Free Trial

Hycroft Mining (HYMC) Competitors

Hycroft Mining logo
$18.70 -0.10 (-0.53%)
As of 10:07 AM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

HYMC vs. SSRM, AUGO, TFPM, OGC, and CGAU

Should you buy Hycroft Mining stock or one of its competitors? Hycroft Mining's main competitors and comparable companies include Silver Standard Resources (SSRM), Aura Minerals (AUGO), Triple Flag Precious Metals (TFPM), Oceanagold (OGC), and Centerra Gold (CGAU). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "gold" industry.

How does Hycroft Mining compare to Silver Standard Resources?

Silver Standard Resources (NASDAQ:SSRM) and Hycroft Mining (NASDAQ:HYMC) are both materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Silver Standard Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Hycroft Mining. Hycroft Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Silver Standard Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Silver Standard Resources$1.63B4.19$395.75M$1.1030.83
Hycroft MiningN/AN/A-$40.66M-$0.99N/A

Silver Standard Resources has a net margin of 12.30% compared to Hycroft Mining's net margin of 0.00%. Silver Standard Resources' return on equity of 16.17% beat Hycroft Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Silver Standard Resources12.30% 16.17% 11.84%
Hycroft Mining N/A -46.86%-32.63%

68.3% of Silver Standard Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.4% of Hycroft Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Silver Standard Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Hycroft Mining shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Silver Standard Resources had 7 more articles in the media than Hycroft Mining. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Silver Standard Resources and 0 mentions for Hycroft Mining. Silver Standard Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.73 beat Hycroft Mining's score of 0.54 indicating that Silver Standard Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Silver Standard Resources Positive
Hycroft Mining Positive

Silver Standard Resources has a beta of -0.1, suggesting that its stock price is 110% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hycroft Mining has a beta of 2.78, suggesting that its stock price is 178% more volatile than the broader market.

Silver Standard Resources presently has a consensus target price of $42.80, suggesting a potential upside of 26.22%. Hycroft Mining has a consensus target price of $25.00, suggesting a potential upside of 32.98%. Given Hycroft Mining's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Hycroft Mining is more favorable than Silver Standard Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Silver Standard Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.91
Hycroft Mining
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

Silver Standard Resources beats Hycroft Mining on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hycroft Mining compare to Aura Minerals?

Hycroft Mining (NASDAQ:HYMC) and Aura Minerals (NASDAQ:AUGO) are both materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends and profitability.

Hycroft Mining has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Aura Minerals. Hycroft Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aura Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hycroft MiningN/AN/A-$40.66M-$0.99N/A
Aura Minerals$1.29B5.54-$79.34M$3.5424.06

7.4% of Hycroft Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Hycroft Mining shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Aura Minerals has a net margin of 23.18% compared to Hycroft Mining's net margin of 0.00%. Aura Minerals' return on equity of 103.62% beat Hycroft Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hycroft MiningN/A -46.86% -32.63%
Aura Minerals 23.18%103.62%21.84%

In the previous week, Aura Minerals had 9 more articles in the media than Hycroft Mining. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Aura Minerals and 0 mentions for Hycroft Mining. Aura Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Hycroft Mining's score of 0.54 indicating that Aura Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Hycroft Mining Positive
Aura Minerals Positive

Hycroft Mining has a beta of 2.78, suggesting that its share price is 178% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aura Minerals has a beta of 0.48, suggesting that its share price is 52% less volatile than the broader market.

Hycroft Mining currently has a consensus target price of $25.00, indicating a potential upside of 32.98%. Aura Minerals has a consensus target price of $86.95, indicating a potential upside of 2.09%. Given Hycroft Mining's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Hycroft Mining is more favorable than Aura Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hycroft Mining
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Aura Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

Summary

Aura Minerals beats Hycroft Mining on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hycroft Mining compare to Triple Flag Precious Metals?

Hycroft Mining (NASDAQ:HYMC) and Triple Flag Precious Metals (NYSE:TFPM) are both materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, valuation and risk.

Hycroft Mining currently has a consensus target price of $25.00, indicating a potential upside of 32.98%. Triple Flag Precious Metals has a consensus target price of $39.25, indicating a potential upside of 28.79%. Given Hycroft Mining's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Hycroft Mining is more favorable than Triple Flag Precious Metals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hycroft Mining
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Triple Flag Precious Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60

7.4% of Hycroft Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.9% of Triple Flag Precious Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Hycroft Mining shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Triple Flag Precious Metals has a net margin of 84.32% compared to Hycroft Mining's net margin of 0.00%. Triple Flag Precious Metals' return on equity of 14.09% beat Hycroft Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hycroft MiningN/A -46.86% -32.63%
Triple Flag Precious Metals 84.32%14.09%13.64%

In the previous week, Triple Flag Precious Metals had 5 more articles in the media than Hycroft Mining. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Triple Flag Precious Metals and 0 mentions for Hycroft Mining. Triple Flag Precious Metals' average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat Hycroft Mining's score of 0.54 indicating that Triple Flag Precious Metals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Hycroft Mining Positive
Triple Flag Precious Metals Very Positive

Triple Flag Precious Metals has higher revenue and earnings than Hycroft Mining. Hycroft Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Triple Flag Precious Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hycroft MiningN/AN/A-$40.66M-$0.99N/A
Triple Flag Precious Metals$388.70M16.15$240.01M$1.9915.32

Hycroft Mining has a beta of 2.78, suggesting that its stock price is 178% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Triple Flag Precious Metals has a beta of -0.13, suggesting that its stock price is 113% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Triple Flag Precious Metals beats Hycroft Mining on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hycroft Mining compare to Oceanagold?

Oceanagold (NYSE:OGC) and Hycroft Mining (NASDAQ:HYMC) are both materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings, media sentiment and risk.

Oceanagold has a net margin of 35.14% compared to Hycroft Mining's net margin of 0.00%. Oceanagold's return on equity of 36.44% beat Hycroft Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Oceanagold35.14% 36.44% 26.57%
Hycroft Mining N/A -46.86%-32.63%

In the previous week, Oceanagold had 2 more articles in the media than Hycroft Mining. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Oceanagold and 0 mentions for Hycroft Mining. Hycroft Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat Oceanagold's score of 0.20 indicating that Hycroft Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Oceanagold Neutral
Hycroft Mining Positive

7.4% of Hycroft Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Hycroft Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Hycroft Mining has a consensus target price of $25.00, suggesting a potential upside of 32.98%. Given Hycroft Mining's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Hycroft Mining is more favorable than Oceanagold.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Oceanagold
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25
Hycroft Mining
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Oceanagold has higher revenue and earnings than Hycroft Mining. Hycroft Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oceanagold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Oceanagold$1.89B3.12$628.70M$1.9913.39
Hycroft MiningN/AN/A-$40.66M-$0.99N/A

Summary

Oceanagold beats Hycroft Mining on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hycroft Mining compare to Centerra Gold?

Centerra Gold (NYSE:CGAU) and Hycroft Mining (NASDAQ:HYMC) are both materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, dividends, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Centerra Gold had 11 more articles in the media than Hycroft Mining. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Centerra Gold and 0 mentions for Hycroft Mining. Hycroft Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat Centerra Gold's score of 0.38 indicating that Hycroft Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Centerra Gold Neutral
Hycroft Mining Positive

Centerra Gold has a beta of 0.84, meaning that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hycroft Mining has a beta of 2.78, meaning that its stock price is 178% more volatile than the broader market.

55.4% of Centerra Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.4% of Hycroft Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Centerra Gold shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Hycroft Mining shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Centerra Gold presently has a consensus target price of $21.00, suggesting a potential downside of 2.70%. Hycroft Mining has a consensus target price of $25.00, suggesting a potential upside of 32.98%. Given Hycroft Mining's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Hycroft Mining is more favorable than Centerra Gold.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Centerra Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71
Hycroft Mining
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Centerra Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Hycroft Mining. Hycroft Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Centerra Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Centerra Gold$1.38B3.05$583.99M$3.136.90
Hycroft MiningN/AN/A-$40.66M-$0.99N/A

Centerra Gold has a net margin of 36.92% compared to Hycroft Mining's net margin of 0.00%. Centerra Gold's return on equity of 15.35% beat Hycroft Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Centerra Gold36.92% 15.35% 10.73%
Hycroft Mining N/A -46.86%-32.63%

Summary

Centerra Gold beats Hycroft Mining on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Hycroft Mining News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for HYMC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding HYMC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

HYMC vs. The Competition

MetricHycroft MiningMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$1.74B$3.75B$4.72B$13.45B
Dividend YieldN/A5.24%4.76%17.38%
P/E Ratio-18.8925.0624.9026.40
Price / SalesN/A27,297.2716,265.9087.11
Price / CashN/A26.3824.3934.70
Price / Book7.2811.339.466.43
Net Income-$40.66M$127.14M$159.30M$381.07M
7 Day Performance-3.50%-1.26%-1.11%0.04%
1 Month Performance-17.58%-5.29%-5.01%-4.20%
1 Year Performance191.75%18.81%16.13%2.03%

Hycroft Mining Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
HYMC
Hycroft Mining
1.9609 of 5 stars
$18.70
-0.5%
$25.00
+33.7%
+201.3%$1.74BN/AN/A51
SSRM
Silver Standard Resources
4.542 of 5 stars
$33.66
-0.5%
$42.40
+26.0%
+45.2%$6.78B$1.63B30.592,900
AUGO
Aura Minerals
3.7788 of 5 stars
$78.82
+1.4%
$86.95
+10.3%
+135.7%$6.60B$921.73M22.261,462
TFPM
Triple Flag Precious Metals
4.2621 of 5 stars
$30.79
-0.1%
$39.25
+27.5%
+2.4%$6.34B$388.70M15.4720
OGC
Oceanagold
2.4205 of 5 stars
$27.58
+2.4%
N/AN/A$6.10B$1.89B13.855,400

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:HYMC) was last updated on 10/6/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners