IDT (IDT) Competitors

59.3% of IDT shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.1% of Verizon Communications shares are held by institutional investors. 25.4% of IDT shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Verizon Communications shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Verizon Communications had 45 more articles in the media than IDT. MarketBeat recorded 50 mentions for Verizon Communications and 5 mentions for IDT. Verizon Communications' average media sentiment score of 1.19 beat IDT's score of 0.29 indicating that Verizon Communications is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Verizon Communications has a net margin of 12.46% compared to IDT's net margin of 6.49%. IDT's return on equity of 25.97% beat Verizon Communications' return on equity.

Verizon Communications has higher revenue and earnings than IDT. Verizon Communications is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than IDT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

IDT has a beta of 0.65, suggesting that its share price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Verizon Communications has a beta of 0.24, suggesting that its share price is 76% less volatile than the broader market.

IDT pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Verizon Communications pays an annual dividend of $2.83 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. IDT pays out 8.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Verizon Communications pays out 69.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. IDT has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Verizon Communications has raised its dividend for 20 consecutive years. Verizon Communications is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Verizon Communications has a consensus target price of $50.59, suggesting a potential upside of 5.75%. Given Verizon Communications' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Verizon Communications is more favorable than IDT.

AT&T currently has a consensus target price of $30.55, indicating a potential upside of 23.17%. Given AT&T's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe AT&T is more favorable than IDT.

AT&T has a beta of 0.23, suggesting that its stock price is 77% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, IDT has a beta of 0.65, suggesting that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market.

AT&T pays an annual dividend of $1.11 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.5%. IDT pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. AT&T pays out 37.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. IDT pays out 8.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. IDT has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

In the previous week, AT&T had 26 more articles in the media than IDT. MarketBeat recorded 31 mentions for AT&T and 5 mentions for IDT. AT&T's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat IDT's score of 0.29 indicating that AT&T is being referred to more favorably in the media.

57.1% of AT&T shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.3% of IDT shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of AT&T shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 25.4% of IDT shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

AT&T has a net margin of 16.94% compared to IDT's net margin of 6.49%. IDT's return on equity of 25.97% beat AT&T's return on equity.

AT&T has higher revenue and earnings than IDT. AT&T is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than IDT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

IDT has a net margin of 6.49% compared to Lumen Technologies' net margin of -14.34%. IDT's return on equity of 25.97% beat Lumen Technologies' return on equity.

59.3% of IDT shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.2% of Lumen Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 25.4% of IDT shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of Lumen Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

IDT has a beta of 0.65, suggesting that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lumen Technologies has a beta of 1.65, suggesting that its stock price is 65% more volatile than the broader market.

IDT pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Lumen Technologies pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.1%. IDT pays out 8.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lumen Technologies pays out -57.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. IDT has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Lumen Technologies is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, IDT had 1 more articles in the media than Lumen Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for IDT and 4 mentions for Lumen Technologies. Lumen Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat IDT's score of 0.29 indicating that Lumen Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Lumen Technologies has a consensus price target of $7.91, indicating a potential downside of 27.91%. Given Lumen Technologies' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Lumen Technologies is more favorable than IDT.

IDT has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Lumen Technologies. Lumen Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than IDT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, VEON had 2 more articles in the media than IDT. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for VEON and 5 mentions for IDT. VEON's average media sentiment score of 0.49 beat IDT's score of 0.29 indicating that VEON is being referred to more favorably in the media.

VEON has higher revenue and earnings than IDT. VEON is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than IDT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

VEON has a net margin of 11.65% compared to IDT's net margin of 6.49%. VEON's return on equity of 44.43% beat IDT's return on equity.

VEON has a beta of 1.61, meaning that its stock price is 61% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, IDT has a beta of 0.65, meaning that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market.

21.3% of VEON shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.3% of IDT shares are held by institutional investors. 25.4% of IDT shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

VEON currently has a consensus target price of $67.00, suggesting a potential upside of 19.34%. Given VEON's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe VEON is more favorable than IDT.