S&P 500   3,870.29
DOW   31,391.52
QQQ   318.40
pixel
pixel
S&P 500   3,870.29
DOW   31,391.52
QQQ   318.40
pixel
pixel
S&P 500   3,870.29
DOW   31,391.52
QQQ   318.40
pixel
pixel
S&P 500   3,870.29
DOW   31,391.52
QQQ   318.40
pixel
pixel
Log in
NYSE:MUX

McEwen Mining Competitors

$1.13
+0.06 (+5.61 %)
(As of 03/2/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$1.08
Now: $1.13
$1.15
50-Day Range
$0.91
MA: $1.11
$1.46
52-Week Range
$0.53
Now: $1.13
$1.60
Volume4.54 million shs
Average Volume9.75 million shs
Market Capitalization$484.88 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta0.97

Competitors

McEwen Mining (NYSE:MUX) Vs. EGO, OR, IAG, FSM, SA, and SAND

Should you be buying MUX stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "gold & silver ores" are considered alternatives and competitors to McEwen Mining, including Eldorado Gold (EGO), Osisko Gold Royalties (OR), IAMGOLD (IAG), Fortuna Silver Mines (FSM), Seabridge Gold (SA), and Sandstorm Gold (SAND).

McEwen Mining (NYSE:MUX) and Eldorado Gold (NYSE:EGO) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, dividends and institutional ownership.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for McEwen Mining and Eldorado Gold, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
McEwen Mining00303.00
Eldorado Gold23502.30

McEwen Mining currently has a consensus target price of $2.8333, suggesting a potential upside of 150.74%. Eldorado Gold has a consensus target price of $15.15, suggesting a potential upside of 38.23%. Given McEwen Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe McEwen Mining is more favorable than Eldorado Gold.

Volatility and Risk

McEwen Mining has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Eldorado Gold has a beta of 1.49, indicating that its stock price is 49% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares McEwen Mining and Eldorado Gold's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
McEwen Mining-140.63%-16.86%-12.95%
Eldorado Gold18.40%3.76%2.77%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares McEwen Mining and Eldorado Gold's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
McEwen Mining$117.02 million4.14$-59,750,000.00($0.17)-6.65
Eldorado Gold$617.80 million3.10$80.59 million$0.04274.00

Eldorado Gold has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen Mining. McEwen Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Eldorado Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

16.0% of McEwen Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.7% of Eldorado Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. 21.1% of McEwen Mining shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Eldorado Gold beats McEwen Mining on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Osisko Gold Royalties (NYSE:OR) and McEwen Mining (NYSE:MUX) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Osisko Gold Royalties and McEwen Mining, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Osisko Gold Royalties02702.78
McEwen Mining00303.00

Osisko Gold Royalties currently has a consensus price target of $20.7143, suggesting a potential upside of 95.05%. McEwen Mining has a consensus price target of $2.8333, suggesting a potential upside of 150.74%. Given McEwen Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe McEwen Mining is more favorable than Osisko Gold Royalties.

Volatility & Risk

Osisko Gold Royalties has a beta of 0.66, suggesting that its share price is 34% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, McEwen Mining has a beta of 0.97, suggesting that its share price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Osisko Gold Royalties and McEwen Mining's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Osisko Gold Royalties-72.90%2.66%2.00%
McEwen Mining-140.63%-16.86%-12.95%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Osisko Gold Royalties and McEwen Mining's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Osisko Gold Royalties$295.86 million6.00$-176,490,000.00$0.2150.57
McEwen Mining$117.02 million4.14$-59,750,000.00($0.17)-6.65

McEwen Mining has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Osisko Gold Royalties. McEwen Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Osisko Gold Royalties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

51.4% of Osisko Gold Royalties shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.0% of McEwen Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 21.1% of McEwen Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Osisko Gold Royalties beats McEwen Mining on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

IAMGOLD (NYSE:IAG) and McEwen Mining (NYSE:MUX) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations for IAMGOLD and McEwen Mining, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
IAMGOLD15602.42
McEwen Mining00303.00

IAMGOLD currently has a consensus price target of $12.7650, suggesting a potential upside of 324.09%. McEwen Mining has a consensus price target of $2.8333, suggesting a potential upside of 150.74%. Given IAMGOLD's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe IAMGOLD is more favorable than McEwen Mining.

Volatility & Risk

IAMGOLD has a beta of 0.81, suggesting that its share price is 19% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, McEwen Mining has a beta of 0.97, suggesting that its share price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares IAMGOLD and McEwen Mining's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
IAMGOLD-31.53%2.79%1.70%
McEwen Mining-140.63%-16.86%-12.95%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares IAMGOLD and McEwen Mining's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
IAMGOLD$1.07 billion1.34$-412,600,000.00($0.04)-75.25
McEwen Mining$117.02 million4.14$-59,750,000.00($0.17)-6.65

McEwen Mining has lower revenue, but higher earnings than IAMGOLD. IAMGOLD is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McEwen Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

51.4% of IAMGOLD shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.0% of McEwen Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 21.1% of McEwen Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

IAMGOLD beats McEwen Mining on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Fortuna Silver Mines (NYSE:FSM) and McEwen Mining (NYSE:MUX) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Fortuna Silver Mines and McEwen Mining, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Fortuna Silver Mines05302.38
McEwen Mining00303.00

Fortuna Silver Mines currently has a consensus price target of $9.0925, suggesting a potential upside of 22.87%. McEwen Mining has a consensus price target of $2.8333, suggesting a potential upside of 150.74%. Given McEwen Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe McEwen Mining is more favorable than Fortuna Silver Mines.

Volatility & Risk

Fortuna Silver Mines has a beta of 1.12, suggesting that its share price is 12% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, McEwen Mining has a beta of 0.97, suggesting that its share price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Fortuna Silver Mines and McEwen Mining's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Fortuna Silver Mines8.97%2.96%2.05%
McEwen Mining-140.63%-16.86%-12.95%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Fortuna Silver Mines and McEwen Mining's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fortuna Silver Mines$257.19 million5.30$23.80 million$0.1743.53
McEwen Mining$117.02 million4.14$-59,750,000.00($0.17)-6.65

Fortuna Silver Mines has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen Mining. McEwen Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fortuna Silver Mines, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

34.5% of Fortuna Silver Mines shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.0% of McEwen Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 21.1% of McEwen Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Fortuna Silver Mines beats McEwen Mining on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Seabridge Gold (NYSE:SA) and McEwen Mining (NYSE:MUX) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Seabridge Gold and McEwen Mining's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Seabridge GoldN/AN/A$-8,750,000.00($0.14)-124.57
McEwen Mining$117.02 million4.14$-59,750,000.00($0.17)-6.65

Seabridge Gold has higher earnings, but lower revenue than McEwen Mining. Seabridge Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McEwen Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

22.7% of Seabridge Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.0% of McEwen Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.8% of Seabridge Gold shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 21.1% of McEwen Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Seabridge Gold and McEwen Mining, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Seabridge Gold01102.50
McEwen Mining00303.00

Seabridge Gold currently has a consensus price target of $65.00, suggesting a potential upside of 272.71%. McEwen Mining has a consensus price target of $2.8333, suggesting a potential upside of 150.74%. Given Seabridge Gold's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Seabridge Gold is more favorable than McEwen Mining.

Volatility & Risk

Seabridge Gold has a beta of 0.95, suggesting that its share price is 5% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, McEwen Mining has a beta of 0.97, suggesting that its share price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Seabridge Gold and McEwen Mining's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Seabridge GoldN/A-1.16%-1.08%
McEwen Mining-140.63%-16.86%-12.95%

Summary

Seabridge Gold beats McEwen Mining on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sandstorm Gold (NYSE:SAND) and McEwen Mining (NYSE:MUX) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, dividends and institutional ownership.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Sandstorm Gold and McEwen Mining's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sandstorm Gold$89.43 million13.98$16.40 million$0.0971.33
McEwen Mining$117.02 million4.14$-59,750,000.00($0.17)-6.65

Sandstorm Gold has higher earnings, but lower revenue than McEwen Mining. McEwen Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sandstorm Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

39.0% of Sandstorm Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.0% of McEwen Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 21.1% of McEwen Mining shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Sandstorm Gold and McEwen Mining, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Sandstorm Gold03602.67
McEwen Mining00303.00

Sandstorm Gold currently has a consensus price target of $13.3167, suggesting a potential upside of 107.42%. McEwen Mining has a consensus price target of $2.8333, suggesting a potential upside of 150.74%. Given McEwen Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe McEwen Mining is more favorable than Sandstorm Gold.

Risk and Volatility

Sandstorm Gold has a beta of 1.05, suggesting that its share price is 5% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, McEwen Mining has a beta of 0.97, suggesting that its share price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Sandstorm Gold and McEwen Mining's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Sandstorm Gold11.03%3.06%2.90%
McEwen Mining-140.63%-16.86%-12.95%

Summary

Sandstorm Gold beats McEwen Mining on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.


McEwen Mining Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Eldorado Gold logo
EGO
Eldorado Gold
2.0$10.96+4.6%$1.92 billion$617.80 million10.64Earnings Announcement
Analyst Upgrade
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Osisko Gold Royalties logo
OR
Osisko Gold Royalties
2.4$10.62+7.1%$1.78 billion$295.86 million-14.35Dividend Increase
Analyst Revision
IAMGOLD logo
IAG
IAMGOLD
1.9$3.01+4.0%$1.43 billion$1.07 billion-3.76
Fortuna Silver Mines logo
FSM
Fortuna Silver Mines
1.2$7.40+3.0%$1.36 billion$257.19 million56.93Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Upgrade
Seabridge Gold logo
SA
Seabridge Gold
1.2$17.44+3.5%$1.29 billionN/A-249.14
Sandstorm Gold logo
SAND
Sandstorm Gold
2.1$6.42+5.9%$1.25 billion$89.43 million160.54News Coverage
Endeavour Silver logo
EXK
Endeavour Silver
1.3$6.28+7.2%$996.17 million$121.72 million-24.15Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
News Coverage
Maverix Metals logo
MMX
Maverix Metals
1.7$5.12+4.7%$719.15 million$33.24 million102.40Upcoming Earnings
DRDGOLD logo
DRD
DRDGOLD
1.7$9.42+2.1%$647.06 million$269.51 million18.12
HYMC
Hycroft Mining
1.8$7.12+2.2%$425.37 millionN/A0.00
KOR
Corvus Gold
0.1$2.03+10.3%$257.09 millionN/A-15.62
Fury Gold Mines logo
FURY
Fury Gold Mines
1.4$1.41+3.5%$166.13 millionN/A-12.37
Fury Gold Mines logo
FURY
Fury Gold Mines
1.7$1.41+3.5%$166.13 millionN/A-12.37
CHNR
China Natural Resources
0.4$1.90+8.9%$47.33 million$1.86 million0.00Decrease in Short Interest
This page was last updated on 3/3/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.