Shenandoah Telecommunications Competitors

PLDT (NYSE:PHI) and Shenandoah Telecommunications (NASDAQ:SHEN) are both mid-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends, valuation, risk and institutional ownership.

Risk & Volatility

PLDT has a beta of 0.34, meaning that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Shenandoah Telecommunications has a beta of 0.33, meaning that its stock price is 67% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

3.2% of PLDT shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.4% of Shenandoah Telecommunications shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.3% of Shenandoah Telecommunications shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for PLDT and Shenandoah Telecommunications, as reported by MarketBeat.

Shenandoah Telecommunications has a consensus target price of $49.50, suggesting a potential upside of 9.68%. Given Shenandoah Telecommunications' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Shenandoah Telecommunications is more favorable than PLDT.

Profitability

This table compares PLDT and Shenandoah Telecommunications' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares PLDT and Shenandoah Telecommunications' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

PLDT has higher revenue and earnings than Shenandoah Telecommunications. PLDT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Shenandoah Telecommunications, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

PLDT pays an annual dividend of $1.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Shenandoah Telecommunications pays an annual dividend of $0.34 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. PLDT pays out 46.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Shenandoah Telecommunications pays out 30.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. PLDT has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. PLDT is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

PLDT beats Shenandoah Telecommunications on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

KT (NYSE:KT) and Shenandoah Telecommunications (NASDAQ:SHEN) are both mid-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership and dividends.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares KT and Shenandoah Telecommunications' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

KT has higher revenue and earnings than Shenandoah Telecommunications. KT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Shenandoah Telecommunications, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

KT has a beta of 0.84, meaning that its share price is 16% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Shenandoah Telecommunications has a beta of 0.33, meaning that its share price is 67% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares KT and Shenandoah Telecommunications' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings for KT and Shenandoah Telecommunications, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Shenandoah Telecommunications has a consensus target price of $49.50, indicating a potential upside of 9.68%. Given Shenandoah Telecommunications' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Shenandoah Telecommunications is more favorable than KT.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

26.2% of KT shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.4% of Shenandoah Telecommunications shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of KT shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of Shenandoah Telecommunications shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

KT pays an annual dividend of $0.37 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Shenandoah Telecommunications pays an annual dividend of $0.34 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. KT pays out 34.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Shenandoah Telecommunications pays out 30.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Shenandoah Telecommunications beats KT on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Shenandoah Telecommunications (NASDAQ:SHEN) and TIM (NYSE:TIMB) are both mid-cap utilities companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, institutional ownership and earnings.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Shenandoah Telecommunications and TIM's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

TIM has higher revenue and earnings than Shenandoah Telecommunications. TIM is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Shenandoah Telecommunications, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Shenandoah Telecommunications has a beta of 0.33, meaning that its stock price is 67% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, TIM has a beta of 1.01, meaning that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Shenandoah Telecommunications and TIM's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Shenandoah Telecommunications and TIM, as reported by MarketBeat.

Shenandoah Telecommunications currently has a consensus target price of $49.50, indicating a potential upside of 9.68%. Given Shenandoah Telecommunications' higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Shenandoah Telecommunications is more favorable than TIM.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

53.4% of Shenandoah Telecommunications shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.9% of TIM shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.3% of Shenandoah Telecommunications shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

Shenandoah Telecommunications pays an annual dividend of $0.34 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. TIM pays an annual dividend of $0.14 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Shenandoah Telecommunications pays out 30.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. TIM pays out 13.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. TIM is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Shenandoah Telecommunications (NASDAQ:SHEN) and Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S. (NYSE:TKC) are both mid-cap utilities companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, institutional ownership and earnings.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Shenandoah Telecommunications and Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S.'s gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S. has higher revenue and earnings than Shenandoah Telecommunications. Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S. is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Shenandoah Telecommunications, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Shenandoah Telecommunications has a beta of 0.33, meaning that its stock price is 67% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S. has a beta of 0.61, meaning that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Shenandoah Telecommunications and Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S.'s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Shenandoah Telecommunications and Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S., as reported by MarketBeat.

Shenandoah Telecommunications currently has a consensus target price of $49.50, indicating a potential upside of 9.68%. Given Shenandoah Telecommunications' higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Shenandoah Telecommunications is more favorable than Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S..

Institutional & Insider Ownership

53.4% of Shenandoah Telecommunications shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.9% of Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S. shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.3% of Shenandoah Telecommunications shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

Shenandoah Telecommunications pays an annual dividend of $0.34 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S. pays an annual dividend of $0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Shenandoah Telecommunications pays out 30.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S. pays out 19.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S. is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S. beats Shenandoah Telecommunications on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Shenandoah Telecommunications (NASDAQ:SHEN) and Vonage (NASDAQ:VG) are both mid-cap utilities companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, institutional ownership and earnings.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Shenandoah Telecommunications and Vonage's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Shenandoah Telecommunications has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Vonage. Shenandoah Telecommunications is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vonage, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

Shenandoah Telecommunications has a beta of 0.33, suggesting that its stock price is 67% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Vonage has a beta of 0.62, suggesting that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Shenandoah Telecommunications and Vonage's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Shenandoah Telecommunications and Vonage, as reported by MarketBeat.

Shenandoah Telecommunications currently has a consensus target price of $49.50, indicating a potential upside of 9.68%. Vonage has a consensus target price of $13.80, indicating a potential downside of 1.57%. Given Shenandoah Telecommunications' higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Shenandoah Telecommunications is more favorable than Vonage.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

53.4% of Shenandoah Telecommunications shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.8% of Vonage shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.3% of Shenandoah Telecommunications shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 6.5% of Vonage shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Shenandoah Telecommunications (NASDAQ:SHEN) and Telecom Argentina (NYSE:TEO) are both mid-cap utilities companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, institutional ownership and earnings.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Shenandoah Telecommunications and Telecom Argentina's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Shenandoah Telecommunications has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Telecom Argentina. Telecom Argentina is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Shenandoah Telecommunications, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Shenandoah Telecommunications has a beta of 0.33, meaning that its stock price is 67% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Telecom Argentina has a beta of 0.43, meaning that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Shenandoah Telecommunications and Telecom Argentina's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Shenandoah Telecommunications and Telecom Argentina, as reported by MarketBeat.

Shenandoah Telecommunications currently has a consensus target price of $49.50, indicating a potential upside of 9.68%. Telecom Argentina has a consensus target price of $7.00, indicating a potential upside of 20.27%. Given Telecom Argentina's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Telecom Argentina is more favorable than Shenandoah Telecommunications.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

53.4% of Shenandoah Telecommunications shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.0% of Telecom Argentina shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.3% of Shenandoah Telecommunications shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Telecom Argentina shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

Shenandoah Telecommunications pays an annual dividend of $0.34 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Telecom Argentina pays an annual dividend of $0.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. Shenandoah Telecommunications pays out 30.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Telecom Argentina pays out -205.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Telecom Argentina is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Shenandoah Telecommunications beats Telecom Argentina on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.