CO2 Energy Transition (NOEM) Competitors

Gladstone Land (NASDAQ:LAND) and CO2 Energy Transition (NASDAQ:NOEM) are both small-cap trading companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership and dividends.

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, LAND or NOEM?

Gladstone Land has higher revenue and earnings than CO2 Energy Transition.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Gladstone Land	$85.22M	4.13	$13.29M	-$0.25	-38.92
CO2 Energy Transition	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

Do analysts rate LAND or NOEM?

Gladstone Land currently has a consensus price target of $14.50, indicating a potential upside of 49.02%. Given Gladstone Land's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Gladstone Land is more favorable than CO2 Energy Transition.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Gladstone Land	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
CO2 Energy Transition	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Does the media favor LAND or NOEM?

In the previous week, Gladstone Land had 2 more articles in the media than CO2 Energy Transition. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Gladstone Land and 1 mentions for CO2 Energy Transition. CO2 Energy Transition's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Gladstone Land's score of 1.41 indicating that CO2 Energy Transition is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Gladstone Land	Positive
CO2 Energy Transition	Very Positive

Is LAND or NOEM more profitable?

Gladstone Land has a net margin of 18.14% compared to CO2 Energy Transition's net margin of 0.00%. Gladstone Land's return on equity of 2.14% beat CO2 Energy Transition's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Gladstone Land	18.14%	2.14%	1.13%
CO2 Energy Transition	N/A	N/A	N/A

Do institutionals & insiders believe in LAND or NOEM?

53.6% of Gladstone Land shares are held by institutional investors. 7.2% of Gladstone Land shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Gladstone Land beats CO2 Energy Transition on 10 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.