Heico (HEI.A) Competitors

Transdigm Group currently has a consensus price target of $1,463.71, indicating a potential upside of 28.61%. Given Transdigm Group's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Transdigm Group is more favorable than Heico.

Transdigm Group has higher revenue and earnings than Heico. Transdigm Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Heico, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Transdigm Group had 13 more articles in the media than Heico. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Transdigm Group and 0 mentions for Heico. Transdigm Group's average media sentiment score of 1.29 beat Heico's score of 0.00 indicating that Transdigm Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Transdigm Group has a net margin of 19.69% compared to Heico's net margin of 16.38%. Heico's return on equity of 18.00% beat Transdigm Group's return on equity.

Transdigm Group has a beta of 0.91, meaning that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Heico has a beta of 1.08, meaning that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

95.8% of Transdigm Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.0% of Heico shares are held by institutional investors. 3.2% of Transdigm Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.8% of Heico shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Lockheed Martin had 53 more articles in the media than Heico. MarketBeat recorded 53 mentions for Lockheed Martin and 0 mentions for Heico. Lockheed Martin's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Heico's score of 0.00 indicating that Lockheed Martin is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Heico has a net margin of 16.38% compared to Lockheed Martin's net margin of 8.16%. Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 91.42% beat Heico's return on equity.

Lockheed Martin has higher revenue and earnings than Heico. Lockheed Martin is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Heico, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Heico pays an annual dividend of $0.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Lockheed Martin pays an annual dividend of $13.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Heico pays out 4.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lockheed Martin pays out 50.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Lockheed Martin has raised its dividend for 22 consecutive years. Lockheed Martin is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Heico has a beta of 1.08, meaning that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.1, meaning that its share price is 90% less volatile than the broader market.

Lockheed Martin has a consensus target price of $637.56, indicating a potential upside of 21.58%. Given Lockheed Martin's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Lockheed Martin is more favorable than Heico.

59.0% of Heico shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.2% of Lockheed Martin shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.8% of Heico shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Lockheed Martin shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Heico pays an annual dividend of $0.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. General Dynamics pays an annual dividend of $6.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Heico pays out 4.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. General Dynamics pays out 38.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. General Dynamics has raised its dividend for 34 consecutive years. General Dynamics is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

General Dynamics has higher revenue and earnings than Heico. General Dynamics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Heico, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

59.0% of Heico shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.1% of General Dynamics shares are held by institutional investors. 9.8% of Heico shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of General Dynamics shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Heico has a net margin of 16.38% compared to General Dynamics' net margin of 8.18%. Heico's return on equity of 18.00% beat General Dynamics' return on equity.

General Dynamics has a consensus target price of $411.58, suggesting a potential upside of 15.47%. Given General Dynamics' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe General Dynamics is more favorable than Heico.

Heico has a beta of 1.08, suggesting that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, General Dynamics has a beta of 0.32, suggesting that its share price is 68% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, General Dynamics had 22 more articles in the media than Heico. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for General Dynamics and 0 mentions for Heico. General Dynamics' average media sentiment score of 1.44 beat Heico's score of 0.00 indicating that General Dynamics is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Howmet Aerospace has a consensus target price of $316.22, indicating a potential upside of 37.99%. Given Howmet Aerospace's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Howmet Aerospace is more favorable than Heico.

Heico has a beta of 1.08, suggesting that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Howmet Aerospace has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

59.0% of Heico shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.5% of Howmet Aerospace shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.8% of Heico shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Howmet Aerospace shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Heico pays an annual dividend of $0.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Howmet Aerospace pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Heico pays out 4.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Howmet Aerospace pays out 12.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Howmet Aerospace has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Howmet Aerospace is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Howmet Aerospace had 25 more articles in the media than Heico. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Howmet Aerospace and 0 mentions for Heico. Howmet Aerospace's average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Heico's score of 0.00 indicating that Howmet Aerospace is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Howmet Aerospace has a net margin of 20.52% compared to Heico's net margin of 16.38%. Howmet Aerospace's return on equity of 33.91% beat Heico's return on equity.

Howmet Aerospace has higher revenue and earnings than Heico. Heico is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Howmet Aerospace, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.