WaFd (WAFD) Competitors

83.7% of WaFd shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.0% of Cathay General Bancorp shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of WaFd shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Cathay General Bancorp shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Cathay General Bancorp has higher revenue and earnings than WaFd. WaFd is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cathay General Bancorp, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Cathay General Bancorp has a net margin of 24.66% compared to WaFd's net margin of 18.47%. Cathay General Bancorp's return on equity of 11.71% beat WaFd's return on equity.

In the previous week, Cathay General Bancorp had 5 more articles in the media than WaFd. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Cathay General Bancorp and 8 mentions for WaFd. WaFd's average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat Cathay General Bancorp's score of 1.09 indicating that WaFd is being referred to more favorably in the media.

WaFd currently has a consensus target price of $37.00, indicating a potential upside of 2.52%. Cathay General Bancorp has a consensus target price of $62.25, indicating a potential upside of 0.61%. Given WaFd's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe WaFd is more favorable than Cathay General Bancorp.

WaFd has a beta of 0.84, meaning that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cathay General Bancorp has a beta of 0.86, meaning that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

WaFd pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Cathay General Bancorp pays an annual dividend of $1.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. WaFd pays out 34.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cathay General Bancorp pays out 29.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. WaFd has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. WaFd is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

77.2% of First Financial Bancorp. shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.7% of WaFd shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of First Financial Bancorp. shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of WaFd shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

First Financial Bancorp. has higher revenue and earnings than WaFd. WaFd is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than First Financial Bancorp., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

First Financial Bancorp. pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. WaFd pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. First Financial Bancorp. pays out 35.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. WaFd pays out 34.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. First Financial Bancorp. has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and WaFd has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

First Financial Bancorp. currently has a consensus price target of $33.67, suggesting a potential upside of 2.58%. WaFd has a consensus price target of $37.00, suggesting a potential upside of 2.52%. Given First Financial Bancorp.'s stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe First Financial Bancorp. is more favorable than WaFd.

First Financial Bancorp. has a net margin of 20.77% compared to WaFd's net margin of 18.47%. First Financial Bancorp.'s return on equity of 11.13% beat WaFd's return on equity.

First Financial Bancorp. has a beta of 0.92, indicating that its share price is 8% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, WaFd has a beta of 0.84, indicating that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, WaFd had 1 more articles in the media than First Financial Bancorp.. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for WaFd and 7 mentions for First Financial Bancorp.. WaFd's average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat First Financial Bancorp.'s score of 0.89 indicating that WaFd is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

In the previous week, Hancock Whitney had 2 more articles in the media than WaFd. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Hancock Whitney and 8 mentions for WaFd. Hancock Whitney's average media sentiment score of 1.75 beat WaFd's score of 1.26 indicating that Hancock Whitney is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Hancock Whitney has a net margin of 21.81% compared to WaFd's net margin of 18.47%. Hancock Whitney's return on equity of 11.36% beat WaFd's return on equity.

WaFd has a beta of 0.84, suggesting that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hancock Whitney has a beta of 0.95, suggesting that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

Hancock Whitney has higher revenue and earnings than WaFd. WaFd is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hancock Whitney, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

83.7% of WaFd shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.2% of Hancock Whitney shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of WaFd shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Hancock Whitney shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

WaFd pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Hancock Whitney pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. WaFd pays out 34.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hancock Whitney pays out 39.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. WaFd has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Hancock Whitney has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. WaFd is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

WaFd presently has a consensus target price of $37.00, suggesting a potential upside of 2.52%. Hancock Whitney has a consensus target price of $83.78, suggesting a potential upside of 11.60%. Given Hancock Whitney's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Hancock Whitney is more favorable than WaFd.

27.6% of Simmons First National shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.7% of WaFd shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Simmons First National shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of WaFd shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Simmons First National has a beta of 0.91, indicating that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, WaFd has a beta of 0.84, indicating that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, WaFd had 6 more articles in the media than Simmons First National. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for WaFd and 2 mentions for Simmons First National. WaFd's average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat Simmons First National's score of 1.04 indicating that WaFd is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Simmons First National presently has a consensus price target of $24.50, suggesting a potential upside of 7.98%. WaFd has a consensus price target of $37.00, suggesting a potential upside of 2.52%. Given Simmons First National's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Simmons First National is more favorable than WaFd.

WaFd has a net margin of 18.47% compared to Simmons First National's net margin of -24.64%. WaFd's return on equity of 8.98% beat Simmons First National's return on equity.

WaFd has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Simmons First National. Simmons First National is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than WaFd, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Simmons First National pays an annual dividend of $0.86 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. WaFd pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Simmons First National pays out -34.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. WaFd pays out 34.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Simmons First National has raised its dividend for 14 consecutive years and WaFd has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Simmons First National is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.