Martin Marietta Materials Competitors

Martin Marietta Materials (NYSE:MLM) and Vulcan Materials (NYSE:VMC) are both large-cap construction companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares Martin Marietta Materials and Vulcan Materials' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Martin Marietta Materials and Vulcan Materials' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Vulcan Materials has higher revenue and earnings than Martin Marietta Materials. Martin Marietta Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vulcan Materials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

97.8% of Martin Marietta Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.8% of Vulcan Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Martin Marietta Materials shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Vulcan Materials shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility and Risk

Martin Marietta Materials has a beta of 0.69, suggesting that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Vulcan Materials has a beta of 0.6, suggesting that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Martin Marietta Materials and Vulcan Materials, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Martin Marietta Materials presently has a consensus target price of $278.2105, indicating a potential downside of 20.26%. Vulcan Materials has a consensus target price of $145.8947, indicating a potential downside of 16.39%. Given Vulcan Materials' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Vulcan Materials is more favorable than Martin Marietta Materials.

Dividends

Martin Marietta Materials pays an annual dividend of $2.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Vulcan Materials pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Martin Marietta Materials pays out 23.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Vulcan Materials pays out 31.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Martin Marietta Materials has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Vulcan Materials has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Summary

Martin Marietta Materials beats Vulcan Materials on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Martin Marietta Materials (NYSE:MLM) and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile (NYSE:SQM) are both large-cap construction companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Martin Marietta Materials and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Martin Marietta Materials has higher revenue and earnings than Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile. Martin Marietta Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Martin Marietta Materials has a beta of 0.69, meaning that its share price is 31% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile has a beta of 0.96, meaning that its share price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Martin Marietta Materials and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Martin Marietta Materials currently has a consensus price target of $278.2105, suggesting a potential downside of 20.26%. Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile has a consensus price target of $53.50, suggesting a potential upside of 2.04%. Given Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile is more favorable than Martin Marietta Materials.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

97.8% of Martin Marietta Materials shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.8% of Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Martin Marietta Materials shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Martin Marietta Materials and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

Martin Marietta Materials pays an annual dividend of $2.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile pays an annual dividend of $0.29 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Martin Marietta Materials pays out 23.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile pays out 27.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Martin Marietta Materials has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Martin Marietta Materials is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Martin Marietta Materials beats Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Teck Resources (NYSE:TECK) and Martin Marietta Materials (NYSE:MLM) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, risk, earnings, dividends, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Volatility & Risk

Teck Resources has a beta of 1.27, meaning that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Martin Marietta Materials has a beta of 0.69, meaning that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Teck Resources and Martin Marietta Materials' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

Teck Resources pays an annual dividend of $0.15 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Martin Marietta Materials pays an annual dividend of $2.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Teck Resources pays out 6.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Martin Marietta Materials pays out 23.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Teck Resources has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Martin Marietta Materials has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Teck Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Teck Resources and Martin Marietta Materials, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Teck Resources presently has a consensus price target of $25.60, indicating a potential upside of 31.69%. Martin Marietta Materials has a consensus price target of $278.2105, indicating a potential downside of 20.26%. Given Teck Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Teck Resources is more favorable than Martin Marietta Materials.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Teck Resources and Martin Marietta Materials' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Martin Marietta Materials has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Teck Resources. Teck Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Martin Marietta Materials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

47.1% of Teck Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.8% of Martin Marietta Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Martin Marietta Materials shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Martin Marietta Materials beats Teck Resources on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Martin Marietta Materials (NYSE:MLM) and MDU Resources Group (NYSE:MDU) are both construction companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

97.8% of Martin Marietta Materials shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.4% of MDU Resources Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Martin Marietta Materials shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of MDU Resources Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

Martin Marietta Materials has a beta of 0.69, meaning that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, MDU Resources Group has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Martin Marietta Materials and MDU Resources Group, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Martin Marietta Materials presently has a consensus price target of $278.2105, indicating a potential downside of 20.26%. MDU Resources Group has a consensus price target of $28.3333, indicating a potential downside of 11.68%. Given MDU Resources Group's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe MDU Resources Group is more favorable than Martin Marietta Materials.

Dividends

Martin Marietta Materials pays an annual dividend of $2.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. MDU Resources Group pays an annual dividend of $0.85 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Martin Marietta Materials pays out 23.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. MDU Resources Group pays out 50.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Martin Marietta Materials has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years and MDU Resources Group has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Profitability

This table compares Martin Marietta Materials and MDU Resources Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Martin Marietta Materials and MDU Resources Group's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Martin Marietta Materials has higher earnings, but lower revenue than MDU Resources Group. MDU Resources Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Martin Marietta Materials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Martin Marietta Materials beats MDU Resources Group on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Summit Materials (NYSE:SUM) and Martin Marietta Materials (NYSE:MLM) are both construction companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, risk, dividends, institutional ownership and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares Summit Materials and Martin Marietta Materials' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

97.8% of Martin Marietta Materials shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Summit Materials shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Martin Marietta Materials shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Summit Materials and Martin Marietta Materials' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Martin Marietta Materials has higher revenue and earnings than Summit Materials. Summit Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Martin Marietta Materials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

Summit Materials has a beta of 1.37, indicating that its share price is 37% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Martin Marietta Materials has a beta of 0.69, indicating that its share price is 31% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Summit Materials and Martin Marietta Materials, as reported by MarketBeat.

Summit Materials presently has a consensus price target of $22.20, suggesting a potential downside of 24.90%. Martin Marietta Materials has a consensus price target of $278.2105, suggesting a potential downside of 20.26%. Given Martin Marietta Materials' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Martin Marietta Materials is more favorable than Summit Materials.

Summary

Martin Marietta Materials beats Summit Materials on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Martin Marietta Materials (NYSE:MLM) and Hecla Mining (NYSE:HL) are both construction companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends and earnings.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

97.8% of Martin Marietta Materials shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.0% of Hecla Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Martin Marietta Materials shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Hecla Mining shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Martin Marietta Materials and Hecla Mining's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Martin Marietta Materials and Hecla Mining, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Martin Marietta Materials presently has a consensus target price of $278.2105, suggesting a potential downside of 20.26%. Hecla Mining has a consensus target price of $6.2417, suggesting a potential upside of 5.43%. Given Hecla Mining's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Hecla Mining is more favorable than Martin Marietta Materials.

Dividends

Martin Marietta Materials pays an annual dividend of $2.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Hecla Mining pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Martin Marietta Materials pays out 23.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hecla Mining pays out -30.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Martin Marietta Materials has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Hecla Mining has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Hecla Mining is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Risk and Volatility

Martin Marietta Materials has a beta of 0.69, suggesting that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Hecla Mining has a beta of 2.14, suggesting that its stock price is 114% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Martin Marietta Materials and Hecla Mining's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Martin Marietta Materials has higher revenue and earnings than Hecla Mining. Hecla Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Martin Marietta Materials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Martin Marietta Materials beats Hecla Mining on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.