WaFd (WAFD) Competitors

WaFd currently has a consensus price target of $35.25, suggesting a potential upside of 19.45%. First Financial Bancorp. has a consensus price target of $34.00, suggesting a potential upside of 9.29%. Given WaFd's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe WaFd is more favorable than First Financial Bancorp..

In the previous week, WaFd had 10 more articles in the media than First Financial Bancorp.. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for WaFd and 1 mentions for First Financial Bancorp.. First Financial Bancorp.'s average media sentiment score of 1.79 beat WaFd's score of 0.68 indicating that First Financial Bancorp. is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

WaFd pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. First Financial Bancorp. pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. WaFd pays out 34.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. First Financial Bancorp. pays out 36.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. WaFd has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and First Financial Bancorp. has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. WaFd is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

83.7% of WaFd shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.2% of First Financial Bancorp. shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of WaFd shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of First Financial Bancorp. shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

WaFd has a beta of 0.89, suggesting that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, First Financial Bancorp. has a beta of 0.93, suggesting that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

First Financial Bancorp. has a net margin of 20.77% compared to WaFd's net margin of 18.47%. First Financial Bancorp.'s return on equity of 11.13% beat WaFd's return on equity.

First Financial Bancorp. has higher revenue and earnings than WaFd. WaFd is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than First Financial Bancorp., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

WaFd currently has a consensus target price of $35.25, suggesting a potential upside of 19.45%. Fulton Financial has a consensus target price of $24.75, suggesting a potential upside of 11.64%. Given WaFd's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe WaFd is more favorable than Fulton Financial.

83.7% of WaFd shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.0% of Fulton Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of WaFd shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Fulton Financial shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Fulton Financial has a net margin of 20.63% compared to WaFd's net margin of 18.47%. Fulton Financial's return on equity of 12.68% beat WaFd's return on equity.

WaFd has a beta of 0.89, meaning that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fulton Financial has a beta of 0.79, meaning that its stock price is 21% less volatile than the broader market.

Fulton Financial has higher revenue and earnings than WaFd. WaFd is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fulton Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Fulton Financial had 2 more articles in the media than WaFd. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Fulton Financial and 11 mentions for WaFd. WaFd's average media sentiment score of 0.68 beat Fulton Financial's score of 0.15 indicating that WaFd is being referred to more favorably in the media.

WaFd pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Fulton Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. WaFd pays out 34.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fulton Financial pays out 36.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. WaFd has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Fulton Financial has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. WaFd is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

83.7% of WaFd shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.2% of Hancock Whitney shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of WaFd shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Hancock Whitney shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

WaFd has a beta of 0.89, suggesting that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hancock Whitney has a beta of 0.97, suggesting that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

Hancock Whitney has a net margin of 21.81% compared to WaFd's net margin of 18.47%. Hancock Whitney's return on equity of 11.36% beat WaFd's return on equity.

In the previous week, WaFd had 6 more articles in the media than Hancock Whitney. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for WaFd and 5 mentions for Hancock Whitney. Hancock Whitney's average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat WaFd's score of 0.68 indicating that Hancock Whitney is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

WaFd pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Hancock Whitney pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. WaFd pays out 34.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hancock Whitney pays out 39.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. WaFd has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Hancock Whitney has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. WaFd is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

WaFd currently has a consensus price target of $35.25, suggesting a potential upside of 19.45%. Hancock Whitney has a consensus price target of $84.56, suggesting a potential upside of 16.40%. Given WaFd's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe WaFd is more favorable than Hancock Whitney.

Hancock Whitney has higher revenue and earnings than WaFd. WaFd is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hancock Whitney, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

WaFd has a beta of 0.89, suggesting that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, S&T Bancorp has a beta of 0.85, suggesting that its stock price is 15% less volatile than the broader market.

S&T Bancorp has a net margin of 24.51% compared to WaFd's net margin of 18.47%. S&T Bancorp's return on equity of 9.74% beat WaFd's return on equity.

83.7% of WaFd shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.2% of S&T Bancorp shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of WaFd shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of S&T Bancorp shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

WaFd presently has a consensus target price of $35.25, suggesting a potential upside of 19.45%. S&T Bancorp has a consensus target price of $51.60, suggesting a potential upside of 6.59%. Given WaFd's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe WaFd is more favorable than S&T Bancorp.

WaFd pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. S&T Bancorp pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. WaFd pays out 34.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. S&T Bancorp pays out 39.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. WaFd has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and S&T Bancorp has raised its dividend for 13 consecutive years. WaFd is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

WaFd has higher revenue and earnings than S&T Bancorp. WaFd is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than S&T Bancorp, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, WaFd had 7 more articles in the media than S&T Bancorp. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for WaFd and 4 mentions for S&T Bancorp. WaFd's average media sentiment score of 0.68 beat S&T Bancorp's score of 0.18 indicating that WaFd is being referred to more favorably in the media.