Free Trial
Your Portfolio Deserves Better! MarketBeat All Access for Just $149
Upgrade Now
Claim MarketBeat All Access Sale Promotion

PS International Group (PSIG) Competitors

PS International Group logo
$7.81 +0.10 (+1.26%)
As of 02:58 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

PSIG vs. GASS, KNOP, DSX, SHIP, and ULH

Should you buy PS International Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares PS International Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with PS International Group include StealthGas (GASS), KNOT Offshore Partners (KNOP), Diana Shipping (DSX), Seanergy Maritime (SHIP), and Universal Logistics (ULH). These companies are all part of the "transportation" industry.

How does PS International Group compare to StealthGas?

StealthGas (NASDAQ:GASS) and PS International Group (NASDAQ:PSIG) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment and profitability.

66.3% of StealthGas shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.7% of PS International Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.1% of StealthGas shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 69.0% of PS International Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

StealthGas has a beta of 0.25, meaning that its stock price is 75% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PS International Group has a beta of -0.24, meaning that its stock price is 124% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, StealthGas and StealthGas both had 1 articles in the media. StealthGas' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled PS International Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
StealthGas
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
PS International Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
StealthGas
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
PS International Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

StealthGas has higher revenue and earnings than PS International Group.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
StealthGas$173.16M2.13$60.65M$1.645.99
PS International GroupN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

StealthGas has a net margin of 35.03% compared to PS International Group's net margin of 0.00%. StealthGas' return on equity of 9.08% beat PS International Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
StealthGas35.03% 9.08% 8.52%
PS International Group N/A N/A N/A

Summary

StealthGas beats PS International Group on 8 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PS International Group compare to KNOT Offshore Partners?

PS International Group (NASDAQ:PSIG) and KNOT Offshore Partners (NYSE:KNOP) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, earnings, risk and dividends.

In the previous week, KNOT Offshore Partners had 1 more articles in the media than PS International Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for KNOT Offshore Partners and 1 mentions for PS International Group. PS International Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled KNOT Offshore Partners'average media sentiment score.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
PS International Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
KNOT Offshore Partners
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

29.7% of PS International Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.8% of KNOT Offshore Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 69.0% of PS International Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

KNOT Offshore Partners has a consensus price target of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 19.40%. Given KNOT Offshore Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe KNOT Offshore Partners is more favorable than PS International Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PS International Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
KNOT Offshore Partners
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60

KNOT Offshore Partners has higher revenue and earnings than PS International Group.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PS International GroupN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
KNOT Offshore Partners$364.44M1.08$22.96M$0.6817.24

PS International Group has a beta of -0.24, meaning that its share price is 124% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, KNOT Offshore Partners has a beta of -0.07, meaning that its share price is 107% less volatile than the broader market.

KNOT Offshore Partners has a net margin of 6.38% compared to PS International Group's net margin of 0.00%. KNOT Offshore Partners' return on equity of 7.30% beat PS International Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PS International GroupN/A N/A N/A
KNOT Offshore Partners 6.38%7.30%2.35%

Summary

KNOT Offshore Partners beats PS International Group on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PS International Group compare to Diana Shipping?

PS International Group (NASDAQ:PSIG) and Diana Shipping (NYSE:DSX) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Diana Shipping has a net margin of 8.35% compared to PS International Group's net margin of 0.00%. Diana Shipping's return on equity of 3.60% beat PS International Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PS International GroupN/A N/A N/A
Diana Shipping 8.35%3.60%1.54%

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PS International Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Diana Shipping
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, Diana Shipping had 4 more articles in the media than PS International Group. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Diana Shipping and 1 mentions for PS International Group. PS International Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Diana Shipping's score of -0.17 indicating that PS International Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
PS International Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Diana Shipping
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Diana Shipping has higher revenue and earnings than PS International Group.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PS International GroupN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Diana Shipping$213.54M1.51$17.83M$0.1123.68

PS International Group has a beta of -0.24, meaning that its share price is 124% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Diana Shipping has a beta of 0.53, meaning that its share price is 47% less volatile than the broader market.

29.7% of PS International Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.7% of Diana Shipping shares are owned by institutional investors. 69.0% of PS International Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Diana Shipping beats PS International Group on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PS International Group compare to Seanergy Maritime?

PS International Group (NASDAQ:PSIG) and Seanergy Maritime (NASDAQ:SHIP) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability and valuation.

In the previous week, Seanergy Maritime had 2 more articles in the media than PS International Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Seanergy Maritime and 1 mentions for PS International Group. Seanergy Maritime's average media sentiment score of 0.29 beat PS International Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Seanergy Maritime is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
PS International Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Seanergy Maritime
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Seanergy Maritime has higher revenue and earnings than PS International Group.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PS International GroupN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Seanergy Maritime$158.10M2.00$21.24M$1.0015.16

Seanergy Maritime has a consensus price target of $17.00, indicating a potential upside of 12.17%. Given Seanergy Maritime's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Seanergy Maritime is more favorable than PS International Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PS International Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Seanergy Maritime
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

29.7% of PS International Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.4% of Seanergy Maritime shares are owned by institutional investors. 69.0% of PS International Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.7% of Seanergy Maritime shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Seanergy Maritime has a net margin of 13.08% compared to PS International Group's net margin of 0.00%. Seanergy Maritime's return on equity of 8.35% beat PS International Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PS International GroupN/A N/A N/A
Seanergy Maritime 13.08%8.35%3.71%

PS International Group has a beta of -0.24, indicating that its stock price is 124% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Seanergy Maritime has a beta of 0.94, indicating that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Seanergy Maritime beats PS International Group on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PS International Group compare to Universal Logistics?

PS International Group (NASDAQ:PSIG) and Universal Logistics (NASDAQ:ULH) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and dividends.

PS International Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Universal Logistics' net margin of -4.29%. Universal Logistics' return on equity of 2.65% beat PS International Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PS International GroupN/A N/A N/A
Universal Logistics -4.29%2.65%0.84%

PS International Group has a beta of -0.24, indicating that its stock price is 124% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Universal Logistics has a beta of 0.79, indicating that its stock price is 21% less volatile than the broader market.

29.7% of PS International Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.5% of Universal Logistics shares are owned by institutional investors. 69.0% of PS International Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 73.5% of Universal Logistics shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

PS International Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Universal Logistics.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PS International GroupN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Universal Logistics$1.56B0.24-$99.87M-$2.51N/A

In the previous week, Universal Logistics had 1 more articles in the media than PS International Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Universal Logistics and 1 mentions for PS International Group. PS International Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Universal Logistics' score of -0.40 indicating that PS International Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
PS International Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Universal Logistics
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Universal Logistics has a consensus target price of $17.00, suggesting a potential upside of 19.68%. Given Universal Logistics' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Universal Logistics is more favorable than PS International Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PS International Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Universal Logistics
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67

Summary

Universal Logistics beats PS International Group on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get PS International Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PSIG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PSIG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PSIG vs. The Competition

MetricPS International GroupTRANS IndustryTransportation SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$120.16M$6.80B$8.42B$12.33B
Dividend YieldN/A2.64%955.91%5.33%
P/E RatioN/A18.6823.1025.70
Price / SalesN/A1.936.2799.36
Price / CashN/A9.428.3956.16
Price / BookN/A2.432.187.04
Net IncomeN/A$257.31M$537.07M$335.04M
7 Day Performance7.77%2.62%2.70%2.69%
1 Month Performance26.42%-9.10%0.90%1.49%
1 Year Performance198.94%1.04%38.56%35.72%

PS International Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PSIG
PS International Group
0.4052 of 5 stars
$7.81
+1.3%
N/A+180.7%$119.98MN/AN/A33
GASS
StealthGas
1.6112 of 5 stars
$10.26
+1.7%
N/A+91.7%$378.54M$173.16M6.26N/A
KNOP
KNOT Offshore Partners
3.9589 of 5 stars
$10.85
+0.7%
$14.00
+29.0%
+78.3%$362.86M$364.44M15.96640
DSX
Diana Shipping
1.6047 of 5 stars
$2.76
+0.3%
N/A+76.2%$339.74M$213.54M25.07820
SHIP
Seanergy Maritime
3.8783 of 5 stars
$16.03
+0.3%
$17.00
+6.1%
+157.3%$334.23M$158.10M16.0350

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:PSIG) was last updated on 5/22/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners