TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC (TPVG) Competitors

$5.62 -0.15 (-2.51%)

As of 03:49 PM Eastern

TPVG vs. ARCC, OCSL, TSLX, PFLT, and AWF

Should you be buying TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC include Ares Capital (ARCC), Oaktree Specialty Lending (OCSL), Sixth Street Specialty Lending (TSLX), PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (PFLT), and AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund (AWF). These companies are all part of the "finance" sector.

How does TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC compare to Ares Capital?

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC (NYSE:TPVG) and Ares Capital (NASDAQ:ARCC) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.

12.8% of TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.4% of Ares Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Ares Capital shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has a net margin of 46.77% compared to Ares Capital's net margin of 37.30%. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC's return on equity of 11.53% beat Ares Capital's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC	46.77%	11.53%	4.95%
Ares Capital	37.30%	9.85%	4.59%

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has a beta of 1.28, meaning that its share price is 28% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ares Capital has a beta of 0.58, meaning that its share price is 42% less volatile than the S&P 500.

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC currently has a consensus price target of $5.63, suggesting a potential upside of 0.00%. Ares Capital has a consensus price target of $20.75, suggesting a potential upside of 10.93%. Given Ares Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Ares Capital is more favorable than TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC	3 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50
Ares Capital	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.82

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 16.4%. Ares Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.3%. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC pays out 86.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Ares Capital pays out 117.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Ares Capital has higher revenue and earnings than TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ares Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC	$90.93M	2.51	$49.21M	$1.06	5.31
Ares Capital	$1.36B	9.87	$1.30B	$1.63	11.48

In the previous week, Ares Capital had 8 more articles in the media than TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Ares Capital and 10 mentions for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC. Ares Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC's score of 0.47 indicating that Ares Capital is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC	4 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Ares Capital	10 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Ares Capital beats TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC compare to Oaktree Specialty Lending?

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC (NYSE:TPVG) and Oaktree Specialty Lending (NASDAQ:OCSL) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 16.4%. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.9%. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC pays out 86.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 210.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has higher revenue and earnings than Oaktree Specialty Lending. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oaktree Specialty Lending, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC	$90.93M	2.51	$49.21M	$1.06	5.31
Oaktree Specialty Lending	$55.37M	19.28	$33.92M	$0.57	21.27

12.8% of TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.8% of Oaktree Specialty Lending shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Oaktree Specialty Lending shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC currently has a consensus price target of $5.63, suggesting a potential upside of 0.00%. Oaktree Specialty Lending has a consensus price target of $12.38, suggesting a potential upside of 2.09%. Given Oaktree Specialty Lending's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Oaktree Specialty Lending is more favorable than TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC	3 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50
Oaktree Specialty Lending	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has a beta of 1.28, meaning that its share price is 28% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.52, meaning that its share price is 48% less volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Oaktree Specialty Lending had 6 more articles in the media than TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Oaktree Specialty Lending and 10 mentions for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC's average media sentiment score of 0.47 beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's score of 0.39 indicating that TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC	4 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Oaktree Specialty Lending	4 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has a net margin of 46.77% compared to Oaktree Specialty Lending's net margin of 16.66%. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC's return on equity of 11.53% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC	46.77%	11.53%	4.95%
Oaktree Specialty Lending	16.66%	9.56%	4.60%

Summary

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC beats Oaktree Specialty Lending on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC compare to Sixth Street Specialty Lending?

Sixth Street Specialty Lending (NYSE:TSLX) and TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC (NYSE:TPVG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, risk, earnings and valuation.

Sixth Street Specialty Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.6%. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 16.4%. Sixth Street Specialty Lending pays out 146.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC pays out 86.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Sixth Street Specialty Lending has higher revenue and earnings than TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sixth Street Specialty Lending, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Sixth Street Specialty Lending	$151.93M	10.90	$209.99M	$1.15	15.16
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC	$90.93M	2.51	$49.21M	$1.06	5.31

70.3% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.8% of TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC shares are held by institutional investors. 3.8% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Sixth Street Specialty Lending presently has a consensus price target of $20.29, indicating a potential upside of 16.37%. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has a consensus price target of $5.63, indicating a potential upside of 0.00%. Given Sixth Street Specialty Lending's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Sixth Street Specialty Lending is more favorable than TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Sixth Street Specialty Lending	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC	3 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50

Sixth Street Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.65, indicating that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has a beta of 1.28, indicating that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Sixth Street Specialty Lending had 29 more articles in the media than TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC. MarketBeat recorded 39 mentions for Sixth Street Specialty Lending and 10 mentions for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC's average media sentiment score of 0.47 beat Sixth Street Specialty Lending's score of -0.10 indicating that TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Sixth Street Specialty Lending	5 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	13 Neutral mention(s)	8 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC	4 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has a net margin of 46.77% compared to Sixth Street Specialty Lending's net margin of 25.25%. Sixth Street Specialty Lending's return on equity of 11.92% beat TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Sixth Street Specialty Lending	25.25%	11.92%	5.54%
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC	46.77%	11.53%	4.95%

Summary

Sixth Street Specialty Lending beats TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC compare to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital?

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC (NYSE:TPVG) and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (NYSE:PFLT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC presently has a consensus price target of $5.63, indicating a potential upside of 0.00%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a consensus price target of $10.25, indicating a potential upside of 17.21%. Given PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is more favorable than TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC	3 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88

In the previous week, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC and TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC both had 10 articles in the media. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC's average media sentiment score of 0.47 beat PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's score of -0.19 indicating that TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC	4 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 16.4%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.1%. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC pays out 86.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays out 198.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

12.8% of TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.8% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has a beta of 1.28, suggesting that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 0.78, suggesting that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the S&P 500.

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has a net margin of 46.77% compared to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's net margin of 23.08%. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC's return on equity of 11.53% beat PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC	46.77%	11.53%	4.95%
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	23.08%	9.88%	3.88%

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has higher revenue and earnings than TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC	$90.93M	2.51	$49.21M	$1.06	5.31
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	$261.43M	3.32	$66.36M	$0.62	14.10

Summary

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC compare to AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund?

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC (NYSE:TPVG) and AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund (NYSE:AWF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has higher revenue and earnings than AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC	$90.93M	2.51	$49.21M	$1.06	5.31
AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has a net margin of 46.77% compared to AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund's net margin of 0.00%. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC's return on equity of 11.53% beat AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC	46.77%	11.53%	4.95%
AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund	N/A	N/A	N/A

12.8% of TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has a beta of 1.28, suggesting that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund has a beta of 0.68, suggesting that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC had 9 more articles in the media than AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC and 1 mentions for AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund. AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund's average media sentiment score of 1.48 beat TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC's score of 0.47 indicating that AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC	4 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 16.4%. AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.74 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.3%. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC pays out 86.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC presently has a consensus price target of $5.63, indicating a potential upside of 0.00%. Given TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC is more favorable than AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC	3 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50
AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Summary

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC beats AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TPVG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

TPVG vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC	FIN Industry	Finance Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$228.38M	$1.31B	$13.48B	$22.92B
Dividend Yield	15.94%	12.34%	5.75%	4.02%
P/E Ratio	5.31	22.52	23.25	29.03
Price / Sales	2.51	18.24	179.03	24.74
Price / Cash	5.82	7.52	20.30	19.21
Price / Book	0.64	0.80	2.21	4.66
Net Income	$49.21M	$118.06M	$1.11B	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	N/A	N/A	N/A	-1.09%
1 Month Performance	10.19%	2.23%	2.21%	4.17%
1 Year Performance	-9.42%	-15.93%	13.12%	29.27%

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
TPVG TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC	1.89 of 5 stars	$5.63 -2.5%	$5.63	-7.2%	$228.38M	$90.93M	5.31	N/A	Earnings Report
ARCC Ares Capital	3.6836 of 5 stars	$19.18 -0.4%	$20.75 +8.2%	-9.8%	$13.82B	$3.05B	11.77	2,550
OCSL Oaktree Specialty Lending	3.213 of 5 stars	$12.90 +0.3%	$12.17 -5.7%	-11.8%	$1.13B	$316.80M	35.83	N/A	Earnings Report Dividend Cut
TSLX Sixth Street Specialty Lending	3.6885 of 5 stars	$19.76 +0.6%	$21.64 +9.5%	-15.5%	$1.87B	$216.57M	10.92	N/A	News Coverage Earnings Report Dividend Increase Analyst Downgrade
PFLT PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	4.3174 of 5 stars	$9.19 +1.3%	$10.25 +11.6%	N/A	$899.91M	$261.43M	27.01	658	Earnings Report Dividend Announcement

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:TPVG) was last updated on 5/11/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC (TPVG) Competitors

TPVG vs. ARCC, OCSL, TSLX, PFLT, and AWF

How does TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC compare to Ares Capital?

Summary

How does TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC compare to Oaktree Specialty Lending?

Summary

How does TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC compare to Sixth Street Specialty Lending?

Summary

How does TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC compare to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital?

Summary

How does TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC compare to AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

TPVG vs. The Competition

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC (TPVG) Competitors

TPVG vs. ARCC, OCSL, TSLX, PFLT, and AWF

How does TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC compare to Ares Capital?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in TPVG or ARCC?

Is TPVG or ARCC more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, TPVG or ARCC?

Do analysts recommend TPVG or ARCC?

Is TPVG or ARCC a better dividend stock?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, TPVG or ARCC?

Does the media refer more to TPVG or ARCC?

Summary

How does TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC compare to Oaktree Specialty Lending?

Is TPVG or OCSL a better dividend stock?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, TPVG or OCSL?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in TPVG or OCSL?

Do analysts recommend TPVG or OCSL?

Which has more risk and volatility, TPVG or OCSL?

Does the media refer more to TPVG or OCSL?

Is TPVG or OCSL more profitable?

Summary

How does TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC compare to Sixth Street Specialty Lending?

Is TSLX or TPVG a better dividend stock?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, TSLX or TPVG?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of TSLX or TPVG?

Do analysts rate TSLX or TPVG?

Which has more risk & volatility, TSLX or TPVG?

Does the media refer more to TSLX or TPVG?

Is TSLX or TPVG more profitable?

Summary

How does TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC compare to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital?

Do analysts prefer TPVG or PFLT?

Does the media favor TPVG or PFLT?

Is TPVG or PFLT a better dividend stock?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in TPVG or PFLT?

Which has more volatility and risk, TPVG or PFLT?

Is TPVG or PFLT more profitable?

Which has better earnings & valuation, TPVG or PFLT?

Summary

How does TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC compare to AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund?

Which has better earnings & valuation, TPVG or AWF?

Is TPVG or AWF more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in TPVG or AWF?

Which has more volatility and risk, TPVG or AWF?

Does the media favor TPVG or AWF?

Is TPVG or AWF a better dividend stock?

Do analysts prefer TPVG or AWF?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

TPVG vs. The Competition

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools