Which has better earnings & valuation, WULF or BTBT?

Bit Digital has lower revenue, but higher earnings than TeraWulf. TeraWulf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bit Digital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio TeraWulf $168.46M 76.95 -$661.42M -$2.48 N/A Bit Digital $113.56M 5.69 -$80.32M -$0.68 N/A

Is WULF or BTBT more profitable?

Bit Digital has a net margin of -145.39% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -611.46%. Bit Digital's return on equity of -8.44% beat TeraWulf's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets TeraWulf -611.46% -305.07% -8.42% Bit Digital -145.39% -8.44% -6.24%

Does the media favor WULF or BTBT?

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 12 more articles in the media than Bit Digital. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for TeraWulf and 6 mentions for Bit Digital. TeraWulf's average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat Bit Digital's score of 0.25 indicating that TeraWulf is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment TeraWulf 6 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Bit Digital 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, WULF or CLSK?

Cleanspark has higher revenue and earnings than TeraWulf. TeraWulf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cleanspark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio TeraWulf $168.46M 76.95 -$661.42M -$2.48 N/A Cleanspark $766.31M 5.90 $364.46M -$2.10 N/A

Is WULF or CLSK more profitable?

Cleanspark has a net margin of -67.66% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -611.46%. Cleanspark's return on equity of 7.07% beat TeraWulf's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets TeraWulf -611.46% -305.07% -8.42% Cleanspark -67.66% 7.07% 3.77%

Does the media prefer WULF or CLSK?

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 11 more articles in the media than Cleanspark. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for TeraWulf and 7 mentions for Cleanspark. TeraWulf's average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat Cleanspark's score of -0.07 indicating that TeraWulf is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment TeraWulf 6 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Cleanspark 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 3 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has higher valuation & earnings, WULF or HUT?

Hut 8 has higher revenue and earnings than TeraWulf. Hut 8 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TeraWulf, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio TeraWulf $168.46M 76.95 -$661.42M -$2.48 N/A Hut 8 $235.12M 62.87 -$226.15M -$3.00 N/A

Is WULF or HUT more profitable?

Hut 8 has a net margin of -109.77% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -611.46%. Hut 8's return on equity of -0.35% beat TeraWulf's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets TeraWulf -611.46% -305.07% -8.42% Hut 8 -109.77% -0.35% -0.22%

Does the media prefer WULF or HUT?

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 6 more articles in the media than Hut 8. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for TeraWulf and 12 mentions for Hut 8. Hut 8's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat TeraWulf's score of 0.51 indicating that Hut 8 is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment TeraWulf 6 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Hut 8 5 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor MARA or WULF?

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 4 more articles in the media than Marathon Digital. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for TeraWulf and 14 mentions for Marathon Digital. Marathon Digital's average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat TeraWulf's score of 0.51 indicating that Marathon Digital is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Marathon Digital 3 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive TeraWulf 6 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has higher valuation and earnings, RIOT or WULF?

TeraWulf has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Riot Platforms. TeraWulf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Riot Platforms, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Riot Platforms $647.43M 16.15 -$663.18M -$2.64 N/A TeraWulf $168.46M 76.95 -$661.42M -$2.48 N/A

Is RIOT or WULF more profitable?

Riot Platforms has a net margin of -132.76% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -611.46%. Riot Platforms' return on equity of -28.78% beat TeraWulf's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Riot Platforms -132.76% -28.78% -21.50% TeraWulf -611.46% -305.07% -8.42%

Does the media favor RIOT or WULF?

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 10 more articles in the media than Riot Platforms. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for TeraWulf and 8 mentions for Riot Platforms. TeraWulf's average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat Riot Platforms' score of -0.22 indicating that TeraWulf is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Riot Platforms 0 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral TeraWulf 6 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

TeraWulf (WULF) Competitors

$26.16 -0.33 (-1.25%)

Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$25.44 -0.72 (-2.75%)

As of 07:59 PM Eastern

Compare

WULF vs. BTBT, CLSK, HUT, MARA, and RIOT

Should you buy TeraWulf stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares TeraWulf with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with TeraWulf include Bit Digital (BTBT), Cleanspark (CLSK), Hut 8 (HUT), Marathon Digital (MARA), and Riot Platforms (RIOT).

How does TeraWulf compare to Bit Digital?

TeraWulf (NASDAQ:WULF) and Bit Digital (NASDAQ:BTBT) are both banking companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, risk and profitability.

TeraWulf presently has a consensus target price of $31.72, suggesting a potential upside of 21.24%. Bit Digital has a consensus target price of $5.67, suggesting a potential upside of 206.31%. Given Bit Digital's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Bit Digital is more favorable than TeraWulf.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
TeraWulf	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	14 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88
Bit Digital	2 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 12 more articles in the media than Bit Digital. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for TeraWulf and 6 mentions for Bit Digital. TeraWulf's average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat Bit Digital's score of 0.25 indicating that TeraWulf is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
TeraWulf	6 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Bit Digital	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Bit Digital has a net margin of -145.39% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -611.46%. Bit Digital's return on equity of -8.44% beat TeraWulf's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
TeraWulf	-611.46%	-305.07%	-8.42%
Bit Digital	-145.39%	-8.44%	-6.24%

62.5% of TeraWulf shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.7% of Bit Digital shares are held by institutional investors. 15.9% of TeraWulf shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Bit Digital shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Bit Digital has lower revenue, but higher earnings than TeraWulf. TeraWulf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bit Digital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
TeraWulf	$168.46M	76.95	-$661.42M	-$2.48	N/A
Bit Digital	$113.56M	5.69	-$80.32M	-$0.68	N/A

TeraWulf has a beta of 3.82, indicating that its share price is 282% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bit Digital has a beta of 3.98, indicating that its share price is 298% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

TeraWulf beats Bit Digital on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TeraWulf compare to Cleanspark?

TeraWulf (NASDAQ:WULF) and Cleanspark (NASDAQ:CLSK) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability and dividends.

Cleanspark has a net margin of -67.66% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -611.46%. Cleanspark's return on equity of 7.07% beat TeraWulf's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
TeraWulf	-611.46%	-305.07%	-8.42%
Cleanspark	-67.66%	7.07%	3.77%

TeraWulf presently has a consensus price target of $31.72, suggesting a potential upside of 21.24%. Cleanspark has a consensus price target of $20.44, suggesting a potential upside of 16.08%. Given TeraWulf's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe TeraWulf is more favorable than Cleanspark.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
TeraWulf	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	14 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88
Cleanspark	2 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80

TeraWulf has a beta of 3.82, suggesting that its share price is 282% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cleanspark has a beta of 3.79, suggesting that its share price is 279% more volatile than the broader market.

Cleanspark has higher revenue and earnings than TeraWulf. TeraWulf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cleanspark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
TeraWulf	$168.46M	76.95	-$661.42M	-$2.48	N/A
Cleanspark	$766.31M	5.90	$364.46M	-$2.10	N/A

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 11 more articles in the media than Cleanspark. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for TeraWulf and 7 mentions for Cleanspark. TeraWulf's average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat Cleanspark's score of -0.07 indicating that TeraWulf is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
TeraWulf	6 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Cleanspark	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

62.5% of TeraWulf shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.1% of Cleanspark shares are held by institutional investors. 15.9% of TeraWulf shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Cleanspark shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

TeraWulf beats Cleanspark on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TeraWulf compare to Hut 8?

TeraWulf (NASDAQ:WULF) and Hut 8 (NASDAQ:HUT) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk and institutional ownership.

Hut 8 has a net margin of -109.77% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -611.46%. Hut 8's return on equity of -0.35% beat TeraWulf's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
TeraWulf	-611.46%	-305.07%	-8.42%
Hut 8	-109.77%	-0.35%	-0.22%

TeraWulf presently has a consensus price target of $31.72, indicating a potential upside of 21.24%. Hut 8 has a consensus price target of $107.72, indicating a potential downside of 17.95%. Given TeraWulf's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe TeraWulf is more favorable than Hut 8.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
TeraWulf	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	14 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88
Hut 8	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	17 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.89

62.5% of TeraWulf shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.8% of Hut 8 shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.9% of TeraWulf shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 10.4% of Hut 8 shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

TeraWulf has a beta of 3.82, meaning that its stock price is 282% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hut 8 has a beta of 4.61, meaning that its stock price is 361% more volatile than the broader market.

Hut 8 has higher revenue and earnings than TeraWulf. Hut 8 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TeraWulf, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
TeraWulf	$168.46M	76.95	-$661.42M	-$2.48	N/A
Hut 8	$235.12M	62.87	-$226.15M	-$3.00	N/A

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 6 more articles in the media than Hut 8. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for TeraWulf and 12 mentions for Hut 8. Hut 8's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat TeraWulf's score of 0.51 indicating that Hut 8 is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
TeraWulf	6 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Hut 8	5 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Hut 8 beats TeraWulf on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TeraWulf compare to Marathon Digital?

Marathon Digital (NASDAQ:MARA) and TeraWulf (NASDAQ:WULF) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

Marathon Digital presently has a consensus target price of $18.38, indicating a potential upside of 31.63%. TeraWulf has a consensus target price of $31.72, indicating a potential upside of 21.24%. Given Marathon Digital's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Marathon Digital is more favorable than TeraWulf.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Marathon Digital	2 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.45
TeraWulf	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	14 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88

Marathon Digital has a beta of 5.38, suggesting that its share price is 438% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TeraWulf has a beta of 3.82, suggesting that its share price is 282% more volatile than the broader market.

TeraWulf has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Marathon Digital. TeraWulf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marathon Digital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Marathon Digital	$907.09M	5.87	-$1.31B	-$5.72	N/A
TeraWulf	$168.46M	76.95	-$661.42M	-$2.48	N/A

Marathon Digital has a net margin of -234.83% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -611.46%. Marathon Digital's return on equity of -23.20% beat TeraWulf's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Marathon Digital	-234.83%	-23.20%	-12.51%
TeraWulf	-611.46%	-305.07%	-8.42%

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 4 more articles in the media than Marathon Digital. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for TeraWulf and 14 mentions for Marathon Digital. Marathon Digital's average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat TeraWulf's score of 0.51 indicating that Marathon Digital is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Marathon Digital	3 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
TeraWulf	6 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

44.5% of Marathon Digital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.5% of TeraWulf shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Marathon Digital shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 15.9% of TeraWulf shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

TeraWulf beats Marathon Digital on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TeraWulf compare to Riot Platforms?

Riot Platforms (NASDAQ:RIOT) and TeraWulf (NASDAQ:WULF) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, dividends, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Riot Platforms has a beta of 3.84, meaning that its stock price is 284% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TeraWulf has a beta of 3.82, meaning that its stock price is 282% more volatile than the broader market.

Riot Platforms has a net margin of -132.76% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -611.46%. Riot Platforms' return on equity of -28.78% beat TeraWulf's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Riot Platforms	-132.76%	-28.78%	-21.50%
TeraWulf	-611.46%	-305.07%	-8.42%

TeraWulf has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Riot Platforms. TeraWulf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Riot Platforms, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Riot Platforms	$647.43M	16.15	-$663.18M	-$2.64	N/A
TeraWulf	$168.46M	76.95	-$661.42M	-$2.48	N/A

Riot Platforms currently has a consensus target price of $24.70, suggesting a potential downside of 10.67%. TeraWulf has a consensus target price of $31.72, suggesting a potential upside of 21.24%. Given TeraWulf's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe TeraWulf is more favorable than Riot Platforms.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Riot Platforms	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	17 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.91
TeraWulf	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	14 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88

40.3% of Riot Platforms shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.5% of TeraWulf shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.9% of Riot Platforms shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.9% of TeraWulf shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 10 more articles in the media than Riot Platforms. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for TeraWulf and 8 mentions for Riot Platforms. TeraWulf's average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat Riot Platforms' score of -0.22 indicating that TeraWulf is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Riot Platforms	0 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
TeraWulf	6 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

TeraWulf beats Riot Platforms on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get TeraWulf News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding WULF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

WULF vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	TeraWulf	FIN Industry	Finance Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$13.13B	$7.07B	$13.57B	$12.54B
Dividend Yield	N/A	5.83%	5.76%	5.22%
P/E Ratio	-10.55	17.57	19.70	24.18
Price / Sales	76.95	11.51	141.24	112.26
Price / Cash	N/A	64.51	19.87	57.13
Price / Book	76.94	3.40	2.17	6.72
Net Income	-$661.42M	$306.51M	$1.13B	$337.19M
7 Day Performance	-2.17%	-0.30%	-0.69%	0.48%
1 Month Performance	22.76%	-1.16%	-0.44%	5.07%
1 Year Performance	592.06%	15.63%	11.16%	34.25%

TeraWulf Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
WULF TeraWulf	3.6687 of 5 stars	$26.16 -1.2%	$31.72 +21.2%	+633.8%	$13.13B	$168.46M	N/A	6	Analyst Forecast Gap Up
BTBT Bit Digital	3.0289 of 5 stars	$2.11 +4.5%	$5.67 +168.6%	-16.8%	$705.36M	$113.56M	N/A	10
CLSK Cleanspark	2.6506 of 5 stars	$18.81 +2.8%	$20.44 +8.7%	+104.2%	$4.69B	$766.31M	N/A	130	Gap Up
HUT Hut 8	2.0886 of 5 stars	$132.38 +6.0%	$107.72 -18.6%	+774.6%	$14.06B	$235.12M	N/A	219
MARA Marathon Digital	3.305 of 5 stars	$14.85 +3.3%	$18.38 +23.7%	-0.6%	$5.48B	$867.82M	N/A	9	Analyst Forecast Gap Down

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:WULF) was last updated on 6/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

TeraWulf (WULF) Competitors

WULF vs. BTBT, CLSK, HUT, MARA, and RIOT

How does TeraWulf compare to Bit Digital?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to Cleanspark?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to Hut 8?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to Marathon Digital?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to Riot Platforms?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

WULF vs. The Competition

TeraWulf Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

TeraWulf (WULF) Competitors

WULF vs. BTBT, CLSK, HUT, MARA, and RIOT

How does TeraWulf compare to Bit Digital?

Do analysts rate WULF or BTBT?

Does the media favor WULF or BTBT?

Is WULF or BTBT more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in WULF or BTBT?

Which has better earnings & valuation, WULF or BTBT?

Which has more risk & volatility, WULF or BTBT?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to Cleanspark?

Is WULF or CLSK more profitable?

Do analysts rate WULF or CLSK?

Which has more volatility & risk, WULF or CLSK?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, WULF or CLSK?

Does the media prefer WULF or CLSK?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of WULF or CLSK?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to Hut 8?

Is WULF or HUT more profitable?

Do analysts recommend WULF or HUT?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in WULF or HUT?

Which has more volatility and risk, WULF or HUT?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, WULF or HUT?

Does the media prefer WULF or HUT?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to Marathon Digital?

Do analysts rate MARA or WULF?

Which has more volatility & risk, MARA or WULF?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, MARA or WULF?

Is MARA or WULF more profitable?

Does the media favor MARA or WULF?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in MARA or WULF?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to Riot Platforms?

Which has more risk & volatility, RIOT or WULF?

Is RIOT or WULF more profitable?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, RIOT or WULF?

Do analysts recommend RIOT or WULF?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of RIOT or WULF?

Does the media favor RIOT or WULF?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

WULF vs. The Competition

TeraWulf Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools