Go Pro
→ Trump's New Dollar (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free AUMN Stock Alerts

Golden Minerals (AUMN) Competitors

Golden Minerals logo
$0.21 0.00 (-1.69%)
As of 10:52 AM Eastern
Compare

AUMN vs. GRMLW, ODVWZ, B, BVN, and SBSW

Should you buy Golden Minerals stock or one of its competitors? Golden Minerals's main competitors and comparable companies include Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant (GRMLW), Osisko Development (ODVWZ), Barrick Mining (B), Buenaventura Mining (BVN), and Sibanye Gold (SBSW). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "precious metals & minerals" industry.

How does Golden Minerals compare to Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant?

Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant (NASDAQ:GRMLW) and Golden Minerals (NYSE:AUMN) are both materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability and risk.

In the previous week, Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant had 1 more articles in the media than Golden Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant and 0 mentions for Golden Minerals. Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Golden Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant Very Positive
Golden Minerals Neutral

13.4% of Golden Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 4.8% of Golden Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Golden Minerals.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Greenland Mines Ltd WarrantN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Golden Minerals$300K10.61-$9.23M-$0.12N/A

Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant's return on equity of 0.00% beat Golden Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Greenland Mines Ltd WarrantN/A N/A N/A
Golden Minerals N/A -1,051.75%-57.22%

Summary

Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant beats Golden Minerals on 4 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Golden Minerals compare to Osisko Development?

Osisko Development (NASDAQ:ODVWZ) and Golden Minerals (NYSE:AUMN) are both materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, dividends, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Osisko Development has higher revenue and earnings than Golden Minerals.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Osisko Development$37.69MN/AN/AN/AN/A
Golden Minerals$300K10.61-$9.23M-$0.12N/A

Osisko Development's return on equity of 0.00% beat Golden Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Osisko DevelopmentN/A N/A N/A
Golden Minerals N/A -1,051.75%-57.22%

13.4% of Golden Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.8% of Golden Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Osisko Development had 1 more articles in the media than Golden Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Osisko Development and 0 mentions for Golden Minerals. Osisko Development's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Golden Minerals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Osisko Development Neutral
Golden Minerals Neutral

Summary

Osisko Development beats Golden Minerals on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Golden Minerals compare to Barrick Mining?

Barrick Mining (NYSE:B) and Golden Minerals (NYSE:AUMN) are both materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and profitability.

90.8% of Barrick Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.4% of Golden Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 5.2% of Barrick Mining shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.8% of Golden Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Barrick Mining currently has a consensus target price of $52.57, suggesting a potential upside of 26.25%. Given Barrick Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Barrick Mining is more favorable than Golden Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Barrick Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
18 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.87
Golden Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Barrick Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Golden Minerals. Golden Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Barrick Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Barrick Mining$16.96B4.04$4.99B$3.8810.73
Golden Minerals$300K10.61-$9.23M-$0.12N/A

Barrick Mining has a net margin of 31.60% compared to Golden Minerals' net margin of 0.00%. Barrick Mining's return on equity of 16.02% beat Golden Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Barrick Mining31.60% 16.02% 11.22%
Golden Minerals N/A -1,051.75%-57.22%

In the previous week, Barrick Mining had 57 more articles in the media than Golden Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 57 mentions for Barrick Mining and 0 mentions for Golden Minerals. Barrick Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.49 beat Golden Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that Barrick Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Barrick Mining Neutral
Golden Minerals Neutral

Barrick Mining has a beta of 0.47, indicating that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Golden Minerals has a beta of -0.77, indicating that its stock price is 177% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Barrick Mining beats Golden Minerals on 16 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Golden Minerals compare to Buenaventura Mining?

Golden Minerals (NYSE:AUMN) and Buenaventura Mining (NYSE:BVN) are both materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, earnings, dividends and profitability.

Buenaventura Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Golden Minerals. Golden Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Buenaventura Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Golden Minerals$300K10.61-$9.23M-$0.12N/A
Buenaventura Mining$1.73B4.95$782.15M$4.427.65

Buenaventura Mining has a net margin of 50.88% compared to Golden Minerals' net margin of 0.00%. Buenaventura Mining's return on equity of 27.72% beat Golden Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Golden MineralsN/A -1,051.75% -57.22%
Buenaventura Mining 50.88%27.72%19.73%

In the previous week, Buenaventura Mining had 1 more articles in the media than Golden Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Buenaventura Mining and 0 mentions for Golden Minerals. Buenaventura Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.10 beat Golden Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that Buenaventura Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Golden Minerals Neutral
Buenaventura Mining Neutral

Buenaventura Mining has a consensus price target of $37.25, indicating a potential upside of 10.17%. Given Buenaventura Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Buenaventura Mining is more favorable than Golden Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Golden Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Buenaventura Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

13.4% of Golden Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 4.8% of Golden Minerals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 19.3% of Buenaventura Mining shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Golden Minerals has a beta of -0.77, indicating that its share price is 177% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Buenaventura Mining has a beta of 0.43, indicating that its share price is 57% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Buenaventura Mining beats Golden Minerals on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Golden Minerals compare to Sibanye Gold?

Golden Minerals (NYSE:AUMN) and Sibanye Gold (NYSE:SBSW) are both materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and risk.

Sibanye Gold has a consensus target price of $16.83, suggesting a potential upside of 56.29%. Given Sibanye Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Sibanye Gold is more favorable than Golden Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Golden Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Sibanye Gold
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.17

Sibanye Gold's return on equity of 0.00% beat Golden Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Golden MineralsN/A -1,051.75% -57.22%
Sibanye Gold N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Sibanye Gold had 5 more articles in the media than Golden Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Sibanye Gold and 0 mentions for Golden Minerals. Sibanye Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat Golden Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that Sibanye Gold is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Golden Minerals Neutral
Sibanye Gold Positive

Golden Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Sibanye Gold.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Golden Minerals$300K10.61-$9.23M-$0.12N/A
Sibanye Gold$7.25B1.05-$289.58MN/AN/A

13.4% of Golden Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.9% of Sibanye Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 4.8% of Golden Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Sibanye Gold shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Golden Minerals has a beta of -0.77, indicating that its stock price is 177% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sibanye Gold has a beta of 0.68, indicating that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Sibanye Gold beats Golden Minerals on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Golden Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for AUMN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding AUMN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

AUMN vs. The Competition

Export
MetricGolden MineralsMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$3.18M$3.77B$4.84B$24.33B
Dividend YieldN/A5.23%4.71%3.67%
P/E Ratio-0.4023.4121.9230.78
Price / Sales10.617,611.474,522.1321.27
Price / CashN/A29.6227.0532.80
Price / Book0.5810.388.826.82
Net Income-$9.23M$122.18M$154.16M$1.06B
7 Day Performance-4.55%1.36%1.01%0.55%
1 Month Performance10.53%7.90%6.62%3.13%
1 Year Performance-2.33%56.00%44.31%18.71%

Golden Minerals Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
AUMN
Golden Minerals
N/A$0.21
-1.7%		N/A-2.3%$3.18M$300KN/A250
GRMLW
Greenland Mines Ltd Warrant
N/A$0.14
-7.7%		N/A-4.3%$0.00N/AN/AN/A
ODVWZ
Osisko Development
N/A$0.08
+0.8%		N/AN/A$0.00$37.69MN/A310
B
Barrick Mining
4.9987 of 5 stars		$41.15
+7.7%		$52.46
+27.5%		+71.9%$62.89B$16.96B11.3727,000
BVN
Buenaventura Mining
3.2731 of 5 stars		$32.88
+1.9%		$37.25
+13.3%		+83.4%$8.37B$2.05B7.4415,984

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:AUMN) was last updated on 8/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump’s New Currency Reset
Trump is launching a new $250 bill - but that may be a distraction. Behind the scenes, Executive Order 14241 i...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your 10X AI demo is starting…
Keith Kaplan, the AI expert behind tools used by more than 100000 investors, built his models with an investme...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ray Dalio: Buy Gold. Get Paid.
Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater Associates, is urging investors to hold 15% of their portfolio in gold and c...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book is inside
The "Sucker's Bet" Most New Options Traders Fall For Most people who try options lose money the same way. ...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
CODE RED: AI Meltdown Imminent?
After correctly predicting the 2008 and 2020 stock market meltdowns, I believe this AI company is about to tri...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
Who Really Gets Rich from IPOs?
Peter Thiel turned a $500,000 stake in Meta into nearly $1 billion by investing eight years before its IPO. Tr...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
How a rare metal shortage sent gains up 2512 percent
In 2010, a rare earth metal called dysprosium surged 2,512 percent in two and a half years after China cut exp...
Awesomely | Sponsoredtc pixel