Go Pro

Namib Minerals (NAMM) Competitors

Namib Minerals logo
$1.62 +0.02 (+1.19%)
As of 12:56 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

NAMM vs. VOXR, GORO, NVA, PLG, and USGO

Should you buy Namib Minerals stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Namib Minerals with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Namib Minerals include Vox Royalty (VOXR), Gold Resource (GORO), Nova Minerals (NVA), Platinum Group Metals (PLG), and U.S. GoldMining (USGO). These companies are all part of the "precious metals" industry.

How does Namib Minerals compare to Vox Royalty?

Vox Royalty (NASDAQ:VOXR) and Namib Minerals (NASDAQ:NAMM) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Namib Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than Vox Royalty. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Namib Minerals and 0 mentions for Vox Royalty. Vox Royalty's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Namib Minerals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Vox Royalty Neutral
Namib Minerals Neutral

Namib Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than Vox Royalty. Namib Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vox Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Vox Royalty$16.62M18.49$5.89M$0.4210.54
Namib Minerals$82.60M1.06$101.18M-$0.96N/A

Vox Royalty currently has a consensus price target of $8.00, suggesting a potential upside of 80.79%. Given Vox Royalty's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Vox Royalty is more favorable than Namib Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Vox Royalty
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Namib Minerals
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50

Vox Royalty has a beta of 0.5, suggesting that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Namib Minerals has a beta of -0.07, suggesting that its stock price is 107% less volatile than the broader market.

46.0% of Vox Royalty shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.5% of Namib Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 30.5% of Namib Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Vox Royalty has a net margin of 190.73% compared to Namib Minerals' net margin of 0.00%. Vox Royalty's return on equity of 8.16% beat Namib Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Vox Royalty190.73% 8.16% 6.93%
Namib Minerals N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Vox Royalty beats Namib Minerals on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Namib Minerals compare to Gold Resource?

Gold Resource (NYSE:GORO) and Namib Minerals (NASDAQ:NAMM) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk and profitability.

Gold Resource presently has a consensus target price of $1.75, suggesting a potential downside of 31.75%. Given Gold Resource's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Gold Resource is more favorable than Namib Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gold Resource
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Namib Minerals
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50

18.4% of Gold Resource shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.5% of Namib Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Gold Resource shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 30.5% of Namib Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Gold Resource had 4 more articles in the media than Namib Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Gold Resource and 1 mentions for Namib Minerals. Gold Resource's average media sentiment score of 0.45 beat Namib Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that Gold Resource is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Gold Resource
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Namib Minerals
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Namib Minerals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Gold Resource's net margin of -61.31%. Namib Minerals' return on equity of 0.00% beat Gold Resource's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gold Resource-61.31% -35.25% -16.15%
Namib Minerals N/A N/A N/A

Namib Minerals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Gold Resource. Namib Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gold Resource, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gold Resource$131.35M3.16-$16.02M$0.0551.28
Namib Minerals$82.60M1.06$101.18M-$0.96N/A

Gold Resource has a beta of 1.02, suggesting that its share price is 2% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Namib Minerals has a beta of -0.07, suggesting that its share price is 107% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Gold Resource beats Namib Minerals on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Namib Minerals compare to Nova Minerals?

Namib Minerals (NASDAQ:NAMM) and Nova Minerals (NASDAQ:NVA) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk and dividends.

In the previous week, Namib Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than Nova Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Namib Minerals and 0 mentions for Nova Minerals. Namib Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Nova Minerals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Namib Minerals Neutral
Nova Minerals Neutral

59.5% of Namib Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 30.5% of Namib Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Namib Minerals
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
Nova Minerals
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Namib MineralsN/A N/A N/A
Nova Minerals N/A N/A N/A

Namib Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than Nova Minerals.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Namib Minerals$82.60M1.06$101.18M-$0.96N/A
Nova MineralsN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Summary

Namib Minerals beats Nova Minerals on 5 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Namib Minerals compare to Platinum Group Metals?

Namib Minerals (NASDAQ:NAMM) and Platinum Group Metals (NYSE:PLG) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, risk and profitability.

Namib Minerals' return on equity of 0.00% beat Platinum Group Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Namib MineralsN/A N/A N/A
Platinum Group Metals N/A -10.13%-9.69%

59.5% of Namib Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.3% of Platinum Group Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 30.5% of Namib Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Platinum Group Metals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Namib Minerals
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
Platinum Group Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, Namib Minerals and Namib Minerals both had 1 articles in the media. Platinum Group Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Namib Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that Platinum Group Metals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Namib Minerals
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Platinum Group Metals
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Namib Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than Platinum Group Metals. Platinum Group Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Namib Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Namib Minerals$82.60M1.06$101.18M-$0.96N/A
Platinum Group MetalsN/AN/A-$4.61M-$0.06N/A

Namib Minerals has a beta of -0.07, indicating that its share price is 107% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Platinum Group Metals has a beta of 1.19, indicating that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Namib Minerals beats Platinum Group Metals on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Namib Minerals compare to U.S. GoldMining?

Namib Minerals (NASDAQ:NAMM) and U.S. GoldMining (NASDAQ:USGO) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability and dividends.

In the previous week, Namib Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than U.S. GoldMining. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Namib Minerals and 0 mentions for U.S. GoldMining. Namib Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled U.S. GoldMining'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Namib Minerals Neutral
U.S. GoldMining Neutral

Namib Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than U.S. GoldMining. U.S. GoldMining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Namib Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Namib Minerals$82.60M1.06$101.18M-$0.96N/A
U.S. GoldMiningN/AN/A-$6.99M-$0.58N/A

Namib Minerals has a beta of -0.07, suggesting that its share price is 107% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, U.S. GoldMining has a beta of 1.84, suggesting that its share price is 84% more volatile than the broader market.

Namib Minerals' return on equity of 0.00% beat U.S. GoldMining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Namib MineralsN/A N/A N/A
U.S. GoldMining N/A -143.06%-123.69%

U.S. GoldMining has a consensus price target of $30.75, suggesting a potential upside of 281.47%. Given U.S. GoldMining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe U.S. GoldMining is more favorable than Namib Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Namib Minerals
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
U.S. GoldMining
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

59.5% of Namib Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of U.S. GoldMining shares are held by institutional investors. 30.5% of Namib Minerals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of U.S. GoldMining shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Namib Minerals beats U.S. GoldMining on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Namib Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for NAMM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding NAMM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

NAMM vs. The Competition

MetricNamib MineralsGold & Silver Ores IndustryMaterials SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$87.07M$950.52M$4.61B$12.41B
Dividend YieldN/A1.00%5.04%9.67%
P/E Ratio-1.6870.5121.2524.07
Price / Sales1.0611.895,740.2687.33
Price / Cash0.7013.1026.3659.37
Price / Book-2.228.348.686.20
Net Income$101.18M$16.79M$157.08M$331.71M
7 Day Performance12.43%9.86%1.08%-1.47%
1 Month Performance-11.04%1.43%-2.87%-2.03%
1 Year PerformanceN/A49.46%37.77%17.81%

Namib Minerals Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
NAMM
Namib Minerals
0.6473 of 5 stars
$1.62
+1.2%
N/AN/A$87.07M$82.60MN/AN/A
VOXR
Vox Royalty
3.7898 of 5 stars
$4.46
-2.3%
$8.00
+79.6%
+31.9%$306.27M$29.98M10.583
GORO
Gold Resource
0.5696 of 5 stars
$1.29
+0.4%
$1.75
+36.2%
+391.2%$208.03M$131.35MN/A10
NVA
Nova Minerals
N/A$4.54
+2.8%
N/AN/A$172.34MN/AN/AN/A
PLG
Platinum Group Metals
0.3063 of 5 stars
$1.28
-4.1%
N/A-26.4%$163.05MN/AN/A10

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:NAMM) was last updated on 7/22/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners