McEwen (MUX) Competitors

Agnico Eagle Mines presently has a consensus target price of $236.08, indicating a potential upside of 56.01%. McEwen has a consensus target price of $29.83, indicating a potential upside of 63.95%. Given McEwen's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe McEwen is more favorable than Agnico Eagle Mines.

Agnico Eagle Mines has a net margin of 39.46% compared to McEwen's net margin of 31.40%. Agnico Eagle Mines' return on equity of 21.09% beat McEwen's return on equity.

68.3% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.0% of McEwen shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.8% of McEwen shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Agnico Eagle Mines had 5 more articles in the media than McEwen. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Agnico Eagle Mines and 7 mentions for McEwen. McEwen's average media sentiment score of 0.20 beat Agnico Eagle Mines' score of 0.15 indicating that McEwen is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Agnico Eagle Mines has a beta of 0.56, suggesting that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, McEwen has a beta of 1.18, suggesting that its share price is 18% more volatile than the broader market.

Agnico Eagle Mines has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. Agnico Eagle Mines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McEwen, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

McEwen has a net margin of 31.40% compared to First Majestic Silver's net margin of 19.51%. McEwen's return on equity of 13.65% beat First Majestic Silver's return on equity.

First Majestic Silver presently has a consensus target price of $25.25, suggesting a potential upside of 48.12%. McEwen has a consensus target price of $29.83, suggesting a potential upside of 63.95%. Given McEwen's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe McEwen is more favorable than First Majestic Silver.

In the previous week, First Majestic Silver and First Majestic Silver both had 7 articles in the media. First Majestic Silver's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat McEwen's score of 0.20 indicating that First Majestic Silver is being referred to more favorably in the media.

27.2% of First Majestic Silver shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.0% of McEwen shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of First Majestic Silver shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.8% of McEwen shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

First Majestic Silver has a beta of 0.86, meaning that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, McEwen has a beta of 1.18, meaning that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market.

First Majestic Silver has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. McEwen is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than First Majestic Silver, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, McEwen had 3 more articles in the media than Alamos Gold. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for McEwen and 4 mentions for Alamos Gold. Alamos Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat McEwen's score of 0.20 indicating that Alamos Gold is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

17.0% of McEwen shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.3% of Alamos Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 14.8% of McEwen shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Alamos Gold shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

McEwen currently has a consensus price target of $29.83, indicating a potential upside of 63.95%. Alamos Gold has a consensus price target of $53.00, indicating a potential upside of 75.58%. Given Alamos Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Alamos Gold is more favorable than McEwen.

Alamos Gold has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. Alamos Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McEwen, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

McEwen has a beta of 1.18, meaning that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alamos Gold has a beta of 0.49, meaning that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market.

Alamos Gold has a net margin of 51.24% compared to McEwen's net margin of 31.40%. Alamos Gold's return on equity of 18.03% beat McEwen's return on equity.

In the previous week, McEwen had 1 more articles in the media than Fortuna Mining. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for McEwen and 6 mentions for Fortuna Mining. Fortuna Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.38 beat McEwen's score of 0.20 indicating that Fortuna Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

McEwen has a net margin of 31.40% compared to Fortuna Mining's net margin of 31.07%. Fortuna Mining's return on equity of 16.26% beat McEwen's return on equity.

Fortuna Mining currently has a consensus target price of $11.00, indicating a potential upside of 30.72%. McEwen has a consensus target price of $29.83, indicating a potential upside of 63.95%. Given McEwen's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe McEwen is more favorable than Fortuna Mining.

33.8% of Fortuna Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.0% of McEwen shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Fortuna Mining shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 14.8% of McEwen shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Fortuna Mining has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. Fortuna Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McEwen, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Fortuna Mining has a beta of 0.94, suggesting that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, McEwen has a beta of 1.18, suggesting that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market.