Go Pro

Mako Mining (MAKO) Competitors

Mako Mining logo
$10.08 +0.26 (+2.65%)
Closing price 09/11/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$10.07 -0.01 (-0.05%)
As of 09/11/2026 07:30 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

MAKO vs. SA, AAUC, PPTA, DRD, and HYMC

Should you buy Mako Mining stock or one of its competitors? Mako Mining's main competitors and comparable companies include Seabridge Gold (SA), Allied Gold (AAUC), Perpetua Resources (PPTA), DRDGOLD (DRD), and Hycroft Mining (HYMC). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "gold" industry.

How does Mako Mining compare to Seabridge Gold?

Mako Mining (NASDAQ:MAKO) and Seabridge Gold (NYSE:SA) are both materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation and institutional ownership.

Seabridge Gold has a consensus target price of $40.00, indicating a potential upside of 28.76%. Given Seabridge Gold's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Seabridge Gold is more favorable than Mako Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Mako Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Seabridge Gold
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, Mako Mining had 3 more articles in the media than Seabridge Gold. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Mako Mining and 1 mentions for Seabridge Gold. Seabridge Gold's average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat Mako Mining's score of 1.20 indicating that Seabridge Gold is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Mako Mining
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Seabridge Gold
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

34.9% of Seabridge Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.1% of Mako Mining shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 12.8% of Seabridge Gold shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Mako Mining has a net margin of 25.11% compared to Seabridge Gold's net margin of 0.00%. Mako Mining's return on equity of 34.25% beat Seabridge Gold's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mako Mining25.11% 34.25% 22.57%
Seabridge Gold N/A -6.38%-4.06%

Mako Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Seabridge Gold. Seabridge Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mako Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mako Mining$148.47M5.95$33.74M$0.4124.59
Seabridge GoldN/AN/A-$38.06M-$0.48N/A

Summary

Mako Mining beats Seabridge Gold on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mako Mining compare to Allied Gold?

Mako Mining (NASDAQ:MAKO) and Allied Gold (NYSE:AAUC) are both materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and risk.

Mako Mining has a net margin of 25.11% compared to Allied Gold's net margin of -4.19%. Allied Gold's return on equity of 41.36% beat Mako Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mako Mining25.11% 34.25% 22.57%
Allied Gold -4.19%41.36%10.00%

Mako Mining has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Allied Gold. Allied Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mako Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mako Mining$148.47M5.95$33.74M$0.4124.59
Allied Gold$1.33B2.39-$51.85M-$0.54N/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Mako Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Allied Gold
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

In the previous week, Mako Mining had 1 more articles in the media than Allied Gold. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Mako Mining and 3 mentions for Allied Gold. Allied Gold's average media sentiment score of 1.46 beat Mako Mining's score of 1.20 indicating that Allied Gold is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Mako Mining
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Allied Gold
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Mako Mining beats Allied Gold on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mako Mining compare to Perpetua Resources?

Perpetua Resources (NASDAQ:PPTA) and Mako Mining (NASDAQ:MAKO) are both materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

Perpetua Resources currently has a consensus target price of $35.90, indicating a potential upside of 51.93%. Given Perpetua Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Perpetua Resources is more favorable than Mako Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Perpetua Resources
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57
Mako Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Mako Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Perpetua Resources. Perpetua Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mako Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Perpetua ResourcesN/AN/A-$100.39M-$2.02N/A
Mako Mining$148.47M5.95$33.74M$0.4124.59

In the previous week, Perpetua Resources had 3 more articles in the media than Mako Mining. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Perpetua Resources and 4 mentions for Mako Mining. Perpetua Resources' average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat Mako Mining's score of 1.20 indicating that Perpetua Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Perpetua Resources
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Mako Mining
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

70.1% of Perpetua Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Perpetua Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.1% of Mako Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Mako Mining has a net margin of 25.11% compared to Perpetua Resources' net margin of 0.00%. Mako Mining's return on equity of 34.25% beat Perpetua Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Perpetua ResourcesN/A -31.73% -30.46%
Mako Mining 25.11%34.25%22.57%

Summary

Mako Mining beats Perpetua Resources on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mako Mining compare to DRDGOLD?

