Free Trial

Ferguson (FERG) Competitors

Ferguson logo
$234.62 +10.33 (+4.61%)
Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$234.98 +0.35 (+0.15%)
As of 07:48 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

FERG vs. CNM, DOV, EXP, FBIN, and IR

Should you buy Ferguson stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Ferguson with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Ferguson include Core & Main (CNM), Dover (DOV), Eagle Materials (EXP), Fortune Brands Innovations (FBIN), and Ingersoll Rand (IR).

How does Ferguson compare to Core & Main?

Core & Main (NYSE:CNM) and Ferguson (NYSE:FERG) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

Core & Main has a beta of 0.91, suggesting that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ferguson has a beta of 1.15, suggesting that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

Ferguson has higher revenue and earnings than Core & Main. Core & Main is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ferguson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Core & Main$7.65B1.34$441M$2.3122.79
Ferguson$31.32B1.45$1.86B$8.6027.28

In the previous week, Ferguson had 10 more articles in the media than Core & Main. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Ferguson and 7 mentions for Core & Main. Ferguson's average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat Core & Main's score of 0.67 indicating that Ferguson is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Core & Main
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Ferguson
8 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Core & Main currently has a consensus target price of $61.64, suggesting a potential upside of 17.10%. Ferguson has a consensus target price of $277.77, suggesting a potential upside of 18.39%. Given Ferguson's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Ferguson is more favorable than Core & Main.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Core & Main
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.58
Ferguson
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.82

94.2% of Core & Main shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.0% of Ferguson shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Core & Main shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Ferguson shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Ferguson has a net margin of 6.98% compared to Core & Main's net margin of 5.77%. Ferguson's return on equity of 38.81% beat Core & Main's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Core & Main5.77% 25.45% 8.06%
Ferguson 6.98%38.81%12.83%

Summary

Ferguson beats Core & Main on 15 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ferguson compare to Dover?

Ferguson (NYSE:FERG) and Dover (NYSE:DOV) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

82.0% of Ferguson shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.5% of Dover shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Ferguson shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Dover shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Ferguson has a beta of 1.15, indicating that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Dover has a beta of 1.17, indicating that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market.

Ferguson has higher revenue and earnings than Dover. Ferguson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dover, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ferguson$31.32B1.45$1.86B$8.6027.28
Dover$8.09B3.67$1.09B$8.0227.52

In the previous week, Ferguson had 14 more articles in the media than Dover. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Ferguson and 3 mentions for Dover. Ferguson's average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat Dover's score of 0.00 indicating that Ferguson is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Ferguson
8 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Dover
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Dover has a net margin of 13.30% compared to Ferguson's net margin of 6.98%. Ferguson's return on equity of 38.81% beat Dover's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ferguson6.98% 38.81% 12.83%
Dover 13.30%18.01%10.10%

Ferguson pays an annual dividend of $3.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Dover pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Ferguson pays out 41.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Dover pays out 25.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Dover has increased its dividend for 70 consecutive years.

Ferguson presently has a consensus price target of $277.77, indicating a potential upside of 18.39%. Dover has a consensus price target of $238.79, indicating a potential upside of 8.20%. Given Ferguson's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Ferguson is more favorable than Dover.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ferguson
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.82
Dover
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.53

Summary

Ferguson beats Dover on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ferguson compare to Eagle Materials?

Eagle Materials (NYSE:EXP) and Ferguson (NYSE:FERG) are related companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

In the previous week, Ferguson had 15 more articles in the media than Eagle Materials. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Ferguson and 2 mentions for Eagle Materials. Ferguson's average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat Eagle Materials' score of 0.46 indicating that Ferguson is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Eagle Materials
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Ferguson
8 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Eagle Materials pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Ferguson pays an annual dividend of $3.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Eagle Materials pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ferguson pays out 41.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

96.1% of Eagle Materials shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.0% of Ferguson shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Eagle Materials shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Ferguson shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Ferguson has higher revenue and earnings than Eagle Materials. Eagle Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ferguson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Eagle Materials$2.31B2.91$423.81M$13.1216.56
Ferguson$31.32B1.45$1.86B$8.6027.28

Eagle Materials has a net margin of 18.36% compared to Ferguson's net margin of 6.98%. Ferguson's return on equity of 38.81% beat Eagle Materials' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Eagle Materials18.36% 28.27% 11.70%
Ferguson 6.98%38.81%12.83%

Eagle Materials has a beta of 1.37, meaning that its share price is 37% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ferguson has a beta of 1.15, meaning that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

Eagle Materials currently has a consensus target price of $224.30, suggesting a potential upside of 3.26%. Ferguson has a consensus target price of $277.77, suggesting a potential upside of 18.39%. Given Ferguson's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Ferguson is more favorable than Eagle Materials.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Eagle Materials
0 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.09
Ferguson
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.82

Summary

Ferguson beats Eagle Materials on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ferguson compare to Fortune Brands Innovations?

Fortune Brands Innovations (NYSE:FBIN) and Ferguson (NYSE:FERG) are related companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, valuation and institutional ownership.

Fortune Brands Innovations presently has a consensus target price of $51.31, suggesting a potential upside of 24.45%. Ferguson has a consensus target price of $277.77, suggesting a potential upside of 18.39%. Given Fortune Brands Innovations' higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Fortune Brands Innovations is more favorable than Ferguson.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fortune Brands Innovations
2 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.13
Ferguson
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.82

Ferguson has a net margin of 6.98% compared to Fortune Brands Innovations' net margin of 6.12%. Ferguson's return on equity of 38.81% beat Fortune Brands Innovations' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fortune Brands Innovations6.12% 17.72% 6.40%
Ferguson 6.98%38.81%12.83%

87.6% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.0% of Ferguson shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Ferguson shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Ferguson has higher revenue and earnings than Fortune Brands Innovations. Fortune Brands Innovations is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ferguson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fortune Brands Innovations$4.46B1.10$298.80M$2.2518.32
Ferguson$31.32B1.45$1.86B$8.6027.28

Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.37, suggesting that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ferguson has a beta of 1.15, suggesting that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Ferguson had 7 more articles in the media than Fortune Brands Innovations. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Ferguson and 10 mentions for Fortune Brands Innovations. Fortune Brands Innovations' average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat Ferguson's score of 0.83 indicating that Fortune Brands Innovations is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Fortune Brands Innovations
8 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Ferguson
8 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Fortune Brands Innovations pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Ferguson pays an annual dividend of $3.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Fortune Brands Innovations pays out 46.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ferguson pays out 41.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Fortune Brands Innovations has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Fortune Brands Innovations is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Ferguson beats Fortune Brands Innovations on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ferguson compare to Ingersoll Rand?

Ferguson (NYSE:FERG) and Ingersoll Rand (NYSE:IR) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and dividends.

In the previous week, Ingersoll Rand had 7 more articles in the media than Ferguson. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Ingersoll Rand and 17 mentions for Ferguson. Ingersoll Rand's average media sentiment score of 1.39 beat Ferguson's score of 0.83 indicating that Ingersoll Rand is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Ferguson
8 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Ingersoll Rand
18 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Ferguson presently has a consensus price target of $277.77, suggesting a potential upside of 18.39%. Ingersoll Rand has a consensus price target of $92.75, suggesting a potential upside of 25.51%. Given Ingersoll Rand's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Ingersoll Rand is more favorable than Ferguson.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ferguson
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.82
Ingersoll Rand
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.44

Ferguson has a beta of 1.15, meaning that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ingersoll Rand has a beta of 1.19, meaning that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

Ferguson has higher revenue and earnings than Ingersoll Rand. Ferguson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ingersoll Rand, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ferguson$31.32B1.45$1.86B$8.6027.28
Ingersoll Rand$7.65B3.78$581.40M$1.4849.93

82.0% of Ferguson shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.3% of Ingersoll Rand shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Ferguson shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Ingersoll Rand shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Ferguson pays an annual dividend of $3.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Ingersoll Rand pays an annual dividend of $0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Ferguson pays out 41.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ingersoll Rand pays out 5.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Ingersoll Rand has a net margin of 7.54% compared to Ferguson's net margin of 6.98%. Ferguson's return on equity of 38.81% beat Ingersoll Rand's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ferguson6.98% 38.81% 12.83%
Ingersoll Rand 7.54%12.79%7.16%

Summary

Ingersoll Rand beats Ferguson on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Ferguson News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FERG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FERG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FERG vs. The Competition

MetricFergusonMACH IndustryIndustrials SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$43.50B$15.32B$9.36B$22.98B
Dividend Yield1.59%1.30%3.55%4.11%
P/E Ratio27.2841.2525.0030.61
Price / Sales1.456.215,032.1721.22
Price / Cash20.1035.7927.9423.83
Price / Book7.584.894.804.64
Net Income$1.86B$445.83M$793.53M$1.07B
7 Day Performance3.16%-0.30%-1.66%-0.71%
1 Month Performance-2.84%-2.58%2,654.24%0.06%
1 Year Performance9.68%31.40%25.81%21.50%

Ferguson Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FERG
Ferguson
4.6877 of 5 stars
$234.62
+4.6%
$277.77
+18.4%
+6.2%$43.50B$31.32B27.2835,000
CNM
Core & Main
3.6607 of 5 stars
$49.42
+0.5%
$61.64
+24.7%
-12.5%$9.63B$7.65B21.395,600
DOV
Dover
2.7144 of 5 stars
$211.35
-0.5%
$237.36
+12.3%
+20.5%$28.46B$8.09B26.3524,000
EXP
Eagle Materials
2.687 of 5 stars
$221.36
+1.1%
$223.30
+0.9%
+3.4%$6.85B$2.31B16.872,800
FBIN
Fortune Brands Innovations
4.9285 of 5 stars
$38.94
-1.1%
$51.31
+31.8%
-22.9%$4.65B$4.46B17.3110,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:FERG) was last updated on 6/9/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners