Do analysts rate CHNR or AUMN?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score China Natural Resources 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Golden Minerals 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has better valuation & earnings, CHNR or AUMN?

China Natural Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Golden Minerals. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio China Natural Resources N/A N/A -$180K N/A N/A Golden Minerals $300K 9.35 -$9.23M -$0.15 N/A

Is CHNR or AUMN more profitable?

China Natural Resources' return on equity of 0.00% beat Golden Minerals' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets China Natural Resources N/A N/A N/A Golden Minerals N/A -1,051.75% -57.22%

Do analysts rate AUMN or TMCR?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Golden Minerals 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Metals Royalty Co Inc. The 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Which has better earnings and valuation, AUMN or TMCR?

Metals Royalty Co Inc. The has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Golden Minerals. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Golden Minerals $300K 9.35 -$9.23M -$0.15 N/A Metals Royalty Co Inc. The N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Is AUMN or TMCR more profitable?

Metals Royalty Co Inc. The's return on equity of 0.00% beat Golden Minerals' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Golden Minerals N/A -1,051.75% -57.22% Metals Royalty Co Inc. The N/A N/A N/A

Which has higher valuation and earnings, ODVWZ or AUMN?

Osisko Development has higher revenue and earnings than Golden Minerals. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Osisko Development $37.69M N/A N/A N/A N/A Golden Minerals $300K 9.35 -$9.23M -$0.15 N/A

Is ODVWZ or AUMN more profitable?

Osisko Development's return on equity of 0.00% beat Golden Minerals' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Osisko Development N/A N/A N/A Golden Minerals N/A -1,051.75% -57.22%

Do analysts recommend AEM or AUMN?

Agnico Eagle Mines currently has a consensus target price of $236.08, suggesting a potential upside of 35.33%. Given Agnico Eagle Mines' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Agnico Eagle Mines is more favorable than Golden Minerals. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Agnico Eagle Mines 0 Sell rating(s) 5 Hold rating(s) 11 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.76 Golden Minerals 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Do analysts prefer AUMN or B?

Barrick Mining has a consensus price target of $53.46, suggesting a potential upside of 26.06%. Given Barrick Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Barrick Mining is more favorable than Golden Minerals. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Golden Minerals 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Barrick Mining 0 Sell rating(s) 5 Hold rating(s) 16 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.82

Golden Minerals (AUMN) Competitors

$0.19 +0.01 (+6.51%)

As of 09:54 AM Eastern

Compare

AUMN vs. CHNR, TMCR, ODVWZ, AEM, and B

Should you buy Golden Minerals stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Golden Minerals with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Golden Minerals include China Natural Resources (CHNR), Metals Royalty Co Inc. The (TMCR), Osisko Development (ODVWZ), Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM), and Barrick Mining (B). These companies are all part of the "precious metals" industry.

How does Golden Minerals compare to China Natural Resources?

China Natural Resources (NASDAQ:CHNR) and Golden Minerals (NYSE:AUMN) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, risk and media sentiment.

In the previous week, China Natural Resources had 3 more articles in the media than Golden Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for China Natural Resources and 0 mentions for Golden Minerals. China Natural Resources' average media sentiment score of 1.25 beat Golden Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that China Natural Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
China Natural Resources	Positive
Golden Minerals	Neutral

China Natural Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Golden Minerals.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
China Natural Resources	N/A	N/A	-$180K	N/A	N/A
Golden Minerals	$300K	9.35	-$9.23M	-$0.15	N/A

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
China Natural Resources	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Golden Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

0.0% of China Natural Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.4% of Golden Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 23.2% of China Natural Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Golden Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

China Natural Resources' return on equity of 0.00% beat Golden Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
China Natural Resources	N/A	N/A	N/A
Golden Minerals	N/A	-1,051.75%	-57.22%

China Natural Resources has a beta of 0.09, indicating that its share price is 91% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Golden Minerals has a beta of -0.79, indicating that its share price is 179% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

China Natural Resources beats Golden Minerals on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Golden Minerals compare to Metals Royalty Co Inc. The?

Golden Minerals (NYSE:AUMN) and Metals Royalty Co Inc. The (NASDAQ:TMCR) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability and risk.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Golden Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Metals Royalty Co Inc. The	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

In the previous week, Metals Royalty Co Inc. The had 4 more articles in the media than Golden Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Metals Royalty Co Inc. The and 0 mentions for Golden Minerals. Metals Royalty Co Inc. The's average media sentiment score of 0.22 beat Golden Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that Metals Royalty Co Inc. The is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Golden Minerals	Neutral
Metals Royalty Co Inc. The	Neutral

13.4% of Golden Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Golden Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Metals Royalty Co Inc. The has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Golden Minerals.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Golden Minerals	$300K	9.35	-$9.23M	-$0.15	N/A
Metals Royalty Co Inc. The	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

Metals Royalty Co Inc. The's return on equity of 0.00% beat Golden Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Golden Minerals	N/A	-1,051.75%	-57.22%
Metals Royalty Co Inc. The	N/A	N/A	N/A

Summary

Metals Royalty Co Inc. The beats Golden Minerals on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Golden Minerals compare to Osisko Development?

Osisko Development (NASDAQ:ODVWZ) and Golden Minerals (NYSE:AUMN) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

Osisko Development has higher revenue and earnings than Golden Minerals.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Osisko Development	$37.69M	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Golden Minerals	$300K	9.35	-$9.23M	-$0.15	N/A

Osisko Development's return on equity of 0.00% beat Golden Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Osisko Development	N/A	N/A	N/A
Golden Minerals	N/A	-1,051.75%	-57.22%

In the previous week, Osisko Development had 1 more articles in the media than Golden Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Osisko Development and 0 mentions for Golden Minerals. Osisko Development's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Golden Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that Osisko Development is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Osisko Development	Very Positive
Golden Minerals	Neutral

13.4% of Golden Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Golden Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Osisko Development beats Golden Minerals on 5 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Golden Minerals compare to Agnico Eagle Mines?

Agnico Eagle Mines (NYSE:AEM) and Golden Minerals (NYSE:AUMN) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Agnico Eagle Mines had 21 more articles in the media than Golden Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for Agnico Eagle Mines and 0 mentions for Golden Minerals. Agnico Eagle Mines' average media sentiment score of 1.21 beat Golden Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that Agnico Eagle Mines is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Agnico Eagle Mines	Positive
Golden Minerals	Neutral

68.3% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.4% of Golden Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Golden Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Agnico Eagle Mines has higher revenue and earnings than Golden Minerals. Golden Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Agnico Eagle Mines, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Agnico Eagle Mines	$11.91B	7.33	$4.46B	$10.64	16.40
Golden Minerals	$300K	9.35	-$9.23M	-$0.15	N/A

Agnico Eagle Mines has a beta of 0.56, suggesting that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Golden Minerals has a beta of -0.79, suggesting that its share price is 179% less volatile than the broader market.

Agnico Eagle Mines currently has a consensus target price of $236.08, suggesting a potential upside of 35.33%. Given Agnico Eagle Mines' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Agnico Eagle Mines is more favorable than Golden Minerals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Agnico Eagle Mines	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.76
Golden Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Agnico Eagle Mines has a net margin of 39.46% compared to Golden Minerals' net margin of 0.00%. Agnico Eagle Mines' return on equity of 21.09% beat Golden Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Agnico Eagle Mines	39.46%	21.09%	15.27%
Golden Minerals	N/A	-1,051.75%	-57.22%

Summary

Agnico Eagle Mines beats Golden Minerals on 15 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Golden Minerals compare to Barrick Mining?

Golden Minerals (NYSE:AUMN) and Barrick Mining (NYSE:B) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, media sentiment, valuation and institutional ownership.

Barrick Mining has a net margin of 32.14% compared to Golden Minerals' net margin of 0.00%. Barrick Mining's return on equity of 14.81% beat Golden Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Golden Minerals	N/A	-1,051.75%	-57.22%
Barrick Mining	32.14%	14.81%	10.38%

Barrick Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Golden Minerals. Golden Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Barrick Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Golden Minerals	$300K	9.35	-$9.23M	-$0.15	N/A
Barrick Mining	$16.96B	4.16	$4.99B	$3.62	11.72

Barrick Mining has a consensus price target of $53.46, suggesting a potential upside of 26.06%. Given Barrick Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Barrick Mining is more favorable than Golden Minerals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Golden Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Barrick Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	16 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.82

In the previous week, Barrick Mining had 22 more articles in the media than Golden Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Barrick Mining and 0 mentions for Golden Minerals. Barrick Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Golden Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that Barrick Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Golden Minerals	Neutral
Barrick Mining	Positive

Golden Minerals has a beta of -0.79, indicating that its share price is 179% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Barrick Mining has a beta of 0.43, indicating that its share price is 57% less volatile than the broader market.

13.4% of Golden Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.8% of Barrick Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Golden Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Barrick Mining shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Barrick Mining beats Golden Minerals on 15 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Golden Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding AUMN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

AUMN vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Golden Minerals	Gold & silver ores Industry	Materials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$2.81M	$962.37M	$4.92B	$23.47B
Dividend Yield	N/A	1.17%	4.99%	4.05%
P/E Ratio	-0.36	76.14	23.86	31.67
Price / Sales	9.35	11.62	5,584.56	111.34
Price / Cash	N/A	14.37	24.28	18.65
Price / Book	0.52	8.12	9.34	4.73
Net Income	-$9.23M	$14.80M	$156.77M	$1.08B
7 Day Performance	12.83%	0.56%	2.64%	2.61%
1 Month Performance	21.83%	-5.32%	-1.84%	3.97%
1 Year Performance	2.53%	35.37%	61.29%	24.87%

Golden Minerals Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
AUMN Golden Minerals	N/A	$0.19 +6.5%	N/A	-3.7%	$2.81M	$300K	N/A	250	Gap Up
CHNR China Natural Resources	1.3063 of 5 stars	$3.76 -11.9%	N/A	-5.1%	$5.36M	N/A	N/A	80	Positive News Short Interest Decrease Gap Up High Trading Volume
TMCR Metals Royalty Co Inc. The	N/A	$10.20 -0.5%	N/A	N/A	$0.00	N/A	N/A	10	Positive News Analyst Revision
ODVWZ Osisko Development	N/A	$0.11 -2.6%	N/A	N/A	$0.00	$37.69M	N/A	310	Positive News Gap Down
AEM Agnico Eagle Mines	4.8395 of 5 stars	$152.12 -4.9%	$236.08 +55.2%	+30.7%	$80.04B	$13.54B	14.30	18,216	Positive News Analyst Downgrade Analyst Revision Gap Up

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:AUMN) was last updated on 6/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Golden Minerals (AUMN) Competitors

AUMN vs. CHNR, TMCR, ODVWZ, AEM, and B

How does Golden Minerals compare to China Natural Resources?

Summary

How does Golden Minerals compare to Metals Royalty Co Inc. The?

Summary

How does Golden Minerals compare to Osisko Development?

Summary

How does Golden Minerals compare to Agnico Eagle Mines?

Summary

How does Golden Minerals compare to Barrick Mining?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

AUMN vs. The Competition

Golden Minerals Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Golden Minerals (AUMN) Competitors

AUMN vs. CHNR, TMCR, ODVWZ, AEM, and B

How does Golden Minerals compare to China Natural Resources?

Does the media favor CHNR or AUMN?

Which has better valuation & earnings, CHNR or AUMN?

Do analysts rate CHNR or AUMN?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in CHNR or AUMN?

Is CHNR or AUMN more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, CHNR or AUMN?

Summary

How does Golden Minerals compare to Metals Royalty Co Inc. The?

Do analysts rate AUMN or TMCR?

Does the media refer more to AUMN or TMCR?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of AUMN or TMCR?

Which has better earnings and valuation, AUMN or TMCR?

Is AUMN or TMCR more profitable?

Summary

How does Golden Minerals compare to Osisko Development?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, ODVWZ or AUMN?

Is ODVWZ or AUMN more profitable?

Does the media favor ODVWZ or AUMN?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in ODVWZ or AUMN?

Summary

How does Golden Minerals compare to Agnico Eagle Mines?

Does the media refer more to AEM or AUMN?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of AEM or AUMN?

Which has better valuation and earnings, AEM or AUMN?

Which has more risk & volatility, AEM or AUMN?

Do analysts recommend AEM or AUMN?

Is AEM or AUMN more profitable?

Summary

How does Golden Minerals compare to Barrick Mining?

Is AUMN or B more profitable?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, AUMN or B?

Do analysts prefer AUMN or B?

Does the media refer more to AUMN or B?

Which has more volatility and risk, AUMN or B?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of AUMN or B?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

AUMN vs. The Competition

Golden Minerals Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools