VEON Competitors

VEON (NASDAQ:VEON) and T-Mobile US (NASDAQ:TMUS) are both utilities companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares VEON and T-Mobile US's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

T-Mobile US has higher revenue and earnings than VEON. VEON is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than T-Mobile US, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

15.7% of VEON shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.5% of T-Mobile US shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of T-Mobile US shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for VEON and T-Mobile US, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

VEON currently has a consensus price target of $1.90, indicating a potential upside of 6.74%. T-Mobile US has a consensus price target of $141.7083, indicating a potential upside of 18.12%. Given T-Mobile US's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe T-Mobile US is more favorable than VEON.

Risk and Volatility

VEON has a beta of 1.31, meaning that its share price is 31% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, T-Mobile US has a beta of 0.55, meaning that its share price is 45% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares VEON and T-Mobile US's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

T-Mobile US beats VEON on 13 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Vodafone Group (NASDAQ:VOD) and VEON (NASDAQ:VEON) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, risk, earnings and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares Vodafone Group and VEON's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Vodafone Group and VEON's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

VEON has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Vodafone Group. VEON is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vodafone Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Vodafone Group has a beta of 0.97, suggesting that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, VEON has a beta of 1.31, suggesting that its stock price is 31% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

8.3% of Vodafone Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.7% of VEON shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Vodafone Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Vodafone Group and VEON, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Vodafone Group currently has a consensus target price of $16.00, indicating a potential downside of 6.87%. VEON has a consensus target price of $1.90, indicating a potential upside of 6.74%. Given VEON's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe VEON is more favorable than Vodafone Group.

Summary

Vodafone Group beats VEON on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Chunghwa Telecom (NYSE:CHT) and VEON (NASDAQ:VEON) are both utilities companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Chunghwa Telecom and VEON's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Chunghwa Telecom has higher earnings, but lower revenue than VEON. VEON is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chunghwa Telecom, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Chunghwa Telecom and VEON's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

2.8% of Chunghwa Telecom shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.7% of VEON shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Chunghwa Telecom shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Chunghwa Telecom and VEON, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

VEON has a consensus price target of $1.90, suggesting a potential upside of 6.74%. Given VEON's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe VEON is more favorable than Chunghwa Telecom.

Risk and Volatility

Chunghwa Telecom has a beta of 0.06, suggesting that its share price is 94% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, VEON has a beta of 1.31, suggesting that its share price is 31% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Chunghwa Telecom beats VEON on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

VEON (NASDAQ:VEON) and TELUS (NYSE:TU) are both utilities companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares VEON and TELUS's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

15.7% of VEON shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 49.5% of TELUS shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

VEON has a beta of 1.31, suggesting that its stock price is 31% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, TELUS has a beta of 0.71, suggesting that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations for VEON and TELUS, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

VEON presently has a consensus price target of $1.90, indicating a potential upside of 6.74%. TELUS has a consensus price target of $28.2857, indicating a potential upside of 41.15%. Given TELUS's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe TELUS is more favorable than VEON.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares VEON and TELUS's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

TELUS has higher revenue and earnings than VEON. VEON is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TELUS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

TELUS beats VEON on 12 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

VEON (NASDAQ:VEON) and China Unicom (Hong Kong) (NYSE:CHU) are both utilities companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and earnings.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for VEON and China Unicom (Hong Kong), as provided by MarketBeat.com.

VEON presently has a consensus price target of $1.90, suggesting a potential upside of 6.74%. Given VEON's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe VEON is more favorable than China Unicom (Hong Kong).

Profitability

This table compares VEON and China Unicom (Hong Kong)'s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

15.7% of VEON shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.9% of China Unicom (Hong Kong) shares are owned by institutional investors. 77.5% of China Unicom (Hong Kong) shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

VEON has a beta of 1.31, meaning that its share price is 31% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, China Unicom (Hong Kong) has a beta of 1.07, meaning that its share price is 7% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares VEON and China Unicom (Hong Kong)'s top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

China Unicom (Hong Kong) has higher revenue and earnings than VEON. VEON is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Unicom (Hong Kong), indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

China Unicom (Hong Kong) beats VEON on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

SK Telecom Co.,Ltd (NYSE:SKM) and VEON (NASDAQ:VEON) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Volatility and Risk

SK Telecom Co.,Ltd has a beta of 0.88, suggesting that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, VEON has a beta of 1.31, suggesting that its stock price is 31% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for SK Telecom Co.,Ltd and VEON, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

VEON has a consensus price target of $1.90, suggesting a potential upside of 6.74%. Given VEON's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe VEON is more favorable than SK Telecom Co.,Ltd.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

8.1% of SK Telecom Co.,Ltd shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.7% of VEON shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of SK Telecom Co.,Ltd shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares SK Telecom Co.,Ltd and VEON's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

SK Telecom Co.,Ltd has higher revenue and earnings than VEON. VEON is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SK Telecom Co.,Ltd, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares SK Telecom Co.,Ltd and VEON's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

SK Telecom Co.,Ltd beats VEON on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.