Do analysts prefer NOEM or ELME?

Elme Communities has a consensus target price of $18.00, indicating a potential upside of 925.64%. Given Elme Communities' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Elme Communities is more favorable than CO2 Energy Transition. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score CO2 Energy Transition 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Elme Communities 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.67

Is NOEM or ELME more profitable?

Elme Communities' return on equity of 0.00% beat CO2 Energy Transition's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets CO2 Energy Transition N/A -75.59% 2.02% Elme Communities N/A N/A N/A

Do analysts prefer BANX or NOEM?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score ArrowMark Financial 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 CO2 Energy Transition 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has better earnings & valuation, BANX or NOEM?

Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio ArrowMark Financial N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A CO2 Energy Transition N/A N/A $1.65M $0.15 70.37

Is BANX or NOEM more profitable?

ArrowMark Financial's return on equity of 0.00% beat CO2 Energy Transition's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets ArrowMark Financial N/A N/A N/A CO2 Energy Transition N/A -75.59% 2.02%

Do analysts prefer WHF or NOEM?

WhiteHorse Finance currently has a consensus price target of $7.25, suggesting a potential downside of 2.03%. Given WhiteHorse Finance's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe WhiteHorse Finance is more favorable than CO2 Energy Transition. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score WhiteHorse Finance 2 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50 CO2 Energy Transition 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Do analysts prefer HCMA or NOEM?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score HCM Acquisition 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 CO2 Energy Transition 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, HCMA or NOEM?

Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio HCM Acquisition N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A CO2 Energy Transition N/A N/A $1.65M $0.15 70.37

Is HCMA or NOEM more profitable?

HCM Acquisition's return on equity of 0.00% beat CO2 Energy Transition's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets HCM Acquisition N/A N/A N/A CO2 Energy Transition N/A -75.59% 2.02%

Do analysts rate LAFA or NOEM?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Lafayette Acquisition 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 CO2 Energy Transition 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has higher earnings & valuation, LAFA or NOEM?

Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Lafayette Acquisition N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A CO2 Energy Transition N/A N/A $1.65M $0.15 70.37

Is LAFA or NOEM more profitable?

Lafayette Acquisition's return on equity of 0.00% beat CO2 Energy Transition's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Lafayette Acquisition N/A N/A N/A CO2 Energy Transition N/A -75.59% 2.02%

CO2 Energy Transition (NOEM) Competitors

$10.56 -0.08 (-0.79%)

Closing price 10/14/2026 03:39 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$10.52 -0.04 (-0.39%)

As of 10/14/2026 04:01 PM Eastern

Compare

NOEM vs. ELME, BANX, WHF, HCMA, and LAFA

Should you buy CO2 Energy Transition stock or one of its competitors? CO2 Energy Transition's main competitors and comparable companies include Elme Communities (ELME), ArrowMark Financial (BANX), WhiteHorse Finance (WHF), HCM Acquisition (HCMA), and Lafayette Acquisition (LAFA). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does CO2 Energy Transition compare to Elme Communities?

CO2 Energy Transition (NASDAQ:NOEM) and Elme Communities (NYSE:ELME) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Elme Communities' return on equity of 0.00% beat CO2 Energy Transition's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
CO2 Energy Transition	N/A	-75.59%	2.02%
Elme Communities	N/A	N/A	N/A

CO2 Energy Transition has a beta of -0.1, meaning that its share price is 110% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Elme Communities has a beta of 0.73, meaning that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

Elme Communities has a consensus target price of $18.00, indicating a potential upside of 925.64%. Given Elme Communities' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Elme Communities is more favorable than CO2 Energy Transition.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
CO2 Energy Transition	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Elme Communities	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.67

CO2 Energy Transition has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Elme Communities. Elme Communities is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CO2 Energy Transition, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
CO2 Energy Transition	N/A	N/A	$1.65M	$0.15	70.37
Elme Communities	$206.36M	0.76	-$154.16M	-$1.52	N/A

In the previous week, CO2 Energy Transition had 1 more articles in the media than Elme Communities. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for CO2 Energy Transition and 0 mentions for Elme Communities. CO2 Energy Transition's average media sentiment score of 1.83 beat Elme Communities' score of 0.00 indicating that CO2 Energy Transition is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
CO2 Energy Transition	Very Positive
Elme Communities	Neutral

87.9% of Elme Communities shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of Elme Communities shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Elme Communities beats CO2 Energy Transition on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CO2 Energy Transition compare to ArrowMark Financial?

ArrowMark Financial (NASDAQ:BANX) and CO2 Energy Transition (NASDAQ:NOEM) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
ArrowMark Financial	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
CO2 Energy Transition	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

ArrowMark Financial's return on equity of 0.00% beat CO2 Energy Transition's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
ArrowMark Financial	N/A	N/A	N/A
CO2 Energy Transition	N/A	-75.59%	2.02%

ArrowMark Financial has a beta of 0.25, suggesting that its share price is 75% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CO2 Energy Transition has a beta of -0.1, suggesting that its share price is 110% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, ArrowMark Financial had 5 more articles in the media than CO2 Energy Transition. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for ArrowMark Financial and 1 mentions for CO2 Energy Transition. CO2 Energy Transition's average media sentiment score of 1.83 beat ArrowMark Financial's score of 1.26 indicating that CO2 Energy Transition is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
ArrowMark Financial	Positive
CO2 Energy Transition	Very Positive

24.9% of ArrowMark Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of ArrowMark Financial shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
ArrowMark Financial	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
CO2 Energy Transition	N/A	N/A	$1.65M	$0.15	70.37

Summary

ArrowMark Financial beats CO2 Energy Transition on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CO2 Energy Transition compare to WhiteHorse Finance?

WhiteHorse Finance (NASDAQ:WHF) and CO2 Energy Transition (NASDAQ:NOEM) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership and risk.

WhiteHorse Finance has a net margin of 26.88% compared to CO2 Energy Transition's net margin of 0.00%. WhiteHorse Finance's return on equity of 8.94% beat CO2 Energy Transition's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
WhiteHorse Finance	26.88%	8.94%	3.75%
CO2 Energy Transition	N/A	-75.59%	2.02%

WhiteHorse Finance has higher revenue and earnings than CO2 Energy Transition. WhiteHorse Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CO2 Energy Transition, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
WhiteHorse Finance	$72.67M	2.19	$14.34M	$0.79	9.37
CO2 Energy Transition	N/A	N/A	$1.65M	$0.15	70.37

13.2% of WhiteHorse Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.8% of WhiteHorse Finance shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

WhiteHorse Finance currently has a consensus price target of $7.25, suggesting a potential downside of 2.03%. Given WhiteHorse Finance's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe WhiteHorse Finance is more favorable than CO2 Energy Transition.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
WhiteHorse Finance	2 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50
CO2 Energy Transition	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

In the previous week, WhiteHorse Finance had 6 more articles in the media than CO2 Energy Transition. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for WhiteHorse Finance and 1 mentions for CO2 Energy Transition. CO2 Energy Transition's average media sentiment score of 1.83 beat WhiteHorse Finance's score of 0.64 indicating that CO2 Energy Transition is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
WhiteHorse Finance	Positive
CO2 Energy Transition	Very Positive

WhiteHorse Finance has a beta of 0.39, meaning that its stock price is 61% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CO2 Energy Transition has a beta of -0.1, meaning that its stock price is 110% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

WhiteHorse Finance beats CO2 Energy Transition on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CO2 Energy Transition compare to HCM Acquisition?

HCM Acquisition (NASDAQ:HCMA) and CO2 Energy Transition (NASDAQ:NOEM) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, valuation, risk and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, HCM Acquisition and HCM Acquisition both had 1 articles in the media. CO2 Energy Transition's average media sentiment score of 1.83 beat HCM Acquisition's score of 1.82 indicating that CO2 Energy Transition is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
HCM Acquisition	Very Positive
CO2 Energy Transition	Very Positive

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
HCM Acquisition	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
CO2 Energy Transition	N/A	N/A	$1.65M	$0.15	70.37

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
HCM Acquisition	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
CO2 Energy Transition	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

11.8% of HCM Acquisition shares are held by institutional investors. 71.2% of HCM Acquisition shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

HCM Acquisition's return on equity of 0.00% beat CO2 Energy Transition's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
HCM Acquisition	N/A	N/A	N/A
CO2 Energy Transition	N/A	-75.59%	2.02%

HCM Acquisition has a beta of -0.27, indicating that its stock price is 127% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CO2 Energy Transition has a beta of -0.1, indicating that its stock price is 110% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

HCM Acquisition and CO2 Energy Transition tied by winning 3 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CO2 Energy Transition compare to Lafayette Acquisition?

Lafayette Acquisition (NASDAQ:LAFA) and CO2 Energy Transition (NASDAQ:NOEM) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Lafayette Acquisition and Lafayette Acquisition both had 1 articles in the media. CO2 Energy Transition's average media sentiment score of 1.83 beat Lafayette Acquisition's score of 1.79 indicating that CO2 Energy Transition is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Lafayette Acquisition	Very Positive
CO2 Energy Transition	Very Positive

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Lafayette Acquisition	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
CO2 Energy Transition	N/A	N/A	$1.65M	$0.15	70.37

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Lafayette Acquisition	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
CO2 Energy Transition	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Lafayette Acquisition's return on equity of 0.00% beat CO2 Energy Transition's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Lafayette Acquisition	N/A	N/A	N/A
CO2 Energy Transition	N/A	-75.59%	2.02%

Summary

CO2 Energy Transition beats Lafayette Acquisition on 2 of the 3 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get CO2 Energy Transition News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding NOEM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

NOEM vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	CO2 Energy Transition	Capital Markets Industry	Finance Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$39.54M	$5.16B	$13.61B	$13.18B
Dividend Yield	N/A	7.62%	6.09%	19.59%
P/E Ratio	70.38	28.14	22.89	19.57
Price / Sales	N/A	1,121.83	473.65	81.29
Price / Cash	61.74	47.58	43.36	52.75
Price / Book	-55.56	3.44	2.68	5.92
Net Income	$1.65M	$415.07M	$1.32B	$380.90M
7 Day Performance	-0.22%	-0.76%	-0.86%	-3.90%
1 Month Performance	0.05%	-1.90%	-2.86%	-6.42%
1 Year Performance	3.39%	7.44%	8.71%	-6.01%

CO2 Energy Transition Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
NOEM CO2 Energy Transition	0.8959 of 5 stars	$10.56 -0.8%	N/A	+3.6%	$39.54M	N/A	70.38	N/A	Positive News
ELME Elme Communities	2.0524 of 5 stars	$1.76 +0.3%	$18.00 +925.6%	-89.5%	$155.95M	$206.36M	N/A	91	Upcoming Earnings
BANX ArrowMark Financial	N/A	$19.64 -0.4%	N/A	-7.1%	$153.39M	N/A	N/A	15,600	Positive News Dividend Announcement Short Interest Decrease
WHF WhiteHorse Finance	2.274 of 5 stars	$6.99 -0.6%	$7.25 +3.8%	+8.5%	$150.38M	$72.67M	8.86	3	News Coverage Dividend Announcement Short Interest Increase
HCMA HCM Acquisition	1.575 of 5 stars	$10.31 -0.1%	N/A	+0.3%	$145.82M	N/A	N/A	N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:NOEM) was last updated on 10/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

CO2 Energy Transition (NOEM) Competitors

NOEM vs. ELME, BANX, WHF, HCMA, and LAFA

How does CO2 Energy Transition compare to Elme Communities?

Summary

How does CO2 Energy Transition compare to ArrowMark Financial?

Summary

How does CO2 Energy Transition compare to WhiteHorse Finance?

Summary

How does CO2 Energy Transition compare to HCM Acquisition?

Summary

How does CO2 Energy Transition compare to Lafayette Acquisition?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

NOEM vs. The Competition

CO2 Energy Transition Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

CO2 Energy Transition (NOEM) Competitors

NOEM vs. ELME, BANX, WHF, HCMA, and LAFA

How does CO2 Energy Transition compare to Elme Communities?

Is NOEM or ELME more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, NOEM or ELME?

Do analysts prefer NOEM or ELME?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, NOEM or ELME?

Does the media refer more to NOEM or ELME?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in NOEM or ELME?

Summary

How does CO2 Energy Transition compare to ArrowMark Financial?

Do analysts prefer BANX or NOEM?

Is BANX or NOEM more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, BANX or NOEM?

Does the media favor BANX or NOEM?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in BANX or NOEM?

Which has better earnings & valuation, BANX or NOEM?

Summary

How does CO2 Energy Transition compare to WhiteHorse Finance?

Is WHF or NOEM more profitable?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, WHF or NOEM?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of WHF or NOEM?

Do analysts prefer WHF or NOEM?

Does the media favor WHF or NOEM?

Which has more volatility & risk, WHF or NOEM?

Summary

How does CO2 Energy Transition compare to HCM Acquisition?

Does the media refer more to HCMA or NOEM?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, HCMA or NOEM?

Do analysts prefer HCMA or NOEM?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of HCMA or NOEM?

Is HCMA or NOEM more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, HCMA or NOEM?

Summary

How does CO2 Energy Transition compare to Lafayette Acquisition?

Does the media refer more to LAFA or NOEM?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, LAFA or NOEM?

Do analysts rate LAFA or NOEM?

Is LAFA or NOEM more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

NOEM vs. The Competition

CO2 Energy Transition Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools