Composecure (GPGI) Competitors

Composecure pays an annual dividend of $0.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Lincoln Electric pays an annual dividend of $3.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Composecure pays out -0.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lincoln Electric pays out 31.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Lincoln Electric has increased its dividend for 30 consecutive years. Lincoln Electric is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Lincoln Electric had 11 more articles in the media than Composecure. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Lincoln Electric and 0 mentions for Composecure. Lincoln Electric's average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Composecure's score of 0.00 indicating that Lincoln Electric is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

37.6% of Composecure shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.6% of Lincoln Electric shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.4% of Composecure shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Lincoln Electric shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Lincoln Electric has higher revenue and earnings than Composecure. Composecure is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lincoln Electric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Composecure has a beta of 0.86, meaning that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lincoln Electric has a beta of 1.21, meaning that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the broader market.

Composecure presently has a consensus target price of $15.00, suggesting a potential upside of 19.32%. Lincoln Electric has a consensus target price of $307.22, suggesting a potential upside of 16.65%. Given Composecure's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Composecure is more favorable than Lincoln Electric.

Lincoln Electric has a net margin of 12.35% compared to Composecure's net margin of 0.00%. Lincoln Electric's return on equity of 39.23% beat Composecure's return on equity.

Mueller Industries has a beta of 1.1, indicating that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Composecure has a beta of 0.86, indicating that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

Mueller Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Composecure. Composecure is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mueller Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Mueller Industries had 3 more articles in the media than Composecure. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Mueller Industries and 0 mentions for Composecure. Mueller Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.73 beat Composecure's score of 0.00 indicating that Mueller Industries is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Mueller Industries currently has a consensus target price of $75.00, suggesting a potential upside of 24.55%. Composecure has a consensus target price of $15.00, suggesting a potential upside of 19.32%. Given Mueller Industries' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Mueller Industries is more favorable than Composecure.

Mueller Industries pays an annual dividend of $0.70 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Composecure pays an annual dividend of $0.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Mueller Industries pays out 18.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Composecure pays out -0.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Mueller Industries has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Mueller Industries is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

94.5% of Mueller Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.6% of Composecure shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.3% of Mueller Industries shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 18.4% of Composecure shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Mueller Industries has a net margin of 18.25% compared to Composecure's net margin of 0.00%. Mueller Industries' return on equity of 25.68% beat Composecure's return on equity.

Graco pays an annual dividend of $1.18 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Composecure pays an annual dividend of $0.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Graco pays out 37.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Composecure pays out -0.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Graco has increased its dividend for 29 consecutive years. Graco is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Graco has a beta of 0.92, indicating that its share price is 8% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Composecure has a beta of 0.86, indicating that its share price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

Graco currently has a consensus target price of $95.00, indicating a potential upside of 22.36%. Composecure has a consensus target price of $15.00, indicating a potential upside of 19.32%. Given Graco's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Graco is more favorable than Composecure.

In the previous week, Graco had 7 more articles in the media than Composecure. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Graco and 0 mentions for Composecure. Graco's average media sentiment score of 0.78 beat Composecure's score of 0.00 indicating that Graco is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Graco has higher revenue and earnings than Composecure. Composecure is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Graco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

93.9% of Graco shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.6% of Composecure shares are held by institutional investors. 2.2% of Graco shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 18.4% of Composecure shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Graco has a net margin of 23.53% compared to Composecure's net margin of 0.00%. Graco's return on equity of 19.54% beat Composecure's return on equity.

Composecure has a beta of 0.86, meaning that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Crane has a beta of 1.01, meaning that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

Composecure currently has a consensus target price of $15.00, suggesting a potential upside of 19.32%. Crane has a consensus target price of $239.00, suggesting a potential upside of 18.32%. Given Composecure's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Composecure is more favorable than Crane.

Composecure pays an annual dividend of $0.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Crane pays an annual dividend of $1.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Composecure pays out -0.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Crane pays out 17.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Crane has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Crane is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

37.6% of Composecure shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.1% of Crane shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.4% of Composecure shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Crane shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Crane has higher revenue and earnings than Composecure. Composecure is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Crane, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Crane has a net margin of 12.97% compared to Composecure's net margin of 0.00%. Crane's return on equity of 18.67% beat Composecure's return on equity.

In the previous week, Crane had 22 more articles in the media than Composecure. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Crane and 0 mentions for Composecure. Composecure's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Crane's score of -0.01 indicating that Composecure is being referred to more favorably in the media.