Go Pro
→ Why I went to Mount Rushmore (From Stansberry Research) (Ad)tc pixel Free AUMN Stock Alerts

Golden Minerals (AUMN) Competitors

Golden Minerals logo
$0.22 +0.01 (+2.99%)
As of 09/23/2026 03:21 PM Eastern
Compare

AUMN vs. GRML, GRMLW, OGG, ODVWZ, and B

Should you buy Golden Minerals stock or one of its competitors? Golden Minerals's main competitors and comparable companies include Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock (GRML), Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant (GRMLW), Osisko Development (OGG), Osisko Development (ODVWZ), and Barrick Mining (B). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "precious metals & minerals" industry.

How does Golden Minerals compare to Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock?

Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock (NASDAQ:GRML) and Golden Minerals (NYSE:AUMN) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability and risk.

Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock's return on equity of -67.98% beat Golden Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Greenland Mines Ltd. Common StockN/A -67.98% -60.61%
Golden Minerals N/A -1,051.75%-57.22%

20.1% of Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.4% of Golden Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 11.3% of Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.8% of Golden Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock had 13 more articles in the media than Golden Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock and 0 mentions for Golden Minerals. Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock's average media sentiment score of 0.08 beat Golden Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock Neutral
Golden Minerals Neutral

Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock has a beta of 6.91, indicating that its stock price is 591% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Golden Minerals has a beta of -0.75, indicating that its stock price is 175% less volatile than the broader market.

Golden Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock. Golden Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Greenland Mines Ltd. Common StockN/AN/A-$10.55M-$11.50N/A
Golden Minerals$300K11.31-$9.23M-$0.12N/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Golden Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock beats Golden Minerals on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Golden Minerals compare to Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant?

Golden Minerals (NYSE:AUMN) and Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant (NASDAQ:GRMLW) are both materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends and analyst recommendations.

13.4% of Golden Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.8% of Golden Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Golden Minerals.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Golden Minerals$300K11.31-$9.23M-$0.12N/A
Greenland Mines Ltd WarrantN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant's return on equity of 0.00% beat Golden Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Golden MineralsN/A -1,051.75% -57.22%
Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant had 1 more articles in the media than Golden Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant and 0 mentions for Golden Minerals. Golden Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Golden Minerals Neutral
Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant Neutral

Summary

Golden Minerals and Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant tied by winning 3 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Golden Minerals compare to Osisko Development?

Golden Minerals (NYSE:AUMN) and Osisko Development (NYSE:OGG) are both materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Osisko Development has a net margin of 148.74% compared to Golden Minerals' net margin of 0.00%. Osisko Development's return on equity of 11.53% beat Golden Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Golden MineralsN/A -1,051.75% -57.22%
Osisko Development 148.74%11.53%6.55%

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Golden Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Osisko Development
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25

In the previous week, Osisko Development had 4 more articles in the media than Golden Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Osisko Development and 0 mentions for Golden Minerals. Osisko Development's average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat Golden Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that Osisko Development is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Golden Minerals Neutral
Osisko Development Positive

Golden Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Osisko Development. Osisko Development is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Golden Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Golden Minerals$300K11.31-$9.23M-$0.12N/A
Osisko Development$25.39M32.52-$120.96M-$0.12N/A

13.4% of Golden Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.2% of Osisko Development shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.8% of Golden Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Osisko Development shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Osisko Development beats Golden Minerals on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Golden Minerals compare to Osisko Development?

Osisko Development (NASDAQ:ODVWZ) and Golden Minerals (NYSE:AUMN) are both materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

Osisko Development has higher revenue and earnings than Golden Minerals.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Osisko Development$37.69MN/AN/AN/AN/A
Golden Minerals$300K11.31-$9.23M-$0.12N/A

Osisko Development's return on equity of 0.00% beat Golden Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Osisko DevelopmentN/A N/A N/A
Golden Minerals N/A -1,051.75%-57.22%

In the previous week, Osisko Development's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Golden Minerals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Osisko Development Neutral
Golden Minerals Neutral

13.4% of Golden Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 4.8% of Golden Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Osisko Development beats Golden Minerals on 3 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Golden Minerals compare to Barrick Mining?

Golden Minerals (NYSE:AUMN) and Barrick Mining (NYSE:B) are both materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and dividends.

Barrick Mining has a net margin of 31.60% compared to Golden Minerals' net margin of 0.00%. Barrick Mining's return on equity of 16.02% beat Golden Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Golden MineralsN/A -1,051.75% -57.22%
Barrick Mining 31.60%16.02%11.22%

Barrick Mining has a consensus price target of $52.90, suggesting a potential upside of 24.65%. Given Barrick Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Barrick Mining is more favorable than Golden Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Golden Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Barrick Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
16 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86

In the previous week, Barrick Mining had 13 more articles in the media than Golden Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Barrick Mining and 0 mentions for Golden Minerals. Barrick Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.43 beat Golden Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that Barrick Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Golden Minerals Neutral
Barrick Mining Neutral

Golden Minerals has a beta of -0.75, suggesting that its stock price is 175% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Barrick Mining has a beta of 0.51, suggesting that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

13.4% of Golden Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.8% of Barrick Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.8% of Golden Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.2% of Barrick Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Barrick Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Golden Minerals. Golden Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Barrick Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Golden Minerals$300K11.31-$9.23M-$0.12N/A
Barrick Mining$16.96B4.12$4.99B$3.8810.94

Summary

Barrick Mining beats Golden Minerals on 16 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Golden Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for AUMN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding AUMN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

AUMN vs. The Competition

Export
MetricGolden MineralsMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$3.30M$3.96B$4.94B$23.08B
Dividend YieldN/A5.21%4.71%3.61%
P/E Ratio-0.4325.7626.1028.10
Price / Sales11.3129,668.6517,625.3622.89
Price / CashN/A29.4726.8938.68
Price / Book0.6212.1910.134.66
Net Income-$9.23M$127.53M$158.14M$1.07B
7 Day Performance3.23%0.85%0.51%-1.27%
1 Month Performance4.92%-2.23%-2.16%-4.71%
1 Year Performance-45.51%30.38%25.48%7.48%

Golden Minerals Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
AUMN
Golden Minerals
N/A$0.22
+3.0%		N/A-45.8%$3.30M$300KN/A250
GRML
Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock
1.4476 of 5 stars		$2.99
-3.9%		N/A-56.9%$9.88MN/AN/A5
GRMLW
Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant
N/A$0.16
-10.0%		N/A+198.6%$0.00N/AN/AN/A
OGG
Osisko Development
0.9527 of 5 stars		$2.66
-4.0%		N/A-16.5%$0.00$25.39MN/A310
ODVWZ
Osisko Development
N/A$0.05
flat		N/A-84.6%$0.00$37.69MN/A310

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:AUMN) was last updated on 9/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
How to get a stake in Anthropic — before the IPO
Anthropic, the maker of Claude AI, has reportedly filed for an IPO that could arrive as early as October. Its ...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Why I believe the AI market will split in Q4
Matt McCall, who recommended Nvidia near $6 a share, says the AI market is splitting in two - just like the do...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
If you keep cash in a U.S. bank account… read this NOW
Since 2020, U.S. banks have been required to keep zero percent of deposits on hand, lending out nearly every d...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Shocking new footage just released
Gerardo Del Real is calling it the Third Convergence Event, a new catalyst hitting the uranium market that he ...
Digest Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Major Buy Alert Issued for September 30th
Keith Kaplan has invested $17 million into his own AI research tools, building a platform now used by 180,000 ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's New Dollar
Porter Stansberry says President Trump has signed an executive order initiating what he calls a full U.S. doll...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
On October 7th, your “safest” assets are at risk
Jeff Brown called Nvidia's rise of over 27,000 percent and warned in early 2024 that inflation would outlast W...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
While SpaceX Gets the Spotlight, FJET Is Building What Comes Next!
Starfighters Space (NYSE: FJET) operates the world's only commercial fleet of flight-ready Mach 2+ F-104 Starf...
Trading Wire | Sponsoredtc pixel