Composecure (GPGI) Competitors

RBC Bearings has higher revenue and earnings than Composecure. Composecure is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than RBC Bearings, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

RBC Bearings has a beta of 1.34, meaning that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Composecure has a beta of 0.89, meaning that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

37.6% of Composecure shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of RBC Bearings shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 18.4% of Composecure shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Composecure's return on equity of 7.70% beat RBC Bearings' return on equity.

Composecure has a consensus price target of $15.00, suggesting a potential upside of 19.46%. Given Composecure's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Composecure is more favorable than RBC Bearings.

In the previous week, Composecure had 3 more articles in the media than RBC Bearings. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Composecure and 0 mentions for RBC Bearings. Composecure's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat RBC Bearings' score of 0.00 indicating that Composecure is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Mueller Industries has a beta of 1.08, indicating that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Composecure has a beta of 0.89, indicating that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

Mueller Industries has a net margin of 18.25% compared to Composecure's net margin of 0.00%. Mueller Industries' return on equity of 25.68% beat Composecure's return on equity.

In the previous week, Mueller Industries had 2 more articles in the media than Composecure. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Mueller Industries and 3 mentions for Composecure. Mueller Industries' average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Composecure's score of 0.67 indicating that Mueller Industries is being referred to more favorably in the media.

94.5% of Mueller Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.6% of Composecure shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.3% of Mueller Industries shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 18.4% of Composecure shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Mueller Industries pays an annual dividend of $0.70 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Composecure pays an annual dividend of $0.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Mueller Industries pays out 18.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Composecure pays out -0.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Mueller Industries has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Mueller Industries is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Mueller Industries presently has a consensus price target of $75.00, indicating a potential upside of 23.54%. Composecure has a consensus price target of $15.00, indicating a potential upside of 19.46%. Given Mueller Industries' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Mueller Industries is more favorable than Composecure.

Mueller Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Composecure. Composecure is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mueller Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Composecure has a beta of 0.89, suggesting that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Graco has a beta of 0.89, suggesting that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Graco had 16 more articles in the media than Composecure. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Graco and 3 mentions for Composecure. Composecure's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Graco's score of 0.60 indicating that Composecure is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Composecure pays an annual dividend of $0.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Graco pays an annual dividend of $1.18 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Composecure pays out -0.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Graco pays out 37.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Graco has raised its dividend for 29 consecutive years. Graco is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Graco has higher revenue and earnings than Composecure. Composecure is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Graco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Composecure presently has a consensus target price of $15.00, indicating a potential upside of 19.46%. Graco has a consensus target price of $95.00, indicating a potential upside of 21.45%. Given Graco's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Graco is more favorable than Composecure.

Graco has a net margin of 23.53% compared to Composecure's net margin of 0.00%. Graco's return on equity of 19.54% beat Composecure's return on equity.

37.6% of Composecure shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.9% of Graco shares are held by institutional investors. 18.4% of Composecure shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Graco shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

75.1% of Crane shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.6% of Composecure shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of Crane shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 18.4% of Composecure shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Crane pays an annual dividend of $1.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Composecure pays an annual dividend of $0.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Crane pays out 17.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Composecure pays out -0.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Crane has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Crane is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Crane has a net margin of 12.97% compared to Composecure's net margin of 0.00%. Crane's return on equity of 18.67% beat Composecure's return on equity.

Crane has higher revenue and earnings than Composecure. Composecure is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Crane, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Crane had 17 more articles in the media than Composecure. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Crane and 3 mentions for Composecure. Crane's average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat Composecure's score of 0.67 indicating that Crane is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Crane has a beta of 1.02, indicating that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Composecure has a beta of 0.89, indicating that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

Crane currently has a consensus target price of $239.00, indicating a potential upside of 16.81%. Composecure has a consensus target price of $15.00, indicating a potential upside of 19.46%. Given Composecure's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Composecure is more favorable than Crane.