mining	$148.47M	6.22	$33.74M	$0.41	25.71
Perpetua Resources	N/A	N/A	-$100.39M	-$2.02	N/A

Summary

Mako Mining beats Perpetua Resources on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mako Mining compare to DRDGOLD?

Mako Mining (NASDAQ:MAKO) and DRDGOLD (NYSE:DRD) are both materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, risk and analyst recommendations.

DRDGOLD has a consensus target price of $35.00, indicating a potential upside of 14.27%. Given DRDGOLD's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe DRDGOLD is more favorable than Mako Mining.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Mako Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
DRDGOLD	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

14.7% of DRDGOLD shares are held by institutional investors. 15.1% of Mako Mining shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of DRDGOLD shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, DRDGOLD had 9 more articles in the media than Mako Mining. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for DRDGOLD and 2 mentions for Mako Mining. Mako Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat DRDGOLD's score of 0.60 indicating that Mako Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Mako Mining	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
DRDGOLD	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Mako Mining has a net margin of 25.11% compared to DRDGOLD's net margin of 0.00%. Mako Mining's return on equity of 34.25% beat DRDGOLD's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Mako Mining	25.11%	34.25%	22.57%
DRDGOLD	N/A	N/A	N/A

DRDGOLD has higher revenue and earnings than Mako Mining.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Mako Mining	$148.47M	6.22	$33.74M	$0.41	25.71
DRDGOLD	$676.84M	3.91	$123.57M	N/A	N/A

Summary

Mako Mining beats DRDGOLD on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Mako Mining News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MAKO and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

MAKO vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Mako Mining	Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$923.30M	$4.11B	$5.13B	$12.85B
Dividend Yield	N/A	5.19%	4.69%	11.08%
P/E Ratio	25.71	25.69	26.64	24.24
Price / Sales	6.22	8,008.20	4,767.73	99.81
Price / Cash	N/A	29.94	27.30	53.99
Price / Book	4.86	10.57	8.96	6.20
Net Income	$33.74M	$122.32M	$154.93M	$348.59M
7 Day Performance	4.15%	3.27%	2.58%	0.08%
1 Month Performance	47.62%	12.55%	10.17%	3.88%
1 Year Performance	N/A	57.65%	45.55%	16.98%

Mako Mining Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
MAKO Mako Mining	3.0453 of 5 stars	$10.54 +0.4%	N/A	N/A	$923.30M	$148.47M	25.71	N/A	News Coverage
FSM Fortuna Mining	4.1177 of 5 stars	$11.93 +0.3%	$14.00 +17.4%	+59.9%	$3.53B	$947.06M	10.11	4,294	Analyst Revision Gap Up
SA Seabridge Gold	1.4858 of 5 stars	$31.65 -4.9%	$40.00 +26.4%	+81.0%	$3.41B	N/A	N/A	40	News Coverage Analyst Upgrade Gap Up
AAUC Allied Gold	2.8543 of 5 stars	$23.55 +2.7%	N/A	+74.5%	$3.28B	$1.33B	N/A	2,095	Analyst Upgrade Gap Up
PPTA Perpetua Resources	2.8476 of 5 stars	$25.68 +2.5%	$35.90 +39.8%	+45.0%	$3.21B	N/A	N/A	30	News Coverage Earnings Report Analyst Forecast Analyst Revision Gap Up

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:MAKO) was last updated on 8/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Mako Mining (MAKO) Competitors

MAKO vs. FSM, SA, AAUC, PPTA, and DRD

How does Mako Mining compare to Fortuna Mining?

Summary

How does Mako Mining compare to Seabridge Gold?

Summary

How does Mako Mining compare to Allied Gold?

Summary

How does Mako Mining compare to Perpetua Resources?

Summary

How does Mako Mining compare to DRDGOLD?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MAKO vs. The Competition

Mako Mining Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Mako Mining (MAKO) Competitors

MAKO vs. FSM, SA, AAUC, PPTA, and DRD

How does Mako Mining compare to Fortuna Mining?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of FSM or MAKO?

Do analysts prefer FSM or MAKO?

Is FSM or MAKO more profitable?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, FSM or MAKO?

Does the media refer more to FSM or MAKO?

Summary

How does Mako Mining compare to Seabridge Gold?

Do analysts prefer SA or MAKO?

Is SA or MAKO more profitable?

Does the media refer more to SA or MAKO?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, SA or MAKO?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of SA or MAKO?

Summary

How does Mako Mining compare to Allied Gold?

Do analysts rate AAUC or MAKO?

Is AAUC or MAKO more profitable?

Does the media prefer AAUC or MAKO?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, AAUC or MAKO?

Summary

How does Mako Mining compare to Perpetua Resources?

Does the media favor MAKO or PPTA?

Is MAKO or PPTA more profitable?

Do analysts rate MAKO or PPTA?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of MAKO or PPTA?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, MAKO or PPTA?

Summary

How does Mako Mining compare to DRDGOLD?

Do analysts rate MAKO or DRD?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in MAKO or DRD?

Does the media prefer MAKO or DRD?

Is MAKO or DRD more profitable?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, MAKO or DRD?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MAKO vs. The Competition

Mako Mining Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools