Go Pro

Black Hills (BKH) Competitors

Black Hills logo
$71.38 -0.90 (-1.25%)
Closing price 09/11/2026 03:58 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$72.15 +0.77 (+1.08%)
As of 09/11/2026 07:30 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

BKH vs. EVRG, LNT, NWE, AEE, and AVA

Should you buy Black Hills stock or one of its competitors? Black Hills's main competitors and comparable companies include Evergy (EVRG), Alliant Energy (LNT), NorthWestern (NWE), Ameren (AEE), and Avista (AVA). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "utilities" sector.

How does Black Hills compare to Evergy?

Black Hills (NYSE:BKH) and Evergy (NASDAQ:EVRG) are both utilities companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

In the previous week, Black Hills and Black Hills both had 6 articles in the media. Evergy's average media sentiment score of 1.70 beat Black Hills' score of 1.22 indicating that Evergy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Black Hills
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Evergy
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Black Hills has a beta of 0.71, suggesting that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Evergy has a beta of 0.53, suggesting that its share price is 47% less volatile than the broader market.

86.7% of Black Hills shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.2% of Evergy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Black Hills shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Evergy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Evergy has a net margin of 15.19% compared to Black Hills' net margin of 13.01%. Evergy's return on equity of 9.20% beat Black Hills' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Black Hills13.01% 7.98% 2.93%
Evergy 15.19%9.20%2.76%

Evergy has higher revenue and earnings than Black Hills. Black Hills is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Evergy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Black Hills$2.30B2.37$291.60M$3.9618.02
Evergy$6.09B3.09$855.60M$3.9420.72

Black Hills pays an annual dividend of $2.81 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Evergy pays an annual dividend of $2.78 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Black Hills pays out 71.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Evergy pays out 70.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Black Hills has raised its dividend for 55 consecutive years and Evergy has raised its dividend for 20 consecutive years. Black Hills is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Black Hills presently has a consensus price target of $81.67, indicating a potential upside of 14.42%. Evergy has a consensus price target of $90.60, indicating a potential upside of 11.00%. Given Black Hills' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Black Hills is more favorable than Evergy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Black Hills
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Evergy
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.73

Summary

Evergy beats Black Hills on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Black Hills compare to Alliant Energy?

Black Hills (NYSE:BKH) and Alliant Energy (NASDAQ:LNT) are both utilities companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and profitability.

86.7% of Black Hills shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.9% of Alliant Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Black Hills shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Alliant Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Alliant Energy had 9 more articles in the media than Black Hills. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Alliant Energy and 6 mentions for Black Hills. Black Hills' average media sentiment score of 1.22 beat Alliant Energy's score of 0.98 indicating that Black Hills is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Black Hills
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Alliant Energy
10 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Black Hills pays an annual dividend of $2.81 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Alliant Energy pays an annual dividend of $2.14 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Black Hills pays out 71.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Alliant Energy pays out 67.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Black Hills has increased its dividend for 55 consecutive years and Alliant Energy has increased its dividend for 22 consecutive years. Black Hills is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Black Hills has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alliant Energy has a beta of 0.54, meaning that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

Black Hills currently has a consensus price target of $81.67, suggesting a potential upside of 14.42%. Alliant Energy has a consensus price target of $77.00, suggesting a potential upside of 14.48%. Given Alliant Energy's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Alliant Energy is more favorable than Black Hills.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Black Hills
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Alliant Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.64

Alliant Energy has a net margin of 18.45% compared to Black Hills' net margin of 13.01%. Alliant Energy's return on equity of 11.16% beat Black Hills' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Black Hills13.01% 7.98% 2.93%
Alliant Energy 18.45%11.16%3.31%

Alliant Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Black Hills. Black Hills is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Alliant Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Black Hills$2.30B2.37$291.60M$3.9618.02
Alliant Energy$4.43B3.94$810M$3.1621.28

Summary

Alliant Energy beats Black Hills on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Black Hills compare to NorthWestern?

Black Hills (NYSE:BKH) and NorthWestern (NASDAQ:NWE) are both mid-cap utilities companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and dividends.

86.7% of Black Hills shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.1% of NorthWestern shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Black Hills shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of NorthWestern shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Black Hills presently has a consensus price target of $81.67, suggesting a potential upside of 14.42%. NorthWestern has a consensus price target of $72.70, suggesting a potential upside of 5.00%. Given Black Hills' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Black Hills is more favorable than NorthWestern.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Black Hills
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
NorthWestern
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Black Hills pays an annual dividend of $2.81 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. NorthWestern pays an annual dividend of $2.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Black Hills pays out 71.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. NorthWestern pays out 96.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Black Hills has raised its dividend for 55 consecutive years and NorthWestern has raised its dividend for 21 consecutive years. Black Hills is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Black Hills has a net margin of 13.01% compared to NorthWestern's net margin of 10.13%. NorthWestern's return on equity of 8.03% beat Black Hills' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Black Hills13.01% 7.98% 2.93%
NorthWestern 10.13%8.03%2.73%

Black Hills has higher revenue and earnings than NorthWestern. Black Hills is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NorthWestern, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Black Hills$2.30B2.37$291.60M$3.9618.02
NorthWestern$1.69B2.52$181.09M$2.7725.00

Black Hills has a beta of 0.71, indicating that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NorthWestern has a beta of 0.34, indicating that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, NorthWestern had 1 more articles in the media than Black Hills. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for NorthWestern and 6 mentions for Black Hills. Black Hills' average media sentiment score of 1.22 beat NorthWestern's score of 0.26 indicating that Black Hills is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Black Hills
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
NorthWestern
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Black Hills beats NorthWestern on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Black Hills compare to Ameren?

Black Hills (NYSE:BKH) and Ameren (NYSE:AEE) are both utilities companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, dividends and valuation.

Ameren has a net margin of 17.86% compared to Black Hills' net margin of 13.01%. Ameren's return on equity of 10.95% beat Black Hills' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Black Hills13.01% 7.98% 2.93%
Ameren 17.86%10.95%3.00%

Black Hills presently has a consensus price target of $81.67, indicating a potential upside of 14.42%. Ameren has a consensus price target of $121.42, indicating a potential upside of 15.65%. Given Ameren's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Ameren is more favorable than Black Hills.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Black Hills
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Ameren
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.77

86.7% of Black Hills shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.1% of Ameren shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Black Hills shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Ameren shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Black Hills has a beta of 0.71, indicating that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ameren has a beta of 0.46, indicating that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Ameren had 7 more articles in the media than Black Hills. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Ameren and 6 mentions for Black Hills. Ameren's average media sentiment score of 1.22 beat Black Hills' score of 1.22 indicating that Ameren is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Black Hills
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Ameren
8 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Ameren has higher revenue and earnings than Black Hills. Black Hills is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ameren, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Black Hills$2.30B2.37$291.60M$3.9618.02
Ameren$8.75B3.32$1.46B$5.6818.48

Black Hills pays an annual dividend of $2.81 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Ameren pays an annual dividend of $3.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Black Hills pays out 71.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ameren pays out 52.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Black Hills has increased its dividend for 55 consecutive years and Ameren has increased its dividend for 12 consecutive years. Black Hills is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Ameren beats Black Hills on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Black Hills compare to Avista?

Avista (NYSE:AVA) and Black Hills (NYSE:BKH) are both mid-cap utilities companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, earnings and valuation.

Black Hills has higher revenue and earnings than Avista. Avista is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Black Hills, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Avista$1.92B1.61$193M$2.7713.28
Black Hills$2.30B2.37$291.60M$3.9618.02

In the previous week, Black Hills had 5 more articles in the media than Avista. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Black Hills and 1 mentions for Avista. Avista's average media sentiment score of 1.45 beat Black Hills' score of 1.22 indicating that Avista is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Avista
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Black Hills
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Avista pays an annual dividend of $1.97 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.4%. Black Hills pays an annual dividend of $2.81 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Avista pays out 71.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Black Hills pays out 71.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Avista has raised its dividend for 23 consecutive years and Black Hills has raised its dividend for 55 consecutive years.

Avista has a beta of 0.25, suggesting that its stock price is 75% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Black Hills has a beta of 0.71, suggesting that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

Avista currently has a consensus price target of $39.25, indicating a potential upside of 6.67%. Black Hills has a consensus price target of $81.67, indicating a potential upside of 14.42%. Given Black Hills' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Black Hills is more favorable than Avista.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Avista
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.14
Black Hills
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

85.2% of Avista shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.7% of Black Hills shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Avista shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Black Hills shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Black Hills has a net margin of 13.01% compared to Avista's net margin of 11.83%. Black Hills' return on equity of 7.98% beat Avista's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Avista11.83% 7.85% 2.57%
Black Hills 13.01%7.98%2.93%

Summary

Black Hills beats Avista on 16 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Black Hills News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BKH and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BKH and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BKH vs. The Competition

MetricBlack HillsMulti IndustryUtilities SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$5.51B$21.49B$15.73B$23.19B
Dividend Yield3.86%3.88%4.05%3.56%
P/E Ratio18.0225.9424.3728.69
Price / Sales2.3716.44272.1499.85
Price / Cash9.1911.0618.6233.82
Price / Book1.381.892.174.74
Net Income$291.60M$269.64M$701.43M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-2.41%-0.57%-0.83%-1.99%
1 Month Performance-2.26%-2.43%-2.14%-2.68%
1 Year Performance20.23%14.20%7.68%10.45%

Black Hills Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BKH
Black Hills
4.1438 of 5 stars
$71.38
-1.2%
$81.67
+14.4%
+20.1%$5.51B$2.30B18.022,795
EVRG
Evergy
4.4016 of 5 stars
$81.54
flat
$90.60
+11.1%
+12.9%$18.80B$5.96B20.704,691
LNT
Alliant Energy
4.2069 of 5 stars
$67.97
flat
$77.00
+13.3%
+4.0%$17.62B$4.36B21.512,948
NWE
NorthWestern
2.9467 of 5 stars
$70.78
flat
$73.30
+3.6%
+21.3%$4.35B$1.61B25.551,667
AEE
Ameren
4.7642 of 5 stars
$106.34
-0.1%
$121.42
+14.2%
+4.6%$29.48B$8.80B18.728,913

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:BKH) was last updated on 9/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners