Do analysts recommend UIS or MAPS?

Unisys currently has a consensus price target of $4.50, suggesting a potential upside of 56.52%. Given Unisys' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Unisys is more favorable than WM Technology. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Unisys 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.20 WM Technology 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, UIS or MAPS?

WM Technology has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Unisys. Unisys is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than WM Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Unisys $1.95B 0.11 -$339.80M -$5.89 N/A WM Technology $174.70M 0.37 $1.96M $0.02 20.50

Is UIS or MAPS more profitable?

WM Technology has a net margin of 1.12% compared to Unisys' net margin of -21.65%. WM Technology's return on equity of 1.51% beat Unisys' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Unisys -21.65% -14.09% 2.41% WM Technology 1.12% 1.51% 1.04%

Does the media refer more to UIS or MAPS?

In the previous week, Unisys had 4 more articles in the media than WM Technology. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Unisys and 1 mentions for WM Technology. Unisys' average media sentiment score of 0.38 beat WM Technology's score of 0.00 indicating that Unisys is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Unisys 0 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral WM Technology 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts recommend MAPS or III?

Information Services Group has a consensus target price of $5.50, indicating a potential upside of 7.46%. Given Information Services Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Information Services Group is more favorable than WM Technology. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score WM Technology 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Information Services Group 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50

Does the media prefer MAPS or III?

In the previous week, Information Services Group had 7 more articles in the media than WM Technology. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Information Services Group and 1 mentions for WM Technology. Information Services Group's average media sentiment score of 0.61 beat WM Technology's score of 0.00 indicating that Information Services Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment WM Technology 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Information Services Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer MAPS or SLNH?

Soluna has a consensus price target of $4.00, suggesting a potential upside of 218.73%. Given Soluna's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Soluna is more favorable than WM Technology. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score WM Technology 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Soluna 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, MAPS or SLNH?

WM Technology has higher revenue and earnings than Soluna. Soluna is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than WM Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio WM Technology $174.70M 0.37 $1.96M $0.02 20.50 Soluna $29.72M 6.66 -$53.41M -$1.63 N/A

Is MAPS or SLNH more profitable?

WM Technology has a net margin of 1.12% compared to Soluna's net margin of -190.87%. WM Technology's return on equity of 1.51% beat Soluna's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets WM Technology 1.12% 1.51% 1.04% Soluna -190.87% -64.80% -34.02%

Does the media prefer MAPS or SLNH?

In the previous week, WM Technology and WM Technology both had 1 articles in the media. WM Technology's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Soluna'saverage media sentiment score. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment WM Technology 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Soluna 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts prefer DAVA or MAPS?

Endava currently has a consensus price target of $5.50, suggesting a potential upside of 80.74%. Given Endava's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Endava is more favorable than WM Technology. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Endava 2 Sell rating(s) 5 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.88 WM Technology 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has higher earnings and valuation, DAVA or MAPS?

Endava has higher revenue and earnings than WM Technology. Endava is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than WM Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Endava $999.23M 0.17 $27.45M -$10.51 N/A WM Technology $174.70M 0.37 $1.96M $0.02 20.50

Is DAVA or MAPS more profitable?

WM Technology has a net margin of 1.12% compared to Endava's net margin of -57.01%. Endava's return on equity of 2.48% beat WM Technology's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Endava -57.01% 2.48% 1.40% WM Technology 1.12% 1.51% 1.04%

Does the media refer more to DAVA or MAPS?

In the previous week, Endava had 1 more articles in the media than WM Technology. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Endava and 1 mentions for WM Technology. Endava's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat WM Technology's score of 0.00 indicating that Endava is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Endava 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive WM Technology 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts rate MAPS or TCX?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score WM Technology 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Tucows 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has higher earnings and valuation, MAPS or TCX?

WM Technology has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Tucows. Tucows is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than WM Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio WM Technology $174.70M 0.37 $1.96M $0.02 20.50 Tucows $390.30M 0.37 -$75.82M -$7.53 N/A

Is MAPS or TCX more profitable?

WM Technology has a net margin of 1.12% compared to Tucows' net margin of -21.20%. WM Technology's return on equity of 1.51% beat Tucows' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets WM Technology 1.12% 1.51% 1.04% Tucows -21.20% N/A -9.46%

Does the media favor MAPS or TCX?

In the previous week, Tucows had 5 more articles in the media than WM Technology. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Tucows and 1 mentions for WM Technology. Tucows' average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat WM Technology's score of 0.00 indicating that Tucows is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment WM Technology 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Tucows 2 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

WM Technology (MAPS) Competitors

$0.41 0.00 (0.00%)

As of 10:22 AM Eastern

Compare

MAPS vs. UIS, III, SLNH, DAVA, and TCX

Should you buy WM Technology stock or one of its competitors? WM Technology's main competitors and comparable companies include Unisys (UIS), Information Services Group (III), Soluna (SLNH), Endava (DAVA), and Tucows (TCX). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "it services" industry.

How does WM Technology compare to Unisys?

Unisys (NYSE:UIS) and WM Technology (NASDAQ:MAPS) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings and profitability.

WM Technology has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Unisys. Unisys is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than WM Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Unisys	$1.95B	0.11	-$339.80M	-$5.89	N/A
WM Technology	$174.70M	0.37	$1.96M	$0.02	20.50

In the previous week, Unisys had 4 more articles in the media than WM Technology. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Unisys and 1 mentions for WM Technology. Unisys' average media sentiment score of 0.38 beat WM Technology's score of 0.00 indicating that Unisys is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Unisys	0 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
WM Technology	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Unisys currently has a consensus price target of $4.50, suggesting a potential upside of 56.52%. Given Unisys' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Unisys is more favorable than WM Technology.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Unisys	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.20
WM Technology	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Unisys has a beta of 1.9, indicating that its stock price is 90% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, WM Technology has a beta of 0.87, indicating that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market.

WM Technology has a net margin of 1.12% compared to Unisys' net margin of -21.65%. WM Technology's return on equity of 1.51% beat Unisys' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Unisys	-21.65%	-14.09%	2.41%
WM Technology	1.12%	1.51%	1.04%

86.9% of Unisys shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.0% of WM Technology shares are held by institutional investors. 11.6% of Unisys shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.7% of WM Technology shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Unisys beats WM Technology on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does WM Technology compare to Information Services Group?

WM Technology (NASDAQ:MAPS) and Information Services Group (NASDAQ:III) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, dividends and institutional ownership.

Information Services Group has higher revenue and earnings than WM Technology. WM Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Information Services Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
WM Technology	$174.70M	0.37	$1.96M	$0.02	20.50
Information Services Group	$244.73M	1.00	$9.34M	$0.23	22.25

Information Services Group has a net margin of 4.67% compared to WM Technology's net margin of 1.12%. Information Services Group's return on equity of 13.59% beat WM Technology's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
WM Technology	1.12%	1.51%	1.04%
Information Services Group	4.67%	13.59%	6.20%

WM Technology has a beta of 0.87, suggesting that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Information Services Group has a beta of 1.1, suggesting that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Information Services Group had 7 more articles in the media than WM Technology. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Information Services Group and 1 mentions for WM Technology. Information Services Group's average media sentiment score of 0.61 beat WM Technology's score of 0.00 indicating that Information Services Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
WM Technology	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Information Services Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Information Services Group has a consensus target price of $5.50, indicating a potential upside of 7.46%. Given Information Services Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Information Services Group is more favorable than WM Technology.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
WM Technology	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Information Services Group	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

22.0% of WM Technology shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.1% of Information Services Group shares are held by institutional investors. 19.7% of WM Technology shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 15.8% of Information Services Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Information Services Group beats WM Technology on 15 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does WM Technology compare to Soluna?

WM Technology (NASDAQ:MAPS) and Soluna (NASDAQ:SLNH) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and risk.

In the previous week, WM Technology and WM Technology both had 1 articles in the media. WM Technology's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Soluna'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
WM Technology	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Soluna	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

WM Technology has a beta of 0.87, meaning that its share price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Soluna has a beta of 5.13, meaning that its share price is 413% more volatile than the broader market.

WM Technology has higher revenue and earnings than Soluna. Soluna is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than WM Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
WM Technology	$174.70M	0.37	$1.96M	$0.02	20.50
Soluna	$29.72M	6.66	-$53.41M	-$1.63	N/A

Soluna has a consensus price target of $4.00, suggesting a potential upside of 218.73%. Given Soluna's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Soluna is more favorable than WM Technology.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
WM Technology	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Soluna	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

WM Technology has a net margin of 1.12% compared to Soluna's net margin of -190.87%. WM Technology's return on equity of 1.51% beat Soluna's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
WM Technology	1.12%	1.51%	1.04%
Soluna	-190.87%	-64.80%	-34.02%

22.0% of WM Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.2% of Soluna shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.7% of WM Technology shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 10.1% of Soluna shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

WM Technology beats Soluna on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does WM Technology compare to Endava?

Endava (NYSE:DAVA) and WM Technology (NASDAQ:MAPS) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and profitability.

62.2% of Endava shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.0% of WM Technology shares are held by institutional investors. 18.8% of Endava shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.7% of WM Technology shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Endava currently has a consensus price target of $5.50, suggesting a potential upside of 80.74%. Given Endava's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Endava is more favorable than WM Technology.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Endava	2 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.88
WM Technology	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Endava has higher revenue and earnings than WM Technology. Endava is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than WM Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Endava	$999.23M	0.17	$27.45M	-$10.51	N/A
WM Technology	$174.70M	0.37	$1.96M	$0.02	20.50

WM Technology has a net margin of 1.12% compared to Endava's net margin of -57.01%. Endava's return on equity of 2.48% beat WM Technology's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Endava	-57.01%	2.48%	1.40%
WM Technology	1.12%	1.51%	1.04%

In the previous week, Endava had 1 more articles in the media than WM Technology. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Endava and 1 mentions for WM Technology. Endava's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat WM Technology's score of 0.00 indicating that Endava is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Endava	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
WM Technology	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Endava has a beta of 1.02, indicating that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, WM Technology has a beta of 0.87, indicating that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Endava beats WM Technology on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does WM Technology compare to Tucows?

WM Technology (NASDAQ:MAPS) and Tucows (NASDAQ:TCX) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
WM Technology	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Tucows	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

In the previous week, Tucows had 5 more articles in the media than WM Technology. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Tucows and 1 mentions for WM Technology. Tucows' average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat WM Technology's score of 0.00 indicating that Tucows is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
WM Technology	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Tucows	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

WM Technology has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Tucows. Tucows is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than WM Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
WM Technology	$174.70M	0.37	$1.96M	$0.02	20.50
Tucows	$390.30M	0.37	-$75.82M	-$7.53	N/A

WM Technology has a net margin of 1.12% compared to Tucows' net margin of -21.20%. WM Technology's return on equity of 1.51% beat Tucows' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
WM Technology	1.12%	1.51%	1.04%
Tucows	-21.20%	N/A	-9.46%

22.0% of WM Technology shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.6% of Tucows shares are held by institutional investors. 19.7% of WM Technology shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.4% of Tucows shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

WM Technology has a beta of 0.87, indicating that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tucows has a beta of 0.88, indicating that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

WM Technology beats Tucows on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get WM Technology News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MAPS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

MAPS vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	WM Technology	IT Services Industry	Technology Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$65.21M	$11.21B	$29.79B	$12.94B
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.80%	2.73%	10.06%
P/E Ratio	20.51	14.62	75.19	24.87
Price / Sales	0.37	58.11	599.87	95.58
Price / Cash	3.31	43.55	50.51	37.42
Price / Book	0.49	8.55	8.21	6.44
Net Income	$1.96M	$268.51M	$677.77M	$347.05M
7 Day Performance	17.14%	1.84%	1.10%	1.00%
1 Month Performance	6.55%	0.99%	0.48%	-0.59%
1 Year Performance	-65.83%	36.33%	198.08%	22.26%

WM Technology Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
MAPS WM Technology	0.4171 of 5 stars	$0.41 flat	N/A	-56.0%	$65.21M	$174.70M	20.51	610
UIS Unisys	4.0153 of 5 stars	$2.98 -0.5%	$4.50 +51.3%	-23.6%	$216.89M	$1.95B	N/A	15,000	Gap Down
III Information Services Group	3.9148 of 5 stars	$4.38 +2.1%	$5.50 +25.6%	+16.7%	$209.54M	$244.73M	21.90	1,290	Earnings Report Dividend Announcement
SLNH Soluna	2.8306 of 5 stars	$1.21 -0.8%	$4.00 +230.6%	+159.2%	$190.88M	$29.72M	N/A	60	Upcoming Earnings
DAVA Endava	4.4622 of 5 stars	$3.10 +0.5%	$5.50 +77.7%	-75.6%	$173.97M	$999.23M	N/A	11,479	Gap Down

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:MAPS) was last updated on 8/11/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

WM Technology (MAPS) Competitors

MAPS vs. UIS, III, SLNH, DAVA, and TCX

How does WM Technology compare to Unisys?

Summary

How does WM Technology compare to Information Services Group?

Summary

How does WM Technology compare to Soluna?

Summary

How does WM Technology compare to Endava?

Summary

How does WM Technology compare to Tucows?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MAPS vs. The Competition

WM Technology Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

WM Technology (MAPS) Competitors

MAPS vs. UIS, III, SLNH, DAVA, and TCX

How does WM Technology compare to Unisys?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, UIS or MAPS?

Does the media refer more to UIS or MAPS?

Do analysts recommend UIS or MAPS?

Which has more risk and volatility, UIS or MAPS?

Is UIS or MAPS more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in UIS or MAPS?

Summary

How does WM Technology compare to Information Services Group?

Which has better earnings and valuation, MAPS or III?

Is MAPS or III more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, MAPS or III?

Does the media prefer MAPS or III?

Do analysts recommend MAPS or III?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in MAPS or III?

Summary

How does WM Technology compare to Soluna?

Does the media prefer MAPS or SLNH?

Which has more volatility and risk, MAPS or SLNH?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, MAPS or SLNH?

Do analysts prefer MAPS or SLNH?

Is MAPS or SLNH more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of MAPS or SLNH?

Summary

How does WM Technology compare to Endava?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of DAVA or MAPS?

Do analysts prefer DAVA or MAPS?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, DAVA or MAPS?

Is DAVA or MAPS more profitable?

Does the media refer more to DAVA or MAPS?

Which has more risk & volatility, DAVA or MAPS?

Summary

How does WM Technology compare to Tucows?

Do analysts rate MAPS or TCX?

Does the media favor MAPS or TCX?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, MAPS or TCX?

Is MAPS or TCX more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in MAPS or TCX?

Which has more risk & volatility, MAPS or TCX?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MAPS vs. The Competition

WM Technology Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools