Go Pro

Black Hills (BKH) Competitors

Black Hills logo
$71.06 -0.15 (-0.21%)
Closing price 07/31/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$71.63 +0.57 (+0.81%)
As of 07/31/2026 07:34 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

BKH vs. EVRG, LNT, NWE, AEE, and AVA

Should you buy Black Hills stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Black Hills with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Black Hills include Evergy (EVRG), Alliant Energy (LNT), NorthWestern (NWE), Ameren (AEE), and Avista (AVA). These companies are all part of the "utilities" sector.

How does Black Hills compare to Evergy?

Evergy (NASDAQ:EVRG) and Black Hills (NYSE:BKH) are both utilities companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, risk and media sentiment.

Evergy pays an annual dividend of $2.78 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Black Hills pays an annual dividend of $2.81 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Evergy pays out 73.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Black Hills pays out 73.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Evergy has increased its dividend for 20 consecutive years and Black Hills has increased its dividend for 55 consecutive years. Black Hills is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Evergy has a net margin of 14.63% compared to Black Hills' net margin of 12.61%. Evergy's return on equity of 9.09% beat Black Hills' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Evergy14.63% 9.09% 2.75%
Black Hills 12.61%7.77%2.86%

Evergy currently has a consensus price target of $90.60, indicating a potential upside of 9.14%. Black Hills has a consensus price target of $81.67, indicating a potential upside of 14.93%. Given Black Hills' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Black Hills is more favorable than Evergy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Evergy
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.73
Black Hills
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Evergy and Evergy both had 11 articles in the media. Black Hills' average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat Evergy's score of 1.06 indicating that Black Hills is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Evergy
8 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Black Hills
6 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

87.2% of Evergy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.7% of Black Hills shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Evergy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Black Hills shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Evergy has a beta of 0.54, suggesting that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Black Hills has a beta of 0.71, suggesting that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

Evergy has higher revenue and earnings than Black Hills. Black Hills is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Evergy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Evergy$5.96B3.21$855.60M$3.7722.02
Black Hills$2.31B2.34$291.60M$3.8418.50

Summary

Evergy and Black Hills tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Black Hills compare to Alliant Energy?

Black Hills (NYSE:BKH) and Alliant Energy (NASDAQ:LNT) are both utilities companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, media sentiment, dividends and valuation.

Alliant Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Black Hills. Black Hills is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Alliant Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Black Hills$2.31B2.34$291.60M$3.8418.50
Alliant Energy$4.36B4.19$810M$3.1922.19

Black Hills currently has a consensus target price of $81.67, indicating a potential upside of 14.93%. Alliant Energy has a consensus target price of $77.09, indicating a potential upside of 8.92%. Given Black Hills' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Black Hills is more favorable than Alliant Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Black Hills
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Alliant Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.64

Alliant Energy has a net margin of 18.45% compared to Black Hills' net margin of 12.61%. Alliant Energy's return on equity of 11.16% beat Black Hills' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Black Hills12.61% 7.77% 2.86%
Alliant Energy 18.45%11.16%3.31%

86.7% of Black Hills shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.9% of Alliant Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Black Hills shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Alliant Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Alliant Energy had 14 more articles in the media than Black Hills. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Alliant Energy and 11 mentions for Black Hills. Alliant Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Black Hills' score of 1.09 indicating that Alliant Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Black Hills
6 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Alliant Energy
15 Very Positive mention(s)
7 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Black Hills has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alliant Energy has a beta of 0.55, meaning that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

Black Hills pays an annual dividend of $2.81 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Alliant Energy pays an annual dividend of $2.14 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Black Hills pays out 73.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Alliant Energy pays out 67.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Black Hills has increased its dividend for 55 consecutive years and Alliant Energy has increased its dividend for 22 consecutive years. Black Hills is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Alliant Energy beats Black Hills on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Black Hills compare to NorthWestern?

NorthWestern (NASDAQ:NWE) and Black Hills (NYSE:BKH) are both mid-cap utilities companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, risk and analyst recommendations.

96.1% of NorthWestern shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.7% of Black Hills shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of NorthWestern shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Black Hills shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

NorthWestern pays an annual dividend of $2.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Black Hills pays an annual dividend of $2.81 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. NorthWestern pays out 96.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Black Hills pays out 73.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. NorthWestern has increased its dividend for 21 consecutive years and Black Hills has increased its dividend for 55 consecutive years. Black Hills is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

NorthWestern has a beta of 0.34, indicating that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Black Hills has a beta of 0.71, indicating that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

Black Hills has a net margin of 12.61% compared to NorthWestern's net margin of 10.13%. NorthWestern's return on equity of 8.03% beat Black Hills' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
NorthWestern10.13% 8.03% 2.73%
Black Hills 12.61%7.77%2.86%

In the previous week, NorthWestern had 2 more articles in the media than Black Hills. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for NorthWestern and 11 mentions for Black Hills. Black Hills' average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat NorthWestern's score of 1.01 indicating that Black Hills is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
NorthWestern
6 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Black Hills
6 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Black Hills has higher revenue and earnings than NorthWestern. Black Hills is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NorthWestern, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
NorthWestern$1.61B2.63$181.09M$2.7724.82
Black Hills$2.31B2.34$291.60M$3.8418.50

NorthWestern currently has a consensus price target of $73.30, indicating a potential upside of 6.63%. Black Hills has a consensus price target of $81.67, indicating a potential upside of 14.93%. Given Black Hills' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Black Hills is more favorable than NorthWestern.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
NorthWestern
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Black Hills
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Black Hills beats NorthWestern on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Black Hills compare to Ameren?

Black Hills (NYSE:BKH) and Ameren (NYSE:AEE) are both utilities companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Ameren has higher revenue and earnings than Black Hills. Black Hills is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ameren, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Black Hills$2.31B2.34$291.60M$3.8418.50
Ameren$8.80B3.45$1.46B$5.5619.74

Ameren has a net margin of 17.86% compared to Black Hills' net margin of 12.61%. Ameren's return on equity of 10.95% beat Black Hills' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Black Hills12.61% 7.77% 2.86%
Ameren 17.86%10.95%3.00%

Black Hills pays an annual dividend of $2.81 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Ameren pays an annual dividend of $3.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Black Hills pays out 73.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ameren pays out 54.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Black Hills has increased its dividend for 55 consecutive years and Ameren has increased its dividend for 12 consecutive years. Black Hills is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Ameren had 17 more articles in the media than Black Hills. MarketBeat recorded 28 mentions for Ameren and 11 mentions for Black Hills. Black Hills' average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat Ameren's score of 0.89 indicating that Black Hills is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Black Hills
6 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Ameren
14 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
9 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Black Hills presently has a consensus target price of $81.67, suggesting a potential upside of 14.93%. Ameren has a consensus target price of $121.50, suggesting a potential upside of 10.69%. Given Black Hills' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Black Hills is more favorable than Ameren.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Black Hills
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Ameren
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.77

Black Hills has a beta of 0.71, suggesting that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ameren has a beta of 0.47, suggesting that its share price is 53% less volatile than the broader market.

86.7% of Black Hills shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.1% of Ameren shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Black Hills shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Ameren shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Ameren beats Black Hills on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Black Hills compare to Avista?

Black Hills (NYSE:BKH) and Avista (NYSE:AVA) are both mid-cap utilities companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, profitability, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings and analyst recommendations.

86.7% of Black Hills shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.2% of Avista shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Black Hills shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Avista shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Black Hills pays an annual dividend of $2.81 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Avista pays an annual dividend of $1.97 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.9%. Black Hills pays out 73.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Avista pays out 78.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Black Hills has raised its dividend for 55 consecutive years and Avista has raised its dividend for 23 consecutive years.

Black Hills has higher revenue and earnings than Avista. Avista is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Black Hills, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Black Hills$2.31B2.34$291.60M$3.8418.50
Avista$1.96B1.70$193M$2.5116.13

Black Hills has a beta of 0.71, suggesting that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Avista has a beta of 0.25, suggesting that its stock price is 75% less volatile than the broader market.

Black Hills has a net margin of 12.61% compared to Avista's net margin of 10.75%. Black Hills' return on equity of 7.77% beat Avista's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Black Hills12.61% 7.77% 2.86%
Avista 10.75%7.65%2.50%

In the previous week, Black Hills had 2 more articles in the media than Avista. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Black Hills and 9 mentions for Avista. Black Hills' average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat Avista's score of 0.69 indicating that Black Hills is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Black Hills
6 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Avista
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Black Hills presently has a consensus price target of $81.67, indicating a potential upside of 14.93%. Avista has a consensus price target of $40.00, indicating a potential downside of 1.22%. Given Black Hills' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Black Hills is more favorable than Avista.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Black Hills
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Avista
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.14

Summary

Black Hills beats Avista on 17 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Black Hills News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BKH and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BKH and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BKH vs. The Competition

MetricBlack HillsMulti IndustryUtilities SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$5.41B$22.55B$16.19B$23.67B
Dividend Yield3.95%3.70%4.00%4.22%
P/E Ratio18.5032.7323.0531.00
Price / Sales2.3415.88391.2219.22
Price / Cash9.0511.3418.7818.73
Price / Book1.371.952.244.76
Net Income$291.60M$269.64M$701.59M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-4.87%-1.18%-1.08%-0.34%
1 Month Performance-3.51%1.02%-0.80%-0.53%
1 Year Performance23.02%18.34%18.61%19.19%

Black Hills Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BKH
Black Hills
4.0098 of 5 stars
$71.06
-0.2%
$81.67
+14.9%
+23.0%$5.41B$2.31B18.502,795
EVRG
Evergy
4.223 of 5 stars
$85.16
-0.5%
$90.10
+5.8%
+16.0%$19.73B$5.96B22.594,691
LNT
Alliant Energy
4.0086 of 5 stars
$73.96
-1.1%
$77.36
+4.6%
+8.1%$19.32B$4.36B23.182,948
NWE
NorthWestern
3.0437 of 5 stars
$71.88
-0.2%
$70.10
-2.5%
+28.4%$4.43B$1.61B26.431,667
AEE
Ameren
4.3901 of 5 stars
$110.47
-1.0%
$120.67
+9.2%
+7.5%$30.87B$8.80B19.878,913

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:BKH) was last updated on 8/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners