Do analysts rate NOEM or SITC?

Site Centers has a consensus target price of $6.75, indicating a potential upside of 129.20%. Given Site Centers' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Site Centers is more favorable than CO2 Energy Transition. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score CO2 Energy Transition 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Site Centers 2 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50

Do analysts prefer NOEM or WHF?

WhiteHorse Finance has a consensus target price of $7.25, indicating a potential upside of 2.55%. Given WhiteHorse Finance's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe WhiteHorse Finance is more favorable than CO2 Energy Transition. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score CO2 Energy Transition 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 WhiteHorse Finance 2 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50

Do analysts rate NOEM or ELME?

Elme Communities has a consensus price target of $18.00, suggesting a potential upside of 968.25%. Given Elme Communities' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Elme Communities is more favorable than CO2 Energy Transition. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score CO2 Energy Transition 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Elme Communities 1 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.75

Do analysts rate HCMA or NOEM?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score HCM Acquisition 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 CO2 Energy Transition 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, HCMA or NOEM?

Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio HCM Acquisition N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A CO2 Energy Transition N/A N/A $1.65M $0.15 70.93

Is HCMA or NOEM more profitable?

HCM Acquisition's return on equity of 0.00% beat CO2 Energy Transition's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets HCM Acquisition N/A N/A N/A CO2 Energy Transition N/A -75.59% 2.02%

Do analysts prefer NOEM or LAFA?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score CO2 Energy Transition 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Lafayette Acquisition 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has better earnings and valuation, NOEM or LAFA?

Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio CO2 Energy Transition N/A N/A $1.65M $0.15 70.93 Lafayette Acquisition N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Is NOEM or LAFA more profitable?

Lafayette Acquisition's return on equity of 0.00% beat CO2 Energy Transition's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets CO2 Energy Transition N/A -75.59% 2.02% Lafayette Acquisition N/A N/A N/A

CO2 Energy Transition (NOEM) Competitors

$10.64 -0.05 (-0.47%)

Closing price 09/2/2026

Extended Trading

$10.62 -0.02 (-0.14%)

As of 04:10 PM Eastern

Compare

NOEM vs. SITC, WHF, ELME, HCMA, and LAFA

Should you buy CO2 Energy Transition stock or one of its competitors? CO2 Energy Transition's main competitors and comparable companies include Site Centers (SITC), WhiteHorse Finance (WHF), Elme Communities (ELME), HCM Acquisition (HCMA), and Lafayette Acquisition (LAFA). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does CO2 Energy Transition compare to Site Centers?

CO2 Energy Transition (NASDAQ:NOEM) and Site Centers (NYSE:SITC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, risk, dividends, earnings and institutional ownership.

Site Centers has higher revenue and earnings than CO2 Energy Transition. Site Centers is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CO2 Energy Transition, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
CO2 Energy Transition	N/A	N/A	$1.65M	$0.15	70.93
Site Centers	$113.49M	1.36	$177.86M	$2.41	1.22

Site Centers has a consensus target price of $6.75, indicating a potential upside of 129.20%. Given Site Centers' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Site Centers is more favorable than CO2 Energy Transition.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
CO2 Energy Transition	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Site Centers	2 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50

88.7% of Site Centers shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Site Centers shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

CO2 Energy Transition has a beta of -0.11, indicating that its share price is 111% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Site Centers has a beta of 0.98, indicating that its share price is 2% less volatile than the broader market.

Site Centers has a net margin of 219.18% compared to CO2 Energy Transition's net margin of 0.00%. Site Centers' return on equity of 40.56% beat CO2 Energy Transition's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
CO2 Energy Transition	N/A	-75.59%	2.02%
Site Centers	219.18%	40.56%	27.81%

In the previous week, Site Centers had 1 more articles in the media than CO2 Energy Transition. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Site Centers and 0 mentions for CO2 Energy Transition. Site Centers' average media sentiment score of 1.84 beat CO2 Energy Transition's score of 0.00 indicating that Site Centers is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
CO2 Energy Transition	Neutral
Site Centers	Very Positive

Summary

Site Centers beats CO2 Energy Transition on 13 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CO2 Energy Transition compare to WhiteHorse Finance?

CO2 Energy Transition (NASDAQ:NOEM) and WhiteHorse Finance (NASDAQ:WHF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, valuation and profitability.

13.2% of WhiteHorse Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.8% of WhiteHorse Finance shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

WhiteHorse Finance has higher revenue and earnings than CO2 Energy Transition. WhiteHorse Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CO2 Energy Transition, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
CO2 Energy Transition	N/A	N/A	$1.65M	$0.15	70.93
WhiteHorse Finance	$72.67M	2.09	$14.34M	$0.79	8.95

WhiteHorse Finance has a consensus target price of $7.25, indicating a potential upside of 2.55%. Given WhiteHorse Finance's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe WhiteHorse Finance is more favorable than CO2 Energy Transition.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
CO2 Energy Transition	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
WhiteHorse Finance	2 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50

WhiteHorse Finance has a net margin of 26.88% compared to CO2 Energy Transition's net margin of 0.00%. WhiteHorse Finance's return on equity of 8.94% beat CO2 Energy Transition's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
CO2 Energy Transition	N/A	-75.59%	2.02%
WhiteHorse Finance	26.88%	8.94%	3.75%

CO2 Energy Transition has a beta of -0.11, suggesting that its stock price is 111% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, WhiteHorse Finance has a beta of 0.38, suggesting that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, CO2 Energy Transition's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled WhiteHorse Finance'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
CO2 Energy Transition	Neutral
WhiteHorse Finance	Neutral

Summary

WhiteHorse Finance beats CO2 Energy Transition on 11 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CO2 Energy Transition compare to Elme Communities?

CO2 Energy Transition (NASDAQ:NOEM) and Elme Communities (NYSE:ELME) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

Elme Communities has a consensus price target of $18.00, suggesting a potential upside of 968.25%. Given Elme Communities' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Elme Communities is more favorable than CO2 Energy Transition.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
CO2 Energy Transition	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Elme Communities	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.75

CO2 Energy Transition has a beta of -0.11, meaning that its share price is 111% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Elme Communities has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

CO2 Energy Transition has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Elme Communities. Elme Communities is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CO2 Energy Transition, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
CO2 Energy Transition	N/A	N/A	$1.65M	$0.15	70.93
Elme Communities	$206.36M	0.73	-$154.16M	-$1.52	N/A

CO2 Energy Transition has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Elme Communities' net margin of -74.71%. Elme Communities' return on equity of -20.43% beat CO2 Energy Transition's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
CO2 Energy Transition	N/A	-75.59%	2.02%
Elme Communities	-74.71%	-20.43%	-8.29%

In the previous week, Elme Communities had 1 more articles in the media than CO2 Energy Transition. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Elme Communities and 0 mentions for CO2 Energy Transition. Elme Communities' average media sentiment score of 1.76 beat CO2 Energy Transition's score of 0.00 indicating that Elme Communities is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
CO2 Energy Transition	Neutral
Elme Communities	Very Positive

87.9% of Elme Communities shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of Elme Communities shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Elme Communities beats CO2 Energy Transition on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CO2 Energy Transition compare to HCM Acquisition?

HCM Acquisition (NASDAQ:HCMA) and CO2 Energy Transition (NASDAQ:NOEM) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

HCM Acquisition has a beta of -0.27, suggesting that its stock price is 127% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CO2 Energy Transition has a beta of -0.11, suggesting that its stock price is 111% less volatile than the broader market.

HCM Acquisition's return on equity of 0.00% beat CO2 Energy Transition's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
HCM Acquisition	N/A	N/A	N/A
CO2 Energy Transition	N/A	-75.59%	2.02%

11.8% of HCM Acquisition shares are owned by institutional investors. 71.2% of HCM Acquisition shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, HCM Acquisition's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CO2 Energy Transition'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
HCM Acquisition	Neutral
CO2 Energy Transition	Neutral

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
HCM Acquisition	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
CO2 Energy Transition	N/A	N/A	$1.65M	$0.15	70.93

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
HCM Acquisition	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
CO2 Energy Transition	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Summary

HCM Acquisition beats CO2 Energy Transition on 3 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CO2 Energy Transition compare to Lafayette Acquisition?

CO2 Energy Transition (NASDAQ:NOEM) and Lafayette Acquisition (NASDAQ:LAFA) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, risk and valuation.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
CO2 Energy Transition	N/A	N/A	$1.65M	$0.15	70.93
Lafayette Acquisition	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
CO2 Energy Transition	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Lafayette Acquisition	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Lafayette Acquisition's return on equity of 0.00% beat CO2 Energy Transition's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
CO2 Energy Transition	N/A	-75.59%	2.02%
Lafayette Acquisition	N/A	N/A	N/A

In the previous week, CO2 Energy Transition's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Lafayette Acquisition'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
CO2 Energy Transition	Neutral
Lafayette Acquisition	Neutral

Summary

CO2 Energy Transition and Lafayette Acquisition tied by winning 1 of the 2 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get CO2 Energy Transition News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding NOEM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

NOEM vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	CO2 Energy Transition	Capital Markets Industry	Finance Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$39.73M	$5.57B	$13.96B	$12.67B
Dividend Yield	N/A	7.38%	5.90%	8.56%
P/E Ratio	70.94	31.39	25.99	25.27
Price / Sales	N/A	1,296.54	530.57	93.73
Price / Cash	62.03	48.04	37.95	52.08
Price / Book	-16.89	1.95	2.11	6.10
Net Income	$1.65M	$418.14M	$1.32B	$348.86M
7 Day Performance	-1.64%	-0.74%	-0.45%	-1.69%
1 Month Performance	-9.83%	1.75%	2.24%	3.57%
1 Year Performance	4.83%	7.04%	11.79%	15.00%

CO2 Energy Transition Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
NOEM CO2 Energy Transition	N/A	$10.64 -0.5%	N/A	+4.8%	$39.73M	N/A	70.94	N/A
SITC Site Centers	3.3707 of 5 stars	$3.02 +1.3%	$6.75 +123.5%	-76.3%	$158.46M	$113.49M	1.25	270	Positive News
WHF WhiteHorse Finance	2.872 of 5 stars	$7.12 -0.1%	$7.25 +1.8%	-17.9%	$152.91M	$23.04M	9.01	N/A
ELME Elme Communities	2.6482 of 5 stars	$1.67 flat	$18.00 +977.8%	-90.1%	$148.40M	$206.36M	N/A	100	Positive News
HCMA HCM Acquisition	N/A	$10.29 flat	N/A	+89.3%	$145.52M	N/A	N/A	N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:NOEM) was last updated on 9/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

CO2 Energy Transition (NOEM) Competitors

NOEM vs. SITC, WHF, ELME, HCMA, and LAFA

How does CO2 Energy Transition compare to Site Centers?

Summary

How does CO2 Energy Transition compare to WhiteHorse Finance?

Summary

How does CO2 Energy Transition compare to Elme Communities?

Summary

How does CO2 Energy Transition compare to HCM Acquisition?

Summary

How does CO2 Energy Transition compare to Lafayette Acquisition?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

NOEM vs. The Competition

CO2 Energy Transition Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

CO2 Energy Transition (NOEM) Competitors

NOEM vs. SITC, WHF, ELME, HCMA, and LAFA

How does CO2 Energy Transition compare to Site Centers?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, NOEM or SITC?

Do analysts rate NOEM or SITC?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of NOEM or SITC?

Which has more volatility & risk, NOEM or SITC?

Is NOEM or SITC more profitable?

Does the media prefer NOEM or SITC?

Summary

How does CO2 Energy Transition compare to WhiteHorse Finance?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in NOEM or WHF?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, NOEM or WHF?

Do analysts prefer NOEM or WHF?

Is NOEM or WHF more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, NOEM or WHF?

Does the media prefer NOEM or WHF?

Summary

How does CO2 Energy Transition compare to Elme Communities?

Do analysts rate NOEM or ELME?

Which has more risk & volatility, NOEM or ELME?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, NOEM or ELME?

Is NOEM or ELME more profitable?

Does the media refer more to NOEM or ELME?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of NOEM or ELME?

Summary

How does CO2 Energy Transition compare to HCM Acquisition?

Which has more volatility & risk, HCMA or NOEM?

Is HCMA or NOEM more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in HCMA or NOEM?

Does the media favor HCMA or NOEM?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, HCMA or NOEM?

Do analysts rate HCMA or NOEM?

Summary

How does CO2 Energy Transition compare to Lafayette Acquisition?

Which has better earnings and valuation, NOEM or LAFA?

Do analysts prefer NOEM or LAFA?

Is NOEM or LAFA more profitable?

Does the media favor NOEM or LAFA?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

NOEM vs. The Competition

CO2 Energy Transition Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools