Which has higher earnings and valuation, MUX or RGLD?

Royal Gold has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. McEwen is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Royal Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio McEwen $197.55M 5.39 $34.43M $1.18 15.12 Royal Gold $1.03B 16.87 $467.27M $8.39 24.41

Is MUX or RGLD more profitable?

Royal Gold has a net margin of 48.59% compared to McEwen's net margin of 31.40%. McEwen's return on equity of 13.65% beat Royal Gold's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets McEwen 31.40% 13.65% 9.05% Royal Gold 48.59% 12.63% 9.99%

Does the media refer more to MUX or RGLD?

In the previous week, Royal Gold had 1 more articles in the media than McEwen. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Royal Gold and 7 mentions for McEwen. Royal Gold's average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat McEwen's score of 0.44 indicating that Royal Gold is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment McEwen 1 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Royal Gold 5 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, AEM or MUX?

Agnico Eagle Mines has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. Agnico Eagle Mines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McEwen, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Agnico Eagle Mines $11.91B 6.71 $4.46B $10.64 15.00 McEwen $197.55M 5.39 $34.43M $1.18 15.12

Is AEM or MUX more profitable?

Agnico Eagle Mines has a net margin of 39.46% compared to McEwen's net margin of 31.40%. Agnico Eagle Mines' return on equity of 21.09% beat McEwen's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Agnico Eagle Mines 39.46% 21.09% 15.27% McEwen 31.40% 13.65% 9.05%

Does the media prefer AEM or MUX?

In the previous week, Agnico Eagle Mines had 13 more articles in the media than McEwen. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Agnico Eagle Mines and 7 mentions for McEwen. Agnico Eagle Mines' average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat McEwen's score of 0.44 indicating that Agnico Eagle Mines is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Agnico Eagle Mines 17 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive McEwen 1 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has better valuation and earnings, AG or MUX?

First Majestic Silver has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. McEwen is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than First Majestic Silver, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio First Majestic Silver $1.26B 6.48 $164.92M $0.60 27.52 McEwen $197.55M 5.39 $34.43M $1.18 15.12

Does the media prefer AG or MUX?

In the previous week, McEwen had 4 more articles in the media than First Majestic Silver. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for McEwen and 3 mentions for First Majestic Silver. First Majestic Silver's average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat McEwen's score of 0.44 indicating that First Majestic Silver is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment First Majestic Silver 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive McEwen 1 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has higher earnings and valuation, MUX or AGI?

Alamos Gold has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. Alamos Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McEwen, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio McEwen $197.55M 5.39 $34.43M $1.18 15.12 Alamos Gold $1.81B 8.12 $885.80M $2.51 13.93

Is MUX or AGI more profitable?

Alamos Gold has a net margin of 51.24% compared to McEwen's net margin of 31.40%. Alamos Gold's return on equity of 18.03% beat McEwen's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets McEwen 31.40% 13.65% 9.05% Alamos Gold 51.24% 18.03% 12.42%

Does the media refer more to MUX or AGI?

In the previous week, McEwen had 6 more articles in the media than Alamos Gold. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for McEwen and 1 mentions for Alamos Gold. McEwen's average media sentiment score of 0.44 beat Alamos Gold's score of 0.33 indicating that McEwen is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment McEwen 1 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Alamos Gold 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, FSM or MUX?

Fortuna Mining has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. Fortuna Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McEwen, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Fortuna Mining $947.06M 2.75 $287.47M $1.06 8.11 McEwen $197.55M 5.39 $34.43M $1.18 15.12

Is FSM or MUX more profitable?

McEwen has a net margin of 31.40% compared to Fortuna Mining's net margin of 31.07%. Fortuna Mining's return on equity of 16.26% beat McEwen's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Fortuna Mining 31.07% 16.26% 11.95% McEwen 31.40% 13.65% 9.05%

Does the media prefer FSM or MUX?

In the previous week, McEwen had 6 more articles in the media than Fortuna Mining. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for McEwen and 1 mentions for Fortuna Mining. McEwen's average media sentiment score of 0.44 beat Fortuna Mining's score of 0.00 indicating that McEwen is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Fortuna Mining 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral McEwen 1 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

McEwen (MUX) Competitors

$17.84 -0.55 (-3.00%)

Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$17.79 -0.05 (-0.27%)

As of 07:58 PM Eastern

Compare

MUX vs. RGLD, AEM, AG, AGI, and FSM

Should you buy McEwen stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares McEwen with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with McEwen include Royal Gold (RGLD), Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM), First Majestic Silver (AG), Alamos Gold (AGI), and Fortuna Mining (FSM). These companies are all part of the "basic materials" sector.

How does McEwen compare to Royal Gold?

McEwen (NYSE:MUX) and Royal Gold (NASDAQ:RGLD) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, dividends and analyst recommendations.

McEwen presently has a consensus price target of $29.83, indicating a potential upside of 67.25%. Royal Gold has a consensus price target of $273.64, indicating a potential upside of 33.62%. Given McEwen's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe McEwen is more favorable than Royal Gold.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
McEwen	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Royal Gold	2 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Royal Gold has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. McEwen is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Royal Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
McEwen	$197.55M	5.39	$34.43M	$1.18	15.12
Royal Gold	$1.03B	16.87	$467.27M	$8.39	24.41

In the previous week, Royal Gold had 1 more articles in the media than McEwen. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Royal Gold and 7 mentions for McEwen. Royal Gold's average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat McEwen's score of 0.44 indicating that Royal Gold is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
McEwen	1 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Royal Gold	5 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Royal Gold has a net margin of 48.59% compared to McEwen's net margin of 31.40%. McEwen's return on equity of 13.65% beat Royal Gold's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
McEwen	31.40%	13.65%	9.05%
Royal Gold	48.59%	12.63%	9.99%

McEwen has a beta of 1.17, suggesting that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Royal Gold has a beta of 0.41, suggesting that its stock price is 59% less volatile than the broader market.

17.0% of McEwen shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.7% of Royal Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.8% of McEwen shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Royal Gold shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Royal Gold beats McEwen on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does McEwen compare to Agnico Eagle Mines?

Agnico Eagle Mines (NYSE:AEM) and McEwen (NYSE:MUX) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

Agnico Eagle Mines currently has a consensus target price of $236.08, indicating a potential upside of 47.88%. McEwen has a consensus target price of $29.83, indicating a potential upside of 67.25%. Given McEwen's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe McEwen is more favorable than Agnico Eagle Mines.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Agnico Eagle Mines	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.76
McEwen	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

68.3% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.0% of McEwen shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.8% of McEwen shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Agnico Eagle Mines has a beta of 0.56, suggesting that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, McEwen has a beta of 1.17, suggesting that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the broader market.

Agnico Eagle Mines has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. Agnico Eagle Mines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McEwen, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Agnico Eagle Mines	$11.91B	6.71	$4.46B	$10.64	15.00
McEwen	$197.55M	5.39	$34.43M	$1.18	15.12

In the previous week, Agnico Eagle Mines had 13 more articles in the media than McEwen. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Agnico Eagle Mines and 7 mentions for McEwen. Agnico Eagle Mines' average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat McEwen's score of 0.44 indicating that Agnico Eagle Mines is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Agnico Eagle Mines	17 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
McEwen	1 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Agnico Eagle Mines has a net margin of 39.46% compared to McEwen's net margin of 31.40%. Agnico Eagle Mines' return on equity of 21.09% beat McEwen's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Agnico Eagle Mines	39.46%	21.09%	15.27%
McEwen	31.40%	13.65%	9.05%

Summary

Agnico Eagle Mines beats McEwen on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does McEwen compare to First Majestic Silver?

First Majestic Silver (NYSE:AG) and McEwen (NYSE:MUX) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, dividends and valuation.

First Majestic Silver has a beta of 0.86, suggesting that its share price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, McEwen has a beta of 1.17, suggesting that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market.

27.2% of First Majestic Silver shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.0% of McEwen shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of First Majestic Silver shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 14.8% of McEwen shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, McEwen had 4 more articles in the media than First Majestic Silver. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for McEwen and 3 mentions for First Majestic Silver. First Majestic Silver's average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat McEwen's score of 0.44 indicating that First Majestic Silver is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
First Majestic Silver	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
McEwen	1 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

First Majestic Silver currently has a consensus price target of $25.25, indicating a potential upside of 52.95%. McEwen has a consensus price target of $29.83, indicating a potential upside of 67.25%. Given McEwen's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe McEwen is more favorable than First Majestic Silver.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
First Majestic Silver	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
McEwen	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

McEwen has a net margin of 31.40% compared to First Majestic Silver's net margin of 19.51%. McEwen's return on equity of 13.65% beat First Majestic Silver's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
First Majestic Silver	19.51%	11.19%	7.77%
McEwen	31.40%	13.65%	9.05%

First Majestic Silver has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. McEwen is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than First Majestic Silver, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
First Majestic Silver	$1.26B	6.48	$164.92M	$0.60	27.52
McEwen	$197.55M	5.39	$34.43M	$1.18	15.12

Summary

First Majestic Silver and McEwen tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does McEwen compare to Alamos Gold?

McEwen (NYSE:MUX) and Alamos Gold (NYSE:AGI) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

McEwen currently has a consensus target price of $29.83, indicating a potential upside of 67.25%. Alamos Gold has a consensus target price of $50.67, indicating a potential upside of 44.90%. Given McEwen's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe McEwen is more favorable than Alamos Gold.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
McEwen	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Alamos Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Alamos Gold has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. Alamos Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McEwen, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
McEwen	$197.55M	5.39	$34.43M	$1.18	15.12
Alamos Gold	$1.81B	8.12	$885.80M	$2.51	13.93

In the previous week, McEwen had 6 more articles in the media than Alamos Gold. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for McEwen and 1 mentions for Alamos Gold. McEwen's average media sentiment score of 0.44 beat Alamos Gold's score of 0.33 indicating that McEwen is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
McEwen	1 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Alamos Gold	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Alamos Gold has a net margin of 51.24% compared to McEwen's net margin of 31.40%. Alamos Gold's return on equity of 18.03% beat McEwen's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
McEwen	31.40%	13.65%	9.05%
Alamos Gold	51.24%	18.03%	12.42%

McEwen has a beta of 1.17, meaning that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alamos Gold has a beta of 0.49, meaning that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market.

17.0% of McEwen shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.3% of Alamos Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.8% of McEwen shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Alamos Gold shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Alamos Gold beats McEwen on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does McEwen compare to Fortuna Mining?

Fortuna Mining (NYSE:FSM) and McEwen (NYSE:MUX) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, risk and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, McEwen had 6 more articles in the media than Fortuna Mining. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for McEwen and 1 mentions for Fortuna Mining. McEwen's average media sentiment score of 0.44 beat Fortuna Mining's score of 0.00 indicating that McEwen is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Fortuna Mining	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
McEwen	1 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Fortuna Mining has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen. Fortuna Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McEwen, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Fortuna Mining	$947.06M	2.75	$287.47M	$1.06	8.11
McEwen	$197.55M	5.39	$34.43M	$1.18	15.12

McEwen has a net margin of 31.40% compared to Fortuna Mining's net margin of 31.07%. Fortuna Mining's return on equity of 16.26% beat McEwen's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Fortuna Mining	31.07%	16.26%	11.95%
McEwen	31.40%	13.65%	9.05%

Fortuna Mining presently has a consensus target price of $11.00, indicating a potential upside of 27.98%. McEwen has a consensus target price of $29.83, indicating a potential upside of 67.25%. Given McEwen's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe McEwen is more favorable than Fortuna Mining.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Fortuna Mining	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.60
McEwen	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

Fortuna Mining has a beta of 0.94, meaning that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, McEwen has a beta of 1.17, meaning that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the broader market.

33.8% of Fortuna Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.0% of McEwen shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Fortuna Mining shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 14.8% of McEwen shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

McEwen beats Fortuna Mining on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get McEwen News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MUX and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

MUX vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	McEwen	MINING Industry	Materials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$1.10B	$9.46B	$4.65B	$23.08B
Dividend Yield	N/A	1.72%	4.99%	4.10%
P/E Ratio	15.12	14.57	21.87	30.59
Price / Sales	5.39	171.59	6,566.85	12.89
Price / Cash	15.91	35.79	24.18	18.46
Price / Book	1.78	4.03	8.83	4.65
Net Income	$34.43M	$319.20M	$156.92M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-20.03%	-15.27%	-6.06%	-0.71%
1 Month Performance	-26.28%	-15.65%	-6.21%	0.06%
1 Year Performance	87.08%	77.87%	54.88%	21.50%

McEwen Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
MUX McEwen	3.4454 of 5 stars	$17.84 -3.0%	$29.83 +67.2%	+96.6%	$1.10B	$197.55M	15.12	430
RGLD Royal Gold	4.7764 of 5 stars	$215.88 -3.8%	$273.64 +26.8%	+16.9%	$18.49B	$1.31B	26.01	30	Gap Down
AEM Agnico Eagle Mines	4.818 of 5 stars	$176.24 -3.8%	$236.08 +34.0%	+37.4%	$91.66B	$13.54B	16.67	18,216	Positive News
AG First Majestic Silver	4.797 of 5 stars	$20.66 -2.0%	$25.25 +22.2%	+107.8%	$10.41B	$1.26B	35.11	5,100	Positive News
AGI Alamos Gold	4.8619 of 5 stars	$39.41 -3.4%	$50.67 +28.6%	+34.3%	$17.13B	$1.81B	15.88	3,234

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:MUX) was last updated on 6/9/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

McEwen (MUX) Competitors

MUX vs. RGLD, AEM, AG, AGI, and FSM

How does McEwen compare to Royal Gold?

Summary

How does McEwen compare to Agnico Eagle Mines?

Summary

How does McEwen compare to First Majestic Silver?

Summary

How does McEwen compare to Alamos Gold?

Summary

How does McEwen compare to Fortuna Mining?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MUX vs. The Competition

McEwen Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

McEwen (MUX) Competitors

MUX vs. RGLD, AEM, AG, AGI, and FSM

How does McEwen compare to Royal Gold?

Do analysts recommend MUX or RGLD?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, MUX or RGLD?

Does the media refer more to MUX or RGLD?

Is MUX or RGLD more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, MUX or RGLD?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in MUX or RGLD?

Summary

How does McEwen compare to Agnico Eagle Mines?

Do analysts rate AEM or MUX?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in AEM or MUX?

Which has more risk & volatility, AEM or MUX?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, AEM or MUX?

Does the media prefer AEM or MUX?

Is AEM or MUX more profitable?

Summary

How does McEwen compare to First Majestic Silver?

Which has more risk and volatility, AG or MUX?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in AG or MUX?

Does the media prefer AG or MUX?

Do analysts rate AG or MUX?

Is AG or MUX more profitable?

Which has better valuation and earnings, AG or MUX?

Summary

How does McEwen compare to Alamos Gold?

Do analysts recommend MUX or AGI?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, MUX or AGI?

Does the media refer more to MUX or AGI?

Is MUX or AGI more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, MUX or AGI?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in MUX or AGI?

Summary

How does McEwen compare to Fortuna Mining?

Does the media prefer FSM or MUX?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, FSM or MUX?

Is FSM or MUX more profitable?

Do analysts prefer FSM or MUX?

Which has more volatility and risk, FSM or MUX?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in FSM or MUX?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MUX vs. The Competition

McEwen Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools