Does the media favor KRNT or PPIH?

In the previous week, Perma-Pipe International had 7 more articles in the media than Kornit Digital. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Perma-Pipe International and 2 mentions for Kornit Digital. Kornit Digital's average media sentiment score of 1.46 beat Perma-Pipe International's score of 0.30 indicating that Kornit Digital is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Kornit Digital 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Perma-Pipe International 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media favor SSYS or PPIH?

In the previous week, Stratasys had 7 more articles in the media than Perma-Pipe International. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Stratasys and 9 mentions for Perma-Pipe International. Perma-Pipe International's average media sentiment score of 0.30 beat Stratasys' score of -0.14 indicating that Perma-Pipe International is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Stratasys 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Perma-Pipe International 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media prefer HY or PPIH?

In the previous week, Perma-Pipe International had 7 more articles in the media than Hyster-Yale. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Perma-Pipe International and 2 mentions for Hyster-Yale. Perma-Pipe International's average media sentiment score of 0.30 beat Hyster-Yale's score of -0.08 indicating that Perma-Pipe International is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Hyster-Yale 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Perma-Pipe International 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media prefer DDD or PPIH?

In the previous week, Perma-Pipe International had 6 more articles in the media than 3D Systems. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Perma-Pipe International and 3 mentions for 3D Systems. 3D Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat Perma-Pipe International's score of 0.30 indicating that 3D Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment 3D Systems 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Perma-Pipe International 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media refer more to PPIH or CMCO?

In the previous week, Perma-Pipe International had 4 more articles in the media than Columbus McKinnon. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Perma-Pipe International and 5 mentions for Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon's average media sentiment score of 1.46 beat Perma-Pipe International's score of 0.30 indicating that Columbus McKinnon is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Perma-Pipe International 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Columbus McKinnon 4 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Perma-Pipe International (PPIH) Competitors

$29.37 -0.18 (-0.61%)

Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$30.04 +0.67 (+2.29%)

As of 07:59 PM Eastern

Compare

PPIH vs. KRNT, SSYS, HY, DDD, and CMCO

Should you buy Perma-Pipe International stock or one of its competitors? Perma-Pipe International's main competitors and comparable companies include Kornit Digital (KRNT), Stratasys (SSYS), Hyster-Yale (HY), 3D Systems (DDD), and Columbus McKinnon (CMCO). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "industrial machinery & supplies & components" industry.

How does Perma-Pipe International compare to Kornit Digital?

Kornit Digital (NASDAQ:KRNT) and Perma-Pipe International (NASDAQ:PPIH) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, valuation, earnings, risk and institutional ownership.

Kornit Digital has a beta of 1.74, indicating that its share price is 74% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Perma-Pipe International has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

92.8% of Kornit Digital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.4% of Perma-Pipe International shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Kornit Digital shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Perma-Pipe International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Perma-Pipe International has higher revenue and earnings than Kornit Digital. Kornit Digital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Perma-Pipe International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Kornit Digital	$208.20M	3.21	-$13.52M	-$0.48	N/A
Perma-Pipe International	$210.93M	1.13	$17.03M	$1.69	17.38

In the previous week, Perma-Pipe International had 7 more articles in the media than Kornit Digital. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Perma-Pipe International and 2 mentions for Kornit Digital. Kornit Digital's average media sentiment score of 1.46 beat Perma-Pipe International's score of 0.30 indicating that Kornit Digital is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Kornit Digital	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Perma-Pipe International	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Kornit Digital presently has a consensus price target of $21.50, indicating a potential upside of 38.17%. Perma-Pipe International has a consensus price target of $36.00, indicating a potential upside of 22.57%. Given Kornit Digital's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Kornit Digital is more favorable than Perma-Pipe International.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Kornit Digital	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.17
Perma-Pipe International	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Perma-Pipe International has a net margin of 6.89% compared to Kornit Digital's net margin of -9.42%. Perma-Pipe International's return on equity of 21.81% beat Kornit Digital's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Kornit Digital	-9.42%	-1.00%	-0.91%
Perma-Pipe International	6.89%	21.81%	8.93%

Summary

Perma-Pipe International beats Kornit Digital on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Perma-Pipe International compare to Stratasys?

Stratasys (NASDAQ:SSYS) and Perma-Pipe International (NASDAQ:PPIH) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, earnings and dividends.

Stratasys has a beta of 1.93, suggesting that its stock price is 93% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Perma-Pipe International has a beta of 0.59, suggesting that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

Perma-Pipe International has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Stratasys. Stratasys is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Perma-Pipe International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Stratasys	$551.10M	1.18	-$104.29M	-$1.34	N/A
Perma-Pipe International	$210.93M	1.13	$17.03M	$1.69	17.38

75.8% of Stratasys shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.4% of Perma-Pipe International shares are held by institutional investors. 4.3% of Stratasys shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Perma-Pipe International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Stratasys had 7 more articles in the media than Perma-Pipe International. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Stratasys and 9 mentions for Perma-Pipe International. Perma-Pipe International's average media sentiment score of 0.30 beat Stratasys' score of -0.14 indicating that Perma-Pipe International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Stratasys	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Perma-Pipe International	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Perma-Pipe International has a net margin of 6.89% compared to Stratasys' net margin of -21.05%. Perma-Pipe International's return on equity of 21.81% beat Stratasys' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Stratasys	-21.05%	-1.77%	-1.38%
Perma-Pipe International	6.89%	21.81%	8.93%

Stratasys currently has a consensus price target of $12.33, suggesting a potential upside of 62.92%. Perma-Pipe International has a consensus price target of $36.00, suggesting a potential upside of 22.57%. Given Stratasys' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Stratasys is more favorable than Perma-Pipe International.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Stratasys	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Perma-Pipe International	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Summary

Stratasys beats Perma-Pipe International on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Perma-Pipe International compare to Hyster-Yale?

Hyster-Yale (NYSE:HY) and Perma-Pipe International (NASDAQ:PPIH) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings and media sentiment.

Hyster-Yale currently has a consensus target price of $47.50, indicating a potential upside of 39.52%. Perma-Pipe International has a consensus target price of $36.00, indicating a potential upside of 22.57%. Given Hyster-Yale's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Hyster-Yale is more favorable than Perma-Pipe International.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hyster-Yale	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
Perma-Pipe International	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

In the previous week, Perma-Pipe International had 7 more articles in the media than Hyster-Yale. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Perma-Pipe International and 2 mentions for Hyster-Yale. Perma-Pipe International's average media sentiment score of 0.30 beat Hyster-Yale's score of -0.08 indicating that Perma-Pipe International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Hyster-Yale	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Perma-Pipe International	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Perma-Pipe International has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Hyster-Yale. Hyster-Yale is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Perma-Pipe International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hyster-Yale	$3.77B	0.16	-$60.10M	-$6.56	N/A
Perma-Pipe International	$210.93M	1.13	$17.03M	$1.69	17.38

Perma-Pipe International has a net margin of 6.89% compared to Hyster-Yale's net margin of -3.33%. Perma-Pipe International's return on equity of 21.81% beat Hyster-Yale's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hyster-Yale	-3.33%	-21.03%	-4.87%
Perma-Pipe International	6.89%	21.81%	8.93%

Hyster-Yale has a beta of 1.65, meaning that its share price is 65% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Perma-Pipe International has a beta of 0.59, meaning that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

46.5% of Hyster-Yale shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.4% of Perma-Pipe International shares are owned by institutional investors. 37.8% of Hyster-Yale shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Perma-Pipe International shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Perma-Pipe International beats Hyster-Yale on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Perma-Pipe International compare to 3D Systems?

3D Systems (NYSE:DDD) and Perma-Pipe International (NASDAQ:PPIH) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, media sentiment and risk.

3D Systems currently has a consensus target price of $5.50, indicating a potential upside of 67.68%. Perma-Pipe International has a consensus target price of $36.00, indicating a potential upside of 22.57%. Given 3D Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe 3D Systems is more favorable than Perma-Pipe International.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
3D Systems	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40
Perma-Pipe International	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

3D Systems has a beta of 2.75, meaning that its share price is 175% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Perma-Pipe International has a beta of 0.59, meaning that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

3D Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Perma-Pipe International. 3D Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Perma-Pipe International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
3D Systems	$386.90M	1.41	$29.88M	-$0.41	N/A
Perma-Pipe International	$210.93M	1.13	$17.03M	$1.69	17.38

64.5% of 3D Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.4% of Perma-Pipe International shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.0% of 3D Systems shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Perma-Pipe International shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Perma-Pipe International had 6 more articles in the media than 3D Systems. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Perma-Pipe International and 3 mentions for 3D Systems. 3D Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat Perma-Pipe International's score of 0.30 indicating that 3D Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
3D Systems	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Perma-Pipe International	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Perma-Pipe International has a net margin of 6.89% compared to 3D Systems' net margin of -14.15%. Perma-Pipe International's return on equity of 21.81% beat 3D Systems' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
3D Systems	-14.15%	-19.56%	-8.92%
Perma-Pipe International	6.89%	21.81%	8.93%

Summary

3D Systems beats Perma-Pipe International on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Perma-Pipe International compare to Columbus McKinnon?

Perma-Pipe International (NASDAQ:PPIH) and Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment and risk.

Perma-Pipe International presently has a consensus target price of $36.00, suggesting a potential upside of 22.57%. Columbus McKinnon has a consensus target price of $23.00, suggesting a potential upside of 33.57%. Given Columbus McKinnon's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than Perma-Pipe International.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Perma-Pipe International	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Columbus McKinnon	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80

Perma-Pipe International has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Perma-Pipe International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Perma-Pipe International	$210.93M	1.13	$17.03M	$1.69	17.38
Columbus McKinnon	$1.19B	0.42	-$229.54M	-$7.46	N/A

In the previous week, Perma-Pipe International had 4 more articles in the media than Columbus McKinnon. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Perma-Pipe International and 5 mentions for Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon's average media sentiment score of 1.46 beat Perma-Pipe International's score of 0.30 indicating that Columbus McKinnon is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Perma-Pipe International	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Columbus McKinnon	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Perma-Pipe International has a beta of 0.59, meaning that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.36, meaning that its share price is 36% more volatile than the broader market.

28.4% of Perma-Pipe International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Perma-Pipe International shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Columbus McKinnon shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Perma-Pipe International has a net margin of 6.89% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of -21.25%. Perma-Pipe International's return on equity of 21.81% beat Columbus McKinnon's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Perma-Pipe International	6.89%	21.81%	8.93%
Columbus McKinnon	-21.25%	10.02%	2.36%

Summary

Columbus McKinnon beats Perma-Pipe International on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Perma-Pipe International News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PPIH and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

PPIH vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Perma-Pipe International	Machinery Industry	Industrials Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$240.12M	$11.23B	$10.29B	$12.81B
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.26%	97.17%	10.55%
P/E Ratio	15.46	20.29	25.40	25.11
Price / Sales	1.13	63.39	355.16	90.53
Price / Cash	10.90	23.09	23.93	51.83
Price / Book	2.62	4.27	4.79	6.18
Net Income	$17.03M	$367.28M	$612.72M	$358.18M
7 Day Performance	6.49%	-1.56%	-1.31%	-2.34%
1 Month Performance	13.18%	-2.84%	-3.46%	-2.50%
1 Year Performance	-10.24%	8.54%	7.00%	9.87%

Perma-Pipe International Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
PPIH Perma-Pipe International	1.8667 of 5 stars	$29.37 -0.6%	$36.00 +22.6%	-4.4%	$240.12M	$210.93M	15.46	610	News Coverage Earnings Report
KRNT Kornit Digital	3.2596 of 5 stars	$16.07 -4.6%	$21.50 +33.8%	+5.5%	$723.56M	$208.20M	N/A	880	Positive News
SSYS Stratasys	2.6635 of 5 stars	$7.59 -2.1%	$12.33 +62.5%	-24.2%	$667.84M	$551.10M	N/A	1,757	Trending News Analyst Revision
HY Hyster-Yale	2.4473 of 5 stars	$32.68 -3.5%	$47.50 +45.3%	-2.9%	$607.12M	$3.77B	N/A	7,500	News Coverage
DDD 3D Systems	1.8192 of 5 stars	$3.27 -0.3%	$5.50 +68.2%	+62.2%	$544.96M	$386.90M	N/A	1,418	News Coverage Gap Up

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:PPIH) was last updated on 9/10/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Perma-Pipe International (PPIH) Competitors

PPIH vs. KRNT, SSYS, HY, DDD, and CMCO

How does Perma-Pipe International compare to Kornit Digital?

Summary

How does Perma-Pipe International compare to Stratasys?

Summary

How does Perma-Pipe International compare to Hyster-Yale?

Summary

How does Perma-Pipe International compare to 3D Systems?

Summary

How does Perma-Pipe International compare to Columbus McKinnon?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PPIH vs. The Competition

Perma-Pipe International Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Perma-Pipe International (PPIH) Competitors

PPIH vs. KRNT, SSYS, HY, DDD, and CMCO

How does Perma-Pipe International compare to Kornit Digital?

Which has more volatility and risk, KRNT or PPIH?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in KRNT or PPIH?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, KRNT or PPIH?

Does the media favor KRNT or PPIH?

Do analysts recommend KRNT or PPIH?

Is KRNT or PPIH more profitable?

Summary

How does Perma-Pipe International compare to Stratasys?

Which has more volatility & risk, SSYS or PPIH?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, SSYS or PPIH?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of SSYS or PPIH?

Does the media favor SSYS or PPIH?

Is SSYS or PPIH more profitable?

Do analysts prefer SSYS or PPIH?

Summary

How does Perma-Pipe International compare to Hyster-Yale?

Do analysts prefer HY or PPIH?

Does the media prefer HY or PPIH?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, HY or PPIH?

Is HY or PPIH more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, HY or PPIH?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in HY or PPIH?

Summary

How does Perma-Pipe International compare to 3D Systems?

Do analysts prefer DDD or PPIH?

Which has more volatility & risk, DDD or PPIH?

Which has better earnings and valuation, DDD or PPIH?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in DDD or PPIH?

Does the media prefer DDD or PPIH?

Is DDD or PPIH more profitable?

Summary

How does Perma-Pipe International compare to Columbus McKinnon?

Do analysts recommend PPIH or CMCO?

Which has better valuation & earnings, PPIH or CMCO?

Does the media refer more to PPIH or CMCO?

Which has more risk and volatility, PPIH or CMCO?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of PPIH or CMCO?

Is PPIH or CMCO more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PPIH vs. The Competition

Perma-Pipe International Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools