Golden Minerals (AUMN) Competitors

$0.17 0.00 (0.00%)

As of 05/22/2026 02:19 PM Eastern

AUMN vs. CHNR, TMCR, ODVWZ, AEM, and B

Should you buy Golden Minerals stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Golden Minerals with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Golden Minerals include China Natural Resources (CHNR), Metals Royalty Co Inc. The (TMCR), Osisko Development (ODVWZ), Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM), and Barrick Mining (B). These companies are all part of the "precious metals" industry.

How does Golden Minerals compare to China Natural Resources?

Golden Minerals (NYSE:AUMN) and China Natural Resources (NASDAQ:CHNR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk and media sentiment.

Golden Minerals has a beta of -0.8, suggesting that its share price is 180% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, China Natural Resources has a beta of 0.08, suggesting that its share price is 92% less volatile than the broader market.

China Natural Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Golden Minerals.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Golden Minerals	$300K	8.53	-$9.23M	-$0.15	N/A
China Natural Resources	N/A	N/A	-$180K	N/A	N/A

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Golden Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
China Natural Resources	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

13.4% of Golden Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of China Natural Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Golden Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 23.2% of China Natural Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

China Natural Resources' return on equity of 0.00% beat Golden Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Golden Minerals	N/A	-1,051.75%	-57.22%
China Natural Resources	N/A	N/A	N/A

In the previous week, Golden Minerals and Golden Minerals both had 1 articles in the media. China Natural Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Golden Minerals' score of 0.40 indicating that China Natural Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Golden Minerals	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
China Natural Resources	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

China Natural Resources beats Golden Minerals on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Golden Minerals compare to Metals Royalty Co Inc. The?

Metals Royalty Co Inc. The (NASDAQ:TMCR) and Golden Minerals (NYSE:AUMN) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership and earnings.

In the previous week, Golden Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than Metals Royalty Co Inc. The. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Golden Minerals and 0 mentions for Metals Royalty Co Inc. The. Golden Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat Metals Royalty Co Inc. The's score of 0.00 indicating that Golden Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Metals Royalty Co Inc. The	Neutral
Golden Minerals	Neutral

Metals Royalty Co Inc. The's return on equity of 0.00% beat Golden Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Metals Royalty Co Inc. The	N/A	N/A	N/A
Golden Minerals	N/A	-1,051.75%	-57.22%

13.4% of Golden Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Golden Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Metals Royalty Co Inc. The has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Golden Minerals.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Metals Royalty Co Inc. The	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Golden Minerals	$300K	8.53	-$9.23M	-$0.15	N/A

Summary

Golden Minerals beats Metals Royalty Co Inc. The on 5 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Golden Minerals compare to Osisko Development?

Osisko Development (NASDAQ:ODVWZ) and Golden Minerals (NYSE:AUMN) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership and risk.

Osisko Development has higher revenue and earnings than Golden Minerals.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Osisko Development	$37.69M	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Golden Minerals	$300K	8.53	-$9.23M	-$0.15	N/A

Osisko Development's return on equity of 0.00% beat Golden Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Osisko Development	N/A	N/A	N/A
Golden Minerals	N/A	-1,051.75%	-57.22%

13.4% of Golden Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Golden Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Golden Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than Osisko Development. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Golden Minerals and 0 mentions for Osisko Development. Golden Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat Osisko Development's score of 0.00 indicating that Golden Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Osisko Development	Neutral
Golden Minerals	Neutral

Summary

Golden Minerals beats Osisko Development on 4 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Golden Minerals compare to Agnico Eagle Mines?

Agnico Eagle Mines (NYSE:AEM) and Golden Minerals (NYSE:AUMN) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, risk, media sentiment and valuation.

Agnico Eagle Mines has higher revenue and earnings than Golden Minerals. Golden Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Agnico Eagle Mines, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Agnico Eagle Mines	$11.91B	7.39	$4.46B	$10.64	16.52
Golden Minerals	$300K	8.53	-$9.23M	-$0.15	N/A

68.3% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.4% of Golden Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Golden Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Agnico Eagle Mines currently has a consensus price target of $236.08, suggesting a potential upside of 34.30%. Given Agnico Eagle Mines' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Agnico Eagle Mines is more favorable than Golden Minerals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Agnico Eagle Mines	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.76
Golden Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

In the previous week, Agnico Eagle Mines had 37 more articles in the media than Golden Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 38 mentions for Agnico Eagle Mines and 1 mentions for Golden Minerals. Agnico Eagle Mines' average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Golden Minerals' score of 0.40 indicating that Agnico Eagle Mines is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Agnico Eagle Mines	18 Very Positive mention(s)	11 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Golden Minerals	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Agnico Eagle Mines has a beta of 0.58, indicating that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Golden Minerals has a beta of -0.8, indicating that its stock price is 180% less volatile than the broader market.

Agnico Eagle Mines has a net margin of 39.46% compared to Golden Minerals' net margin of 0.00%. Agnico Eagle Mines' return on equity of 21.09% beat Golden Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Agnico Eagle Mines	39.46%	21.09%	15.27%
Golden Minerals	N/A	-1,051.75%	-57.22%

Summary

Agnico Eagle Mines beats Golden Minerals on 15 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Golden Minerals compare to Barrick Mining?

Golden Minerals (NYSE:AUMN) and Barrick Mining (NYSE:B) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment and risk.

Golden Minerals has a beta of -0.8, meaning that its share price is 180% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Barrick Mining has a beta of 0.41, meaning that its share price is 59% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Barrick Mining had 24 more articles in the media than Golden Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Barrick Mining and 1 mentions for Golden Minerals. Barrick Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Golden Minerals' score of 0.40 indicating that Barrick Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Golden Minerals	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Barrick Mining	11 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	8 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Barrick Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Golden Minerals. Golden Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Barrick Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Golden Minerals	$300K	8.53	-$9.23M	-$0.15	N/A
Barrick Mining	$16.96B	4.02	$4.99B	$3.62	11.23

Barrick Mining has a net margin of 32.14% compared to Golden Minerals' net margin of 0.00%. Barrick Mining's return on equity of 14.81% beat Golden Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Golden Minerals	N/A	-1,051.75%	-57.22%
Barrick Mining	32.14%	14.81%	10.38%

Barrick Mining has a consensus target price of $53.46, suggesting a potential upside of 31.54%. Given Barrick Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Barrick Mining is more favorable than Golden Minerals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Golden Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Barrick Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	16 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.82

13.4% of Golden Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.8% of Barrick Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Golden Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.2% of Barrick Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Barrick Mining beats Golden Minerals on 16 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Golden Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding AUMN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

AUMN vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Golden Minerals	Gold & silver ores Industry	Materials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$2.56M	$915.54M	$4.83B	$23.20B
Dividend Yield	N/A	1.17%	5.01%	4.10%
P/E Ratio	-0.33	2.65	23.17	30.65
Price / Sales	8.53	11.32	7,306.08	24.50
Price / Cash	N/A	14.62	27.21	25.12
Price / Book	0.47	7.87	6.77	4.74
Net Income	-$9.23M	$14.80M	$157.11M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	9.83%	1.99%	1.56%	2.36%
1 Month Performance	-19.44%	-8.77%	-0.26%	1.58%
1 Year Performance	1.43%	50.96%	74.94%	28.42%

Golden Minerals Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
AUMN Golden Minerals	N/A	$0.17 flat	N/A	+1.4%	$2.56M	$300K	N/A	250	Gap Down
CHNR China Natural Resources	1.0825 of 5 stars	$3.92 -2.0%	N/A	-12.7%	$4.93M	N/A	N/A	80	Positive News
TMCR Metals Royalty Co Inc. The	N/A	$13.71 -1.2%	N/A	N/A	$0.00	N/A	N/A	10
ODVWZ Osisko Development	N/A	$0.15 -0.1%	N/A	N/A	$0.00	$35.48M	N/A	310
AEM Agnico Eagle Mines	4.897 of 5 stars	$195.89 -0.6%	$238.18 +21.6%	+49.4%	$98.62B	$11.91B	18.41	18,216

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:AUMN) was last updated on 5/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Golden Minerals (AUMN) Competitors

AUMN vs. CHNR, TMCR, ODVWZ, AEM, and B

How does Golden Minerals compare to China Natural Resources?

Summary

How does Golden Minerals compare to Metals Royalty Co Inc. The?

Summary

How does Golden Minerals compare to Osisko Development?

Summary

How does Golden Minerals compare to Agnico Eagle Mines?

Summary

How does Golden Minerals compare to Barrick Mining?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

AUMN vs. The Competition

Golden Minerals Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Golden Minerals (AUMN) Competitors

AUMN vs. CHNR, TMCR, ODVWZ, AEM, and B

How does Golden Minerals compare to China Natural Resources?

Which has more volatility and risk, AUMN or CHNR?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, AUMN or CHNR?

Do analysts rate AUMN or CHNR?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of AUMN or CHNR?

Is AUMN or CHNR more profitable?

Does the media favor AUMN or CHNR?

Summary

How does Golden Minerals compare to Metals Royalty Co Inc. The?

Does the media prefer TMCR or AUMN?

Is TMCR or AUMN more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in TMCR or AUMN?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, TMCR or AUMN?

Summary

How does Golden Minerals compare to Osisko Development?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, ODVWZ or AUMN?

Is ODVWZ or AUMN more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in ODVWZ or AUMN?

Does the media prefer ODVWZ or AUMN?

Summary

How does Golden Minerals compare to Agnico Eagle Mines?

Which has better earnings & valuation, AEM or AUMN?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in AEM or AUMN?

Do analysts prefer AEM or AUMN?

Does the media favor AEM or AUMN?

Which has more risk & volatility, AEM or AUMN?

Is AEM or AUMN more profitable?

Summary

How does Golden Minerals compare to Barrick Mining?

Which has more volatility & risk, AUMN or B?

Does the media prefer AUMN or B?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, AUMN or B?

Is AUMN or B more profitable?

Do analysts prefer AUMN or B?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of AUMN or B?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

AUMN vs. The Competition

Golden Minerals Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools