Schmitt Industries Competitors

Schmitt Industries (NASDAQ:SMIT) and Danaher (NYSE:DHR) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, profitability and risk.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

18.4% of Schmitt Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 78.0% of Danaher shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.4% of Schmitt Industries shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 11.7% of Danaher shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Schmitt Industries and Danaher's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Schmitt Industries and Danaher's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Danaher has higher revenue and earnings than Schmitt Industries.

Risk & Volatility

Schmitt Industries has a beta of 0.93, suggesting that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Danaher has a beta of 0.72, suggesting that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Schmitt Industries and Danaher, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Danaher has a consensus price target of $237.0714, suggesting a potential upside of 2.03%. Given Danaher's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Danaher is more favorable than Schmitt Industries.

Summary

Danaher beats Schmitt Industries on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Schmitt Industries (NASDAQ:SMIT) and Roper Technologies (NYSE:ROP) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership and earnings.

Volatility and Risk

Schmitt Industries has a beta of 0.93, indicating that its share price is 7% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Roper Technologies has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its share price is 3% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Schmitt Industries and Roper Technologies, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Roper Technologies has a consensus price target of $439.75, suggesting a potential upside of 4.31%. Given Roper Technologies' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Roper Technologies is more favorable than Schmitt Industries.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Schmitt Industries and Roper Technologies' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Roper Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Schmitt Industries.

Profitability

This table compares Schmitt Industries and Roper Technologies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

18.4% of Schmitt Industries shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.7% of Roper Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 18.4% of Schmitt Industries shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Roper Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Roper Technologies beats Schmitt Industries on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

AMETEK (NYSE:AME) and Schmitt Industries (NASDAQ:SMIT) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings and profitability.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares AMETEK and Schmitt Industries' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

AMETEK has higher revenue and earnings than Schmitt Industries.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for AMETEK and Schmitt Industries, as provided by MarketBeat.

AMETEK presently has a consensus price target of $115.2857, indicating a potential downside of 12.19%. Given AMETEK's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe AMETEK is more favorable than Schmitt Industries.

Volatility & Risk

AMETEK has a beta of 1.36, meaning that its share price is 36% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Schmitt Industries has a beta of 0.93, meaning that its share price is 7% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares AMETEK and Schmitt Industries' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

85.7% of AMETEK shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.4% of Schmitt Industries shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of AMETEK shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 18.4% of Schmitt Industries shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

AMETEK beats Schmitt Industries on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Schmitt Industries (NASDAQ:SMIT) and Keysight Technologies (NYSE:KEYS) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, dividends and institutional ownership.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Schmitt Industries and Keysight Technologies' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Keysight Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Schmitt Industries.

Profitability

This table compares Schmitt Industries and Keysight Technologies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility & Risk

Schmitt Industries has a beta of 0.93, indicating that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Keysight Technologies has a beta of 1.04, indicating that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

18.4% of Schmitt Industries shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.9% of Keysight Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 18.4% of Schmitt Industries shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Keysight Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Schmitt Industries and Keysight Technologies, as reported by MarketBeat.

Keysight Technologies has a consensus price target of $149.10, suggesting a potential upside of 1.96%. Given Keysight Technologies' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Keysight Technologies is more favorable than Schmitt Industries.

Summary

Keysight Technologies beats Schmitt Industries on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Fortive (NYSE:FTV) and Schmitt Industries (NASDAQ:SMIT) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Fortive and Schmitt Industries, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Fortive presently has a consensus target price of $77.8462, suggesting a potential upside of 9.70%. Given Fortive's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Fortive is more favorable than Schmitt Industries.

Profitability

This table compares Fortive and Schmitt Industries' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

84.7% of Fortive shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.4% of Schmitt Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.6% of Fortive shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 18.4% of Schmitt Industries shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Fortive and Schmitt Industries' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Fortive has higher revenue and earnings than Schmitt Industries.

Volatility & Risk

Fortive has a beta of 1.14, suggesting that its share price is 14% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Schmitt Industries has a beta of 0.93, suggesting that its share price is 7% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Fortive beats Schmitt Industries on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Cognex (NASDAQ:CGNX) and Schmitt Industries (NASDAQ:SMIT) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.

Volatility and Risk

Cognex has a beta of 1.64, indicating that its stock price is 64% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Schmitt Industries has a beta of 0.93, indicating that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Cognex and Schmitt Industries, as provided by MarketBeat.

Cognex presently has a consensus price target of $68.7778, indicating a potential downside of 19.60%. Given Cognex's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Cognex is more favorable than Schmitt Industries.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Cognex and Schmitt Industries' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Cognex has higher revenue and earnings than Schmitt Industries.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

91.5% of Cognex shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.4% of Schmitt Industries shares are held by institutional investors. 5.2% of Cognex shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 18.4% of Schmitt Industries shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Cognex and Schmitt Industries' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Cognex beats Schmitt Industries on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.