Which has preferable earnings and valuation, HWKN or FSTR?

Hawkins has higher revenue and earnings than L.B. Foster. Hawkins is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than L.B. Foster, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Hawkins $1.08B 2.39 $81.55M $3.86 32.14 L.B. Foster $540.01M 0.73 $7.55M $1.05 35.80

Is HWKN or FSTR more profitable?

Hawkins has a net margin of 7.29% compared to L.B. Foster's net margin of 2.04%. Hawkins' return on equity of 15.42% beat L.B. Foster's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Hawkins 7.29% 15.42% 8.22% L.B. Foster 2.04% 7.61% 4.03%

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, FSTR or LIN?

Linde has higher revenue and earnings than L.B. Foster. Linde is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than L.B. Foster, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio L.B. Foster $540.01M 0.73 $7.55M $1.05 35.80 Linde $33.99B 6.32 $6.90B $15.48 30.12

Is FSTR or LIN more profitable?

Linde has a net margin of 20.43% compared to L.B. Foster's net margin of 2.04%. Linde's return on equity of 20.09% beat L.B. Foster's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets L.B. Foster 2.04% 7.61% 4.03% Linde 20.43% 20.09% 9.28%

Which has higher earnings and valuation, FSTR or KOP?

Koppers has higher revenue and earnings than L.B. Foster. Koppers is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than L.B. Foster, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio L.B. Foster $540.01M 0.73 $7.55M $1.05 35.80 Koppers $1.88B 0.47 $56M -$4.72 N/A

Is FSTR or KOP more profitable?

L.B. Foster has a net margin of 2.04% compared to Koppers' net margin of -4.59%. Koppers' return on equity of 14.98% beat L.B. Foster's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets L.B. Foster 2.04% 7.61% 4.03% Koppers -4.59% 14.98% 4.17%

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, HLMN or FSTR?

Hillman Solutions has higher revenue and earnings than L.B. Foster. Hillman Solutions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than L.B. Foster, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Hillman Solutions $1.55B 0.87 $40.31M $0.22 31.73 L.B. Foster $540.01M 0.73 $7.55M $1.05 35.80

Which has higher valuation and earnings, FSTR or TNC?

Tennant has higher revenue and earnings than L.B. Foster. L.B. Foster is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tennant, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio L.B. Foster $540.01M 0.73 $7.55M $1.05 35.80 Tennant $1.20B 0.98 $43.80M $1.02 67.50

Is FSTR or TNC more profitable?

L.B. Foster has a net margin of 2.04% compared to Tennant's net margin of 1.50%. Tennant's return on equity of 13.32% beat L.B. Foster's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets L.B. Foster 2.04% 7.61% 4.03% Tennant 1.50% 13.32% 6.07%

L.B. Foster (FSTR) Competitors

$37.59 0.00 (0.00%)

Closing price 09/11/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$37.60 +0.00 (+0.01%)

As of 09/11/2026 07:30 PM Eastern

Compare

FSTR vs. HWKN, LIN, KOP, HLMN, and TNC

Should you buy L.B. Foster stock or one of its competitors? L.B. Foster's main competitors and comparable companies include Hawkins (HWKN), Linde (LIN), Koppers (KOP), Hillman Solutions (HLMN), and Tennant (TNC). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size.

How does L.B. Foster compare to Hawkins?

Hawkins (NASDAQ:HWKN) and L.B. Foster (NASDAQ:FSTR) are related companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Hawkins had 3 more articles in the media than L.B. Foster. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Hawkins and 1 mentions for L.B. Foster. Hawkins' average media sentiment score of 1.39 beat L.B. Foster's score of 0.43 indicating that Hawkins is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Hawkins	Positive
L.B. Foster	Neutral

69.7% of Hawkins shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.6% of L.B. Foster shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.7% of Hawkins shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 7.6% of L.B. Foster shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Hawkins has a beta of 0.77, suggesting that its stock price is 23% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, L.B. Foster has a beta of 1.15, suggesting that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

Hawkins currently has a consensus price target of $171.00, indicating a potential upside of 37.83%. L.B. Foster has a consensus price target of $32.00, indicating a potential downside of 14.87%. Given Hawkins' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Hawkins is more favorable than L.B. Foster.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hawkins	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
L.B. Foster	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

Hawkins has higher revenue and earnings than L.B. Foster. Hawkins is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than L.B. Foster, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hawkins	$1.08B	2.39	$81.55M	$3.86	32.14
L.B. Foster	$540.01M	0.73	$7.55M	$1.05	35.80

Hawkins has a net margin of 7.29% compared to L.B. Foster's net margin of 2.04%. Hawkins' return on equity of 15.42% beat L.B. Foster's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hawkins	7.29%	15.42%	8.22%
L.B. Foster	2.04%	7.61%	4.03%

Summary

Hawkins beats L.B. Foster on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does L.B. Foster compare to Linde?

L.B. Foster (NASDAQ:FSTR) and Linde (NASDAQ:LIN) are related companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and media sentiment.

L.B. Foster has a beta of 1.15, meaning that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Linde has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

Linde has higher revenue and earnings than L.B. Foster. Linde is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than L.B. Foster, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
L.B. Foster	$540.01M	0.73	$7.55M	$1.05	35.80
Linde	$33.99B	6.32	$6.90B	$15.48	30.12

80.6% of L.B. Foster shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.8% of Linde shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.6% of L.B. Foster shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Linde shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Linde has a net margin of 20.43% compared to L.B. Foster's net margin of 2.04%. Linde's return on equity of 20.09% beat L.B. Foster's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
L.B. Foster	2.04%	7.61%	4.03%
Linde	20.43%	20.09%	9.28%

In the previous week, Linde had 18 more articles in the media than L.B. Foster. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Linde and 1 mentions for L.B. Foster. Linde's average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat L.B. Foster's score of 0.43 indicating that Linde is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
L.B. Foster	Neutral
Linde	Positive

L.B. Foster presently has a consensus target price of $32.00, suggesting a potential downside of 14.87%. Linde has a consensus target price of $545.07, suggesting a potential upside of 16.91%. Given Linde's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Linde is more favorable than L.B. Foster.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
L.B. Foster	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
Linde	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.07

Summary

Linde beats L.B. Foster on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does L.B. Foster compare to Koppers?

L.B. Foster (NASDAQ:FSTR) and Koppers (NYSE:KOP) are related small-cap companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

L.B. Foster presently has a consensus price target of $32.00, indicating a potential downside of 14.87%. Koppers has a consensus price target of $55.00, indicating a potential upside of 18.40%. Given Koppers' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Koppers is more favorable than L.B. Foster.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
L.B. Foster	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
Koppers	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

80.6% of L.B. Foster shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.8% of Koppers shares are held by institutional investors. 7.6% of L.B. Foster shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 7.3% of Koppers shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

L.B. Foster has a net margin of 2.04% compared to Koppers' net margin of -4.59%. Koppers' return on equity of 14.98% beat L.B. Foster's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
L.B. Foster	2.04%	7.61%	4.03%
Koppers	-4.59%	14.98%	4.17%

In the previous week, L.B. Foster and L.B. Foster both had 1 articles in the media. Koppers' average media sentiment score of 1.71 beat L.B. Foster's score of 0.43 indicating that Koppers is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
L.B. Foster	Neutral
Koppers	Very Positive

Koppers has higher revenue and earnings than L.B. Foster. Koppers is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than L.B. Foster, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
L.B. Foster	$540.01M	0.73	$7.55M	$1.05	35.80
Koppers	$1.88B	0.47	$56M	-$4.72	N/A

L.B. Foster has a beta of 1.15, indicating that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Koppers has a beta of 1.23, indicating that its share price is 23% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Koppers beats L.B. Foster on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does L.B. Foster compare to Hillman Solutions?

Hillman Solutions (NASDAQ:HLMN) and L.B. Foster (NASDAQ:FSTR) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, earnings and institutional ownership.

Hillman Solutions has higher revenue and earnings than L.B. Foster. Hillman Solutions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than L.B. Foster, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hillman Solutions	$1.55B	0.87	$40.31M	$0.22	31.73
L.B. Foster	$540.01M	0.73	$7.55M	$1.05	35.80

In the previous week, Hillman Solutions had 9 more articles in the media than L.B. Foster. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Hillman Solutions and 1 mentions for L.B. Foster. Hillman Solutions' average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat L.B. Foster's score of 0.43 indicating that Hillman Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Hillman Solutions	Positive
L.B. Foster	Neutral

Hillman Solutions has a beta of 1.38, indicating that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, L.B. Foster has a beta of 1.15, indicating that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

Hillman Solutions presently has a consensus price target of $12.67, indicating a potential upside of 81.47%. L.B. Foster has a consensus price target of $32.00, indicating a potential downside of 14.87%. Given Hillman Solutions' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Hillman Solutions is more favorable than L.B. Foster.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hillman Solutions	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.60
L.B. Foster	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

Hillman Solutions has a net margin of 2.57% compared to L.B. Foster's net margin of 2.04%. Hillman Solutions' return on equity of 9.11% beat L.B. Foster's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hillman Solutions	2.57%	9.11%	4.70%
L.B. Foster	2.04%	7.61%	4.03%

98.1% of Hillman Solutions shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.6% of L.B. Foster shares are held by institutional investors. 5.3% of Hillman Solutions shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 7.6% of L.B. Foster shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Hillman Solutions beats L.B. Foster on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does L.B. Foster compare to Tennant?

L.B. Foster (NASDAQ:FSTR) and Tennant (NYSE:TNC) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and risk.

L.B. Foster has a beta of 1.15, indicating that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tennant has a beta of 1.11, indicating that its share price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

Tennant has higher revenue and earnings than L.B. Foster. L.B. Foster is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tennant, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
L.B. Foster	$540.01M	0.73	$7.55M	$1.05	35.80
Tennant	$1.20B	0.98	$43.80M	$1.02	67.50

In the previous week, Tennant had 2 more articles in the media than L.B. Foster. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Tennant and 1 mentions for L.B. Foster. Tennant's average media sentiment score of 1.72 beat L.B. Foster's score of 0.43 indicating that Tennant is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
L.B. Foster	Neutral
Tennant	Very Positive

L.B. Foster presently has a consensus target price of $32.00, suggesting a potential downside of 14.87%. Tennant has a consensus target price of $91.00, suggesting a potential upside of 32.17%. Given Tennant's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Tennant is more favorable than L.B. Foster.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
L.B. Foster	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
Tennant	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

80.6% of L.B. Foster shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.3% of Tennant shares are held by institutional investors. 7.6% of L.B. Foster shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.5% of Tennant shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

L.B. Foster has a net margin of 2.04% compared to Tennant's net margin of 1.50%. Tennant's return on equity of 13.32% beat L.B. Foster's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
L.B. Foster	2.04%	7.61%	4.03%
Tennant	1.50%	13.32%	6.07%

Summary

Tennant beats L.B. Foster on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get L.B. Foster News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FSTR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

FSTR vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	L.B. Foster	Machinery Industry	Industrials Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$395.45M	$11.25B	$10.30B	$12.84B
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.27%	97.17%	11.71%
P/E Ratio	35.80	21.43	25.79	25.35
Price / Sales	0.73	62.91	333.41	90.72
Price / Cash	19.53	22.98	23.85	34.96
Price / Book	2.22	4.30	4.86	6.21
Net Income	$7.55M	$367.28M	$613.10M	$358.54M
7 Day Performance	-1.13%	-1.93%	-1.53%	-2.35%
1 Month Performance	-2.97%	-2.76%	-4.22%	-3.37%
1 Year Performance	37.04%	8.60%	6.24%	8.81%

L.B. Foster Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
FSTR L.B. Foster	2.0011 of 5 stars	$37.59 flat	$32.00 -14.9%	+37.0%	$395.45M	$540.01M	35.80	1,191
HWKN Hawkins	4.9609 of 5 stars	$127.00 -1.6%	$171.00 +34.6%	-28.4%	$2.65B	$1.08B	32.90	1,200	Positive News
LIN Linde	4.6206 of 5 stars	$468.38 -1.9%	$545.38 +16.4%	-3.3%	$215.91B	$35.45B	30.26	65,177	Positive News Analyst Forecast Analyst Revision
KOP Koppers	2.8041 of 5 stars	$47.13 -1.4%	$55.00 +16.7%	+61.5%	$891.32M	$1.89B	N/A	1,859	Positive News
HLMN Hillman Solutions	4.5471 of 5 stars	$7.55 -1.7%	$12.67 +67.8%	-28.1%	$1.47B	$1.55B	34.32	3,986	Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:FSTR) was last updated on 9/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

L.B. Foster (FSTR) Competitors