NYSE:TPVG

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Competitors

$15.44
-0.16 (-1.03 %)
(As of 04/13/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$15.40
Now: $15.44
$15.60
50-Day Range
$13.96
MA: $14.62
$15.60
52-Week Range
$6.56
Now: $15.44
$15.70
Volume129,175 shs
Average Volume190,304 shs
Market Capitalization$476.82 million
P/E Ratio12.66
Dividend Yield9.24%
Beta1.9

Competitors

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC (NYSE:TPVG) Vs. TSLX, NMFC, PFLT, CSWC, GAIN, and PNNT

Should you be buying TPVG stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "investors, not elsewhere classified" are considered alternatives and competitors to TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC, including Sixth Street Specialty Lending (TSLX), New Mountain Finance (NMFC), PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (PFLT), Capital Southwest (CSWC), Gladstone Investment (GAIN), and PennantPark Investment (PNNT).

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC (NYSE:TPVG) and Sixth Street Specialty Lending (NYSE:TSLX) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

Dividends

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.3%. Sixth Street Specialty Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.4%. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC pays out 93.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Sixth Street Specialty Lending pays out 84.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Sixth Street Specialty Lending has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC and Sixth Street Specialty Lending, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC02402.67
Sixth Street Specialty Lending00603.00

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC presently has a consensus target price of $10.9583, indicating a potential downside of 29.03%. Sixth Street Specialty Lending has a consensus target price of $18.50, indicating a potential downside of 16.82%. Given Sixth Street Specialty Lending's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Sixth Street Specialty Lending is more favorable than TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

26.9% of TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.7% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.4% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk and Volatility

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has a beta of 1.9, meaning that its stock price is 90% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sixth Street Specialty Lending has a beta of 1.16, meaning that its stock price is 16% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC and Sixth Street Specialty Lending's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC40.65%12.21%6.54%
Sixth Street Specialty Lending59.17%13.52%6.95%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC and Sixth Street Specialty Lending's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC$73.39 million6.50$31.76 million$1.5410.03
Sixth Street Specialty Lending$251.49 million6.00$128.28 million$1.9411.46

Sixth Street Specialty Lending has higher revenue and earnings than TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sixth Street Specialty Lending, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Sixth Street Specialty Lending beats TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC (NYSE:TPVG) and New Mountain Finance (NASDAQ:NMFC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC and New Mountain Finance's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC40.65%12.21%6.54%
New Mountain Finance4.94%10.30%3.93%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC and New Mountain Finance, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC02402.67
New Mountain Finance02202.50

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC presently has a consensus price target of $10.9583, suggesting a potential downside of 29.03%. New Mountain Finance has a consensus price target of $11.1667, suggesting a potential downside of 13.77%. Given New Mountain Finance's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe New Mountain Finance is more favorable than TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

26.9% of TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.5% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.1% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has a beta of 1.9, suggesting that its share price is 90% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, New Mountain Finance has a beta of 1.39, suggesting that its share price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC and New Mountain Finance's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC$73.39 million6.50$31.76 million$1.5410.03
New Mountain Finance$276.51 million4.53$112.56 million$1.2710.20

New Mountain Finance has higher revenue and earnings than TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than New Mountain Finance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.3%. New Mountain Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.3%. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC pays out 93.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. New Mountain Finance pays out 94.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC beats New Mountain Finance on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (NASDAQ:PFLT) and TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC (NYSE:TPVG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, risk, dividends and earnings.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

29.3% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.9% of TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares PennantPark Floating Rate Capital and TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital19.28%9.04%3.59%
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC40.65%12.21%6.54%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares PennantPark Floating Rate Capital and TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital$95.49 million5.21$18.41 million$1.1211.46
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC$73.39 million6.50$31.76 million$1.5410.03

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has lower revenue, but higher earnings than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.14 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.9%. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.3%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays out 101.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC pays out 93.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Risk and Volatility

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 1.97, meaning that its stock price is 97% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has a beta of 1.9, meaning that its stock price is 90% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital and TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital01202.67
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC02402.67

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital presently has a consensus price target of $10.50, suggesting a potential downside of 18.22%. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has a consensus price target of $10.9583, suggesting a potential downside of 29.03%. Given PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is more favorable than TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC.

Summary

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC beats PennantPark Floating Rate Capital on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC (NYSE:TPVG) and Capital Southwest (NASDAQ:CSWC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends and institutional ownership.

Volatility and Risk

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has a beta of 1.9, suggesting that its share price is 90% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Capital Southwest has a beta of 1.12, suggesting that its share price is 12% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.3%. Capital Southwest pays an annual dividend of $1.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.0%. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC pays out 93.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Capital Southwest pays out 107.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Capital Southwest has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC and Capital Southwest, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC02402.67
Capital Southwest01402.80

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC presently has a consensus target price of $10.9583, indicating a potential downside of 29.03%. Capital Southwest has a consensus target price of $18.60, indicating a potential downside of 22.34%. Given Capital Southwest's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Capital Southwest is more favorable than TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC and Capital Southwest's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC$73.39 million6.50$31.76 million$1.5410.03
Capital Southwest$62.04 million7.67$-22,350,000.00$1.5715.25

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has higher revenue and earnings than Capital Southwest. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capital Southwest, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC and Capital Southwest's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC40.65%12.21%6.54%
Capital Southwest-10.38%10.17%4.73%

Insider & Institutional Ownership

26.9% of TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.9% of Capital Southwest shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 7.4% of Capital Southwest shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC beats Capital Southwest on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Gladstone Investment (NASDAQ:GAIN) and TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC (NYSE:TPVG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, valuation, earnings and dividends.

Volatility & Risk

Gladstone Investment has a beta of 1.44, suggesting that its stock price is 44% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has a beta of 1.9, suggesting that its stock price is 90% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Gladstone Investment pays an annual dividend of $0.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.2%. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.3%. Gladstone Investment pays out 93.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC pays out 93.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gladstone Investment has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Gladstone Investment and TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Gladstone Investment0000N/A
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC02402.67

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has a consensus target price of $10.9583, indicating a potential downside of 29.03%. Given TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC is more favorable than Gladstone Investment.

Profitability

This table compares Gladstone Investment and TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Gladstone Investment-34.86%5.53%3.52%
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC40.65%12.21%6.54%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Gladstone Investment and TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gladstone Investment$61.92 million7.24$-7,230,000.00$0.9015.00
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC$73.39 million6.50$31.76 million$1.5410.03

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has higher revenue and earnings than Gladstone Investment. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gladstone Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

12.1% of Gladstone Investment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.9% of TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC shares are held by institutional investors. 2.6% of Gladstone Investment shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC beats Gladstone Investment on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC (NYSE:TPVG) and PennantPark Investment (NASDAQ:PNNT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC and PennantPark Investment's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC$73.39 million6.50$31.76 million$1.5410.03
PennantPark Investment$100.22 million4.30$-15,970,000.00$0.6110.54

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has higher earnings, but lower revenue than PennantPark Investment. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PennantPark Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has a beta of 1.9, indicating that its stock price is 90% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, PennantPark Investment has a beta of 1.98, indicating that its stock price is 98% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC and PennantPark Investment's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC40.65%12.21%6.54%
PennantPark Investment-15.93%7.56%3.07%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC and PennantPark Investment, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC02402.67
PennantPark Investment01302.75

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC presently has a consensus price target of $10.9583, suggesting a potential downside of 29.03%. PennantPark Investment has a consensus price target of $5.00, suggesting a potential downside of 22.24%. Given PennantPark Investment's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe PennantPark Investment is more favorable than TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

26.9% of TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.9% of PennantPark Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of PennantPark Investment shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.3%. PennantPark Investment pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.5%. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC pays out 93.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennantPark Investment pays out 78.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and PennantPark Investment has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Summary

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC beats PennantPark Investment on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.


TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Sixth Street Specialty Lending logo
TSLX
Sixth Street Specialty Lending
1.7$22.24-0.2%$1.51 billion$251.49 million9.23Analyst Downgrade
News Coverage
New Mountain Finance logo
NMFC
New Mountain Finance
1.2$12.95-0.2%$1.25 billion$276.51 million-1,293.71Decrease in Short Interest
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital logo
PFLT
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital
1.0$12.84-0.8%$497.81 million$95.49 million27.32Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Capital Southwest logo
CSWC
Capital Southwest
1.4$23.95-0.2%$475.84 million$62.04 million-59.88Analyst Upgrade
Gladstone Investment logo
GAIN
Gladstone Investment
1.2$13.50-0.5%$448.27 million$61.92 million-25.00
PennantPark Investment logo
PNNT
PennantPark Investment
1.3$6.43-5.1%$431.10 million$100.22 million-26.79
Stellus Capital Investment logo
SCM
Stellus Capital Investment
1.2$13.62-0.1%$265.40 million$58.91 million54.48
Oaktree Strategic Income logo
OCSI
Oaktree Strategic Income
1.3$8.50-0.0%$250.47 million$39.53 million-212.45
PTMN
Portman Ridge Finance
1.2$2.42-1.2%$181.97 million$26.50 million-8.34
Safeguard Scientifics logo
SFE
Safeguard Scientifics
0.9$6.48-0.5%$135.72 millionN/A-4.35News Coverage
First Eagle Alternative Capital BDC logo
FCRD
First Eagle Alternative Capital BDC
1.2$4.19-1.4%$126.16 million$52.49 million-2.30
OFS Capital logo
OFS
OFS Capital
1.1$9.08-0.6%$121.75 million$52.52 million-16.81News Coverage
Investcorp Credit Management BDC logo
ICMB
Investcorp Credit Management BDC
1.2$5.68-0.4%$79.04 million$34.46 million-3.76Decrease in Short Interest
TURN
180 Degree Capital
0.8$7.28-0.0%$75.52 millionN/A0.00
Rand Capital logo
RAND
Rand Capital
1.3$18.50-1.1%$47.77 million$2.72 million10.63Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
Live Ventures logo
LIVE
Live Ventures
0.9$29.75-2.5%$46.26 million$191.70 million-25.21
Firsthand Technology Value Fund logo
SVVC
Firsthand Technology Value Fund
0.8$6.25-3.5%$43.08 million$1.79 million-0.81High Trading Volume
News Coverage
Gap Down
Capitala Finance logo
CPTA
Capitala Finance
1.1$15.86-0.6%$43.00 million$44.03 million-1.19Decrease in Short Interest
LYL
Dragon Victory International
0.4$1.60-11.3%$18.62 million$10,000.000.00News Coverage
Gap Down
This page was last updated on 4/13/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.