Namib Minerals (NAMM) Competitors

$1.43 +0.06 (+4.38%)

Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$1.46 +0.04 (+2.45%)

As of 07:59 PM Eastern

NAMM vs. NVA, PLG, GORO, USGO, and AUST

Should you buy Namib Minerals stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Namib Minerals with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Namib Minerals include Nova Minerals (NVA), Platinum Group Metals (PLG), Gold Resource (GORO), U.S. GoldMining (USGO), and Austin Gold (AUST). These companies are all part of the "precious metals" industry.

How does Namib Minerals compare to Nova Minerals?

Namib Minerals (NASDAQ:NAMM) and Nova Minerals (NASDAQ:NVA) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk and institutional ownership.

Namib Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than Nova Minerals.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Namib Minerals	$82.60M	0.94	$101.18M	-$1.27	N/A
Nova Minerals	N/A	N/A	-$7.13M	N/A	N/A

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Namib Minerals	N/A	N/A	N/A
Nova Minerals	N/A	N/A	N/A

59.5% of Namib Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 30.5% of Namib Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Namib Minerals	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50
Nova Minerals	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

In the previous week, Nova Minerals had 4 more articles in the media than Namib Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Nova Minerals and 3 mentions for Namib Minerals. Namib Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat Nova Minerals' score of 0.24 indicating that Namib Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Namib Minerals	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Nova Minerals	1 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Namib Minerals beats Nova Minerals on 6 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Namib Minerals compare to Platinum Group Metals?

Platinum Group Metals (NYSE:PLG) and Namib Minerals (NASDAQ:NAMM) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

16.3% of Platinum Group Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.5% of Namib Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Platinum Group Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 30.5% of Namib Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Platinum Group Metals has a beta of 1.16, indicating that its stock price is 16% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Namib Minerals has a beta of 0.06, indicating that its stock price is 94% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Namib Minerals had 3 more articles in the media than Platinum Group Metals. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Namib Minerals and 0 mentions for Platinum Group Metals. Namib Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat Platinum Group Metals' score of 0.00 indicating that Namib Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Platinum Group Metals	Neutral
Namib Minerals	Positive

Namib Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than Platinum Group Metals. Platinum Group Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Namib Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Platinum Group Metals	N/A	N/A	-$4.61M	-$0.06	N/A
Namib Minerals	$82.60M	0.94	$101.18M	-$1.27	N/A

Namib Minerals' return on equity of 0.00% beat Platinum Group Metals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Platinum Group Metals	N/A	-10.13%	-9.69%
Namib Minerals	N/A	N/A	N/A

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Platinum Group Metals	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Namib Minerals	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50

Summary

Namib Minerals beats Platinum Group Metals on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Namib Minerals compare to Gold Resource?

Gold Resource (NYSE:GORO) and Namib Minerals (NASDAQ:NAMM) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Namib Minerals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Gold Resource's net margin of -61.31%. Namib Minerals' return on equity of 0.00% beat Gold Resource's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Gold Resource	-61.31%	-35.25%	-16.15%
Namib Minerals	N/A	N/A	N/A

Gold Resource has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Namib Minerals has a beta of 0.06, indicating that its stock price is 94% less volatile than the broader market.

18.4% of Gold Resource shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.5% of Namib Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.5% of Gold Resource shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 30.5% of Namib Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Namib Minerals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Gold Resource. Namib Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gold Resource, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Gold Resource	$131.35M	1.59	-$16.02M	$0.05	25.80
Namib Minerals	$82.60M	0.94	$101.18M	-$1.27	N/A

Gold Resource currently has a consensus price target of $1.75, indicating a potential upside of 35.66%. Given Gold Resource's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Gold Resource is more favorable than Namib Minerals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Gold Resource	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Namib Minerals	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50

In the previous week, Namib Minerals had 2 more articles in the media than Gold Resource. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Namib Minerals and 1 mentions for Gold Resource. Gold Resource's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Namib Minerals' score of 0.66 indicating that Gold Resource is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Gold Resource	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Namib Minerals	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Gold Resource and Namib Minerals tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Namib Minerals compare to U.S. GoldMining?

U.S. GoldMining (NASDAQ:USGO) and Namib Minerals (NASDAQ:NAMM) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, dividends, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

U.S. GoldMining currently has a consensus target price of $30.75, suggesting a potential upside of 196.24%. Given U.S. GoldMining's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe U.S. GoldMining is more favorable than Namib Minerals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
U.S. GoldMining	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Namib Minerals	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50

Namib Minerals' return on equity of 0.00% beat U.S. GoldMining's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
U.S. GoldMining	N/A	-143.06%	-123.69%
Namib Minerals	N/A	N/A	N/A

U.S. GoldMining has a beta of 1.97, meaning that its stock price is 97% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Namib Minerals has a beta of 0.06, meaning that its stock price is 94% less volatile than the broader market.

Namib Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than U.S. GoldMining. U.S. GoldMining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Namib Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
U.S. GoldMining	N/A	N/A	-$6.99M	-$0.58	N/A
Namib Minerals	$82.60M	0.94	$101.18M	-$1.27	N/A

In the previous week, Namib Minerals had 3 more articles in the media than U.S. GoldMining. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Namib Minerals and 0 mentions for U.S. GoldMining. Namib Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat U.S. GoldMining's score of 0.00 indicating that Namib Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
U.S. GoldMining	Neutral
Namib Minerals	Positive

0.5% of U.S. GoldMining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.5% of Namib Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.5% of U.S. GoldMining shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 30.5% of Namib Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Namib Minerals beats U.S. GoldMining on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Namib Minerals compare to Austin Gold?

Namib Minerals (NASDAQ:NAMM) and Austin Gold (NYSE:AUST) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership and valuation.

Namib Minerals has a beta of 0.06, suggesting that its share price is 94% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Austin Gold has a beta of 0.9, suggesting that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Namib Minerals	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50
Austin Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Namib Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than Austin Gold. Austin Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Namib Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Namib Minerals	$82.60M	0.94	$101.18M	-$1.27	N/A
Austin Gold	N/A	N/A	-$4M	-$0.12	N/A

59.5% of Namib Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.1% of Austin Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. 30.5% of Namib Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 70.7% of Austin Gold shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Namib Minerals' return on equity of 0.00% beat Austin Gold's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Namib Minerals	N/A	N/A	N/A
Austin Gold	N/A	-37.85%	-36.54%

In the previous week, Namib Minerals and Namib Minerals both had 3 articles in the media. Namib Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat Austin Gold's score of 0.35 indicating that Namib Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Namib Minerals	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Austin Gold	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Namib Minerals beats Austin Gold on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Namib Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding NAMM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

NAMM vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Namib Minerals	Gold & Silver Ores Industry	Materials Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$74.10M	$901.95M	$4.81B	$12.31B
Dividend Yield	N/A	1.17%	5.02%	5.32%
P/E Ratio	-1.13	2.58	22.92	25.65
Price / Sales	0.94	11.30	6,750.46	87.36
Price / Cash	0.68	15.01	27.21	56.72
Price / Book	-1.96	7.83	6.66	7.12
Net Income	$101.18M	$14.80M	$156.96M	$335.28M
7 Day Performance	-3.38%	-2.80%	-1.58%	2.66%
1 Month Performance	-33.49%	-11.10%	-1.98%	1.39%
1 Year Performance	N/A	55.60%	74.99%	35.43%

Namib Minerals Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
NAMM Namib Minerals	1.9083 of 5 stars	$1.43 +4.4%	N/A	N/A	$74.10M	$82.60M	N/A	N/A	News Coverage
NVA Nova Minerals	N/A	$5.89 +0.8%	N/A	N/A	$223.69M	N/A	N/A	N/A
PLG Platinum Group Metals	N/A	$1.66 -3.2%	N/A	+18.2%	$211.17M	N/A	N/A	10	Gap Down
GORO Gold Resource	2.5149 of 5 stars	$1.25 -5.0%	$1.75 +40.6%	+107.7%	$201.54M	$131.35M	N/A	10	News Coverage Positive News Gap Down
USGO U.S. GoldMining	1.5649 of 5 stars	$12.28 -2.9%	$30.75 +150.3%	+17.3%	$163.74M	N/A	N/A	6

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:NAMM) was last updated on 5/22/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Namib Minerals (NAMM) Competitors

NAMM vs. NVA, PLG, GORO, USGO, and AUST

How does Namib Minerals compare to Nova Minerals?

Summary

How does Namib Minerals compare to Platinum Group Metals?

Summary

How does Namib Minerals compare to Gold Resource?

Summary

How does Namib Minerals compare to U.S. GoldMining?

Summary

How does Namib Minerals compare to Austin Gold?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

NAMM vs. The Competition

Namib Minerals Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Namib Minerals (NAMM) Competitors

NAMM vs. NVA, PLG, GORO, USGO, and AUST

How does Namib Minerals compare to Nova Minerals?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, NAMM or NVA?

Is NAMM or NVA more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in NAMM or NVA?

Do analysts recommend NAMM or NVA?

Does the media prefer NAMM or NVA?

Summary

How does Namib Minerals compare to Platinum Group Metals?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in PLG or NAMM?

Which has more risk and volatility, PLG or NAMM?

Does the media refer more to PLG or NAMM?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, PLG or NAMM?

Is PLG or NAMM more profitable?

Do analysts recommend PLG or NAMM?

Summary

How does Namib Minerals compare to Gold Resource?

Is GORO or NAMM more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, GORO or NAMM?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in GORO or NAMM?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, GORO or NAMM?

Do analysts recommend GORO or NAMM?

Does the media refer more to GORO or NAMM?

Summary

How does Namib Minerals compare to U.S. GoldMining?

Do analysts recommend USGO or NAMM?

Is USGO or NAMM more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, USGO or NAMM?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, USGO or NAMM?

Does the media favor USGO or NAMM?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of USGO or NAMM?

Summary

How does Namib Minerals compare to Austin Gold?

Which has more volatility and risk, NAMM or AUST?

Do analysts rate NAMM or AUST?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, NAMM or AUST?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in NAMM or AUST?

Is NAMM or AUST more profitable?

Does the media prefer NAMM or AUST?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

NAMM vs. The Competition

Namib Minerals Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools