Does the media prefer FSTR or CRS?

In the previous week, Carpenter Technology had 20 more articles in the media than L.B. Foster. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Carpenter Technology and 3 mentions for L.B. Foster. Carpenter Technology's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat L.B. Foster's score of 0.60 indicating that Carpenter Technology is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment L.B. Foster 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Carpenter Technology 11 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor CRS or HWKN?

In the previous week, Carpenter Technology had 22 more articles in the media than Hawkins. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Carpenter Technology and 1 mentions for Hawkins. Carpenter Technology's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Hawkins' score of 0.90 indicating that Carpenter Technology is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Carpenter Technology 11 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Hawkins 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer IOSP or CRS?

Carpenter Technology has a consensus price target of $441.00, indicating a potential downside of 8.74%. Given Carpenter Technology's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Carpenter Technology is more favorable than Innospec. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Innospec 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Carpenter Technology 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 9 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.82

Does the media prefer IOSP or CRS?

In the previous week, Carpenter Technology had 20 more articles in the media than Innospec. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Carpenter Technology and 3 mentions for Innospec. Carpenter Technology's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Innospec's score of 0.38 indicating that Carpenter Technology is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Innospec 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Carpenter Technology 11 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer AGI or CRS?

In the previous week, Carpenter Technology had 20 more articles in the media than Alamos Gold. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Carpenter Technology and 3 mentions for Alamos Gold. Carpenter Technology's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Alamos Gold's score of 0.54 indicating that Carpenter Technology is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Alamos Gold 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Carpenter Technology 11 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to AXTA or CRS?

In the previous week, Carpenter Technology had 18 more articles in the media than Axalta Coating Systems. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Carpenter Technology and 5 mentions for Axalta Coating Systems. Carpenter Technology's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Axalta Coating Systems' score of 0.29 indicating that Carpenter Technology is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Axalta Coating Systems 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Carpenter Technology 11 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Carpenter Technology (CRS) Competitors

$483.26 -9.36 (-1.90%)

Closing price 06/5/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$483.00 -0.26 (-0.05%)

As of 06/5/2026 08:00 PM Eastern

Compare

CRS vs. FSTR, HWKN, IOSP, AGI, and AXTA

Should you buy Carpenter Technology stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Carpenter Technology with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Carpenter Technology include L.B. Foster (FSTR), Hawkins (HWKN), Innospec (IOSP), Alamos Gold (AGI), and Axalta Coating Systems (AXTA). These companies are all part of the "basic materials" sector.

How does Carpenter Technology compare to L.B. Foster?

L.B. Foster (NASDAQ:FSTR) and Carpenter Technology (NYSE:CRS) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings and profitability.

80.6% of L.B. Foster shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.0% of Carpenter Technology shares are held by institutional investors. 7.6% of L.B. Foster shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Carpenter Technology shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Carpenter Technology has higher revenue and earnings than L.B. Foster. L.B. Foster is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Carpenter Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
L.B. Foster	$540.01M	0.80	$7.55M	$1.03	40.30
Carpenter Technology	$2.88B	8.35	$376M	$9.50	50.87

In the previous week, Carpenter Technology had 20 more articles in the media than L.B. Foster. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Carpenter Technology and 3 mentions for L.B. Foster. Carpenter Technology's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat L.B. Foster's score of 0.60 indicating that Carpenter Technology is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
L.B. Foster	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Carpenter Technology	11 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

L.B. Foster has a beta of 1.15, meaning that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Carpenter Technology has a beta of 1.25, meaning that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market.

L.B. Foster presently has a consensus price target of $32.00, indicating a potential downside of 22.91%. Carpenter Technology has a consensus price target of $441.00, indicating a potential downside of 8.74%. Given Carpenter Technology's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Carpenter Technology is more favorable than L.B. Foster.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
L.B. Foster	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Carpenter Technology	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.82

Carpenter Technology has a net margin of 15.82% compared to L.B. Foster's net margin of 1.98%. Carpenter Technology's return on equity of 25.02% beat L.B. Foster's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
L.B. Foster	1.98%	6.36%	3.31%
Carpenter Technology	15.82%	25.02%	13.96%

Summary

Carpenter Technology beats L.B. Foster on 15 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Carpenter Technology compare to Hawkins?

Carpenter Technology (NYSE:CRS) and Hawkins (NASDAQ:HWKN) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and profitability.

Carpenter Technology pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Hawkins pays an annual dividend of $0.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Carpenter Technology pays out 8.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hawkins pays out 19.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Hawkins has raised its dividend for 20 consecutive years. Hawkins is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

92.0% of Carpenter Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.7% of Hawkins shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.9% of Carpenter Technology shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.1% of Hawkins shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Carpenter Technology had 22 more articles in the media than Hawkins. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Carpenter Technology and 1 mentions for Hawkins. Carpenter Technology's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Hawkins' score of 0.90 indicating that Carpenter Technology is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Carpenter Technology	11 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Hawkins	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Carpenter Technology has higher revenue and earnings than Hawkins. Hawkins is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Carpenter Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Carpenter Technology	$2.88B	8.35	$376M	$9.50	50.87
Hawkins	$1.08B	2.99	$81.55M	$3.91	39.66

Carpenter Technology currently has a consensus target price of $441.00, suggesting a potential downside of 8.74%. Hawkins has a consensus target price of $200.00, suggesting a potential upside of 28.97%. Given Hawkins' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Hawkins is more favorable than Carpenter Technology.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Carpenter Technology	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.82
Hawkins	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Carpenter Technology has a beta of 1.25, meaning that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hawkins has a beta of 0.76, meaning that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

Carpenter Technology has a net margin of 15.82% compared to Hawkins' net margin of 7.53%. Carpenter Technology's return on equity of 25.02% beat Hawkins' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Carpenter Technology	15.82%	25.02%	13.96%
Hawkins	7.53%	16.08%	8.35%

Summary

Carpenter Technology beats Hawkins on 15 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Carpenter Technology compare to Innospec?

Innospec (NASDAQ:IOSP) and Carpenter Technology (NYSE:CRS) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and risk.

96.6% of Innospec shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.0% of Carpenter Technology shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Innospec shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Carpenter Technology shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Carpenter Technology has a net margin of 15.82% compared to Innospec's net margin of 6.38%. Carpenter Technology's return on equity of 25.02% beat Innospec's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Innospec	6.38%	9.32%	6.79%
Carpenter Technology	15.82%	25.02%	13.96%

Carpenter Technology has a consensus price target of $441.00, indicating a potential downside of 8.74%. Given Carpenter Technology's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Carpenter Technology is more favorable than Innospec.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Innospec	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Carpenter Technology	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.82

In the previous week, Carpenter Technology had 20 more articles in the media than Innospec. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Carpenter Technology and 3 mentions for Innospec. Carpenter Technology's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Innospec's score of 0.38 indicating that Carpenter Technology is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Innospec	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Carpenter Technology	11 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Innospec has a beta of 0.92, indicating that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Carpenter Technology has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the broader market.

Innospec pays an annual dividend of $1.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Carpenter Technology pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Innospec pays out 40.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Carpenter Technology pays out 8.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Innospec has raised its dividend for 11 consecutive years. Innospec is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Carpenter Technology has higher revenue and earnings than Innospec. Innospec is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Carpenter Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Innospec	$1.78B	1.12	$116.60M	$4.59	17.58
Carpenter Technology	$2.88B	8.35	$376M	$9.50	50.87

Summary

Carpenter Technology beats Innospec on 16 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Carpenter Technology compare to Alamos Gold?

Alamos Gold (NYSE:AGI) and Carpenter Technology (NYSE:CRS) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and profitability.

64.3% of Alamos Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.0% of Carpenter Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Alamos Gold shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Carpenter Technology shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Alamos Gold has a beta of 0.49, meaning that its share price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Carpenter Technology has a beta of 1.25, meaning that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market.

Alamos Gold presently has a consensus price target of $50.67, suggesting a potential upside of 42.94%. Carpenter Technology has a consensus price target of $441.00, suggesting a potential downside of 8.74%. Given Alamos Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Alamos Gold is more favorable than Carpenter Technology.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Alamos Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Carpenter Technology	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.82

Alamos Gold has a net margin of 51.24% compared to Carpenter Technology's net margin of 15.82%. Carpenter Technology's return on equity of 25.02% beat Alamos Gold's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Alamos Gold	51.24%	18.03%	12.42%
Carpenter Technology	15.82%	25.02%	13.96%

Alamos Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Carpenter Technology pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Alamos Gold pays out 6.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Carpenter Technology pays out 8.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Alamos Gold is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Alamos Gold has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Carpenter Technology. Alamos Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Carpenter Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Alamos Gold	$1.81B	8.23	$885.80M	$2.51	14.12
Carpenter Technology	$2.88B	8.35	$376M	$9.50	50.87

In the previous week, Carpenter Technology had 20 more articles in the media than Alamos Gold. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Carpenter Technology and 3 mentions for Alamos Gold. Carpenter Technology's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Alamos Gold's score of 0.54 indicating that Carpenter Technology is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Alamos Gold	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Carpenter Technology	11 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Carpenter Technology beats Alamos Gold on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Carpenter Technology compare to Axalta Coating Systems?

Axalta Coating Systems (NYSE:AXTA) and Carpenter Technology (NYSE:CRS) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Carpenter Technology had 18 more articles in the media than Axalta Coating Systems. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Carpenter Technology and 5 mentions for Axalta Coating Systems. Carpenter Technology's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Axalta Coating Systems' score of 0.29 indicating that Carpenter Technology is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Axalta Coating Systems	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Carpenter Technology	11 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Axalta Coating Systems presently has a consensus target price of $34.31, suggesting a potential upside of 6.56%. Carpenter Technology has a consensus target price of $441.00, suggesting a potential downside of 8.74%. Given Axalta Coating Systems' higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Axalta Coating Systems is more favorable than Carpenter Technology.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Axalta Coating Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	12 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
Carpenter Technology	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.82

98.3% of Axalta Coating Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.0% of Carpenter Technology shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Axalta Coating Systems shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Carpenter Technology shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Axalta Coating Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Carpenter Technology. Axalta Coating Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Carpenter Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Axalta Coating Systems	$5.12B	1.35	$378M	$1.71	18.83
Carpenter Technology	$2.88B	8.35	$376M	$9.50	50.87

Axalta Coating Systems has a beta of 1.25, meaning that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Carpenter Technology has a beta of 1.25, meaning that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the broader market.

Carpenter Technology has a net margin of 15.82% compared to Axalta Coating Systems' net margin of 7.22%. Carpenter Technology's return on equity of 25.02% beat Axalta Coating Systems' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Axalta Coating Systems	7.22%	22.37%	6.92%
Carpenter Technology	15.82%	25.02%	13.96%

Summary

Carpenter Technology beats Axalta Coating Systems on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Carpenter Technology News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CRS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CRS vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Carpenter Technology	STEEL Industry	Materials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$24.03B	$8.60B	$4.78B	$23.05B
Dividend Yield	0.17%	0.80%	4.98%	4.10%
P/E Ratio	50.87	61.71	22.24	30.25
Price / Sales	8.35	2.27	6,926.72	22.14
Price / Cash	46.48	31.09	26.82	23.97
Price / Book	12.75	4.24	9.12	4.63
Net Income	$376M	$150.33M	$156.62M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	3.20%	0.92%	-4.47%	-1.66%
1 Month Performance	8.51%	3.57%	-4.16%	-1.07%
1 Year Performance	94.25%	38.52%	59.19%	21.20%

Carpenter Technology Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CRS Carpenter Technology	3.8031 of 5 stars	$483.26 -1.9%	$441.00 -8.7%	+94.2%	$24.03B	$2.88B	50.87	4,500	Trending News Analyst Downgrade Analyst Revision
FSTR L.B. Foster	3.1125 of 5 stars	$41.35 +0.5%	$32.00 -22.6%	+114.9%	$430.27M	$540.01M	40.15	1,191	News Coverage Analyst Upgrade
HWKN Hawkins	4.2273 of 5 stars	$157.90 +2.0%	$200.00 +26.7%	+14.6%	$3.23B	$1.08B	40.38	1,200
IOSP Innospec	3.9004 of 5 stars	$81.93 -1.2%	N/A	-6.3%	$2.04B	$1.78B	17.85	2,450	News Coverage Analyst Upgrade
AGI Alamos Gold	4.8226 of 5 stars	$39.61 -2.9%	$50.67 +27.9%	+32.9%	$17.13B	$1.81B	15.78	3,234	Gap Down

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:CRS) was last updated on 6/7/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Carpenter Technology (CRS) Competitors

CRS vs. FSTR, HWKN, IOSP, AGI, and AXTA

How does Carpenter Technology compare to L.B. Foster?

Summary

How does Carpenter Technology compare to Hawkins?

Summary

How does Carpenter Technology compare to Innospec?

Summary

How does Carpenter Technology compare to Alamos Gold?

Summary

How does Carpenter Technology compare to Axalta Coating Systems?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CRS vs. The Competition

Carpenter Technology Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Carpenter Technology (CRS) Competitors

CRS vs. FSTR, HWKN, IOSP, AGI, and AXTA

How does Carpenter Technology compare to L.B. Foster?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in FSTR or CRS?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, FSTR or CRS?

Does the media prefer FSTR or CRS?

Which has more risk and volatility, FSTR or CRS?

Do analysts rate FSTR or CRS?

Is FSTR or CRS more profitable?

Summary

How does Carpenter Technology compare to Hawkins?

Is CRS or HWKN a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in CRS or HWKN?

Does the media favor CRS or HWKN?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, CRS or HWKN?

Do analysts rate CRS or HWKN?

Which has more volatility and risk, CRS or HWKN?

Is CRS or HWKN more profitable?

Summary

How does Carpenter Technology compare to Innospec?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of IOSP or CRS?

Is IOSP or CRS more profitable?

Do analysts prefer IOSP or CRS?

Does the media prefer IOSP or CRS?

Which has more volatility and risk, IOSP or CRS?

Is IOSP or CRS a better dividend stock?

Which has better valuation & earnings, IOSP or CRS?

Summary

How does Carpenter Technology compare to Alamos Gold?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in AGI or CRS?

Which has more volatility & risk, AGI or CRS?

Do analysts recommend AGI or CRS?

Is AGI or CRS more profitable?

Is AGI or CRS a better dividend stock?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, AGI or CRS?

Does the media prefer AGI or CRS?

Summary

How does Carpenter Technology compare to Axalta Coating Systems?

Does the media refer more to AXTA or CRS?

Do analysts prefer AXTA or CRS?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in AXTA or CRS?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, AXTA or CRS?

Which has more risk and volatility, AXTA or CRS?

Is AXTA or CRS more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CRS vs. The Competition

Carpenter Technology Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools