Which has better earnings & valuation, WULF or BTBT?

Bit Digital has lower revenue, but higher earnings than TeraWulf. TeraWulf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bit Digital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio TeraWulf $168.46M 46.32 -$661.42M -$4.37 N/A Bit Digital $113.56M 4.86 -$80.32M -$1.06 N/A

Is WULF or BTBT more profitable?

Bit Digital has a net margin of -237.19% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -1,179.94%. Bit Digital's return on equity of -10.66% beat TeraWulf's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets TeraWulf -1,179.94% -458.62% -8.54% Bit Digital -237.19% -10.66% -6.81%

Does the media refer more to WULF or BTBT?

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 21 more articles in the media than Bit Digital. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for TeraWulf and 6 mentions for Bit Digital. TeraWulf's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Bit Digital's score of 0.54 indicating that TeraWulf is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment TeraWulf 13 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 4 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Bit Digital 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, CIFR or WULF?

TeraWulf has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cipher Mining. Cipher Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TeraWulf, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Cipher Mining $223.94M 29.23 -$822.24M -$2.86 N/A TeraWulf $168.46M 46.32 -$661.42M -$4.37 N/A

Is CIFR or WULF more profitable?

Cipher Mining has a net margin of -585.75% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -1,179.94%. Cipher Mining's return on equity of -156.28% beat TeraWulf's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Cipher Mining -585.75% -156.28% -21.29% TeraWulf -1,179.94% -458.62% -8.54%

Does the media refer more to CIFR or WULF?

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 17 more articles in the media than Cipher Mining. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for TeraWulf and 10 mentions for Cipher Mining. TeraWulf's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Cipher Mining's score of 0.48 indicating that TeraWulf is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Cipher Mining 4 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral TeraWulf 13 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 4 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has better earnings and valuation, CLSK or WULF?

Cleanspark has higher revenue and earnings than TeraWulf. TeraWulf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cleanspark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Cleanspark $766.31M 4.01 $364.46M -$3.77 N/A TeraWulf $168.46M 46.32 -$661.42M -$4.37 N/A

Is CLSK or WULF more profitable?

Cleanspark has a net margin of -146.90% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -1,179.94%. Cleanspark's return on equity of -18.63% beat TeraWulf's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Cleanspark -146.90% -18.63% -8.15% TeraWulf -1,179.94% -458.62% -8.54%

Does the media refer more to CLSK or WULF?

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 18 more articles in the media than Cleanspark. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for TeraWulf and 9 mentions for Cleanspark. TeraWulf's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Cleanspark's score of 0.42 indicating that TeraWulf is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Cleanspark 4 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral TeraWulf 13 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 4 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor WULF or HIVE?

In the previous week, HIVE Digital Technologies had 33 more articles in the media than TeraWulf. MarketBeat recorded 60 mentions for HIVE Digital Technologies and 27 mentions for TeraWulf. TeraWulf's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat HIVE Digital Technologies' score of 0.58 indicating that TeraWulf is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment TeraWulf 13 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 4 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive HIVE Digital Technologies 15 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 20 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, HUT or WULF?

Hut 8 has higher revenue and earnings than TeraWulf. Hut 8 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TeraWulf, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Hut 8 $235.12M 42.39 -$226.15M -$5.45 N/A TeraWulf $168.46M 46.32 -$661.42M -$4.37 N/A

Is HUT or WULF more profitable?

Hut 8 has a net margin of -188.59% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -1,179.94%. Hut 8's return on equity of -0.97% beat TeraWulf's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Hut 8 -188.59% -0.97% -0.36% TeraWulf -1,179.94% -458.62% -8.54%

Does the media refer more to HUT or WULF?

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 5 more articles in the media than Hut 8. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for TeraWulf and 22 mentions for Hut 8. Hut 8's average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat TeraWulf's score of 0.71 indicating that Hut 8 is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Hut 8 11 Very Positive mention(s) 4 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive TeraWulf 13 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 4 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

TeraWulf (WULF) Competitors

$15.64 -0.81 (-4.92%)

As of 08/21/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Compare

WULF vs. BTBT, CIFR, CLSK, HIVE, and HUT

Should you buy TeraWulf stock or one of its competitors? TeraWulf's main competitors and comparable companies include Bit Digital (BTBT), Cipher Mining (CIFR), Cleanspark (CLSK), HIVE Digital Technologies (HIVE), and Hut 8 (HUT). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "technology" sector.

How does TeraWulf compare to Bit Digital?

TeraWulf (NASDAQ:WULF) and Bit Digital (NASDAQ:BTBT) are both technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, risk, earnings and media sentiment.

62.5% of TeraWulf shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.7% of Bit Digital shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.9% of TeraWulf shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Bit Digital shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

TeraWulf presently has a consensus target price of $34.21, suggesting a potential upside of 118.72%. Bit Digital has a consensus target price of $5.13, suggesting a potential upside of 234.97%. Given Bit Digital's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Bit Digital is more favorable than TeraWulf.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
TeraWulf	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	16 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.90
Bit Digital	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 21 more articles in the media than Bit Digital. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for TeraWulf and 6 mentions for Bit Digital. TeraWulf's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Bit Digital's score of 0.54 indicating that TeraWulf is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
TeraWulf	13 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	4 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Bit Digital	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

TeraWulf has a beta of 3.76, indicating that its share price is 276% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bit Digital has a beta of 4.02, indicating that its share price is 302% more volatile than the broader market.

Bit Digital has a net margin of -237.19% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -1,179.94%. Bit Digital's return on equity of -10.66% beat TeraWulf's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
TeraWulf	-1,179.94%	-458.62%	-8.54%
Bit Digital	-237.19%	-10.66%	-6.81%

Bit Digital has lower revenue, but higher earnings than TeraWulf. TeraWulf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bit Digital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
TeraWulf	$168.46M	46.32	-$661.42M	-$4.37	N/A
Bit Digital	$113.56M	4.86	-$80.32M	-$1.06	N/A

Summary

TeraWulf beats Bit Digital on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TeraWulf compare to Cipher Mining?

Cipher Mining (NASDAQ:CIFR) and TeraWulf (NASDAQ:WULF) are both mid-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, risk, valuation, dividends and earnings.

Cipher Mining has a net margin of -585.75% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -1,179.94%. Cipher Mining's return on equity of -156.28% beat TeraWulf's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cipher Mining	-585.75%	-156.28%	-21.29%
TeraWulf	-1,179.94%	-458.62%	-8.54%

Cipher Mining currently has a consensus price target of $28.61, suggesting a potential upside of 81.43%. TeraWulf has a consensus price target of $34.21, suggesting a potential upside of 118.72%. Given TeraWulf's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe TeraWulf is more favorable than Cipher Mining.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cipher Mining	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	16 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.89
TeraWulf	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	16 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.90

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 17 more articles in the media than Cipher Mining. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for TeraWulf and 10 mentions for Cipher Mining. TeraWulf's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Cipher Mining's score of 0.48 indicating that TeraWulf is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cipher Mining	4 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
TeraWulf	13 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	4 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

12.3% of Cipher Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.5% of TeraWulf shares are held by institutional investors. 3.1% of Cipher Mining shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.9% of TeraWulf shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Cipher Mining has a beta of 3.2, suggesting that its stock price is 220% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TeraWulf has a beta of 3.76, suggesting that its stock price is 276% more volatile than the broader market.

TeraWulf has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cipher Mining. Cipher Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TeraWulf, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cipher Mining	$223.94M	29.23	-$822.24M	-$2.86	N/A
TeraWulf	$168.46M	46.32	-$661.42M	-$4.37	N/A

Summary

TeraWulf beats Cipher Mining on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TeraWulf compare to Cleanspark?

Cleanspark (NASDAQ:CLSK) and TeraWulf (NASDAQ:WULF) are both mid-cap technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Cleanspark presently has a consensus price target of $23.88, indicating a potential upside of 99.37%. TeraWulf has a consensus price target of $34.21, indicating a potential upside of 118.72%. Given TeraWulf's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe TeraWulf is more favorable than Cleanspark.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cleanspark	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88
TeraWulf	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	16 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.90

Cleanspark has a net margin of -146.90% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -1,179.94%. Cleanspark's return on equity of -18.63% beat TeraWulf's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cleanspark	-146.90%	-18.63%	-8.15%
TeraWulf	-1,179.94%	-458.62%	-8.54%

Cleanspark has a beta of 3.86, suggesting that its share price is 286% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TeraWulf has a beta of 3.76, suggesting that its share price is 276% more volatile than the broader market.

43.1% of Cleanspark shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.5% of TeraWulf shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of Cleanspark shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.9% of TeraWulf shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Cleanspark has higher revenue and earnings than TeraWulf. TeraWulf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cleanspark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cleanspark	$766.31M	4.01	$364.46M	-$3.77	N/A
TeraWulf	$168.46M	46.32	-$661.42M	-$4.37	N/A

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 18 more articles in the media than Cleanspark. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for TeraWulf and 9 mentions for Cleanspark. TeraWulf's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Cleanspark's score of 0.42 indicating that TeraWulf is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cleanspark	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
TeraWulf	13 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	4 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

TeraWulf beats Cleanspark on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TeraWulf compare to HIVE Digital Technologies?

TeraWulf (NASDAQ:WULF) and HIVE Digital Technologies (NASDAQ:HIVE) are both technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

TeraWulf has a beta of 3.76, indicating that its stock price is 276% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HIVE Digital Technologies has a beta of 3.78, indicating that its stock price is 278% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, HIVE Digital Technologies had 33 more articles in the media than TeraWulf. MarketBeat recorded 60 mentions for HIVE Digital Technologies and 27 mentions for TeraWulf. TeraWulf's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat HIVE Digital Technologies' score of 0.58 indicating that TeraWulf is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
TeraWulf	13 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	4 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
HIVE Digital Technologies	15 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	20 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

TeraWulf currently has a consensus price target of $34.21, suggesting a potential upside of 118.72%. HIVE Digital Technologies has a consensus price target of $7.00, suggesting a potential upside of 131.02%. Given HIVE Digital Technologies' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe HIVE Digital Technologies is more favorable than TeraWulf.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
TeraWulf	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	16 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.90
HIVE Digital Technologies	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

62.5% of TeraWulf shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.4% of HIVE Digital Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 15.9% of TeraWulf shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.4% of HIVE Digital Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

HIVE Digital Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than TeraWulf. TeraWulf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HIVE Digital Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
TeraWulf	$168.46M	46.32	-$661.42M	-$4.37	N/A
HIVE Digital Technologies	$297.79M	2.79	-$148.45M	-$1.29	N/A

HIVE Digital Technologies has a net margin of -98.49% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -1,179.94%. HIVE Digital Technologies' return on equity of -31.98% beat TeraWulf's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
TeraWulf	-1,179.94%	-458.62%	-8.54%
HIVE Digital Technologies	-98.49%	-31.98%	-23.71%

Summary

HIVE Digital Technologies beats TeraWulf on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TeraWulf compare to Hut 8?

Hut 8 (NASDAQ:HUT) and TeraWulf (NASDAQ:WULF) are both mid-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and profitability.

Hut 8 has a net margin of -188.59% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -1,179.94%. Hut 8's return on equity of -0.97% beat TeraWulf's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hut 8	-188.59%	-0.97%	-0.36%
TeraWulf	-1,179.94%	-458.62%	-8.54%

Hut 8 currently has a consensus price target of $144.89, indicating a potential upside of 79.19%. TeraWulf has a consensus price target of $34.21, indicating a potential upside of 118.72%. Given TeraWulf's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe TeraWulf is more favorable than Hut 8.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hut 8	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	17 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
TeraWulf	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	16 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.90

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 5 more articles in the media than Hut 8. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for TeraWulf and 22 mentions for Hut 8. Hut 8's average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat TeraWulf's score of 0.71 indicating that Hut 8 is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Hut 8	11 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
TeraWulf	13 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	4 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Hut 8 has higher revenue and earnings than TeraWulf. Hut 8 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TeraWulf, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hut 8	$235.12M	42.39	-$226.15M	-$5.45	N/A
TeraWulf	$168.46M	46.32	-$661.42M	-$4.37	N/A

