Which has preferable earnings and valuation, MUX or RGLD?

Royal Gold has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. McEwen is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Royal Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio McEwen $197.55M 5.39 $34.43M $1.18 15.12 Royal Gold $1.03B 16.87 $467.27M $8.39 24.41

Is MUX or RGLD more profitable?

Royal Gold has a net margin of 48.59% compared to McEwen's net margin of 31.40%. McEwen's return on equity of 13.65% beat Royal Gold's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets McEwen 31.40% 13.65% 9.05% Royal Gold 48.59% 12.63% 9.99%

Does the media favor MUX or RGLD?

In the previous week, Royal Gold had 1 more articles in the media than McEwen. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Royal Gold and 7 mentions for McEwen. Royal Gold's average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat McEwen's score of 0.33 indicating that Royal Gold is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment McEwen 1 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Royal Gold 5 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, AEM or MUX?

Agnico Eagle Mines has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. Agnico Eagle Mines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McEwen, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Agnico Eagle Mines $11.91B 6.71 $4.46B $10.64 15.00 McEwen $197.55M 5.39 $34.43M $1.18 15.12

Is AEM or MUX more profitable?

Agnico Eagle Mines has a net margin of 39.46% compared to McEwen's net margin of 31.40%. Agnico Eagle Mines' return on equity of 21.09% beat McEwen's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Agnico Eagle Mines 39.46% 21.09% 15.27% McEwen 31.40% 13.65% 9.05%

Does the media prefer AEM or MUX?

In the previous week, Agnico Eagle Mines had 13 more articles in the media than McEwen. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Agnico Eagle Mines and 7 mentions for McEwen. Agnico Eagle Mines' average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat McEwen's score of 0.33 indicating that Agnico Eagle Mines is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Agnico Eagle Mines 17 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive McEwen 1 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has better valuation & earnings, AG or MUX?

First Majestic Silver has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. McEwen is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than First Majestic Silver, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio First Majestic Silver $1.50B 5.43 $164.92M $0.60 27.52 McEwen $197.55M 5.39 $34.43M $1.18 15.12

Does the media favor AG or MUX?

In the previous week, McEwen had 4 more articles in the media than First Majestic Silver. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for McEwen and 3 mentions for First Majestic Silver. First Majestic Silver's average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat McEwen's score of 0.33 indicating that First Majestic Silver is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment First Majestic Silver 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive McEwen 1 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has better earnings & valuation, AGI or MUX?

Alamos Gold has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. Alamos Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McEwen, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Alamos Gold $2.07B 7.09 $885.80M $2.51 13.93 McEwen $197.55M 5.39 $34.43M $1.18 15.12

Is AGI or MUX more profitable?

Alamos Gold has a net margin of 51.24% compared to McEwen's net margin of 31.40%. Alamos Gold's return on equity of 18.03% beat McEwen's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Alamos Gold 51.24% 18.03% 12.42% McEwen 31.40% 13.65% 9.05%

Does the media prefer AGI or MUX?

In the previous week, McEwen had 6 more articles in the media than Alamos Gold. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for McEwen and 1 mentions for Alamos Gold. Alamos Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat McEwen's score of 0.33 indicating that Alamos Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Alamos Gold 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive McEwen 1 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has better valuation & earnings, MUX or FSM?

Fortuna Mining has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. Fortuna Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McEwen, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio McEwen $197.55M 5.39 $34.43M $1.18 15.12 Fortuna Mining $1.09B 2.38 $287.47M $1.06 8.11

Is MUX or FSM more profitable?

McEwen has a net margin of 31.40% compared to Fortuna Mining's net margin of 31.07%. Fortuna Mining's return on equity of 16.26% beat McEwen's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets McEwen 31.40% 13.65% 9.05% Fortuna Mining 31.07% 16.26% 11.95%

Does the media favor MUX or FSM?

In the previous week, McEwen had 6 more articles in the media than Fortuna Mining. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for McEwen and 1 mentions for Fortuna Mining. McEwen's average media sentiment score of 0.33 beat Fortuna Mining's score of 0.00 indicating that McEwen is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment McEwen 1 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Fortuna Mining 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

McEwen (MUX) Competitors

$17.84 -0.55 (-3.00%)

Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$17.79 -0.05 (-0.26%)

As of 07:43 PM Eastern

Compare

MUX vs. RGLD, AEM, AG, AGI, and FSM

Should you buy McEwen stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares McEwen with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with McEwen include Royal Gold (RGLD), Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM), First Majestic Silver (AG), Alamos Gold (AGI), and Fortuna Mining (FSM). These companies are all part of the "basic materials" sector.

How does McEwen compare to Royal Gold?

McEwen (NYSE:MUX) and Royal Gold (NASDAQ:RGLD) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

In the previous week, Royal Gold had 1 more articles in the media than McEwen. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Royal Gold and 7 mentions for McEwen. Royal Gold's average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat McEwen's score of 0.33 indicating that Royal Gold is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
McEwen	1 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Royal Gold	5 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

McEwen presently has a consensus target price of $29.83, suggesting a potential upside of 67.25%. Royal Gold has a consensus target price of $273.64, suggesting a potential upside of 33.62%. Given McEwen's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe McEwen is more favorable than Royal Gold.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
McEwen	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Royal Gold	2 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Royal Gold has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. McEwen is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Royal Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
McEwen	$197.55M	5.39	$34.43M	$1.18	15.12
Royal Gold	$1.03B	16.87	$467.27M	$8.39	24.41

17.0% of McEwen shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.7% of Royal Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.8% of McEwen shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Royal Gold shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Royal Gold has a net margin of 48.59% compared to McEwen's net margin of 31.40%. McEwen's return on equity of 13.65% beat Royal Gold's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
McEwen	31.40%	13.65%	9.05%
Royal Gold	48.59%	12.63%	9.99%

McEwen has a beta of 1.18, indicating that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Royal Gold has a beta of 0.42, indicating that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Royal Gold beats McEwen on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does McEwen compare to Agnico Eagle Mines?

Agnico Eagle Mines (NYSE:AEM) and McEwen (NYSE:MUX) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, risk, media sentiment, dividends and earnings.

Agnico Eagle Mines has a net margin of 39.46% compared to McEwen's net margin of 31.40%. Agnico Eagle Mines' return on equity of 21.09% beat McEwen's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Agnico Eagle Mines	39.46%	21.09%	15.27%
McEwen	31.40%	13.65%	9.05%

68.3% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.0% of McEwen shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.8% of McEwen shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Agnico Eagle Mines has a beta of 0.56, meaning that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, McEwen has a beta of 1.18, meaning that its share price is 18% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Agnico Eagle Mines had 13 more articles in the media than McEwen. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Agnico Eagle Mines and 7 mentions for McEwen. Agnico Eagle Mines' average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat McEwen's score of 0.33 indicating that Agnico Eagle Mines is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Agnico Eagle Mines	17 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
McEwen	1 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Agnico Eagle Mines presently has a consensus target price of $236.08, indicating a potential upside of 47.88%. McEwen has a consensus target price of $29.83, indicating a potential upside of 67.25%. Given McEwen's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe McEwen is more favorable than Agnico Eagle Mines.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Agnico Eagle Mines	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.76
McEwen	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

Agnico Eagle Mines has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. Agnico Eagle Mines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McEwen, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Agnico Eagle Mines	$11.91B	6.71	$4.46B	$10.64	15.00
McEwen	$197.55M	5.39	$34.43M	$1.18	15.12

Summary

Agnico Eagle Mines beats McEwen on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does McEwen compare to First Majestic Silver?

First Majestic Silver (NYSE:AG) and McEwen (NYSE:MUX) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings and media sentiment.

First Majestic Silver presently has a consensus price target of $25.25, suggesting a potential upside of 52.95%. McEwen has a consensus price target of $29.83, suggesting a potential upside of 67.25%. Given McEwen's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe McEwen is more favorable than First Majestic Silver.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
First Majestic Silver	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
McEwen	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

27.2% of First Majestic Silver shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.0% of McEwen shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of First Majestic Silver shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 14.8% of McEwen shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

McEwen has a net margin of 31.40% compared to First Majestic Silver's net margin of 19.51%. McEwen's return on equity of 13.65% beat First Majestic Silver's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
First Majestic Silver	19.51%	11.19%	7.77%
McEwen	31.40%	13.65%	9.05%

First Majestic Silver has a beta of 0.86, meaning that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, McEwen has a beta of 1.18, meaning that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market.

First Majestic Silver has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. McEwen is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than First Majestic Silver, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
First Majestic Silver	$1.50B	5.43	$164.92M	$0.60	27.52
McEwen	$197.55M	5.39	$34.43M	$1.18	15.12

In the previous week, McEwen had 4 more articles in the media than First Majestic Silver. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for McEwen and 3 mentions for First Majestic Silver. First Majestic Silver's average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat McEwen's score of 0.33 indicating that First Majestic Silver is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
First Majestic Silver	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
McEwen	1 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

First Majestic Silver and McEwen tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does McEwen compare to Alamos Gold?

Alamos Gold (NYSE:AGI) and McEwen (NYSE:MUX) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, McEwen had 6 more articles in the media than Alamos Gold. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for McEwen and 1 mentions for Alamos Gold. Alamos Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat McEwen's score of 0.33 indicating that Alamos Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Alamos Gold	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
McEwen	1 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

64.3% of Alamos Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.0% of McEwen shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Alamos Gold shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.8% of McEwen shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Alamos Gold has a beta of 0.49, indicating that its share price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, McEwen has a beta of 1.18, indicating that its share price is 18% more volatile than the broader market.

Alamos Gold has a net margin of 51.24% compared to McEwen's net margin of 31.40%. Alamos Gold's return on equity of 18.03% beat McEwen's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Alamos Gold	51.24%	18.03%	12.42%
McEwen	31.40%	13.65%	9.05%

Alamos Gold currently has a consensus target price of $50.67, indicating a potential upside of 44.90%. McEwen has a consensus target price of $29.83, indicating a potential upside of 67.25%. Given McEwen's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe McEwen is more favorable than Alamos Gold.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Alamos Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
McEwen	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

Alamos Gold has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. Alamos Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McEwen, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Alamos Gold	$2.07B	7.09	$885.80M	$2.51	13.93
McEwen	$197.55M	5.39	$34.43M	$1.18	15.12

Summary

Alamos Gold beats McEwen on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does McEwen compare to Fortuna Mining?

McEwen (NYSE:MUX) and Fortuna Mining (NYSE:FSM) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

McEwen has a beta of 1.18, suggesting that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fortuna Mining has a beta of 0.94, suggesting that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, McEwen had 6 more articles in the media than Fortuna Mining. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for McEwen and 1 mentions for Fortuna Mining. McEwen's average media sentiment score of 0.33 beat Fortuna Mining's score of 0.00 indicating that McEwen is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
McEwen	1 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Fortuna Mining	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

17.0% of McEwen shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.8% of Fortuna Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 14.8% of McEwen shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Fortuna Mining shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

McEwen currently has a consensus price target of $29.83, suggesting a potential upside of 67.25%. Fortuna Mining has a consensus price target of $11.00, suggesting a potential upside of 27.98%. Given McEwen's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe McEwen is more favorable than Fortuna Mining.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
McEwen	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Fortuna Mining	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.60

Fortuna Mining has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. Fortuna Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McEwen, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
McEwen	$197.55M	5.39	$34.43M	$1.18	15.12
Fortuna Mining	$1.09B	2.38	$287.47M	$1.06	8.11

McEwen has a net margin of 31.40% compared to Fortuna Mining's net margin of 31.07%. Fortuna Mining's return on equity of 16.26% beat McEwen's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
McEwen	31.40%	13.65%	9.05%
Fortuna Mining	31.07%	16.26%	11.95%

Summary

McEwen beats Fortuna Mining on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get McEwen News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MUX and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

MUX vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	McEwen	MINING Industry	Materials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$1.07B	$9.46B	$4.65B	$23.08B
Dividend Yield	N/A	1.72%	4.99%	4.10%
P/E Ratio	15.12	14.57	21.87	30.59
Price / Sales	5.39	171.59	6,566.85	12.90
Price / Cash	15.81	35.79	24.18	18.46
Price / Book	1.78	4.03	8.83	4.65
Net Income	$34.43M	$319.20M	$156.92M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-20.03%	-15.27%	-6.06%	-0.71%
1 Month Performance	-26.28%	-15.65%	-6.21%	0.06%
1 Year Performance	87.08%	77.87%	54.88%	21.50%

McEwen Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
MUX McEwen	3.4454 of 5 stars	$17.84 -3.0%	$29.83 +67.2%	+96.6%	$1.07B	$197.55M	15.12	430
RGLD Royal Gold	4.7655 of 5 stars	$215.88 -3.8%	$273.64 +26.8%	+16.9%	$18.49B	$1.31B	26.01	30	Gap Down
AEM Agnico Eagle Mines	4.818 of 5 stars	$176.24 -3.8%	$236.08 +34.0%	+37.4%	$91.66B	$13.54B	16.67	18,216	Gap Down
AG First Majestic Silver	4.797 of 5 stars	$20.66 -2.0%	$25.25 +22.2%	+107.8%	$10.41B	$1.26B	35.11	5,100	Positive News
AGI Alamos Gold	4.8619 of 5 stars	$39.41 -3.4%	$50.67 +28.6%	+34.3%	$17.13B	$1.81B	15.88	3,234

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:MUX) was last updated on 6/9/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

McEwen (MUX) Competitors

MUX vs. RGLD, AEM, AG, AGI, and FSM

How does McEwen compare to Royal Gold?

Summary

How does McEwen compare to Agnico Eagle Mines?

Summary

How does McEwen compare to First Majestic Silver?

Summary

How does McEwen compare to Alamos Gold?

Summary

How does McEwen compare to Fortuna Mining?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MUX vs. The Competition

McEwen Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

McEwen (MUX) Competitors

MUX vs. RGLD, AEM, AG, AGI, and FSM

How does McEwen compare to Royal Gold?

Does the media favor MUX or RGLD?

Do analysts rate MUX or RGLD?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, MUX or RGLD?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of MUX or RGLD?

Is MUX or RGLD more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, MUX or RGLD?

Summary

How does McEwen compare to Agnico Eagle Mines?

Is AEM or MUX more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in AEM or MUX?

Which has more volatility and risk, AEM or MUX?

Does the media prefer AEM or MUX?

Do analysts rate AEM or MUX?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, AEM or MUX?

Summary

How does McEwen compare to First Majestic Silver?

Do analysts rate AG or MUX?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in AG or MUX?

Is AG or MUX more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, AG or MUX?

Which has better valuation & earnings, AG or MUX?

Does the media favor AG or MUX?

Summary

How does McEwen compare to Alamos Gold?

Does the media prefer AGI or MUX?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in AGI or MUX?

Which has more volatility & risk, AGI or MUX?

Is AGI or MUX more profitable?

Do analysts prefer AGI or MUX?

Which has better earnings & valuation, AGI or MUX?

Summary

How does McEwen compare to Fortuna Mining?

Which has more risk and volatility, MUX or FSM?

Does the media favor MUX or FSM?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in MUX or FSM?

Do analysts rate MUX or FSM?

Which has better valuation & earnings, MUX or FSM?

Is MUX or FSM more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MUX vs. The Competition

McEwen Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools