Which has better valuation & earnings, MUX or RGLD?

Royal Gold has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. McEwen is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Royal Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio McEwen $197.55M 4.98 $34.43M $1.18 13.95 Royal Gold $1.03B 15.43 $467.27M $8.39 22.33

Is MUX or RGLD more profitable?

Royal Gold has a net margin of 48.59% compared to McEwen's net margin of 31.40%. McEwen's return on equity of 13.65% beat Royal Gold's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets McEwen 31.40% 13.65% 9.05% Royal Gold 48.59% 12.63% 9.99%

Does the media favor MUX or RGLD?

In the previous week, Royal Gold had 14 more articles in the media than McEwen. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Royal Gold and 1 mentions for McEwen. Royal Gold's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat McEwen's score of 0.00 indicating that Royal Gold is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment McEwen 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Royal Gold 10 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has better earnings & valuation, MUX or AEM?

Agnico Eagle Mines has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. Agnico Eagle Mines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McEwen, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio McEwen $197.55M 4.98 $34.43M $1.18 13.95 Agnico Eagle Mines $13.54B 5.11 $4.46B $10.64 12.81

Is MUX or AEM more profitable?

Agnico Eagle Mines has a net margin of 39.46% compared to McEwen's net margin of 31.40%. Agnico Eagle Mines' return on equity of 21.09% beat McEwen's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets McEwen 31.40% 13.65% 9.05% Agnico Eagle Mines 39.46% 21.09% 15.27%

Does the media favor MUX or AEM?

In the previous week, Agnico Eagle Mines had 33 more articles in the media than McEwen. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for Agnico Eagle Mines and 1 mentions for McEwen. Agnico Eagle Mines' average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat McEwen's score of 0.00 indicating that Agnico Eagle Mines is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment McEwen 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Agnico Eagle Mines 17 Very Positive mention(s) 4 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 5 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has better earnings & valuation, MUX or AG?

First Majestic Silver has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. McEwen is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than First Majestic Silver, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio McEwen $197.55M 4.98 $34.43M $1.18 13.95 First Majestic Silver $1.26B 6.23 $164.92M $0.60 26.46

Does the media prefer MUX or AG?

In the previous week, First Majestic Silver had 7 more articles in the media than McEwen. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for First Majestic Silver and 1 mentions for McEwen. First Majestic Silver's average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat McEwen's score of 0.00 indicating that First Majestic Silver is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment McEwen 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral First Majestic Silver 5 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, AGI or MUX?

Alamos Gold has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. Alamos Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McEwen, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Alamos Gold $1.81B 6.52 $885.80M $2.51 11.22 McEwen $197.55M 4.98 $34.43M $1.18 13.95

Is AGI or MUX more profitable?

Alamos Gold has a net margin of 51.24% compared to McEwen's net margin of 31.40%. Alamos Gold's return on equity of 18.03% beat McEwen's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Alamos Gold 51.24% 18.03% 12.42% McEwen 31.40% 13.65% 9.05%

Does the media refer more to AGI or MUX?

In the previous week, Alamos Gold had 11 more articles in the media than McEwen. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Alamos Gold and 1 mentions for McEwen. Alamos Gold's average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat McEwen's score of 0.00 indicating that Alamos Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Alamos Gold 7 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive McEwen 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has better earnings and valuation, MUX or FSM?

Fortuna Mining has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. Fortuna Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McEwen, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio McEwen $197.55M 4.98 $34.43M $1.18 13.95 Fortuna Mining $947.06M 2.54 $287.47M $1.06 7.58

Is MUX or FSM more profitable?

McEwen has a net margin of 31.40% compared to Fortuna Mining's net margin of 31.07%. Fortuna Mining's return on equity of 16.26% beat McEwen's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets McEwen 31.40% 13.65% 9.05% Fortuna Mining 31.07% 16.26% 11.95%

Does the media favor MUX or FSM?

