Which has higher valuation & earnings, AUMN or GRMLW?

Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Golden Minerals. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Golden Minerals $300K 10.86 -$9.23M -$0.12 N/A Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Is AUMN or GRMLW more profitable?

Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant's return on equity of 0.00% beat Golden Minerals' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Golden Minerals N/A -1,051.75% -57.22% Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant N/A N/A N/A

Do analysts prefer OGG or AUMN?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Osisko Development 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 2 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Golden Minerals 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, ODVWZ or AUMN?

Osisko Development has higher revenue and earnings than Golden Minerals. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Osisko Development $37.69M N/A N/A N/A N/A Golden Minerals $300K 10.86 -$9.23M -$0.12 N/A

Is ODVWZ or AUMN more profitable?

Osisko Development's return on equity of 0.00% beat Golden Minerals' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Osisko Development N/A N/A N/A Golden Minerals N/A -1,051.75% -57.22%

Do analysts rate AUMN or B?

Barrick Mining has a consensus price target of $53.39, indicating a potential upside of 31.68%. Given Barrick Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Barrick Mining is more favorable than Golden Minerals. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Golden Minerals 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Barrick Mining 0 Sell rating(s) 4 Hold rating(s) 15 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.85

Do analysts prefer AUMN or SBSW?

Sibanye Gold has a consensus price target of $16.33, suggesting a potential upside of 64.65%. Given Sibanye Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Sibanye Gold is more favorable than Golden Minerals. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Golden Minerals 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Sibanye Gold 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33

Which has higher valuation and earnings, AUMN or SBSW?

Golden Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Sibanye Gold. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Golden Minerals $300K 10.86 -$9.23M -$0.12 N/A Sibanye Gold $7.25B 0.97 -$289.58M N/A N/A

Is AUMN or SBSW more profitable?

Sibanye Gold's return on equity of 0.00% beat Golden Minerals' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Golden Minerals N/A -1,051.75% -57.22% Sibanye Gold N/A N/A N/A

Golden Minerals (AUMN) Competitors

$0.22 +0.00 (+0.74%)

As of 10:12 AM Eastern

Compare

AUMN vs. GRMLW, OGG, ODVWZ, B, and SBSW

Should you buy Golden Minerals stock or one of its competitors? Golden Minerals's main competitors and comparable companies include Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant (GRMLW), Osisko Development (OGG), Osisko Development (ODVWZ), Barrick Mining (B), and Sibanye Gold (SBSW). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "precious metals & minerals" industry.

How does Golden Minerals compare to Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant?

Golden Minerals (NYSE:AUMN) and Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant (NASDAQ:GRMLW) are both materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership and risk.

Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Golden Minerals.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Golden Minerals	$300K	10.86	-$9.23M	-$0.12	N/A
Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

In the previous week, Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant had 2 more articles in the media than Golden Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant and 0 mentions for Golden Minerals. Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant's average media sentiment score of 0.39 beat Golden Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Golden Minerals	Neutral
Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant	Neutral

Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant's return on equity of 0.00% beat Golden Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Golden Minerals	N/A	-1,051.75%	-57.22%
Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant	N/A	N/A	N/A

13.4% of Golden Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.8% of Golden Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant beats Golden Minerals on 4 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Golden Minerals compare to Osisko Development?

Osisko Development (NYSE:OGG) and Golden Minerals (NYSE:AUMN) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings and risk.

Golden Minerals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Osisko Development. Osisko Development is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Golden Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Osisko Development	$25.39M	32.52	-$120.96M	-$0.12	N/A
Golden Minerals	$300K	10.86	-$9.23M	-$0.12	N/A

In the previous week, Osisko Development had 1 more articles in the media than Golden Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Osisko Development and 0 mentions for Golden Minerals. Osisko Development's average media sentiment score of 1.80 beat Golden Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that Osisko Development is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Osisko Development	Very Positive
Golden Minerals	Neutral

Osisko Development has a net margin of 148.74% compared to Golden Minerals' net margin of 0.00%. Osisko Development's return on equity of 11.53% beat Golden Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Osisko Development	148.74%	11.53%	6.55%
Golden Minerals	N/A	-1,051.75%	-57.22%

15.2% of Osisko Development shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.4% of Golden Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Osisko Development shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.8% of Golden Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Osisko Development	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Golden Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Summary

Osisko Development beats Golden Minerals on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Golden Minerals compare to Osisko Development?

Osisko Development (NASDAQ:ODVWZ) and Golden Minerals (NYSE:AUMN) are both materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, earnings and risk.

In the previous week, Osisko Development's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Golden Minerals'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Osisko Development	Neutral
Golden Minerals	Neutral

Osisko Development has higher revenue and earnings than Golden Minerals.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Osisko Development	$37.69M	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Golden Minerals	$300K	10.86	-$9.23M	-$0.12	N/A

13.4% of Golden Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 4.8% of Golden Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Osisko Development's return on equity of 0.00% beat Golden Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Osisko Development	N/A	N/A	N/A
Golden Minerals	N/A	-1,051.75%	-57.22%

Summary

Osisko Development beats Golden Minerals on 3 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Golden Minerals compare to Barrick Mining?

Golden Minerals (NYSE:AUMN) and Barrick Mining (NYSE:B) are both materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Barrick Mining has a net margin of 31.60% compared to Golden Minerals' net margin of 0.00%. Barrick Mining's return on equity of 16.02% beat Golden Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Golden Minerals	N/A	-1,051.75%	-57.22%
Barrick Mining	31.60%	16.02%	11.22%

13.4% of Golden Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.8% of Barrick Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 4.8% of Golden Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Barrick Mining shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Golden Minerals has a beta of -0.84, indicating that its stock price is 184% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Barrick Mining has a beta of 0.48, indicating that its stock price is 52% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Barrick Mining had 9 more articles in the media than Golden Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Barrick Mining and 0 mentions for Golden Minerals. Barrick Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat Golden Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that Barrick Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Golden Minerals	Neutral
Barrick Mining	Neutral

Barrick Mining has a consensus price target of $53.39, indicating a potential upside of 31.68%. Given Barrick Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Barrick Mining is more favorable than Golden Minerals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Golden Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Barrick Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	15 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.85

Barrick Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Golden Minerals. Golden Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Barrick Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Golden Minerals	$300K	10.86	-$9.23M	-$0.12	N/A
Barrick Mining	$16.96B	3.91	$4.99B	$3.88	10.45

Summary

Barrick Mining beats Golden Minerals on 15 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Golden Minerals compare to Sibanye Gold?

Golden Minerals (NYSE:AUMN) and Sibanye Gold (NYSE:SBSW) are both materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and risk.

Golden Minerals has a beta of -0.84, suggesting that its stock price is 184% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sibanye Gold has a beta of 0.67, suggesting that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

13.4% of Golden Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.9% of Sibanye Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.8% of Golden Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Sibanye Gold shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Sibanye Gold had 3 more articles in the media than Golden Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Sibanye Gold and 0 mentions for Golden Minerals. Sibanye Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.15 beat Golden Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that Sibanye Gold is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Golden Minerals	Neutral
Sibanye Gold	Neutral

Golden Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Sibanye Gold.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Golden Minerals	$300K	10.86	-$9.23M	-$0.12	N/A
Sibanye Gold	$7.25B	0.97	-$289.58M	N/A	N/A

Sibanye Gold has a consensus price target of $16.33, suggesting a potential upside of 64.65%. Given Sibanye Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Sibanye Gold is more favorable than Golden Minerals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Golden Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Sibanye Gold	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

Sibanye Gold's return on equity of 0.00% beat Golden Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Golden Minerals	N/A	-1,051.75%	-57.22%
Sibanye Gold	N/A	N/A	N/A

Summary

Sibanye Gold beats Golden Minerals on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Golden Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding AUMN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

AUMN vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Golden Minerals	Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$3.28M	$3.67B	$4.65B	$22.90B
Dividend Yield	N/A	5.25%	4.78%	3.72%
P/E Ratio	-0.42	23.64	23.53	28.17
Price / Sales	10.94	27,246.72	16,227.18	20.91
Price / Cash	N/A	27.01	24.88	37.05
Price / Book	0.60	11.64	9.68	4.67
Net Income	-$9.23M	$127.18M	$159.17M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-4.41%	-2.49%	-2.12%	-0.67%
1 Month Performance	-2.08%	76.18%	55.62%	-4.30%
1 Year Performance	-59.89%	10.79%	10.31%	5.52%

Golden Minerals Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
AUMN Golden Minerals	N/A	$0.22 +0.7%	N/A	-59.0%	$3.28M	$300K	N/A	250
GRMLW Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant	N/A	$0.47 -5.0%	N/A	+202.8%	$0.00	N/A	N/A	N/A	Short Interest Increase Gap Up
OGG Osisko Development	0.663 of 5 stars	$2.76 -1.4%	N/A	-24.1%	$0.00	$25.39M	N/A	310	Gap Up High Trading Volume
ODVWZ Osisko Development	N/A	$0.05 -0.2%	N/A	N/A	$0.00	$37.69M	N/A	310
B Barrick Mining	4.8659 of 5 stars	$39.19 -3.8%	$53.39 +36.3%	+21.4%	$66.57B	$16.96B	10.10	27,000	Gap Down

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:AUMN) was last updated on 10/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Golden Minerals (AUMN) Competitors

AUMN vs. GRMLW, OGG, ODVWZ, B, and SBSW

How does Golden Minerals compare to Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant?

Summary

How does Golden Minerals compare to Osisko Development?

Summary

How does Golden Minerals compare to Osisko Development?

Summary

How does Golden Minerals compare to Barrick Mining?

Summary

How does Golden Minerals compare to Sibanye Gold?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

AUMN vs. The Competition

Golden Minerals Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Golden Minerals (AUMN) Competitors

AUMN vs. GRMLW, OGG, ODVWZ, B, and SBSW

How does Golden Minerals compare to Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, AUMN or GRMLW?

Does the media refer more to AUMN or GRMLW?

Is AUMN or GRMLW more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in AUMN or GRMLW?

Summary

How does Golden Minerals compare to Osisko Development?

Which has better valuation & earnings, OGG or AUMN?

Does the media refer more to OGG or AUMN?

Is OGG or AUMN more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of OGG or AUMN?

Do analysts prefer OGG or AUMN?

Summary

How does Golden Minerals compare to Osisko Development?

Does the media refer more to ODVWZ or AUMN?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, ODVWZ or AUMN?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in ODVWZ or AUMN?

Is ODVWZ or AUMN more profitable?

Summary

How does Golden Minerals compare to Barrick Mining?

Is AUMN or B more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in AUMN or B?

Which has more volatility and risk, AUMN or B?

Does the media refer more to AUMN or B?

Do analysts rate AUMN or B?

Which has better earnings and valuation, AUMN or B?

Summary

How does Golden Minerals compare to Sibanye Gold?

Which has more volatility and risk, AUMN or SBSW?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of AUMN or SBSW?

Does the media favor AUMN or SBSW?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, AUMN or SBSW?

Do analysts prefer AUMN or SBSW?

Is AUMN or SBSW more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

AUMN vs. The Competition

Golden Minerals Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools