Karman (KRMN) Competitors

Carpenter Technology has higher revenue and earnings than Karman. Carpenter Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Karman, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Karman presently has a consensus target price of $92.10, suggesting a potential upside of 116.10%. Carpenter Technology has a consensus target price of $577.25, suggesting a potential upside of 23.28%. Given Karman's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Karman is more favorable than Carpenter Technology.

In the previous week, Carpenter Technology had 41 more articles in the media than Karman. MarketBeat recorded 50 mentions for Carpenter Technology and 9 mentions for Karman. Carpenter Technology's average media sentiment score of 1.21 beat Karman's score of 0.41 indicating that Carpenter Technology is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Karman has a beta of 0.55, indicating that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Carpenter Technology has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market.

92.0% of Carpenter Technology shares are held by institutional investors. 5.8% of Karman shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Carpenter Technology shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Carpenter Technology has a net margin of 16.96% compared to Karman's net margin of 6.31%. Carpenter Technology's return on equity of 26.46% beat Karman's return on equity.

In the previous week, Curtiss-Wright had 14 more articles in the media than Karman. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Curtiss-Wright and 9 mentions for Karman. Curtiss-Wright's average media sentiment score of 1.45 beat Karman's score of 0.41 indicating that Curtiss-Wright is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Curtiss-Wright has higher revenue and earnings than Karman. Curtiss-Wright is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Karman, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Curtiss-Wright has a beta of 0.87, meaning that its share price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Karman has a beta of 0.55, meaning that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

Curtiss-Wright has a net margin of 14.81% compared to Karman's net margin of 6.31%. Curtiss-Wright's return on equity of 20.49% beat Karman's return on equity.

Curtiss-Wright currently has a consensus price target of $782.50, indicating a potential upside of 35.39%. Karman has a consensus price target of $92.10, indicating a potential upside of 116.10%. Given Karman's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Karman is more favorable than Curtiss-Wright.

82.7% of Curtiss-Wright shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Curtiss-Wright shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.8% of Karman shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Karman has a net margin of 6.31% compared to Arxis' net margin of 0.00%. Karman's return on equity of 15.54% beat Arxis' return on equity.

Arxis has higher revenue and earnings than Karman. Karman is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Arxis, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Karman had 6 more articles in the media than Arxis. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Karman and 3 mentions for Arxis. Arxis' average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Karman's score of 0.41 indicating that Arxis is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Arxis presently has a consensus price target of $53.73, indicating a potential upside of 4.02%. Karman has a consensus price target of $92.10, indicating a potential upside of 116.10%. Given Karman's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Karman is more favorable than Arxis.

Karman has a beta of 0.55, meaning that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FTAI Aviation has a beta of 1.51, meaning that its share price is 51% more volatile than the broader market.

FTAI Aviation has higher revenue and earnings than Karman. FTAI Aviation is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Karman, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Karman had 3 more articles in the media than FTAI Aviation. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Karman and 6 mentions for FTAI Aviation. FTAI Aviation's average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Karman's score of 0.41 indicating that FTAI Aviation is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

89.0% of FTAI Aviation shares are held by institutional investors. 5.8% of Karman shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of FTAI Aviation shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

FTAI Aviation has a net margin of 15.94% compared to Karman's net margin of 6.31%. FTAI Aviation's return on equity of 139.59% beat Karman's return on equity.

Karman presently has a consensus price target of $92.10, indicating a potential upside of 116.10%. FTAI Aviation has a consensus price target of $320.11, indicating a potential upside of 70.68%. Given Karman's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Karman is more favorable than FTAI Aviation.