Free Trial

Golden Minerals (AUMN) Competitors

Golden Minerals logo
$0.18 +0.00 (+1.98%)
As of 03:36 PM Eastern

AUMN vs. CHNR, TMCR, ODVWZ, AEM, and B

Should you be buying Golden Minerals stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Golden Minerals include China Natural Resources (CHNR), Metals Royalty Co Inc. The (TMCR), Osisko Development (ODVWZ), Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM), and Barrick Mining (B). These companies are all part of the "precious metals" industry.

How does Golden Minerals compare to China Natural Resources?

Golden Minerals (NYSE:AUMN) and China Natural Resources (NASDAQ:CHNR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Golden Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
China Natural Resources
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

China Natural Resources' return on equity of 0.00% beat Golden Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Golden MineralsN/A -1,051.75% -57.22%
China Natural Resources N/A N/A N/A

13.4% of Golden Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of China Natural Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Golden Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 23.2% of China Natural Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

China Natural Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Golden Minerals.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Golden Minerals$300K9.03-$9.23M-$0.16N/A
China Natural ResourcesN/AN/A-$430KN/AN/A

In the previous week, China Natural Resources' average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat Golden Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that China Natural Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Golden Minerals Neutral
China Natural Resources Very Positive

Golden Minerals has a beta of -0.8, indicating that its share price is 180% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, China Natural Resources has a beta of 0.08, indicating that its share price is 92% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

China Natural Resources beats Golden Minerals on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Golden Minerals compare to Metals Royalty Co Inc. The?

Golden Minerals (NYSE:AUMN) and Metals Royalty Co Inc. The (NASDAQ:TMCR) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, profitability and valuation.

Metals Royalty Co Inc. The's return on equity of 0.00% beat Golden Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Golden MineralsN/A -1,051.75% -57.22%
Metals Royalty Co Inc. The N/A N/A N/A

13.4% of Golden Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Golden Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Golden Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Metals Royalty Co Inc. The'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Golden Minerals Neutral
Metals Royalty Co Inc. The Neutral

Metals Royalty Co Inc. The has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Golden Minerals.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Golden Minerals$300K9.03-$9.23M-$0.16N/A
Metals Royalty Co Inc. TheN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Summary

Golden Minerals beats Metals Royalty Co Inc. The on 3 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Golden Minerals compare to Osisko Development?

Golden Minerals (NYSE:AUMN) and Osisko Development (NASDAQ:ODVWZ) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends and profitability.

Osisko Development's return on equity of 0.00% beat Golden Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Golden MineralsN/A -1,051.75% -57.22%
Osisko Development N/A N/A N/A

13.4% of Golden Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Golden Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Golden Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Osisko Development'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Golden Minerals Neutral
Osisko Development Neutral

Osisko Development has higher revenue and earnings than Golden Minerals.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Golden Minerals$300K9.03-$9.23M-$0.16N/A
Osisko Development$35.48MN/AN/AN/AN/A

Summary

Osisko Development beats Golden Minerals on 3 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Golden Minerals compare to Agnico Eagle Mines?

Agnico Eagle Mines (NYSE:AEM) and Golden Minerals (NYSE:AUMN) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Agnico Eagle Mines has a net margin of 39.46% compared to Golden Minerals' net margin of 0.00%. Agnico Eagle Mines' return on equity of 21.69% beat Golden Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Agnico Eagle Mines39.46% 21.69% 15.53%
Golden Minerals N/A -1,051.75%-57.22%

Agnico Eagle Mines has higher revenue and earnings than Golden Minerals. Golden Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Agnico Eagle Mines, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Agnico Eagle Mines$11.91B7.49$4.46B$10.6416.74
Golden Minerals$300K9.03-$9.23M-$0.16N/A

Agnico Eagle Mines currently has a consensus price target of $238.18, suggesting a potential upside of 33.73%. Given Agnico Eagle Mines' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Agnico Eagle Mines is more favorable than Golden Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Agnico Eagle Mines
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.69
Golden Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Agnico Eagle Mines had 53 more articles in the media than Golden Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 53 mentions for Agnico Eagle Mines and 0 mentions for Golden Minerals. Agnico Eagle Mines' average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Golden Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that Agnico Eagle Mines is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Agnico Eagle Mines Positive
Golden Minerals Neutral

Agnico Eagle Mines has a beta of 0.58, meaning that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Golden Minerals has a beta of -0.8, meaning that its stock price is 180% less volatile than the S&P 500.

68.3% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.4% of Golden Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Golden Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Agnico Eagle Mines beats Golden Minerals on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Golden Minerals compare to Barrick Mining?

Barrick Mining (NYSE:B) and Golden Minerals (NYSE:AUMN) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Barrick Mining has a net margin of 29.45% compared to Golden Minerals' net margin of 0.00%. Barrick Mining's return on equity of 12.10% beat Golden Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Barrick Mining29.45% 12.10% 8.47%
Golden Minerals N/A -1,051.75%-57.22%

Barrick Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Golden Minerals. Golden Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Barrick Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Barrick Mining$16.96B3.83$4.99B$2.9313.22
Golden Minerals$300K9.03-$9.23M-$0.16N/A

Barrick Mining currently has a consensus price target of $54.17, suggesting a potential upside of 39.88%. Given Barrick Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Barrick Mining is more favorable than Golden Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Barrick Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
16 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86
Golden Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Barrick Mining had 28 more articles in the media than Golden Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 28 mentions for Barrick Mining and 0 mentions for Golden Minerals. Barrick Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.68 beat Golden Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that Barrick Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Barrick Mining Positive
Golden Minerals Neutral

Barrick Mining has a beta of 0.41, meaning that its stock price is 59% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Golden Minerals has a beta of -0.8, meaning that its stock price is 180% less volatile than the S&P 500.

90.8% of Barrick Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.4% of Golden Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Barrick Mining shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Golden Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Barrick Mining beats Golden Minerals on 15 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Golden Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for AUMN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding AUMN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

AUMN vs. The Competition

MetricGolden MineralsGold & silver ores IndustryMaterials SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$2.66M$799.15M$4.72B$22.94B
Dividend YieldN/A1.17%4.98%4.03%
P/E Ratio-0.354.9820.9728.60
Price / Sales9.0312.377,339.1423.58
Price / CashN/A17.1524.3519.03
Price / Book0.508.557.704.68
Net Income-$9.23M$14.80M$159.29M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-11.94%-1.98%0.01%0.89%
1 Month Performance-14.33%-5.43%2.58%6.56%
1 Year Performance10.98%77.15%76.05%31.66%

Golden Minerals Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
AUMN
Golden Minerals
N/A$0.18
+2.0%
N/AN/A$2.66M$300KN/A250
CHNR
China Natural Resources
1.008 of 5 stars
$4.11
+0.7%
N/AN/A$5.06MN/AN/A80
TMCR
Metals Royalty Co Inc. The
N/A$14.31
+5.5%
N/AN/A$0.00N/AN/A10
ODVWZ
Osisko Development
N/A$0.18
+2.3%
N/AN/A$0.00$35.48MN/A310
AEM
Agnico Eagle Mines
4.4917 of 5 stars
$183.27
-3.1%
$239.36
+30.6%
N/A$91.74B$11.91B20.6418,216

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:AUMN) was last updated on 5/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners