Go Pro

China Natural Resources (CHNR) Competitors

China Natural Resources logo
$3.58 -0.02 (-0.42%)
Closing price 07/20/2026 03:57 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$3.57 -0.01 (-0.39%)
As of 05:45 AM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

CHNR vs. AUST, AUMN, ODVWZ, SIND, and AEM

Should you buy China Natural Resources stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares China Natural Resources with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with China Natural Resources include Austin Gold (AUST), Golden Minerals (AUMN), Osisko Development (ODVWZ), Sinda (SIND), and Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM). These companies are all part of the "precious metals" industry.

How does China Natural Resources compare to Austin Gold?

Austin Gold (NYSE:AUST) and China Natural Resources (NASDAQ:CHNR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership and dividends.

China Natural Resources' return on equity of 0.00% beat Austin Gold's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Austin GoldN/A -37.85% -36.54%
China Natural Resources N/A N/A N/A

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Austin GoldN/AN/A-$4M-$0.12N/A
China Natural ResourcesN/AN/A-$180KN/AN/A

In the previous week, Austin Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled China Natural Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Austin Gold Neutral
China Natural Resources Neutral

62.1% of Austin Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of China Natural Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 70.7% of Austin Gold shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.2% of China Natural Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Austin Gold has a beta of 0.92, indicating that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, China Natural Resources has a beta of 0.08, indicating that its stock price is 92% less volatile than the broader market.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Austin Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
China Natural Resources
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Summary

China Natural Resources beats Austin Gold on 4 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Natural Resources compare to Golden Minerals?

Golden Minerals (NYSE:AUMN) and China Natural Resources (NASDAQ:CHNR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, valuation, earnings and dividends.

13.4% of Golden Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of China Natural Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.8% of Golden Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.2% of China Natural Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Golden Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
China Natural Resources
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

China Natural Resources' return on equity of 0.00% beat Golden Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Golden MineralsN/A -1,051.75% -57.22%
China Natural Resources N/A N/A N/A

China Natural Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Golden Minerals.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Golden Minerals$300K10.06-$9.23M-$0.15N/A
China Natural ResourcesN/AN/A-$180KN/AN/A

In the previous week, Golden Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled China Natural Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Golden Minerals Neutral
China Natural Resources Neutral

Golden Minerals has a beta of -0.78, meaning that its stock price is 178% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, China Natural Resources has a beta of 0.08, meaning that its stock price is 92% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

China Natural Resources beats Golden Minerals on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Natural Resources compare to Osisko Development?

China Natural Resources (NASDAQ:CHNR) and Osisko Development (NASDAQ:ODVWZ) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

0.0% of China Natural Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.2% of China Natural Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
China Natural ResourcesN/A N/A N/A
Osisko Development N/A N/A N/A

Osisko Development has higher revenue and earnings than China Natural Resources.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China Natural ResourcesN/AN/A-$180KN/AN/A
Osisko Development$37.69MN/AN/AN/AN/A

In the previous week, China Natural Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Osisko Development'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
China Natural Resources Neutral
Osisko Development Neutral

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
China Natural Resources
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Osisko Development
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

China Natural Resources beats Osisko Development on 3 of the 4 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Natural Resources compare to Sinda?

Sinda (NYSE:SIND) and China Natural Resources (NASDAQ:CHNR) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings and valuation.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Sinda
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
China Natural Resources
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
SindaN/A N/A N/A
China Natural Resources N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Sinda's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled China Natural Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Sinda Neutral
China Natural Resources Neutral

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
SindaN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
China Natural ResourcesN/AN/A-$180KN/AN/A

0.0% of China Natural Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.2% of China Natural Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

China Natural Resources beats Sinda on 3 of the 3 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Natural Resources compare to Agnico Eagle Mines?

Agnico Eagle Mines (NYSE:AEM) and China Natural Resources (NASDAQ:CHNR) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, dividends and risk.

In the previous week, Agnico Eagle Mines had 36 more articles in the media than China Natural Resources. MarketBeat recorded 36 mentions for Agnico Eagle Mines and 0 mentions for China Natural Resources. Agnico Eagle Mines' average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat China Natural Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Agnico Eagle Mines is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Agnico Eagle Mines Positive
China Natural Resources Neutral

Agnico Eagle Mines has higher revenue and earnings than China Natural Resources.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Agnico Eagle Mines$13.54B5.11$4.46B$10.6412.81
China Natural ResourcesN/AN/A-$180KN/AN/A

Agnico Eagle Mines currently has a consensus price target of $233.62, indicating a potential upside of 71.46%. Given Agnico Eagle Mines' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Agnico Eagle Mines is more favorable than China Natural Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Agnico Eagle Mines
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71
China Natural Resources
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

68.3% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of China Natural Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.2% of China Natural Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Agnico Eagle Mines has a beta of 0.6, meaning that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, China Natural Resources has a beta of 0.08, meaning that its stock price is 92% less volatile than the broader market.

Agnico Eagle Mines has a net margin of 39.46% compared to China Natural Resources' net margin of 0.00%. Agnico Eagle Mines' return on equity of 21.09% beat China Natural Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Agnico Eagle Mines39.46% 21.09% 15.27%
China Natural Resources N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Agnico Eagle Mines beats China Natural Resources on 12 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get China Natural Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CHNR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CHNR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CHNR vs. The Competition

MetricChina Natural ResourcesMINING IndustryMaterials SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$4.52M$8.47B$4.46B$12.28B
Dividend YieldN/A1.97%5.04%9.39%
P/E RatioN/A13.1120.4923.94
Price / SalesN/A106.965,756.9890.33
Price / CashN/A34.6624.0747.25
Price / Book0.373.458.496.14
Net Income-$180K$312.64M$157.08M$331.74M
7 Day Performance-7.36%-6.70%-1.97%-1.82%
1 Month Performance-16.63%-17.53%-5.88%-1.45%
1 Year Performance-10.82%35.91%34.76%16.32%

China Natural Resources Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CHNR
China Natural Resources
0.6086 of 5 stars
$3.59
-0.4%
N/A-6.4%$4.52MN/AN/A80
AUST
Austin Gold
N/A$1.07
+3.9%
N/A-25.8%$14.10MN/AN/AN/A
AUMN
Golden Minerals
N/A$0.19
flat
N/A-20.4%$2.88M$300KN/A250
ODVWZ
Osisko Development
N/A$0.05
-36.9%
N/AN/A$0.00$37.69MN/A310
SIND
Sinda
N/A$12.50
-0.8%
N/AN/A$0.00N/AN/A84

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:CHNR) was last updated on 7/21/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners