Free Trial

Templeton Emerging Markets Fund (EMF) Competitors

Templeton Emerging Markets Fund logo
$23.56 -0.22 (-0.93%)
Closing price 03:58 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$23.56 +0.00 (+0.00%)
As of 07:02 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

EMF vs. MUC, ASA, HQH, GSBD, and TYG

Should you buy Templeton Emerging Markets Fund stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Templeton Emerging Markets Fund with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Templeton Emerging Markets Fund include BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (MUC), ASA Gold and Precious Metals (ASA), abrdn Healthcare Investors (HQH), Goldman Sachs BDC (GSBD), and Tortoise Energy Infrastructure (TYG). These companies are all part of the "financial services" industry.

How does Templeton Emerging Markets Fund compare to BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund?

BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (NYSE:MUC) and Templeton Emerging Markets Fund (NYSE:EMF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality FundN/A N/A N/A
Templeton Emerging Markets Fund N/A N/A N/A

BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund has a beta of 0.65, suggesting that its share price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Templeton Emerging Markets Fund has a beta of 0.94, suggesting that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

31.0% of BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 49.9% of Templeton Emerging Markets Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. Templeton Emerging Markets Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality FundN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Templeton Emerging Markets Fund$141.07M2.50N/AN/AN/A

In the previous week, BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Templeton Emerging Markets Fund'saverage media sentiment score.

Summary

Templeton Emerging Markets Fund beats BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund on 3 of the 4 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Templeton Emerging Markets Fund compare to ASA Gold and Precious Metals?

ASA Gold and Precious Metals (NYSE:ASA) and Templeton Emerging Markets Fund (NYSE:EMF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends and earnings.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ASA Gold and Precious MetalsN/A N/A N/A
Templeton Emerging Markets Fund N/A N/A N/A

ASA Gold and Precious Metals has a beta of 0.69, suggesting that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Templeton Emerging Markets Fund has a beta of 0.94, suggesting that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ASA Gold and Precious Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Templeton Emerging Markets Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

ASA Gold and Precious Metals pays an annual dividend of $0.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Templeton Emerging Markets Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ASA Gold and Precious Metals$672.05M1.75N/AN/AN/A
Templeton Emerging Markets Fund$141.07M2.50N/AN/AN/A

In the previous week, ASA Gold and Precious Metals had 2 more articles in the media than Templeton Emerging Markets Fund. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for ASA Gold and Precious Metals and 0 mentions for Templeton Emerging Markets Fund. Templeton Emerging Markets Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat ASA Gold and Precious Metals' score of -0.37 indicating that Templeton Emerging Markets Fund is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
ASA Gold and Precious Metals Neutral
Templeton Emerging Markets Fund Neutral

49.9% of Templeton Emerging Markets Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.7% of ASA Gold and Precious Metals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

ASA Gold and Precious Metals and Templeton Emerging Markets Fund tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Templeton Emerging Markets Fund compare to abrdn Healthcare Investors?

Templeton Emerging Markets Fund (NYSE:EMF) and abrdn Healthcare Investors (NYSE:HQH) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and media sentiment.

Templeton Emerging Markets Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. abrdn Healthcare Investors pays an annual dividend of $2.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.1%.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Templeton Emerging Markets Fund$141.07M2.50N/AN/AN/A
abrdn Healthcare InvestorsN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Templeton Emerging Markets FundN/A N/A N/A
abrdn Healthcare Investors N/A N/A N/A

49.9% of Templeton Emerging Markets Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.6% of abrdn Healthcare Investors shares are held by institutional investors. 7.3% of abrdn Healthcare Investors shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Templeton Emerging Markets Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled abrdn Healthcare Investors'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Templeton Emerging Markets Fund Neutral
abrdn Healthcare Investors Neutral

Templeton Emerging Markets Fund has a beta of 0.94, indicating that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, abrdn Healthcare Investors has a beta of 0.8, indicating that its share price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Templeton Emerging Markets Fund beats abrdn Healthcare Investors on 3 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Templeton Emerging Markets Fund compare to Goldman Sachs BDC?

Goldman Sachs BDC (NYSE:GSBD) and Templeton Emerging Markets Fund (NYSE:EMF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

28.7% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 49.9% of Templeton Emerging Markets Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Goldman Sachs BDC has a net margin of 21.32% compared to Templeton Emerging Markets Fund's net margin of 0.00%. Goldman Sachs BDC's return on equity of 10.94% beat Templeton Emerging Markets Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Goldman Sachs BDC21.32% 10.94% 4.66%
Templeton Emerging Markets Fund N/A N/A N/A

Goldman Sachs BDC has a beta of 0.58, suggesting that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Templeton Emerging Markets Fund has a beta of 0.94, suggesting that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Goldman Sachs BDC had 2 more articles in the media than Templeton Emerging Markets Fund. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Goldman Sachs BDC and 0 mentions for Templeton Emerging Markets Fund. Goldman Sachs BDC's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Templeton Emerging Markets Fund'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Goldman Sachs BDC Neutral
Templeton Emerging Markets Fund Neutral

Goldman Sachs BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.0%. Templeton Emerging Markets Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Goldman Sachs BDC pays out 196.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Goldman Sachs BDC currently has a consensus target price of $9.17, suggesting a potential upside of 0.57%. Given Goldman Sachs BDC's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Goldman Sachs BDC is more favorable than Templeton Emerging Markets Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Goldman Sachs BDC
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67
Templeton Emerging Markets Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Goldman Sachs BDC has higher revenue and earnings than Templeton Emerging Markets Fund.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Goldman Sachs BDC$365.57M2.81$119.27M$0.6514.02
Templeton Emerging Markets Fund$141.07M2.50N/AN/AN/A

Summary

Goldman Sachs BDC beats Templeton Emerging Markets Fund on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Templeton Emerging Markets Fund compare to Tortoise Energy Infrastructure?

Tortoise Energy Infrastructure (NYSE:TYG) and Templeton Emerging Markets Fund (NYSE:EMF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, risk, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

32.5% of Tortoise Energy Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 49.9% of Templeton Emerging Markets Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Tortoise Energy Infrastructure shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tortoise Energy InfrastructureN/A N/A N/A
Templeton Emerging Markets Fund N/A N/A N/A

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure$46.61M19.55N/AN/AN/A
Templeton Emerging Markets Fund$141.07M2.50N/AN/AN/A

Tortoise Energy Infrastructure has a beta of 0.74, indicating that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Templeton Emerging Markets Fund has a beta of 0.94, indicating that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

Tortoise Energy Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of $5.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.0%. Templeton Emerging Markets Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%.

In the previous week, Tortoise Energy Infrastructure had 1 more articles in the media than Templeton Emerging Markets Fund. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Tortoise Energy Infrastructure and 0 mentions for Templeton Emerging Markets Fund. Tortoise Energy Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 1.29 beat Templeton Emerging Markets Fund's score of 0.00 indicating that Tortoise Energy Infrastructure is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Positive
Templeton Emerging Markets Fund Neutral

Summary

Tortoise Energy Infrastructure beats Templeton Emerging Markets Fund on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Templeton Emerging Markets Fund News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for EMF and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding EMF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

EMF vs. The Competition

MetricTempleton Emerging Markets FundFIN IndustryFinance SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$355.46M$4.87B$13.45B$23.08B
Dividend Yield3.63%6.95%5.82%4.10%
P/E RatioN/A0.0219.9231.05
Price / Sales2.5037.23142.3123.96
Price / CashN/A5.0319.2924.43
Price / BookN/A3.232.204.72
Net IncomeN/A$388.27M$1.13B$1.07B
7 Day Performance1.05%-0.28%0.15%-0.28%
1 Month PerformanceN/AN/AN/A2.09%
1 Year Performance70.23%13.93%12.06%26.35%

Templeton Emerging Markets Fund Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
EMF
Templeton Emerging Markets Fund
N/A$23.56
-0.9%
N/A+75.2%$355.46M$141.07MN/AN/A
MUC
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund
N/A$10.77
+0.5%
N/A+3.7%$1.35B$26.56MN/A147,000
ASA
ASA Gold and Precious Metals
1.2313 of 5 stars
$60.93
-2.5%
N/A+80.8%$1.15BN/AN/A1,100
HQH
abrdn Healthcare Investors
N/A$19.50
+0.7%
N/A+22.5%$1.11B$99.81MN/A147,000
GSBD
Goldman Sachs BDC
2.686 of 5 stars
$8.92
+0.5%
$9.17
+2.8%
-21.9%$1.01B$86.61M13.76N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:EMF) was last updated on 6/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners