Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) Competitors

62.5% of CRH shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.0% of Martin Marietta Materials shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of CRH shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Martin Marietta Materials shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

CRH pays an annual dividend of $1.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Martin Marietta Materials pays an annual dividend of $3.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. CRH pays out 28.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Martin Marietta Materials pays out 7.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Martin Marietta Materials has raised its dividend for 9 consecutive years.

CRH presently has a consensus price target of $139.54, suggesting a potential upside of 23.98%. Martin Marietta Materials has a consensus price target of $688.81, suggesting a potential upside of 13.67%. Given CRH's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe CRH is more favorable than Martin Marietta Materials.

In the previous week, Martin Marietta Materials had 8 more articles in the media than CRH. MarketBeat recorded 31 mentions for Martin Marietta Materials and 23 mentions for CRH. CRH's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Martin Marietta Materials' score of 0.71 indicating that CRH is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Martin Marietta Materials has a net margin of 38.67% compared to CRH's net margin of 9.65%. CRH's return on equity of 15.37% beat Martin Marietta Materials' return on equity.

CRH has higher revenue and earnings than Martin Marietta Materials. Martin Marietta Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CRH, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CRH has a beta of 1.36, meaning that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Martin Marietta Materials has a beta of 1.13, meaning that its stock price is 13% more volatile than the S&P 500.

98.3% of Dycom Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.0% of Martin Marietta Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.7% of Dycom Industries shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Martin Marietta Materials shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Dycom Industries has a beta of 1.46, indicating that its share price is 46% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Martin Marietta Materials has a beta of 1.13, indicating that its share price is 13% more volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Martin Marietta Materials had 22 more articles in the media than Dycom Industries. MarketBeat recorded 31 mentions for Martin Marietta Materials and 9 mentions for Dycom Industries. Dycom Industries' average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat Martin Marietta Materials' score of 0.71 indicating that Dycom Industries is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Martin Marietta Materials has a net margin of 38.67% compared to Dycom Industries' net margin of 5.07%. Dycom Industries' return on equity of 21.77% beat Martin Marietta Materials' return on equity.

Martin Marietta Materials has higher revenue and earnings than Dycom Industries. Martin Marietta Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dycom Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dycom Industries presently has a consensus price target of $431.64, suggesting a potential downside of 5.54%. Martin Marietta Materials has a consensus price target of $688.81, suggesting a potential upside of 13.67%. Given Martin Marietta Materials' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Martin Marietta Materials is more favorable than Dycom Industries.

96.1% of Eagle Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.0% of Martin Marietta Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Eagle Materials shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Martin Marietta Materials shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Eagle Materials has a beta of 1.38, meaning that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Martin Marietta Materials has a beta of 1.13, meaning that its stock price is 13% more volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Martin Marietta Materials had 24 more articles in the media than Eagle Materials. MarketBeat recorded 31 mentions for Martin Marietta Materials and 7 mentions for Eagle Materials. Eagle Materials' average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Martin Marietta Materials' score of 0.71 indicating that Eagle Materials is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Martin Marietta Materials has a net margin of 38.67% compared to Eagle Materials' net margin of 18.70%. Eagle Materials' return on equity of 28.96% beat Martin Marietta Materials' return on equity.

Martin Marietta Materials has higher revenue and earnings than Eagle Materials. Martin Marietta Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Eagle Materials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Eagle Materials presently has a consensus price target of $228.82, suggesting a potential upside of 9.13%. Martin Marietta Materials has a consensus price target of $688.81, suggesting a potential upside of 13.67%. Given Martin Marietta Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Martin Marietta Materials is more favorable than Eagle Materials.

Eagle Materials pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Martin Marietta Materials pays an annual dividend of $3.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Eagle Materials pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Martin Marietta Materials pays out 7.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Martin Marietta Materials has raised its dividend for 9 consecutive years. Martin Marietta Materials is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Martin Marietta Materials has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Ingersoll Rand. Martin Marietta Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ingersoll Rand, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Martin Marietta Materials has a net margin of 38.67% compared to Ingersoll Rand's net margin of 7.54%. Ingersoll Rand's return on equity of 12.79% beat Martin Marietta Materials' return on equity.

95.0% of Martin Marietta Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.3% of Ingersoll Rand shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Martin Marietta Materials shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Ingersoll Rand shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Martin Marietta Materials pays an annual dividend of $3.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Ingersoll Rand pays an annual dividend of $0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Martin Marietta Materials pays out 7.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ingersoll Rand pays out 5.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Martin Marietta Materials has increased its dividend for 9 consecutive years. Martin Marietta Materials is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Martin Marietta Materials presently has a consensus price target of $688.81, suggesting a potential upside of 13.67%. Ingersoll Rand has a consensus price target of $94.71, suggesting a potential upside of 24.90%. Given Ingersoll Rand's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Ingersoll Rand is more favorable than Martin Marietta Materials.

Martin Marietta Materials has a beta of 1.13, indicating that its share price is 13% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ingersoll Rand has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its share price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Martin Marietta Materials had 9 more articles in the media than Ingersoll Rand. MarketBeat recorded 31 mentions for Martin Marietta Materials and 22 mentions for Ingersoll Rand. Martin Marietta Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Ingersoll Rand's score of 0.49 indicating that Martin Marietta Materials is being referred to more favorably in the media.