Go Pro

Carpenter Technology (CRS) Competitors

Carpenter Technology logo
$556.52 +2.12 (+0.38%)
Closing price 07/17/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$562.59 +6.07 (+1.09%)
As of 07/17/2026 07:54 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

CRS vs. FSTR, HWKN, IOSP, AGI, and AXTA

Should you buy Carpenter Technology stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Carpenter Technology with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Carpenter Technology include L.B. Foster (FSTR), Hawkins (HWKN), Innospec (IOSP), Alamos Gold (AGI), and Axalta Coating Systems (AXTA). These companies are all part of the "basic materials" sector.

How does Carpenter Technology compare to L.B. Foster?

Carpenter Technology (NYSE:CRS) and L.B. Foster (NASDAQ:FSTR) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, profitability, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

92.0% of Carpenter Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.6% of L.B. Foster shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.9% of Carpenter Technology shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.6% of L.B. Foster shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Carpenter Technology had 30 more articles in the media than L.B. Foster. MarketBeat recorded 32 mentions for Carpenter Technology and 2 mentions for L.B. Foster. Carpenter Technology's average media sentiment score of 1.22 beat L.B. Foster's score of 0.71 indicating that Carpenter Technology is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Carpenter Technology
16 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
L.B. Foster
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Carpenter Technology has higher revenue and earnings than L.B. Foster. L.B. Foster is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Carpenter Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Carpenter Technology$2.88B9.61$376M$9.5058.58
L.B. Foster$563.36M0.78$7.55M$1.0340.71

Carpenter Technology presently has a consensus price target of $556.75, indicating a potential upside of 0.04%. L.B. Foster has a consensus price target of $32.00, indicating a potential downside of 23.68%. Given Carpenter Technology's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Carpenter Technology is more favorable than L.B. Foster.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Carpenter Technology
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
L.B. Foster
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

Carpenter Technology has a beta of 1.22, meaning that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, L.B. Foster has a beta of 1.14, meaning that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the broader market.

Carpenter Technology pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. L.B. Foster pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Carpenter Technology pays out 8.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. L.B. Foster pays out 15.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Carpenter Technology has a net margin of 15.82% compared to L.B. Foster's net margin of 1.98%. Carpenter Technology's return on equity of 25.02% beat L.B. Foster's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Carpenter Technology15.82% 25.02% 13.96%
L.B. Foster 1.98%6.36%3.31%

Summary

Carpenter Technology beats L.B. Foster on 17 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Carpenter Technology compare to Hawkins?

Hawkins (NASDAQ:HWKN) and Carpenter Technology (NYSE:CRS) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, profitability, media sentiment, valuation and dividends.

In the previous week, Carpenter Technology had 31 more articles in the media than Hawkins. MarketBeat recorded 32 mentions for Carpenter Technology and 1 mentions for Hawkins. Carpenter Technology's average media sentiment score of 1.22 beat Hawkins' score of 0.00 indicating that Carpenter Technology is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Hawkins
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Carpenter Technology
16 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

69.7% of Hawkins shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.0% of Carpenter Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.7% of Hawkins shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Carpenter Technology shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Carpenter Technology has higher revenue and earnings than Hawkins. Hawkins is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Carpenter Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hawkins$1.08B2.79$81.55M$3.9136.93
Carpenter Technology$2.88B9.61$376M$9.5058.58

Hawkins presently has a consensus target price of $185.00, indicating a potential upside of 28.11%. Carpenter Technology has a consensus target price of $556.75, indicating a potential upside of 0.04%. Given Hawkins' higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Hawkins is more favorable than Carpenter Technology.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hawkins
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.20
Carpenter Technology
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Hawkins has a beta of 0.78, meaning that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Carpenter Technology has a beta of 1.22, meaning that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the broader market.

Carpenter Technology has a net margin of 15.82% compared to Hawkins' net margin of 7.53%. Carpenter Technology's return on equity of 25.02% beat Hawkins' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hawkins7.53% 16.08% 8.35%
Carpenter Technology 15.82%25.02%13.96%

Hawkins pays an annual dividend of $0.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Carpenter Technology pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Hawkins pays out 19.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Carpenter Technology pays out 8.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Hawkins has raised its dividend for 20 consecutive years. Hawkins is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Carpenter Technology beats Hawkins on 16 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Carpenter Technology compare to Innospec?

Carpenter Technology (NYSE:CRS) and Innospec (NASDAQ:IOSP) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, valuation, risk and analyst recommendations.

Carpenter Technology presently has a consensus target price of $556.75, indicating a potential upside of 0.04%. Given Carpenter Technology's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Carpenter Technology is more favorable than Innospec.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Carpenter Technology
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Innospec
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

92.0% of Carpenter Technology shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.6% of Innospec shares are held by institutional investors. 2.9% of Carpenter Technology shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Innospec shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Carpenter Technology has a beta of 1.22, meaning that its share price is 22% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Innospec has a beta of 0.93, meaning that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

Carpenter Technology pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Innospec pays an annual dividend of $1.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Carpenter Technology pays out 8.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Innospec pays out 40.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Innospec has raised its dividend for 11 consecutive years. Innospec is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Carpenter Technology has a net margin of 15.82% compared to Innospec's net margin of 6.38%. Carpenter Technology's return on equity of 25.02% beat Innospec's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Carpenter Technology15.82% 25.02% 13.96%
Innospec 6.38%9.32%6.79%

In the previous week, Carpenter Technology had 27 more articles in the media than Innospec. MarketBeat recorded 32 mentions for Carpenter Technology and 5 mentions for Innospec. Carpenter Technology's average media sentiment score of 1.22 beat Innospec's score of 0.40 indicating that Carpenter Technology is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Carpenter Technology
16 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Innospec
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Carpenter Technology has higher revenue and earnings than Innospec. Innospec is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Carpenter Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Carpenter Technology$2.88B9.61$376M$9.5058.58
Innospec$1.78B1.17$116.60M$4.5918.36

Summary

Carpenter Technology beats Innospec on 17 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Carpenter Technology compare to Alamos Gold?

Carpenter Technology (NYSE:CRS) and Alamos Gold (NYSE:AGI) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends and valuation.

In the previous week, Carpenter Technology had 22 more articles in the media than Alamos Gold. MarketBeat recorded 32 mentions for Carpenter Technology and 10 mentions for Alamos Gold. Carpenter Technology's average media sentiment score of 1.22 beat Alamos Gold's score of 1.17 indicating that Carpenter Technology is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Carpenter Technology
16 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Alamos Gold
6 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Alamos Gold has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Carpenter Technology. Alamos Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Carpenter Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Carpenter Technology$2.88B9.61$376M$9.5058.58
Alamos Gold$1.81B6.54$885.80M$2.5111.26

Alamos Gold has a net margin of 51.24% compared to Carpenter Technology's net margin of 15.82%. Carpenter Technology's return on equity of 25.02% beat Alamos Gold's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Carpenter Technology15.82% 25.02% 13.96%
Alamos Gold 51.24%18.03%12.42%

92.0% of Carpenter Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.3% of Alamos Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.9% of Carpenter Technology shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Alamos Gold shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Carpenter Technology pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Alamos Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Carpenter Technology pays out 8.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Alamos Gold pays out 6.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Alamos Gold is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Carpenter Technology has a beta of 1.22, meaning that its share price is 22% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alamos Gold has a beta of 0.55, meaning that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

Carpenter Technology presently has a consensus target price of $556.75, indicating a potential upside of 0.04%. Alamos Gold has a consensus target price of $47.50, indicating a potential upside of 68.06%. Given Alamos Gold's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Alamos Gold is more favorable than Carpenter Technology.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Carpenter Technology
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Alamos Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.91

Summary

Carpenter Technology beats Alamos Gold on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Carpenter Technology compare to Axalta Coating Systems?

Carpenter Technology (NYSE:CRS) and Axalta Coating Systems (NYSE:AXTA) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.

In the previous week, Carpenter Technology had 28 more articles in the media than Axalta Coating Systems. MarketBeat recorded 32 mentions for Carpenter Technology and 4 mentions for Axalta Coating Systems. Carpenter Technology's average media sentiment score of 1.22 beat Axalta Coating Systems' score of 0.59 indicating that Carpenter Technology is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Carpenter Technology
16 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Axalta Coating Systems
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

92.0% of Carpenter Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.3% of Axalta Coating Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.9% of Carpenter Technology shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Axalta Coating Systems shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Carpenter Technology has a net margin of 15.82% compared to Axalta Coating Systems' net margin of 7.22%. Carpenter Technology's return on equity of 25.02% beat Axalta Coating Systems' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Carpenter Technology15.82% 25.02% 13.96%
Axalta Coating Systems 7.22%22.37%6.92%

Carpenter Technology has a beta of 1.22, indicating that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Axalta Coating Systems has a beta of 1.24, indicating that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

Carpenter Technology presently has a consensus target price of $556.75, suggesting a potential upside of 0.04%. Axalta Coating Systems has a consensus target price of $35.67, suggesting a potential upside of 10.28%. Given Axalta Coating Systems' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Axalta Coating Systems is more favorable than Carpenter Technology.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Carpenter Technology
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Axalta Coating Systems
0 Sell rating(s)
11 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.27

Axalta Coating Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Carpenter Technology. Axalta Coating Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Carpenter Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Carpenter Technology$2.88B9.61$376M$9.5058.58
Axalta Coating Systems$5.12B1.35$378M$1.7118.91

Summary

Carpenter Technology beats Axalta Coating Systems on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Carpenter Technology News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CRS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CRS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CRS vs. The Competition

MetricCarpenter TechnologySTEEL IndustryMaterials SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$27.71B$9.16B$4.47B$23.39B
Dividend Yield0.14%0.96%5.04%4.16%
P/E Ratio58.5862.7820.4930.95
Price / Sales9.612.466,009.86164.56
Price / Cash53.6124.1226.4131.95
Price / Book14.684.548.564.76
Net Income$376M$183.79M$157.11M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-3.85%11.23%-2.24%-0.01%
1 Month Performance-5.00%8.43%-5.60%1.08%
1 Year Performance93.87%24.22%36.06%16.70%

Carpenter Technology Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CRS
Carpenter Technology
4.1344 of 5 stars
$556.52
+0.4%
$556.75
+0.0%
+93.9%$27.71B$2.88B58.584,500
FSTR
L.B. Foster
2.0075 of 5 stars
$41.34
-2.8%
$32.00
-22.6%
+84.4%$445.02M$540.01M40.141,191
HWKN
Hawkins
3.0502 of 5 stars
$133.87
+0.1%
$185.00
+38.2%
-10.5%$2.80B$1.08B34.241,200
IOSP
Innospec
3.3736 of 5 stars
$82.03
+0.5%
N/A+1.5%$2.01B$1.79B17.872,450
AGI
Alamos Gold
4.9986 of 5 stars
$28.85
-2.1%
$47.50
+64.7%
+13.7%$12.35B$2.07B11.493,234

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:CRS) was last updated on 7/19/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners