New Jersey Resources Competitors

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (NYSE:BIP) and New Jersey Resources (NYSE:NJR) are both utilities companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

Dividends

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners pays an annual dividend of $1.94 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. New Jersey Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.33 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Brookfield Infrastructure Partners pays out 2,771.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. New Jersey Resources pays out 64.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Brookfield Infrastructure Partners has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and New Jersey Resources has increased its dividend for 9 consecutive years.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Brookfield Infrastructure Partners and New Jersey Resources' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners has higher revenue and earnings than New Jersey Resources. New Jersey Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brookfield Infrastructure Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Brookfield Infrastructure Partners and New Jersey Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Brookfield Infrastructure Partners and New Jersey Resources, as reported by MarketBeat.

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners currently has a consensus price target of $56.20, suggesting a potential upside of 8.77%. New Jersey Resources has a consensus price target of $37.75, suggesting a potential downside of 6.14%. Given Brookfield Infrastructure Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Brookfield Infrastructure Partners is more favorable than New Jersey Resources.

Volatility & Risk

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners has a beta of 0.83, suggesting that its share price is 17% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, New Jersey Resources has a beta of 0.46, suggesting that its share price is 54% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

50.2% of Brookfield Infrastructure Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.7% of New Jersey Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of New Jersey Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

New Jersey Resources beats Brookfield Infrastructure Partners on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Avangrid (NYSE:AGR) and New Jersey Resources (NYSE:NJR) are both utilities companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, risk, dividends and earnings.

Dividends

Avangrid pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. New Jersey Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.33 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Avangrid pays out 81.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. New Jersey Resources pays out 64.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Avangrid has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and New Jersey Resources has increased its dividend for 9 consecutive years.

Profitability

This table compares Avangrid and New Jersey Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations for Avangrid and New Jersey Resources, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Avangrid currently has a consensus target price of $54.25, suggesting a potential upside of 17.73%. New Jersey Resources has a consensus target price of $37.75, suggesting a potential downside of 6.14%. Given Avangrid's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Avangrid is more favorable than New Jersey Resources.

Risk and Volatility

Avangrid has a beta of 0.21, meaning that its share price is 79% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, New Jersey Resources has a beta of 0.46, meaning that its share price is 54% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

13.7% of Avangrid shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.7% of New Jersey Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Avangrid shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of New Jersey Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Avangrid and New Jersey Resources' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Avangrid has higher revenue and earnings than New Jersey Resources. New Jersey Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Avangrid, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Avangrid beats New Jersey Resources on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

New Jersey Resources (NYSE:NJR) and Telefônica Brasil (NYSE:VIV) are both utilities companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability and earnings.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for New Jersey Resources and Telefônica Brasil, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

New Jersey Resources currently has a consensus target price of $37.75, suggesting a potential downside of 6.14%. Telefônica Brasil has a consensus target price of $10.75, suggesting a potential upside of 34.71%. Given Telefônica Brasil's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Telefônica Brasil is more favorable than New Jersey Resources.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares New Jersey Resources and Telefônica Brasil's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Telefônica Brasil has higher revenue and earnings than New Jersey Resources. Telefônica Brasil is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than New Jersey Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

New Jersey Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.33 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Telefônica Brasil pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.5%. New Jersey Resources pays out 64.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Telefônica Brasil pays out 98.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. New Jersey Resources has raised its dividend for 9 consecutive years.

Profitability

This table compares New Jersey Resources and Telefônica Brasil's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

71.7% of New Jersey Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.9% of Telefônica Brasil shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of New Jersey Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

New Jersey Resources (NYSE:NJR) and Korea Electric Power (NYSE:KEP) are both utilities companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, valuation, profitability, risk and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares New Jersey Resources and Korea Electric Power's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

71.7% of New Jersey Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.8% of Korea Electric Power shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of New Jersey Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Korea Electric Power shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings for New Jersey Resources and Korea Electric Power, as provided by MarketBeat.

New Jersey Resources presently has a consensus target price of $37.75, indicating a potential downside of 6.14%. Given New Jersey Resources' higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe New Jersey Resources is more favorable than Korea Electric Power.

Risk and Volatility

New Jersey Resources has a beta of 0.46, suggesting that its share price is 54% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Korea Electric Power has a beta of 0.86, suggesting that its share price is 14% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares New Jersey Resources and Korea Electric Power's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

New Jersey Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Korea Electric Power. Korea Electric Power is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than New Jersey Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

New Jersey Resources beats Korea Electric Power on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

New Jersey Resources (NYSE:NJR) and Alliant Energy (NASDAQ:LNT) are both utilities companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends and valuation.

Dividends

New Jersey Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.33 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Alliant Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.61 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. New Jersey Resources pays out 64.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Alliant Energy pays out 69.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. New Jersey Resources has increased its dividend for 9 consecutive years and Alliant Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for New Jersey Resources and Alliant Energy, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

New Jersey Resources presently has a consensus price target of $37.75, suggesting a potential downside of 6.14%. Alliant Energy has a consensus price target of $56.1667, suggesting a potential upside of 16.07%. Given Alliant Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Alliant Energy is more favorable than New Jersey Resources.

Profitability

This table compares New Jersey Resources and Alliant Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares New Jersey Resources and Alliant Energy's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Alliant Energy has higher revenue and earnings than New Jersey Resources. New Jersey Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Alliant Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

New Jersey Resources has a beta of 0.46, suggesting that its share price is 54% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Alliant Energy has a beta of 0.29, suggesting that its share price is 71% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

71.7% of New Jersey Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.0% of Alliant Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of New Jersey Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Alliant Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Alliant Energy beats New Jersey Resources on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Atmos Energy (NYSE:ATO) and New Jersey Resources (NYSE:NJR) are both utilities companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares Atmos Energy and New Jersey Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Atmos Energy has a beta of 0.3, suggesting that its share price is 70% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, New Jersey Resources has a beta of 0.46, suggesting that its share price is 54% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Atmos Energy pays an annual dividend of $2.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. New Jersey Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.33 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Atmos Energy pays out 53.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. New Jersey Resources pays out 64.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Atmos Energy has raised its dividend for 34 consecutive years and New Jersey Resources has raised its dividend for 9 consecutive years.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

86.4% of Atmos Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.7% of New Jersey Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Atmos Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of New Jersey Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Atmos Energy and New Jersey Resources' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Atmos Energy has higher revenue and earnings than New Jersey Resources. Atmos Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than New Jersey Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for Atmos Energy and New Jersey Resources, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Atmos Energy presently has a consensus price target of $109.4167, indicating a potential upside of 19.31%. New Jersey Resources has a consensus price target of $37.75, indicating a potential downside of 6.14%. Given Atmos Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Atmos Energy is more favorable than New Jersey Resources.

Summary

Atmos Energy beats New Jersey Resources on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.