Go Pro

Ferguson (FERG) Competitors

Ferguson logo
$228.52 -4.74 (-2.03%)
As of 08/28/2026 03:58 PM Eastern

FERG vs. BCC, CNM, CRH, DOV, and EXP

Should you buy Ferguson stock or one of its competitors? Ferguson's main competitors and comparable companies include Boise Cascade (BCC), Core & Main (CNM), CRH (CRH), Dover (DOV), and Eagle Materials (EXP). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size.

How does Ferguson compare to Boise Cascade?

Ferguson (NYSE:FERG) and Boise Cascade (NYSE:BCC) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Ferguson has a beta of 1.14, meaning that its share price is 14% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Boise Cascade has a beta of 1.1, meaning that its share price is 10% more volatile than the broader market.

Ferguson has higher revenue and earnings than Boise Cascade. Boise Cascade is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ferguson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ferguson$31.32B1.41$1.86B$8.5126.85
Boise Cascade$6.40B0.43$132.84M$2.9526.62

Ferguson has a net margin of 6.82% compared to Boise Cascade's net margin of 1.64%. Ferguson's return on equity of 37.24% beat Boise Cascade's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ferguson6.82% 37.24% 12.31%
Boise Cascade 1.64%5.41%3.34%

Ferguson pays an annual dividend of $3.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Boise Cascade pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Ferguson pays out 41.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Boise Cascade pays out 29.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Boise Cascade has increased its dividend for 6 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Ferguson had 18 more articles in the media than Boise Cascade. MarketBeat recorded 30 mentions for Ferguson and 12 mentions for Boise Cascade. Boise Cascade's average media sentiment score of 1.37 beat Ferguson's score of 1.03 indicating that Boise Cascade is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Ferguson
19 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
3 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Boise Cascade
11 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

82.0% of Ferguson shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.2% of Boise Cascade shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Ferguson shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Boise Cascade shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Ferguson currently has a consensus price target of $285.93, suggesting a potential upside of 25.12%. Boise Cascade has a consensus price target of $93.60, suggesting a potential upside of 19.21%. Given Ferguson's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Ferguson is more favorable than Boise Cascade.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ferguson
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.76
Boise Cascade
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.29

Summary

Ferguson beats Boise Cascade on 15 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ferguson compare to Core & Main?

Core & Main (NYSE:CNM) and Ferguson (NYSE:FERG) are both industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and media sentiment.

Ferguson has higher revenue and earnings than Core & Main. Core & Main is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ferguson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Core & Main$7.65B1.09$441M$2.3618.20
Ferguson$31.32B1.41$1.86B$8.5126.85

Ferguson has a net margin of 6.82% compared to Core & Main's net margin of 5.87%. Ferguson's return on equity of 37.24% beat Core & Main's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Core & Main5.87% 26.17% 8.58%
Ferguson 6.82%37.24%12.31%

Core & Main has a beta of 0.92, indicating that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ferguson has a beta of 1.14, indicating that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the broader market.

94.2% of Core & Main shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.0% of Ferguson shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Core & Main shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Ferguson shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Ferguson had 24 more articles in the media than Core & Main. MarketBeat recorded 30 mentions for Ferguson and 6 mentions for Core & Main. Ferguson's average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat Core & Main's score of -0.24 indicating that Ferguson is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Core & Main
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Ferguson
19 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
3 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Core & Main presently has a consensus price target of $56.70, suggesting a potential upside of 32.01%. Ferguson has a consensus price target of $285.93, suggesting a potential upside of 25.12%. Given Core & Main's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Core & Main is more favorable than Ferguson.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Core & Main
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.54
Ferguson
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.76

Summary

Ferguson beats Core & Main on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ferguson compare to CRH?

Ferguson (NYSE:FERG) and CRH (NYSE:CRH) are related large-cap companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, risk, earnings and profitability.

Ferguson pays an annual dividend of $3.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. CRH pays an annual dividend of $1.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Ferguson pays out 41.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CRH pays out 27.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. CRH is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

CRH has a net margin of 9.93% compared to Ferguson's net margin of 6.82%. Ferguson's return on equity of 37.24% beat CRH's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ferguson6.82% 37.24% 12.31%
CRH 9.93%15.76%6.64%

82.0% of Ferguson shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.5% of CRH shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Ferguson shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of CRH shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Ferguson had 24 more articles in the media than CRH. MarketBeat recorded 30 mentions for Ferguson and 6 mentions for CRH. CRH's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Ferguson's score of 1.03 indicating that CRH is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Ferguson
19 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
3 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
CRH
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Ferguson has a beta of 1.14, meaning that its share price is 14% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CRH has a beta of 1.34, meaning that its share price is 34% more volatile than the broader market.

Ferguson presently has a consensus price target of $285.93, indicating a potential upside of 25.12%. CRH has a consensus price target of $140.57, indicating a potential upside of 46.68%. Given CRH's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe CRH is more favorable than Ferguson.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ferguson
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.76
CRH
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
15 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.12

CRH has higher revenue and earnings than Ferguson. CRH is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ferguson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ferguson$31.32B1.41$1.86B$8.5126.85
CRH$37.45B1.70$3.73B$5.6716.90

Summary

CRH beats Ferguson on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ferguson compare to Dover?

Dover (NYSE:DOV) and Ferguson (NYSE:FERG) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Dover has a beta of 1.16, indicating that its share price is 16% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ferguson has a beta of 1.14, indicating that its share price is 14% more volatile than the broader market.

Dover pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Ferguson pays an annual dividend of $3.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Dover pays out 25.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ferguson pays out 41.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Dover has increased its dividend for 70 consecutive years.

Dover currently has a consensus target price of $238.29, indicating a potential upside of 20.02%. Ferguson has a consensus target price of $285.93, indicating a potential upside of 25.12%. Given Ferguson's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Ferguson is more favorable than Dover.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Dover
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Ferguson
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.76

Dover has a net margin of 13.48% compared to Ferguson's net margin of 6.82%. Ferguson's return on equity of 37.24% beat Dover's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Dover13.48% 18.32% 10.26%
Ferguson 6.82%37.24%12.31%

In the previous week, Dover had 5 more articles in the media than Ferguson. MarketBeat recorded 35 mentions for Dover and 30 mentions for Ferguson. Dover's average media sentiment score of 1.52 beat Ferguson's score of 1.03 indicating that Dover is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Dover
27 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Ferguson
19 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
3 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

84.5% of Dover shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.0% of Ferguson shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Dover shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Ferguson shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Ferguson has higher revenue and earnings than Dover. Dover is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ferguson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Dover$8.09B3.30$1.09B$8.3023.92
Ferguson$31.32B1.41$1.86B$8.5126.85

Summary

Ferguson beats Dover on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ferguson compare to Eagle Materials?

Ferguson (NYSE:FERG) and Eagle Materials (NYSE:EXP) are related companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation and profitability.

Ferguson pays an annual dividend of $3.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Eagle Materials pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Ferguson pays out 41.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Eagle Materials pays out 7.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Ferguson presently has a consensus target price of $285.93, suggesting a potential upside of 25.12%. Eagle Materials has a consensus target price of $223.67, suggesting a potential upside of 13.03%. Given Ferguson's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Ferguson is more favorable than Eagle Materials.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ferguson
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.76
Eagle Materials
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.10

82.0% of Ferguson shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.1% of Eagle Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Ferguson shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Eagle Materials shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Ferguson has a beta of 1.14, meaning that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Eagle Materials has a beta of 1.39, meaning that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Ferguson had 14 more articles in the media than Eagle Materials. MarketBeat recorded 30 mentions for Ferguson and 16 mentions for Eagle Materials. Eagle Materials' average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat Ferguson's score of 1.03 indicating that Eagle Materials is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Ferguson
19 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
3 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Eagle Materials
14 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Eagle Materials has a net margin of 17.32% compared to Ferguson's net margin of 6.82%. Ferguson's return on equity of 37.24% beat Eagle Materials' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ferguson6.82% 37.24% 12.31%
Eagle Materials 17.32%26.87%10.73%

Ferguson has higher revenue and earnings than Eagle Materials. Eagle Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ferguson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ferguson$31.32B1.41$1.86B$8.5126.85
Eagle Materials$2.31B2.63$423.81M$12.6515.64

Summary

Ferguson beats Eagle Materials on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Ferguson News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FERG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FERG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FERG vs. The Competition

MetricFergusonTrading Companies & Distributors IndustryIndustrials SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$44.20B$9.19B$10.50B$24.18B
Dividend Yield1.56%3.40%97.24%3.72%
P/E Ratio26.8523.6623.4026.01
Price / Sales1.4123.28372.3120.39
Price / Cash20.4848.8324.2119.75
Price / Book7.383.795.034.84
Net Income$1.86B$371.61M$610.96M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-5.71%-1.31%-0.86%-0.32%
1 Month Performance0.78%1.91%1.92%1.84%
1 Year Performance-1.15%6.69%10.97%13.37%

Ferguson Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FERG
Ferguson
4.7041 of 5 stars
$228.52
-2.0%
$285.93
+25.1%
-1.1%$44.20B$31.32B26.8535,000
BCC
Boise Cascade
4.7342 of 5 stars
$82.56
+1.0%
$93.60
+13.4%
-9.7%$2.88B$6.40B27.997,660
CNM
Core & Main
4.1072 of 5 stars
$44.91
+1.0%
$56.70
+26.3%
-33.6%$8.69B$7.65B19.035,600
CRH
CRH
4.9606 of 5 stars
$95.07
+2.1%
$139.44
+46.7%
-15.1%$63.25B$37.45B16.7783,032
DOV
Dover
4.8657 of 5 stars
$201.96
+1.0%
$238.29
+18.0%
+11.0%$27.19B$8.09B24.3324,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:FERG) was last updated on 8/30/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners