Does the media prefer PPIH or ELMT?

In the previous week, Elmet Group had 14 more articles in the media than Perma-Pipe International. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Elmet Group and 2 mentions for Perma-Pipe International. Perma-Pipe International's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Elmet Group's score of 0.87 indicating that Perma-Pipe International is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Perma-Pipe International 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Elmet Group 4 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor PPIH or SSYS?

In the previous week, Stratasys had 21 more articles in the media than Perma-Pipe International. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Stratasys and 2 mentions for Perma-Pipe International. Perma-Pipe International's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Stratasys' score of 0.18 indicating that Perma-Pipe International is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Perma-Pipe International 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Stratasys 2 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 10 Neutral mention(s) 4 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media refer more to PPIH or CMCO?

In the previous week, Perma-Pipe International and Perma-Pipe International both had 2 articles in the media. Columbus McKinnon's average media sentiment score of 1.18 beat Perma-Pipe International's score of 0.89 indicating that Columbus McKinnon is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Perma-Pipe International 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Columbus McKinnon 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to PPIH or HY?

In the previous week, Hyster-Yale had 16 more articles in the media than Perma-Pipe International. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Hyster-Yale and 2 mentions for Perma-Pipe International. Perma-Pipe International's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Hyster-Yale's score of 0.82 indicating that Perma-Pipe International is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Perma-Pipe International 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Hyster-Yale 2 Very Positive mention(s) 4 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Perma-Pipe International (PPIH) Competitors

$28.26 -0.51 (-1.77%)

Closing price 11/13/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$28.44 +0.18 (+0.64%)

As of 11/13/2026 07:30 PM Eastern

Compare

PPIH vs. KRNT, ELMT, SSYS, CMCO, and HY

Should you buy Perma-Pipe International stock or one of its competitors? Perma-Pipe International's main competitors and comparable companies include Kornit Digital (KRNT), Elmet Group (ELMT), Stratasys (SSYS), Columbus McKinnon (CMCO), and Hyster-Yale (HY). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "industrial machinery & supplies & components" industry.

How does Perma-Pipe International compare to Kornit Digital?

Perma-Pipe International (NASDAQ:PPIH) and Kornit Digital (NASDAQ:KRNT) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and media sentiment.

28.4% of Perma-Pipe International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.8% of Kornit Digital shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Perma-Pipe International shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Kornit Digital shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Perma-Pipe International has a beta of 0.63, suggesting that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kornit Digital has a beta of 1.79, suggesting that its stock price is 79% more volatile than the broader market.

Perma-Pipe International presently has a consensus price target of $37.00, suggesting a potential upside of 30.93%. Kornit Digital has a consensus price target of $21.00, suggesting a potential upside of 25.07%. Given Perma-Pipe International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Perma-Pipe International is more favorable than Kornit Digital.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Perma-Pipe International	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Kornit Digital	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

In the previous week, Perma-Pipe International had 1 more articles in the media than Kornit Digital. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Perma-Pipe International and 1 mentions for Kornit Digital. Kornit Digital's average media sentiment score of 1.45 beat Perma-Pipe International's score of 0.89 indicating that Kornit Digital is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Perma-Pipe International	Positive
Kornit Digital	Positive

Perma-Pipe International has a net margin of 6.89% compared to Kornit Digital's net margin of -9.42%. Perma-Pipe International's return on equity of 21.58% beat Kornit Digital's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Perma-Pipe International	6.89%	21.58%	8.79%
Kornit Digital	-9.42%	-1.00%	-0.91%

Perma-Pipe International has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Kornit Digital. Kornit Digital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Perma-Pipe International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Perma-Pipe International	$210.93M	1.10	$17.03M	$1.90	14.87
Kornit Digital	$215.85M	3.34	-$13.52M	-$0.48	N/A

Summary

Perma-Pipe International beats Kornit Digital on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Perma-Pipe International compare to Elmet Group?

Perma-Pipe International (NASDAQ:PPIH) and Elmet Group (NASDAQ:ELMT) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and media sentiment.

28.4% of Perma-Pipe International shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Perma-Pipe International shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 44.2% of Elmet Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Elmet Group had 14 more articles in the media than Perma-Pipe International. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Elmet Group and 2 mentions for Perma-Pipe International. Perma-Pipe International's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Elmet Group's score of 0.87 indicating that Perma-Pipe International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Perma-Pipe International	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Elmet Group	4 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Perma-Pipe International presently has a consensus price target of $37.00, suggesting a potential upside of 30.93%. Elmet Group has a consensus price target of $28.00, suggesting a potential upside of 41.20%. Given Elmet Group's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Elmet Group is more favorable than Perma-Pipe International.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Perma-Pipe International	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Elmet Group	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Perma-Pipe International has a net margin of 6.89% compared to Elmet Group's net margin of 0.00%. Perma-Pipe International's return on equity of 21.58% beat Elmet Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Perma-Pipe International	6.89%	21.58%	8.79%
Elmet Group	N/A	N/A	N/A

Perma-Pipe International has higher revenue and earnings than Elmet Group. Perma-Pipe International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Elmet Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Perma-Pipe International	$210.93M	1.10	$17.03M	$1.90	14.87
Elmet Group	N/A	N/A	N/A	$0.41	48.37

Summary

Perma-Pipe International beats Elmet Group on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Perma-Pipe International compare to Stratasys?

Perma-Pipe International (NASDAQ:PPIH) and Stratasys (NASDAQ:SSYS) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

28.4% of Perma-Pipe International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.8% of Stratasys shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Perma-Pipe International shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of Stratasys shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Perma-Pipe International has a beta of 0.63, suggesting that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Stratasys has a beta of 1.83, suggesting that its share price is 83% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Stratasys had 21 more articles in the media than Perma-Pipe International. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Stratasys and 2 mentions for Perma-Pipe International. Perma-Pipe International's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Stratasys' score of 0.18 indicating that Perma-Pipe International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Perma-Pipe International	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Stratasys	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	10 Neutral mention(s)	4 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Perma-Pipe International has a net margin of 6.89% compared to Stratasys' net margin of -12.61%. Perma-Pipe International's return on equity of 21.58% beat Stratasys' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Perma-Pipe International	6.89%	21.58%	8.79%
Stratasys	-12.61%	-1.41%	-1.10%

Perma-Pipe International currently has a consensus target price of $37.00, suggesting a potential upside of 30.93%. Stratasys has a consensus target price of $10.75, suggesting a potential upside of 85.03%. Given Stratasys' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Stratasys is more favorable than Perma-Pipe International.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Perma-Pipe International	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Stratasys	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

Perma-Pipe International has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Stratasys. Stratasys is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Perma-Pipe International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Perma-Pipe International	$210.93M	1.10	$17.03M	$1.90	14.87
Stratasys	$551.10M	0.93	-$104.29M	-$1.34	N/A

Summary

Perma-Pipe International beats Stratasys on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Perma-Pipe International compare to Columbus McKinnon?

Perma-Pipe International (NASDAQ:PPIH) and Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, risk, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

Perma-Pipe International has a beta of 0.63, suggesting that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.49, suggesting that its stock price is 49% more volatile than the broader market.

Perma-Pipe International currently has a consensus target price of $37.00, indicating a potential upside of 30.93%. Columbus McKinnon has a consensus target price of $23.50, indicating a potential upside of 13.53%. Given Perma-Pipe International's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Perma-Pipe International is more favorable than Columbus McKinnon.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Perma-Pipe International	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Columbus McKinnon	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40

Perma-Pipe International has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Columbus McKinnon. Columbus McKinnon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Perma-Pipe International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Perma-Pipe International	$210.93M	1.10	$17.03M	$1.90	14.87
Columbus McKinnon	$1.19B	0.50	-$229.54M	-$8.38	N/A

In the previous week, Perma-Pipe International and Perma-Pipe International both had 2 articles in the media. Columbus McKinnon's average media sentiment score of 1.18 beat Perma-Pipe International's score of 0.89 indicating that Columbus McKinnon is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Perma-Pipe International	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Columbus McKinnon	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Perma-Pipe International has a net margin of 6.89% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of -19.61%. Perma-Pipe International's return on equity of 21.58% beat Columbus McKinnon's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Perma-Pipe International	6.89%	21.58%	8.79%
Columbus McKinnon	-19.61%	13.49%	2.26%

28.4% of Perma-Pipe International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Perma-Pipe International shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Perma-Pipe International beats Columbus McKinnon on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Perma-Pipe International compare to Hyster-Yale?

Perma-Pipe International (NASDAQ:PPIH) and Hyster-Yale (NYSE:HY) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, dividends, earnings and risk.

Perma-Pipe International has a net margin of 6.89% compared to Hyster-Yale's net margin of -3.86%. Perma-Pipe International's return on equity of 21.58% beat Hyster-Yale's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Perma-Pipe International	6.89%	21.58%	8.79%
Hyster-Yale	-3.86%	-26.03%	-5.57%

Perma-Pipe International presently has a consensus target price of $37.00, suggesting a potential upside of 30.93%. Hyster-Yale has a consensus target price of $47.50, suggesting a potential upside of 74.31%. Given Hyster-Yale's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Hyster-Yale is more favorable than Perma-Pipe International.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Perma-Pipe International	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Hyster-Yale	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

28.4% of Perma-Pipe International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.5% of Hyster-Yale shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Perma-Pipe International shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 37.8% of Hyster-Yale shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Perma-Pipe International has a beta of 0.63, suggesting that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hyster-Yale has a beta of 1.71, suggesting that its share price is 71% more volatile than the broader market.

Perma-Pipe International has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Hyster-Yale. Hyster-Yale is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Perma-Pipe International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Perma-Pipe International	$210.93M	1.10	$17.03M	$1.90	14.87
Hyster-Yale	$3.77B	0.13	-$60.10M	-$7.26	N/A

In the previous week, Hyster-Yale had 16 more articles in the media than Perma-Pipe International. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Hyster-Yale and 2 mentions for Perma-Pipe International. Perma-Pipe International's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Hyster-Yale's score of 0.82 indicating that Perma-Pipe International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Perma-Pipe International	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Hyster-Yale	2 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Perma-Pipe International beats Hyster-Yale on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Perma-Pipe International News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PPIH and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

PPIH vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Perma-Pipe International	Machinery Industry	Industrials Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$235.77M	$10.36B	$10.12B	$12.20B
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.32%	2.91%	4.53%
P/E Ratio	14.87	32.81	32.32	30.64
Price / Sales	1.10	2.74	3.17	5.80
Price / Cash	10.61	18.11	19.67	22.49
Price / Book	2.52	3.16	3.76	3.76
Net Income	$17.03M	$373.63M	$612.90M	$390.95M
7 Day Performance	-0.56%	1.65%	0.88%	-0.34%
1 Month Performance	-3.45%	-1.90%	-1.78%	-5.79%
1 Year Performance	16.58%	1.87%	2.26%	-5.71%

Perma-Pipe International Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
PPIH Perma-Pipe International	3.6647 of 5 stars	$28.26 -1.8%	$37.00 +30.9%	N/A	$235.77M	$210.93M	14.87	909
KRNT Kornit Digital	3.0448 of 5 stars	$17.47 -2.2%	$21.00 +20.2%	N/A	$767.82M	$215.85M	N/A	633	Upcoming Earnings
ELMT Elmet Group	3.5418 of 5 stars	$19.38 -11.9%	$27.50 +41.9%	N/A	$669.80M	N/A	N/A	533	News Coverage Earnings Report Analyst Forecast High Trading Volume
SSYS Stratasys	2.7356 of 5 stars	$6.56 -1.8%	$12.33 +88.0%	N/A	$588.39M	$551.10M	N/A	1,757	Trending News Earnings Report Analyst Forecast
CMCO Columbus McKinnon	3.9685 of 5 stars	$20.32 +3.3%	$23.50 +15.6%	N/A	$568.99M	$1.19B	N/A	7,300	Gap Down

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:PPIH) was last updated on 11/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Perma-Pipe International (PPIH) Competitors

PPIH vs. KRNT, ELMT, SSYS, CMCO, and HY

How does Perma-Pipe International compare to Kornit Digital?

Summary

How does Perma-Pipe International compare to Elmet Group?

Summary

How does Perma-Pipe International compare to Stratasys?

Summary

How does Perma-Pipe International compare to Columbus McKinnon?

Summary

How does Perma-Pipe International compare to Hyster-Yale?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PPIH vs. The Competition

Perma-Pipe International Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Perma-Pipe International (PPIH) Competitors

PPIH vs. KRNT, ELMT, SSYS, CMCO, and HY

How does Perma-Pipe International compare to Kornit Digital?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in PPIH or KRNT?

Which has more risk & volatility, PPIH or KRNT?

Do analysts recommend PPIH or KRNT?

Does the media refer more to PPIH or KRNT?

Is PPIH or KRNT more profitable?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, PPIH or KRNT?

Summary

How does Perma-Pipe International compare to Elmet Group?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in PPIH or ELMT?

Does the media prefer PPIH or ELMT?

Do analysts recommend PPIH or ELMT?

Is PPIH or ELMT more profitable?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, PPIH or ELMT?

Summary

How does Perma-Pipe International compare to Stratasys?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of PPIH or SSYS?

Which has more volatility and risk, PPIH or SSYS?

Does the media favor PPIH or SSYS?

Is PPIH or SSYS more profitable?

Do analysts prefer PPIH or SSYS?

Which has better earnings and valuation, PPIH or SSYS?

Summary

How does Perma-Pipe International compare to Columbus McKinnon?

Which has more risk and volatility, PPIH or CMCO?

Do analysts prefer PPIH or CMCO?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, PPIH or CMCO?

Does the media refer more to PPIH or CMCO?

Is PPIH or CMCO more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of PPIH or CMCO?

Summary

How does Perma-Pipe International compare to Hyster-Yale?

Is PPIH or HY more profitable?

Do analysts prefer PPIH or HY?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in PPIH or HY?

Which has more risk & volatility, PPIH or HY?

Which has better earnings & valuation, PPIH or HY?

Does the media refer more to PPIH or HY?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PPIH vs. The Competition

Perma-Pipe International Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools