Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) Competitors

NorthWestern has higher revenue and earnings than Chesapeake Utilities. Chesapeake Utilities is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NorthWestern, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

NorthWestern pays an annual dividend of $2.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Chesapeake Utilities pays an annual dividend of $2.74 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. NorthWestern pays out 98.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Chesapeake Utilities pays out 45.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. NorthWestern has increased its dividend for 21 consecutive years and Chesapeake Utilities has increased its dividend for 22 consecutive years.

NorthWestern has a beta of 0.35, meaning that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Chesapeake Utilities has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the S&P 500.

96.1% of NorthWestern shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.1% of Chesapeake Utilities shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of NorthWestern shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Chesapeake Utilities shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, NorthWestern had 2 more articles in the media than Chesapeake Utilities. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for NorthWestern and 10 mentions for Chesapeake Utilities. Chesapeake Utilities' average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat NorthWestern's score of 0.76 indicating that Chesapeake Utilities is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Chesapeake Utilities has a net margin of 15.09% compared to NorthWestern's net margin of 10.21%. Chesapeake Utilities' return on equity of 9.31% beat NorthWestern's return on equity.

NorthWestern presently has a consensus target price of $68.30, suggesting a potential downside of 5.68%. Chesapeake Utilities has a consensus target price of $142.00, suggesting a potential upside of 11.95%. Given Chesapeake Utilities' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Chesapeake Utilities is more favorable than NorthWestern.

Atmos Energy presently has a consensus target price of $181.11, suggesting a potential downside of 0.32%. Chesapeake Utilities has a consensus target price of $142.00, suggesting a potential upside of 11.95%. Given Chesapeake Utilities' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Chesapeake Utilities is more favorable than Atmos Energy.

Atmos Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Chesapeake Utilities. Chesapeake Utilities is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Atmos Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Atmos Energy has a beta of 0.65, meaning that its share price is 35% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Chesapeake Utilities has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its share price is 29% less volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Atmos Energy had 12 more articles in the media than Chesapeake Utilities. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Atmos Energy and 10 mentions for Chesapeake Utilities. Atmos Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat Chesapeake Utilities' score of 0.93 indicating that Atmos Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

90.2% of Atmos Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.1% of Chesapeake Utilities shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Atmos Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Chesapeake Utilities shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Atmos Energy has a net margin of 25.67% compared to Chesapeake Utilities' net margin of 15.09%. Chesapeake Utilities' return on equity of 9.31% beat Atmos Energy's return on equity.

Atmos Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Chesapeake Utilities pays an annual dividend of $2.74 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Atmos Energy pays out 51.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Chesapeake Utilities pays out 45.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Atmos Energy has increased its dividend for 41 consecutive years and Chesapeake Utilities has increased its dividend for 22 consecutive years. Atmos Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Chesapeake Utilities currently has a consensus target price of $142.00, suggesting a potential upside of 11.95%. Avista has a consensus target price of $40.00, suggesting a potential downside of 2.30%. Given Chesapeake Utilities' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Chesapeake Utilities is more favorable than Avista.

Avista has higher revenue and earnings than Chesapeake Utilities. Avista is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chesapeake Utilities, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Chesapeake Utilities has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its share price is 29% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Avista has a beta of 0.24, meaning that its share price is 76% less volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Avista had 9 more articles in the media than Chesapeake Utilities. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Avista and 10 mentions for Chesapeake Utilities. Chesapeake Utilities' average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Avista's score of 0.43 indicating that Chesapeake Utilities is being referred to more favorably in the media.

83.1% of Chesapeake Utilities shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.2% of Avista shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of Chesapeake Utilities shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Avista shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Chesapeake Utilities has a net margin of 15.09% compared to Avista's net margin of 10.75%. Chesapeake Utilities' return on equity of 9.31% beat Avista's return on equity.

Chesapeake Utilities pays an annual dividend of $2.74 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Avista pays an annual dividend of $1.97 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Chesapeake Utilities pays out 45.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Avista pays out 78.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Chesapeake Utilities has raised its dividend for 22 consecutive years and Avista has raised its dividend for 23 consecutive years. Avista is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Chesapeake Utilities has a net margin of 15.09% compared to Black Hills' net margin of 12.62%. Chesapeake Utilities' return on equity of 9.31% beat Black Hills' return on equity.

83.1% of Chesapeake Utilities shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.7% of Black Hills shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of Chesapeake Utilities shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Black Hills shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Chesapeake Utilities has a beta of 0.71, indicating that its share price is 29% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Black Hills has a beta of 0.74, indicating that its share price is 26% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Chesapeake Utilities currently has a consensus price target of $142.00, suggesting a potential upside of 11.95%. Black Hills has a consensus price target of $81.40, suggesting a potential upside of 8.24%. Given Chesapeake Utilities' higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Chesapeake Utilities is more favorable than Black Hills.

Black Hills has higher revenue and earnings than Chesapeake Utilities. Black Hills is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chesapeake Utilities, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Chesapeake Utilities pays an annual dividend of $2.74 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Black Hills pays an annual dividend of $2.81 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Chesapeake Utilities pays out 45.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Black Hills pays out 70.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Chesapeake Utilities has raised its dividend for 22 consecutive years and Black Hills has raised its dividend for 55 consecutive years. Black Hills is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Black Hills had 6 more articles in the media than Chesapeake Utilities. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Black Hills and 10 mentions for Chesapeake Utilities. Chesapeake Utilities' average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Black Hills' score of 0.49 indicating that Chesapeake Utilities is being referred to more favorably in the media.