Which has better earnings & valuation, BTBT or WULF?

Bit Digital has higher earnings, but lower revenue than TeraWulf. TeraWulf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bit Digital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Bit Digital $116.38M 4.16 -$80.32M -$0.68 N/A TeraWulf $168.46M 55.49 -$661.42M -$2.48 N/A

Is BTBT or WULF more profitable?

Bit Digital has a net margin of -145.39% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -611.46%. Bit Digital's return on equity of -8.44% beat TeraWulf's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Bit Digital -145.39% -8.44% -6.24% TeraWulf -611.46% -305.07% -8.42%

Does the media prefer BTBT or WULF?

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 22 more articles in the media than Bit Digital. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for TeraWulf and 3 mentions for Bit Digital. TeraWulf's average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat Bit Digital's score of 0.59 indicating that TeraWulf is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Bit Digital 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive TeraWulf 10 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 8 Neutral mention(s) 3 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has better valuation and earnings, CLSK or WULF?

Cleanspark has higher revenue and earnings than TeraWulf. TeraWulf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cleanspark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Cleanspark $739.88M 5.03 $364.46M -$2.10 N/A TeraWulf $168.46M 55.49 -$661.42M -$2.48 N/A

Is CLSK or WULF more profitable?

Cleanspark has a net margin of -67.66% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -611.46%. Cleanspark's return on equity of 7.07% beat TeraWulf's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Cleanspark -67.66% 7.07% 3.77% TeraWulf -611.46% -305.07% -8.42%

Does the media prefer CLSK or WULF?

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 4 more articles in the media than Cleanspark. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for TeraWulf and 21 mentions for Cleanspark. TeraWulf's average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat Cleanspark's score of 0.61 indicating that TeraWulf is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Cleanspark 7 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 10 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive TeraWulf 10 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 8 Neutral mention(s) 3 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor WULF or HIVE?

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 20 more articles in the media than HIVE Digital Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for TeraWulf and 5 mentions for HIVE Digital Technologies. HIVE Digital Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat TeraWulf's score of 0.62 indicating that HIVE Digital Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment TeraWulf 10 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 8 Neutral mention(s) 3 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive HIVE Digital Technologies 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, HUT or WULF?

Hut 8 has higher revenue and earnings than TeraWulf. Hut 8 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TeraWulf, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Hut 8 $235.12M 53.68 -$226.15M -$3.00 N/A TeraWulf $168.46M 55.49 -$661.42M -$2.48 N/A

Is HUT or WULF more profitable?

Hut 8 has a net margin of -109.77% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -611.46%. Hut 8's return on equity of -0.35% beat TeraWulf's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Hut 8 -109.77% -0.35% -0.22% TeraWulf -611.46% -305.07% -8.42%

Does the media prefer HUT or WULF?

In the previous week, Hut 8 had 10 more articles in the media than TeraWulf. MarketBeat recorded 35 mentions for Hut 8 and 25 mentions for TeraWulf. Hut 8's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat TeraWulf's score of 0.62 indicating that Hut 8 is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Hut 8 12 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive TeraWulf 10 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 8 Neutral mention(s) 3 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has better earnings & valuation, WULF or IREN?

IREN has higher revenue and earnings than TeraWulf. TeraWulf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than IREN, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio TeraWulf $168.46M 55.49 -$661.42M -$2.48 N/A IREN $501.02M 28.28 $86.94M $0.48 82.60

Is WULF or IREN more profitable?

IREN has a net margin of 20.90% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -611.46%. IREN's return on equity of -13.13% beat TeraWulf's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets TeraWulf -611.46% -305.07% -8.42% IREN 20.90% -13.13% -6.03%

Does the media refer more to WULF or IREN?

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 3 more articles in the media than IREN. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for TeraWulf and 22 mentions for IREN. TeraWulf's average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat IREN's score of 0.46 indicating that TeraWulf is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment TeraWulf 10 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 8 Neutral mention(s) 3 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive IREN 7 Very Positive mention(s) 7 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

TeraWulf (WULF) Competitors

$19.05 +1.39 (+7.88%)

As of 03:36 PM Eastern

Compare

WULF vs. BTBT, CLSK, HIVE, HUT, and IREN

Should you buy TeraWulf stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares TeraWulf with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with TeraWulf include Bit Digital (BTBT), Cleanspark (CLSK), HIVE Digital Technologies (HIVE), Hut 8 (HUT), and IREN (IREN).

How does TeraWulf compare to Bit Digital?

Bit Digital (NASDAQ:BTBT) and TeraWulf (NASDAQ:WULF) are both technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 22 more articles in the media than Bit Digital. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for TeraWulf and 3 mentions for Bit Digital. TeraWulf's average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat Bit Digital's score of 0.59 indicating that TeraWulf is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Bit Digital	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
TeraWulf	10 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	8 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Bit Digital has higher earnings, but lower revenue than TeraWulf. TeraWulf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bit Digital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Bit Digital	$116.38M	4.16	-$80.32M	-$0.68	N/A
TeraWulf	$168.46M	55.49	-$661.42M	-$2.48	N/A

Bit Digital has a net margin of -145.39% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -611.46%. Bit Digital's return on equity of -8.44% beat TeraWulf's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Bit Digital	-145.39%	-8.44%	-6.24%
TeraWulf	-611.46%	-305.07%	-8.42%

Bit Digital has a beta of 4.02, indicating that its share price is 302% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TeraWulf has a beta of 3.76, indicating that its share price is 276% more volatile than the broader market.

47.7% of Bit Digital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.5% of TeraWulf shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Bit Digital shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.9% of TeraWulf shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Bit Digital currently has a consensus target price of $5.13, indicating a potential upside of 270.04%. TeraWulf has a consensus target price of $34.74, indicating a potential upside of 84.15%. Given Bit Digital's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Bit Digital is more favorable than TeraWulf.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Bit Digital	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40
TeraWulf	2 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	15 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.85

Summary

TeraWulf beats Bit Digital on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TeraWulf compare to Cleanspark?

Cleanspark (NASDAQ:CLSK) and TeraWulf (NASDAQ:WULF) are both mid-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk and valuation.

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 4 more articles in the media than Cleanspark. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for TeraWulf and 21 mentions for Cleanspark. TeraWulf's average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat Cleanspark's score of 0.61 indicating that TeraWulf is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cleanspark	7 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	10 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
TeraWulf	10 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	8 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Cleanspark currently has a consensus price target of $23.88, indicating a potential upside of 64.61%. TeraWulf has a consensus price target of $34.74, indicating a potential upside of 84.15%. Given TeraWulf's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe TeraWulf is more favorable than Cleanspark.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cleanspark	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88
TeraWulf	2 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	15 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.85

Cleanspark has a beta of 3.83, suggesting that its share price is 283% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TeraWulf has a beta of 3.76, suggesting that its share price is 276% more volatile than the broader market.

43.1% of Cleanspark shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.5% of TeraWulf shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of Cleanspark shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.9% of TeraWulf shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Cleanspark has a net margin of -67.66% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -611.46%. Cleanspark's return on equity of 7.07% beat TeraWulf's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cleanspark	-67.66%	7.07%	3.77%
TeraWulf	-611.46%	-305.07%	-8.42%

Cleanspark has higher revenue and earnings than TeraWulf. TeraWulf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cleanspark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cleanspark	$739.88M	5.03	$364.46M	-$2.10	N/A
TeraWulf	$168.46M	55.49	-$661.42M	-$2.48	N/A

Summary

Cleanspark beats TeraWulf on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TeraWulf compare to HIVE Digital Technologies?

TeraWulf (NASDAQ:WULF) and HIVE Digital Technologies (NASDAQ:HIVE) are both technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and media sentiment.

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 20 more articles in the media than HIVE Digital Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for TeraWulf and 5 mentions for HIVE Digital Technologies. HIVE Digital Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat TeraWulf's score of 0.62 indicating that HIVE Digital Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
TeraWulf	10 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	8 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
HIVE Digital Technologies	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

TeraWulf presently has a consensus target price of $34.74, indicating a potential upside of 84.15%. HIVE Digital Technologies has a consensus target price of $6.95, indicating a potential upside of 139.40%. Given HIVE Digital Technologies' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe HIVE Digital Technologies is more favorable than TeraWulf.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
TeraWulf	2 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	15 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.85
HIVE Digital Technologies	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.60

TeraWulf has a beta of 3.76, indicating that its stock price is 276% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HIVE Digital Technologies has a beta of 3.79, indicating that its stock price is 279% more volatile than the broader market.

62.5% of TeraWulf shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.4% of HIVE Digital Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.9% of TeraWulf shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

HIVE Digital Technologies has a net margin of -49.21% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -611.46%. HIVE Digital Technologies' return on equity of -23.12% beat TeraWulf's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
TeraWulf	-611.46%	-305.07%	-8.42%
HIVE Digital Technologies	-49.21%	-23.12%	-20.33%

HIVE Digital Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than TeraWulf. TeraWulf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HIVE Digital Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
TeraWulf	$168.46M	55.49	-$661.42M	-$2.48	N/A
HIVE Digital Technologies	$297.79M	2.62	-$148.45M	-$0.56	N/A

Summary

HIVE Digital Technologies beats TeraWulf on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TeraWulf compare to Hut 8?

Hut 8 (NASDAQ:HUT) and TeraWulf (NASDAQ:WULF) are both technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Hut 8 had 10 more articles in the media than TeraWulf. MarketBeat recorded 35 mentions for Hut 8 and 25 mentions for TeraWulf. Hut 8's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat TeraWulf's score of 0.62 indicating that Hut 8 is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Hut 8	12 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
TeraWulf	10 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	8 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

31.8% of Hut 8 shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.5% of TeraWulf shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.4% of Hut 8 shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.9% of TeraWulf shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Hut 8 presently has a consensus price target of $138.85, suggesting a potential upside of 23.86%. TeraWulf has a consensus price target of $34.74, suggesting a potential upside of 84.15%. Given TeraWulf's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe TeraWulf is more favorable than Hut 8.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hut 8	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	18 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.89
TeraWulf	2 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	15 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.85

Hut 8 has a beta of 4.64, meaning that its share price is 364% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TeraWulf has a beta of 3.76, meaning that its share price is 276% more volatile than the broader market.

Hut 8 has a net margin of -109.77% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -611.46%. Hut 8's return on equity of -0.35% beat TeraWulf's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hut 8	-109.77%	-0.35%	-0.22%
TeraWulf	-611.46%	-305.07%	-8.42%

Hut 8 has higher revenue and earnings than TeraWulf. Hut 8 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TeraWulf, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hut 8	$235.12M	53.68	-$226.15M	-$3.00	N/A
TeraWulf	$168.46M	55.49	-$661.42M	-$2.48	N/A

Summary

Hut 8 beats TeraWulf on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TeraWulf compare to IREN?

TeraWulf (NASDAQ:WULF) and IREN (NASDAQ:IREN) are both technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and profitability.

IREN has a net margin of 20.90% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -611.46%. IREN's return on equity of -13.13% beat TeraWulf's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
TeraWulf	-611.46%	-305.07%	-8.42%
IREN	20.90%	-13.13%	-6.03%

IREN has higher revenue and earnings than TeraWulf. TeraWulf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than IREN, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
TeraWulf	$168.46M	55.49	-$661.42M	-$2.48	N/A
IREN	$501.02M	28.28	$86.94M	$0.48	82.60

TeraWulf has a beta of 3.76, suggesting that its share price is 276% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, IREN has a beta of 4.29, suggesting that its share price is 329% more volatile than the broader market.

TeraWulf currently has a consensus target price of $34.74, suggesting a potential upside of 84.15%. IREN has a consensus target price of $82.71, suggesting a potential upside of 108.63%. Given IREN's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe IREN is more favorable than TeraWulf.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
TeraWulf	2 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	15 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.85
IREN	2 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	14 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 3 more articles in the media than IREN. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for TeraWulf and 22 mentions for IREN. TeraWulf's average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat IREN's score of 0.46 indicating that TeraWulf is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
TeraWulf	10 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	8 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
IREN	7 Very Positive mention(s)	7 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

62.5% of TeraWulf shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.1% of IREN shares are held by institutional investors. 15.9% of TeraWulf shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.0% of IREN shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

IREN beats TeraWulf on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get TeraWulf News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding WULF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

WULF vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	TeraWulf	Software Industry	Technology Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$9.37B	$15.04B	$28.44B	$12.69B
Dividend Yield	N/A	3.44%	2.77%	10.03%
P/E Ratio	-7.63	131.16	80.85	25.11
Price / Sales	55.49	1,292.38	596.58	79.56
Price / Cash	N/A	40.66	45.04	34.82
Price / Book	55.48	8.10	7.79	6.20
Net Income	-$661.42M	$437.13M	$662.76M	$347.60M
7 Day Performance	4.91%	1.42%	1.69%	0.81%
1 Month Performance	-10.94%	-1.16%	-3.08%	-3.68%
1 Year Performance	296.28%	7.97%	151.06%	20.29%

TeraWulf Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
WULF TeraWulf	3.9946 of 5 stars	$19.05 +7.9%	$34.74 +82.3%	+271.0%	$9.44B	$168.46M	N/A	6	Upcoming Earnings Analyst Forecast
BTBT Bit Digital	3.177 of 5 stars	$1.35 -1.5%	$5.13 +279.6%	-51.8%	$478.39M	$113.56M	N/A	10	News Coverage
CLSK Cleanspark	3.6616 of 5 stars	$14.02 -3.4%	$22.50 +60.5%	+31.8%	$3.73B	$739.88M	N/A	130	Upcoming Earnings Analyst Forecast
HIVE HIVE Digital Technologies	2.8059 of 5 stars	$2.95 -0.3%	$6.95 +135.7%	+39.4%	$782.77M	$297.79M	N/A	20	Gap Up
HUT Hut 8	3.9709 of 5 stars	$104.59 -4.9%	$133.10 +27.3%	+444.1%	$12.38B	$235.12M	N/A	219	Upcoming Earnings Analyst Downgrade Gap Down

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:WULF) was last updated on 8/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

TeraWulf (WULF) Competitors

WULF vs. BTBT, CLSK, HIVE, HUT, and IREN

How does TeraWulf compare to Bit Digital?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to Cleanspark?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to HIVE Digital Technologies?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to Hut 8?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to IREN?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

WULF vs. The Competition

TeraWulf Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

TeraWulf (WULF) Competitors

WULF vs. BTBT, CLSK, HIVE, HUT, and IREN

How does TeraWulf compare to Bit Digital?

Does the media prefer BTBT or WULF?

Which has better earnings & valuation, BTBT or WULF?

Is BTBT or WULF more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, BTBT or WULF?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in BTBT or WULF?

Do analysts prefer BTBT or WULF?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to Cleanspark?

Does the media prefer CLSK or WULF?

Do analysts recommend CLSK or WULF?

Which has more risk & volatility, CLSK or WULF?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in CLSK or WULF?

Is CLSK or WULF more profitable?

Which has better valuation and earnings, CLSK or WULF?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to HIVE Digital Technologies?

Does the media favor WULF or HIVE?

Do analysts recommend WULF or HIVE?

Which has more risk & volatility, WULF or HIVE?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in WULF or HIVE?

Is WULF or HIVE more profitable?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, WULF or HIVE?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to Hut 8?

Does the media prefer HUT or WULF?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of HUT or WULF?

Do analysts rate HUT or WULF?

Which has more volatility and risk, HUT or WULF?

Is HUT or WULF more profitable?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, HUT or WULF?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to IREN?

Is WULF or IREN more profitable?

Which has better earnings & valuation, WULF or IREN?

Which has more risk and volatility, WULF or IREN?

Do analysts rate WULF or IREN?

Does the media refer more to WULF or IREN?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in WULF or IREN?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

WULF vs. The Competition

TeraWulf Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools