Go Pro

Golden Minerals (AUMN) Competitors

Golden Minerals logo
$0.23 +0.00 (+1.67%)
As of 09/3/2026 11:41 AM Eastern

AUMN vs. GRMLW, OGG, ODVWZ, B, and BVN

Should you buy Golden Minerals stock or one of its competitors? Golden Minerals's main competitors and comparable companies include Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant (GRMLW), Osisko Development (OGG), Osisko Development (ODVWZ), Barrick Mining (B), and Buenaventura Mining (BVN). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "precious metals & minerals" industry.

How does Golden Minerals compare to Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant?

Golden Minerals (NYSE:AUMN) and Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant (NASDAQ:GRMLW) are both materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations and risk.

13.4% of Golden Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.8% of Golden Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant's return on equity of 0.00% beat Golden Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Golden MineralsN/A -1,051.75% -57.22%
Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Golden Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Golden Minerals and 0 mentions for Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant. Golden Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Golden Minerals Neutral
Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant Neutral

Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Golden Minerals.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Golden Minerals$300K11.65-$9.23M-$0.12N/A
Greenland Mines Ltd WarrantN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Summary

Golden Minerals beats Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Golden Minerals compare to Osisko Development?

Golden Minerals (NYSE:AUMN) and Osisko Development (NYSE:OGG) are both materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and earnings.

Golden Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Osisko Development. Osisko Development is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Golden Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Golden Minerals$300K11.65-$9.23M-$0.12N/A
Osisko Development$25.39M36.02-$120.96M-$0.12N/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Golden Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Osisko Development
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Golden Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than Osisko Development. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Golden Minerals and 0 mentions for Osisko Development. Golden Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Osisko Development'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Golden Minerals Neutral
Osisko Development Neutral

13.4% of Golden Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.2% of Osisko Development shares are held by institutional investors. 4.8% of Golden Minerals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Osisko Development shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Osisko Development has a net margin of 148.74% compared to Golden Minerals' net margin of 0.00%. Osisko Development's return on equity of 11.53% beat Golden Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Golden MineralsN/A -1,051.75% -57.22%
Osisko Development 148.74%11.53%6.55%

Summary

Osisko Development beats Golden Minerals on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Golden Minerals compare to Osisko Development?

Golden Minerals (NYSE:AUMN) and Osisko Development (NASDAQ:ODVWZ) are both materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment and earnings.

In the previous week, Golden Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than Osisko Development. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Golden Minerals and 0 mentions for Osisko Development. Golden Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Osisko Development'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Golden Minerals Neutral
Osisko Development Neutral

13.4% of Golden Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.8% of Golden Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Osisko Development has higher revenue and earnings than Golden Minerals.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Golden Minerals$300K11.65-$9.23M-$0.12N/A
Osisko Development$37.69MN/AN/AN/AN/A

Osisko Development's return on equity of 0.00% beat Golden Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Golden MineralsN/A -1,051.75% -57.22%
Osisko Development N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Golden Minerals and Osisko Development tied by winning 3 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Golden Minerals compare to Barrick Mining?

Golden Minerals (NYSE:AUMN) and Barrick Mining (NYSE:B) are both materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and risk.

Barrick Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Golden Minerals. Golden Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Barrick Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Golden Minerals$300K11.65-$9.23M-$0.12N/A
Barrick Mining$16.96B4.44$4.99B$3.8811.79

In the previous week, Barrick Mining had 15 more articles in the media than Golden Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Barrick Mining and 1 mentions for Golden Minerals. Barrick Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat Golden Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that Barrick Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Golden Minerals
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Barrick Mining
8 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

13.4% of Golden Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.8% of Barrick Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.8% of Golden Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.2% of Barrick Mining shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Golden Minerals has a beta of -0.75, suggesting that its share price is 175% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Barrick Mining has a beta of 0.51, suggesting that its share price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

Barrick Mining has a consensus target price of $52.36, indicating a potential upside of 14.42%. Given Barrick Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Barrick Mining is more favorable than Golden Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Golden Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Barrick Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
17 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83

Barrick Mining has a net margin of 31.60% compared to Golden Minerals' net margin of 0.00%. Barrick Mining's return on equity of 16.02% beat Golden Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Golden MineralsN/A -1,051.75% -57.22%
Barrick Mining 31.60%16.02%11.22%

Summary

Barrick Mining beats Golden Minerals on 16 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Golden Minerals compare to Buenaventura Mining?

Buenaventura Mining (NYSE:BVN) and Golden Minerals (NYSE:AUMN) are both materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

13.4% of Golden Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.3% of Buenaventura Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.8% of Golden Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Buenaventura Mining has a beta of 0.46, indicating that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Golden Minerals has a beta of -0.75, indicating that its stock price is 175% less volatile than the broader market.

Buenaventura Mining has a net margin of 50.88% compared to Golden Minerals' net margin of 0.00%. Buenaventura Mining's return on equity of 26.53% beat Golden Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Buenaventura Mining50.88% 26.53% 18.88%
Golden Minerals N/A -1,051.75%-57.22%

Buenaventura Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Golden Minerals. Golden Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Buenaventura Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Buenaventura Mining$1.73B5.10$782.15M$4.427.87
Golden Minerals$300K11.65-$9.23M-$0.12N/A

Buenaventura Mining currently has a consensus price target of $37.25, suggesting a potential upside of 7.10%. Given Buenaventura Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Buenaventura Mining is more favorable than Golden Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Buenaventura Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Golden Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Buenaventura Mining and Buenaventura Mining both had 1 articles in the media. Buenaventura Mining's average media sentiment score of 1.70 beat Golden Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that Buenaventura Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Buenaventura Mining
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Golden Minerals
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Buenaventura Mining beats Golden Minerals on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Golden Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for AUMN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding AUMN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

AUMN vs. The Competition

MetricGolden MineralsMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$3.50M$4.05B$5.07B$23.50B
Dividend YieldN/A5.17%4.67%3.73%
P/E Ratio-0.4425.5826.1829.39
Price / Sales11.658,871.175,280.5020.94
Price / CashN/A29.6827.0932.15
Price / Book0.6412.7410.637.63
Net Income-$9.23M$125.14M$156.32M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-3.71%-0.24%-0.28%-0.16%
1 Month Performance24.50%21.37%16.21%-0.46%
1 Year Performance-25.58%57.36%45.06%13.09%

Golden Minerals Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
AUMN
Golden Minerals
N/A$0.23
+1.7%
N/A-19.3%$3.50M$300KN/A250
GRMLW
Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant
N/A$0.16
-11.1%
N/A+13.1%$0.00N/AN/AN/A
OGG
Osisko Development
0.1518 of 5 stars
$3.08
-3.4%
N/A+5.1%$0.00$25.39MN/A310
ODVWZ
Osisko Development
N/A$0.05
-9.8%
N/A-94.5%$0.00$37.69MN/A310
B
Barrick Mining
4.5442 of 5 stars
$47.00
-3.8%
$52.57
+11.9%
+68.7%$80.43B$16.96B12.1127,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:AUMN) was last updated on 9/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners