WaFd (WAFD) Competitors

WaFd currently has a consensus target price of $34.80, suggesting a potential downside of 7.90%. Cathay General Bancorp has a consensus target price of $51.75, suggesting a potential downside of 16.01%. Given WaFd's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe WaFd is more favorable than Cathay General Bancorp.

Cathay General Bancorp has lower revenue, but higher earnings than WaFd. WaFd is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cathay General Bancorp, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

83.7% of WaFd shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.0% of Cathay General Bancorp shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of WaFd shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Cathay General Bancorp shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, WaFd had 1 more articles in the media than Cathay General Bancorp. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for WaFd and 4 mentions for Cathay General Bancorp. Cathay General Bancorp's average media sentiment score of 1.15 beat WaFd's score of -0.23 indicating that Cathay General Bancorp is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

WaFd has a beta of 0.84, meaning that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cathay General Bancorp has a beta of 0.86, meaning that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

WaFd pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Cathay General Bancorp pays an annual dividend of $1.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. WaFd pays out 35.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cathay General Bancorp pays out 31.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. WaFd has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. WaFd is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Cathay General Bancorp has a net margin of 23.79% compared to WaFd's net margin of 18.25%. Cathay General Bancorp's return on equity of 11.37% beat WaFd's return on equity.

WaFd presently has a consensus target price of $34.80, indicating a potential downside of 7.90%. First Financial Bancorp. has a consensus target price of $33.00, indicating a potential downside of 1.52%. Given First Financial Bancorp.'s stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe First Financial Bancorp. is more favorable than WaFd.

In the previous week, WaFd had 2 more articles in the media than First Financial Bancorp.. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for WaFd and 3 mentions for First Financial Bancorp.. First Financial Bancorp.'s average media sentiment score of 1.18 beat WaFd's score of -0.23 indicating that First Financial Bancorp. is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

First Financial Bancorp. has lower revenue, but higher earnings than WaFd. First Financial Bancorp. is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than WaFd, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

First Financial Bancorp. has a net margin of 20.92% compared to WaFd's net margin of 18.25%. First Financial Bancorp.'s return on equity of 11.09% beat WaFd's return on equity.

WaFd pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. First Financial Bancorp. pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. WaFd pays out 35.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. First Financial Bancorp. pays out 35.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. WaFd has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and First Financial Bancorp. has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

83.7% of WaFd shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.2% of First Financial Bancorp. shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of WaFd shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of First Financial Bancorp. shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

WaFd has a beta of 0.84, suggesting that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, First Financial Bancorp. has a beta of 0.93, suggesting that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

Fulton Financial has lower revenue, but higher earnings than WaFd. Fulton Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than WaFd, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, WaFd had 3 more articles in the media than Fulton Financial. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for WaFd and 2 mentions for Fulton Financial. Fulton Financial's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat WaFd's score of -0.23 indicating that Fulton Financial is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Fulton Financial has a net margin of 20.85% compared to WaFd's net margin of 18.25%. Fulton Financial's return on equity of 12.69% beat WaFd's return on equity.

WaFd has a beta of 0.84, meaning that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fulton Financial has a beta of 0.8, meaning that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

WaFd pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Fulton Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. WaFd pays out 35.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fulton Financial pays out 36.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. WaFd has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Fulton Financial has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Fulton Financial is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

WaFd currently has a consensus target price of $34.80, indicating a potential downside of 7.90%. Fulton Financial has a consensus target price of $23.00, indicating a potential downside of 5.02%. Given Fulton Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Fulton Financial is more favorable than WaFd.

83.7% of WaFd shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.0% of Fulton Financial shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of WaFd shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Fulton Financial shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, WaFd had 1 more articles in the media than Hancock Whitney. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for WaFd and 4 mentions for Hancock Whitney. Hancock Whitney's average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat WaFd's score of -0.23 indicating that Hancock Whitney is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

83.7% of WaFd shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.2% of Hancock Whitney shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of WaFd shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Hancock Whitney shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Hancock Whitney has a net margin of 21.34% compared to WaFd's net margin of 18.25%. Hancock Whitney's return on equity of 11.20% beat WaFd's return on equity.

WaFd has a beta of 0.84, meaning that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hancock Whitney has a beta of 0.95, meaning that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

WaFd presently has a consensus price target of $34.80, indicating a potential downside of 7.90%. Hancock Whitney has a consensus price target of $79.25, indicating a potential upside of 6.88%. Given Hancock Whitney's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Hancock Whitney is more favorable than WaFd.

WaFd pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Hancock Whitney pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. WaFd pays out 35.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hancock Whitney pays out 41.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. WaFd has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Hancock Whitney has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. WaFd is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Hancock Whitney has higher revenue and earnings than WaFd. WaFd is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hancock Whitney, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.