Carpenter Technology (CRS) Competitors

$408.56 -0.37 (-0.09%)

Closing price 05/15/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$411.50 +2.94 (+0.72%)

As of 07:50 AM Eastern

CRS vs. FSTR, HWKN, IOSP, AGI, and AXTA

Should you buy Carpenter Technology stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Carpenter Technology with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Carpenter Technology include L.B. Foster (FSTR), Hawkins (HWKN), Innospec (IOSP), Alamos Gold (AGI), and Axalta Coating Systems (AXTA). These companies are all part of the "basic materials" sector.

How does Carpenter Technology compare to L.B. Foster?

Carpenter Technology (NYSE:CRS) and L.B. Foster (NASDAQ:FSTR) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends and media sentiment.

Carpenter Technology currently has a consensus price target of $438.78, indicating a potential upside of 7.40%. L.B. Foster has a consensus price target of $32.00, indicating a potential downside of 17.50%. Given Carpenter Technology's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Carpenter Technology is more favorable than L.B. Foster.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Carpenter Technology	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.82
L.B. Foster	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

92.0% of Carpenter Technology shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.6% of L.B. Foster shares are held by institutional investors. 2.9% of Carpenter Technology shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 7.6% of L.B. Foster shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Carpenter Technology has a beta of 1.24, suggesting that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, L.B. Foster has a beta of 1.06, suggesting that its share price is 6% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, L.B. Foster had 1 more articles in the media than Carpenter Technology. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for L.B. Foster and 4 mentions for Carpenter Technology. Carpenter Technology's average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat L.B. Foster's score of 0.85 indicating that Carpenter Technology is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Carpenter Technology	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
L.B. Foster	0 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Carpenter Technology has higher revenue and earnings than L.B. Foster. L.B. Foster is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Carpenter Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Carpenter Technology	$2.88B	7.06	$376M	$9.50	43.01
L.B. Foster	$540.01M	0.75	$7.55M	$1.03	37.66

Carpenter Technology has a net margin of 15.82% compared to L.B. Foster's net margin of 1.98%. Carpenter Technology's return on equity of 25.02% beat L.B. Foster's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Carpenter Technology	15.82%	25.02%	13.96%
L.B. Foster	1.98%	6.36%	3.31%

Summary

Carpenter Technology beats L.B. Foster on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Carpenter Technology compare to Hawkins?

Carpenter Technology (NYSE:CRS) and Hawkins (NASDAQ:HWKN) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

Carpenter Technology has a net margin of 15.82% compared to Hawkins' net margin of 7.53%. Carpenter Technology's return on equity of 25.02% beat Hawkins' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Carpenter Technology	15.82%	25.02%	13.96%
Hawkins	7.53%	16.08%	8.35%

Carpenter Technology has a beta of 1.24, suggesting that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hawkins has a beta of 0.81, suggesting that its share price is 19% less volatile than the broader market.

Carpenter Technology pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Hawkins pays an annual dividend of $0.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Carpenter Technology pays out 8.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hawkins pays out 19.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Hawkins has raised its dividend for 20 consecutive years. Hawkins is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Carpenter Technology currently has a consensus price target of $438.78, indicating a potential upside of 7.40%. Hawkins has a consensus price target of $200.00, indicating a potential upside of 25.80%. Given Hawkins' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Hawkins is more favorable than Carpenter Technology.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Carpenter Technology	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.82
Hawkins	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

In the previous week, Hawkins had 13 more articles in the media than Carpenter Technology. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Hawkins and 4 mentions for Carpenter Technology. Carpenter Technology's average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat Hawkins' score of 0.01 indicating that Carpenter Technology is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Carpenter Technology	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Hawkins	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

92.0% of Carpenter Technology shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.7% of Hawkins shares are held by institutional investors. 2.9% of Carpenter Technology shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.1% of Hawkins shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Carpenter Technology has higher revenue and earnings than Hawkins. Hawkins is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Carpenter Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Carpenter Technology	$2.88B	7.06	$376M	$9.50	43.01
Hawkins	$1.08B	3.06	$81.55M	$3.91	40.66

Summary

Carpenter Technology beats Hawkins on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Carpenter Technology compare to Innospec?

Carpenter Technology (NYSE:CRS) and Innospec (NASDAQ:IOSP) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

Carpenter Technology has a beta of 1.24, suggesting that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Innospec has a beta of 0.9, suggesting that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Carpenter Technology and Carpenter Technology both had 4 articles in the media. Carpenter Technology's average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat Innospec's score of 0.46 indicating that Carpenter Technology is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Carpenter Technology	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Innospec	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

92.0% of Carpenter Technology shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.6% of Innospec shares are held by institutional investors. 2.9% of Carpenter Technology shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Innospec shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Carpenter Technology currently has a consensus price target of $438.78, indicating a potential upside of 7.40%. Given Carpenter Technology's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Carpenter Technology is more favorable than Innospec.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Carpenter Technology	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.82
Innospec	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50

Carpenter Technology pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Innospec pays an annual dividend of $1.74 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Carpenter Technology pays out 8.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Innospec pays out 37.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Innospec has raised its dividend for 11 consecutive years. Innospec is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Carpenter Technology has higher revenue and earnings than Innospec. Innospec is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Carpenter Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Carpenter Technology	$2.88B	7.06	$376M	$9.50	43.01
Innospec	$1.78B	1.08	$116.60M	$4.59	17.03

Carpenter Technology has a net margin of 15.82% compared to Innospec's net margin of 6.38%. Carpenter Technology's return on equity of 25.02% beat Innospec's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Carpenter Technology	15.82%	25.02%	13.96%
Innospec	6.38%	9.32%	6.79%

Summary

Carpenter Technology beats Innospec on 15 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Carpenter Technology compare to Alamos Gold?

Alamos Gold (NYSE:AGI) and Carpenter Technology (NYSE:CRS) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership and risk.

In the previous week, Carpenter Technology had 2 more articles in the media than Alamos Gold. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Carpenter Technology and 2 mentions for Alamos Gold. Carpenter Technology's average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat Alamos Gold's score of -0.33 indicating that Carpenter Technology is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Alamos Gold	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Carpenter Technology	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

Alamos Gold currently has a consensus target price of $50.67, indicating a potential upside of 25.76%. Carpenter Technology has a consensus target price of $438.78, indicating a potential upside of 7.40%. Given Alamos Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Alamos Gold is more favorable than Carpenter Technology.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Alamos Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Carpenter Technology	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.82

Alamos Gold has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Carpenter Technology. Alamos Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Carpenter Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Alamos Gold	$1.81B	9.35	$885.80M	$2.51	16.05
Carpenter Technology	$2.88B	7.06	$376M	$9.50	43.01

64.3% of Alamos Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.0% of Carpenter Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Alamos Gold shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Carpenter Technology shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Alamos Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Carpenter Technology pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Alamos Gold pays out 6.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Carpenter Technology pays out 8.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Alamos Gold is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Alamos Gold has a beta of 0.5, meaning that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Carpenter Technology has a beta of 1.24, meaning that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

Alamos Gold has a net margin of 51.24% compared to Carpenter Technology's net margin of 15.82%. Carpenter Technology's return on equity of 25.02% beat Alamos Gold's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Alamos Gold	51.24%	18.03%	12.42%
Carpenter Technology	15.82%	25.02%	13.96%

Summary

Carpenter Technology beats Alamos Gold on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Carpenter Technology compare to Axalta Coating Systems?

Carpenter Technology (NYSE:CRS) and Axalta Coating Systems (NYSE:AXTA) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk and dividends.

In the previous week, Carpenter Technology had 3 more articles in the media than Axalta Coating Systems. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Carpenter Technology and 1 mentions for Axalta Coating Systems. Carpenter Technology's average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat Axalta Coating Systems' score of 0.95 indicating that Carpenter Technology is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Carpenter Technology	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Axalta Coating Systems	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Axalta Coating Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Carpenter Technology. Axalta Coating Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Carpenter Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Carpenter Technology	$2.88B	7.06	$376M	$9.50	43.01
Axalta Coating Systems	$5.12B	1.12	$378M	$1.71	15.68

Carpenter Technology currently has a consensus price target of $438.78, suggesting a potential upside of 7.40%. Axalta Coating Systems has a consensus price target of $34.15, suggesting a potential upside of 27.35%. Given Axalta Coating Systems' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Axalta Coating Systems is more favorable than Carpenter Technology.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Carpenter Technology	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.82
Axalta Coating Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	12 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

Carpenter Technology has a net margin of 15.82% compared to Axalta Coating Systems' net margin of 7.22%. Carpenter Technology's return on equity of 25.02% beat Axalta Coating Systems' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Carpenter Technology	15.82%	25.02%	13.96%
Axalta Coating Systems	7.22%	22.37%	6.92%

92.0% of Carpenter Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.3% of Axalta Coating Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.9% of Carpenter Technology shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Axalta Coating Systems shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Carpenter Technology has a beta of 1.24, indicating that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Axalta Coating Systems has a beta of 1.24, indicating that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Carpenter Technology beats Axalta Coating Systems on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Carpenter Technology News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CRS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CRS vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Carpenter Technology	STEEL Industry	Materials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$20.30B	$7.55B	$4.77B	$22.71B
Dividend Yield	0.20%	0.85%	5.00%	4.12%
P/E Ratio	43.01	57.41	22.94	29.73
Price / Sales	7.06	1.98	7,477.85	92.51
Price / Cash	39.31	27.99	24.32	18.80
Price / Book	10.78	3.70	6.90	4.57
Net Income	$376M	$150.33M	$157.11M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-5.21%	-0.62%	-2.26%	-1.80%
1 Month Performance	-8.34%	-3.11%	-1.18%	-1.67%
1 Year Performance	75.90%	32.45%	81.70%	21.94%

Carpenter Technology Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CRS Carpenter Technology	4.4816 of 5 stars	$408.56 -0.1%	$438.78 +7.4%	+75.9%	$20.30B	$2.88B	43.01	4,500	Positive News Gap Up
FSTR L.B. Foster	2.5323 of 5 stars	$40.92 -3.3%	$32.00 -21.8%	+99.9%	$442.40M	$540.01M	39.73	1,191
HWKN Hawkins	4.3768 of 5 stars	$171.68 +2.7%	$200.00 +16.5%	+29.6%	$3.49B	$974.43M	43.46	1,035	Earnings Report Dividend Announcement Analyst Revision Gap Down
IOSP Innospec	3.5084 of 5 stars	$80.82 +0.3%	N/A	-12.2%	$2.00B	$1.78B	17.61	2,450
AGI Alamos Gold	4.8893 of 5 stars	$43.94 +1.3%	$50.67 +15.3%	+64.8%	$18.22B	$1.81B	17.51	3,234	Gap Up

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:CRS) was last updated on 5/18/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Carpenter Technology (CRS) Competitors

CRS vs. FSTR, HWKN, IOSP, AGI, and AXTA

How does Carpenter Technology compare to L.B. Foster?

Summary

How does Carpenter Technology compare to Hawkins?

Summary

How does Carpenter Technology compare to Innospec?

Summary

How does Carpenter Technology compare to Alamos Gold?

Summary

How does Carpenter Technology compare to Axalta Coating Systems?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CRS vs. The Competition

Carpenter Technology Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Carpenter Technology (CRS) Competitors

CRS vs. FSTR, HWKN, IOSP, AGI, and AXTA

How does Carpenter Technology compare to L.B. Foster?

Do analysts recommend CRS or FSTR?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of CRS or FSTR?

Which has more volatility & risk, CRS or FSTR?

Does the media prefer CRS or FSTR?

Which has better earnings & valuation, CRS or FSTR?

Is CRS or FSTR more profitable?

Summary

How does Carpenter Technology compare to Hawkins?

Is CRS or HWKN more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, CRS or HWKN?

Is CRS or HWKN a better dividend stock?

Do analysts prefer CRS or HWKN?

Does the media prefer CRS or HWKN?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in CRS or HWKN?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, CRS or HWKN?

Summary

How does Carpenter Technology compare to Innospec?

Which has more risk & volatility, CRS or IOSP?

Does the media prefer CRS or IOSP?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in CRS or IOSP?

Do analysts prefer CRS or IOSP?

Is CRS or IOSP a better dividend stock?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, CRS or IOSP?

Is CRS or IOSP more profitable?

Summary

How does Carpenter Technology compare to Alamos Gold?

Does the media prefer AGI or CRS?

Do analysts recommend AGI or CRS?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, AGI or CRS?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in AGI or CRS?

Is AGI or CRS a better dividend stock?

Which has more volatility and risk, AGI or CRS?

Is AGI or CRS more profitable?

Summary

How does Carpenter Technology compare to Axalta Coating Systems?

Does the media favor CRS or AXTA?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, CRS or AXTA?

Do analysts rate CRS or AXTA?

Is CRS or AXTA more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in CRS or AXTA?

Which has more risk and volatility, CRS or AXTA?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CRS vs. The Competition

Carpenter Technology Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools