Go Pro

Hycroft Mining (HYMC) Competitors

Hycroft Mining logo
$18.73 +0.30 (+1.64%)
As of 10:36 AM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

HYMC vs. SBSW, OR, SKE, CGAU, and SA

Should you buy Hycroft Mining stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Hycroft Mining with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Hycroft Mining include Sibanye Gold (SBSW), OR Royalties (OR), Skeena Resources (SKE), Centerra Gold (CGAU), and Seabridge Gold (SA). These companies are all part of the "precious metals" industry.

How does Hycroft Mining compare to Sibanye Gold?

Hycroft Mining (NASDAQ:HYMC) and Sibanye Gold (NYSE:SBSW) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, valuation and earnings.

Sibanye Gold's return on equity of 0.00% beat Hycroft Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hycroft MiningN/A -65.73% -33.36%
Sibanye Gold N/A N/A N/A

Hycroft Mining has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Sibanye Gold.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hycroft MiningN/AN/A-$40.66M-$1.19N/A
Sibanye Gold$7.25B0.78-$289.58MN/AN/A

Hycroft Mining has a beta of 2.71, meaning that its stock price is 171% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sibanye Gold has a beta of 0.69, meaning that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

Hycroft Mining presently has a consensus target price of $28.00, suggesting a potential upside of 53.28%. Sibanye Gold has a consensus target price of $17.93, suggesting a potential upside of 125.66%. Given Sibanye Gold's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Sibanye Gold is more favorable than Hycroft Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hycroft Mining
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Sibanye Gold
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

7.4% of Hycroft Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.9% of Sibanye Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Hycroft Mining shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Sibanye Gold shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Hycroft Mining and Hycroft Mining both had 7 articles in the media. Hycroft Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Sibanye Gold's score of -0.10 indicating that Hycroft Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Hycroft Mining
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Sibanye Gold
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Sibanye Gold beats Hycroft Mining on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hycroft Mining compare to OR Royalties?

OR Royalties (NYSE:OR) and Hycroft Mining (NASDAQ:HYMC) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

OR Royalties has higher revenue and earnings than Hycroft Mining. Hycroft Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than OR Royalties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
OR Royalties$277.37M18.80$206.09M$1.3420.78
Hycroft MiningN/AN/A-$40.66M-$1.19N/A

OR Royalties has a beta of 0.74, suggesting that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hycroft Mining has a beta of 2.71, suggesting that its stock price is 171% more volatile than the broader market.

OR Royalties has a net margin of 78.09% compared to Hycroft Mining's net margin of 0.00%. OR Royalties' return on equity of 15.10% beat Hycroft Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
OR Royalties78.09% 15.10% 13.77%
Hycroft Mining N/A -65.73%-33.36%

OR Royalties currently has a consensus target price of $40.50, suggesting a potential upside of 45.44%. Hycroft Mining has a consensus target price of $28.00, suggesting a potential upside of 53.28%. Given Hycroft Mining's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Hycroft Mining is more favorable than OR Royalties.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
OR Royalties
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56
Hycroft Mining
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, OR Royalties had 2 more articles in the media than Hycroft Mining. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for OR Royalties and 7 mentions for Hycroft Mining. Hycroft Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat OR Royalties' score of 0.25 indicating that Hycroft Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
OR Royalties
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Hycroft Mining
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

68.5% of OR Royalties shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.4% of Hycroft Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of OR Royalties shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Hycroft Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

OR Royalties beats Hycroft Mining on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hycroft Mining compare to Skeena Resources?

Skeena Resources (NYSE:SKE) and Hycroft Mining (NASDAQ:HYMC) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, valuation and risk.

Skeena Resources has a beta of 1.14, meaning that its share price is 14% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hycroft Mining has a beta of 2.71, meaning that its share price is 171% more volatile than the broader market.

Skeena Resources' return on equity of -46.80% beat Hycroft Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Skeena ResourcesN/A -46.80% -8.37%
Hycroft Mining N/A -65.73%-33.36%

Hycroft Mining has a consensus target price of $28.00, suggesting a potential upside of 53.28%. Given Hycroft Mining's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Hycroft Mining is more favorable than Skeena Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Skeena Resources
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57
Hycroft Mining
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Skeena Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hycroft Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Skeena ResourcesN/AN/A-$130.86M-$1.51N/A
Hycroft MiningN/AN/A-$40.66M-$1.19N/A

In the previous week, Hycroft Mining had 6 more articles in the media than Skeena Resources. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Hycroft Mining and 1 mentions for Skeena Resources. Hycroft Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Skeena Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Hycroft Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Skeena Resources
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Hycroft Mining
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

45.2% of Skeena Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.4% of Hycroft Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Skeena Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Hycroft Mining shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Skeena Resources and Hycroft Mining tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hycroft Mining compare to Centerra Gold?

Centerra Gold (NYSE:CGAU) and Hycroft Mining (NASDAQ:HYMC) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment and profitability.

Centerra Gold has a net margin of 40.32% compared to Hycroft Mining's net margin of 0.00%. Centerra Gold's return on equity of 14.90% beat Hycroft Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Centerra Gold40.32% 14.90% 10.52%
Hycroft Mining N/A -65.73%-33.36%

Centerra Gold presently has a consensus target price of $17.50, indicating a potential upside of 17.14%. Hycroft Mining has a consensus target price of $28.00, indicating a potential upside of 53.28%. Given Hycroft Mining's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Hycroft Mining is more favorable than Centerra Gold.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Centerra Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63
Hycroft Mining
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, Centerra Gold and Centerra Gold both had 7 articles in the media. Centerra Gold's average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat Hycroft Mining's score of 0.82 indicating that Centerra Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Centerra Gold
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Hycroft Mining
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

55.4% of Centerra Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.4% of Hycroft Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Centerra Gold shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Hycroft Mining shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Centerra Gold has a beta of 0.81, meaning that its stock price is 19% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hycroft Mining has a beta of 2.71, meaning that its stock price is 171% more volatile than the broader market.

Centerra Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Hycroft Mining. Hycroft Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Centerra Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Centerra Gold$1.38B2.14$583.99M$3.104.82
Hycroft MiningN/AN/A-$40.66M-$1.19N/A

Summary

Centerra Gold beats Hycroft Mining on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hycroft Mining compare to Seabridge Gold?

Hycroft Mining (NASDAQ:HYMC) and Seabridge Gold (NYSE:SA) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Seabridge Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hycroft Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hycroft MiningN/AN/A-$40.66M-$1.19N/A
Seabridge GoldN/AN/A-$38.06M-$0.48N/A

Hycroft Mining currently has a consensus target price of $28.00, indicating a potential upside of 53.28%. Seabridge Gold has a consensus target price of $65.00, indicating a potential upside of 171.16%. Given Seabridge Gold's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Seabridge Gold is more favorable than Hycroft Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hycroft Mining
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Seabridge Gold
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67

In the previous week, Hycroft Mining had 5 more articles in the media than Seabridge Gold. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Hycroft Mining and 2 mentions for Seabridge Gold. Hycroft Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Seabridge Gold's score of 0.59 indicating that Hycroft Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Hycroft Mining
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Seabridge Gold
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Hycroft Mining has a beta of 2.71, meaning that its share price is 171% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Seabridge Gold has a beta of 0.89, meaning that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

7.4% of Hycroft Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.8% of Seabridge Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Hycroft Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.8% of Seabridge Gold shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Seabridge Gold's return on equity of -6.38% beat Hycroft Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hycroft MiningN/A -65.73% -33.36%
Seabridge Gold N/A -6.38%-4.06%

Summary

Seabridge Gold beats Hycroft Mining on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Hycroft Mining News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for HYMC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding HYMC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

HYMC vs. The Competition

MetricHycroft MiningMINING IndustryMaterials SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$1.66B$8.84B$4.54B$12.67B
Dividend YieldN/A1.91%5.03%8.87%
P/E Ratio-15.2313.3220.6024.06
Price / SalesN/A142.616,341.04112.08
Price / CashN/A106.6626.5459.89
Price / Book7.113.508.576.23
Net Income-$40.66M$312.64M$157.11M$331.94M
7 Day Performance-14.56%-6.10%-2.15%-1.66%
1 Month Performance-28.56%-16.73%-6.50%-1.03%
1 Year Performance378.19%39.45%36.90%17.09%

Hycroft Mining Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
HYMC
Hycroft Mining
3.0883 of 5 stars
$18.73
+1.6%
$28.00
+49.5%
+382.5%$1.70BN/AN/A100
SBSW
Sibanye Gold
2.6434 of 5 stars
$8.60
-4.1%
$19.93
+131.9%
-5.8%$6.10B$7.25BN/A57,857
OR
OR Royalties
4.5401 of 5 stars
$30.23
-1.9%
$45.50
+50.5%
+1.5%$5.67B$277.37M22.5730
SKE
Skeena Resources
0.7565 of 5 stars
$27.16
-3.6%
N/A+53.5%$3.39BN/AN/A60
CGAU
Centerra Gold
4.882 of 5 stars
$16.22
-1.8%
$16.67
+2.7%
+110.7%$3.22B$1.38B5.251,500

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:HYMC) was last updated on 7/17/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners