SPAR Group Competitors

SPAR Group (NASDAQ:SGRP) and MOGU (NYSE:MOGU) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation and risk.

Risk & Volatility

SPAR Group has a beta of 1.27, indicating that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, MOGU has a beta of 0.93, indicating that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares SPAR Group and MOGU's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings for SPAR Group and MOGU, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

MOGU has a consensus target price of $2.80, indicating a potential upside of 87.92%. Given MOGU's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe MOGU is more favorable than SPAR Group.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares SPAR Group and MOGU's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

SPAR Group has higher revenue and earnings than MOGU.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

6.9% of SPAR Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.9% of MOGU shares are owned by institutional investors. 61.1% of SPAR Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

SPAR Group beats MOGU on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

SPAR Group (NASDAQ:SGRP) and ServiceSource International (NASDAQ:SREV) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares SPAR Group and ServiceSource International's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

SPAR Group has higher revenue and earnings than ServiceSource International.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for SPAR Group and ServiceSource International, as reported by MarketBeat.

ServiceSource International has a consensus price target of $2.00, suggesting a potential upside of 45.99%. Given ServiceSource International's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe ServiceSource International is more favorable than SPAR Group.

Risk and Volatility

SPAR Group has a beta of 1.27, meaning that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ServiceSource International has a beta of 1.99, meaning that its stock price is 99% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

6.9% of SPAR Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.8% of ServiceSource International shares are held by institutional investors. 61.1% of SPAR Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.5% of ServiceSource International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares SPAR Group and ServiceSource International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

SPAR Group beats ServiceSource International on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

SPAR Group (NASDAQ:SGRP) and Steel Connect (NASDAQ:STCN) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings and profitability.

Risk and Volatility

SPAR Group has a beta of 1.27, indicating that its share price is 27% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Steel Connect has a beta of 1.04, indicating that its share price is 4% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares SPAR Group and Steel Connect's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

SPAR Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Steel Connect.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for SPAR Group and Steel Connect, as provided by MarketBeat.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

6.9% of SPAR Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.6% of Steel Connect shares are owned by institutional investors. 61.1% of SPAR Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 11.4% of Steel Connect shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares SPAR Group and Steel Connect's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

SPAR Group beats Steel Connect on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

SPAR Group (NASDAQ:SGRP) and China Customer Relations Centers (NASDAQ:CCRC) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, dividends, earnings, valuation and institutional ownership.

Risk and Volatility

SPAR Group has a beta of 1.27, suggesting that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, China Customer Relations Centers has a beta of 0.44, suggesting that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares SPAR Group and China Customer Relations Centers' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

China Customer Relations Centers has lower revenue, but higher earnings than SPAR Group.

Profitability

This table compares SPAR Group and China Customer Relations Centers' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for SPAR Group and China Customer Relations Centers, as provided by MarketBeat.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

6.9% of SPAR Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of China Customer Relations Centers shares are held by institutional investors. 61.1% of SPAR Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

SPAR Group beats China Customer Relations Centers on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Heritage Global (NASDAQ:HGBL) and SPAR Group (NASDAQ:SGRP) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk and earnings.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Heritage Global and SPAR Group's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Heritage Global has higher earnings, but lower revenue than SPAR Group.

Profitability

This table compares Heritage Global and SPAR Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Heritage Global and SPAR Group, as provided by MarketBeat.

Heritage Global presently has a consensus target price of $4.50, indicating a potential upside of 49.01%. Given Heritage Global's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Heritage Global is more favorable than SPAR Group.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

1.3% of Heritage Global shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.9% of SPAR Group shares are held by institutional investors. 26.4% of Heritage Global shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 61.1% of SPAR Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility and Risk

Heritage Global has a beta of 1.54, meaning that its share price is 54% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, SPAR Group has a beta of 1.27, meaning that its share price is 27% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Heritage Global beats SPAR Group on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Marchex (NASDAQ:MCHX) and SPAR Group (NASDAQ:SGRP) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and dividends.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Marchex and SPAR Group's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

SPAR Group has higher revenue and earnings than Marchex.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Marchex and SPAR Group, as reported by MarketBeat.

Marchex presently has a consensus target price of $4.3750, suggesting a potential upside of 68.27%. Given Marchex's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Marchex is more favorable than SPAR Group.

Volatility and Risk

Marchex has a beta of 1.85, indicating that its share price is 85% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, SPAR Group has a beta of 1.27, indicating that its share price is 27% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

66.3% of Marchex shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.9% of SPAR Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.5% of Marchex shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 61.1% of SPAR Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Marchex and SPAR Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

SPAR Group beats Marchex on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.