Which has better earnings and valuation, BKH or EVRG?

Evergy has higher revenue and earnings than Black Hills. Black Hills is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Evergy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Black Hills $2.31B 2.37 $291.60M $3.96 18.11 Evergy $5.96B 3.13 $855.60M $3.94 20.54

Is BKH or EVRG more profitable?

Evergy has a net margin of 15.19% compared to Black Hills' net margin of 13.01%. Evergy's return on equity of 9.20% beat Black Hills' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Black Hills 13.01% 7.98% 2.93% Evergy 15.19% 9.20% 2.76%

Does the media favor BKH or EVRG?

In the previous week, Evergy had 9 more articles in the media than Black Hills. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Evergy and 6 mentions for Black Hills. Black Hills' average media sentiment score of 1.60 beat Evergy's score of 1.50 indicating that Black Hills is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Black Hills 5 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive Evergy 13 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Which has higher earnings and valuation, BKH or LNT?

Alliant Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Black Hills. Black Hills is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Alliant Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Black Hills $2.31B 2.37 $291.60M $3.96 18.11 Alliant Energy $4.36B 4.03 $810M $3.16 21.47

Does the media refer more to BKH or LNT?

In the previous week, Alliant Energy had 12 more articles in the media than Black Hills. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Alliant Energy and 6 mentions for Black Hills. Black Hills' average media sentiment score of 1.60 beat Alliant Energy's score of 0.92 indicating that Black Hills is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Black Hills 5 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive Alliant Energy 7 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has better earnings and valuation, NWE or BKH?

Black Hills has higher revenue and earnings than NorthWestern. Black Hills is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NorthWestern, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio NorthWestern $1.61B 2.65 $181.09M $2.77 25.07 Black Hills $2.31B 2.37 $291.60M $3.96 18.11

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, BKH or AEE?

Ameren has higher revenue and earnings than Black Hills. Black Hills is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ameren, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Black Hills $2.31B 2.37 $291.60M $3.96 18.11 Ameren $8.80B 3.34 $1.46B $5.68 18.69

Is BKH or AEE more profitable?

Ameren has a net margin of 17.86% compared to Black Hills' net margin of 13.01%. Ameren's return on equity of 10.95% beat Black Hills' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Black Hills 13.01% 7.98% 2.93% Ameren 17.86% 10.95% 3.00%

Does the media refer more to BKH or AEE?

In the previous week, Ameren had 22 more articles in the media than Black Hills. MarketBeat recorded 28 mentions for Ameren and 6 mentions for Black Hills. Black Hills' average media sentiment score of 1.60 beat Ameren's score of 0.99 indicating that Black Hills is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Black Hills 5 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive Ameren 17 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 3 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, AVA or BKH?

Black Hills has higher revenue and earnings than Avista. Avista is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Black Hills, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Avista $1.96B 1.60 $193M $2.77 13.58 Black Hills $2.31B 2.37 $291.60M $3.96 18.11

Is AVA or BKH more profitable?

Black Hills has a net margin of 13.01% compared to Avista's net margin of 11.83%. Black Hills' return on equity of 7.98% beat Avista's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Avista 11.83% 7.85% 2.57% Black Hills 13.01% 7.98% 2.93%

Does the media prefer AVA or BKH?

In the previous week, Black Hills had 3 more articles in the media than Avista. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Black Hills and 3 mentions for Avista. Black Hills' average media sentiment score of 1.60 beat Avista's score of 1.48 indicating that Black Hills is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Avista 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Black Hills 5 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Black Hills (BKH) Competitors

$71.71 -1.58 (-2.16%)

As of 08/21/2026 03:58 PM Eastern

Compare

BKH vs. EVRG, LNT, NWE, AEE, and AVA

Should you buy Black Hills stock or one of its competitors? Black Hills's main competitors and comparable companies include Evergy (EVRG), Alliant Energy (LNT), NorthWestern (NWE), Ameren (AEE), and Avista (AVA). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "utilities" sector.

How does Black Hills compare to Evergy?

Black Hills (NYSE:BKH) and Evergy (NASDAQ:EVRG) are both utilities companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability and earnings.

Evergy has a net margin of 15.19% compared to Black Hills' net margin of 13.01%. Evergy's return on equity of 9.20% beat Black Hills' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Black Hills	13.01%	7.98%	2.93%
Evergy	15.19%	9.20%	2.76%

Black Hills currently has a consensus target price of $81.67, indicating a potential upside of 13.88%. Evergy has a consensus target price of $90.60, indicating a potential upside of 11.96%. Given Black Hills' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Black Hills is more favorable than Evergy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Black Hills	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Evergy	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.73

In the previous week, Evergy had 9 more articles in the media than Black Hills. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Evergy and 6 mentions for Black Hills. Black Hills' average media sentiment score of 1.60 beat Evergy's score of 1.50 indicating that Black Hills is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Black Hills	5 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Evergy	13 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

86.7% of Black Hills shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.2% of Evergy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Black Hills shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Evergy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Black Hills has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Evergy has a beta of 0.54, meaning that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

Black Hills pays an annual dividend of $2.81 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Evergy pays an annual dividend of $2.78 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Black Hills pays out 71.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Evergy pays out 70.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Black Hills has raised its dividend for 55 consecutive years and Evergy has raised its dividend for 20 consecutive years. Black Hills is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Evergy has higher revenue and earnings than Black Hills. Black Hills is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Evergy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Black Hills	$2.31B	2.37	$291.60M	$3.96	18.11
Evergy	$5.96B	3.13	$855.60M	$3.94	20.54

Summary

Evergy beats Black Hills on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Black Hills compare to Alliant Energy?

Black Hills (NYSE:BKH) and Alliant Energy (NASDAQ:LNT) are both utilities companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, valuation and earnings.

Black Hills pays an annual dividend of $2.81 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Alliant Energy pays an annual dividend of $2.14 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Black Hills pays out 71.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Alliant Energy pays out 67.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Black Hills has increased its dividend for 55 consecutive years and Alliant Energy has increased its dividend for 22 consecutive years. Black Hills is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Alliant Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Black Hills. Black Hills is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Alliant Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Black Hills	$2.31B	2.37	$291.60M	$3.96	18.11
Alliant Energy	$4.36B	4.03	$810M	$3.16	21.47

Black Hills has a beta of 0.71, suggesting that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alliant Energy has a beta of 0.55, suggesting that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

Black Hills presently has a consensus target price of $81.67, suggesting a potential upside of 13.88%. Alliant Energy has a consensus target price of $76.82, suggesting a potential upside of 13.20%. Given Black Hills' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Black Hills is more favorable than Alliant Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Black Hills	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Alliant Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.64

Alliant Energy has a net margin of 18.45% compared to Black Hills' net margin of 13.01%. Alliant Energy's return on equity of 11.16% beat Black Hills' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Black Hills	13.01%	7.98%	2.93%
Alliant Energy	18.45%	11.16%	3.31%

86.7% of Black Hills shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.9% of Alliant Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Black Hills shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Alliant Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Alliant Energy had 12 more articles in the media than Black Hills. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Alliant Energy and 6 mentions for Black Hills. Black Hills' average media sentiment score of 1.60 beat Alliant Energy's score of 0.92 indicating that Black Hills is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Black Hills	5 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Alliant Energy	7 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Alliant Energy beats Black Hills on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Black Hills compare to NorthWestern?

NorthWestern (NASDAQ:NWE) and Black Hills (NYSE:BKH) are both mid-cap utilities companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Black Hills has a net margin of 13.01% compared to NorthWestern's net margin of 10.13%. NorthWestern's return on equity of 8.03% beat Black Hills' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
NorthWestern	10.13%	8.03%	2.73%
Black Hills	13.01%	7.98%	2.93%

NorthWestern presently has a consensus target price of $73.30, indicating a potential upside of 5.54%. Black Hills has a consensus target price of $81.67, indicating a potential upside of 13.88%. Given Black Hills' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Black Hills is more favorable than NorthWestern.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
NorthWestern	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Black Hills	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

In the previous week, Black Hills had 6 more articles in the media than NorthWestern. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Black Hills and 0 mentions for NorthWestern. Black Hills' average media sentiment score of 1.60 beat NorthWestern's score of 0.55 indicating that Black Hills is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
NorthWestern	Positive
Black Hills	Very Positive

Black Hills has higher revenue and earnings than NorthWestern. Black Hills is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NorthWestern, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
NorthWestern	$1.61B	2.65	$181.09M	$2.77	25.07
Black Hills	$2.31B	2.37	$291.60M	$3.96	18.11

NorthWestern pays an annual dividend of $2.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Black Hills pays an annual dividend of $2.81 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. NorthWestern pays out 96.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Black Hills pays out 71.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. NorthWestern has raised its dividend for 21 consecutive years and Black Hills has raised its dividend for 55 consecutive years. Black Hills is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

NorthWestern has a beta of 0.34, meaning that its share price is 66% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Black Hills has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

96.1% of NorthWestern shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.7% of Black Hills shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of NorthWestern shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Black Hills shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Black Hills beats NorthWestern on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Black Hills compare to Ameren?

Black Hills (NYSE:BKH) and Ameren (NYSE:AEE) are both utilities companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, risk and earnings.

Ameren has a net margin of 17.86% compared to Black Hills' net margin of 13.01%. Ameren's return on equity of 10.95% beat Black Hills' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Black Hills	13.01%	7.98%	2.93%
Ameren	17.86%	10.95%	3.00%

Ameren has higher revenue and earnings than Black Hills. Black Hills is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ameren, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Black Hills	$2.31B	2.37	$291.60M	$3.96	18.11
Ameren	$8.80B	3.34	$1.46B	$5.68	18.69

86.7% of Black Hills shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.1% of Ameren shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Black Hills shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Ameren shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Ameren had 22 more articles in the media than Black Hills. MarketBeat recorded 28 mentions for Ameren and 6 mentions for Black Hills. Black Hills' average media sentiment score of 1.60 beat Ameren's score of 0.99 indicating that Black Hills is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Black Hills	5 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Ameren	17 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Black Hills has a beta of 0.71, indicating that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ameren has a beta of 0.47, indicating that its share price is 53% less volatile than the broader market.

Black Hills pays an annual dividend of $2.81 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Ameren pays an annual dividend of $3.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Black Hills pays out 71.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ameren pays out 52.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Black Hills has raised its dividend for 55 consecutive years and Ameren has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years. Black Hills is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Black Hills currently has a consensus price target of $81.67, indicating a potential upside of 13.88%. Ameren has a consensus price target of $121.42, indicating a potential upside of 14.39%. Given Ameren's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Ameren is more favorable than Black Hills.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Black Hills	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Ameren	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.77

Summary

Ameren beats Black Hills on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Black Hills compare to Avista?

Avista (NYSE:AVA) and Black Hills (NYSE:BKH) are both mid-cap utilities companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

Avista pays an annual dividend of $1.97 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.2%. Black Hills pays an annual dividend of $2.81 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Avista pays out 71.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Black Hills pays out 71.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Avista has raised its dividend for 23 consecutive years and Black Hills has raised its dividend for 55 consecutive years.

85.2% of Avista shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.7% of Black Hills shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Avista shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Black Hills shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Black Hills has higher revenue and earnings than Avista. Avista is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Black Hills, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Avista	$1.96B	1.60	$193M	$2.77	13.58
Black Hills	$2.31B	2.37	$291.60M	$3.96	18.11

In the previous week, Black Hills had 3 more articles in the media than Avista. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Black Hills and 3 mentions for Avista. Black Hills' average media sentiment score of 1.60 beat Avista's score of 1.48 indicating that Black Hills is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Avista	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Black Hills	5 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

Avista has a beta of 0.25, meaning that its stock price is 75% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Black Hills has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

Black Hills has a net margin of 13.01% compared to Avista's net margin of 11.83%. Black Hills' return on equity of 7.98% beat Avista's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Avista	11.83%	7.85%	2.57%
Black Hills	13.01%	7.98%	2.93%

Avista currently has a consensus price target of $39.25, suggesting a potential upside of 4.33%. Black Hills has a consensus price target of $81.67, suggesting a potential upside of 13.88%. Given Black Hills' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Black Hills is more favorable than Avista.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Avista	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.14
Black Hills	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

Black Hills beats Avista on 17 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Black Hills News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BKH and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

BKH vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Black Hills	Multi Industry	Utilities Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$5.47B	$21.74B	$15.92B	$24.31B
Dividend Yield	3.92%	3.81%	4.04%	3.70%
P/E Ratio	18.11	26.61	24.84	30.31
Price / Sales	2.37	16.51	373.02	20.99
Price / Cash	9.11	11.11	18.69	32.49
Price / Book	1.36	1.90	2.23	6.77
Net Income	$291.60M	$269.64M	$701.43M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-3.53%	-1.46%	-1.25%	-0.65%
1 Month Performance	-4.49%	-4.51%	-2.75%	3.38%
1 Year Performance	17.65%	14.66%	8.24%	14.90%

Black Hills Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
BKH Black Hills	4.4469 of 5 stars	$71.71 -2.2%	$81.67 +13.9%	+17.7%	$5.47B	$2.31B	18.11	2,795	Positive News
EVRG Evergy	4.4626 of 5 stars	$83.93 -0.1%	$90.60 +7.9%	+11.9%	$19.37B	$5.96B	21.30	4,691	News Coverage Positive News Ex-Dividend
LNT Alliant Energy	4.1882 of 5 stars	$70.35 -0.4%	$76.82 +9.2%	+1.3%	$18.31B	$4.36B	22.26	2,948	Trending News Analyst Revision
NWE NorthWestern	3.1459 of 5 stars	$70.82 -1.4%	$73.30 +3.5%	+18.8%	$4.42B	$1.61B	25.57	1,667	Positive News
AEE Ameren	4.8179 of 5 stars	$109.52 -0.2%	$121.75 +11.2%	+4.1%	$30.38B	$8.80B	19.28	8,913	News Coverage Positive News Dividend Announcement Analyst Forecast

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:BKH) was last updated on 8/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Black Hills (BKH) Competitors