Does the media prefer LNT or CPK?

In the previous week, Alliant Energy had 8 more articles in the media than Chesapeake Utilities. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Alliant Energy and 5 mentions for Chesapeake Utilities. Chesapeake Utilities' average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Alliant Energy's score of 0.29 indicating that Chesapeake Utilities is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Alliant Energy 1 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Chesapeake Utilities 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor ATO or CPK?

In the previous week, Chesapeake Utilities had 2 more articles in the media than Atmos Energy. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Chesapeake Utilities and 3 mentions for Atmos Energy. Atmos Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Chesapeake Utilities' score of 0.63 indicating that Atmos Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Atmos Energy 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Chesapeake Utilities 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to CPK or AVA?

In the previous week, Chesapeake Utilities had 2 more articles in the media than Avista. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Chesapeake Utilities and 3 mentions for Avista. Avista's average media sentiment score of 1.70 beat Chesapeake Utilities' score of 0.63 indicating that Avista is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Chesapeake Utilities 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Avista 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Does the media favor CPK or BKH?

In the previous week, Chesapeake Utilities had 1 more articles in the media than Black Hills. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Chesapeake Utilities and 4 mentions for Black Hills. Chesapeake Utilities' average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Black Hills' score of 0.50 indicating that Chesapeake Utilities is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Chesapeake Utilities 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Black Hills 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) Competitors

$123.40 +0.34 (+0.28%)

Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$123.05 -0.35 (-0.28%)

As of 05:40 PM Eastern

Compare

CPK vs. LNT, NWE, ATO, AVA, and BKH

Should you buy Chesapeake Utilities stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Chesapeake Utilities with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Chesapeake Utilities include Alliant Energy (LNT), NorthWestern (NWE), Atmos Energy (ATO), Avista (AVA), and Black Hills (BKH). These companies are all part of the "utilities" sector.

How does Chesapeake Utilities compare to Alliant Energy?

Alliant Energy (NASDAQ:LNT) and Chesapeake Utilities (NYSE:CPK) are both utilities companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends and media sentiment.

Alliant Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Chesapeake Utilities. Chesapeake Utilities is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Alliant Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Alliant Energy	$4.36B	4.24	$810M	$3.19	22.45
Chesapeake Utilities	$930M	3.18	$140.30M	$6.24	19.78

Alliant Energy has a net margin of 18.58% compared to Chesapeake Utilities' net margin of 15.11%. Alliant Energy's return on equity of 11.37% beat Chesapeake Utilities' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Alliant Energy	18.58%	11.37%	3.38%
Chesapeake Utilities	15.11%	9.53%	3.81%

In the previous week, Alliant Energy had 8 more articles in the media than Chesapeake Utilities. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Alliant Energy and 5 mentions for Chesapeake Utilities. Chesapeake Utilities' average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Alliant Energy's score of 0.29 indicating that Chesapeake Utilities is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Alliant Energy	1 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Chesapeake Utilities	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Alliant Energy has a beta of 0.58, meaning that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chesapeake Utilities has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

Alliant Energy pays an annual dividend of $2.14 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Chesapeake Utilities pays an annual dividend of $2.74 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Alliant Energy pays out 67.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Chesapeake Utilities pays out 43.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Alliant Energy has raised its dividend for 22 consecutive years and Chesapeake Utilities has raised its dividend for 22 consecutive years.

Alliant Energy presently has a consensus target price of $76.60, suggesting a potential upside of 6.97%. Chesapeake Utilities has a consensus target price of $137.00, suggesting a potential upside of 11.02%. Given Chesapeake Utilities' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Chesapeake Utilities is more favorable than Alliant Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Alliant Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.69
Chesapeake Utilities	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

79.9% of Alliant Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.1% of Chesapeake Utilities shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Alliant Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Chesapeake Utilities shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Alliant Energy beats Chesapeake Utilities on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chesapeake Utilities compare to NorthWestern?

NorthWestern (NASDAQ:NWE) and Chesapeake Utilities (NYSE:CPK) are both mid-cap utilities companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability and media sentiment.

NorthWestern has a beta of 0.35, indicating that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chesapeake Utilities has a beta of 0.71, indicating that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

96.1% of NorthWestern shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.1% of Chesapeake Utilities shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of NorthWestern shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Chesapeake Utilities shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

NorthWestern currently has a consensus target price of $68.30, suggesting a potential downside of 3.27%. Chesapeake Utilities has a consensus target price of $137.00, suggesting a potential upside of 11.02%. Given Chesapeake Utilities' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Chesapeake Utilities is more favorable than NorthWestern.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
NorthWestern	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Chesapeake Utilities	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

NorthWestern pays an annual dividend of $2.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Chesapeake Utilities pays an annual dividend of $2.74 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. NorthWestern pays out 98.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Chesapeake Utilities pays out 43.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. NorthWestern has raised its dividend for 21 consecutive years and Chesapeake Utilities has raised its dividend for 22 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Chesapeake Utilities had 4 more articles in the media than NorthWestern. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Chesapeake Utilities and 1 mentions for NorthWestern. NorthWestern's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Chesapeake Utilities' score of 0.63 indicating that NorthWestern is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
NorthWestern	Very Positive
Chesapeake Utilities	Positive

Chesapeake Utilities has a net margin of 15.11% compared to NorthWestern's net margin of 10.21%. Chesapeake Utilities' return on equity of 9.53% beat NorthWestern's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
NorthWestern	10.21%	7.80%	2.69%
Chesapeake Utilities	15.11%	9.53%	3.81%

NorthWestern has higher revenue and earnings than Chesapeake Utilities. Chesapeake Utilities is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NorthWestern, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
NorthWestern	$1.61B	2.70	$181.09M	$2.72	25.96
Chesapeake Utilities	$930M	3.18	$140.30M	$6.24	19.78

Summary

Chesapeake Utilities beats NorthWestern on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chesapeake Utilities compare to Atmos Energy?

Atmos Energy (NYSE:ATO) and Chesapeake Utilities (NYSE:CPK) are both utilities companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, risk, earnings, dividends and media sentiment.

Atmos Energy has a net margin of 27.58% compared to Chesapeake Utilities' net margin of 15.11%. Atmos Energy's return on equity of 9.59% beat Chesapeake Utilities' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Atmos Energy	27.58%	9.59%	4.64%
Chesapeake Utilities	15.11%	9.53%	3.81%

90.2% of Atmos Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.1% of Chesapeake Utilities shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Atmos Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Chesapeake Utilities shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Atmos Energy has a beta of 0.65, meaning that its share price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chesapeake Utilities has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

Atmos Energy currently has a consensus target price of $181.90, indicating a potential upside of 7.66%. Chesapeake Utilities has a consensus target price of $137.00, indicating a potential upside of 11.02%. Given Chesapeake Utilities' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Chesapeake Utilities is more favorable than Atmos Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Atmos Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	10 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.09
Chesapeake Utilities	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

Atmos Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Chesapeake Utilities pays an annual dividend of $2.74 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Atmos Energy pays out 49.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Chesapeake Utilities pays out 43.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Atmos Energy has raised its dividend for 41 consecutive years and Chesapeake Utilities has raised its dividend for 22 consecutive years. Atmos Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Atmos Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Chesapeake Utilities. Chesapeake Utilities is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Atmos Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Atmos Energy	$4.70B	6.00	$1.20B	$8.14	20.76
Chesapeake Utilities	$930M	3.18	$140.30M	$6.24	19.78

In the previous week, Chesapeake Utilities had 2 more articles in the media than Atmos Energy. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Chesapeake Utilities and 3 mentions for Atmos Energy. Atmos Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Chesapeake Utilities' score of 0.63 indicating that Atmos Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Atmos Energy	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Chesapeake Utilities	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Atmos Energy beats Chesapeake Utilities on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chesapeake Utilities compare to Avista?

Chesapeake Utilities (NYSE:CPK) and Avista (NYSE:AVA) are both mid-cap utilities companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

Avista has higher revenue and earnings than Chesapeake Utilities. Avista is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chesapeake Utilities, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Chesapeake Utilities	$930M	3.18	$140.30M	$6.24	19.78
Avista	$1.96B	1.75	$193M	$2.51	16.53

Chesapeake Utilities pays an annual dividend of $2.74 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Avista pays an annual dividend of $1.97 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.7%. Chesapeake Utilities pays out 43.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Avista pays out 78.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Chesapeake Utilities has increased its dividend for 22 consecutive years and Avista has increased its dividend for 23 consecutive years. Avista is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Chesapeake Utilities had 2 more articles in the media than Avista. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Chesapeake Utilities and 3 mentions for Avista. Avista's average media sentiment score of 1.70 beat Chesapeake Utilities' score of 0.63 indicating that Avista is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Chesapeake Utilities	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Avista	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

Chesapeake Utilities has a net margin of 15.11% compared to Avista's net margin of 10.75%. Chesapeake Utilities' return on equity of 9.53% beat Avista's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Chesapeake Utilities	15.11%	9.53%	3.81%
Avista	10.75%	7.65%	2.50%

Chesapeake Utilities presently has a consensus target price of $137.00, suggesting a potential upside of 11.02%. Avista has a consensus target price of $40.00, suggesting a potential downside of 3.57%. Given Chesapeake Utilities' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Chesapeake Utilities is more favorable than Avista.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Chesapeake Utilities	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
Avista	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.14

83.1% of Chesapeake Utilities shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.2% of Avista shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of Chesapeake Utilities shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Avista shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Chesapeake Utilities has a beta of 0.71, suggesting that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Avista has a beta of 0.24, suggesting that its stock price is 76% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Chesapeake Utilities beats Avista on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chesapeake Utilities compare to Black Hills?

Chesapeake Utilities (NYSE:CPK) and Black Hills (NYSE:BKH) are both mid-cap utilities companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, risk and media sentiment.

83.1% of Chesapeake Utilities shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.7% of Black Hills shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of Chesapeake Utilities shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Black Hills shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Chesapeake Utilities had 1 more articles in the media than Black Hills. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Chesapeake Utilities and 4 mentions for Black Hills. Chesapeake Utilities' average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Black Hills' score of 0.50 indicating that Chesapeake Utilities is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Chesapeake Utilities	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Black Hills	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Chesapeake Utilities has a beta of 0.71, suggesting that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Black Hills has a beta of 0.74, suggesting that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

Chesapeake Utilities currently has a consensus price target of $137.00, suggesting a potential upside of 11.02%. Black Hills has a consensus price target of $81.40, suggesting a potential upside of 11.75%. Given Black Hills' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Black Hills is more favorable than Chesapeake Utilities.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Chesapeake Utilities	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
Black Hills	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83

Chesapeake Utilities has a net margin of 15.11% compared to Black Hills' net margin of 12.61%. Chesapeake Utilities' return on equity of 9.53% beat Black Hills' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Chesapeake Utilities	15.11%	9.53%	3.81%
Black Hills	12.61%	7.77%	2.86%

Chesapeake Utilities pays an annual dividend of $2.74 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Black Hills pays an annual dividend of $2.81 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Chesapeake Utilities pays out 43.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Black Hills pays out 73.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Chesapeake Utilities has increased its dividend for 22 consecutive years and Black Hills has increased its dividend for 55 consecutive years. Black Hills is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Black Hills has higher revenue and earnings than Chesapeake Utilities. Black Hills is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chesapeake Utilities, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Chesapeake Utilities	$930M	3.18	$140.30M	$6.24	19.78
Black Hills	$2.31B	2.40	$291.60M	$3.84	18.97

Summary

Chesapeake Utilities beats Black Hills on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Chesapeake Utilities News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CPK and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CPK vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Chesapeake Utilities	UTIL Industry	Utilities Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$2.96B	$11.07B	$18.87B	$23.17B
Dividend Yield	2.18%	3.11%	3.84%	4.07%
P/E Ratio	19.78	12.22	20.33	30.97
Price / Sales	3.18	2.49	63.22	24.12
Price / Cash	11.97	9.84	19.54	24.96
Price / Book	1.79	1.59	2.19	4.79
Net Income	$140.30M	$472.46M	$781.06M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-2.45%	-3.81%	-0.21%	1.16%
1 Month Performance	-1.52%	-6.04%	0.10%	2.87%
1 Year Performance	1.48%	10.46%	18.47%	27.33%

Chesapeake Utilities Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CPK Chesapeake Utilities	4.407 of 5 stars	$123.40 +0.3%	$137.00 +11.0%	+2.0%	$2.96B	$930M	19.78	1,300	Insider Trade
LNT Alliant Energy	3.6836 of 5 stars	$73.28 +1.1%	$76.60 +4.5%	+17.6%	$18.73B	$4.36B	22.97	2,948	Analyst Revision
NWE NorthWestern	3.3932 of 5 stars	$71.79 +0.3%	$68.30 -4.9%	+30.1%	$4.40B	$1.61B	26.39	1,667	Positive News Analyst Forecast
ATO Atmos Energy	4.0673 of 5 stars	$177.35 +0.8%	$181.50 +2.3%	+12.6%	$29.38B	$4.70B	21.79	5,487	Ex-Dividend Analyst Upgrade
AVA Avista	3.6506 of 5 stars	$40.93 -0.6%	$40.00 -2.3%	+8.3%	$3.40B	$1.96B	16.31	1,929	Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:CPK) was last updated on 5/29/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) Competitors

CPK vs. LNT, NWE, ATO, AVA, and BKH

How does Chesapeake Utilities compare to Alliant Energy?

Summary

How does Chesapeake Utilities compare to NorthWestern?

Summary

How does Chesapeake Utilities compare to Atmos Energy?

Summary

How does Chesapeake Utilities compare to Avista?

Summary

How does Chesapeake Utilities compare to Black Hills?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CPK vs. The Competition

Chesapeake Utilities Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) Competitors

CPK vs. LNT, NWE, ATO, AVA, and BKH

How does Chesapeake Utilities compare to Alliant Energy?

Which has better valuation & earnings, LNT or CPK?

Is LNT or CPK more profitable?

Does the media prefer LNT or CPK?

Which has more volatility and risk, LNT or CPK?

Is LNT or CPK a better dividend stock?

Do analysts recommend LNT or CPK?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in LNT or CPK?

Summary

How does Chesapeake Utilities compare to NorthWestern?

Which has more risk & volatility, NWE or CPK?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of NWE or CPK?

Do analysts recommend NWE or CPK?

Is NWE or CPK a better dividend stock?

Does the media refer more to NWE or CPK?

Is NWE or CPK more profitable?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, NWE or CPK?

Summary

How does Chesapeake Utilities compare to Atmos Energy?

Is ATO or CPK more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in ATO or CPK?

Which has more risk and volatility, ATO or CPK?

Do analysts rate ATO or CPK?

Is ATO or CPK a better dividend stock?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, ATO or CPK?

Does the media favor ATO or CPK?

Summary

How does Chesapeake Utilities compare to Avista?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, CPK or AVA?

Is CPK or AVA a better dividend stock?

Does the media refer more to CPK or AVA?

Is CPK or AVA more profitable?

Do analysts rate CPK or AVA?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in CPK or AVA?

Which has more risk and volatility, CPK or AVA?

Summary

How does Chesapeake Utilities compare to Black Hills?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in CPK or BKH?

Does the media favor CPK or BKH?

Which has more volatility & risk, CPK or BKH?

Do analysts prefer CPK or BKH?

Is CPK or BKH more profitable?

Is CPK or BKH a better dividend stock?

Which has better earnings and valuation, CPK or BKH?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CPK vs. The Competition

Chesapeake Utilities Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools