Shenandoah Telecommunications (SHEN) Competitors

Crown Castle has higher revenue and earnings than Shenandoah Telecommunications. Shenandoah Telecommunications is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Crown Castle, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Crown Castle has a beta of 0.93, suggesting that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Shenandoah Telecommunications has a beta of 0.66, suggesting that its share price is 34% less volatile than the broader market.

Crown Castle has a net margin of 25.13% compared to Shenandoah Telecommunications' net margin of -11.35%. Shenandoah Telecommunications' return on equity of -4.64% beat Crown Castle's return on equity.

Crown Castle pays an annual dividend of $4.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Shenandoah Telecommunications pays an annual dividend of $0.11 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Crown Castle pays out 175.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Shenandoah Telecommunications pays out -13.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Shenandoah Telecommunications has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

90.8% of Crown Castle shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.0% of Shenandoah Telecommunications shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Crown Castle shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.0% of Shenandoah Telecommunications shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Crown Castle had 7 more articles in the media than Shenandoah Telecommunications. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Crown Castle and 2 mentions for Shenandoah Telecommunications. Shenandoah Telecommunications' average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat Crown Castle's score of 0.95 indicating that Shenandoah Telecommunications is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Crown Castle currently has a consensus price target of $98.52, indicating a potential upside of 10.98%. Shenandoah Telecommunications has a consensus price target of $27.50, indicating a potential upside of 74.16%. Given Shenandoah Telecommunications' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Shenandoah Telecommunications is more favorable than Crown Castle.

SBA Communications has a net margin of 35.66% compared to Shenandoah Telecommunications' net margin of -11.35%. Shenandoah Telecommunications' return on equity of -4.64% beat SBA Communications' return on equity.

Shenandoah Telecommunications pays an annual dividend of $0.11 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. SBA Communications pays an annual dividend of $5.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Shenandoah Telecommunications pays out -13.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. SBA Communications pays out 52.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Shenandoah Telecommunications has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and SBA Communications has increased its dividend for 6 consecutive years. SBA Communications is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Shenandoah Telecommunications and Shenandoah Telecommunications both had 2 articles in the media. Shenandoah Telecommunications' average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat SBA Communications' score of 0.49 indicating that Shenandoah Telecommunications is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Shenandoah Telecommunications presently has a consensus price target of $27.50, indicating a potential upside of 74.16%. SBA Communications has a consensus price target of $237.22, indicating a potential upside of 20.67%. Given Shenandoah Telecommunications' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Shenandoah Telecommunications is more favorable than SBA Communications.

Shenandoah Telecommunications has a beta of 0.66, suggesting that its share price is 34% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SBA Communications has a beta of 0.99, suggesting that its share price is 1% less volatile than the broader market.

SBA Communications has higher revenue and earnings than Shenandoah Telecommunications. Shenandoah Telecommunications is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SBA Communications, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

62.0% of Shenandoah Telecommunications shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.4% of SBA Communications shares are held by institutional investors. 5.0% of Shenandoah Telecommunications shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.5% of SBA Communications shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

BlackBerry presently has a consensus target price of $4.88, suggesting a potential downside of 52.04%. Shenandoah Telecommunications has a consensus target price of $27.50, suggesting a potential upside of 74.16%. Given Shenandoah Telecommunications' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Shenandoah Telecommunications is more favorable than BlackBerry.

BlackBerry has a net margin of 9.69% compared to Shenandoah Telecommunications' net margin of -11.35%. BlackBerry's return on equity of 10.09% beat Shenandoah Telecommunications' return on equity.

In the previous week, BlackBerry had 1 more articles in the media than Shenandoah Telecommunications. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for BlackBerry and 2 mentions for Shenandoah Telecommunications. Shenandoah Telecommunications' average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat BlackBerry's score of 0.69 indicating that Shenandoah Telecommunications is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

BlackBerry has higher revenue and earnings than Shenandoah Telecommunications. Shenandoah Telecommunications is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BlackBerry, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

54.5% of BlackBerry shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.0% of Shenandoah Telecommunications shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of BlackBerry shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.0% of Shenandoah Telecommunications shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

BlackBerry has a beta of 2.29, meaning that its stock price is 129% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Shenandoah Telecommunications has a beta of 0.66, meaning that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market.

Shenandoah Telecommunications has a beta of 0.66, indicating that its share price is 34% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Telephone and Data Systems has a beta of 0.28, indicating that its share price is 72% less volatile than the broader market.

Telephone and Data Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Shenandoah Telecommunications. Shenandoah Telecommunications is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Telephone and Data Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Shenandoah Telecommunications pays an annual dividend of $0.11 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Telephone and Data Systems pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Shenandoah Telecommunications pays out -13.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Telephone and Data Systems pays out 30.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Shenandoah Telecommunications has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Shenandoah Telecommunications is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

62.0% of Shenandoah Telecommunications shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.0% of Telephone and Data Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.0% of Shenandoah Telecommunications shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 14.2% of Telephone and Data Systems shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Telephone and Data Systems had 3 more articles in the media than Shenandoah Telecommunications. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Telephone and Data Systems and 2 mentions for Shenandoah Telecommunications. Telephone and Data Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.34 beat Shenandoah Telecommunications' score of 1.32 indicating that Telephone and Data Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Telephone and Data Systems has a net margin of 6.15% compared to Shenandoah Telecommunications' net margin of -11.35%. Telephone and Data Systems' return on equity of 5.54% beat Shenandoah Telecommunications' return on equity.

Shenandoah Telecommunications currently has a consensus price target of $27.50, indicating a potential upside of 74.16%. Telephone and Data Systems has a consensus price target of $53.33, indicating a potential upside of 36.48%. Given Shenandoah Telecommunications' higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Shenandoah Telecommunications is more favorable than Telephone and Data Systems.