TeraWulf (WULF) Competitors

$24.17 +1.05 (+4.54%)

Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$24.12 -0.05 (-0.19%)

As of 07:14 PM Eastern

WULF vs. BTBT, CLSK, HUT, MARA, and RIOT

Should you buy TeraWulf stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares TeraWulf with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with TeraWulf include Bit Digital (BTBT), Cleanspark (CLSK), Hut 8 (HUT), Marathon Digital (MARA), and Riot Platforms (RIOT).

How does TeraWulf compare to Bit Digital?

Bit Digital (NASDAQ:BTBT) and TeraWulf (NASDAQ:WULF) are both banking companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Bit Digital has a beta of 3.95, suggesting that its stock price is 295% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TeraWulf has a beta of 3.84, suggesting that its stock price is 284% more volatile than the broader market.

Bit Digital has a net margin of -70.70% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -611.46%. Bit Digital's return on equity of -5.39% beat TeraWulf's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Bit Digital	-70.70%	-5.39%	-4.48%
TeraWulf	-611.46%	-305.07%	-8.42%

Bit Digital has higher earnings, but lower revenue than TeraWulf. TeraWulf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bit Digital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Bit Digital	$113.56M	6.13	-$80.32M	-$0.55	N/A
TeraWulf	$168.46M	71.10	-$661.42M	-$2.48	N/A

Bit Digital currently has a consensus target price of $5.67, indicating a potential upside of 166.04%. TeraWulf has a consensus target price of $27.55, indicating a potential upside of 14.00%. Given Bit Digital's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Bit Digital is more favorable than TeraWulf.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Bit Digital	2 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
TeraWulf	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80

47.7% of Bit Digital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.5% of TeraWulf shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.8% of Bit Digital shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.9% of TeraWulf shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 20 more articles in the media than Bit Digital. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for TeraWulf and 9 mentions for Bit Digital. Bit Digital's average media sentiment score of 0.49 beat TeraWulf's score of 0.26 indicating that Bit Digital is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Bit Digital	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
TeraWulf	7 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	9 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	3 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Bit Digital beats TeraWulf on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TeraWulf compare to Cleanspark?

Cleanspark (NASDAQ:CLSK) and TeraWulf (NASDAQ:WULF) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment and dividends.

Cleanspark has a beta of 3.71, suggesting that its stock price is 271% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TeraWulf has a beta of 3.84, suggesting that its stock price is 284% more volatile than the broader market.

Cleanspark has a net margin of -67.66% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -611.46%. Cleanspark's return on equity of 7.07% beat TeraWulf's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cleanspark	-67.66%	7.07%	3.77%
TeraWulf	-611.46%	-305.07%	-8.42%

Cleanspark has higher revenue and earnings than TeraWulf. TeraWulf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cleanspark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cleanspark	$739.88M	4.85	$364.46M	-$2.10	N/A
TeraWulf	$168.46M	71.10	-$661.42M	-$2.48	N/A

Cleanspark presently has a consensus target price of $20.44, suggesting a potential upside of 46.23%. TeraWulf has a consensus target price of $27.55, suggesting a potential upside of 14.00%. Given Cleanspark's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Cleanspark is more favorable than TeraWulf.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cleanspark	2 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80
TeraWulf	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80

43.1% of Cleanspark shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.5% of TeraWulf shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of Cleanspark shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.9% of TeraWulf shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Cleanspark had 22 more articles in the media than TeraWulf. MarketBeat recorded 51 mentions for Cleanspark and 29 mentions for TeraWulf. Cleanspark's average media sentiment score of 0.39 beat TeraWulf's score of 0.26 indicating that Cleanspark is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cleanspark	14 Very Positive mention(s)	7 Positive mention(s)	9 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
TeraWulf	7 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	9 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	3 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Cleanspark beats TeraWulf on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TeraWulf compare to Hut 8?

TeraWulf (NASDAQ:WULF) and Hut 8 (NASDAQ:HUT) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation and risk.

TeraWulf has a beta of 3.84, suggesting that its share price is 284% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hut 8 has a beta of 4.48, suggesting that its share price is 348% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 12 more articles in the media than Hut 8. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for TeraWulf and 17 mentions for Hut 8. Hut 8's average media sentiment score of 0.44 beat TeraWulf's score of 0.26 indicating that Hut 8 is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
TeraWulf	7 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	9 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	3 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Hut 8	7 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

TeraWulf presently has a consensus target price of $27.55, suggesting a potential upside of 14.00%. Hut 8 has a consensus target price of $107.72, suggesting a potential downside of 1.51%. Given TeraWulf's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe TeraWulf is more favorable than Hut 8.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
TeraWulf	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80
Hut 8	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	17 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.89

62.5% of TeraWulf shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.8% of Hut 8 shares are held by institutional investors. 15.9% of TeraWulf shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 10.4% of Hut 8 shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Hut 8 has a net margin of -109.77% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -611.46%. Hut 8's return on equity of -0.35% beat TeraWulf's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
TeraWulf	-611.46%	-305.07%	-8.42%
Hut 8	-109.77%	-0.35%	-0.22%

Hut 8 has higher revenue and earnings than TeraWulf. Hut 8 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TeraWulf, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
TeraWulf	$168.46M	71.10	-$661.42M	-$2.48	N/A
Hut 8	$235.12M	52.37	-$226.15M	-$3.00	N/A

Summary

Hut 8 beats TeraWulf on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TeraWulf compare to Marathon Digital?

TeraWulf (NASDAQ:WULF) and Marathon Digital (NASDAQ:MARA) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation and risk.

TeraWulf has a beta of 3.84, suggesting that its share price is 284% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marathon Digital has a beta of 5.41, suggesting that its share price is 441% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 5 more articles in the media than Marathon Digital. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for TeraWulf and 24 mentions for Marathon Digital. Marathon Digital's average media sentiment score of 0.29 beat TeraWulf's score of 0.26 indicating that Marathon Digital is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
TeraWulf	7 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	9 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	3 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Marathon Digital	7 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	8 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

TeraWulf presently has a consensus target price of $27.55, suggesting a potential upside of 14.00%. Marathon Digital has a consensus target price of $18.50, suggesting a potential upside of 39.20%. Given Marathon Digital's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Marathon Digital is more favorable than TeraWulf.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
TeraWulf	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80
Marathon Digital	2 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.45

62.5% of TeraWulf shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 44.5% of Marathon Digital shares are held by institutional investors. 15.9% of TeraWulf shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Marathon Digital shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Marathon Digital has a net margin of -234.83% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -611.46%. Marathon Digital's return on equity of -23.20% beat TeraWulf's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
TeraWulf	-611.46%	-305.07%	-8.42%
Marathon Digital	-234.83%	-23.20%	-12.51%

TeraWulf has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Marathon Digital. TeraWulf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marathon Digital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
TeraWulf	$168.46M	71.10	-$661.42M	-$2.48	N/A
Marathon Digital	$867.82M	5.84	-$1.31B	-$5.72	N/A

Summary

TeraWulf beats Marathon Digital on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TeraWulf compare to Riot Platforms?

TeraWulf (NASDAQ:WULF) and Riot Platforms (NASDAQ:RIOT) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings, profitability, risk, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

TeraWulf has a beta of 3.84, meaning that its stock price is 284% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Riot Platforms has a beta of 3.72, meaning that its stock price is 272% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 18 more articles in the media than Riot Platforms. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for TeraWulf and 11 mentions for Riot Platforms. TeraWulf's average media sentiment score of 0.26 beat Riot Platforms' score of -0.73 indicating that TeraWulf is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
TeraWulf	7 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	9 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	3 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Riot Platforms	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Negative

TeraWulf presently has a consensus target price of $27.55, suggesting a potential upside of 14.00%. Riot Platforms has a consensus target price of $24.40, suggesting a potential downside of 0.89%. Given TeraWulf's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe TeraWulf is more favorable than Riot Platforms.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
TeraWulf	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80
Riot Platforms	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	17 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.86

TeraWulf has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Riot Platforms. TeraWulf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Riot Platforms, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
TeraWulf	$168.46M	71.10	-$661.42M	-$2.48	N/A
Riot Platforms	$647.43M	14.38	-$663.18M	-$2.64	N/A

Riot Platforms has a net margin of -132.76% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -611.46%. Riot Platforms' return on equity of -28.78% beat TeraWulf's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
TeraWulf	-611.46%	-305.07%	-8.42%
Riot Platforms	-132.76%	-28.78%	-21.50%

62.5% of TeraWulf shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.3% of Riot Platforms shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.9% of TeraWulf shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 6.9% of Riot Platforms shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

TeraWulf beats Riot Platforms on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get TeraWulf News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding WULF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

WULF vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	TeraWulf	FIN Industry	Finance Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$11.98B	$7.10B	$13.47B	$12.46B
Dividend Yield	N/A	5.69%	5.82%	5.30%
P/E Ratio	-9.75	90.09	23.18	25.59
Price / Sales	71.10	9.91	170.02	63.24
Price / Cash	N/A	72.39	20.50	55.34
Price / Book	-151.06	2.67	2.15	6.70
Net Income	-$661.42M	$301.20M	$1.11B	$333.77M
7 Day Performance	0.62%	0.86%	-0.67%	0.45%
1 Month Performance	15.37%	3.85%	0.57%	4.06%
1 Year Performance	560.38%	18.98%	11.19%	36.24%

TeraWulf Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
WULF TeraWulf	3.1177 of 5 stars	$24.17 +4.5%	$27.55 +14.0%	+503.4%	$11.98B	$168.46M	N/A	6	Earnings Report Analyst Forecast Analyst Revision
BTBT Bit Digital	3.444 of 5 stars	$2.15 +19.4%	$5.67 +163.6%	-9.4%	$587.84M	$113.56M	N/A	10	Options Volume High Trading Volume
CLSK Cleanspark	2.9784 of 5 stars	$14.30 +0.7%	$20.29 +41.9%	+33.0%	$3.63B	$766.31M	N/A	130	Trending News Earnings Report Analyst Downgrade Options Volume Analyst Revision
HUT Hut 8	1.8443 of 5 stars	$102.19 +3.8%	$99.94 -2.2%	+556.5%	$11.09B	$235.12M	N/A	219	Analyst Forecast Insider Trade Analyst Revision
MARA Marathon Digital	3.0617 of 5 stars	$13.39 +3.5%	$18.50 +38.2%	-22.1%	$4.93B	$907.09M	N/A	9	Analyst Downgrade

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:WULF) was last updated on 5/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

TeraWulf (WULF) Competitors

WULF vs. BTBT, CLSK, HUT, MARA, and RIOT

How does TeraWulf compare to Bit Digital?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to Cleanspark?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to Hut 8?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to Marathon Digital?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to Riot Platforms?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

WULF vs. The Competition

TeraWulf Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

TeraWulf (WULF) Competitors

WULF vs. BTBT, CLSK, HUT, MARA, and RIOT

How does TeraWulf compare to Bit Digital?

Which has more risk and volatility, BTBT or WULF?

Is BTBT or WULF more profitable?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, BTBT or WULF?

Do analysts rate BTBT or WULF?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in BTBT or WULF?

Does the media prefer BTBT or WULF?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to Cleanspark?

Which has more volatility and risk, CLSK or WULF?

Is CLSK or WULF more profitable?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, CLSK or WULF?

Do analysts recommend CLSK or WULF?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of CLSK or WULF?

Does the media favor CLSK or WULF?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to Hut 8?

Which has more volatility & risk, WULF or HUT?

Does the media favor WULF or HUT?

Do analysts prefer WULF or HUT?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of WULF or HUT?

Is WULF or HUT more profitable?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, WULF or HUT?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to Marathon Digital?

Which has more volatility & risk, WULF or MARA?

Does the media favor WULF or MARA?

Do analysts prefer WULF or MARA?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of WULF or MARA?

Is WULF or MARA more profitable?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, WULF or MARA?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to Riot Platforms?

Which has more risk & volatility, WULF or RIOT?

Does the media refer more to WULF or RIOT?

Do analysts prefer WULF or RIOT?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, WULF or RIOT?

Is WULF or RIOT more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of WULF or RIOT?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

WULF vs. The Competition

TeraWulf Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools