Which has higher earnings & valuation, EVRG or BKH?

Evergy has higher revenue and earnings than Black Hills. Black Hills is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Evergy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Evergy $5.96B 3.05 $855.60M $3.94 20.00 Black Hills $2.31B 2.32 $291.60M $3.96 17.72

Is EVRG or BKH more profitable?

Evergy has a net margin of 15.19% compared to Black Hills' net margin of 13.01%. Evergy's return on equity of 9.20% beat Black Hills' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Evergy 15.19% 9.20% 2.76% Black Hills 13.01% 7.98% 2.93%

Does the media favor EVRG or BKH?

In the previous week, Black Hills had 4 more articles in the media than Evergy. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Black Hills and 1 mentions for Evergy. Black Hills' average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat Evergy's score of 0.51 indicating that Black Hills is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Evergy 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Black Hills 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has higher earnings and valuation, LNT or BKH?

Alliant Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Black Hills. Black Hills is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Alliant Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Alliant Energy $4.36B 3.79 $810M $3.16 20.16 Black Hills $2.31B 2.32 $291.60M $3.96 17.72

Does the media refer more to LNT or BKH?

In the previous week, Alliant Energy and Alliant Energy both had 5 articles in the media. Black Hills' average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat Alliant Energy's score of 0.64 indicating that Black Hills is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Alliant Energy 1 Very Positive mention(s) 4 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Black Hills 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, BKH or NWE?

Black Hills has higher revenue and earnings than NorthWestern. Black Hills is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NorthWestern, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Black Hills $2.31B 2.32 $291.60M $3.96 17.72 NorthWestern $1.61B 2.62 $181.09M $2.77 24.74

Does the media refer more to BKH or NWE?

In the previous week, Black Hills had 3 more articles in the media than NorthWestern. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Black Hills and 2 mentions for NorthWestern. Black Hills' average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat NorthWestern's score of 0.67 indicating that Black Hills is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Black Hills 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive NorthWestern 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, AEE or BKH?

Ameren has higher revenue and earnings than Black Hills. Ameren is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Black Hills, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Ameren $8.80B 3.13 $1.46B $5.68 17.51 Black Hills $2.31B 2.32 $291.60M $3.96 17.72

Is AEE or BKH more profitable?

Ameren has a net margin of 17.86% compared to Black Hills' net margin of 13.01%. Ameren's return on equity of 10.95% beat Black Hills' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Ameren 17.86% 10.95% 3.00% Black Hills 13.01% 7.98% 2.93%

Does the media favor AEE or BKH?

In the previous week, Ameren had 5 more articles in the media than Black Hills. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Ameren and 5 mentions for Black Hills. Black Hills' average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat Ameren's score of -0.19 indicating that Black Hills is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Ameren 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 4 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Black Hills 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, BKH or AVA?

Black Hills has higher revenue and earnings than Avista. Avista is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Black Hills, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Black Hills $2.31B 2.32 $291.60M $3.96 17.72 Avista $1.96B 1.49 $193M $2.77 12.65

Is BKH or AVA more profitable?

Black Hills has a net margin of 13.01% compared to Avista's net margin of 11.83%. Black Hills' return on equity of 7.98% beat Avista's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Black Hills 13.01% 7.98% 2.93% Avista 11.83% 7.85% 2.57%

Does the media refer more to BKH or AVA?

In the previous week, Black Hills had 2 more articles in the media than Avista. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Black Hills and 3 mentions for Avista. Black Hills' average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat Avista's score of 0.06 indicating that Black Hills is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Black Hills 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Avista 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Black Hills (BKH) Competitors

$70.16 +0.08 (+0.12%)

Closing price 10/1/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$70.16 -0.01 (-0.01%)

As of 07:38 AM Eastern

Compare

BKH vs. EVRG, LNT, NWE, AEE, and AVA

Should you buy Black Hills stock or one of its competitors? Black Hills's main competitors and comparable companies include Evergy (EVRG), Alliant Energy (LNT), NorthWestern (NWE), Ameren (AEE), and Avista (AVA). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "utilities" sector.

How does Black Hills compare to Evergy?

Evergy (NASDAQ:EVRG) and Black Hills (NYSE:BKH) are both utilities companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, risk, profitability and dividends.

Evergy currently has a consensus price target of $90.60, indicating a potential upside of 14.99%. Black Hills has a consensus price target of $81.29, indicating a potential upside of 15.85%. Given Black Hills' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Black Hills is more favorable than Evergy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Evergy	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.73
Black Hills	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.86

Evergy pays an annual dividend of $2.78 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Black Hills pays an annual dividend of $2.81 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Evergy pays out 70.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Black Hills pays out 71.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Evergy has increased its dividend for 20 consecutive years and Black Hills has increased its dividend for 55 consecutive years. Black Hills is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

87.2% of Evergy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.7% of Black Hills shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Evergy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Black Hills shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Black Hills had 4 more articles in the media than Evergy. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Black Hills and 1 mentions for Evergy. Black Hills' average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat Evergy's score of 0.51 indicating that Black Hills is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Evergy	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Black Hills	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Evergy has a beta of 0.5, indicating that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Black Hills has a beta of 0.68, indicating that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

Evergy has higher revenue and earnings than Black Hills. Black Hills is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Evergy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Evergy	$5.96B	3.05	$855.60M	$3.94	20.00
Black Hills	$2.31B	2.32	$291.60M	$3.96	17.72

Evergy has a net margin of 15.19% compared to Black Hills' net margin of 13.01%. Evergy's return on equity of 9.20% beat Black Hills' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Evergy	15.19%	9.20%	2.76%
Black Hills	13.01%	7.98%	2.93%

Summary

Evergy beats Black Hills on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Black Hills compare to Alliant Energy?

Alliant Energy (NASDAQ:LNT) and Black Hills (NYSE:BKH) are both utilities companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, profitability, valuation and earnings.

In the previous week, Alliant Energy and Alliant Energy both had 5 articles in the media. Black Hills' average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat Alliant Energy's score of 0.64 indicating that Black Hills is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Alliant Energy	1 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Black Hills	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

79.9% of Alliant Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.7% of Black Hills shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Alliant Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Black Hills shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Alliant Energy presently has a consensus target price of $77.00, suggesting a potential upside of 20.86%. Black Hills has a consensus target price of $81.29, suggesting a potential upside of 15.85%. Given Alliant Energy's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Alliant Energy is more favorable than Black Hills.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Alliant Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.64
Black Hills	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.86

Alliant Energy has a net margin of 18.45% compared to Black Hills' net margin of 13.01%. Alliant Energy's return on equity of 11.16% beat Black Hills' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Alliant Energy	18.45%	11.16%	3.31%
Black Hills	13.01%	7.98%	2.93%

Alliant Energy pays an annual dividend of $2.14 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Black Hills pays an annual dividend of $2.81 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Alliant Energy pays out 67.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Black Hills pays out 71.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Alliant Energy has raised its dividend for 22 consecutive years and Black Hills has raised its dividend for 55 consecutive years. Black Hills is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Alliant Energy has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Black Hills has a beta of 0.68, indicating that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

Alliant Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Black Hills. Black Hills is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Alliant Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Alliant Energy	$4.36B	3.79	$810M	$3.16	20.16
Black Hills	$2.31B	2.32	$291.60M	$3.96	17.72

Summary

Alliant Energy beats Black Hills on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Black Hills compare to NorthWestern?

Black Hills (NYSE:BKH) and NorthWestern (NASDAQ:NWE) are both mid-cap utilities companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Black Hills has a beta of 0.68, suggesting that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NorthWestern has a beta of 0.3, suggesting that its stock price is 70% less volatile than the broader market.

Black Hills presently has a consensus target price of $81.29, indicating a potential upside of 15.85%. NorthWestern has a consensus target price of $72.70, indicating a potential upside of 6.08%. Given Black Hills' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Black Hills is more favorable than NorthWestern.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Black Hills	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.86
NorthWestern	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Black Hills has a net margin of 13.01% compared to NorthWestern's net margin of 10.13%. NorthWestern's return on equity of 8.03% beat Black Hills' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Black Hills	13.01%	7.98%	2.93%
NorthWestern	10.13%	8.03%	2.73%

Black Hills pays an annual dividend of $2.81 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. NorthWestern pays an annual dividend of $2.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Black Hills pays out 71.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. NorthWestern pays out 96.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Black Hills has raised its dividend for 55 consecutive years and NorthWestern has raised its dividend for 21 consecutive years. Black Hills is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

86.7% of Black Hills shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.1% of NorthWestern shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Black Hills shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of NorthWestern shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Black Hills has higher revenue and earnings than NorthWestern. Black Hills is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NorthWestern, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Black Hills	$2.31B	2.32	$291.60M	$3.96	17.72
NorthWestern	$1.61B	2.62	$181.09M	$2.77	24.74

In the previous week, Black Hills had 3 more articles in the media than NorthWestern. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Black Hills and 2 mentions for NorthWestern. Black Hills' average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat NorthWestern's score of 0.67 indicating that Black Hills is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Black Hills	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
NorthWestern	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Black Hills beats NorthWestern on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Black Hills compare to Ameren?

Ameren (NYSE:AEE) and Black Hills (NYSE:BKH) are both utilities companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Ameren has a beta of 0.44, meaning that its share price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Black Hills has a beta of 0.68, meaning that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

Ameren has higher revenue and earnings than Black Hills. Ameren is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Black Hills, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ameren	$8.80B	3.13	$1.46B	$5.68	17.51
Black Hills	$2.31B	2.32	$291.60M	$3.96	17.72

Ameren pays an annual dividend of $3.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Black Hills pays an annual dividend of $2.81 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Ameren pays out 52.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Black Hills pays out 71.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Ameren has increased its dividend for 12 consecutive years and Black Hills has increased its dividend for 55 consecutive years. Black Hills is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

79.1% of Ameren shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.7% of Black Hills shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Ameren shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Black Hills shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Ameren had 5 more articles in the media than Black Hills. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Ameren and 5 mentions for Black Hills. Black Hills' average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat Ameren's score of -0.19 indicating that Black Hills is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ameren	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	4 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Black Hills	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Ameren presently has a consensus price target of $118.08, indicating a potential upside of 18.72%. Black Hills has a consensus price target of $81.29, indicating a potential upside of 15.85%. Given Ameren's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Ameren is more favorable than Black Hills.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ameren	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.71
Black Hills	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.86

Ameren has a net margin of 17.86% compared to Black Hills' net margin of 13.01%. Ameren's return on equity of 10.95% beat Black Hills' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ameren	17.86%	10.95%	3.00%
Black Hills	13.01%	7.98%	2.93%

Summary

Ameren beats Black Hills on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Black Hills compare to Avista?

Black Hills (NYSE:BKH) and Avista (NYSE:AVA) are both mid-cap utilities companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Black Hills had 2 more articles in the media than Avista. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Black Hills and 3 mentions for Avista. Black Hills' average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat Avista's score of 0.06 indicating that Black Hills is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Black Hills	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Avista	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Black Hills has higher revenue and earnings than Avista. Avista is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Black Hills, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Black Hills	$2.31B	2.32	$291.60M	$3.96	17.72
Avista	$1.96B	1.49	$193M	$2.77	12.65

86.7% of Black Hills shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.2% of Avista shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Black Hills shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Avista shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Black Hills currently has a consensus target price of $81.29, indicating a potential upside of 15.85%. Avista has a consensus target price of $39.25, indicating a potential upside of 12.01%. Given Black Hills' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Black Hills is more favorable than Avista.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Black Hills	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.86
Avista	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.14

Black Hills has a net margin of 13.01% compared to Avista's net margin of 11.83%. Black Hills' return on equity of 7.98% beat Avista's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Black Hills	13.01%	7.98%	2.93%
Avista	11.83%	7.85%	2.57%

Black Hills has a beta of 0.68, suggesting that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Avista has a beta of 0.23, suggesting that its stock price is 77% less volatile than the broader market.

Black Hills pays an annual dividend of $2.81 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Avista pays an annual dividend of $1.97 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.6%. Black Hills pays out 71.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Avista pays out 71.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Black Hills has increased its dividend for 55 consecutive years and Avista has increased its dividend for 23 consecutive years.

Summary

Black Hills beats Avista on 17 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Black Hills News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BKH and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

BKH vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Black Hills	Multi Industry	Utilities Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$5.34B	$20.69B	$15.02B	$22.64B
Dividend Yield	4.01%	4.01%	4.11%	3.74%
P/E Ratio	17.72	25.69	23.71	27.58
Price / Sales	2.32	16.14	418.81	20.54
Price / Cash	8.91	10.76	18.36	39.56
Price / Book	1.36	1.83	2.10	4.62
Net Income	$291.60M	$269.64M	$701.43M	$1.08B
7 Day Performance	-0.70%	0.36%	-0.36%	-1.52%
1 Month Performance	-3.39%	-2.72%	-3.31%	-5.48%
1 Year Performance	17.48%	8.83%	2.36%	5.05%

Black Hills Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
BKH Black Hills	4.2707 of 5 stars	$70.16 +0.1%	$81.29 +15.9%	+16.1%	$5.34B	$2.31B	17.72	2,795	Analyst Forecast
EVRG Evergy	4.2826 of 5 stars	$77.91 -0.2%	$90.60 +16.3%	+3.4%	$17.99B	$5.96B	19.77	4,691
LNT Alliant Energy	4.3713 of 5 stars	$63.21 -0.6%	$77.00 +21.8%	-5.1%	$16.49B	$4.36B	20.00	2,948
NWE NorthWestern	2.8155 of 5 stars	$68.06 -1.1%	$72.70 +6.8%	+19.1%	$4.23B	$1.61B	24.57	1,667
AEE Ameren	4.7176 of 5 stars	$99.47 +0.1%	$120.17 +20.8%	-3.9%	$27.52B	$8.80B	17.51	8,913	Analyst Forecast

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:BKH) was last updated on 10/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Black Hills (BKH) Competitors