Which has preferable earnings and valuation, FSTR or HWKN?

Hawkins has higher revenue and earnings than L.B. Foster. Hawkins is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than L.B. Foster, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio L.B. Foster $540.01M 0.73 $7.55M $1.05 35.50 Hawkins $1.08B 2.53 $81.55M $3.86 34.04

Is FSTR or HWKN more profitable?

Hawkins has a net margin of 7.29% compared to L.B. Foster's net margin of 2.04%. Hawkins' return on equity of 15.42% beat L.B. Foster's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets L.B. Foster 2.04% 7.61% 4.03% Hawkins 7.29% 15.42% 8.22%

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, LIN or FSTR?

Linde has higher revenue and earnings than L.B. Foster. Linde is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than L.B. Foster, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Linde $33.99B 6.50 $6.90B $15.48 30.97 L.B. Foster $540.01M 0.73 $7.55M $1.05 35.50

Is LIN or FSTR more profitable?

Linde has a net margin of 20.43% compared to L.B. Foster's net margin of 2.04%. Linde's return on equity of 20.09% beat L.B. Foster's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Linde 20.43% 20.09% 9.28% L.B. Foster 2.04% 7.61% 4.03%

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, FSTR or KOP?

Koppers has higher revenue and earnings than L.B. Foster. Koppers is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than L.B. Foster, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio L.B. Foster $540.01M 0.73 $7.55M $1.05 35.50 Koppers $1.88B 0.46 $56M -$4.72 N/A

Is FSTR or KOP more profitable?

L.B. Foster has a net margin of 2.04% compared to Koppers' net margin of -4.59%. Koppers' return on equity of 14.98% beat L.B. Foster's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets L.B. Foster 2.04% 7.61% 4.03% Koppers -4.59% 14.98% 4.17%

Which has better earnings and valuation, FSTR or CMPO?

L.B. Foster has higher revenue and earnings than CompoSecure. CompoSecure is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than L.B. Foster, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio L.B. Foster $540.01M 0.73 $7.55M $1.05 35.50 CompoSecure $160.68M 10.15 -$53.72M -$2.16 N/A

Is FSTR or CMPO more profitable?

L.B. Foster has a net margin of 2.04% compared to CompoSecure's net margin of -24.53%. L.B. Foster's return on equity of 7.61% beat CompoSecure's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets L.B. Foster 2.04% 7.61% 4.03% CompoSecure -24.53% -65.50% 26.83%

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, HLMN or FSTR?

Hillman Solutions has higher revenue and earnings than L.B. Foster. Hillman Solutions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than L.B. Foster, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Hillman Solutions $1.55B 0.88 $40.31M $0.22 32.00 L.B. Foster $540.01M 0.73 $7.55M $1.05 35.50

L.B. Foster (FSTR) Competitors

$37.27 +0.91 (+2.50%)

Closing price 10/2/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$37.33 +0.06 (+0.16%)

As of 10/2/2026 04:15 PM Eastern

Compare

FSTR vs. HWKN, LIN, KOP, CMPO, and HLMN

Should you buy L.B. Foster stock or one of its competitors? L.B. Foster's main competitors and comparable companies include Hawkins (HWKN), Linde (LIN), Koppers (KOP), CompoSecure (CMPO), and Hillman Solutions (HLMN). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size.

How does L.B. Foster compare to Hawkins?

L.B. Foster (NASDAQ:FSTR) and Hawkins (NASDAQ:HWKN) are related companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, profitability and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Hawkins had 4 more articles in the media than L.B. Foster. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Hawkins and 0 mentions for L.B. Foster. Hawkins' average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat L.B. Foster's score of 0.00 indicating that Hawkins is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
L.B. Foster	Neutral
Hawkins	Positive

L.B. Foster presently has a consensus target price of $32.00, indicating a potential downside of 14.14%. Hawkins has a consensus target price of $171.00, indicating a potential upside of 30.13%. Given Hawkins' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Hawkins is more favorable than L.B. Foster.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
L.B. Foster	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
Hawkins	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Hawkins has higher revenue and earnings than L.B. Foster. Hawkins is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than L.B. Foster, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
L.B. Foster	$540.01M	0.73	$7.55M	$1.05	35.50
Hawkins	$1.08B	2.53	$81.55M	$3.86	34.04

Hawkins has a net margin of 7.29% compared to L.B. Foster's net margin of 2.04%. Hawkins' return on equity of 15.42% beat L.B. Foster's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
L.B. Foster	2.04%	7.61%	4.03%
Hawkins	7.29%	15.42%	8.22%

L.B. Foster has a beta of 1.13, indicating that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hawkins has a beta of 0.74, indicating that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

80.6% of L.B. Foster shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.7% of Hawkins shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.6% of L.B. Foster shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of Hawkins shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Hawkins beats L.B. Foster on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does L.B. Foster compare to Linde?

Linde (NASDAQ:LIN) and L.B. Foster (NASDAQ:FSTR) are related companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

Linde has higher revenue and earnings than L.B. Foster. Linde is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than L.B. Foster, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Linde	$33.99B	6.50	$6.90B	$15.48	30.97
L.B. Foster	$540.01M	0.73	$7.55M	$1.05	35.50

Linde has a net margin of 20.43% compared to L.B. Foster's net margin of 2.04%. Linde's return on equity of 20.09% beat L.B. Foster's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Linde	20.43%	20.09%	9.28%
L.B. Foster	2.04%	7.61%	4.03%

Linde presently has a consensus price target of $547.05, suggesting a potential upside of 14.09%. L.B. Foster has a consensus price target of $32.00, suggesting a potential downside of 14.14%. Given Linde's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Linde is more favorable than L.B. Foster.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Linde	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	19 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
L.B. Foster	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

82.8% of Linde shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.6% of L.B. Foster shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Linde shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.6% of L.B. Foster shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Linde has a beta of 0.71, suggesting that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, L.B. Foster has a beta of 1.13, suggesting that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Linde had 8 more articles in the media than L.B. Foster. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Linde and 0 mentions for L.B. Foster. Linde's average media sentiment score of 0.53 beat L.B. Foster's score of 0.00 indicating that Linde is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Linde	Positive
L.B. Foster	Neutral

Summary

Linde beats L.B. Foster on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does L.B. Foster compare to Koppers?

L.B. Foster (NASDAQ:FSTR) and Koppers (NYSE:KOP) are related small-cap companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, valuation and profitability.

80.6% of L.B. Foster shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.8% of Koppers shares are held by institutional investors. 7.6% of L.B. Foster shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 7.3% of Koppers shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

L.B. Foster has a beta of 1.13, meaning that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Koppers has a beta of 1.23, meaning that its share price is 23% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Koppers had 1 more articles in the media than L.B. Foster. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Koppers and 0 mentions for L.B. Foster. Koppers' average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat L.B. Foster's score of 0.00 indicating that Koppers is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
L.B. Foster	Neutral
Koppers	Positive

Koppers has higher revenue and earnings than L.B. Foster. Koppers is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than L.B. Foster, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
L.B. Foster	$540.01M	0.73	$7.55M	$1.05	35.50
Koppers	$1.88B	0.46	$56M	-$4.72	N/A

L.B. Foster has a net margin of 2.04% compared to Koppers' net margin of -4.59%. Koppers' return on equity of 14.98% beat L.B. Foster's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
L.B. Foster	2.04%	7.61%	4.03%
Koppers	-4.59%	14.98%	4.17%

L.B. Foster presently has a consensus price target of $32.00, indicating a potential downside of 14.14%. Koppers has a consensus price target of $55.00, indicating a potential upside of 19.46%. Given Koppers' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Koppers is more favorable than L.B. Foster.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
L.B. Foster	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
Koppers	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Summary

Koppers beats L.B. Foster on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does L.B. Foster compare to CompoSecure?

L.B. Foster (NASDAQ:FSTR) and CompoSecure (NASDAQ:CMPO) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

In the previous week, L.B. Foster's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CompoSecure'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
L.B. Foster	Neutral
CompoSecure	Neutral

L.B. Foster has higher revenue and earnings than CompoSecure. CompoSecure is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than L.B. Foster, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
L.B. Foster	$540.01M	0.73	$7.55M	$1.05	35.50
CompoSecure	$160.68M	10.15	-$53.72M	-$2.16	N/A

80.6% of L.B. Foster shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.6% of CompoSecure shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.6% of L.B. Foster shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 52.1% of CompoSecure shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

L.B. Foster currently has a consensus target price of $32.00, indicating a potential downside of 14.14%. CompoSecure has a consensus target price of $26.00, indicating a potential upside of 101.55%. Given CompoSecure's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe CompoSecure is more favorable than L.B. Foster.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
L.B. Foster	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
CompoSecure	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

L.B. Foster has a net margin of 2.04% compared to CompoSecure's net margin of -24.53%. L.B. Foster's return on equity of 7.61% beat CompoSecure's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
L.B. Foster	2.04%	7.61%	4.03%
CompoSecure	-24.53%	-65.50%	26.83%

L.B. Foster has a beta of 1.13, indicating that its stock price is 13% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CompoSecure has a beta of 0.98, indicating that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

L.B. Foster beats CompoSecure on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does L.B. Foster compare to Hillman Solutions?

Hillman Solutions (NASDAQ:HLMN) and L.B. Foster (NASDAQ:FSTR) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Hillman Solutions has higher revenue and earnings than L.B. Foster. Hillman Solutions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than L.B. Foster, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hillman Solutions	$1.55B	0.88	$40.31M	$0.22	32.00
L.B. Foster	$540.01M	0.73	$7.55M	$1.05	35.50

In the previous week, Hillman Solutions had 4 more articles in the media than L.B. Foster. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Hillman Solutions and 0 mentions for L.B. Foster. L.B. Foster's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Hillman Solutions' score of -0.31 indicating that L.B. Foster is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Hillman Solutions	Neutral
L.B. Foster	Neutral

98.1% of Hillman Solutions shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.6% of L.B. Foster shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.3% of Hillman Solutions shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.6% of L.B. Foster shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Hillman Solutions has a net margin of 2.57% compared to L.B. Foster's net margin of 2.04%. Hillman Solutions' return on equity of 9.11% beat L.B. Foster's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hillman Solutions	2.57%	9.11%	4.70%
L.B. Foster	2.04%	7.61%	4.03%

Hillman Solutions currently has a consensus price target of $12.67, indicating a potential upside of 79.92%. L.B. Foster has a consensus price target of $32.00, indicating a potential downside of 14.14%. Given Hillman Solutions' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Hillman Solutions is more favorable than L.B. Foster.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hillman Solutions	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
L.B. Foster	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

Hillman Solutions has a beta of 1.42, suggesting that its share price is 42% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, L.B. Foster has a beta of 1.13, suggesting that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Hillman Solutions beats L.B. Foster on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get L.B. Foster News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FSTR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

FSTR vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	L.B. Foster	Machinery Industry	Industrials Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$392.07M	$11.26B	$10.19B	$13.28B
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.31%	96.63%	17.33%
P/E Ratio	35.50	21.33	26.66	26.04
Price / Sales	0.73	62.17	270.35	91.98
Price / Cash	19.37	23.30	24.04	34.69
Price / Book	2.20	4.28	4.82	6.34
Net Income	$7.55M	$379.00M	$614.98M	$381.73M
7 Day Performance	-0.53%	-0.51%	-0.58%	-1.66%
1 Month Performance	-1.97%	-2.99%	-2.51%	-4.68%
1 Year Performance	40.22%	5.68%	2.72%	1.57%

L.B. Foster Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count
FSTR L.B. Foster	2.0721 of 5 stars	$37.27 +2.5%	$32.00 -14.1%	+40.2%	$392.07M	$540.01M	35.50	1,191
HWKN Hawkins	4.7661 of 5 stars	$126.15 -1.3%	$171.00 +35.6%	-28.1%	$2.63B	$1.08B	32.68	1,200
LIN Linde	4.3089 of 5 stars	$473.37 +0.3%	$547.05 +15.6%	+2.7%	$218.21B	$35.45B	30.58	65,177
KOP Koppers	3.966 of 5 stars	$46.08 -0.2%	$55.00 +19.4%	+70.8%	$871.47M	$1.89B	N/A	1,859
CMPO CompoSecure	1.9269 of 5 stars	$11.63 +0.2%	$26.00 +123.6%	-36.6%	$1.47B	$160.68M	N/A	720

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:FSTR) was last updated on 10/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

L.B. Foster (FSTR) Competitors