31.8% of Hut 8 shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.5% of TeraWulf shares are held by institutional investors. 10.4% of Hut 8 shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.9% of TeraWulf shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Hut 8 has a beta of 4.64, meaning that its share price is 364% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TeraWulf has a beta of 3.76, meaning that its share price is 276% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Hut 8 beats TeraWulf on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get TeraWulf News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding WULF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

WULF vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	TeraWulf	Software Industry	Technology Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$7.80B	$15.67B	$29.53B	$12.85B
Dividend Yield	N/A	3.42%	2.75%	11.08%
P/E Ratio	-3.58	127.26	73.35	24.24
Price / Sales	46.32	1,303.59	598.84	99.81
Price / Cash	N/A	48.13	50.35	53.99
Price / Book	52.13	7.50	9.44	6.20
Net Income	-$661.42M	$434.60M	$679.74M	$348.59M
7 Day Performance	-10.01%	1.62%	-1.29%	0.08%
1 Month Performance	-22.00%	7.50%	4.03%	3.88%
1 Year Performance	70.74%	5.00%	189.70%	16.98%

TeraWulf Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
WULF TeraWulf	3.6406 of 5 stars	$15.64 -4.9%	$34.21 +118.7%	+70.7%	$7.80B	$168.46M	N/A	6	News Coverage Analyst Forecast Options Volume Gap Up
BTBT Bit Digital	2.6232 of 5 stars	$1.60 +1.9%	$5.13 +220.3%	-46.9%	$566.20M	$113.56M	N/A	10	Gap Up
CIFR Cipher Mining	3.4092 of 5 stars	$18.50 +3.6%	$28.61 +54.7%	+147.2%	$7.41B	$223.94M	N/A	10	Options Volume
CLSK Cleanspark	3.7385 of 5 stars	$12.40 +2.6%	$23.88 +92.6%	+22.0%	$3.10B	$766.31M	N/A	130	News Coverage
HIVE HIVE Digital Technologies	3.3243 of 5 stars	$3.07 +14.1%	$6.95 +126.5%	+20.2%	$722.61M	$297.79M	N/A	20	Trending News Earnings Report Analyst Forecast Insider Trade Analyst Revision Gap Up High Trading Volume

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:WULF) was last updated on 8/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

TeraWulf (WULF) Competitors

WULF vs. BTBT, CIFR, CLSK, HIVE, and HUT

How does TeraWulf compare to Bit Digital?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to Cipher Mining?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to Cleanspark?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to HIVE Digital Technologies?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to Hut 8?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

WULF vs. The Competition

TeraWulf Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

TeraWulf (WULF) Competitors

WULF vs. BTBT, CIFR, CLSK, HIVE, and HUT

How does TeraWulf compare to Bit Digital?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of WULF or BTBT?

Do analysts rate WULF or BTBT?

Does the media refer more to WULF or BTBT?

Which has more risk & volatility, WULF or BTBT?

Is WULF or BTBT more profitable?

Which has better earnings & valuation, WULF or BTBT?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to Cipher Mining?

Is CIFR or WULF more profitable?

Do analysts rate CIFR or WULF?

Does the media refer more to CIFR or WULF?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of CIFR or WULF?

Which has more volatility & risk, CIFR or WULF?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, CIFR or WULF?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to Cleanspark?

Do analysts recommend CLSK or WULF?

Is CLSK or WULF more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, CLSK or WULF?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in CLSK or WULF?

Which has better earnings and valuation, CLSK or WULF?

Does the media refer more to CLSK or WULF?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to HIVE Digital Technologies?

Which has more volatility & risk, WULF or HIVE?

Does the media favor WULF or HIVE?

Do analysts rate WULF or HIVE?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in WULF or HIVE?

Which has better earnings and valuation, WULF or HIVE?

Is WULF or HIVE more profitable?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to Hut 8?

Is HUT or WULF more profitable?

Do analysts rate HUT or WULF?

Does the media refer more to HUT or WULF?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, HUT or WULF?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in HUT or WULF?

Which has more volatility and risk, HUT or WULF?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

WULF vs. The Competition

TeraWulf Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools