Which has stronger earnings and valuation, GPGI or WULF?

Composecure has higher earnings, but lower revenue than TeraWulf. TeraWulf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Composecure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Composecure $59.82M 58.70 -$136.01M -$2.40 N/A TeraWulf $168.46M 74.57 -$661.42M -$2.48 N/A

Is GPGI or WULF more profitable?

Composecure has a net margin of -56.76% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -611.46%. Composecure's return on equity of 12.59% beat TeraWulf's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Composecure -56.76% 12.59% 9.02% TeraWulf -611.46% -305.07% -8.42%

Composecure (GPGI) Competitors

$12.11 +0.59 (+5.16%)

Closing price 06/11/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$12.02 -0.10 (-0.81%)

As of 06/11/2026 07:28 PM Eastern

Compare

GPGI vs. ALLY, WULF, BMNR, RIOT, and CIFR

Should you buy Composecure stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Composecure with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Composecure include Ally Financial (ALLY), TeraWulf (WULF), BitMine Immersion Technologies (BMNR), Riot Platforms (RIOT), and Cipher Mining (CIFR). These companies are all part of the "banking" industry.

How does Composecure compare to Ally Financial?

Ally Financial (NYSE:ALLY) and Composecure (NYSE:GPGI) are both banking companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk and dividends.

Ally Financial has a net margin of 16.47% compared to Composecure's net margin of -56.76%. Composecure's return on equity of 12.59% beat Ally Financial's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ally Financial	16.47%	11.41%	0.76%
Composecure	-56.76%	12.59%	9.02%

In the previous week, Ally Financial had 9 more articles in the media than Composecure. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Ally Financial and 0 mentions for Composecure. Ally Financial's average media sentiment score of 1.22 beat Composecure's score of 0.00 indicating that Ally Financial is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Ally Financial	Positive
Composecure	Neutral

88.8% of Ally Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.6% of Composecure shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Ally Financial shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 18.4% of Composecure shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Ally Financial presently has a consensus target price of $54.14, suggesting a potential upside of 24.42%. Composecure has a consensus target price of $15.00, suggesting a potential upside of 23.82%. Given Ally Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Ally Financial is more favorable than Composecure.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ally Financial	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	14 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88
Composecure	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Ally Financial has a beta of 1.1, suggesting that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Composecure has a beta of 0.89, suggesting that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

Ally Financial pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Composecure pays an annual dividend of $0.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Ally Financial pays out 29.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Composecure pays out -0.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Ally Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Composecure. Composecure is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ally Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ally Financial	$7.91B	1.69	$852M	$4.10	10.61
Composecure	$59.82M	58.70	-$136.01M	-$2.40	N/A

Summary

Ally Financial beats Composecure on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Composecure compare to TeraWulf?

Composecure (NYSE:GPGI) and TeraWulf (NASDAQ:WULF) are both banking companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, media sentiment, earnings and institutional ownership.

Composecure has a beta of 0.89, indicating that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TeraWulf has a beta of 3.82, indicating that its stock price is 282% more volatile than the broader market.

Composecure currently has a consensus price target of $15.00, indicating a potential upside of 23.82%. TeraWulf has a consensus price target of $31.72, indicating a potential upside of 25.12%. Given TeraWulf's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe TeraWulf is more favorable than Composecure.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Composecure	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
TeraWulf	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.94

Composecure has higher earnings, but lower revenue than TeraWulf. TeraWulf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Composecure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Composecure	$59.82M	58.70	-$136.01M	-$2.40	N/A
TeraWulf	$168.46M	74.57	-$661.42M	-$2.48	N/A

37.6% of Composecure shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.5% of TeraWulf shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.4% of Composecure shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.9% of TeraWulf shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Composecure has a net margin of -56.76% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -611.46%. Composecure's return on equity of 12.59% beat TeraWulf's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Composecure	-56.76%	12.59%	9.02%
TeraWulf	-611.46%	-305.07%	-8.42%

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 15 more articles in the media than Composecure. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for TeraWulf and 0 mentions for Composecure. TeraWulf's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Composecure's score of 0.00 indicating that TeraWulf is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Composecure	Neutral
TeraWulf	Positive

Summary

TeraWulf beats Composecure on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Composecure compare to BitMine Immersion Technologies?

BitMine Immersion Technologies (NYSE:BMNR) and Composecure (NYSE:GPGI) are both mid-cap banking companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, risk, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

BitMine Immersion Technologies presently has a consensus price target of $34.50, indicating a potential upside of 109.05%. Composecure has a consensus price target of $15.00, indicating a potential upside of 23.82%. Given BitMine Immersion Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe BitMine Immersion Technologies is more favorable than Composecure.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
BitMine Immersion Technologies	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80
Composecure	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Composecure has a net margin of -56.76% compared to BitMine Immersion Technologies' net margin of -51,892.77%. Composecure's return on equity of 12.59% beat BitMine Immersion Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
BitMine Immersion Technologies	-51,892.77%	5.59%	5.52%
Composecure	-56.76%	12.59%	9.02%

BitMine Immersion Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Composecure. BitMine Immersion Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Composecure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
BitMine Immersion Technologies	$6.09M	1,543.48	$348.58M	-$0.13	N/A
Composecure	$59.82M	58.70	-$136.01M	-$2.40	N/A

BitMine Immersion Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Composecure pays an annual dividend of $0.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. BitMine Immersion Technologies pays out -7.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Composecure pays out -0.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

37.6% of Composecure shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of BitMine Immersion Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 18.4% of Composecure shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, BitMine Immersion Technologies had 13 more articles in the media than Composecure. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for BitMine Immersion Technologies and 0 mentions for Composecure. BitMine Immersion Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.08 beat Composecure's score of 0.00 indicating that BitMine Immersion Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
BitMine Immersion Technologies	Neutral
Composecure	Neutral

Summary

BitMine Immersion Technologies beats Composecure on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Composecure compare to Riot Platforms?

Riot Platforms (NASDAQ:RIOT) and Composecure (NYSE:GPGI) are both mid-cap banking companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings and dividends.

Riot Platforms has a beta of 3.84, indicating that its stock price is 284% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Composecure has a beta of 0.89, indicating that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Riot Platforms had 8 more articles in the media than Composecure. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Riot Platforms and 0 mentions for Composecure. Composecure's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Riot Platforms' score of -0.18 indicating that Composecure is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Riot Platforms	Neutral
Composecure	Neutral

Riot Platforms presently has a consensus target price of $24.70, indicating a potential downside of 5.51%. Composecure has a consensus target price of $15.00, indicating a potential upside of 23.82%. Given Composecure's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Composecure is more favorable than Riot Platforms.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Riot Platforms	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	17 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.91
Composecure	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Composecure has a net margin of -56.76% compared to Riot Platforms' net margin of -132.76%. Composecure's return on equity of 12.59% beat Riot Platforms' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Riot Platforms	-132.76%	-28.78%	-21.50%
Composecure	-56.76%	12.59%	9.02%

Composecure has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Riot Platforms. Riot Platforms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Composecure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Riot Platforms	$647.43M	15.27	-$663.18M	-$2.64	N/A
Composecure	$59.82M	58.70	-$136.01M	-$2.40	N/A

40.3% of Riot Platforms shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.6% of Composecure shares are held by institutional investors. 6.9% of Riot Platforms shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 18.4% of Composecure shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Composecure beats Riot Platforms on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Composecure compare to Cipher Mining?

Cipher Mining (NASDAQ:CIFR) and Composecure (NYSE:GPGI) are both mid-cap banking companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, earnings, risk, valuation, institutional ownership and profitability.

12.3% of Cipher Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.6% of Composecure shares are held by institutional investors. 2.6% of Cipher Mining shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 18.4% of Composecure shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Cipher Mining had 18 more articles in the media than Composecure. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Cipher Mining and 0 mentions for Composecure. Cipher Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Composecure's score of 0.00 indicating that Cipher Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Cipher Mining	Positive
Composecure	Neutral

Cipher Mining currently has a consensus price target of $27.69, suggesting a potential upside of 22.35%. Composecure has a consensus price target of $15.00, suggesting a potential upside of 23.82%. Given Composecure's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Composecure is more favorable than Cipher Mining.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cipher Mining	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	15 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.84
Composecure	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Cipher Mining has a beta of 3.18, suggesting that its stock price is 218% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Composecure has a beta of 0.89, suggesting that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

Composecure has a net margin of -56.76% compared to Cipher Mining's net margin of -427.79%. Composecure's return on equity of 12.59% beat Cipher Mining's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cipher Mining	-427.79%	-117.65%	-24.68%
Composecure	-56.76%	12.59%	9.02%

Composecure has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cipher Mining. Cipher Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Composecure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cipher Mining	$223.94M	41.34	-$822.24M	-$2.33	N/A
Composecure	$59.82M	58.70	-$136.01M	-$2.40	N/A

Summary

Composecure beats Cipher Mining on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Composecure News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GPGI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

GPGI vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Composecure	Financial Services Industry	Financial Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$3.34B	$5.50B	$5.74B	$22.81B
Dividend Yield	0.09%	0.09%	5.29%	4.10%
P/E Ratio	-5.05	N/A	16.33	31.00
Price / Sales	58.70	173.41	1,092.78	21.36
Price / Cash	32.40	41.06	89.12	23.95
Price / Book	14.42	3.70	6.51	4.68
Net Income	-$136.01M	-$216.77M	$1.13B	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	2.11%	6.28%	0.64%	1.53%
1 Month Performance	-5.59%	-3.72%	1.17%	1.32%
1 Year Performance	N/A	-10.15%	18.77%	21.42%

Composecure Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
GPGI Composecure	4.0216 of 5 stars	$12.11 +5.2%	$15.00 +23.8%	N/A	$3.34B	$59.82M	N/A	1,007	Positive News
ALLY Ally Financial	4.9822 of 5 stars	$42.10 +0.1%	$54.14 +28.6%	+16.5%	$12.89B	$7.91B	10.27	10,300	Positive News Analyst Downgrade
WULF TeraWulf	4.2438 of 5 stars	$26.49 +3.2%	$28.95 +9.3%	+474.8%	$12.72B	$168.46M	N/A	6	Positive News
BMNR BitMine Immersion Technologies	4.309 of 5 stars	$17.87 -5.2%	$34.50 +93.1%	N/A	$10.74B	$6.09M	N/A	N/A
RIOT Riot Platforms	1.7155 of 5 stars	$27.32 -3.3%	$24.70 -9.6%	+147.8%	$10.68B	$647.43M	N/A	340	Analyst Forecast

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:GPGI) was last updated on 6/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Composecure (GPGI) Competitors

GPGI vs. ALLY, WULF, BMNR, RIOT, and CIFR

How does Composecure compare to Ally Financial?

Summary

How does Composecure compare to TeraWulf?

Summary

How does Composecure compare to BitMine Immersion Technologies?

Summary

How does Composecure compare to Riot Platforms?

Summary

How does Composecure compare to Cipher Mining?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

GPGI vs. The Competition

Composecure Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Composecure (GPGI) Competitors

GPGI vs. ALLY, WULF, BMNR, RIOT, and CIFR

How does Composecure compare to Ally Financial?

Is ALLY or GPGI more profitable?

Does the media prefer ALLY or GPGI?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of ALLY or GPGI?

Do analysts rate ALLY or GPGI?

Which has more risk & volatility, ALLY or GPGI?

Is ALLY or GPGI a better dividend stock?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, ALLY or GPGI?

Summary

How does Composecure compare to TeraWulf?

Which has more risk & volatility, GPGI or WULF?

Do analysts rate GPGI or WULF?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, GPGI or WULF?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in GPGI or WULF?

Is GPGI or WULF more profitable?

Does the media prefer GPGI or WULF?

Summary

How does Composecure compare to BitMine Immersion Technologies?

Do analysts prefer BMNR or GPGI?

Is BMNR or GPGI more profitable?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, BMNR or GPGI?

Is BMNR or GPGI a better dividend stock?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in BMNR or GPGI?

Does the media refer more to BMNR or GPGI?

Summary

How does Composecure compare to Riot Platforms?

Which has more risk & volatility, RIOT or GPGI?

Does the media favor RIOT or GPGI?

Do analysts prefer RIOT or GPGI?

Is RIOT or GPGI more profitable?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, RIOT or GPGI?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in RIOT or GPGI?

Summary

How does Composecure compare to Cipher Mining?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of CIFR or GPGI?

Does the media prefer CIFR or GPGI?

Do analysts recommend CIFR or GPGI?

Which has more volatility and risk, CIFR or GPGI?

Is CIFR or GPGI more profitable?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, CIFR or GPGI?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

GPGI vs. The Competition

Composecure Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools