Which has stronger earnings & valuation, WULF or BTBT?

Bit Digital has lower revenue, but higher earnings than TeraWulf. TeraWulf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bit Digital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio TeraWulf $168.46M 45.52 -$661.42M -$4.37 N/A Bit Digital $113.56M 5.22 -$80.32M -$1.06 N/A

Is WULF or BTBT more profitable?

Bit Digital has a net margin of -237.19% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -1,179.94%. Bit Digital's return on equity of -10.66% beat TeraWulf's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets TeraWulf -1,179.94% -458.62% -8.54% Bit Digital -237.19% -10.66% -6.81%

Does the media refer more to WULF or BTBT?

In the previous week, Bit Digital had 1 more articles in the media than TeraWulf. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Bit Digital and 8 mentions for TeraWulf. Bit Digital's average media sentiment score of 0.35 beat TeraWulf's score of 0.25 indicating that Bit Digital is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment TeraWulf 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Bit Digital 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has higher earnings & valuation, CIFR or WULF?

TeraWulf has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cipher Mining. Cipher Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TeraWulf, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Cipher Mining $223.94M 28.83 -$822.24M -$2.86 N/A TeraWulf $168.46M 45.52 -$661.42M -$4.37 N/A

Is CIFR or WULF more profitable?

Cipher Mining has a net margin of -585.75% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -1,179.94%. Cipher Mining's return on equity of -156.28% beat TeraWulf's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Cipher Mining -585.75% -156.28% -21.29% TeraWulf -1,179.94% -458.62% -8.54%

Does the media favor CIFR or WULF?

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 2 more articles in the media than Cipher Mining. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for TeraWulf and 6 mentions for Cipher Mining. TeraWulf's average media sentiment score of 0.25 beat Cipher Mining's score of 0.25 indicating that TeraWulf is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Cipher Mining 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral TeraWulf 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has better valuation and earnings, WULF or CLSK?

Cleanspark has higher revenue and earnings than TeraWulf. TeraWulf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cleanspark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio TeraWulf $168.46M 45.52 -$661.42M -$4.37 N/A Cleanspark $766.31M 4.23 $364.46M -$3.77 N/A

Is WULF or CLSK more profitable?

Cleanspark has a net margin of -146.90% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -1,179.94%. Cleanspark's return on equity of -18.63% beat TeraWulf's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets TeraWulf -1,179.94% -458.62% -8.54% Cleanspark -146.90% -18.63% -8.15%

Does the media refer more to WULF or CLSK?

In the previous week, Cleanspark had 2 more articles in the media than TeraWulf. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Cleanspark and 8 mentions for TeraWulf. Cleanspark's average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat TeraWulf's score of 0.25 indicating that Cleanspark is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment TeraWulf 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Cleanspark 2 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media refer more to WULF or HIVE?

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 6 more articles in the media than HIVE Digital Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for TeraWulf and 2 mentions for HIVE Digital Technologies. TeraWulf's average media sentiment score of 0.25 beat HIVE Digital Technologies' score of -0.02 indicating that TeraWulf is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment TeraWulf 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral HIVE Digital Technologies 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has better valuation & earnings, WULF or HUT?

Hut 8 has higher revenue and earnings than TeraWulf. Hut 8 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TeraWulf, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio TeraWulf $168.46M 45.52 -$661.42M -$4.37 N/A Hut 8 $235.12M 47.02 -$226.15M -$5.45 N/A

Is WULF or HUT more profitable?

Hut 8 has a net margin of -188.59% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -1,179.94%. Hut 8's return on equity of -0.97% beat TeraWulf's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets TeraWulf -1,179.94% -458.62% -8.54% Hut 8 -188.59% -0.97% -0.36%

Does the media favor WULF or HUT?

In the previous week, Hut 8 had 4 more articles in the media than TeraWulf. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Hut 8 and 8 mentions for TeraWulf. Hut 8's average media sentiment score of 0.45 beat TeraWulf's score of 0.25 indicating that Hut 8 is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment TeraWulf 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Hut 8 3 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

TeraWulf (WULF) Competitors

$15.49 +0.58 (+3.89%)

Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$15.49 0.00 (0.00%)

As of 07:59 PM Eastern

Compare

WULF vs. BTBT, CIFR, CLSK, HIVE, and HUT

Should you buy TeraWulf stock or one of its competitors? TeraWulf's main competitors and comparable companies include Bit Digital (BTBT), Cipher Mining (CIFR), Cleanspark (CLSK), HIVE Digital Technologies (HIVE), and Hut 8 (HUT). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "technology" sector.

How does TeraWulf compare to Bit Digital?

TeraWulf (NASDAQ:WULF) and Bit Digital (NASDAQ:BTBT) are both technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings and risk.

Bit Digital has lower revenue, but higher earnings than TeraWulf. TeraWulf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bit Digital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
TeraWulf	$168.46M	45.52	-$661.42M	-$4.37	N/A
Bit Digital	$113.56M	5.22	-$80.32M	-$1.06	N/A

62.5% of TeraWulf shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.7% of Bit Digital shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.9% of TeraWulf shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Bit Digital shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Bit Digital has a net margin of -237.19% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -1,179.94%. Bit Digital's return on equity of -10.66% beat TeraWulf's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
TeraWulf	-1,179.94%	-458.62%	-8.54%
Bit Digital	-237.19%	-10.66%	-6.81%

In the previous week, Bit Digital had 1 more articles in the media than TeraWulf. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Bit Digital and 8 mentions for TeraWulf. Bit Digital's average media sentiment score of 0.35 beat TeraWulf's score of 0.25 indicating that Bit Digital is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
TeraWulf	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Bit Digital	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

TeraWulf presently has a consensus target price of $33.33, indicating a potential upside of 116.86%. Bit Digital has a consensus target price of $4.38, indicating a potential upside of 165.96%. Given Bit Digital's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Bit Digital is more favorable than TeraWulf.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
TeraWulf	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	18 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.92
Bit Digital	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.71

TeraWulf has a beta of 3.8, meaning that its stock price is 280% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bit Digital has a beta of 3.83, meaning that its stock price is 283% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Bit Digital beats TeraWulf on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TeraWulf compare to Cipher Mining?

Cipher Mining (NASDAQ:CIFR) and TeraWulf (NASDAQ:WULF) are both mid-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, earnings, dividends, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Cipher Mining has a net margin of -585.75% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -1,179.94%. Cipher Mining's return on equity of -156.28% beat TeraWulf's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cipher Mining	-585.75%	-156.28%	-21.29%
TeraWulf	-1,179.94%	-458.62%	-8.54%

TeraWulf has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cipher Mining. Cipher Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TeraWulf, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cipher Mining	$223.94M	28.83	-$822.24M	-$2.86	N/A
TeraWulf	$168.46M	45.52	-$661.42M	-$4.37	N/A

Cipher Mining has a beta of 3.19, meaning that its stock price is 219% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TeraWulf has a beta of 3.8, meaning that its stock price is 280% more volatile than the broader market.

Cipher Mining presently has a consensus target price of $28.86, indicating a potential upside of 85.55%. TeraWulf has a consensus target price of $33.33, indicating a potential upside of 116.86%. Given TeraWulf's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe TeraWulf is more favorable than Cipher Mining.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cipher Mining	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	16 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.81
TeraWulf	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	18 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.92

12.3% of Cipher Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.5% of TeraWulf shares are held by institutional investors. 3.1% of Cipher Mining shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.9% of TeraWulf shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 2 more articles in the media than Cipher Mining. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for TeraWulf and 6 mentions for Cipher Mining. TeraWulf's average media sentiment score of 0.25 beat Cipher Mining's score of 0.25 indicating that TeraWulf is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cipher Mining	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
TeraWulf	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

TeraWulf beats Cipher Mining on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TeraWulf compare to Cleanspark?

TeraWulf (NASDAQ:WULF) and Cleanspark (NASDAQ:CLSK) are both mid-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment and valuation.

62.5% of TeraWulf shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.1% of Cleanspark shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.9% of TeraWulf shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Cleanspark shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Cleanspark has a net margin of -146.90% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -1,179.94%. Cleanspark's return on equity of -18.63% beat TeraWulf's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
TeraWulf	-1,179.94%	-458.62%	-8.54%
Cleanspark	-146.90%	-18.63%	-8.15%

TeraWulf presently has a consensus target price of $33.33, suggesting a potential upside of 116.86%. Cleanspark has a consensus target price of $23.88, suggesting a potential upside of 89.44%. Given TeraWulf's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe TeraWulf is more favorable than Cleanspark.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
TeraWulf	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	18 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.92
Cleanspark	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88

In the previous week, Cleanspark had 2 more articles in the media than TeraWulf. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Cleanspark and 8 mentions for TeraWulf. Cleanspark's average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat TeraWulf's score of 0.25 indicating that Cleanspark is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
TeraWulf	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Cleanspark	2 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

TeraWulf has a beta of 3.8, meaning that its share price is 280% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cleanspark has a beta of 3.84, meaning that its share price is 284% more volatile than the broader market.

Cleanspark has higher revenue and earnings than TeraWulf. TeraWulf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cleanspark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
TeraWulf	$168.46M	45.52	-$661.42M	-$4.37	N/A
Cleanspark	$766.31M	4.23	$364.46M	-$3.77	N/A

Summary

Cleanspark beats TeraWulf on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TeraWulf compare to HIVE Digital Technologies?

TeraWulf (NASDAQ:WULF) and HIVE Digital Technologies (NASDAQ:HIVE) are both technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

TeraWulf has a beta of 3.8, meaning that its share price is 280% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HIVE Digital Technologies has a beta of 3.76, meaning that its share price is 276% more volatile than the broader market.

HIVE Digital Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than TeraWulf. TeraWulf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HIVE Digital Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
TeraWulf	$168.46M	45.52	-$661.42M	-$4.37	N/A
HIVE Digital Technologies	$297.79M	2.74	-$148.45M	-$1.29	N/A

HIVE Digital Technologies has a net margin of -98.49% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -1,179.94%. HIVE Digital Technologies' return on equity of -31.98% beat TeraWulf's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
TeraWulf	-1,179.94%	-458.62%	-8.54%
HIVE Digital Technologies	-98.49%	-31.98%	-23.71%

TeraWulf currently has a consensus price target of $33.33, suggesting a potential upside of 116.86%. HIVE Digital Technologies has a consensus price target of $6.95, suggesting a potential upside of 134.40%. Given HIVE Digital Technologies' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe HIVE Digital Technologies is more favorable than TeraWulf.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
TeraWulf	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	18 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.92
HIVE Digital Technologies	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 6 more articles in the media than HIVE Digital Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for TeraWulf and 2 mentions for HIVE Digital Technologies. TeraWulf's average media sentiment score of 0.25 beat HIVE Digital Technologies' score of -0.02 indicating that TeraWulf is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
TeraWulf	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
HIVE Digital Technologies	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

62.5% of TeraWulf shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.4% of HIVE Digital Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.9% of TeraWulf shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.4% of HIVE Digital Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

TeraWulf beats HIVE Digital Technologies on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TeraWulf compare to Hut 8?

TeraWulf (NASDAQ:WULF) and Hut 8 (NASDAQ:HUT) are both technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings and institutional ownership.

TeraWulf has a beta of 3.8, indicating that its share price is 280% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hut 8 has a beta of 4.62, indicating that its share price is 362% more volatile than the broader market.

TeraWulf currently has a consensus price target of $33.33, suggesting a potential upside of 116.86%. Hut 8 has a consensus price target of $143.95, suggesting a potential upside of 60.49%. Given TeraWulf's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe TeraWulf is more favorable than Hut 8.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
TeraWulf	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	18 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.92
Hut 8	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	19 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Hut 8 has higher revenue and earnings than TeraWulf. Hut 8 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TeraWulf, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
TeraWulf	$168.46M	45.52	-$661.42M	-$4.37	N/A
Hut 8	$235.12M	47.02	-$226.15M	-$5.45	N/A

62.5% of TeraWulf shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.8% of Hut 8 shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.9% of TeraWulf shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.4% of Hut 8 shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Hut 8 had 4 more articles in the media than TeraWulf. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Hut 8 and 8 mentions for TeraWulf. Hut 8's average media sentiment score of 0.45 beat TeraWulf's score of 0.25 indicating that Hut 8 is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
TeraWulf	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Hut 8	3 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Hut 8 has a net margin of -188.59% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -1,179.94%. Hut 8's return on equity of -0.97% beat TeraWulf's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
TeraWulf	-1,179.94%	-458.62%	-8.54%
Hut 8	-188.59%	-0.97%	-0.36%

Summary

Hut 8 beats TeraWulf on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get TeraWulf News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding WULF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

WULF vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	TeraWulf	Software Industry	Technology Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$7.44B	$16.16B	$31.50B	$13.10B
Dividend Yield	N/A	3.42%	2.75%	16.76%
P/E Ratio	-3.54	143.81	81.31	26.04
Price / Sales	45.88	1,281.25	586.85	91.49
Price / Cash	N/A	45.82	50.07	51.75
Price / Book	45.56	8.78	8.10	6.30
Net Income	-$661.42M	$431.57M	$702.36M	$361.43M
7 Day Performance	-1.59%	262.03%	114.88%	-1.67%
1 Month Performance	4.52%	165.57%	74.29%	-3.94%
1 Year Performance	33.77%	-0.50%	168.48%	2.77%

TeraWulf Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
WULF TeraWulf	3.4199 of 5 stars	$15.49 +3.9%	$33.33 +115.1%	+30.0%	$7.44B	$168.46M	N/A	141	Gap Up
BTBT Bit Digital	4.1363 of 5 stars	$1.68 -4.5%	$4.38 +160.4%	-50.6%	$634.72M	$113.56M	N/A	104	Gap Up
CIFR Cipher Mining	2.8342 of 5 stars	$16.74 -5.6%	$28.86 +72.4%	+22.7%	$7.36B	$223.94M	N/A	10	Gap Down
CLSK Cleanspark	2.4913 of 5 stars	$13.34 -4.4%	$23.88 +79.0%	-14.2%	$3.58B	$766.31M	N/A	314	Gap Up
HIVE HIVE Digital Technologies	2.6962 of 5 stars	$3.04 -3.8%	$6.95 +128.6%	-29.8%	$865.44M	$297.79M	N/A	29

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:WULF) was last updated on 10/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

TeraWulf (WULF) Competitors

WULF vs. BTBT, CIFR, CLSK, HIVE, and HUT

How does TeraWulf compare to Bit Digital?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to Cipher Mining?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to Cleanspark?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to HIVE Digital Technologies?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to Hut 8?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

WULF vs. The Competition

TeraWulf Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

TeraWulf (WULF) Competitors

WULF vs. BTBT, CIFR, CLSK, HIVE, and HUT

How does TeraWulf compare to Bit Digital?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, WULF or BTBT?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in WULF or BTBT?

Is WULF or BTBT more profitable?

Does the media refer more to WULF or BTBT?

Do analysts rate WULF or BTBT?

Which has more volatility and risk, WULF or BTBT?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to Cipher Mining?

Is CIFR or WULF more profitable?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, CIFR or WULF?

Which has more volatility and risk, CIFR or WULF?

Do analysts recommend CIFR or WULF?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in CIFR or WULF?

Does the media favor CIFR or WULF?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to Cleanspark?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of WULF or CLSK?

Is WULF or CLSK more profitable?

Do analysts prefer WULF or CLSK?

Does the media refer more to WULF or CLSK?

Which has more volatility and risk, WULF or CLSK?

Which has better valuation and earnings, WULF or CLSK?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to HIVE Digital Technologies?

Which has more risk & volatility, WULF or HIVE?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, WULF or HIVE?

Is WULF or HIVE more profitable?

Do analysts prefer WULF or HIVE?

Does the media refer more to WULF or HIVE?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in WULF or HIVE?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to Hut 8?

Which has more volatility & risk, WULF or HUT?

Do analysts prefer WULF or HUT?

Which has better valuation & earnings, WULF or HUT?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of WULF or HUT?

Does the media favor WULF or HUT?

Is WULF or HUT more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

WULF vs. The Competition

TeraWulf Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools