AUMN vs. CHNR, AUST, FMST, ELBM, GURE, RKDA, MGIH, ZKIN, WWR, and FSI
Should you be buying Golden Minerals stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Golden Minerals include China Natural Resources (CHNR), Austin Gold (AUST), Foremost Lithium Resource & Technology (FMST), Electra Battery Materials (ELBM), Gulf Resources (GURE), Arcadia Biosciences (RKDA), Millennium Group International (MGIH), ZK International Group (ZKIN), Westwater Resources (WWR), and Flexible Solutions International (FSI). These companies are all part of the "basic materials" sector.
Golden Minerals (NYSE:AUMN) and China Natural Resources (NASDAQ:CHNR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, risk and community ranking.
13.4% of Golden Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of China Natural Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.2% of Golden Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 23.2% of China Natural Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.
China Natural Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Golden Minerals.
In the previous week, Golden Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than China Natural Resources. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Golden Minerals and 1 mentions for China Natural Resources. China Natural Resources' average media sentiment score of -0.10 beat Golden Minerals' score of -0.46 indicating that China Natural Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
China Natural Resources received 85 more outperform votes than Golden Minerals when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 34.82% of users gave China Natural Resources an outperform vote while only 4.55% of users gave Golden Minerals an outperform vote.
Golden Minerals has a beta of 0.42, indicating that its share price is 58% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, China Natural Resources has a beta of 0.73, indicating that its share price is 27% less volatile than the S&P 500.
Golden Minerals currently has a consensus target price of $7.23, suggesting a potential upside of 1,201.06%. Given Golden Minerals' higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Golden Minerals is more favorable than China Natural Resources.
China Natural Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Golden Minerals' net margin of -77.16%. China Natural Resources' return on equity of 0.00% beat Golden Minerals' return on equity.
Summary
China Natural Resources beats Golden Minerals on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Golden Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for AUMN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding AUMN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Golden Minerals Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
