Which has preferable valuation and earnings, AEM or MUX?

Agnico Eagle Mines has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. McEwen is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Agnico Eagle Mines, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Agnico Eagle Mines $14.53B 6.17 $4.46B $11.69 15.12 McEwen $197.55M 4.85 $34.43M $1.26 12.40

Is AEM or MUX more profitable?

Agnico Eagle Mines has a net margin of 40.44% compared to McEwen's net margin of 32.46%. Agnico Eagle Mines' return on equity of 22.04% beat McEwen's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Agnico Eagle Mines 40.44% 22.04% 16.22% McEwen 32.46% 13.48% 9.13%

Does the media prefer AEM or MUX?

In the previous week, Agnico Eagle Mines had 5 more articles in the media than McEwen. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Agnico Eagle Mines and 7 mentions for McEwen. McEwen's average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat Agnico Eagle Mines' score of 0.29 indicating that McEwen is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Agnico Eagle Mines 4 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 4 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral McEwen 1 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, AG or MUX?

First Majestic Silver has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. McEwen is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than First Majestic Silver, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio First Majestic Silver $1.26B 5.98 $164.92M $0.71 21.48 McEwen $197.55M 4.85 $34.43M $1.26 12.40

Does the media refer more to AG or MUX?

In the previous week, First Majestic Silver had 3 more articles in the media than McEwen. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for First Majestic Silver and 7 mentions for McEwen. McEwen's average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat First Majestic Silver's score of 0.13 indicating that McEwen is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment First Majestic Silver 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral McEwen 1 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has higher valuation and earnings, MUX or AGI?

Alamos Gold has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. Alamos Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McEwen, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio McEwen $197.55M 4.85 $34.43M $1.26 12.40 Alamos Gold $1.81B 7.07 $885.80M $2.77 11.03

Is MUX or AGI more profitable?

Alamos Gold has a net margin of 52.64% compared to McEwen's net margin of 32.46%. Alamos Gold's return on equity of 19.28% beat McEwen's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets McEwen 32.46% 13.48% 9.13% Alamos Gold 52.64% 19.28% 13.47%

Which has better valuation & earnings, FSM or MUX?

Fortuna Mining has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. Fortuna Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McEwen, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Fortuna Mining $947.06M 3.18 $287.47M $1.18 8.62 McEwen $197.55M 4.85 $34.43M $1.26 12.40

Is FSM or MUX more profitable?

McEwen has a net margin of 32.46% compared to Fortuna Mining's net margin of 31.99%. Fortuna Mining's return on equity of 17.48% beat McEwen's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Fortuna Mining 31.99% 17.48% 12.88% McEwen 32.46% 13.48% 9.13%

Does the media prefer FSM or MUX?

In the previous week, Fortuna Mining and Fortuna Mining both had 7 articles in the media. McEwen's average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat Fortuna Mining's score of 0.48 indicating that McEwen is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Fortuna Mining 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral McEwen 1 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, KGC or MUX?

Kinross Gold has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. Kinross Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McEwen, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Kinross Gold $7.05B 3.73 $2.39B $2.64 8.41 McEwen $197.55M 4.85 $34.43M $1.26 12.40

Is KGC or MUX more profitable?

Kinross Gold has a net margin of 37.52% compared to McEwen's net margin of 32.46%. Kinross Gold's return on equity of 34.00% beat McEwen's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Kinross Gold 37.52% 34.00% 23.84% McEwen 32.46% 13.48% 9.13%

Does the media prefer KGC or MUX?

In the previous week, McEwen had 2 more articles in the media than Kinross Gold. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for McEwen and 5 mentions for Kinross Gold. Kinross Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat McEwen's score of 0.54 indicating that Kinross Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Kinross Gold 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive McEwen 1 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

McEwen (MUX) Competitors

$15.54 -0.06 (-0.36%)

As of 09:48 AM Eastern

Compare

MUX vs. AEM, AG, AGI, FSM, and KGC

Should you buy McEwen stock or one of its competitors? McEwen's main competitors and comparable companies include Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM), First Majestic Silver (AG), Alamos Gold (AGI), Fortuna Mining (FSM), and Kinross Gold (KGC). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "metals & mining" industry.

How does McEwen compare to Agnico Eagle Mines?

Agnico Eagle Mines (NYSE:AEM) and McEwen (NYSE:MUX) are both materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, risk, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

Agnico Eagle Mines presently has a consensus price target of $225.62, suggesting a potential upside of 27.60%. McEwen has a consensus price target of $29.50, suggesting a potential upside of 88.80%. Given McEwen's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe McEwen is more favorable than Agnico Eagle Mines.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Agnico Eagle Mines	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.76
McEwen	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Agnico Eagle Mines has a beta of 0.64, indicating that its share price is 36% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, McEwen has a beta of 1.26, indicating that its share price is 26% more volatile than the broader market.

Agnico Eagle Mines has a net margin of 40.44% compared to McEwen's net margin of 32.46%. Agnico Eagle Mines' return on equity of 22.04% beat McEwen's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Agnico Eagle Mines	40.44%	22.04%	16.22%
McEwen	32.46%	13.48%	9.13%

Agnico Eagle Mines has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. McEwen is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Agnico Eagle Mines, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Agnico Eagle Mines	$14.53B	6.17	$4.46B	$11.69	15.12
McEwen	$197.55M	4.85	$34.43M	$1.26	12.40

In the previous week, Agnico Eagle Mines had 5 more articles in the media than McEwen. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Agnico Eagle Mines and 7 mentions for McEwen. McEwen's average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat Agnico Eagle Mines' score of 0.29 indicating that McEwen is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Agnico Eagle Mines	4 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	4 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
McEwen	1 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

68.3% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.0% of McEwen shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.8% of McEwen shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Agnico Eagle Mines beats McEwen on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does McEwen compare to First Majestic Silver?

First Majestic Silver (NYSE:AG) and McEwen (NYSE:MUX) are both materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

First Majestic Silver currently has a consensus price target of $24.00, indicating a potential upside of 57.35%. McEwen has a consensus price target of $29.50, indicating a potential upside of 88.80%. Given McEwen's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe McEwen is more favorable than First Majestic Silver.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
First Majestic Silver	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.57
McEwen	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

First Majestic Silver has a beta of 0.97, suggesting that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, McEwen has a beta of 1.26, suggesting that its stock price is 26% more volatile than the broader market.

McEwen has a net margin of 32.46% compared to First Majestic Silver's net margin of 21.18%. McEwen's return on equity of 13.48% beat First Majestic Silver's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
First Majestic Silver	21.18%	13.36%	9.20%
McEwen	32.46%	13.48%	9.13%

First Majestic Silver has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. McEwen is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than First Majestic Silver, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
First Majestic Silver	$1.26B	5.98	$164.92M	$0.71	21.48
McEwen	$197.55M	4.85	$34.43M	$1.26	12.40

In the previous week, First Majestic Silver had 3 more articles in the media than McEwen. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for First Majestic Silver and 7 mentions for McEwen. McEwen's average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat First Majestic Silver's score of 0.13 indicating that McEwen is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
First Majestic Silver	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
McEwen	1 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

27.2% of First Majestic Silver shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.0% of McEwen shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of First Majestic Silver shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 14.8% of McEwen shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

First Majestic Silver beats McEwen on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does McEwen compare to Alamos Gold?

McEwen (NYSE:MUX) and Alamos Gold (NYSE:AGI) are both materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, profitability, earnings, valuation and dividends.

Alamos Gold has a net margin of 52.64% compared to McEwen's net margin of 32.46%. Alamos Gold's return on equity of 19.28% beat McEwen's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
McEwen	32.46%	13.48%	9.13%
Alamos Gold	52.64%	19.28%	13.47%

McEwen currently has a consensus price target of $29.50, indicating a potential upside of 88.80%. Alamos Gold has a consensus price target of $47.50, indicating a potential upside of 55.44%. Given McEwen's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe McEwen is more favorable than Alamos Gold.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
McEwen	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Alamos Gold	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.78

In the previous week, McEwen had 7 more articles in the media than Alamos Gold. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for McEwen and 0 mentions for Alamos Gold. McEwen's average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat Alamos Gold's score of 0.33 indicating that McEwen is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
McEwen	Positive
Alamos Gold	Neutral

Alamos Gold has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. Alamos Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McEwen, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
McEwen	$197.55M	4.85	$34.43M	$1.26	12.40
Alamos Gold	$1.81B	7.07	$885.80M	$2.77	11.03

McEwen has a beta of 1.26, indicating that its stock price is 26% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alamos Gold has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

17.0% of McEwen shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.3% of Alamos Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.8% of McEwen shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Alamos Gold shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Alamos Gold beats McEwen on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does McEwen compare to Fortuna Mining?

Fortuna Mining (NYSE:FSM) and McEwen (NYSE:MUX) are both materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and risk.

In the previous week, Fortuna Mining and Fortuna Mining both had 7 articles in the media. McEwen's average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat Fortuna Mining's score of 0.48 indicating that McEwen is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Fortuna Mining	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
McEwen	1 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Fortuna Mining has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. Fortuna Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McEwen, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Fortuna Mining	$947.06M	3.18	$287.47M	$1.18	8.62
McEwen	$197.55M	4.85	$34.43M	$1.26	12.40

Fortuna Mining has a beta of 1.05, meaning that its share price is 5% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, McEwen has a beta of 1.26, meaning that its share price is 26% more volatile than the broader market.

33.8% of Fortuna Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.0% of McEwen shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Fortuna Mining shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.8% of McEwen shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

McEwen has a net margin of 32.46% compared to Fortuna Mining's net margin of 31.99%. Fortuna Mining's return on equity of 17.48% beat McEwen's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Fortuna Mining	31.99%	17.48%	12.88%
McEwen	32.46%	13.48%	9.13%

Fortuna Mining currently has a consensus target price of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 37.66%. McEwen has a consensus target price of $29.50, suggesting a potential upside of 88.80%. Given McEwen's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe McEwen is more favorable than Fortuna Mining.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Fortuna Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80
McEwen	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Summary

McEwen beats Fortuna Mining on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does McEwen compare to Kinross Gold?

Kinross Gold (NYSE:KGC) and McEwen (NYSE:MUX) are both materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

Kinross Gold has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. Kinross Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McEwen, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Kinross Gold	$7.05B	3.73	$2.39B	$2.64	8.41
McEwen	$197.55M	4.85	$34.43M	$1.26	12.40

Kinross Gold currently has a consensus target price of $38.89, suggesting a potential upside of 75.11%. McEwen has a consensus target price of $29.50, suggesting a potential upside of 88.80%. Given McEwen's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe McEwen is more favorable than Kinross Gold.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Kinross Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.94
McEwen	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Kinross Gold has a net margin of 37.52% compared to McEwen's net margin of 32.46%. Kinross Gold's return on equity of 34.00% beat McEwen's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Kinross Gold	37.52%	34.00%	23.84%
McEwen	32.46%	13.48%	9.13%

In the previous week, McEwen had 2 more articles in the media than Kinross Gold. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for McEwen and 5 mentions for Kinross Gold. Kinross Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat McEwen's score of 0.54 indicating that Kinross Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Kinross Gold	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
McEwen	1 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

63.7% of Kinross Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.0% of McEwen shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Kinross Gold shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.8% of McEwen shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Kinross Gold has a beta of 0.82, meaning that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, McEwen has a beta of 1.26, meaning that its stock price is 26% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Kinross Gold beats McEwen on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get McEwen News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MUX and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

MUX vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	McEwen	Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$1.04B	$3.74B	$4.71B	$23.07B
Dividend Yield	N/A	5.25%	4.77%	3.70%
P/E Ratio	12.40	22.11	22.27	24.82
Price / Sales	4.85	26,849.43	15,974.78	21.35
Price / Cash	14.60	26.94	24.84	36.37
Price / Book	1.56	11.59	9.64	4.66
Net Income	$34.43M	$127.18M	$159.17M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-9.93%	-3.09%	-2.59%	-1.40%
1 Month Performance	-15.91%	-6.40%	-5.79%	-3.92%
1 Year Performance	-27.50%	8.94%	8.88%	4.77%

McEwen Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
MUX McEwen	3.3817 of 5 stars	$15.54 -0.4%	$29.50 +89.8%	-23.0%	$958.93M	$197.55M	12.40	1,981	Gap Down
AEM Agnico Eagle Mines	4.497 of 5 stars	$186.07 +1.5%	$227.15 +22.1%	+3.2%	$94.42B	$14.53B	15.93	18,216	Analyst Upgrade Analyst Revision Gap Down
AG First Majestic Silver	3.8438 of 5 stars	$17.65 +0.8%	$24.75 +40.3%	+10.4%	$8.73B	$1.26B	24.95	5,100	Analyst Revision Gap Down
AGI Alamos Gold	4.791 of 5 stars	$32.77 +1.4%	$47.50 +45.0%	-10.4%	$13.75B	$1.81B	11.87	3,234
FSM Fortuna Mining	3.7475 of 5 stars	$11.22 +0.7%	$14.00 +24.8%	+10.9%	$3.33B	$947.06M	9.53	4,294	Analyst Revision Gap Down

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:MUX) was last updated on 10/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

McEwen (MUX) Competitors

MUX vs. AEM, AG, AGI, FSM, and KGC

How does McEwen compare to Agnico Eagle Mines?

Summary

How does McEwen compare to First Majestic Silver?

Summary

How does McEwen compare to Alamos Gold?

Summary

How does McEwen compare to Fortuna Mining?

Summary

How does McEwen compare to Kinross Gold?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MUX vs. The Competition

McEwen Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

McEwen (MUX) Competitors

MUX vs. AEM, AG, AGI, FSM, and KGC

How does McEwen compare to Agnico Eagle Mines?

Do analysts prefer AEM or MUX?

Which has more volatility & risk, AEM or MUX?

Is AEM or MUX more profitable?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, AEM or MUX?

Does the media prefer AEM or MUX?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of AEM or MUX?

Summary

How does McEwen compare to First Majestic Silver?

Do analysts recommend AG or MUX?

Which has more risk & volatility, AG or MUX?

Is AG or MUX more profitable?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, AG or MUX?

Does the media refer more to AG or MUX?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in AG or MUX?

Summary

How does McEwen compare to Alamos Gold?

Is MUX or AGI more profitable?

Do analysts recommend MUX or AGI?

Does the media favor MUX or AGI?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, MUX or AGI?

Which has more volatility and risk, MUX or AGI?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in MUX or AGI?

Summary

How does McEwen compare to Fortuna Mining?

Does the media prefer FSM or MUX?

Which has better valuation & earnings, FSM or MUX?

Which has more risk & volatility, FSM or MUX?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of FSM or MUX?

Is FSM or MUX more profitable?

Do analysts recommend FSM or MUX?

Summary

How does McEwen compare to Kinross Gold?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, KGC or MUX?

Do analysts recommend KGC or MUX?

Is KGC or MUX more profitable?

Does the media prefer KGC or MUX?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of KGC or MUX?

Which has more risk and volatility, KGC or MUX?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MUX vs. The Competition

McEwen Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools