Which has stronger earnings and valuation, WULF or BTBT?

Bit Digital has lower revenue, but higher earnings than TeraWulf. TeraWulf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bit Digital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio TeraWulf $168.46M 51.80 -$661.42M -$4.37 N/A Bit Digital $113.56M 4.20 -$80.32M -$0.68 N/A

Is WULF or BTBT more profitable?

Bit Digital has a net margin of -145.39% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -1,179.94%. Bit Digital's return on equity of -8.44% beat TeraWulf's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets TeraWulf -1,179.94% -512.60% -9.63% Bit Digital -145.39% -8.44% -6.24%

Does the media prefer WULF or BTBT?

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 19 more articles in the media than Bit Digital. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for TeraWulf and 5 mentions for Bit Digital. TeraWulf's average media sentiment score of 0.25 beat Bit Digital's score of 0.20 indicating that TeraWulf is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment TeraWulf 6 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 9 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Bit Digital 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has higher earnings and valuation, CIFR or WULF?

TeraWulf has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cipher Mining. Cipher Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TeraWulf, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Cipher Mining $223.94M 33.75 -$822.24M -$2.86 N/A TeraWulf $168.46M 51.80 -$661.42M -$4.37 N/A

Is CIFR or WULF more profitable?

Cipher Mining has a net margin of -585.75% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -1,179.94%. Cipher Mining's return on equity of -156.28% beat TeraWulf's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Cipher Mining -585.75% -156.28% -21.29% TeraWulf -1,179.94% -512.60% -9.63%

Does the media refer more to CIFR or WULF?

In the previous week, Cipher Mining had 5 more articles in the media than TeraWulf. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for Cipher Mining and 24 mentions for TeraWulf. TeraWulf's average media sentiment score of 0.25 beat Cipher Mining's score of 0.14 indicating that TeraWulf is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Cipher Mining 5 Very Positive mention(s) 4 Positive mention(s) 12 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral TeraWulf 6 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 9 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has better earnings & valuation, WULF or CLSK?

Cleanspark has higher revenue and earnings than TeraWulf. Cleanspark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TeraWulf, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio TeraWulf $168.46M 51.80 -$661.42M -$4.37 N/A Cleanspark $766.31M 4.27 $364.46M -$2.10 N/A

Is WULF or CLSK more profitable?

Cleanspark has a net margin of -67.66% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -1,179.94%. Cleanspark's return on equity of 7.07% beat TeraWulf's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets TeraWulf -1,179.94% -512.60% -9.63% Cleanspark -67.66% 7.07% 3.77%

Does the media prefer WULF or CLSK?

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 12 more articles in the media than Cleanspark. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for TeraWulf and 12 mentions for Cleanspark. TeraWulf's average media sentiment score of 0.25 beat Cleanspark's score of 0.15 indicating that TeraWulf is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment TeraWulf 6 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 9 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Cleanspark 4 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media prefer HIVE or WULF?

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 19 more articles in the media than HIVE Digital Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for TeraWulf and 5 mentions for HIVE Digital Technologies. HIVE Digital Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat TeraWulf's score of 0.25 indicating that HIVE Digital Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment HIVE Digital Technologies 4 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive TeraWulf 6 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 9 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has better valuation & earnings, WULF or HUT?

Hut 8 has higher revenue and earnings than TeraWulf. Hut 8 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TeraWulf, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio TeraWulf $168.46M 51.80 -$661.42M -$4.37 N/A Hut 8 $235.12M 47.52 -$226.15M -$5.45 N/A

Is WULF or HUT more profitable?

Hut 8 has a net margin of -188.59% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -1,179.94%. Hut 8's return on equity of -0.97% beat TeraWulf's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets TeraWulf -1,179.94% -512.60% -9.63% Hut 8 -188.59% -0.97% -0.36%

Does the media prefer WULF or HUT?

In the previous week, Hut 8 had 23 more articles in the media than TeraWulf. MarketBeat recorded 47 mentions for Hut 8 and 24 mentions for TeraWulf. TeraWulf's average media sentiment score of 0.25 beat Hut 8's score of 0.07 indicating that TeraWulf is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment TeraWulf 6 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 9 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Hut 8 9 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 10 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 5 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

TeraWulf (WULF) Competitors

$17.61 -0.46 (-2.55%)

Closing price 08/6/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$18.04 +0.43 (+2.43%)

As of 06:50 AM Eastern

Compare

WULF vs. BTBT, CIFR, CLSK, HIVE, and HUT

Should you buy TeraWulf stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares TeraWulf with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with TeraWulf include Bit Digital (BTBT), Cipher Mining (CIFR), Cleanspark (CLSK), HIVE Digital Technologies (HIVE), and Hut 8 (HUT). These companies are all part of the "technology" sector.

How does TeraWulf compare to Bit Digital?

TeraWulf (NASDAQ:WULF) and Bit Digital (NASDAQ:BTBT) are both technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, risk and dividends.

Bit Digital has a net margin of -145.39% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -1,179.94%. Bit Digital's return on equity of -8.44% beat TeraWulf's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
TeraWulf	-1,179.94%	-512.60%	-9.63%
Bit Digital	-145.39%	-8.44%	-6.24%

62.5% of TeraWulf shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.7% of Bit Digital shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.9% of TeraWulf shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Bit Digital shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 19 more articles in the media than Bit Digital. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for TeraWulf and 5 mentions for Bit Digital. TeraWulf's average media sentiment score of 0.25 beat Bit Digital's score of 0.20 indicating that TeraWulf is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
TeraWulf	6 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	9 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Bit Digital	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

TeraWulf currently has a consensus price target of $34.74, suggesting a potential upside of 97.25%. Bit Digital has a consensus price target of $5.13, suggesting a potential upside of 275.46%. Given Bit Digital's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Bit Digital is more favorable than TeraWulf.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
TeraWulf	2 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	15 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.85
Bit Digital	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40

Bit Digital has lower revenue, but higher earnings than TeraWulf. TeraWulf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bit Digital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
TeraWulf	$168.46M	51.80	-$661.42M	-$4.37	N/A
Bit Digital	$113.56M	4.20	-$80.32M	-$0.68	N/A

TeraWulf has a beta of 3.76, indicating that its share price is 276% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bit Digital has a beta of 4.02, indicating that its share price is 302% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

TeraWulf beats Bit Digital on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TeraWulf compare to Cipher Mining?

Cipher Mining (NASDAQ:CIFR) and TeraWulf (NASDAQ:WULF) are both mid-cap technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, profitability, media sentiment and valuation.

Cipher Mining currently has a consensus target price of $28.29, indicating a potential upside of 55.38%. TeraWulf has a consensus target price of $34.74, indicating a potential upside of 97.25%. Given TeraWulf's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe TeraWulf is more favorable than Cipher Mining.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cipher Mining	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	16 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.89
TeraWulf	2 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	15 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.85

TeraWulf has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cipher Mining. Cipher Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TeraWulf, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cipher Mining	$223.94M	33.75	-$822.24M	-$2.86	N/A
TeraWulf	$168.46M	51.80	-$661.42M	-$4.37	N/A

Cipher Mining has a beta of 3.2, indicating that its share price is 220% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TeraWulf has a beta of 3.76, indicating that its share price is 276% more volatile than the broader market.

Cipher Mining has a net margin of -585.75% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -1,179.94%. Cipher Mining's return on equity of -156.28% beat TeraWulf's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cipher Mining	-585.75%	-156.28%	-21.29%
TeraWulf	-1,179.94%	-512.60%	-9.63%

In the previous week, Cipher Mining had 5 more articles in the media than TeraWulf. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for Cipher Mining and 24 mentions for TeraWulf. TeraWulf's average media sentiment score of 0.25 beat Cipher Mining's score of 0.14 indicating that TeraWulf is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cipher Mining	5 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	12 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
TeraWulf	6 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	9 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

12.3% of Cipher Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.5% of TeraWulf shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.1% of Cipher Mining shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.9% of TeraWulf shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

TeraWulf beats Cipher Mining on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TeraWulf compare to Cleanspark?

TeraWulf (NASDAQ:WULF) and Cleanspark (NASDAQ:CLSK) are both mid-cap technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Cleanspark has higher revenue and earnings than TeraWulf. Cleanspark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TeraWulf, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
TeraWulf	$168.46M	51.80	-$661.42M	-$4.37	N/A
Cleanspark	$766.31M	4.27	$364.46M	-$2.10	N/A

Cleanspark has a net margin of -67.66% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -1,179.94%. Cleanspark's return on equity of 7.07% beat TeraWulf's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
TeraWulf	-1,179.94%	-512.60%	-9.63%
Cleanspark	-67.66%	7.07%	3.77%

TeraWulf has a beta of 3.76, meaning that its share price is 276% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cleanspark has a beta of 3.86, meaning that its share price is 286% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 12 more articles in the media than Cleanspark. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for TeraWulf and 12 mentions for Cleanspark. TeraWulf's average media sentiment score of 0.25 beat Cleanspark's score of 0.15 indicating that TeraWulf is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
TeraWulf	6 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	9 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Cleanspark	4 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

62.5% of TeraWulf shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.1% of Cleanspark shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.9% of TeraWulf shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Cleanspark shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

TeraWulf presently has a consensus price target of $34.74, suggesting a potential upside of 97.25%. Cleanspark has a consensus price target of $23.88, suggesting a potential upside of 87.33%. Given TeraWulf's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe TeraWulf is more favorable than Cleanspark.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
TeraWulf	2 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	15 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.85
Cleanspark	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88

Summary

TeraWulf beats Cleanspark on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TeraWulf compare to HIVE Digital Technologies?

HIVE Digital Technologies (NASDAQ:HIVE) and TeraWulf (NASDAQ:WULF) are both technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and risk.

HIVE Digital Technologies presently has a consensus price target of $6.95, suggesting a potential upside of 151.98%. TeraWulf has a consensus price target of $34.74, suggesting a potential upside of 97.25%. Given HIVE Digital Technologies' higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe HIVE Digital Technologies is more favorable than TeraWulf.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
HIVE Digital Technologies	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.60
TeraWulf	2 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	15 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.85

24.4% of HIVE Digital Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.5% of TeraWulf shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.4% of HIVE Digital Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.9% of TeraWulf shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

HIVE Digital Technologies has a net margin of -49.21% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -1,179.94%. HIVE Digital Technologies' return on equity of -23.12% beat TeraWulf's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
HIVE Digital Technologies	-49.21%	-23.12%	-20.33%
TeraWulf	-1,179.94%	-512.60%	-9.63%

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 19 more articles in the media than HIVE Digital Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for TeraWulf and 5 mentions for HIVE Digital Technologies. HIVE Digital Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat TeraWulf's score of 0.25 indicating that HIVE Digital Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
HIVE Digital Technologies	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
TeraWulf	6 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	9 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

HIVE Digital Technologies has a beta of 3.78, suggesting that its stock price is 278% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TeraWulf has a beta of 3.76, suggesting that its stock price is 276% more volatile than the broader market.

HIVE Digital Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than TeraWulf. HIVE Digital Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TeraWulf, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
HIVE Digital Technologies	$297.79M	2.49	-$148.45M	-$0.56	N/A
TeraWulf	$168.46M	51.80	-$661.42M	-$4.37	N/A

Summary

TeraWulf beats HIVE Digital Technologies on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TeraWulf compare to Hut 8?

TeraWulf (NASDAQ:WULF) and Hut 8 (NASDAQ:HUT) are both technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Hut 8 had 23 more articles in the media than TeraWulf. MarketBeat recorded 47 mentions for Hut 8 and 24 mentions for TeraWulf. TeraWulf's average media sentiment score of 0.25 beat Hut 8's score of 0.07 indicating that TeraWulf is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
TeraWulf	6 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	9 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Hut 8	9 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	10 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	5 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

TeraWulf currently has a consensus price target of $34.74, suggesting a potential upside of 97.25%. Hut 8 has a consensus price target of $139.15, suggesting a potential upside of 53.50%. Given TeraWulf's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe TeraWulf is more favorable than Hut 8.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
TeraWulf	2 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	15 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.85
Hut 8	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	17 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Hut 8 has higher revenue and earnings than TeraWulf. Hut 8 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TeraWulf, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
TeraWulf	$168.46M	51.80	-$661.42M	-$4.37	N/A
Hut 8	$235.12M	47.52	-$226.15M	-$5.45	N/A

TeraWulf has a beta of 3.76, suggesting that its share price is 276% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hut 8 has a beta of 4.64, suggesting that its share price is 364% more volatile than the broader market.

62.5% of TeraWulf shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.8% of Hut 8 shares are held by institutional investors. 15.9% of TeraWulf shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 10.4% of Hut 8 shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Hut 8 has a net margin of -188.59% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -1,179.94%. Hut 8's return on equity of -0.97% beat TeraWulf's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
TeraWulf	-1,179.94%	-512.60%	-9.63%
Hut 8	-188.59%	-0.97%	-0.36%

Summary

Hut 8 beats TeraWulf on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get TeraWulf News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding WULF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

WULF vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	TeraWulf	Software Industry	Technology Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$8.95B	$15.40B	$29.68B	$12.87B
Dividend Yield	N/A	3.43%	2.73%	9.93%
P/E Ratio	-4.03	134.12	78.85	25.30
Price / Sales	51.80	1,296.29	597.37	106.23
Price / Cash	N/A	45.43	50.08	50.37
Price / Book	51.79	6.64	9.16	6.13
Net Income	-$661.42M	$436.18M	$660.31M	$342.95M
7 Day Performance	-0.28%	2.40%	3.42%	3.19%
1 Month Performance	-12.99%	-0.06%	-0.71%	-1.98%
1 Year Performance	256.48%	7.32%	175.33%	21.11%

TeraWulf Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
WULF TeraWulf	3.9761 of 5 stars	$17.61 -2.5%	$34.74 +97.3%	+241.9%	$8.95B	$168.46M	N/A	6	Trending News Earnings Report Analyst Forecast Analyst Revision Gap Down
BTBT Bit Digital	3.1091 of 5 stars	$1.38 +5.3%	$5.13 +271.4%	-60.3%	$457.44M	$113.56M	N/A	10	News Coverage Upcoming Earnings
CIFR Cipher Mining	3.2251 of 5 stars	$24.16 +8.2%	$28.74 +18.9%	+249.5%	$9.13B	$223.94M	N/A	10	Trending News Earnings Report Analyst Forecast Options Volume Gap Down
CLSK Cleanspark	3.5919 of 5 stars	$14.65 +6.5%	$23.88 +63.0%	+15.9%	$3.53B	$766.31M	N/A	130	Gap Down
HIVE HIVE Digital Technologies	3.1241 of 5 stars	$2.89 +2.1%	$6.95 +140.6%	+30.2%	$760.22M	$297.79M	N/A	20	News Coverage Upcoming Earnings

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:WULF) was last updated on 8/7/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

TeraWulf (WULF) Competitors

WULF vs. BTBT, CIFR, CLSK, HIVE, and HUT

How does TeraWulf compare to Bit Digital?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to Cipher Mining?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to Cleanspark?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to HIVE Digital Technologies?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to Hut 8?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

WULF vs. The Competition

TeraWulf Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

TeraWulf (WULF) Competitors

WULF vs. BTBT, CIFR, CLSK, HIVE, and HUT

How does TeraWulf compare to Bit Digital?

Is WULF or BTBT more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of WULF or BTBT?

Does the media prefer WULF or BTBT?

Do analysts rate WULF or BTBT?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, WULF or BTBT?

Which has more volatility and risk, WULF or BTBT?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to Cipher Mining?

Do analysts rate CIFR or WULF?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, CIFR or WULF?

Which has more risk & volatility, CIFR or WULF?

Is CIFR or WULF more profitable?

Does the media refer more to CIFR or WULF?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in CIFR or WULF?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to Cleanspark?

Which has better earnings & valuation, WULF or CLSK?

Is WULF or CLSK more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, WULF or CLSK?

Does the media prefer WULF or CLSK?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of WULF or CLSK?

Do analysts recommend WULF or CLSK?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to HIVE Digital Technologies?

Do analysts prefer HIVE or WULF?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in HIVE or WULF?

Is HIVE or WULF more profitable?

Does the media prefer HIVE or WULF?

Which has more risk & volatility, HIVE or WULF?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, HIVE or WULF?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to Hut 8?

Does the media prefer WULF or HUT?

Do analysts prefer WULF or HUT?

Which has better valuation & earnings, WULF or HUT?

Which has more volatility and risk, WULF or HUT?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in WULF or HUT?

Is WULF or HUT more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

WULF vs. The Competition

TeraWulf Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools