Which has preferable valuation & earnings, WULF or BTBT?

Bit Digital has lower revenue, but higher earnings than TeraWulf. TeraWulf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bit Digital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio TeraWulf $168.46M 49.58 -$661.42M -$4.37 N/A Bit Digital $113.56M 5.05 -$80.32M -$1.06 N/A

Is WULF or BTBT more profitable?

Bit Digital has a net margin of -237.19% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -1,179.94%. Bit Digital's return on equity of -10.66% beat TeraWulf's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets TeraWulf -1,179.94% -458.62% -8.54% Bit Digital -237.19% -10.66% -6.81%

Does the media prefer WULF or BTBT?

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 2 more articles in the media than Bit Digital. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for TeraWulf and 16 mentions for Bit Digital. Bit Digital's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat TeraWulf's score of 0.89 indicating that Bit Digital is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment TeraWulf 10 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Bit Digital 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, WULF or CIFR?

TeraWulf has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Cipher Mining. Cipher Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TeraWulf, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio TeraWulf $168.46M 49.58 -$661.42M -$4.37 N/A Cipher Mining $223.94M 31.23 -$822.24M -$2.86 N/A

Is WULF or CIFR more profitable?

Cipher Mining has a net margin of -585.75% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -1,179.94%. Cipher Mining's return on equity of -156.28% beat TeraWulf's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets TeraWulf -1,179.94% -458.62% -8.54% Cipher Mining -585.75% -156.28% -21.29%

Does the media prefer WULF or CIFR?

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 1 more articles in the media than Cipher Mining. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for TeraWulf and 17 mentions for Cipher Mining. TeraWulf's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Cipher Mining's score of 0.80 indicating that TeraWulf is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment TeraWulf 10 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Cipher Mining 6 Very Positive mention(s) 4 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has better valuation and earnings, CLSK or WULF?

Cleanspark has higher revenue and earnings than TeraWulf. TeraWulf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cleanspark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Cleanspark $766.31M 4.58 $364.46M -$3.77 N/A TeraWulf $168.46M 49.58 -$661.42M -$4.37 N/A

Is CLSK or WULF more profitable?

Cleanspark has a net margin of -146.90% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -1,179.94%. Cleanspark's return on equity of -18.63% beat TeraWulf's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Cleanspark -146.90% -18.63% -8.15% TeraWulf -1,179.94% -458.62% -8.54%

Does the media prefer CLSK or WULF?

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 6 more articles in the media than Cleanspark. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for TeraWulf and 12 mentions for Cleanspark. TeraWulf's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Cleanspark's score of 0.35 indicating that TeraWulf is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Cleanspark 4 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral TeraWulf 10 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor HIVE or WULF?

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 11 more articles in the media than HIVE Digital Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for TeraWulf and 7 mentions for HIVE Digital Technologies. TeraWulf's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat HIVE Digital Technologies' score of 0.59 indicating that TeraWulf is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment HIVE Digital Technologies 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive TeraWulf 10 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has better earnings and valuation, WULF or HUT?

Hut 8 has higher revenue and earnings than TeraWulf. Hut 8 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TeraWulf, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio TeraWulf $168.46M 49.58 -$661.42M -$4.37 N/A Hut 8 $235.12M 51.69 -$226.15M -$5.45 N/A

Is WULF or HUT more profitable?

Hut 8 has a net margin of -188.59% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -1,179.94%. Hut 8's return on equity of -0.97% beat TeraWulf's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets TeraWulf -1,179.94% -458.62% -8.54% Hut 8 -188.59% -0.97% -0.36%

Does the media refer more to WULF or HUT?

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 2 more articles in the media than Hut 8. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for TeraWulf and 16 mentions for Hut 8. Hut 8's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat TeraWulf's score of 0.89 indicating that Hut 8 is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment TeraWulf 10 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Hut 8 10 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

TeraWulf (WULF) Competitors

$16.74 +0.60 (+3.72%)

Closing price 09/11/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$16.76 +0.03 (+0.15%)

As of 09/11/2026 07:59 PM Eastern

Compare

WULF vs. BTBT, CIFR, CLSK, HIVE, and HUT

Should you buy TeraWulf stock or one of its competitors? TeraWulf's main competitors and comparable companies include Bit Digital (BTBT), Cipher Mining (CIFR), Cleanspark (CLSK), HIVE Digital Technologies (HIVE), and Hut 8 (HUT). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "technology" sector.

How does TeraWulf compare to Bit Digital?

TeraWulf (NASDAQ:WULF) and Bit Digital (NASDAQ:BTBT) are both technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership and risk.

Bit Digital has lower revenue, but higher earnings than TeraWulf. TeraWulf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bit Digital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
TeraWulf	$168.46M	49.58	-$661.42M	-$4.37	N/A
Bit Digital	$113.56M	5.05	-$80.32M	-$1.06	N/A

Bit Digital has a net margin of -237.19% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -1,179.94%. Bit Digital's return on equity of -10.66% beat TeraWulf's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
TeraWulf	-1,179.94%	-458.62%	-8.54%
Bit Digital	-237.19%	-10.66%	-6.81%

TeraWulf has a beta of 3.7, meaning that its share price is 270% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bit Digital has a beta of 3.97, meaning that its share price is 297% more volatile than the broader market.

62.5% of TeraWulf shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.7% of Bit Digital shares are held by institutional investors. 15.9% of TeraWulf shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Bit Digital shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 2 more articles in the media than Bit Digital. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for TeraWulf and 16 mentions for Bit Digital. Bit Digital's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat TeraWulf's score of 0.89 indicating that Bit Digital is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
TeraWulf	10 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Bit Digital	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

TeraWulf currently has a consensus target price of $34.21, indicating a potential upside of 104.35%. Bit Digital has a consensus target price of $4.38, indicating a potential upside of 175.16%. Given Bit Digital's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Bit Digital is more favorable than TeraWulf.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
TeraWulf	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	16 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.95
Bit Digital	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40

Summary

TeraWulf and Bit Digital tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TeraWulf compare to Cipher Mining?

TeraWulf (NASDAQ:WULF) and Cipher Mining (NASDAQ:CIFR) are both mid-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends and risk.

62.5% of TeraWulf shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.3% of Cipher Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.9% of TeraWulf shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Cipher Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

TeraWulf currently has a consensus target price of $34.21, suggesting a potential upside of 104.35%. Cipher Mining has a consensus target price of $28.61, suggesting a potential upside of 69.80%. Given TeraWulf's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe TeraWulf is more favorable than Cipher Mining.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
TeraWulf	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	16 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.95
Cipher Mining	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	16 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.89

Cipher Mining has a net margin of -585.75% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -1,179.94%. Cipher Mining's return on equity of -156.28% beat TeraWulf's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
TeraWulf	-1,179.94%	-458.62%	-8.54%
Cipher Mining	-585.75%	-156.28%	-21.29%

TeraWulf has a beta of 3.7, meaning that its share price is 270% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cipher Mining has a beta of 3.15, meaning that its share price is 215% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 1 more articles in the media than Cipher Mining. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for TeraWulf and 17 mentions for Cipher Mining. TeraWulf's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Cipher Mining's score of 0.80 indicating that TeraWulf is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
TeraWulf	10 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Cipher Mining	6 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

TeraWulf has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Cipher Mining. Cipher Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TeraWulf, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
TeraWulf	$168.46M	49.58	-$661.42M	-$4.37	N/A
Cipher Mining	$223.94M	31.23	-$822.24M	-$2.86	N/A

Summary

TeraWulf beats Cipher Mining on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TeraWulf compare to Cleanspark?

Cleanspark (NASDAQ:CLSK) and TeraWulf (NASDAQ:WULF) are both mid-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, risk and institutional ownership.

Cleanspark has a net margin of -146.90% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -1,179.94%. Cleanspark's return on equity of -18.63% beat TeraWulf's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cleanspark	-146.90%	-18.63%	-8.15%
TeraWulf	-1,179.94%	-458.62%	-8.54%

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 6 more articles in the media than Cleanspark. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for TeraWulf and 12 mentions for Cleanspark. TeraWulf's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Cleanspark's score of 0.35 indicating that TeraWulf is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cleanspark	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
TeraWulf	10 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Cleanspark has higher revenue and earnings than TeraWulf. TeraWulf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cleanspark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cleanspark	$766.31M	4.58	$364.46M	-$3.77	N/A
TeraWulf	$168.46M	49.58	-$661.42M	-$4.37	N/A

Cleanspark currently has a consensus target price of $23.88, indicating a potential upside of 74.72%. TeraWulf has a consensus target price of $34.21, indicating a potential upside of 104.35%. Given TeraWulf's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe TeraWulf is more favorable than Cleanspark.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cleanspark	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88
TeraWulf	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	16 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.95

Cleanspark has a beta of 3.84, meaning that its stock price is 284% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TeraWulf has a beta of 3.7, meaning that its stock price is 270% more volatile than the broader market.

43.1% of Cleanspark shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.5% of TeraWulf shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of Cleanspark shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.9% of TeraWulf shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

TeraWulf beats Cleanspark on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TeraWulf compare to HIVE Digital Technologies?

HIVE Digital Technologies (NASDAQ:HIVE) and TeraWulf (NASDAQ:WULF) are both technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings and risk.

HIVE Digital Technologies currently has a consensus price target of $6.95, suggesting a potential upside of 129.37%. TeraWulf has a consensus price target of $34.21, suggesting a potential upside of 104.35%. Given HIVE Digital Technologies' higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe HIVE Digital Technologies is more favorable than TeraWulf.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
HIVE Digital Technologies	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63
TeraWulf	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	16 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.95

24.4% of HIVE Digital Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.5% of TeraWulf shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.4% of HIVE Digital Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.9% of TeraWulf shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

HIVE Digital Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than TeraWulf. TeraWulf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HIVE Digital Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
HIVE Digital Technologies	$297.79M	2.79	-$148.45M	-$1.29	N/A
TeraWulf	$168.46M	49.58	-$661.42M	-$4.37	N/A

HIVE Digital Technologies has a net margin of -98.49% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -1,179.94%. HIVE Digital Technologies' return on equity of -31.98% beat TeraWulf's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
HIVE Digital Technologies	-98.49%	-31.98%	-23.71%
TeraWulf	-1,179.94%	-458.62%	-8.54%

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 11 more articles in the media than HIVE Digital Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for TeraWulf and 7 mentions for HIVE Digital Technologies. TeraWulf's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat HIVE Digital Technologies' score of 0.59 indicating that TeraWulf is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
HIVE Digital Technologies	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
TeraWulf	10 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

HIVE Digital Technologies has a beta of 3.75, suggesting that its stock price is 275% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TeraWulf has a beta of 3.7, suggesting that its stock price is 270% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

TeraWulf beats HIVE Digital Technologies on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TeraWulf compare to Hut 8?

TeraWulf (NASDAQ:WULF) and Hut 8 (NASDAQ:HUT) are both technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and media sentiment.

Hut 8 has higher revenue and earnings than TeraWulf. Hut 8 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TeraWulf, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
TeraWulf	$168.46M	49.58	-$661.42M	-$4.37	N/A
Hut 8	$235.12M	51.69	-$226.15M	-$5.45	N/A

62.5% of TeraWulf shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.8% of Hut 8 shares are held by institutional investors. 15.9% of TeraWulf shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 10.4% of Hut 8 shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Hut 8 has a net margin of -188.59% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -1,179.94%. Hut 8's return on equity of -0.97% beat TeraWulf's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
TeraWulf	-1,179.94%	-458.62%	-8.54%
Hut 8	-188.59%	-0.97%	-0.36%

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 2 more articles in the media than Hut 8. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for TeraWulf and 16 mentions for Hut 8. Hut 8's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat TeraWulf's score of 0.89 indicating that Hut 8 is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
TeraWulf	10 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Hut 8	10 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

TeraWulf currently has a consensus target price of $34.21, suggesting a potential upside of 104.35%. Hut 8 has a consensus target price of $144.89, suggesting a potential upside of 46.95%. Given TeraWulf's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe TeraWulf is more favorable than Hut 8.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
TeraWulf	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	16 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.95
Hut 8	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	17 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.05

TeraWulf has a beta of 3.7, suggesting that its stock price is 270% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hut 8 has a beta of 4.51, suggesting that its stock price is 351% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Hut 8 beats TeraWulf on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get TeraWulf News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding WULF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

WULF vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	TeraWulf	Software Industry	Technology Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$8.35B	$15.42B	$29.62B	$12.72B
Dividend Yield	N/A	3.43%	2.74%	11.15%
P/E Ratio	N/A	138.41	76.62	25.29
Price / Sales	49.58	1,289.23	589.10	98.94
Price / Cash	N/A	45.12	47.50	51.44
Price / Book	49.24	8.34	7.70	6.20
Net Income	-$661.42M	$434.47M	$704.99M	$358.50M
7 Day Performance	1.39%	-2.04%	-1.08%	-2.35%
1 Month Performance	-2.62%	-1.09%	-3.65%	-2.77%
1 Year Performance	55.58%	-0.19%	180.35%	7.63%

TeraWulf Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
WULF TeraWulf	3.3592 of 5 stars	$16.74 +3.7%	$34.21 +104.4%	+57.3%	$8.35B	$168.46M	N/A	6	Analyst Upgrade
BTBT Bit Digital	3.3855 of 5 stars	$1.64 flat	$5.13 +212.5%	-45.9%	$591.44M	$113.56M	N/A	10	Trending News Analyst Forecast Analyst Revision
CIFR Cipher Mining	3.1048 of 5 stars	$17.74 flat	$28.61 +61.3%	+69.0%	$7.36B	$223.94M	N/A	10	News Coverage Analyst Forecast Options Volume Gap Down
CLSK Cleanspark	3.3007 of 5 stars	$12.69 flat	$23.88 +88.2%	+34.0%	$3.26B	$766.31M	N/A	130	Positive News Insider Trade Gap Down
HIVE HIVE Digital Technologies	3.8154 of 5 stars	$3.11 flat	$6.95 +123.5%	-10.4%	$851.75M	$297.79M	N/A	20	News Coverage Gap Down

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:WULF) was last updated on 9/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

TeraWulf (WULF) Competitors

WULF vs. BTBT, CIFR, CLSK, HIVE, and HUT

How does TeraWulf compare to Bit Digital?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to Cipher Mining?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to Cleanspark?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to HIVE Digital Technologies?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to Hut 8?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

WULF vs. The Competition

TeraWulf Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

TeraWulf (WULF) Competitors

WULF vs. BTBT, CIFR, CLSK, HIVE, and HUT

How does TeraWulf compare to Bit Digital?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, WULF or BTBT?

Is WULF or BTBT more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, WULF or BTBT?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in WULF or BTBT?

Does the media prefer WULF or BTBT?

Do analysts prefer WULF or BTBT?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to Cipher Mining?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of WULF or CIFR?

Do analysts prefer WULF or CIFR?

Is WULF or CIFR more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, WULF or CIFR?

Does the media prefer WULF or CIFR?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, WULF or CIFR?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to Cleanspark?

Is CLSK or WULF more profitable?

Does the media prefer CLSK or WULF?

Which has better valuation and earnings, CLSK or WULF?

Do analysts prefer CLSK or WULF?

Which has more risk and volatility, CLSK or WULF?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in CLSK or WULF?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to HIVE Digital Technologies?

Do analysts recommend HIVE or WULF?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in HIVE or WULF?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, HIVE or WULF?

Is HIVE or WULF more profitable?

Does the media favor HIVE or WULF?

Which has more volatility & risk, HIVE or WULF?

Summary

How does TeraWulf compare to Hut 8?

Which has better earnings and valuation, WULF or HUT?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of WULF or HUT?

Is WULF or HUT more profitable?

Does the media refer more to WULF or HUT?

Do analysts prefer WULF or HUT?

Which has more volatility & risk, WULF or HUT?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

WULF vs. The Competition

TeraWulf Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools