WaFd (WAFD) Competitors

WaFd has a beta of 0.83, indicating that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, First Financial Bancorp. has a beta of 0.91, indicating that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

WaFd presently has a consensus target price of $36.25, indicating a potential upside of 11.92%. First Financial Bancorp. has a consensus target price of $33.67, indicating a potential upside of 4.91%. Given WaFd's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe WaFd is more favorable than First Financial Bancorp..

WaFd pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. First Financial Bancorp. pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. WaFd pays out 34.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. First Financial Bancorp. pays out 36.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. WaFd has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and First Financial Bancorp. has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. WaFd is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

First Financial Bancorp. has lower revenue, but higher earnings than WaFd. WaFd is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than First Financial Bancorp., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

First Financial Bancorp. has a net margin of 20.77% compared to WaFd's net margin of 18.47%. First Financial Bancorp.'s return on equity of 11.13% beat WaFd's return on equity.

83.7% of WaFd shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.2% of First Financial Bancorp. shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of WaFd shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of First Financial Bancorp. shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, WaFd had 1 more articles in the media than First Financial Bancorp.. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for WaFd and 4 mentions for First Financial Bancorp.. WaFd's average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat First Financial Bancorp.'s score of 0.13 indicating that WaFd is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Fulton Financial has higher revenue and earnings than WaFd. WaFd is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fulton Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Fulton Financial has a beta of 0.78, meaning that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, WaFd has a beta of 0.83, meaning that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

Fulton Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. WaFd pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Fulton Financial pays out 36.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. WaFd pays out 34.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Fulton Financial has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and WaFd has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. WaFd is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Fulton Financial currently has a consensus price target of $24.75, indicating a potential upside of 5.77%. WaFd has a consensus price target of $36.25, indicating a potential upside of 11.92%. Given WaFd's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe WaFd is more favorable than Fulton Financial.

72.0% of Fulton Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.7% of WaFd shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Fulton Financial shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of WaFd shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Fulton Financial has a net margin of 20.63% compared to WaFd's net margin of 18.47%. Fulton Financial's return on equity of 12.68% beat WaFd's return on equity.

In the previous week, Fulton Financial and Fulton Financial both had 5 articles in the media. Fulton Financial's average media sentiment score of 0.73 beat WaFd's score of 0.50 indicating that Fulton Financial is being referred to more favorably in the media.

81.2% of Hancock Whitney shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.7% of WaFd shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Hancock Whitney shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of WaFd shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Hancock Whitney has a net margin of 21.81% compared to WaFd's net margin of 18.47%. Hancock Whitney's return on equity of 11.36% beat WaFd's return on equity.

In the previous week, WaFd had 2 more articles in the media than Hancock Whitney. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for WaFd and 3 mentions for Hancock Whitney. Hancock Whitney's average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat WaFd's score of 0.50 indicating that Hancock Whitney is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Hancock Whitney has higher revenue and earnings than WaFd. WaFd is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hancock Whitney, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Hancock Whitney currently has a consensus target price of $83.78, suggesting a potential upside of 11.78%. WaFd has a consensus target price of $36.25, suggesting a potential upside of 11.92%. Given WaFd's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe WaFd is more favorable than Hancock Whitney.

Hancock Whitney has a beta of 0.94, suggesting that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, WaFd has a beta of 0.83, suggesting that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

Hancock Whitney pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. WaFd pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Hancock Whitney pays out 39.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. WaFd pays out 34.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Hancock Whitney has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and WaFd has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. WaFd is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, WaFd had 5 more articles in the media than Simmons First National. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for WaFd and 0 mentions for Simmons First National. Simmons First National's average media sentiment score of 1.67 beat WaFd's score of 0.50 indicating that Simmons First National is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Simmons First National has a beta of 0.89, suggesting that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, WaFd has a beta of 0.83, suggesting that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

Simmons First National currently has a consensus target price of $25.50, suggesting a potential upside of 11.40%. WaFd has a consensus target price of $36.25, suggesting a potential upside of 11.92%. Given WaFd's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe WaFd is more favorable than Simmons First National.

WaFd has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Simmons First National. Simmons First National is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than WaFd, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Simmons First National pays an annual dividend of $0.86 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. WaFd pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Simmons First National pays out -34.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. WaFd pays out 34.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Simmons First National has raised its dividend for 14 consecutive years and WaFd has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Simmons First National is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

27.6% of Simmons First National shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.7% of WaFd shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Simmons First National shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of WaFd shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

WaFd has a net margin of 18.47% compared to Simmons First National's net margin of -24.64%. WaFd's return on equity of 8.98% beat Simmons First National's return on equity.