Boston Omaha (BOC) Competitors

Boston Omaha has a beta of 0.67, indicating that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Exp World has a beta of 2.2, indicating that its stock price is 120% more volatile than the S&P 500.

60.4% of Boston Omaha shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.2% of Exp World shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.2% of Boston Omaha shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 26.6% of Exp World shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Exp World has a net margin of -0.48% compared to Boston Omaha's net margin of -10.86%. Boston Omaha's return on equity of -2.26% beat Exp World's return on equity.

Exp World has a consensus target price of $7.92, indicating a potential upside of 26.06%. Given Exp World's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Exp World is more favorable than Boston Omaha.

Boston Omaha has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Exp World. Exp World is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Boston Omaha, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Exp World had 1 more articles in the media than Boston Omaha. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Exp World and 3 mentions for Boston Omaha. Boston Omaha's average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat Exp World's score of 0.00 indicating that Boston Omaha is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Boston Omaha has a beta of 0.67, indicating that its share price is 33% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sky Harbour Group has a beta of 1.39, indicating that its share price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500.

60.4% of Boston Omaha shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.8% of Sky Harbour Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.2% of Boston Omaha shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 40.8% of Sky Harbour Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Sky Harbour Group has a net margin of 68.33% compared to Boston Omaha's net margin of -10.86%. Sky Harbour Group's return on equity of 8.03% beat Boston Omaha's return on equity.

Sky Harbour Group has a consensus target price of $13.50, indicating a potential upside of 32.02%. Given Sky Harbour Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Sky Harbour Group is more favorable than Boston Omaha.

Sky Harbour Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Boston Omaha. Boston Omaha is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sky Harbour Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Boston Omaha had 2 more articles in the media than Sky Harbour Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Boston Omaha and 1 mentions for Sky Harbour Group. Boston Omaha's average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat Sky Harbour Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Boston Omaha is being referred to more favorably in the media.

38.1% of Five Point shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.4% of Boston Omaha shares are owned by institutional investors. 21.5% of Five Point shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 23.2% of Boston Omaha shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Boston Omaha had 3 more articles in the media than Five Point. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Boston Omaha and 0 mentions for Five Point. Boston Omaha's average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat Five Point's score of 0.00 indicating that Boston Omaha is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Five Point has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Boston Omaha. Boston Omaha is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Five Point, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Five Point has a beta of 1.34, suggesting that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Boston Omaha has a beta of 0.67, suggesting that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Five Point has a net margin of 41.16% compared to Boston Omaha's net margin of -10.86%. Five Point's return on equity of 1.99% beat Boston Omaha's return on equity.

12.9% of Cresud S.A.C.I.F. y A. shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.4% of Boston Omaha shares are owned by institutional investors. 36.2% of Cresud S.A.C.I.F. y A. shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 23.2% of Boston Omaha shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Cresud S.A.C.I.F. y A. and Cresud S.A.C.I.F. y A. both had 3 articles in the media. Boston Omaha's average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat Cresud S.A.C.I.F. y A.'s score of -0.46 indicating that Boston Omaha is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Cresud S.A.C.I.F. y A. has higher revenue and earnings than Boston Omaha. Boston Omaha is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cresud S.A.C.I.F. y A., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Cresud S.A.C.I.F. y A. has a beta of 0.71, suggesting that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Boston Omaha has a beta of 0.67, suggesting that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Cresud S.A.C.I.F. y A. has a net margin of 23.88% compared to Boston Omaha's net margin of -10.86%. Cresud S.A.C.I.F. y A.'s return on equity of 10.34% beat Boston Omaha's return on equity.