DRDGOLD (NYSE:DRD) and Mako Mining (NASDAQ:MAKO) are both materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends and profitability.

DRDGOLD has higher revenue and earnings than Mako Mining.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
DRDGOLD$676.84M3.42$251.93MN/AN/A
Mako Mining$148.47M5.95$33.74M$0.4124.59

Mako Mining has a net margin of 25.11% compared to DRDGOLD's net margin of 0.00%. Mako Mining's return on equity of 34.25% beat DRDGOLD's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
DRDGOLDN/A N/A N/A
Mako Mining 25.11%34.25%22.57%

DRDGOLD currently has a consensus target price of $35.00, indicating a potential upside of 30.69%. Given DRDGOLD's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe DRDGOLD is more favorable than Mako Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
DRDGOLD
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Mako Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

14.7% of DRDGOLD shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of DRDGOLD shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 15.1% of Mako Mining shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Mako Mining had 4 more articles in the media than DRDGOLD. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Mako Mining and 0 mentions for DRDGOLD. DRDGOLD's average media sentiment score of 1.50 beat Mako Mining's score of 1.20 indicating that DRDGOLD is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
DRDGOLD Positive
Mako Mining Positive

Summary

Mako Mining beats DRDGOLD on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mako Mining compare to Hycroft Mining?

Hycroft Mining (NASDAQ:HYMC) and Mako Mining (NASDAQ:MAKO) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and dividends.

Hycroft Mining currently has a consensus price target of $25.00, indicating a potential upside of 18.04%. Given Hycroft Mining's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Hycroft Mining is more favorable than Mako Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hycroft Mining
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Mako Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

7.4% of Hycroft Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Hycroft Mining shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.1% of Mako Mining shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Mako Mining had 1 more articles in the media than Hycroft Mining. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Mako Mining and 3 mentions for Hycroft Mining. Mako Mining's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Hycroft Mining's score of 0.99 indicating that Mako Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Hycroft Mining
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Mako Mining
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Mako Mining has a net margin of 25.11% compared to Hycroft Mining's net margin of 0.00%. Mako Mining's return on equity of 34.25% beat Hycroft Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hycroft MiningN/A -46.86% -32.63%
Mako Mining 25.11%34.25%22.57%

Mako Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Hycroft Mining. Hycroft Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mako Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hycroft MiningN/AN/A-$40.66M-$0.99N/A
Mako Mining$148.47M5.95$33.74M$0.4124.59

Summary

Mako Mining beats Hycroft Mining on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Mako Mining News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MAKO and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MAKO and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MAKO vs. The Competition

MetricMako MiningMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$860.29M$3.93B$4.92B$12.72B
Dividend YieldN/A5.17%4.68%11.15%
P/E Ratio24.5926.2526.1925.29
Price / Sales5.958,047.474,792.6498.94
Price / CashN/A29.5126.9251.44
Price / BookN/A12.3310.246.20
Net Income$33.74M$127.55M$158.16M$358.50M
7 Day Performance-0.98%-1.43%-1.45%-2.35%
1 Month Performance0.90%9.72%7.08%-2.77%
1 Year PerformanceN/A47.16%37.22%7.63%

Mako Mining Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MAKO
Mako Mining
2.3639 of 5 stars
$10.08
+2.6%
N/AN/A$860.29M$148.47M24.59N/A
SA
Seabridge Gold
2.9963 of 5 stars
$31.93
-2.0%
$40.00
+25.3%
+66.7%$3.44BN/AN/A40
AAUC
Allied Gold
2.544 of 5 stars
$23.79
-1.1%
N/A+47.0%$3.32B$1.49BN/A2,095
PPTA
Perpetua Resources
3.213 of 5 stars
$25.17
+0.5%
$35.90
+42.7%
+37.3%$3.15BN/AN/A30
DRD
DRDGOLD
4.3485 of 5 stars
$28.73
-3.0%
$35.00
+21.8%
+17.2%$2.49B$676.84MN/A3,410

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:MAKO) was last updated on 9/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners