Do analysts prefer WHF or NOEM?

WhiteHorse Finance currently has a consensus price target of $7.25, suggesting a potential upside of 2.69%. Given WhiteHorse Finance's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe WhiteHorse Finance is more favorable than CO2 Energy Transition. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score WhiteHorse Finance 2 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50 CO2 Energy Transition 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Do analysts rate SITC or NOEM?

Site Centers currently has a consensus price target of $3.50, indicating a potential upside of 15.70%. Given Site Centers' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Site Centers is more favorable than CO2 Energy Transition. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Site Centers 2 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.33 CO2 Energy Transition 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Do analysts rate ELME or NOEM?

Elme Communities currently has a consensus price target of $18.00, suggesting a potential upside of 955.72%. Given Elme Communities' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Elme Communities is more favorable than CO2 Energy Transition. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Elme Communities 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.67 CO2 Energy Transition 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Do analysts rate NOEM or HCMA?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score CO2 Energy Transition 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 HCM Acquisition 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has higher earnings and valuation, NOEM or HCMA?

Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio CO2 Energy Transition N/A N/A $1.65M $0.15 70.73 HCM Acquisition N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Is NOEM or HCMA more profitable?

HCM Acquisition's return on equity of 0.00% beat CO2 Energy Transition's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets CO2 Energy Transition N/A -75.59% 2.02% HCM Acquisition N/A N/A N/A

Do analysts prefer NOEM or LAFA?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score CO2 Energy Transition 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Lafayette Acquisition 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has higher earnings and valuation, NOEM or LAFA?

Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio CO2 Energy Transition N/A N/A $1.65M $0.15 70.73 Lafayette Acquisition N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Is NOEM or LAFA more profitable?

Lafayette Acquisition's return on equity of 0.00% beat CO2 Energy Transition's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets CO2 Energy Transition N/A -75.59% 2.02% Lafayette Acquisition N/A N/A N/A

CO2 Energy Transition (NOEM) Competitors

$10.61 +0.03 (+0.28%)

Closing price 01:30 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$10.61 0.00 (0.00%)

As of 04:10 PM Eastern

Compare

NOEM vs. WHF, SITC, ELME, HCMA, and LAFA

Should you buy CO2 Energy Transition stock or one of its competitors? CO2 Energy Transition's main competitors and comparable companies include WhiteHorse Finance (WHF), Site Centers (SITC), Elme Communities (ELME), HCM Acquisition (HCMA), and Lafayette Acquisition (LAFA). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does CO2 Energy Transition compare to WhiteHorse Finance?

WhiteHorse Finance (NASDAQ:WHF) and CO2 Energy Transition (NASDAQ:NOEM) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, risk, valuation and earnings.

WhiteHorse Finance has higher revenue and earnings than CO2 Energy Transition. WhiteHorse Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CO2 Energy Transition, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
WhiteHorse Finance	$72.67M	2.09	$14.34M	$0.79	8.94
CO2 Energy Transition	N/A	N/A	$1.65M	$0.15	70.73

WhiteHorse Finance has a beta of 0.38, suggesting that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CO2 Energy Transition has a beta of -0.11, suggesting that its stock price is 111% less volatile than the broader market.

WhiteHorse Finance currently has a consensus price target of $7.25, suggesting a potential upside of 2.69%. Given WhiteHorse Finance's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe WhiteHorse Finance is more favorable than CO2 Energy Transition.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
WhiteHorse Finance	2 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50
CO2 Energy Transition	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

In the previous week, WhiteHorse Finance had 1 more articles in the media than CO2 Energy Transition. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for WhiteHorse Finance and 2 mentions for CO2 Energy Transition. WhiteHorse Finance's average media sentiment score of 0.56 beat CO2 Energy Transition's score of 0.00 indicating that WhiteHorse Finance is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
WhiteHorse Finance	Positive
CO2 Energy Transition	Neutral

13.2% of WhiteHorse Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.8% of WhiteHorse Finance shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

WhiteHorse Finance has a net margin of 26.88% compared to CO2 Energy Transition's net margin of 0.00%. WhiteHorse Finance's return on equity of 8.94% beat CO2 Energy Transition's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
WhiteHorse Finance	26.88%	8.94%	3.75%
CO2 Energy Transition	N/A	-75.59%	2.02%

Summary

WhiteHorse Finance beats CO2 Energy Transition on 13 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CO2 Energy Transition compare to Site Centers?

Site Centers (NYSE:SITC) and CO2 Energy Transition (NASDAQ:NOEM) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

Site Centers has higher revenue and earnings than CO2 Energy Transition. Site Centers is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CO2 Energy Transition, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Site Centers	$113.49M	1.40	$177.86M	$2.41	1.26
CO2 Energy Transition	N/A	N/A	$1.65M	$0.15	70.73

Site Centers has a net margin of 219.18% compared to CO2 Energy Transition's net margin of 0.00%. Site Centers' return on equity of 40.56% beat CO2 Energy Transition's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Site Centers	219.18%	40.56%	27.81%
CO2 Energy Transition	N/A	-75.59%	2.02%

Site Centers currently has a consensus price target of $3.50, indicating a potential upside of 15.70%. Given Site Centers' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Site Centers is more favorable than CO2 Energy Transition.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Site Centers	2 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.33
CO2 Energy Transition	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

88.7% of Site Centers shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Site Centers shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Site Centers has a beta of 0.98, meaning that its share price is 2% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CO2 Energy Transition has a beta of -0.11, meaning that its share price is 111% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, CO2 Energy Transition had 2 more articles in the media than Site Centers. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for CO2 Energy Transition and 0 mentions for Site Centers. Site Centers' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CO2 Energy Transition'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Site Centers	Neutral
CO2 Energy Transition	Neutral

Summary

Site Centers beats CO2 Energy Transition on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CO2 Energy Transition compare to Elme Communities?

Elme Communities (NYSE:ELME) and CO2 Energy Transition (NASDAQ:NOEM) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, media sentiment, valuation and earnings.

Elme Communities has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CO2 Energy Transition has a beta of -0.11, meaning that its stock price is 111% less volatile than the broader market.

CO2 Energy Transition has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Elme Communities. Elme Communities is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CO2 Energy Transition, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Elme Communities	$206.36M	0.73	-$154.16M	-$1.52	N/A
CO2 Energy Transition	N/A	N/A	$1.65M	$0.15	70.73

In the previous week, Elme Communities had 1 more articles in the media than CO2 Energy Transition. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Elme Communities and 2 mentions for CO2 Energy Transition. Elme Communities' average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat CO2 Energy Transition's score of 0.00 indicating that Elme Communities is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Elme Communities	Positive
CO2 Energy Transition	Neutral

Elme Communities currently has a consensus price target of $18.00, suggesting a potential upside of 955.72%. Given Elme Communities' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Elme Communities is more favorable than CO2 Energy Transition.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Elme Communities	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.67
CO2 Energy Transition	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

CO2 Energy Transition has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Elme Communities' net margin of -74.71%. Elme Communities' return on equity of -20.43% beat CO2 Energy Transition's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Elme Communities	-74.71%	-20.43%	-8.29%
CO2 Energy Transition	N/A	-75.59%	2.02%

87.9% of Elme Communities shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of Elme Communities shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Elme Communities beats CO2 Energy Transition on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CO2 Energy Transition compare to HCM Acquisition?

CO2 Energy Transition (NASDAQ:NOEM) and HCM Acquisition (NASDAQ:HCMA) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability and earnings.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
CO2 Energy Transition	N/A	N/A	$1.65M	$0.15	70.73
HCM Acquisition	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

In the previous week, CO2 Energy Transition had 1 more articles in the media than HCM Acquisition. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for CO2 Energy Transition and 1 mentions for HCM Acquisition. CO2 Energy Transition's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled HCM Acquisition'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
CO2 Energy Transition	Neutral
HCM Acquisition	Neutral

CO2 Energy Transition has a beta of -0.11, indicating that its stock price is 111% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HCM Acquisition has a beta of -0.27, indicating that its stock price is 127% less volatile than the broader market.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
CO2 Energy Transition	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
HCM Acquisition	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

11.8% of HCM Acquisition shares are owned by institutional investors. 71.2% of HCM Acquisition shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

HCM Acquisition's return on equity of 0.00% beat CO2 Energy Transition's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
CO2 Energy Transition	N/A	-75.59%	2.02%
HCM Acquisition	N/A	N/A	N/A

Summary

CO2 Energy Transition and HCM Acquisition tied by winning 3 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CO2 Energy Transition compare to Lafayette Acquisition?

CO2 Energy Transition (NASDAQ:NOEM) and Lafayette Acquisition (NASDAQ:LAFA) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, valuation and profitability.

In the previous week, CO2 Energy Transition and CO2 Energy Transition both had 2 articles in the media. CO2 Energy Transition's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Lafayette Acquisition'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
CO2 Energy Transition	Neutral
Lafayette Acquisition	Neutral

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
CO2 Energy Transition	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Lafayette Acquisition	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Lafayette Acquisition's return on equity of 0.00% beat CO2 Energy Transition's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
CO2 Energy Transition	N/A	-75.59%	2.02%
Lafayette Acquisition	N/A	N/A	N/A

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
CO2 Energy Transition	N/A	N/A	$1.65M	$0.15	70.73
Lafayette Acquisition	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

Summary

CO2 Energy Transition and Lafayette Acquisition tied by winning 1 of the 2 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get CO2 Energy Transition News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding NOEM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

NOEM vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	CO2 Energy Transition	Capital Markets Industry	Finance Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$39.32M	$5.31B	$13.70B	$13.29B
Dividend Yield	N/A	7.49%	5.96%	12.57%
P/E Ratio	70.74	27.44	23.17	21.27
Price / Sales	N/A	1,258.00	516.62	87.10
Price / Cash	61.39	47.87	46.12	52.76
Price / Book	-55.84	3.50	2.70	6.34
Net Income	$1.65M	$417.39M	$1.32B	$360.00M
7 Day Performance	-0.09%	-0.13%	-0.68%	-0.11%
1 Month Performance	-1.90%	-1.85%	-1.81%	-3.42%
1 Year Performance	4.02%	4.37%	8.62%	5.46%

CO2 Energy Transition Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
NOEM CO2 Energy Transition	0.4851 of 5 stars	$10.61 +0.3%	N/A	+4.0%	$39.32M	N/A	70.74	N/A	Short Interest Decrease
WHF WhiteHorse Finance	2.5981 of 5 stars	$7.34 -1.5%	$7.25 -1.2%	-6.8%	$157.56M	$72.67M	9.28	3	News Coverage Ex-Dividend
SITC Site Centers	1.5562 of 5 stars	$2.92 -0.5%	$3.50 +20.1%	-65.9%	$152.97M	$71.27M	1.21	155	Analyst Forecast
ELME Elme Communities	2.1541 of 5 stars	$1.66 +0.3%	$18.00 +987.6%	-89.8%	$147.06M	$246.96M	N/A	91
HCMA HCM Acquisition	0.8221 of 5 stars	$10.30 -0.2%	N/A	+2.0%	$145.66M	N/A	N/A	N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:NOEM) was last updated on 9/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

CO2 Energy Transition (NOEM) Competitors

NOEM vs. WHF, SITC, ELME, HCMA, and LAFA

How does CO2 Energy Transition compare to WhiteHorse Finance?

Summary

How does CO2 Energy Transition compare to Site Centers?

Summary

How does CO2 Energy Transition compare to Elme Communities?

Summary

How does CO2 Energy Transition compare to HCM Acquisition?

Summary

How does CO2 Energy Transition compare to Lafayette Acquisition?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

NOEM vs. The Competition

CO2 Energy Transition Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

CO2 Energy Transition (NOEM) Competitors

NOEM vs. WHF, SITC, ELME, HCMA, and LAFA

How does CO2 Energy Transition compare to WhiteHorse Finance?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, WHF or NOEM?

Which has more volatility & risk, WHF or NOEM?

Do analysts prefer WHF or NOEM?

Does the media refer more to WHF or NOEM?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in WHF or NOEM?

Is WHF or NOEM more profitable?

Summary

How does CO2 Energy Transition compare to Site Centers?

Which has better earnings and valuation, SITC or NOEM?

Is SITC or NOEM more profitable?

Do analysts rate SITC or NOEM?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of SITC or NOEM?

Which has more volatility & risk, SITC or NOEM?

Does the media prefer SITC or NOEM?

Summary

How does CO2 Energy Transition compare to Elme Communities?

Which has more volatility and risk, ELME or NOEM?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, ELME or NOEM?

Does the media prefer ELME or NOEM?

Do analysts rate ELME or NOEM?

Is ELME or NOEM more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in ELME or NOEM?

Summary

How does CO2 Energy Transition compare to HCM Acquisition?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, NOEM or HCMA?

Does the media refer more to NOEM or HCMA?

Which has more risk & volatility, NOEM or HCMA?

Do analysts rate NOEM or HCMA?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in NOEM or HCMA?

Is NOEM or HCMA more profitable?

Summary

How does CO2 Energy Transition compare to Lafayette Acquisition?

Does the media prefer NOEM or LAFA?

Do analysts prefer NOEM or LAFA?

Is NOEM or LAFA more profitable?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, NOEM or LAFA?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

NOEM vs. The Competition

CO2 Energy Transition Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools