Do analysts recommend MAPS or UIS?

Unisys has a consensus target price of $4.50, suggesting a potential upside of 83.67%. Given Unisys' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Unisys is more favorable than WM Technology. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score WM Technology 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Unisys 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.20

Which has better valuation & earnings, MAPS or UIS?

WM Technology has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Unisys. Unisys is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than WM Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio WM Technology $174.70M 0.33 $1.96M $0.02 18.20 Unisys $1.95B 0.09 -$339.80M -$5.89 N/A

Is MAPS or UIS more profitable?

WM Technology has a net margin of 1.12% compared to Unisys' net margin of -21.65%. WM Technology's return on equity of 1.51% beat Unisys' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets WM Technology 1.12% 1.51% 1.04% Unisys -21.65% -14.09% 2.41%

Does the media prefer MAPS or UIS?

In the previous week, Unisys had 2 more articles in the media than WM Technology. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Unisys and 1 mentions for WM Technology. Unisys' average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat WM Technology's score of 0.00 indicating that Unisys is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment WM Technology 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Unisys 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate MAPS or DAVA?

Endava has a consensus price target of $5.50, suggesting a potential upside of 95.73%. Given Endava's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Endava is more favorable than WM Technology. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score WM Technology 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Endava 2 Sell rating(s) 5 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.88

Which has higher earnings & valuation, MAPS or DAVA?

Endava has higher revenue and earnings than WM Technology. Endava is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than WM Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio WM Technology $174.70M 0.33 $1.96M $0.02 18.20 Endava $999.23M 0.16 $27.45M -$10.51 N/A

Is MAPS or DAVA more profitable?

WM Technology has a net margin of 1.12% compared to Endava's net margin of -57.01%. Endava's return on equity of 2.48% beat WM Technology's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets WM Technology 1.12% 1.51% 1.04% Endava -57.01% 2.48% 1.40%

Does the media refer more to MAPS or DAVA?

In the previous week, Endava had 6 more articles in the media than WM Technology. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Endava and 1 mentions for WM Technology. WM Technology's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Endava's score of -0.15 indicating that WM Technology is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment WM Technology 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Endava 0 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts rate MAPS or AGPU?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score WM Technology 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Axe Compute 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, MAPS or AGPU?

WM Technology has higher revenue and earnings than Axe Compute. Axe Compute is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than WM Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio WM Technology $174.70M 0.33 $1.96M $0.02 18.20 Axe Compute $120K 1,215.02 -$233.10M -$5.75 N/A

Is MAPS or AGPU more profitable?

WM Technology has a net margin of 1.12% compared to Axe Compute's net margin of -7,769.61%. WM Technology's return on equity of 1.51% beat Axe Compute's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets WM Technology 1.12% 1.51% 1.04% Axe Compute -7,769.61% -1,606.56% -355.39%

Does the media refer more to MAPS or AGPU?

In the previous week, Axe Compute had 1 more articles in the media than WM Technology. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Axe Compute and 1 mentions for WM Technology. Axe Compute's average media sentiment score of 0.25 beat WM Technology's score of 0.00 indicating that Axe Compute is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment WM Technology 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Axe Compute 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts prefer MAPS or TCX?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score WM Technology 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Tucows 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, MAPS or TCX?

WM Technology has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Tucows. Tucows is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than WM Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio WM Technology $174.70M 0.33 $1.96M $0.02 18.20 Tucows $390.30M 0.30 -$75.82M -$7.53 N/A

Is MAPS or TCX more profitable?

WM Technology has a net margin of 1.12% compared to Tucows' net margin of -21.20%. WM Technology's return on equity of 1.51% beat Tucows' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets WM Technology 1.12% 1.51% 1.04% Tucows -21.20% N/A -9.48%

Do analysts prefer ATGL or MAPS?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Alpha Technology Group 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 WM Technology 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, ATGL or MAPS?

WM Technology has higher revenue and earnings than Alpha Technology Group. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Alpha Technology Group $950K 81.68 -$9.05M N/A N/A WM Technology $174.70M 0.33 $1.96M $0.02 18.20

Does the media favor ATGL or MAPS?

In the previous week, Alpha Technology Group and Alpha Technology Group both had 1 articles in the media. Alpha Technology Group's average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat WM Technology's score of 0.00 indicating that Alpha Technology Group is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Alpha Technology Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral WM Technology 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

WM Technology (MAPS) Competitors

$0.36 +0.01 (+2.48%)

As of 03:59 PM Eastern

Compare

MAPS vs. UIS, DAVA, AGPU, TCX, and ATGL

Should you buy WM Technology stock or one of its competitors? WM Technology's main competitors and comparable companies include Unisys (UIS), Endava (DAVA), Axe Compute (AGPU), Tucows (TCX), and Alpha Technology Group (ATGL). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "it services" industry.

How does WM Technology compare to Unisys?

WM Technology (NASDAQ:MAPS) and Unisys (NYSE:UIS) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations and valuation.

WM Technology has a beta of 0.87, suggesting that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Unisys has a beta of 1.88, suggesting that its stock price is 88% more volatile than the broader market.

WM Technology has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Unisys. Unisys is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than WM Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
WM Technology	$174.70M	0.33	$1.96M	$0.02	18.20
Unisys	$1.95B	0.09	-$339.80M	-$5.89	N/A

WM Technology has a net margin of 1.12% compared to Unisys' net margin of -21.65%. WM Technology's return on equity of 1.51% beat Unisys' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
WM Technology	1.12%	1.51%	1.04%
Unisys	-21.65%	-14.09%	2.41%

In the previous week, Unisys had 2 more articles in the media than WM Technology. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Unisys and 1 mentions for WM Technology. Unisys' average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat WM Technology's score of 0.00 indicating that Unisys is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
WM Technology	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Unisys	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

22.0% of WM Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.9% of Unisys shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.7% of WM Technology shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 11.6% of Unisys shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Unisys has a consensus target price of $4.50, suggesting a potential upside of 83.67%. Given Unisys' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Unisys is more favorable than WM Technology.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
WM Technology	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Unisys	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.20

Summary

Unisys beats WM Technology on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does WM Technology compare to Endava?

WM Technology (NASDAQ:MAPS) and Endava (NYSE:DAVA) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, earnings and valuation.

Endava has higher revenue and earnings than WM Technology. Endava is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than WM Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
WM Technology	$174.70M	0.33	$1.96M	$0.02	18.20
Endava	$999.23M	0.16	$27.45M	-$10.51	N/A

WM Technology has a net margin of 1.12% compared to Endava's net margin of -57.01%. Endava's return on equity of 2.48% beat WM Technology's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
WM Technology	1.12%	1.51%	1.04%
Endava	-57.01%	2.48%	1.40%

WM Technology has a beta of 0.87, meaning that its share price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Endava has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.

22.0% of WM Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.2% of Endava shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.7% of WM Technology shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 18.8% of Endava shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Endava had 6 more articles in the media than WM Technology. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Endava and 1 mentions for WM Technology. WM Technology's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Endava's score of -0.15 indicating that WM Technology is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
WM Technology	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Endava	0 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Endava has a consensus price target of $5.50, suggesting a potential upside of 95.73%. Given Endava's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Endava is more favorable than WM Technology.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
WM Technology	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Endava	2 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.88

Summary

Endava beats WM Technology on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does WM Technology compare to Axe Compute?

WM Technology (NASDAQ:MAPS) and Axe Compute (NASDAQ:AGPU) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, risk, earnings and profitability.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
WM Technology	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Axe Compute	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

WM Technology has a net margin of 1.12% compared to Axe Compute's net margin of -7,769.61%. WM Technology's return on equity of 1.51% beat Axe Compute's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
WM Technology	1.12%	1.51%	1.04%
Axe Compute	-7,769.61%	-1,606.56%	-355.39%

In the previous week, Axe Compute had 1 more articles in the media than WM Technology. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Axe Compute and 1 mentions for WM Technology. Axe Compute's average media sentiment score of 0.25 beat WM Technology's score of 0.00 indicating that Axe Compute is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
WM Technology	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Axe Compute	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

22.0% of WM Technology shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.0% of Axe Compute shares are held by institutional investors. 19.7% of WM Technology shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Axe Compute shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

WM Technology has higher revenue and earnings than Axe Compute. Axe Compute is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than WM Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
WM Technology	$174.70M	0.33	$1.96M	$0.02	18.20
Axe Compute	$120K	1,215.02	-$233.10M	-$5.75	N/A

WM Technology has a beta of 0.87, indicating that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Axe Compute has a beta of 3.47, indicating that its stock price is 247% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

WM Technology beats Axe Compute on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does WM Technology compare to Tucows?

WM Technology (NASDAQ:MAPS) and Tucows (NASDAQ:TCX) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
WM Technology	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Tucows	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

WM Technology has a beta of 0.87, indicating that its share price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tucows has a beta of 0.85, indicating that its share price is 15% less volatile than the broader market.

22.0% of WM Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.6% of Tucows shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.7% of WM Technology shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 8.4% of Tucows shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

WM Technology has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Tucows. Tucows is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than WM Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
WM Technology	$174.70M	0.33	$1.96M	$0.02	18.20
Tucows	$390.30M	0.30	-$75.82M	-$7.53	N/A

WM Technology has a net margin of 1.12% compared to Tucows' net margin of -21.20%. WM Technology's return on equity of 1.51% beat Tucows' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
WM Technology	1.12%	1.51%	1.04%
Tucows	-21.20%	N/A	-9.48%

In the previous week, WM Technology had 1 more articles in the media than Tucows. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for WM Technology and 0 mentions for Tucows. WM Technology's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Tucows'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
WM Technology	Neutral
Tucows	Neutral

Summary

WM Technology beats Tucows on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does WM Technology compare to Alpha Technology Group?

Alpha Technology Group (NASDAQ:ATGL) and WM Technology (NASDAQ:MAPS) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, risk, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Alpha Technology Group	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
WM Technology	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

WM Technology has higher revenue and earnings than Alpha Technology Group.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Alpha Technology Group	$950K	81.68	-$9.05M	N/A	N/A
WM Technology	$174.70M	0.33	$1.96M	$0.02	18.20

Alpha Technology Group has a beta of 3.26, meaning that its share price is 226% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, WM Technology has a beta of 0.87, meaning that its share price is 13% less volatile than the broader market.

WM Technology has a net margin of 1.12% compared to Alpha Technology Group's net margin of 0.00%. WM Technology's return on equity of 1.51% beat Alpha Technology Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Alpha Technology Group	N/A	N/A	N/A
WM Technology	1.12%	1.51%	1.04%

In the previous week, Alpha Technology Group and Alpha Technology Group both had 1 articles in the media. Alpha Technology Group's average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat WM Technology's score of 0.00 indicating that Alpha Technology Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Alpha Technology Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
WM Technology	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

22.0% of WM Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.7% of WM Technology shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

WM Technology beats Alpha Technology Group on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get WM Technology News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MAPS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

MAPS vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	WM Technology	IT Services Industry	Technology Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$57.89M	$10.70B	$30.33B	$12.97B
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.84%	2.75%	12.80%
P/E Ratio	18.21	14.07	78.43	25.77
Price / Sales	0.33	71.57	590.71	90.39
Price / Cash	3.31	45.64	46.90	34.72
Price / Book	0.43	8.42	7.96	6.36
Net Income	$1.96M	$271.17M	$701.04M	$358.17M
7 Day Performance	2.25%	1.50%	1.43%	0.54%
1 Month Performance	-9.02%	-1.24%	-1.65%	-2.95%
1 Year Performance	-70.88%	24.38%	177.99%	6.08%

WM Technology Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
MAPS WM Technology	0.3778 of 5 stars	$0.36 +2.5%	N/A	-71.6%	$57.89M	$174.70M	18.21	610
UIS Unisys	4.0449 of 5 stars	$2.51 +0.2%	$4.50 +79.6%	-40.1%	$182.67M	$1.95B	N/A	15,000
DAVA Endava	4.0393 of 5 stars	$2.99 -0.3%	$5.50 +83.8%	-69.6%	$168.18M	$727.60M	N/A	11,225	News Coverage
AGPU Axe Compute	0.3861 of 5 stars	$11.06 +2.8%	N/A	N/A	$128.19M	$120K	N/A	13	Gap Up
TCX Tucows	0.043 of 5 stars	$10.31 -1.4%	N/A	-45.6%	$115.29M	$394.44M	N/A	1,000	Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:MAPS) was last updated on 9/21/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

WM Technology (MAPS) Competitors

MAPS vs. UIS, DAVA, AGPU, TCX, and ATGL

How does WM Technology compare to Unisys?

Summary

How does WM Technology compare to Endava?

Summary

How does WM Technology compare to Axe Compute?

Summary

How does WM Technology compare to Tucows?

Summary

How does WM Technology compare to Alpha Technology Group?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MAPS vs. The Competition

WM Technology Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

WM Technology (MAPS) Competitors

MAPS vs. UIS, DAVA, AGPU, TCX, and ATGL

How does WM Technology compare to Unisys?

Which has more volatility & risk, MAPS or UIS?

Which has better valuation & earnings, MAPS or UIS?

Is MAPS or UIS more profitable?

Does the media prefer MAPS or UIS?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of MAPS or UIS?

Do analysts recommend MAPS or UIS?

Summary

How does WM Technology compare to Endava?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, MAPS or DAVA?

Is MAPS or DAVA more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, MAPS or DAVA?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of MAPS or DAVA?

Does the media refer more to MAPS or DAVA?

Do analysts rate MAPS or DAVA?

Summary

How does WM Technology compare to Axe Compute?

Do analysts rate MAPS or AGPU?

Is MAPS or AGPU more profitable?

Does the media refer more to MAPS or AGPU?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in MAPS or AGPU?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, MAPS or AGPU?

Which has more volatility and risk, MAPS or AGPU?

Summary

How does WM Technology compare to Tucows?

Do analysts prefer MAPS or TCX?

Which has more risk and volatility, MAPS or TCX?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in MAPS or TCX?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, MAPS or TCX?

Is MAPS or TCX more profitable?

Does the media refer more to MAPS or TCX?

Summary

How does WM Technology compare to Alpha Technology Group?

Do analysts prefer ATGL or MAPS?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, ATGL or MAPS?

Which has more risk & volatility, ATGL or MAPS?

Is ATGL or MAPS more profitable?

Does the media favor ATGL or MAPS?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in ATGL or MAPS?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MAPS vs. The Competition

WM Technology Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools