ASA Gold and Precious Metals Competitors

Tortoise Energy Infrastructure (NYSE:TYG) and ASA Gold and Precious Metals (NYSE:ASA) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, earnings, dividends, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Volatility and Risk

Tortoise Energy Infrastructure has a beta of 2.87, meaning that its stock price is 187% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ASA Gold and Precious Metals has a beta of 0.82, meaning that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Tortoise Energy Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. ASA Gold and Precious Metals pays an annual dividend of $0.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. ASA Gold and Precious Metals has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Tortoise Energy Infrastructure and ASA Gold and Precious Metals, as provided by MarketBeat.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Tortoise Energy Infrastructure and ASA Gold and Precious Metals' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares Tortoise Energy Infrastructure and ASA Gold and Precious Metals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

5.7% of Tortoise Energy Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Tortoise Energy Infrastructure shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of ASA Gold and Precious Metals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Tortoise Energy Infrastructure beats ASA Gold and Precious Metals on 3 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

ASA Gold and Precious Metals (NYSE:ASA) and Boulder Growth & Income Fund (NYSE:BIF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings, profitability, risk and institutional ownership.

Dividends

ASA Gold and Precious Metals pays an annual dividend of $0.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Boulder Growth & Income Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.41 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. ASA Gold and Precious Metals has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Boulder Growth & Income Fund has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Risk and Volatility

ASA Gold and Precious Metals has a beta of 0.82, indicating that its share price is 18% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Boulder Growth & Income Fund has a beta of 0.9, indicating that its share price is 10% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

12.1% of Boulder Growth & Income Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of ASA Gold and Precious Metals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Boulder Growth & Income Fund shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares ASA Gold and Precious Metals and Boulder Growth & Income Fund's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations for ASA Gold and Precious Metals and Boulder Growth & Income Fund, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Profitability

This table compares ASA Gold and Precious Metals and Boulder Growth & Income Fund's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Boulder Growth & Income Fund beats ASA Gold and Precious Metals on 3 of the 4 factors compared between the two stocks.

ASA Gold and Precious Metals (NYSE:ASA) and Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (NASDAQ:QQQX) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership and valuation.

Volatility and Risk

ASA Gold and Precious Metals has a beta of 0.82, meaning that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund has a beta of 1.14, meaning that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

19.7% of Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of ASA Gold and Precious Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares ASA Gold and Precious Metals and Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Dividends

ASA Gold and Precious Metals pays an annual dividend of $0.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. ASA Gold and Precious Metals has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Profitability

This table compares ASA Gold and Precious Metals and Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings for ASA Gold and Precious Metals and Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Summary

Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund beats ASA Gold and Precious Metals on 3 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

Tekla Healthcare Investors (NYSE:HQH) and ASA Gold and Precious Metals (NYSE:ASA) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, institutional ownership and valuation.

Dividends

Tekla Healthcare Investors pays an annual dividend of $1.89 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.9%. ASA Gold and Precious Metals pays an annual dividend of $0.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Tekla Healthcare Investors has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and ASA Gold and Precious Metals has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Volatility and Risk

Tekla Healthcare Investors has a beta of 1.11, suggesting that its share price is 11% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ASA Gold and Precious Metals has a beta of 0.82, suggesting that its share price is 18% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Tekla Healthcare Investors and ASA Gold and Precious Metals, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Tekla Healthcare Investors and ASA Gold and Precious Metals' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

22.2% of Tekla Healthcare Investors shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.3% of Tekla Healthcare Investors shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of ASA Gold and Precious Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Tekla Healthcare Investors and ASA Gold and Precious Metals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Tekla Healthcare Investors beats ASA Gold and Precious Metals on 4 of the 4 factors compared between the two stocks.

ASA Gold and Precious Metals (NYSE:ASA) and General American Investors (NYSE:GAM) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, institutional ownership and profitability.

Risk & Volatility

ASA Gold and Precious Metals has a beta of 0.82, indicating that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, General American Investors has a beta of 1.2, indicating that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

ASA Gold and Precious Metals pays an annual dividend of $0.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. General American Investors pays an annual dividend of $2.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.4%. ASA Gold and Precious Metals has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares ASA Gold and Precious Metals and General American Investors' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for ASA Gold and Precious Metals and General American Investors, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

23.0% of General American Investors shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of ASA Gold and Precious Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.0% of General American Investors shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares ASA Gold and Precious Metals and General American Investors' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

General American Investors beats ASA Gold and Precious Metals on 4 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund (NYSE:AWF) and ASA Gold and Precious Metals (NYSE:ASA) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability and earnings.

Volatility & Risk

AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund has a beta of 0.69, suggesting that its share price is 31% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ASA Gold and Precious Metals has a beta of 0.82, suggesting that its share price is 18% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.79 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.5%. ASA Gold and Precious Metals pays an annual dividend of $0.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and ASA Gold and Precious Metals has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund and ASA Gold and Precious Metals' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund and ASA Gold and Precious Metals, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Profitability

This table compares AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund and ASA Gold and Precious Metals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.