Boston Omaha (BOC) Competitors

Boston Omaha has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Exp World. Exp World is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Boston Omaha, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Boston Omaha has a beta of 0.69, suggesting that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Exp World has a beta of 2.11, suggesting that its share price is 111% more volatile than the broader market.

60.4% of Boston Omaha shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.2% of Exp World shares are held by institutional investors. 23.2% of Boston Omaha shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 26.6% of Exp World shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Exp World has a consensus price target of $7.67, indicating a potential upside of 65.59%. Given Exp World's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Exp World is more favorable than Boston Omaha.

In the previous week, Exp World had 4 more articles in the media than Boston Omaha. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Exp World and 0 mentions for Boston Omaha. Exp World's average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat Boston Omaha's score of 0.00 indicating that Exp World is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Exp World has a net margin of -0.35% compared to Boston Omaha's net margin of -12.10%. Boston Omaha's return on equity of -2.57% beat Exp World's return on equity.

Five Point has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Boston Omaha. Boston Omaha is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Five Point, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

38.1% of Five Point shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.4% of Boston Omaha shares are owned by institutional investors. 20.9% of Five Point shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 23.2% of Boston Omaha shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Five Point has a net margin of 41.16% compared to Boston Omaha's net margin of -12.10%. Five Point's return on equity of 1.99% beat Boston Omaha's return on equity.

Five Point has a beta of 1.33, meaning that its share price is 33% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Boston Omaha has a beta of 0.69, meaning that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Five Point's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Boston Omaha'saverage media sentiment score.

14.8% of Sky Harbour Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.4% of Boston Omaha shares are owned by institutional investors. 40.7% of Sky Harbour Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.2% of Boston Omaha shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Sky Harbour Group currently has a consensus price target of $13.00, suggesting a potential upside of 41.00%. Given Sky Harbour Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Sky Harbour Group is more favorable than Boston Omaha.

Sky Harbour Group has a beta of 1.32, suggesting that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Boston Omaha has a beta of 0.69, suggesting that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Sky Harbour Group had 1 more articles in the media than Boston Omaha. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Sky Harbour Group and 0 mentions for Boston Omaha. Sky Harbour Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Boston Omaha'saverage media sentiment score.

Sky Harbour Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Boston Omaha. Boston Omaha is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sky Harbour Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Sky Harbour Group has a net margin of 63.95% compared to Boston Omaha's net margin of -12.10%. Sky Harbour Group's return on equity of 6.83% beat Boston Omaha's return on equity.

In the previous week, Cresud S.A.C.I.F. y A. had 1 more articles in the media than Boston Omaha. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Cresud S.A.C.I.F. y A. and 0 mentions for Boston Omaha. Cresud S.A.C.I.F. y A.'s average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Boston Omaha's score of 0.00 indicating that Cresud S.A.C.I.F. y A. is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Cresud S.A.C.I.F. y A. has higher revenue and earnings than Boston Omaha. Boston Omaha is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cresud S.A.C.I.F. y A., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Boston Omaha has a beta of 0.69, indicating that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cresud S.A.C.I.F. y A. has a beta of 0.71, indicating that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

Cresud S.A.C.I.F. y A. has a net margin of 17.44% compared to Boston Omaha's net margin of -12.10%. Cresud S.A.C.I.F. y A.'s return on equity of 7.21% beat Boston Omaha's return on equity.

60.4% of Boston Omaha shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.9% of Cresud S.A.C.I.F. y A. shares are held by institutional investors. 23.2% of Boston Omaha shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 36.2% of Cresud S.A.C.I.F. y A. shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.