Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) Competitors

Chesapeake Utilities presently has a consensus target price of $138.00, suggesting a potential upside of 3.98%. Atmos Energy has a consensus target price of $187.73, suggesting a potential upside of 12.16%. Given Atmos Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Atmos Energy is more favorable than Chesapeake Utilities.

Chesapeake Utilities has a beta of 0.67, suggesting that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Atmos Energy has a beta of 0.6, suggesting that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

Chesapeake Utilities pays an annual dividend of $2.94 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Atmos Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Chesapeake Utilities pays out 46.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Atmos Energy pays out 47.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Chesapeake Utilities has increased its dividend for 22 consecutive years and Atmos Energy has increased its dividend for 41 consecutive years. Atmos Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Atmos Energy had 4 more articles in the media than Chesapeake Utilities. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Atmos Energy and 5 mentions for Chesapeake Utilities. Atmos Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.35 beat Chesapeake Utilities' score of 1.00 indicating that Atmos Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

83.1% of Chesapeake Utilities shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.2% of Atmos Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of Chesapeake Utilities shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Atmos Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Atmos Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Chesapeake Utilities. Atmos Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chesapeake Utilities, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Atmos Energy has a net margin of 28.50% compared to Chesapeake Utilities' net margin of 15.12%. Atmos Energy's return on equity of 9.67% beat Chesapeake Utilities' return on equity.

Chesapeake Utilities has a net margin of 15.12% compared to Avista's net margin of 11.83%. Chesapeake Utilities' return on equity of 9.34% beat Avista's return on equity.

Avista has higher revenue and earnings than Chesapeake Utilities. Avista is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chesapeake Utilities, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Chesapeake Utilities pays an annual dividend of $2.94 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Avista pays an annual dividend of $1.97 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.3%. Chesapeake Utilities pays out 46.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Avista pays out 71.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Chesapeake Utilities has increased its dividend for 22 consecutive years and Avista has increased its dividend for 23 consecutive years. Avista is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Chesapeake Utilities has a beta of 0.67, suggesting that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Avista has a beta of 0.25, suggesting that its stock price is 75% less volatile than the broader market.

83.1% of Chesapeake Utilities shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.2% of Avista shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of Chesapeake Utilities shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Avista shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Chesapeake Utilities currently has a consensus price target of $138.00, suggesting a potential upside of 3.98%. Avista has a consensus price target of $39.25, suggesting a potential upside of 4.78%. Given Avista's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Avista is more favorable than Chesapeake Utilities.

In the previous week, Avista had 3 more articles in the media than Chesapeake Utilities. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Avista and 5 mentions for Chesapeake Utilities. Chesapeake Utilities' average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Avista's score of 0.97 indicating that Chesapeake Utilities is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Black Hills has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chesapeake Utilities has a beta of 0.67, meaning that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

86.7% of Black Hills shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.1% of Chesapeake Utilities shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Black Hills shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Chesapeake Utilities shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Black Hills pays an annual dividend of $2.81 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Chesapeake Utilities pays an annual dividend of $2.94 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Black Hills pays out 71.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Chesapeake Utilities pays out 46.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Black Hills has raised its dividend for 55 consecutive years and Chesapeake Utilities has raised its dividend for 22 consecutive years. Black Hills is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Black Hills presently has a consensus price target of $81.67, indicating a potential upside of 11.66%. Chesapeake Utilities has a consensus price target of $138.00, indicating a potential upside of 3.98%. Given Black Hills' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Black Hills is more favorable than Chesapeake Utilities.

In the previous week, Black Hills had 2 more articles in the media than Chesapeake Utilities. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Black Hills and 5 mentions for Chesapeake Utilities. Black Hills' average media sentiment score of 1.15 beat Chesapeake Utilities' score of 1.00 indicating that Black Hills is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Black Hills has higher revenue and earnings than Chesapeake Utilities. Black Hills is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chesapeake Utilities, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Chesapeake Utilities has a net margin of 15.12% compared to Black Hills' net margin of 13.01%. Chesapeake Utilities' return on equity of 9.34% beat Black Hills' return on equity.

83.1% of Chesapeake Utilities shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.0% of NewJersey Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of Chesapeake Utilities shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of NewJersey Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Chesapeake Utilities presently has a consensus target price of $138.00, indicating a potential upside of 3.98%. NewJersey Resources has a consensus target price of $57.83, indicating a potential upside of 8.40%. Given NewJersey Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe NewJersey Resources is more favorable than Chesapeake Utilities.

In the previous week, Chesapeake Utilities and Chesapeake Utilities both had 5 articles in the media. NewJersey Resources' average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Chesapeake Utilities' score of 1.00 indicating that NewJersey Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

NewJersey Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Chesapeake Utilities. NewJersey Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chesapeake Utilities, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Chesapeake Utilities has a beta of 0.67, indicating that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NewJersey Resources has a beta of 0.5, indicating that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

NewJersey Resources has a net margin of 16.42% compared to Chesapeake Utilities' net margin of 15.12%. NewJersey Resources' return on equity of 14.46% beat Chesapeake Utilities' return on equity.

Chesapeake Utilities pays an annual dividend of $2.94 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. NewJersey Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Chesapeake Utilities pays out 46.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. NewJersey Resources pays out 52.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Chesapeake Utilities has increased its dividend for 22 consecutive years and NewJersey Resources has increased its dividend for 29 consecutive years. NewJersey Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.