Heico (HEI.A) Competitors

Transdigm Group has a net margin of 20.24% compared to Heico's net margin of 16.08%. Heico's return on equity of 17.52% beat Transdigm Group's return on equity.

Transdigm Group presently has a consensus price target of $1,477.47, indicating a potential upside of 17.45%. Given Transdigm Group's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Transdigm Group is more favorable than Heico.

95.8% of Transdigm Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.0% of Heico shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.2% of Transdigm Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.8% of Heico shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Transdigm Group had 27 more articles in the media than Heico. MarketBeat recorded 28 mentions for Transdigm Group and 1 mentions for Heico. Transdigm Group's average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Heico's score of 0.00 indicating that Transdigm Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Transdigm Group has higher revenue and earnings than Heico. Transdigm Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Heico, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Transdigm Group has a beta of 0.9, indicating that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Heico has a beta of 1.07, indicating that its share price is 7% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Lockheed Martin had 58 more articles in the media than Heico. MarketBeat recorded 59 mentions for Lockheed Martin and 1 mentions for Heico. Lockheed Martin's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Heico's score of 0.00 indicating that Lockheed Martin is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Lockheed Martin pays an annual dividend of $13.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Heico pays an annual dividend of $0.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Lockheed Martin pays out 50.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Heico pays out 4.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Lockheed Martin has increased its dividend for 22 consecutive years. Lockheed Martin is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

74.2% of Lockheed Martin shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.0% of Heico shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Lockheed Martin shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.8% of Heico shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.11, suggesting that its stock price is 89% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Heico has a beta of 1.07, suggesting that its stock price is 7% more volatile than the broader market.

Lockheed Martin presently has a consensus price target of $626.33, suggesting a potential upside of 7.36%. Given Lockheed Martin's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Lockheed Martin is more favorable than Heico.

Lockheed Martin has higher revenue and earnings than Heico. Lockheed Martin is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Heico, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Heico has a net margin of 16.08% compared to Lockheed Martin's net margin of 8.16%. Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 91.42% beat Heico's return on equity.

Howmet Aerospace has a net margin of 20.23% compared to Heico's net margin of 16.08%. Howmet Aerospace's return on equity of 29.27% beat Heico's return on equity.

Howmet Aerospace pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Heico pays an annual dividend of $0.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Howmet Aerospace pays out 11.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Heico pays out 4.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Howmet Aerospace has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Howmet Aerospace is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Howmet Aerospace had 36 more articles in the media than Heico. MarketBeat recorded 37 mentions for Howmet Aerospace and 1 mentions for Heico. Howmet Aerospace's average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat Heico's score of 0.00 indicating that Howmet Aerospace is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Howmet Aerospace has higher revenue and earnings than Heico. Heico is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Howmet Aerospace, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Howmet Aerospace has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Heico has a beta of 1.07, suggesting that its stock price is 7% more volatile than the broader market.

90.5% of Howmet Aerospace shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.0% of Heico shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Howmet Aerospace shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.8% of Heico shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Howmet Aerospace currently has a consensus target price of $294.53, suggesting a potential upside of 4.08%. Given Howmet Aerospace's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Howmet Aerospace is more favorable than Heico.

General Dynamics has a consensus target price of $406.32, suggesting a potential upside of 5.67%. Given General Dynamics' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe General Dynamics is more favorable than Heico.

Heico has a beta of 1.07, meaning that its share price is 7% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, General Dynamics has a beta of 0.34, meaning that its share price is 66% less volatile than the broader market.

Heico pays an annual dividend of $0.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. General Dynamics pays an annual dividend of $6.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Heico pays out 4.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. General Dynamics pays out 38.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. General Dynamics has raised its dividend for 34 consecutive years. General Dynamics is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

59.0% of Heico shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.1% of General Dynamics shares are held by institutional investors. 9.8% of Heico shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of General Dynamics shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

General Dynamics has higher revenue and earnings than Heico. General Dynamics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Heico, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Heico has a net margin of 16.08% compared to General Dynamics' net margin of 8.18%. Heico's return on equity of 17.52% beat General Dynamics' return on equity.

In the previous week, General Dynamics had 66 more articles in the media than Heico. MarketBeat recorded 67 mentions for General Dynamics and 1 mentions for Heico. General Dynamics' average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat Heico's score of 0.00 indicating that General Dynamics is being referred to more favorably in the news media.