In the previous week, Fortuna Mining had 4 more articles in the media than McEwen. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Fortuna Mining and 1 mentions for McEwen. Fortuna Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat McEwen's score of 0.00 indicating that Fortuna Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment McEwen 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Fortuna Mining 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

McEwen (MUX) Competitors

$16.46 +0.09 (+0.57%)

Closing price 07/20/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$16.90 +0.44 (+2.64%)

As of 08:31 AM Eastern

Compare

MUX vs. RGLD, AEM, AG, AGI, and FSM

Should you buy McEwen stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares McEwen with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with McEwen include Royal Gold (RGLD), Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM), First Majestic Silver (AG), Alamos Gold (AGI), and Fortuna Mining (FSM). These companies are all part of the "basic materials" sector.

How does McEwen compare to Royal Gold?

McEwen (NYSE:MUX) and Royal Gold (NASDAQ:RGLD) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment and earnings.

Royal Gold has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. McEwen is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Royal Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
McEwen	$197.55M	4.98	$34.43M	$1.18	13.95
Royal Gold	$1.03B	15.43	$467.27M	$8.39	22.33

Royal Gold has a net margin of 48.59% compared to McEwen's net margin of 31.40%. McEwen's return on equity of 13.65% beat Royal Gold's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
McEwen	31.40%	13.65%	9.05%
Royal Gold	48.59%	12.63%	9.99%

In the previous week, Royal Gold had 14 more articles in the media than McEwen. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Royal Gold and 1 mentions for McEwen. Royal Gold's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat McEwen's score of 0.00 indicating that Royal Gold is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
McEwen	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Royal Gold	10 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

McEwen currently has a consensus price target of $29.83, indicating a potential upside of 81.20%. Royal Gold has a consensus price target of $280.27, indicating a potential upside of 49.59%. Given McEwen's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe McEwen is more favorable than Royal Gold.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
McEwen	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.60
Royal Gold	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.62

McEwen has a beta of 1.21, indicating that its share price is 21% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Royal Gold has a beta of 0.44, indicating that its share price is 56% less volatile than the broader market.

17.0% of McEwen shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.7% of Royal Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.8% of McEwen shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Royal Gold shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Royal Gold beats McEwen on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does McEwen compare to Agnico Eagle Mines?

McEwen (NYSE:MUX) and Agnico Eagle Mines (NYSE:AEM) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, profitability and risk.

Agnico Eagle Mines has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. Agnico Eagle Mines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McEwen, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
McEwen	$197.55M	4.98	$34.43M	$1.18	13.95
Agnico Eagle Mines	$13.54B	5.11	$4.46B	$10.64	12.81

McEwen currently has a consensus price target of $29.83, indicating a potential upside of 81.20%. Agnico Eagle Mines has a consensus price target of $233.62, indicating a potential upside of 71.46%. Given McEwen's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe McEwen is more favorable than Agnico Eagle Mines.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
McEwen	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.60
Agnico Eagle Mines	1 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.65

Agnico Eagle Mines has a net margin of 39.46% compared to McEwen's net margin of 31.40%. Agnico Eagle Mines' return on equity of 21.09% beat McEwen's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
McEwen	31.40%	13.65%	9.05%
Agnico Eagle Mines	39.46%	21.09%	15.27%

In the previous week, Agnico Eagle Mines had 33 more articles in the media than McEwen. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for Agnico Eagle Mines and 1 mentions for McEwen. Agnico Eagle Mines' average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat McEwen's score of 0.00 indicating that Agnico Eagle Mines is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
McEwen	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Agnico Eagle Mines	17 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	5 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

17.0% of McEwen shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.3% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are held by institutional investors. 14.8% of McEwen shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

McEwen has a beta of 1.21, suggesting that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Agnico Eagle Mines has a beta of 0.6, suggesting that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Agnico Eagle Mines beats McEwen on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does McEwen compare to First Majestic Silver?

McEwen (NYSE:MUX) and First Majestic Silver (NYSE:AG) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

McEwen has a beta of 1.21, meaning that its share price is 21% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, First Majestic Silver has a beta of 0.91, meaning that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

McEwen has a net margin of 31.40% compared to First Majestic Silver's net margin of 19.51%. McEwen's return on equity of 13.65% beat First Majestic Silver's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
McEwen	31.40%	13.65%	9.05%
First Majestic Silver	19.51%	11.19%	7.77%

In the previous week, First Majestic Silver had 7 more articles in the media than McEwen. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for First Majestic Silver and 1 mentions for McEwen. First Majestic Silver's average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat McEwen's score of 0.00 indicating that First Majestic Silver is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
McEwen	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
First Majestic Silver	5 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

First Majestic Silver has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. McEwen is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than First Majestic Silver, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
McEwen	$197.55M	4.98	$34.43M	$1.18	13.95
First Majestic Silver	$1.26B	6.23	$164.92M	$0.60	26.46

17.0% of McEwen shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.2% of First Majestic Silver shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.8% of McEwen shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of First Majestic Silver shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

McEwen presently has a consensus price target of $29.83, suggesting a potential upside of 81.20%. First Majestic Silver has a consensus price target of $23.50, suggesting a potential upside of 48.03%. Given McEwen's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe McEwen is more favorable than First Majestic Silver.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
McEwen	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.60
First Majestic Silver	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.78

Summary

First Majestic Silver beats McEwen on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does McEwen compare to Alamos Gold?

Alamos Gold (NYSE:AGI) and McEwen (NYSE:MUX) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk and dividends.

Alamos Gold has a beta of 0.55, meaning that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, McEwen has a beta of 1.21, meaning that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the broader market.

Alamos Gold has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. Alamos Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McEwen, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Alamos Gold	$1.81B	6.52	$885.80M	$2.51	11.22
McEwen	$197.55M	4.98	$34.43M	$1.18	13.95

Alamos Gold currently has a consensus target price of $47.50, indicating a potential upside of 68.71%. McEwen has a consensus target price of $29.83, indicating a potential upside of 81.20%. Given McEwen's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe McEwen is more favorable than Alamos Gold.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Alamos Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.91
McEwen	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.60

64.3% of Alamos Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.0% of McEwen shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Alamos Gold shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 14.8% of McEwen shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Alamos Gold has a net margin of 51.24% compared to McEwen's net margin of 31.40%. Alamos Gold's return on equity of 18.03% beat McEwen's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Alamos Gold	51.24%	18.03%	12.42%
McEwen	31.40%	13.65%	9.05%

In the previous week, Alamos Gold had 11 more articles in the media than McEwen. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Alamos Gold and 1 mentions for McEwen. Alamos Gold's average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat McEwen's score of 0.00 indicating that Alamos Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Alamos Gold	7 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
McEwen	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Alamos Gold beats McEwen on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does McEwen compare to Fortuna Mining?

McEwen (NYSE:MUX) and Fortuna Mining (NYSE:FSM) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, earnings, dividends and profitability.

McEwen has a net margin of 31.40% compared to Fortuna Mining's net margin of 31.07%. Fortuna Mining's return on equity of 16.26% beat McEwen's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
McEwen	31.40%	13.65%	9.05%
Fortuna Mining	31.07%	16.26%	11.95%

17.0% of McEwen shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.8% of Fortuna Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 14.8% of McEwen shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Fortuna Mining shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Fortuna Mining had 4 more articles in the media than McEwen. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Fortuna Mining and 1 mentions for McEwen. Fortuna Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat McEwen's score of 0.00 indicating that Fortuna Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
McEwen	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Fortuna Mining	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

McEwen currently has a consensus price target of $29.83, indicating a potential upside of 81.20%. Fortuna Mining has a consensus price target of $14.00, indicating a potential upside of 74.24%. Given McEwen's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe McEwen is more favorable than Fortuna Mining.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
McEwen	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.60
Fortuna Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.60

Fortuna Mining has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. Fortuna Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McEwen, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
McEwen	$197.55M	4.98	$34.43M	$1.18	13.95
Fortuna Mining	$947.06M	2.54	$287.47M	$1.06	7.58

McEwen has a beta of 1.21, indicating that its share price is 21% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fortuna Mining has a beta of 0.99, indicating that its share price is 1% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

McEwen and Fortuna Mining tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get McEwen News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MUX and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

MUX vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	McEwen	MINING Industry	Materials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$977.95M	$8.47B	$4.47B	$23.42B
Dividend Yield	N/A	1.97%	5.04%	4.15%
P/E Ratio	13.95	13.11	20.44	30.65
Price / Sales	4.98	106.96	5,740.79	20.32
Price / Cash	14.16	34.66	24.07	18.81
Price / Book	1.64	3.45	8.48	4.74
Net Income	$34.43M	$312.64M	$157.08M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-7.78%	-6.67%	-1.96%	-0.46%
1 Month Performance	-15.12%	-17.51%	-5.87%	0.67%
1 Year Performance	45.76%	35.91%	34.78%	16.45%

McEwen Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
MUX McEwen	2.8625 of 5 stars	$16.46 +0.6%	$29.83 +81.2%	+50.5%	$977.95M	$197.55M	13.95	430
RGLD Royal Gold	4.9293 of 5 stars	$197.90 +2.3%	$282.55 +42.8%	+21.1%	$16.76B	$1.03B	23.53	30	News Coverage Positive News Analyst Revision
AEM Agnico Eagle Mines	4.5506 of 5 stars	$147.15 +2.5%	$238.31 +62.0%	+15.7%	$74.39B	$11.91B	13.77	18,216	Analyst Revision
AG First Majestic Silver	4.8315 of 5 stars	$17.05 +3.9%	$23.67 +38.8%	+92.0%	$8.38B	$1.26B	28.32	5,100	Positive News Analyst Revision
AGI Alamos Gold	4.9973 of 5 stars	$29.57 +2.5%	$47.50 +60.6%	+13.3%	$12.37B	$2.07B	11.75	3,234	News Coverage Positive News Analyst Revision

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:MUX) was last updated on 7/21/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

McEwen (MUX) Competitors

MUX vs. RGLD, AEM, AG, AGI, and FSM

How does McEwen compare to Royal Gold?

Summary

How does McEwen compare to Agnico Eagle Mines?

Summary

How does McEwen compare to First Majestic Silver?

Summary

How does McEwen compare to Alamos Gold?

Summary

How does McEwen compare to Fortuna Mining?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MUX vs. The Competition

McEwen Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

McEwen (MUX) Competitors

MUX vs. RGLD, AEM, AG, AGI, and FSM

How does McEwen compare to Royal Gold?

Which has better valuation & earnings, MUX or RGLD?

Is MUX or RGLD more profitable?

Does the media favor MUX or RGLD?

Do analysts recommend MUX or RGLD?

Which has more volatility & risk, MUX or RGLD?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in MUX or RGLD?

Summary

How does McEwen compare to Agnico Eagle Mines?

Which has better earnings & valuation, MUX or AEM?

Do analysts rate MUX or AEM?

Is MUX or AEM more profitable?

Does the media favor MUX or AEM?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in MUX or AEM?

Which has more volatility & risk, MUX or AEM?

Summary

How does McEwen compare to First Majestic Silver?

Which has more risk & volatility, MUX or AG?

Is MUX or AG more profitable?

Does the media prefer MUX or AG?

Which has better earnings & valuation, MUX or AG?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of MUX or AG?

Do analysts recommend MUX or AG?

Summary

How does McEwen compare to Alamos Gold?

Which has more volatility & risk, AGI or MUX?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, AGI or MUX?

Do analysts rate AGI or MUX?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in AGI or MUX?

Is AGI or MUX more profitable?

Does the media refer more to AGI or MUX?

Summary

How does McEwen compare to Fortuna Mining?

Is MUX or FSM more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in MUX or FSM?

Does the media favor MUX or FSM?

Do analysts prefer MUX or FSM?

Which has better earnings and valuation, MUX or FSM?

Which has more volatility & risk, MUX or FSM?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MUX vs. The Competition

McEwen Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools