Do analysts prefer USAU or NAMM?

US Gold presently has a consensus target price of $26.75, suggesting a potential upside of 69.20%. Given US Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe US Gold is more favorable than Namib Minerals. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score US Gold 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.25 Namib Minerals 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50

Is USAU or NAMM more profitable?

Namib Minerals' return on equity of 0.00% beat US Gold's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets US Gold N/A -45.15% -42.91% Namib Minerals N/A N/A N/A

Do analysts prefer USGO or NAMM?

U.S. GoldMining currently has a consensus price target of $30.75, indicating a potential upside of 243.58%. Given U.S. GoldMining's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe U.S. GoldMining is more favorable than Namib Minerals. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score U.S. GoldMining 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Namib Minerals 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50

Is USGO or NAMM more profitable?

Namib Minerals' return on equity of 0.00% beat U.S. GoldMining's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets U.S. GoldMining N/A -165.60% -147.73% Namib Minerals N/A N/A N/A

Do analysts prefer NICM or NAMM?

Nicola Mining presently has a consensus price target of $12.00, indicating a potential upside of 84.05%. Given Nicola Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Nicola Mining is more favorable than Namib Minerals. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Nicola Mining 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 2 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.80 Namib Minerals 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50

Do analysts recommend AUST or NAMM?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Austin Gold 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Namib Minerals 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50

Is AUST or NAMM more profitable?

Namib Minerals' return on equity of 0.00% beat Austin Gold's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Austin Gold N/A -37.85% -36.54% Namib Minerals N/A N/A N/A

Do analysts recommend BGL or NAMM?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Blue Gold 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Namib Minerals 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50

Which has better earnings & valuation, BGL or NAMM?

Namib Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than Blue Gold. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Blue Gold N/A N/A -$21.91M N/A N/A Namib Minerals $82.60M 0.90 $101.18M -$0.96 N/A

Is BGL or NAMM more profitable?

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Blue Gold N/A N/A N/A Namib Minerals N/A N/A N/A

Namib Minerals (NAMM) Competitors

$1.38 -0.03 (-2.13%)

As of 04:00 PM Eastern

Compare

NAMM vs. USAU, USGO, NICM, AUST, and BGL

Should you buy Namib Minerals stock or one of its competitors? Namib Minerals's main competitors and comparable companies include US Gold (USAU), U.S. GoldMining (USGO), Nicola Mining (NICM), Austin Gold (AUST), and Blue Gold (BGL). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "gold" industry.

How does Namib Minerals compare to US Gold?

US Gold (NASDAQ:USAU) and Namib Minerals (NASDAQ:NAMM) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and dividends.

Namib Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than US Gold. US Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Namib Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
US Gold	N/A	N/A	-$17.21M	-$1.14	N/A
Namib Minerals	$82.60M	0.90	$101.18M	-$0.96	N/A

In the previous week, US Gold had 1 more articles in the media than Namib Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for US Gold and 1 mentions for Namib Minerals. Namib Minerals' average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat US Gold's score of 0.93 indicating that Namib Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
US Gold	Positive
Namib Minerals	Very Positive

US Gold has a beta of 0.9, meaning that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Namib Minerals has a beta of -0.03, meaning that its stock price is 103% less volatile than the broader market.

Namib Minerals' return on equity of 0.00% beat US Gold's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
US Gold	N/A	-45.15%	-42.91%
Namib Minerals	N/A	N/A	N/A

6.6% of US Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.5% of Namib Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.9% of US Gold shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 30.5% of Namib Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

US Gold presently has a consensus target price of $26.75, suggesting a potential upside of 69.20%. Given US Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe US Gold is more favorable than Namib Minerals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
US Gold	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
Namib Minerals	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50

Summary

Namib Minerals beats US Gold on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Namib Minerals compare to U.S. GoldMining?

U.S. GoldMining (NASDAQ:USGO) and Namib Minerals (NASDAQ:NAMM) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership and profitability.

In the previous week, U.S. GoldMining had 2 more articles in the media than Namib Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for U.S. GoldMining and 1 mentions for Namib Minerals. Namib Minerals' average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat U.S. GoldMining's score of 1.12 indicating that Namib Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
U.S. GoldMining	Positive
Namib Minerals	Very Positive

U.S. GoldMining currently has a consensus price target of $30.75, indicating a potential upside of 243.58%. Given U.S. GoldMining's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe U.S. GoldMining is more favorable than Namib Minerals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
U.S. GoldMining	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Namib Minerals	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50

U.S. GoldMining has a beta of 1.86, indicating that its share price is 86% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Namib Minerals has a beta of -0.03, indicating that its share price is 103% less volatile than the broader market.

Namib Minerals' return on equity of 0.00% beat U.S. GoldMining's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
U.S. GoldMining	N/A	-165.60%	-147.73%
Namib Minerals	N/A	N/A	N/A

Namib Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than U.S. GoldMining. U.S. GoldMining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Namib Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
U.S. GoldMining	N/A	N/A	-$6.99M	-$0.87	N/A
Namib Minerals	$82.60M	0.90	$101.18M	-$0.96	N/A

0.5% of U.S. GoldMining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.5% of Namib Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 3.7% of U.S. GoldMining shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 30.5% of Namib Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Namib Minerals beats U.S. GoldMining on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Namib Minerals compare to Nicola Mining?

Nicola Mining (NASDAQ:NICM) and Namib Minerals (NASDAQ:NAMM) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Nicola Mining had 1 more articles in the media than Namib Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Nicola Mining and 1 mentions for Namib Minerals. Namib Minerals' average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Nicola Mining's score of 0.96 indicating that Namib Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Nicola Mining	Positive
Namib Minerals	Very Positive

59.5% of Namib Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 30.5% of Namib Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Namib Minerals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Nicola Mining's net margin of -252.40%. Namib Minerals' return on equity of 0.00% beat Nicola Mining's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Nicola Mining	-252.40%	-11,567.20%	-60.48%
Namib Minerals	N/A	N/A	N/A

Nicola Mining presently has a consensus price target of $12.00, indicating a potential upside of 84.05%. Given Nicola Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Nicola Mining is more favorable than Namib Minerals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Nicola Mining	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80
Namib Minerals	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50

Namib Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than Nicola Mining. Nicola Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Namib Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Nicola Mining	$1.10M	113.39	-$3.95M	-$0.02	N/A
Namib Minerals	$82.60M	0.90	$101.18M	-$0.96	N/A

Summary

Namib Minerals beats Nicola Mining on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Namib Minerals compare to Austin Gold?

Austin Gold (NYSE:AUST) and Namib Minerals (NASDAQ:NAMM) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends and media sentiment.

Namib Minerals' return on equity of 0.00% beat Austin Gold's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Austin Gold	N/A	-37.85%	-36.54%
Namib Minerals	N/A	N/A	N/A

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Austin Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Namib Minerals	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50

Namib Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than Austin Gold. Austin Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Namib Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Austin Gold	N/A	N/A	-$4M	-$0.18	N/A
Namib Minerals	$82.60M	0.90	$101.18M	-$0.96	N/A

In the previous week, Namib Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than Austin Gold. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Namib Minerals and 0 mentions for Austin Gold. Namib Minerals' average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Austin Gold's score of 0.00 indicating that Namib Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Austin Gold	Neutral
Namib Minerals	Very Positive

Austin Gold has a beta of 0.94, suggesting that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Namib Minerals has a beta of -0.03, suggesting that its share price is 103% less volatile than the broader market.

62.1% of Austin Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.5% of Namib Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 70.7% of Austin Gold shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 30.5% of Namib Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Namib Minerals beats Austin Gold on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Namib Minerals compare to Blue Gold?

Blue Gold (NASDAQ:BGL) and Namib Minerals (NASDAQ:NAMM) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, profitability, dividends and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Blue Gold and Blue Gold both had 1 articles in the media. Blue Gold's average media sentiment score of 1.87 equaled Namib Minerals'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Blue Gold	Very Positive
Namib Minerals	Very Positive

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Blue Gold	N/A	N/A	N/A
Namib Minerals	N/A	N/A	N/A

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Blue Gold	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Namib Minerals	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50

24.6% of Blue Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.5% of Namib Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.9% of Blue Gold shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 30.5% of Namib Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Namib Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than Blue Gold.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Blue Gold	N/A	N/A	-$21.91M	N/A	N/A
Namib Minerals	$82.60M	0.90	$101.18M	-$0.96	N/A

Blue Gold has a beta of 3.47, indicating that its share price is 247% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Namib Minerals has a beta of -0.03, indicating that its share price is 103% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Namib Minerals beats Blue Gold on 5 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Namib Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding NAMM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

NAMM vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Namib Minerals	Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$76.26M	$4.08B	$5.11B	$12.89B
Dividend Yield	N/A	5.16%	4.67%	11.28%
P/E Ratio	-1.44	25.57	26.16	25.48
Price / Sales	0.90	7,483.41	4,448.04	92.57
Price / Cash	0.70	26.68	24.69	36.03
Price / Book	-1.89	10.69	8.99	6.34
Net Income	$101.18M	$125.14M	$156.32M	$349.45M
7 Day Performance	-11.54%	8.04%	5.97%	-0.10%
1 Month Performance	3.76%	24.50%	18.93%	4.36%
1 Year Performance	-51.06%	59.97%	46.70%	14.91%

Namib Minerals Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
NAMM Namib Minerals	1.2469 of 5 stars	$1.38 -2.1%	N/A	N/A	$76.26M	$82.60M	N/A	N/A	Positive News Gap Up
USAU US Gold	2.2144 of 5 stars	$16.12 -1.6%	$26.75 +66.0%	+21.5%	$266.43M	N/A	N/A	4
USGO U.S. GoldMining	2.7164 of 5 stars	$10.00 +3.8%	$30.75 +207.5%	-0.5%	$140.35M	N/A	N/A	6	Positive News High Trading Volume
NICM Nicola Mining	N/A	$6.56 -4.2%	$12.00 +82.9%	N/A	$125.49M	$1.10M	N/A	N/A	News Coverage Positive News Short Interest Decrease
AUST Austin Gold	N/A	$1.34 -0.7%	N/A	-25.2%	$18.35M	N/A	N/A	N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:NAMM) was last updated on 8/31/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Namib Minerals (NAMM) Competitors

NAMM vs. USAU, USGO, NICM, AUST, and BGL

How does Namib Minerals compare to US Gold?

Summary

How does Namib Minerals compare to U.S. GoldMining?

Summary

How does Namib Minerals compare to Nicola Mining?

Summary

How does Namib Minerals compare to Austin Gold?

Summary

How does Namib Minerals compare to Blue Gold?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

NAMM vs. The Competition

Namib Minerals Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Namib Minerals (NAMM) Competitors

NAMM vs. USAU, USGO, NICM, AUST, and BGL

How does Namib Minerals compare to US Gold?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, USAU or NAMM?

Does the media favor USAU or NAMM?

Which has more volatility & risk, USAU or NAMM?

Is USAU or NAMM more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in USAU or NAMM?

Do analysts prefer USAU or NAMM?

Summary

How does Namib Minerals compare to U.S. GoldMining?

Does the media prefer USGO or NAMM?

Do analysts prefer USGO or NAMM?

Which has more volatility and risk, USGO or NAMM?

Is USGO or NAMM more profitable?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, USGO or NAMM?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of USGO or NAMM?

Summary

How does Namib Minerals compare to Nicola Mining?

Does the media prefer NICM or NAMM?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in NICM or NAMM?

Is NICM or NAMM more profitable?

Do analysts prefer NICM or NAMM?

Which has better valuation and earnings, NICM or NAMM?

Summary

How does Namib Minerals compare to Austin Gold?

Is AUST or NAMM more profitable?

Do analysts recommend AUST or NAMM?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, AUST or NAMM?

Does the media prefer AUST or NAMM?

Which has more risk & volatility, AUST or NAMM?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of AUST or NAMM?

Summary

How does Namib Minerals compare to Blue Gold?

Does the media refer more to BGL or NAMM?

Is BGL or NAMM more profitable?

Do analysts recommend BGL or NAMM?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in BGL or NAMM?

Which has better earnings & valuation, BGL or NAMM?

Which has more volatility and risk, BGL or NAMM?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

NAMM vs. The Competition

Namib Minerals Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools