Which has preferable valuation & earnings, MUX or AEM?

Agnico Eagle Mines has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. McEwen is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Agnico Eagle Mines, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio McEwen $197.55M 5.78 $34.43M $1.26 14.77 Agnico Eagle Mines $11.91B 8.40 $4.46B $11.69 16.88

Is MUX or AEM more profitable?

Agnico Eagle Mines has a net margin of 40.44% compared to McEwen's net margin of 32.46%. Agnico Eagle Mines' return on equity of 22.04% beat McEwen's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets McEwen 32.46% 13.48% 9.13% Agnico Eagle Mines 40.44% 22.04% 16.22%

Does the media prefer MUX or AEM?

In the previous week, Agnico Eagle Mines had 24 more articles in the media than McEwen. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for Agnico Eagle Mines and 3 mentions for McEwen. Agnico Eagle Mines' average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat McEwen's score of 0.44 indicating that Agnico Eagle Mines is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment McEwen 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Agnico Eagle Mines 16 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has higher valuation & earnings, MUX or AG?

First Majestic Silver has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. McEwen is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than First Majestic Silver, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio McEwen $197.55M 5.78 $34.43M $1.26 14.77 First Majestic Silver $1.26B 7.37 $164.92M $0.71 26.49

Does the media favor MUX or AG?

In the previous week, First Majestic Silver had 5 more articles in the media than McEwen. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for First Majestic Silver and 3 mentions for McEwen. First Majestic Silver's average media sentiment score of 1.21 beat McEwen's score of 0.44 indicating that First Majestic Silver is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment McEwen 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral First Majestic Silver 7 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, MUX or AGI?

Alamos Gold has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. Alamos Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McEwen, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio McEwen $197.55M 5.78 $34.43M $1.26 14.77 Alamos Gold $1.81B 8.24 $885.80M $2.77 12.86

Is MUX or AGI more profitable?

Alamos Gold has a net margin of 52.64% compared to McEwen's net margin of 32.46%. Alamos Gold's return on equity of 19.28% beat McEwen's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets McEwen 32.46% 13.48% 9.13% Alamos Gold 52.64% 19.28% 13.47%

Does the media refer more to MUX or AGI?

In the previous week, Alamos Gold had 2 more articles in the media than McEwen. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Alamos Gold and 3 mentions for McEwen. Alamos Gold's average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat McEwen's score of 0.44 indicating that Alamos Gold is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment McEwen 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Alamos Gold 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, MUX or FSM?

Fortuna Mining has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. Fortuna Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McEwen, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio McEwen $197.55M 5.78 $34.43M $1.26 14.77 Fortuna Mining $947.06M 3.63 $287.47M $1.18 9.85

Is MUX or FSM more profitable?

McEwen has a net margin of 32.46% compared to Fortuna Mining's net margin of 31.99%. Fortuna Mining's return on equity of 17.48% beat McEwen's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets McEwen 32.46% 13.48% 9.13% Fortuna Mining 31.99% 17.48% 12.88%

Does the media favor MUX or FSM?

In the previous week, McEwen had 1 more articles in the media than Fortuna Mining. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for McEwen and 2 mentions for Fortuna Mining. Fortuna Mining's average media sentiment score of 1.71 beat McEwen's score of 0.44 indicating that Fortuna Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment McEwen 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Fortuna Mining 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Which has better earnings and valuation, KGC or MUX?

Kinross Gold has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. Kinross Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McEwen, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Kinross Gold $7.05B 4.73 $2.39B $2.64 10.67 McEwen $197.55M 5.78 $34.43M $1.26 14.77

Is KGC or MUX more profitable?

Kinross Gold has a net margin of 37.52% compared to McEwen's net margin of 32.46%. Kinross Gold's return on equity of 34.00% beat McEwen's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Kinross Gold 37.52% 34.00% 23.84% McEwen 32.46% 13.48% 9.13%

Does the media prefer KGC or MUX?

In the previous week, Kinross Gold had 7 more articles in the media than McEwen. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Kinross Gold and 3 mentions for McEwen. Kinross Gold's average media sentiment score of 1.52 beat McEwen's score of 0.44 indicating that Kinross Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Kinross Gold 7 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive McEwen 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

McEwen (MUX) Competitors

$18.60 -0.93 (-4.74%)

Closing price 09/14/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$18.51 -0.10 (-0.53%)

As of 05:50 AM Eastern

Compare

MUX vs. AEM, AG, AGI, FSM, and KGC

Should you buy McEwen stock or one of its competitors? McEwen's main competitors and comparable companies include Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM), First Majestic Silver (AG), Alamos Gold (AGI), Fortuna Mining (FSM), and Kinross Gold (KGC). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "metals & mining" industry.

How does McEwen compare to Agnico Eagle Mines?

McEwen (NYSE:MUX) and Agnico Eagle Mines (NYSE:AEM) are both materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

17.0% of McEwen shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.3% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are held by institutional investors. 14.8% of McEwen shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

McEwen has a beta of 1.26, suggesting that its share price is 26% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Agnico Eagle Mines has a beta of 0.67, suggesting that its share price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

Agnico Eagle Mines has a net margin of 40.44% compared to McEwen's net margin of 32.46%. Agnico Eagle Mines' return on equity of 22.04% beat McEwen's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
McEwen	32.46%	13.48%	9.13%
Agnico Eagle Mines	40.44%	22.04%	16.22%

In the previous week, Agnico Eagle Mines had 24 more articles in the media than McEwen. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for Agnico Eagle Mines and 3 mentions for McEwen. Agnico Eagle Mines' average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat McEwen's score of 0.44 indicating that Agnico Eagle Mines is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
McEwen	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Agnico Eagle Mines	16 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Agnico Eagle Mines has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. McEwen is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Agnico Eagle Mines, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
McEwen	$197.55M	5.78	$34.43M	$1.26	14.77
Agnico Eagle Mines	$11.91B	8.40	$4.46B	$11.69	16.88

McEwen currently has a consensus price target of $28.00, suggesting a potential upside of 50.50%. Agnico Eagle Mines has a consensus price target of $226.00, suggesting a potential upside of 14.54%. Given McEwen's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe McEwen is more favorable than Agnico Eagle Mines.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
McEwen	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40
Agnico Eagle Mines	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.71

Summary

Agnico Eagle Mines beats McEwen on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does McEwen compare to First Majestic Silver?

McEwen (NYSE:MUX) and First Majestic Silver (NYSE:AG) are both materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and profitability.

17.0% of McEwen shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.2% of First Majestic Silver shares are held by institutional investors. 14.8% of McEwen shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of First Majestic Silver shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

McEwen has a net margin of 32.46% compared to First Majestic Silver's net margin of 21.18%. McEwen's return on equity of 13.48% beat First Majestic Silver's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
McEwen	32.46%	13.48%	9.13%
First Majestic Silver	21.18%	13.36%	9.20%

In the previous week, First Majestic Silver had 5 more articles in the media than McEwen. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for First Majestic Silver and 3 mentions for McEwen. First Majestic Silver's average media sentiment score of 1.21 beat McEwen's score of 0.44 indicating that First Majestic Silver is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
McEwen	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
First Majestic Silver	7 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

First Majestic Silver has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. McEwen is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than First Majestic Silver, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
McEwen	$197.55M	5.78	$34.43M	$1.26	14.77
First Majestic Silver	$1.26B	7.37	$164.92M	$0.71	26.49

McEwen has a beta of 1.26, indicating that its share price is 26% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, First Majestic Silver has a beta of 1, indicating that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.

McEwen presently has a consensus target price of $28.00, suggesting a potential upside of 50.50%. First Majestic Silver has a consensus target price of $23.83, suggesting a potential upside of 26.74%. Given McEwen's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe McEwen is more favorable than First Majestic Silver.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
McEwen	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40
First Majestic Silver	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.78

Summary

First Majestic Silver beats McEwen on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does McEwen compare to Alamos Gold?

McEwen (NYSE:MUX) and Alamos Gold (NYSE:AGI) are both materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and media sentiment.

17.0% of McEwen shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.3% of Alamos Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 14.8% of McEwen shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Alamos Gold shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Alamos Gold has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. Alamos Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McEwen, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
McEwen	$197.55M	5.78	$34.43M	$1.26	14.77
Alamos Gold	$1.81B	8.24	$885.80M	$2.77	12.86

McEwen presently has a consensus price target of $28.00, suggesting a potential upside of 50.50%. Alamos Gold has a consensus price target of $47.50, suggesting a potential upside of 33.30%. Given McEwen's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe McEwen is more favorable than Alamos Gold.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
McEwen	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40
Alamos Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80

In the previous week, Alamos Gold had 2 more articles in the media than McEwen. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Alamos Gold and 3 mentions for McEwen. Alamos Gold's average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat McEwen's score of 0.44 indicating that Alamos Gold is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
McEwen	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Alamos Gold	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Alamos Gold has a net margin of 52.64% compared to McEwen's net margin of 32.46%. Alamos Gold's return on equity of 19.28% beat McEwen's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
McEwen	32.46%	13.48%	9.13%
Alamos Gold	52.64%	19.28%	13.47%

McEwen has a beta of 1.26, meaning that its share price is 26% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alamos Gold has a beta of 0.61, meaning that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Alamos Gold beats McEwen on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does McEwen compare to Fortuna Mining?

McEwen (NYSE:MUX) and Fortuna Mining (NYSE:FSM) are both materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

McEwen presently has a consensus price target of $28.00, suggesting a potential upside of 50.50%. Fortuna Mining has a consensus price target of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 20.45%. Given McEwen's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe McEwen is more favorable than Fortuna Mining.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
McEwen	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40
Fortuna Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80

17.0% of McEwen shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.8% of Fortuna Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 14.8% of McEwen shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Fortuna Mining shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, McEwen had 1 more articles in the media than Fortuna Mining. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for McEwen and 2 mentions for Fortuna Mining. Fortuna Mining's average media sentiment score of 1.71 beat McEwen's score of 0.44 indicating that Fortuna Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
McEwen	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Fortuna Mining	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

McEwen has a beta of 1.26, indicating that its share price is 26% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fortuna Mining has a beta of 1.08, indicating that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

Fortuna Mining has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. Fortuna Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McEwen, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
McEwen	$197.55M	5.78	$34.43M	$1.26	14.77
Fortuna Mining	$947.06M	3.63	$287.47M	$1.18	9.85

McEwen has a net margin of 32.46% compared to Fortuna Mining's net margin of 31.99%. Fortuna Mining's return on equity of 17.48% beat McEwen's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
McEwen	32.46%	13.48%	9.13%
Fortuna Mining	31.99%	17.48%	12.88%

Summary

McEwen and Fortuna Mining tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does McEwen compare to Kinross Gold?

Kinross Gold (NYSE:KGC) and McEwen (NYSE:MUX) are both materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, risk, profitability, earnings and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Kinross Gold had 7 more articles in the media than McEwen. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Kinross Gold and 3 mentions for McEwen. Kinross Gold's average media sentiment score of 1.52 beat McEwen's score of 0.44 indicating that Kinross Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Kinross Gold	7 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
McEwen	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

63.7% of Kinross Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.0% of McEwen shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Kinross Gold shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 14.8% of McEwen shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Kinross Gold currently has a consensus price target of $38.43, suggesting a potential upside of 36.48%. McEwen has a consensus price target of $28.00, suggesting a potential upside of 50.50%. Given McEwen's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe McEwen is more favorable than Kinross Gold.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Kinross Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.85
McEwen	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40

Kinross Gold has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. Kinross Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McEwen, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Kinross Gold	$7.05B	4.73	$2.39B	$2.64	10.67
McEwen	$197.55M	5.78	$34.43M	$1.26	14.77

Kinross Gold has a net margin of 37.52% compared to McEwen's net margin of 32.46%. Kinross Gold's return on equity of 34.00% beat McEwen's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Kinross Gold	37.52%	34.00%	23.84%
McEwen	32.46%	13.48%	9.13%

Kinross Gold has a beta of 0.84, meaning that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, McEwen has a beta of 1.26, meaning that its share price is 26% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Kinross Gold beats McEwen on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get McEwen News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MUX and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

MUX vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	McEwen	Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$1.20B	$3.92B	$4.91B	$23.36B
Dividend Yield	N/A	5.18%	4.69%	3.58%
P/E Ratio	14.77	25.68	25.67	28.59
Price / Sales	5.78	28,253.82	16,802.51	97.85
Price / Cash	16.89	26.57	24.59	19.47
Price / Book	1.85	11.79	9.81	4.75
Net Income	$34.43M	$127.55M	$158.15M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-8.02%	-3.11%	-2.71%	-1.75%
1 Month Performance	-1.05%	8.26%	5.75%	-3.64%
1 Year Performance	31.76%	43.84%	34.74%	9.37%

McEwen Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
MUX McEwen	3.1363 of 5 stars	$18.61 -4.7%	$28.00 +50.5%	+34.5%	$1.20B	$197.55M	14.77	1,981	Analyst Upgrade Gap Down
AEM Agnico Eagle Mines	3.7469 of 5 stars	$205.58 +0.4%	$226.00 +9.9%	+28.7%	$104.30B	$11.91B	17.60	18,216	Gap Down
AG First Majestic Silver	4.4572 of 5 stars	$21.00 +0.1%	$23.83 +13.5%	+78.4%	$10.36B	$1.26B	29.59	5,100	Positive News
AGI Alamos Gold	4.9716 of 5 stars	$36.80 -0.5%	$47.50 +29.1%	+8.1%	$15.41B	$1.81B	13.29	3,234	Positive News
FSM Fortuna Mining	3.8556 of 5 stars	$12.34 +0.2%	$14.00 +13.5%	+38.9%	$3.65B	$947.06M	10.46	4,294	Positive News Gap Down

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:MUX) was last updated on 9/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

McEwen (MUX) Competitors

MUX vs. AEM, AG, AGI, FSM, and KGC

How does McEwen compare to Agnico Eagle Mines?

Summary

How does McEwen compare to First Majestic Silver?

Summary

How does McEwen compare to Alamos Gold?

Summary

How does McEwen compare to Fortuna Mining?

Summary

How does McEwen compare to Kinross Gold?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MUX vs. The Competition

McEwen Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

McEwen (MUX) Competitors

MUX vs. AEM, AG, AGI, FSM, and KGC

How does McEwen compare to Agnico Eagle Mines?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of MUX or AEM?

Which has more volatility and risk, MUX or AEM?

Is MUX or AEM more profitable?

Does the media prefer MUX or AEM?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, MUX or AEM?

Do analysts prefer MUX or AEM?

Summary

How does McEwen compare to First Majestic Silver?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in MUX or AG?

Is MUX or AG more profitable?

Does the media favor MUX or AG?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, MUX or AG?

Which has more volatility & risk, MUX or AG?

Do analysts prefer MUX or AG?

Summary

How does McEwen compare to Alamos Gold?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in MUX or AGI?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, MUX or AGI?

Do analysts recommend MUX or AGI?

Does the media refer more to MUX or AGI?

Is MUX or AGI more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, MUX or AGI?

Summary

How does McEwen compare to Fortuna Mining?

Do analysts recommend MUX or FSM?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of MUX or FSM?

Does the media favor MUX or FSM?

Which has more risk and volatility, MUX or FSM?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, MUX or FSM?

Is MUX or FSM more profitable?

Summary

How does McEwen compare to Kinross Gold?

Does the media prefer KGC or MUX?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in KGC or MUX?

Do analysts prefer KGC or MUX?

Which has better earnings and valuation, KGC or MUX?

Is KGC or MUX more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, KGC or MUX?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MUX vs. The Competition

McEwen Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools