Black Hills Competitors

Black Hills (NYSE:BKH) and Dominion Energy (NYSE:D) are both utilities companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

Volatility and Risk

Black Hills has a beta of 0.28, meaning that its stock price is 72% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Dominion Energy has a beta of 0.3, meaning that its stock price is 70% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Black Hills pays an annual dividend of $2.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Dominion Energy pays an annual dividend of $2.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Black Hills pays out 64.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Dominion Energy pays out 59.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Black Hills has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Dominion Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Black Hills is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Black Hills and Dominion Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.

Black Hills presently has a consensus price target of $73.00, suggesting a potential upside of 21.87%. Dominion Energy has a consensus price target of $82.5714, suggesting a potential upside of 18.16%. Given Black Hills' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Black Hills is more favorable than Dominion Energy.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Black Hills and Dominion Energy's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Dominion Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Black Hills. Dominion Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Black Hills, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Black Hills and Dominion Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

85.5% of Black Hills shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.1% of Dominion Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Black Hills shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Dominion Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Dominion Energy beats Black Hills on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Black Hills (NYSE:BKH) and Sempra Energy (NYSE:SRE) are both utilities companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

Volatility and Risk

Black Hills has a beta of 0.28, meaning that its stock price is 72% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sempra Energy has a beta of 0.6, meaning that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Black Hills pays an annual dividend of $2.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Sempra Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.18 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Black Hills pays out 64.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sempra Energy pays out 61.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Black Hills has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Sempra Energy has raised its dividend for 10 consecutive years.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Black Hills and Sempra Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.

Black Hills presently has a consensus price target of $73.00, suggesting a potential upside of 21.87%. Sempra Energy has a consensus price target of $141.25, suggesting a potential upside of 19.84%. Given Black Hills' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Black Hills is more favorable than Sempra Energy.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Black Hills and Sempra Energy's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Sempra Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Black Hills. Black Hills is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sempra Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Black Hills and Sempra Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

85.5% of Black Hills shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.8% of Sempra Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Black Hills shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Sempra Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Sempra Energy beats Black Hills on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Black Hills (NYSE:BKH) and Public Service Enterprise Group (NYSE:PEG) are both utilities companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

Volatility and Risk

Black Hills has a beta of 0.28, meaning that its stock price is 72% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Public Service Enterprise Group has a beta of 0.49, meaning that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

85.5% of Black Hills shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.6% of Public Service Enterprise Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Black Hills shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Public Service Enterprise Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Black Hills and Public Service Enterprise Group's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Public Service Enterprise Group has higher revenue and earnings than Black Hills. Public Service Enterprise Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Black Hills, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Black Hills and Public Service Enterprise Group, as reported by MarketBeat.

Black Hills presently has a consensus price target of $73.00, suggesting a potential upside of 21.87%. Public Service Enterprise Group has a consensus price target of $63.7273, suggesting a potential upside of 15.62%. Given Black Hills' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Black Hills is more favorable than Public Service Enterprise Group.

Profitability

This table compares Black Hills and Public Service Enterprise Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

Black Hills pays an annual dividend of $2.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Public Service Enterprise Group pays an annual dividend of $1.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Black Hills pays out 64.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Public Service Enterprise Group pays out 59.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Black Hills has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Public Service Enterprise Group has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Black Hills is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Public Service Enterprise Group beats Black Hills on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Black Hills (NYSE:BKH) and WEC Energy Group (NYSE:WEC) are both utilities companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares Black Hills and WEC Energy Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk & Volatility

Black Hills has a beta of 0.28, suggesting that its share price is 72% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, WEC Energy Group has a beta of 0.18, suggesting that its share price is 82% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Black Hills and WEC Energy Group, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Black Hills presently has a consensus price target of $73.00, suggesting a potential upside of 21.87%. WEC Energy Group has a consensus price target of $94.20, suggesting a potential upside of 13.71%. Given Black Hills' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Black Hills is more favorable than WEC Energy Group.

Dividends

Black Hills pays an annual dividend of $2.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. WEC Energy Group pays an annual dividend of $2.71 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Black Hills pays out 64.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. WEC Energy Group pays out 75.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Black Hills has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and WEC Energy Group has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Black Hills is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

85.5% of Black Hills shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.1% of WEC Energy Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Black Hills shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of WEC Energy Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Black Hills and WEC Energy Group's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

WEC Energy Group has higher revenue and earnings than Black Hills. Black Hills is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than WEC Energy Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Black Hills beats WEC Energy Group on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

DTE Energy (NYSE:DTE) and Black Hills (NYSE:BKH) are both utilities companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, risk, institutional ownership and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares DTE Energy and Black Hills' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

DTE Energy has a beta of 0.55, meaning that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Black Hills has a beta of 0.28, meaning that its stock price is 72% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

73.6% of DTE Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.5% of Black Hills shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of DTE Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Black Hills shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for DTE Energy and Black Hills, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

DTE Energy currently has a consensus price target of $131.1538, suggesting a potential upside of 10.08%. Black Hills has a consensus price target of $73.00, suggesting a potential upside of 21.87%. Given Black Hills' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Black Hills is more favorable than DTE Energy.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares DTE Energy and Black Hills' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

DTE Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Black Hills. Black Hills is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than DTE Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

DTE Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.34 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Black Hills pays an annual dividend of $2.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. DTE Energy pays out 68.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Black Hills pays out 64.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. DTE Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Black Hills has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Black Hills is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Black Hills beats DTE Energy on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Black Hills (NYSE:BKH) and Consolidated Edison (NYSE:ED) are both utilities companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, dividends and valuation.

Risk and Volatility

Black Hills has a beta of 0.28, suggesting that its stock price is 72% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Consolidated Edison has a beta of 0.11, suggesting that its stock price is 89% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Black Hills and Consolidated Edison's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

Black Hills pays an annual dividend of $2.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Consolidated Edison pays an annual dividend of $3.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. Black Hills pays out 64.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Consolidated Edison pays out 70.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Black Hills has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Consolidated Edison has increased its dividend for 47 consecutive years. Consolidated Edison is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Black Hills and Consolidated Edison, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Black Hills presently has a consensus target price of $73.00, suggesting a potential upside of 21.87%. Consolidated Edison has a consensus target price of $76.1154, suggesting a potential upside of 13.49%. Given Black Hills' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Black Hills is more favorable than Consolidated Edison.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

85.5% of Black Hills shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.4% of Consolidated Edison shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Black Hills shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Consolidated Edison shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Black Hills and Consolidated Edison's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Consolidated Edison has higher revenue and earnings than Black Hills. Consolidated Edison is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Black Hills, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Black Hills beats Consolidated Edison on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.