McEwen (MUX) Competitors

In the previous week, Agnico Eagle Mines had 27 more articles in the media than McEwen. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for Agnico Eagle Mines and 2 mentions for McEwen. Agnico Eagle Mines' average media sentiment score of 1.21 beat McEwen's score of 0.73 indicating that Agnico Eagle Mines is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Agnico Eagle Mines has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. McEwen is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Agnico Eagle Mines, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

17.0% of McEwen shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.3% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are held by institutional investors. 14.8% of McEwen shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

McEwen currently has a consensus target price of $28.00, suggesting a potential upside of 36.19%. Agnico Eagle Mines has a consensus target price of $226.00, suggesting a potential upside of 9.05%. Given McEwen's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe McEwen is more favorable than Agnico Eagle Mines.

McEwen has a beta of 1.26, meaning that its stock price is 26% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Agnico Eagle Mines has a beta of 0.67, meaning that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

Agnico Eagle Mines has a net margin of 40.44% compared to McEwen's net margin of 32.46%. Agnico Eagle Mines' return on equity of 22.04% beat McEwen's return on equity.

McEwen pays an annual dividend of $0.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Agnico Eagle Mines pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. McEwen pays out 0.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Agnico Eagle Mines pays out 15.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

McEwen pays an annual dividend of $0.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. First Majestic Silver pays an annual dividend of $0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. McEwen pays out 0.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. First Majestic Silver pays out 8.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

First Majestic Silver has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. McEwen is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than First Majestic Silver, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

McEwen presently has a consensus price target of $28.00, indicating a potential upside of 36.19%. First Majestic Silver has a consensus price target of $23.83, indicating a potential upside of 11.11%. Given McEwen's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe McEwen is more favorable than First Majestic Silver.

McEwen has a net margin of 32.46% compared to First Majestic Silver's net margin of 21.18%. McEwen's return on equity of 13.48% beat First Majestic Silver's return on equity.

In the previous week, First Majestic Silver had 8 more articles in the media than McEwen. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for First Majestic Silver and 2 mentions for McEwen. First Majestic Silver's average media sentiment score of 1.53 beat McEwen's score of 0.73 indicating that First Majestic Silver is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

McEwen has a beta of 1.26, suggesting that its share price is 26% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, First Majestic Silver has a beta of 1, suggesting that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.

17.0% of McEwen shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.2% of First Majestic Silver shares are held by institutional investors. 14.8% of McEwen shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of First Majestic Silver shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Alamos Gold had 4 more articles in the media than McEwen. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Alamos Gold and 2 mentions for McEwen. Alamos Gold's average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat McEwen's score of 0.73 indicating that Alamos Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Alamos Gold has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. Alamos Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McEwen, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Alamos Gold has a net margin of 52.64% compared to McEwen's net margin of 32.46%. Alamos Gold's return on equity of 19.28% beat McEwen's return on equity.

64.3% of Alamos Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.0% of McEwen shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Alamos Gold shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.8% of McEwen shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Alamos Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. McEwen pays an annual dividend of $0.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Alamos Gold pays out 5.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. McEwen pays out 0.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Alamos Gold has a beta of 0.61, suggesting that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, McEwen has a beta of 1.26, suggesting that its share price is 26% more volatile than the broader market.

Alamos Gold presently has a consensus target price of $47.50, suggesting a potential upside of 25.73%. McEwen has a consensus target price of $28.00, suggesting a potential upside of 36.19%. Given McEwen's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe McEwen is more favorable than Alamos Gold.

McEwen has a net margin of 32.46% compared to Fortuna Mining's net margin of 31.99%. Fortuna Mining's return on equity of 17.48% beat McEwen's return on equity.

Fortuna Mining currently has a consensus target price of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 10.50%. McEwen has a consensus target price of $28.00, suggesting a potential upside of 36.19%. Given McEwen's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe McEwen is more favorable than Fortuna Mining.

33.8% of Fortuna Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.0% of McEwen shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Fortuna Mining shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 14.8% of McEwen shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Fortuna Mining has a beta of 1.08, indicating that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, McEwen has a beta of 1.26, indicating that its stock price is 26% more volatile than the broader market.

Fortuna Mining has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. Fortuna Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McEwen, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Fortuna Mining and Fortuna Mining both had 2 articles in the media. Fortuna Mining's average media sentiment score of 1.34 beat McEwen's score of 0.73 indicating that Fortuna Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.