Which has higher valuation & earnings, WULF or BTBT?

Bit Digital has lower revenue, but higher earnings than TeraWulf. TeraWulf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bit Digital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio TeraWulf $168.46M 84.66 -$661.42M -$2.48 N/A Bit Digital $116.38M 6.39 -$80.32M -$0.68 N/A

Is WULF or BTBT more profitable?

Bit Digital has a net margin of -145.39% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -611.46%. Bit Digital's return on equity of -8.44% beat TeraWulf's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets TeraWulf -611.46% -305.07% -8.42% Bit Digital -145.39% -8.44% -6.24%

Does the media prefer WULF or BTBT?

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 9 more articles in the media than Bit Digital. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for TeraWulf and 1 mentions for Bit Digital. TeraWulf's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Bit Digital's score of 0.67 indicating that TeraWulf is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment TeraWulf 4 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Bit Digital 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has higher valuation and earnings, WULF or CLSK?

Cleanspark has higher revenue and earnings than TeraWulf. TeraWulf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cleanspark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio TeraWulf $168.46M 84.66 -$661.42M -$2.48 N/A Cleanspark $766.31M 5.76 $364.46M -$2.10 N/A

Is WULF or CLSK more profitable?

Cleanspark has a net margin of -67.66% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -611.46%. Cleanspark's return on equity of 7.07% beat TeraWulf's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets TeraWulf -611.46% -305.07% -8.42% Cleanspark -67.66% 7.07% 3.77%

Does the media refer more to WULF or CLSK?

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 7 more articles in the media than Cleanspark. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for TeraWulf and 3 mentions for Cleanspark. Cleanspark's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat TeraWulf's score of 0.69 indicating that Cleanspark is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment TeraWulf 4 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Cleanspark 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has higher valuation and earnings, HUT or WULF?

Hut 8 has higher revenue and earnings than TeraWulf. Hut 8 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TeraWulf, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Hut 8 $235.12M 57.71 -$226.15M -$3.00 N/A TeraWulf $168.46M 84.66 -$661.42M -$2.48 N/A

Is HUT or WULF more profitable?

Hut 8 has a net margin of -109.77% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -611.46%. Hut 8's return on equity of -0.35% beat TeraWulf's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Hut 8 -109.77% -0.35% -0.22% TeraWulf -611.46% -305.07% -8.42%

Does the media prefer HUT or WULF?

In the previous week, Hut 8 had 6 more articles in the media than TeraWulf. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Hut 8 and 10 mentions for TeraWulf. Hut 8's average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat TeraWulf's score of 0.69 indicating that Hut 8 is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Hut 8 13 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive TeraWulf 4 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor MARA or WULF?

In the previous week, Marathon Digital had 1 more articles in the media than TeraWulf. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Marathon Digital and 10 mentions for TeraWulf. TeraWulf's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Marathon Digital's score of 0.09 indicating that TeraWulf is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Marathon Digital 3 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral TeraWulf 4 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has higher valuation & earnings, RIOT or WULF?

TeraWulf has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Riot Platforms. TeraWulf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Riot Platforms, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Riot Platforms $647.43M 16.76 -$663.18M -$2.64 N/A TeraWulf $168.46M 84.66 -$661.42M -$2.48 N/A

Is RIOT or WULF more profitable?

Riot Platforms has a net margin of -132.76% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -611.46%. Riot Platforms' return on equity of -28.78% beat TeraWulf's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Riot Platforms -132.76% -28.78% -21.50% TeraWulf -611.46% -305.07% -8.42%

Does the media favor RIOT or WULF?

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 9 more articles in the media than Riot Platforms. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for TeraWulf and 1 mentions for Riot Platforms. TeraWulf's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Riot Platforms' score of 0.20 indicating that TeraWulf is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Riot Platforms 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral TeraWulf 4 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

TeraWulf (WULF) Competitors

$28.78 +0.47 (+1.66%)

Closing price 06/23/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$29.01 +0.23 (+0.80%)

As of 05:00 AM Eastern

Compare

WULF vs. BTBT, CLSK, HUT, MARA, and RIOT

Should you buy TeraWulf stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares TeraWulf with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with TeraWulf include Bit Digital (BTBT), Cleanspark (CLSK), Hut 8 (HUT), Marathon Digital (MARA), and Riot Platforms (RIOT).

How does TeraWulf compare to Bit Digital?

TeraWulf (NASDAQ:WULF) and Bit Digital (NASDAQ:BTBT) are both banking companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, profitability, media sentiment, valuation and institutional ownership.

TeraWulf presently has a consensus target price of $31.86, suggesting a potential upside of 10.70%. Bit Digital has a consensus target price of $5.67, suggesting a potential upside of 166.04%. Given Bit Digital's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Bit Digital is more favorable than TeraWulf.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
TeraWulf	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	14 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.94
Bit Digital	2 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 9 more articles in the media than Bit Digital. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for TeraWulf and 1 mentions for Bit Digital. TeraWulf's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Bit Digital's score of 0.67 indicating that TeraWulf is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
TeraWulf	4 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Bit Digital	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

TeraWulf has a beta of 3.82, suggesting that its stock price is 282% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bit Digital has a beta of 3.98, suggesting that its stock price is 298% more volatile than the broader market.

Bit Digital has a net margin of -145.39% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -611.46%. Bit Digital's return on equity of -8.44% beat TeraWulf's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
TeraWulf	-611.46%	-305.07%	-8.42%
Bit Digital	-145.39%	-8.44%	-6.24%

62.5% of TeraWulf shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.7% of Bit Digital shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.9% of TeraWulf shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Bit Digital shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Bit Digital has lower revenue, but higher earnings than TeraWulf. TeraWulf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bit Digital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
TeraWulf	$168.46M	84.66	-$661.42M	-$2.48	N/A
Bit Digital	$116.38M	6.39	-$80.32M	-$0.68	N/A

Summary

TeraWulf beats Bit Digital on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TeraWulf compare to Cleanspark?

TeraWulf (NASDAQ:WULF) and Cleanspark (NASDAQ:CLSK) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation and profitability.

Cleanspark has a net margin of -67.66% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -611.46%. Cleanspark's return on equity of 7.07% beat TeraWulf's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
TeraWulf	-611.46%	-305.07%	-8.42%
Cleanspark	-67.66%	7.07%	3.77%

TeraWulf presently has a consensus price target of $31.86, indicating a potential upside of 10.70%. Cleanspark has a consensus price target of $20.67, indicating a potential upside of 20.26%. Given Cleanspark's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Cleanspark is more favorable than TeraWulf.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
TeraWulf	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	14 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.94
Cleanspark	2 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80

TeraWulf has a beta of 3.82, meaning that its share price is 282% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cleanspark has a beta of 3.79, meaning that its share price is 279% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 7 more articles in the media than Cleanspark. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for TeraWulf and 3 mentions for Cleanspark. Cleanspark's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat TeraWulf's score of 0.69 indicating that Cleanspark is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
TeraWulf	4 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Cleanspark	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

62.5% of TeraWulf shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.1% of Cleanspark shares are held by institutional investors. 15.9% of TeraWulf shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Cleanspark shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Cleanspark has higher revenue and earnings than TeraWulf. TeraWulf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cleanspark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
TeraWulf	$168.46M	84.66	-$661.42M	-$2.48	N/A
Cleanspark	$766.31M	5.76	$364.46M	-$2.10	N/A

Summary

Cleanspark beats TeraWulf on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TeraWulf compare to Hut 8?

Hut 8 (NASDAQ:HUT) and TeraWulf (NASDAQ:WULF) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Hut 8 presently has a consensus target price of $113.95, suggesting a potential downside of 5.45%. TeraWulf has a consensus target price of $31.86, suggesting a potential upside of 10.70%. Given TeraWulf's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe TeraWulf is more favorable than Hut 8.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hut 8	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	17 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.89
TeraWulf	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	14 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.94

31.8% of Hut 8 shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.5% of TeraWulf shares are held by institutional investors. 10.4% of Hut 8 shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.9% of TeraWulf shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Hut 8 has a beta of 4.61, suggesting that its stock price is 361% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TeraWulf has a beta of 3.82, suggesting that its stock price is 282% more volatile than the broader market.

Hut 8 has higher revenue and earnings than TeraWulf. Hut 8 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TeraWulf, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hut 8	$235.12M	57.71	-$226.15M	-$3.00	N/A
TeraWulf	$168.46M	84.66	-$661.42M	-$2.48	N/A

Hut 8 has a net margin of -109.77% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -611.46%. Hut 8's return on equity of -0.35% beat TeraWulf's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hut 8	-109.77%	-0.35%	-0.22%
TeraWulf	-611.46%	-305.07%	-8.42%

In the previous week, Hut 8 had 6 more articles in the media than TeraWulf. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Hut 8 and 10 mentions for TeraWulf. Hut 8's average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat TeraWulf's score of 0.69 indicating that Hut 8 is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Hut 8	13 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
TeraWulf	4 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Hut 8 beats TeraWulf on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TeraWulf compare to Marathon Digital?

Marathon Digital (NASDAQ:MARA) and TeraWulf (NASDAQ:WULF) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

Marathon Digital has a beta of 5.38, suggesting that its share price is 438% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TeraWulf has a beta of 3.82, suggesting that its share price is 282% more volatile than the broader market.

Marathon Digital has a net margin of -234.83% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -611.46%. Marathon Digital's return on equity of -23.20% beat TeraWulf's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Marathon Digital	-234.83%	-23.20%	-12.51%
TeraWulf	-611.46%	-305.07%	-8.42%

44.5% of Marathon Digital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.5% of TeraWulf shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Marathon Digital shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 15.9% of TeraWulf shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Marathon Digital had 1 more articles in the media than TeraWulf. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Marathon Digital and 10 mentions for TeraWulf. TeraWulf's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Marathon Digital's score of 0.09 indicating that TeraWulf is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Marathon Digital	3 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
TeraWulf	4 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

TeraWulf has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Marathon Digital. TeraWulf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marathon Digital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Marathon Digital	$907.09M	6.18	-$1.31B	-$5.72	N/A
TeraWulf	$168.46M	84.66	-$661.42M	-$2.48	N/A

Marathon Digital currently has a consensus price target of $18.38, suggesting a potential upside of 25.00%. TeraWulf has a consensus price target of $31.86, suggesting a potential upside of 10.70%. Given Marathon Digital's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Marathon Digital is more favorable than TeraWulf.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Marathon Digital	2 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.45
TeraWulf	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	14 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.94

Summary

TeraWulf beats Marathon Digital on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TeraWulf compare to Riot Platforms?

Riot Platforms (NASDAQ:RIOT) and TeraWulf (NASDAQ:WULF) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, risk and media sentiment.

TeraWulf has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Riot Platforms. TeraWulf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Riot Platforms, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Riot Platforms	$647.43M	16.76	-$663.18M	-$2.64	N/A
TeraWulf	$168.46M	84.66	-$661.42M	-$2.48	N/A

Riot Platforms has a beta of 3.84, meaning that its stock price is 284% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TeraWulf has a beta of 3.82, meaning that its stock price is 282% more volatile than the broader market.

Riot Platforms currently has a consensus price target of $24.70, indicating a potential downside of 13.91%. TeraWulf has a consensus price target of $31.86, indicating a potential upside of 10.70%. Given TeraWulf's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe TeraWulf is more favorable than Riot Platforms.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Riot Platforms	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	17 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.91
TeraWulf	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	14 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.94

Riot Platforms has a net margin of -132.76% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -611.46%. Riot Platforms' return on equity of -28.78% beat TeraWulf's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Riot Platforms	-132.76%	-28.78%	-21.50%
TeraWulf	-611.46%	-305.07%	-8.42%

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 9 more articles in the media than Riot Platforms. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for TeraWulf and 1 mentions for Riot Platforms. TeraWulf's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Riot Platforms' score of 0.20 indicating that TeraWulf is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Riot Platforms	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
TeraWulf	4 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

40.3% of Riot Platforms shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.5% of TeraWulf shares are held by institutional investors. 7.8% of Riot Platforms shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.9% of TeraWulf shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

TeraWulf beats Riot Platforms on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get TeraWulf News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding WULF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

WULF vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	TeraWulf	FIN Industry	Finance Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$14.03B	$7.20B	$14.00B	$12.38B
Dividend Yield	N/A	5.36%	5.76%	5.83%
P/E Ratio	-11.60	17.73	20.23	23.99
Price / Sales	84.66	11.46	145.24	106.82
Price / Cash	N/A	55.76	19.52	54.51
Price / Book	84.65	3.50	2.25	6.50
Net Income	-$661.42M	$303.39M	$1.14B	$336.88M
7 Day Performance	3.30%	-0.86%	0.59%	-0.14%
1 Month Performance	26.12%	-0.42%	1.14%	0.77%
1 Year Performance	649.48%	10.82%	14.61%	28.49%

TeraWulf Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
WULF TeraWulf	2.5859 of 5 stars	$28.78 +1.7%	$31.86 +10.7%	+706.2%	$14.03B	$168.46M	N/A	6	Gap Down
BTBT Bit Digital	3.5906 of 5 stars	$1.93 +10.9%	$5.67 +193.6%	-8.2%	$607.59M	$113.56M	N/A	10	Gap Down
CLSK Cleanspark	3.1228 of 5 stars	$17.14 +4.0%	$20.67 +20.6%	+94.2%	$4.23B	$766.31M	N/A	130	Gap Down
HUT Hut 8	1.7618 of 5 stars	$120.18 +1.1%	$107.72 -10.4%	+658.4%	$13.38B	$235.12M	N/A	219	Analyst Forecast Gap Up
MARA Marathon Digital	3.2143 of 5 stars	$14.64 +4.0%	$18.38 +25.5%	+3.7%	$5.37B	$907.09M	N/A	9	Trending News Insider Trade Gap Down

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:WULF) was last updated on 6/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

TeraWulf (WULF) Competitors

WULF vs. BTBT, CLSK, HUT, MARA, and RIOT

How does TeraWulf compare to Bit Digital?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to Cleanspark?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to Hut 8?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to Marathon Digital?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to Riot Platforms?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

WULF vs. The Competition

TeraWulf Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

TeraWulf (WULF) Competitors

WULF vs. BTBT, CLSK, HUT, MARA, and RIOT

How does TeraWulf compare to Bit Digital?

Do analysts rate WULF or BTBT?

Does the media prefer WULF or BTBT?

Which has more volatility and risk, WULF or BTBT?

Is WULF or BTBT more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of WULF or BTBT?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, WULF or BTBT?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to Cleanspark?

Is WULF or CLSK more profitable?

Do analysts rate WULF or CLSK?

Which has more risk and volatility, WULF or CLSK?

Does the media refer more to WULF or CLSK?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of WULF or CLSK?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, WULF or CLSK?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to Hut 8?

Do analysts prefer HUT or WULF?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in HUT or WULF?

Which has more risk & volatility, HUT or WULF?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, HUT or WULF?

Is HUT or WULF more profitable?

Does the media prefer HUT or WULF?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to Marathon Digital?

Which has more volatility & risk, MARA or WULF?

Is MARA or WULF more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in MARA or WULF?

Does the media favor MARA or WULF?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, MARA or WULF?

Do analysts prefer MARA or WULF?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to Riot Platforms?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, RIOT or WULF?

Which has more risk & volatility, RIOT or WULF?

Do analysts prefer RIOT or WULF?

Is RIOT or WULF more profitable?

Does the media favor RIOT or WULF?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in RIOT or WULF?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

WULF vs. The Competition

TeraWulf Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools