Composecure (GPGI) Competitors

$12.36 +0.41 (+3.39%)

As of 01:41 PM Eastern

GPGI vs. BSAC, BMNR, ALLY, WULF, and HUT

Should you buy Composecure stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Composecure with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Composecure include Banco Santander Chile (BSAC), BitMine Immersion Technologies (BMNR), Ally Financial (ALLY), TeraWulf (WULF), and Hut 8 (HUT). These companies are all part of the "banking" industry.

How does Composecure compare to Banco Santander Chile?

Banco Santander Chile (NYSE:BSAC) and Composecure (NYSE:GPGI) are both banking companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment and profitability.

In the previous week, Composecure had 1 more articles in the media than Banco Santander Chile. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Composecure and 4 mentions for Banco Santander Chile. Composecure's average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat Banco Santander Chile's score of 0.23 indicating that Composecure is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Banco Santander Chile	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Composecure	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Banco Santander Chile pays an annual dividend of $1.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Composecure pays an annual dividend of $0.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Banco Santander Chile pays out 48.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Composecure pays out -0.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Banco Santander Chile has a net margin of 24.95% compared to Composecure's net margin of -56.76%. Banco Santander Chile's return on equity of 21.00% beat Composecure's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Banco Santander Chile	24.95%	21.00%	1.54%
Composecure	-56.76%	12.59%	9.02%

Banco Santander Chile has higher revenue and earnings than Composecure. Composecure is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Banco Santander Chile, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Banco Santander Chile	$4.50B	3.26	$1.12B	$2.32	13.44
Composecure	$59.82M	59.92	-$136.01M	-$2.40	N/A

Banco Santander Chile currently has a consensus target price of $35.50, suggesting a potential upside of 13.87%. Composecure has a consensus target price of $15.00, suggesting a potential upside of 21.31%. Given Composecure's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Composecure is more favorable than Banco Santander Chile.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Banco Santander Chile	1 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.38
Composecure	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Banco Santander Chile has a beta of 0.53, indicating that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Composecure has a beta of 0.98, indicating that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the broader market.

6.4% of Banco Santander Chile shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.6% of Composecure shares are held by institutional investors. 18.4% of Composecure shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Banco Santander Chile beats Composecure on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Composecure compare to BitMine Immersion Technologies?

Composecure (NYSE:GPGI) and BitMine Immersion Technologies (NYSE:BMNR) are both banking companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, earnings, profitability, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, BitMine Immersion Technologies had 2 more articles in the media than Composecure. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for BitMine Immersion Technologies and 5 mentions for Composecure. Composecure's average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat BitMine Immersion Technologies' score of -0.28 indicating that Composecure is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Composecure	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
BitMine Immersion Technologies	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Composecure presently has a consensus target price of $15.00, indicating a potential upside of 21.31%. BitMine Immersion Technologies has a consensus target price of $34.50, indicating a potential upside of 77.51%. Given BitMine Immersion Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe BitMine Immersion Technologies is more favorable than Composecure.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Composecure	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
BitMine Immersion Technologies	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80

Composecure has a net margin of -56.76% compared to BitMine Immersion Technologies' net margin of -51,892.77%. Composecure's return on equity of 12.59% beat BitMine Immersion Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Composecure	-56.76%	12.59%	9.02%
BitMine Immersion Technologies	-51,892.77%	5.59%	5.52%

37.6% of Composecure shares are held by institutional investors. 18.4% of Composecure shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of BitMine Immersion Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

BitMine Immersion Technologies has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Composecure. BitMine Immersion Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Composecure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Composecure	$59.82M	59.92	-$136.01M	-$2.40	N/A
BitMine Immersion Technologies	$6.09M	1,817.70	$348.58M	-$0.13	N/A

Composecure pays an annual dividend of $0.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. BitMine Immersion Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Composecure pays out -0.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. BitMine Immersion Technologies pays out -7.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Composecure beats BitMine Immersion Technologies on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Composecure compare to Ally Financial?

Composecure (NYSE:GPGI) and Ally Financial (NYSE:ALLY) are both banking companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, risk and media sentiment.

Composecure pays an annual dividend of $0.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Ally Financial pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Composecure pays out -0.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ally Financial pays out 29.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Composecure has a beta of 0.98, meaning that its share price is 2% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ally Financial has a beta of 1.12, meaning that its share price is 12% more volatile than the broader market.

Ally Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Composecure. Composecure is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ally Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Composecure	$59.82M	59.92	-$136.01M	-$2.40	N/A
Ally Financial	$7.91B	1.65	$852M	$4.10	10.39

In the previous week, Ally Financial had 10 more articles in the media than Composecure. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Ally Financial and 5 mentions for Composecure. Composecure's average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat Ally Financial's score of 0.63 indicating that Composecure is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Composecure	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Ally Financial	7 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Composecure presently has a consensus target price of $15.00, suggesting a potential upside of 21.31%. Ally Financial has a consensus target price of $54.14, suggesting a potential upside of 27.13%. Given Ally Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Ally Financial is more favorable than Composecure.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Composecure	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Ally Financial	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	14 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88

Ally Financial has a net margin of 16.47% compared to Composecure's net margin of -56.76%. Composecure's return on equity of 12.59% beat Ally Financial's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Composecure	-56.76%	12.59%	9.02%
Ally Financial	16.47%	11.41%	0.76%

37.6% of Composecure shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.8% of Ally Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.4% of Composecure shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Ally Financial shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Ally Financial beats Composecure on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Composecure compare to TeraWulf?

TeraWulf (NASDAQ:WULF) and Composecure (NYSE:GPGI) are both banking companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk and earnings.

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 3 more articles in the media than Composecure. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for TeraWulf and 5 mentions for Composecure. Composecure's average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat TeraWulf's score of 0.93 indicating that Composecure is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
TeraWulf	5 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Composecure	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Composecure has a net margin of -56.76% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -611.46%. Composecure's return on equity of 12.59% beat TeraWulf's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
TeraWulf	-611.46%	-305.07%	-8.42%
Composecure	-56.76%	12.59%	9.02%

TeraWulf currently has a consensus target price of $27.59, indicating a potential upside of 19.54%. Composecure has a consensus target price of $15.00, indicating a potential upside of 21.31%. Given Composecure's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Composecure is more favorable than TeraWulf.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
TeraWulf	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80
Composecure	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Composecure has lower revenue, but higher earnings than TeraWulf. TeraWulf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Composecure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
TeraWulf	$168.06M	68.05	-$661.42M	-$2.48	N/A
Composecure	$59.82M	59.92	-$136.01M	-$2.40	N/A

62.5% of TeraWulf shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.6% of Composecure shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.9% of TeraWulf shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 18.4% of Composecure shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

TeraWulf has a beta of 3.84, meaning that its share price is 284% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Composecure has a beta of 0.98, meaning that its share price is 2% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Composecure beats TeraWulf on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Composecure compare to Hut 8?

Hut 8 (NASDAQ:HUT) and Composecure (NYSE:GPGI) are both banking companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Composecure has a net margin of -56.76% compared to Hut 8's net margin of -109.77%. Composecure's return on equity of 12.59% beat Hut 8's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hut 8	-109.77%	-0.35%	-0.22%
Composecure	-56.76%	12.59%	9.02%

Hut 8 has a beta of 4.48, indicating that its stock price is 348% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Composecure has a beta of 0.98, indicating that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the broader market.

Hut 8 currently has a consensus target price of $107.72, indicating a potential upside of 1.24%. Composecure has a consensus target price of $15.00, indicating a potential upside of 21.31%. Given Composecure's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Composecure is more favorable than Hut 8.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hut 8	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	17 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.89
Composecure	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

31.8% of Hut 8 shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.6% of Composecure shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.4% of Hut 8 shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 18.4% of Composecure shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Composecure has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Hut 8. Hut 8 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Composecure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hut 8	$284.32M	42.14	-$226.15M	-$3.00	N/A
Composecure	$59.82M	59.92	-$136.01M	-$2.40	N/A

In the previous week, Hut 8 had 5 more articles in the media than Composecure. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Hut 8 and 5 mentions for Composecure. Composecure's average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat Hut 8's score of 0.84 indicating that Composecure is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Hut 8	6 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Composecure	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Composecure beats Hut 8 on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Composecure News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GPGI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

GPGI vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Composecure	Financial Services Industry	Financial Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$3.58B	$6.67B	$5.84B	$23.18B
Dividend Yield	0.08%	0.08%	5.25%	4.11%
P/E Ratio	-5.15	N/A	15.90	30.64
Price / Sales	59.92	162.69	1,012.76	14.43
Price / Cash	33.78	53.25	93.55	24.79
Price / Book	1.15	1.85	6.60	4.73
Net Income	-$136.01M	-$220.76M	$1.14B	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	2.35%	0.25%	0.69%	1.84%
1 Month Performance	-23.44%	0.23%	1.43%	0.28%
1 Year Performance	N/A	-7.79%	19.66%	28.07%

Composecure Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
GPGI Composecure	3.3453 of 5 stars	$12.37 +3.4%	$15.00 +21.3%	N/A	$3.58B	$59.82M	N/A	1,007
BSAC Banco Santander Chile	4.5398 of 5 stars	$30.22 +1.5%	$35.50 +17.5%	+25.1%	$14.03B	$4.50B	13.03	8,526	Gap Down
BMNR BitMine Immersion Technologies	4.1508 of 5 stars	$21.68 -5.8%	$34.50 +59.2%	N/A	$13.11B	$6.09M	N/A	N/A
ALLY Ally Financial	4.9844 of 5 stars	$42.84 +0.2%	$54.14 +26.4%	+26.1%	$13.10B	$7.91B	10.45	10,300	Insider Trade
WULF TeraWulf	3.8362 of 5 stars	$22.80 -2.4%	$27.52 +20.7%	+486.2%	$11.58B	$168.46M	N/A	6	Analyst Forecast

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:GPGI) was last updated on 5/22/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Composecure (GPGI) Competitors

GPGI vs. BSAC, BMNR, ALLY, WULF, and HUT

How does Composecure compare to Banco Santander Chile?

Summary

How does Composecure compare to BitMine Immersion Technologies?

Summary

How does Composecure compare to Ally Financial?

Summary

How does Composecure compare to TeraWulf?

Summary

How does Composecure compare to Hut 8?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

GPGI vs. The Competition

Composecure Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Composecure (GPGI) Competitors

GPGI vs. BSAC, BMNR, ALLY, WULF, and HUT

How does Composecure compare to Banco Santander Chile?

Does the media favor BSAC or GPGI?

Is BSAC or GPGI a better dividend stock?

Is BSAC or GPGI more profitable?

Which has better earnings and valuation, BSAC or GPGI?

Do analysts recommend BSAC or GPGI?

Which has more risk and volatility, BSAC or GPGI?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of BSAC or GPGI?

Summary

How does Composecure compare to BitMine Immersion Technologies?

Does the media refer more to GPGI or BMNR?

Do analysts recommend GPGI or BMNR?

Is GPGI or BMNR more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in GPGI or BMNR?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, GPGI or BMNR?

Is GPGI or BMNR a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Composecure compare to Ally Financial?

Is GPGI or ALLY a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk and volatility, GPGI or ALLY?

Which has better valuation & earnings, GPGI or ALLY?

Does the media prefer GPGI or ALLY?

Do analysts recommend GPGI or ALLY?

Is GPGI or ALLY more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in GPGI or ALLY?

Summary

How does Composecure compare to TeraWulf?

Does the media prefer WULF or GPGI?

Is WULF or GPGI more profitable?

Do analysts rate WULF or GPGI?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, WULF or GPGI?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in WULF or GPGI?

Which has more risk and volatility, WULF or GPGI?

Summary

How does Composecure compare to Hut 8?

Is HUT or GPGI more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, HUT or GPGI?

Do analysts prefer HUT or GPGI?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in HUT or GPGI?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, HUT or GPGI?

Does the media prefer HUT or GPGI?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

GPGI vs. The Competition

Composecure Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools